Radicular Research Articles

Automatic segmentation of dura for quantitative analysis of lumbar stenosis: A deep learning study with 518 CT myelograms.

The diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can be challenging because radicular pain is not often present in the culprit-level localization. Accurate segmentation and quantitative analysis of the lumbar dura on radiographic images are key to the accurate differential diagnosis of LSS. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic dura-contouring tool for radiographic quantification on computed tomography myelogram (CTM) for patients with LSS. A total of 518 CTM cases with or without lumbar stenosis were included in this study. A deep learning (DL) segmentation algorithm 3-dimensional (3D) U-Net was deployed. A total of 210 labeled cases were used to develop the dura-contouring tool, with the ratio of the training, independent testing, and external validation datasets being 150:30:30. The Dice score (DCS) was the primary measure to evaluate the segmentation performance of the 3D U-Net, which was subsequently developed as the dura-contouring tool to segment another unlabeled 308 CTM cases with LSS. Automatic masks of 446 slices on the stenotic levels were then meticulously reviewed and revised by human experts, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dura was compared. The mean DCS of the 3D U-Net were 0.905±0.080, 0.933±0.018, and 0.928±0.034 in the five-fold cross-validation, the independent testing, and the external validation datasets, respectively. The segmentation performance of the dura-contouring tool was also comparable to that of the second observer (the human expert). With the dura-contouring tool, only 59.0% (263/446) of the automatic masks of the stenotic slices needed to be revised. In the revised cases, there were no significant differences in the dura CSA between automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (p=0.652). Additionally, a strong correlation of dura CSA was found between the automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (r=0.805). A dura-contouring tool was developed that could automatically segment the dural sac on CTM, and it demonstrated high accuracy and generalization ability. Additionally, the dura-contouring tool has the potential to be applied in patients with LSS because it facilitates the quantification of the dural CSA on stenotic slices.

Musculoskeletal mimics of lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Electrodiagnostic evaluations are commonly requested for patients with suspected radiculopathy. Understanding lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions is essential for electrodiagnostic medicine specialists, as musculoskeletal disorders often mimic or coexist with radiculopathy. This review delineates radicular pain from other types originating from the lumbosacral spine and describes musculoskeletal conditions frequently mimicking radiculopathy, such as those that cause radiating pain and sensorimotor dysfunction. In clinical evaluation, a history of pain radiating along a specific dermatomal territory with associated sensory disturbance suggests radiculopathy. Physical examination findings consistent with radiculopathy include myotomal weakness, depressed or absent muscle stretch reflexes, focal atrophy along a discrete nerve root territory, and potentially positive dural tension maneuvers like the straight leg raise. However, electrodiagnostic medicine specialists must be knowledgeable of musculoskeletal mimics, which may manifest as incomplete radiation within or beyond a dermatomal territory, non-radiating pain, tenderness, and give-way weakness, in the context of a normal neurological examination. A systematic approach to musculoskeletal examination is vital, and this review focuses on high-yield physical examination maneuvers and diagnostic investigations to differentiate between musculoskeletal conditions and radiculopathy. This approach ensures accurate diagnoses, promotes resource stewardship, enhances patient satisfaction, and optimizes care delivery. Musculoskeletal conditions resembling L1 to S4 radiculopathy are reviewed, emphasizing their distinctive features in history, physical examination, and diagnostic investigation. Among the more than 30 musculoskeletal disorders reviewed are hip and knee osteoarthritis, lumbar facet syndrome, myofascial pain syndrome, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, and plantar fasciitis.

Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection to treat symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) occurs when bony, ligamentous, and synovial elements of the lower axial spine degenerate and overgrow, compressing neural and vascular elements in the spinal canal. Compression can cause static back pain, radicular lower extremity pain, or neurogenic claudication. Radiological and clinical findings are needed to diagnose lumbar stenosis. In this framework, caudal epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a standard treatment. The volume injected and needle positioning are the main issues that could compromise the effectiveness of the epidural injection. However, ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injections have become more common in recent years. Since Klocke and colleagues described the ultra-sound-guided caudal block in 2003, it has grown in popularity. Multiple ethnic studies have reported ultrasound-guided caudal injection success rates of 96.9-100%. Color Doppler ultrasonography can also determine if a drug solution reaches the lumbosacral region. We enrolled 42 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, persistent lumbosciatalgia, and neurogenic claudicatio unresponsive to painkillers who were not surgical candidates. Each patient receives four weekly injections for four weeks. If the patient responds to treatment but still has pain, monthly injections are needed to reach and maintain the benefit. Treatment will be changed if the patient does not respond after 4 caudal injections. Sterile caudal epidural injections are performed with ultrasound guidance and a spinal needle 21G. Triamcinolone 40 mg, levobupivacaine 10 mg, and physiological solution 10 ml are delivered. Each patient received an average of 4 injective treatments (4±2, Means 4, SD 2). Data analysis shows that the treatment reduced pain significantly before and after therapy, which persisted after 3 months. Caudal epidural injection is one of the most common conservative treatments for chronic low back pain with radiculopathy, and lidocaine alone or with steroids is effective. In this framework, the two main literature issues about caudal epidural injection effectiveness on lumbar pain are correct. Therefore, 10 ml is suitable and effective for treating symptoms without side effects. Pain reduction of over 50% from start to finish and three-month follow-up have shown significant results in pain control and disability improvement. Finally, caudal epidural injection for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms is effective, safe, and provides long-term pain relief.

Occupation-based demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation of spine pain: A retrospective analysis of 71,727 patients from urban India.

Although many studies have investigated the physical and ergonomic risks of spine pain in specific occupation groups, the literature is lacking on occupation-based clinical and psychological presentation in patients with spine pain. To analyze occupation-based variation in demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation in patients with spine pain. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 71727 patients with spine pain visiting a chain of spine rehabilitation clinics. Demographic and clinical variables such as gender, age, affected site, symptom duration, clinical symptoms and presentation, pain intensity, disability, and STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) risk were compared between 9 occupational groups. The service and sales workers (44%) and students (43.5%) groups had the highest percentage of patients who presented with central spine pain; military personnel had the highest percentage of patients who presented with unilateral radicular pain (51.5%); and the retired or unemployed group had the highest percentage of patients who presented with severe myotomal loss (grade≤3) (6%). Homemakers had significantly higher pain intensity and disability (p <  0.001) and had the highest percentage of patients who presented with severe pain (47%), severe and crippled disability (59.5%), and medium to high risk (59%) with SBT when compared to other occupational groups. Patients with spine pain showed variation in demographic, clinical, and psychological presentation based on their occupation. The findings of this study can be the basis for identifying risk factors for spine pain and helping plan preventive and treatment measures based on their occupation.

Feasibility of blinding spinal manual therapy interventions among participants and outcome assessors: protocol for a blinding feasibility trial

IntroductionBlinding is a methodologically important aspect in randomised controlled trials yet frequently overlooked in trials of spinal manual therapy interventions for back pain. To help inform the blinding methods of a future, double-placebo-controlled trial comparing spinal manual therapy and nerve root injection for lumbosacral radicular pain, we set four objectives: (1) to assess the feasibility of blinding participants, randomly allocated to an active or placebo-control spinal manual therapy intervention protocol, (2) to assess the feasibility of blinding outcome assessors within the trial, (3) to explore the influence of spinal manual therapy experience and low back pain on blinding, and (4) to explore factors contributing to perceptions about intervention assignment among participants and outcome assessors.Methods and analysisTwo-parallel-group, single-centre, placebo-controlled, methodological blinding feasibility randomised trial. We will recruit between 60 and 100 adults with or without back pain and with or without experience of spinal manual therapy from Zurich, Switzerland. Participants will be randomised to either an active spinal manual therapy or a placebo-control spinal manual therapy protocol—both interventions delivered over two study visits, up to two weeks apart. The primary outcome is participant blinding using the Bang blinding index within each intervention arm immediately after each of the two study visits. Secondary outcomes are participant blinding using the James blinding index, outcome assessor blinding (Bang and James blinding indices), self-reported factors influencing perceived intervention assignment among participants and outcome assessors, and participant-reported credibility and expectancy of study interventions. Other outcomes—included to blind the study objective from participants—are lumbar spine range of motion, self-rated general health, satisfaction with care, pain intensity, and function. Intervention provider outcomes include intervention component fidelity and quality of intervention delivery.Ethics and disseminationThe independent ethics commission of Canton Zurich granted ethical approval for this study (KEK 2023–00381). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated in scientific conferences and a peer-reviewed publication and inform the blinding methods of a future double-placebo controlled trial comparing spinal manual therapy and nerve root injection for lumbosacral radicular pain—the SALuBRITY trial.Trial registrationNCT05778396.

Chiropractic spinal manipulation and likelihood of tramadol prescription in adults with radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study using US data

ObjectivesPatients receiving chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) for low back pain (LBP) are less likely to receive any opioid prescription for subsequent pain management. However, the likelihood of specifically being prescribed...

Comparison of the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Disc Disease.

To compare the radiological outcome and development of heterotopic ossification (HO) following single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc replacement (CDR) for cervical disc herniation and evaluate their impact on surgical success. Descriptive comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Neurosurgery Department at Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye, between January 2020 and June 2022. Patients aged 18-70 years with radicular neck pain unresponsive to conventional medical treatment and an MRI-confirmed diagnosis were included. Patients with osteoporosis (OP) were excluded. Patients were randomised into two treatment groups (ACDF and CDR) and stratified by age and symptom severity. Radiographic assessments and HO classification according to McAfee were performed. Among the included patients, 56 underwent ACDF and 45 underwent CDR. The mean patient age was 48.29 ± 9.530 and 41.84 ± 7.239 years in the ACDF and CDR groups, respectively (p <0.001). The postoperative disc height increased in both groups. The T1 slope was significantly higher preoperatively and in the early postoperative period in the CDR group than in the ACDF group (p = 0.001). HO was graded as 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 28 (27.7%), 6 (5.9%), 7 (6.9%), and 4 (3%) patients, respectively. ACDF and CDR provided similar improvements in radiological measurements and pain relief. Although both procedures significantly enhanced the patient's quality of life and disability scores, HO was more prevalent following CDR during long-term follow-up. Cervical disc replacement, Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, Spinal surgery techniques, Heterotopic ossification.

Differences In The Effect Of Motor Control Exercise And William Flexion Exercise On Pain In Low Back Pain Miogenic Patients At Ambalat Sesko Tni Clinic, Bandung

Changes in the background needs and welfare of human life have led to a shift in modern lifestyle patterns. The growing population has resulted in increased work productivity, along with various types of work activities and a rise in complaints of symptoms like low back pain. Low back pain, or lower back pain, is a complaint where the pain can be local pain (inflammation) or radicular pain in the lower back. This pain can radiate to other areas, or the pain can be felt in the lower back, or it can be felt on a different side of the body from the center of the pain and can be felt in a variety of ways. Occupation is one of the factors causing LBP. Incorrect work postures, for example, sitting static for a long time and not using ergonomic sitting positions, are one of the factors in the occurrence of LBP (WHO, 2013). The purpose of this research is to find out if there is a comparison of the differences in the effect of motor control exercise and William flexion exercise on pain in myogenic low back pain patients at the Ambalat Sesko TNI Bandung clinic in 2023. The design in this study was a quasi-experiment with a control approach of two groups, pre-test and post-test, used to compare two independent groups, namely group I (motor control exercise) and group II (William flexion exercise). The research location was at the Ambalat clinic, Sesko TNI, with a total sample of 20 people. The research data was carried out using the normality test with the Shapiro-Wilk test. After the data was normally distributed, a hypothesis test was carried out using the independent paired sample t-test to obtain a p-value of 0.901 &gt; (? = 0.05). The results of the analysis showed that the intervention of motor control exercise and William flexion exercise had the same effect on reducing pain, and there was no significant difference between giving myogenic low back pain at the Ambalat Sesko TNI Bandung clinic in 2023.

E039 Multiple myeloma and neurological complications: prevalence and risk factors

Abstract Background/Aims Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant haematological disorder with a highly variable clinical presentation. Few studies have explored the neurological complications (CN) associated with MM. The objectives of this study were to describe the neurological manifestations observed in MM and to determine predictive factors for neurological complications. Methods We collected data from 126 cases of symptomatic multiple myeloma patients followed in our department over a 30-year period (1993 - 2023). We gathered sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Neurological complications were diagnosed based on clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging data. Results Our study included 126 patients with an average age of 65.23 ± 11.63 years [36-92], and a male-to-female sex ratio of 3.8. Bone pain was present in 92.1% (116 cases) with an average duration of 4 months. The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels were 99.08 mm at H1 [3-190] and 27.74 [0-196], respectively. Hemoglobin levels were less than 10g/dl in 51.2% of cases, with an average of 9.902 ± 2.22 g/dl [5-13.9]. Calcium levels exceeded 2.75 mmol/l in 20% of cases, with an average of 2.49 ± 0.33 mmol/l. The mean creatinine level was 88.28 ± 77.9 μmol/l [36-587], with levels above 177 μmol/l observed in 15 cases (10.4%). The Durie and Salmon prognostic classification categorized our patients as follows: Stage IA (3.2%), Stage IIA (4%), Stage IIB (0.8%), Stage IIIA (72.2%), and Stage IIIB (18.3%). Neurological complications were present in 22.2% of patients (n = 28). Sixteen patients (12.7%) had spinal cord compression, with nine having dorsal involvement, six having conus medullaris involvement, and one having cervical involvement. Radicular pain affected 14 patients, with eight experiencing sciatalgia and four having cruralgia. Two patients (1.8%) had carpal tunnel syndrome. No cerebral involvement was observed in our series. In our study, only creatinine levels were significantly lower in patients who developed neurological complications (64.35 vs. 95.19, p = 0.004). However, the occurrence of neurological complications was independent of age (p = 0.696), duration of evolution (p = 0.669), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.541), C-reactive protein (p = 0.963), hemoglobin (p = 0.076), or calcium levels (p = 0.274). No association was found between neurological complications and gender (p = 0.849) or prognostic stage (p = 0.119) Conclusion Neurological manifestations in MM are diverse and often underestimated. The diagnosis of MM should be considered in the presence of spinal or radicular compression, especially when the laboratory findings suggest it. Disclosure M. Dhifallah: None. I. Fenniche: None. A. Feki: None. S. Ben Djemaa: None. M. Kallel: None. H. Fourat: None. R. Akrout: None. S. Baklouti: None.

Incidental durotomy resulting in a postoperative lumbosacral nerve root with eventration into the adjacent facet joint: illustrative cases.

Radicular pain after lumbar decompression surgery can result from epidural hematoma/seroma, recurrent disc herniation, incomplete decompression, or other rare complications. A less recognized complication is postoperative nerve root herniation, resulting from an initially unrecognized intraoperative or, more commonly, a spontaneous postoperative durotomy. Rarely, this nerve root herniation can become entrapped within local structures, including the facet joint. The aim of this study was to illustrate our experience with three cases of lumbosacral nerve root eventration into an adjacent facet joint and to describe our diagnostic and surgical approach to this rare complication. Three patients who had undergone lumbar decompression surgery with or without fusion experienced postoperative radiculopathy. Exploratory revision surgery revealed all three had a durotomy with nerve root eventration into the facet joint. Significant symptom improvement was achieved in all patients following liberation of the neural elements from the facet joints. Entrapment of herniated nerve roots into the facet joint may be a previously underappreciated complication and remains quite challenging to diagnose even with the highest-quality advanced imaging. Thus, clinicians must have a high index of suspicion to diagnose this issue and a low threshold for surgical exploration.

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion secondary to lumbosacral fusion: clinical and functional results at 2 years of follow-up

Introduction: Degenerative sacroiliac (SI) joint syndrome is known to be more common after lumbosacral fusion. While this diagnosis is suspected based on various clinical criteria and diagnostic tests, it is confirmed with a diagnostic nerve block. If conservative treatment fails, SI joint fusion through a minimally invasive approach is a useful palliative approach for patients at a treatment crossroads. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results at 2 years postoperative after minimally invasive SI joint fusion in patients with SI joint syndrome following lumbosacral fusion.Materials and Methods: We carried out a single-center retrospective study of patients operated between June 2017 and October 2020. Included were patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of SI joint syndrome after lumbosacral fusion surgery, who underwent SI joint fusion and had at least 2 years’ follow-up. The primary outcome was the improvement in lumbar and radicular pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the functional scores (Oswestry and SF-12) along with the level of patient satisfaction. Our study population consisted of 54 patients (41 women, 13 men) with a mean age of 59 years (27–88). Thirty-one of these patients were operated on both sides (85 fusions in all). The patients had undergone a mean of 3 lumbar surgeries (1–7) before the SI fusion.Results: The lumbar and radicular NRS were 8.4 (7-10) and 5.1 (2-10) preoperatively and 5.2 (0-8) and 3.0 (0-8) at 2 years postoperatively, which was a reduction of 37% and 42% (p<0.001), respectively. The Oswestry score went from 69.4 (52-86) preoperatively to 45.6 (29-70) at 2 years, which was a 33% improvement (p < 0.001). Eighty-six percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery.Discussion: After minimally invasive SI joint fusion, the patients in this study had clear clinical and functional improvements. Previous publications analyzing the results of SI joint fusion found even more improvement, but those patients were relatively heterogenous; in our study, only patients who had a history of lumbosacral fusion were included.Conclusion: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion helped patients who developed SI joint syndrome after lumbosacral fusion to improve clinically and functionally.Level of evidence: IV, Retrospective study

Effective and Successful Control of Symptomatic Vertebral Hemangiomas With Epidural Extension Using Stereotactic Spine Radiosurgery.

We present our experience in the management of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas with epidural extension (SVHEE) using spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of all SVHEE patients treated with SSRS at our institution (2007-2022) was performed. Baseline patient demographics, clinical presentation, lesion volume, and Bilsky grade (to directly evaluate the epidural component) were determined. Clinical and radiographic response and treatment outcomes were subsequently evaluated at first (∼6 months) and final follow-up. Fourteen patients with SVHEE underwent SSRS (16-18 Gy/1-fraction); the mean follow-up was 24 months. The median lesion volume (cc) was 36.9 (range: 7.02-94.1), 31.5 (range: 6.53-69.7), and 25.15 (range: 6.01-52.5) at pre-SSRS, first, and final follow-up, respectively. Overall volume reduction was seen in the last follow-up in all 14 patients, median 29.01% (range: 6.58%-71.58%). Bilsky score was stable or improved in all patients at the last follow-up when compared with pre-SSRS score. Patients who underwent both surgical decompression and SSRS (n = 9): 8 had improved myelopathic symptoms and pain and 1 had stable radiculopathy postintervention. In the 5 patients treated with SSRS monotherapy, 2 had stable radicular pain and the other 3 improved pain and numbness. No patients experienced adverse outcomes. To our knowledge, this represents the largest series of SVHEE patients treated with SSRS, either as monotherapy or part of a multimodal/separation surgery treatment approach. We demonstrate that SSRS represents a potentially safe and effective treatment option in these patients. However, larger prospective studies and longer follow-ups are necessary to further assess the role, durability, and toxicity of SSRS in the management of these patients.

A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Triamcinolone vs Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants in Caudal Block in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common issue among older adults. Radicular pain syndromes are often managed with caudal epidural injections. Our study aimed to compare the effects of triamcinolone and magnesium sulfate, used as adjuvants to local anesthetics in caudal blocks, on pain levels and quality of life in patients with LBP. Methods: A total of 40 patients undergoing caudal block were randomized to two groups,received 10 mL caudal epidural injection of either injection 9 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and 1 mL of triamcinolone; 40 mg (Group T, n = 20) or magnesium sulfate; 200 mg (group M, n = 20). Improvements in the pain score measured with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and functional ability measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were the primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. Before, one month and three months after the caudl block, the VAS and ODI scores were evaluated. Results: The VAS and ODI scores did not exhibit a significant difference between the 2 groups at all post-injection time points, except for the VAS score at 3 months, which showed a statistically lower value in group M compared to group T (P = 0.046). However, when comparing within the same group, both groups showed significantly improved VAS and ODI scores at all post-injection time points compared to the pre-injection scores (P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: The addition of magnesium or triamcinolone to a local anesthetic in caudal epidural injections does not result in any discernible difference. However, this combination may lead to improvements in pain levels and quality of life, and these improvements can be sustained for up to 3 months.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain with Neuropathic Component in a Pain Medicine Clinic in Mexico: Retrospective Study

Introduction: Low back pain is a common problem affecting millions worldwide. Even after surgical treatment some patients do not improve; others suffer from persistent radiculopathy. We define Complex Chronic Low Back Pain (CCLBP) as any low back pain that has lasted for at least three months and has at least two triggering pain mechanisms. Objective: To describe our experience with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in managing CCLBP with a neuropathic component Methods: Quantitative, retrospective analysis from 57 medical records of patients treated with PRP for CCLBP. We used IBM-SPSS 21 to obtain descriptive statistics, Chi-square, Student T and Odds-Ratio. Results: The mean age of our sample was 59.8 (±14.4) years, with 6.51 (±8.7) years of pain and a follow-up of 9 (±12.2) months. 33.3% had lumbar surgery, 29.8% had lumbar trauma, 31.6% used a walking aid, 56.7% had MODIC changes on MRI, and 42% of them received intraosseous-PRP technic. 84.2% reported severe pain (VAS 8-10). The results showed that 96.5% of patients experienced some improvement after PRP treatment. Additionally, 10.5% experienced pain suppression. No significant differences in age, lumbar trauma, lumbar surgery, diseases, or the use of walking aids between patients who benefited from PRP treatment and those who did not. VAS after treatment shows significance (p&lt;0.01) with 5.36±2.6 points. Subjects with less than five years of radicular pain had an improvement greater than 3 points on VAS (OR 7.38, IC95% 1.72-31.7). Conclusion: Autologous platelet-rich plasma injections for chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component are an effective alternative to address CCLBP’s current challenge. New studies with greater statistical power are necessary to make a statement of efficacy, but with the data obtained, it seems a promising option.&#x0D; Keywords: Platelet-Rich Plasma, Low Back Pain, Radiculopathy, Intraosseous

Convolutional neural network algorithm trained on lumbar spine radiographs to predict outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbosacral radicular pain from spinal stenosis

Little is known about the therapeutic outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Using lumbar spine radiographs as input data, we trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict therapeutic outcomes after lumbar TFESI in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain caused by LSS. We retrospectively recruited 193 patients for this study. The lumbar spine radiographs included anteroposterior, lateral, and bilateral (left and right) oblique views. We cut each lumbar spine radiograph image into a square shape that included the vertebra corresponding to the level at which the TFESI was performed and the vertebrae juxta below and above that level. Output data were divided into “favorable outcome” (≥ 50% reduction in the numeric rating scale [NRS] score at 2 months post-TFESI) and “poor outcome” (< 50% reduction in the NRS score at 2 months post-TFESI). Using these input and output data, we developed a CNN model for predicting TFESI outcomes. The area under the curve of our model was 0.920. Its accuracy was 87.2%. Our CNN model has an excellent capacity for predicting therapeutic outcomes after lumbar TFESI in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain induced by LSS.

Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios. For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region. A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.

Comparison of Open Surgery versus Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-severe Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery in correcting ADS. Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a scoliosis secondary to degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs and facet joints in adults. Severe low back pain, radicular pain, and intermittent claudication are often present and require surgical treatment. PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) Database, Wanfang Data, Weipu Database, and China Biomedical Document Service System (CBM) were systematically searched for studies that focused on the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery to correct ADS. This meta-analysis included 11 studies, involving 1527 patients (581 in the MIS group and 946 in the open surgery group). Regarding surgery and outcome indicators, the operative time in the open surgery group was shorter, the MIS group had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospitalization time, and lower incidence of serious postoperative complications. In terms of imaging parameters, although there was no significant difference in Cobb angle improvement and sagittal balance, the open surgery group exhibited better lumbar lordosis improvement and pelvic tilt improvement. In terms of clinical scores, including changes in the ODI index and VAS scores for low back and leg pain, similar improvements were appreciated across both groups. In mild to moderate ADS, we found that the advantages of open surgery include greater improvement in lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt angle and shorter operative time. The advantages of minimally invasive surgery are less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and fewer serious postoperative complications. There is no significant difference between the two surgical methods in terms of Cobb angle, clinical pain and SVA improvement.

Oral Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Increases Parasympathetic Activity and Supraspinal Conditioned Pain Modulation in Chronic Neuropathic Pain Male Patients: A Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Disordered autonomic nervous system regulation and supraspinal pain inhibitionhave been repeatedly described in chronic pain. We aimed to explore the effects of δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), an emerging treatment option, on autonomic nervous system and central pain modulation measures in patients with chronic pain. Twelve male patients with chronic radicular neuropathic pain participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled, single-administration trial. Low/high frequency (LF/HF) heart rate variability (HRV) ratio and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) response were measured and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline and after sublingual administration of either 0.2mg/kg oral THC or placebo. THC significantly reduced the LF/HF ratio compared with placebo (interaction effect F(1,11) = 20.5; p<0.005) and significantly improved CPM responses (interaction effect F(1,9) = 5.2; p=0.048). The THC-induced reduction in LF/HF ratio correlated with increased functional connectivity between the rostral ventrolateral medulla and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [T(10) = 6.4, cluster p-FDR<0.005]. THC shifts the autonomic balance towards increased parasympathetic tone and improves inhibitory pain mechanisms in chronic pain. The increase in vagal tone correlateswith connectivity changes in higher-order regulatory brain regions, suggesting THC exerts top-down effects. These changes may reflect a normalizing effect of THC on multiple domains ofsupraspinal pain dysregulation. NCT02560545.

Evaluation of Cervical Vertebral Motion and Foraminal Changes During the Spurling Test Using Zero Echo Time MRI and CT Micromotion Analysis.

Clinical experimental diagnostic study. The objective of the study was to investigate cervical spine dynamics including changes of the cervical foramina in patients experiencing intermittent arm radiculopathy. Cervical foraminal stenosis is a frequent cause of radicular arm pain. The Spurling test, while specific, lacks the precision to identify symptomatic nerve roots. The relationship between vertebral motion, foraminal changes, and radiculopathy during a Spurling test remains underexplored. Ten patients with positive Spurling tests and MRI-confirmed one or two level cervical foraminal stenosis were scanned using the Dynamic MRI Compression System (DMRICS) enabling a simulated Spurling test inside the MRI gantry of a 3T MRI scanner with a dedicated neck coil. First, a relaxed image acquisition was undertaken followed by slowly applying the Spurling test until the patient reported aggravation of radiculopathy or discomfort, where the next image series was taken. Zero Echo Time (ZTE) MRI was employed to obtain CT-like images. The images were thereafter analyzed using the Sectra® CT-based Micromotion Analysis (CTMA) software for motion analysis. The C4/C5 level exhibited the most significant movements both in translation and rotation, with less movements observed in C5-6 and C6-C7 levels. No uniform pattern emerged that differentiated suspected stenotic levels from non-suspected levels. Despite relatively small vertebral movements, 9/10 of patients reported arm pain during provocation, indicating extremely narrow margins of tolerance. This study demonstrates the utility of ZTE MRI and CTMA in detecting subtle yet clinically relevant vertebral motions influencing the foramina in the cervical spine during the Spurling maneuver. These findings could lead to better understanding and potentially improved diagnostic strategies for cervical foraminal stenosis, although further research with a larger cohort is necessary to confirm these results.

FACTFINDERS for PATIENT SAFETY: Preventing procedure-related complications: Epidural lipomatosis and postpartum steroid exposure

This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations to improve our understanding and management of potential procedure-related complications.Evidence in support of the following facts is presented. (1) Epidural Steroid injections for Radicular Pain Due to Spinal Stenosis Caused by Lipomatosis -- There is low-level evidence of an association between epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and the development and/or worsening of spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL). However, there is insufficient evidence to establish whether ESIs independently result in an increase in spinal stenosis with neurological compromise in individuals with pre-existing SEL. (2) Steroid Exposure Postpartum -- There is no absolute contraindication to steroid injections based on postpartum or lactating status, but there may be disruption of both maternal and breastfed child hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response to steroid administration. For the duration of breastfeeding, milk production may be affected after steroid exposure, and withholding breast milk produced for several hours after exposure minimizes infant exposure.