Radical Surgery Group Research Articles

Effectiveness of Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery is the common treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Presently, for patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, organ preservation ("watch-and-wait" and local excision strategies) has been increasingly favored. However, the optimal treatment for patients with complete clinical response remains still unclear. This study aimed to use Bayesian meta-analysis to determine the best treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response among radical surgery, local excision, and watch and wait strategies. PubMed, Web Of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase(Ovid) were searched until December 31, 2023. Studies that compared two or more treatments for patients with complete clinical response were included. The analysis was completed via Bayesian meta-analysis using random-effects model. Surgery-related complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate. Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. The groups of watch and wait and local excision exhibited a higher rate of tumor recurrence compared to radical surgery group (OR [95% CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 9.10 [3.30, 32.3], local excision VS radical surgery: 2.93 [1.05, 9.95]). The distant metastasis, overall and disease-free survival rates of 3 treatments were not statistically different. The radical surgery group had the most number of stoma, and had the greatest risk of morbidity than the watch and wait group (OR[95%CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 0.00 [0.00, 0.12]). The study included only 1 randomized controlled trial compared to 10 observational studies, which could affect overall quality. Funnel plots of disease-free survival rates and stoma suggest significant publication bias among studies which compared radical surgery with watch and wait strategy. The watch and wait strategy could be optimal for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Clinical Outcomes Between Completion and Abandonment of Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients with Lymph Nodal Involvement Identified During Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes of early-stage cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis found during surgery who completed radical hysterectomy, or abandoned surgery and switched to chemoradiotherapy, in hopes of providing evidence for clinical treatment. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to 20 November 2023. The analysis was conducted using STATA 16.0. A total of eight studies with 2105 early-stage cervical cancer patients were included in this review. Meta-analysis found no significant difference between the completing radical hysterectomy surgery (CRS) group and the abandoning radical surgery (ARS) group regarding overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.97; I2 = 27.2%, p = 0.221), progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14-1.07; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.625) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.13-2.84; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.574). Meta-analysis found the total recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.79; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.810) and pelvic recurrence (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.91; I2 = 12.4%, p = 0.320) in the CRS group were less than those in the ARS group. Meta-analysis found that compared with the ARS group, the CRS group had fewer grade 3/4 adverse effects (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.591). Current evidence suggests that for early-stage cervical cancer patients with positive lymph nodes detected during surgery, CRS and ARS have similar survival outcomes, but completing radical surgery results in a lower incidence of pelvic recurrence. CRD42023480118.

Comparative analysis of organ preservation attempt and radical surgery in clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer

PurposeDebate persists regarding the feasibility of adopting an organ-preserving strategy as the treatment modality for clinical T2N0 rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of attempting organ-preserving strategies versus radical surgery in patients with clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer.MethodsPatients diagnosed with clinical T2N0 rectal cancer, with lesions located within 8 cm from the anal verge as determined by pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging between January 2010 and December 2020 were included.ResultsOf 119 patients, 91 and 28 were categorized into the organ-preserving attempt group and the radical surgery group, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 48.8 months (range, 0–134 months). The organ-preserving attempt group exhibited a reduced incidence of stoma formation (44.0% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.004) and a lower occurrence of grade 3 or higher surgical complications (5.8% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.025). Univariate analyses revealed no significant association between treatment strategy and 3-year local recurrence-free survival (organ-preserving attempt 87.9% vs. radical surgery 96.2%; p = 0.129), or 3-year disease-free survival (79.6% vs. 84.9%; p = 0.429). Multivariate analysis did not identify any independent prognostic factors associated with oncologic outcomes.ConclusionCompared with radical surgery, attempted organ preservation resulted in lower incidences of stoma formation and severe surgical complications, whereas oncological outcomes were comparable. Attempting organ preservation may be a safe alternative to radical surgery for clinical T2N0 mid to low rectal cancer.

Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix

Background: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in treating patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (HGNEC). Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea, from January 1993 to December 2017, involving 60 patients with surgically treated HGNEC. Thirteen patients (21.7%) received NACT before undergoing surgery. Regarding the comparison between the group that underwent NACT and the group that did not, we used a propensity score-matched analysis, matching 22 patients in the primary radical surgery group with 11 patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy group. Results: In the entire cohort, primary open surgery was more common in the primary surgery group compared to the NACT group (p = 0.004). After propensity score matching (PSM), the median tumor size was 3.5 cm in the primary surgery group and 2.4 cm in the NACT group (p = 0.078). After matching, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (63.6% in the primary surgery group vs. 63.6% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, p = 0.782). After PSM, the primary surgery group exhibited a lower intraoperative transfusion rate (10%) than the NACT group (45.5%, p = 0.052). Conclusions: While NACT was feasible in patients with HGNEC, it did not significantly improve the survival rate over primary radical surgery.

Clinical diagnosis and treatment of 37 cases of gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma

ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics, treatment approaches, and prognosis of gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GB-NEC).MethodsRetrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 37 patients with GB-NEC admitted to Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2010 to June 2023. The study included an examination of their general information, treatment regimens, and overall prognosis.ResultsTwelve cases, either due to distant metastasis or other reasons, did not undergo surgical treatment and received palliative chemotherapy (Group 1). Two cases underwent simple cholecystectomy (Group 2); four patients underwent palliative tumor resection surgery (Group 3), and nineteen patients underwent radical resection surgery (Group 4). Among the 37 GB-NEC patients, the average pre-surgery CA19-9 level was 113.29 ± 138.45 U/mL, and the median overall survival time was 19 months (range 7.89–30.11 months). Of these, 28 cases (75.7%) received systemic treatment, 25 cases (67.6%) underwent surgical intervention, and 16 cases (64.0%) received postoperative adjuvant treatment, including combined radiochemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. The median overall survival time was 4 months (0.61–7.40 months) for Group 1 (n = 12), 8 months for Group 2 (n = 2), 21 months (14.67–43.33 months) for Group 3 (n = 4), and 19 months (range 7.89–30.11 months) for Group 4 (n = 19). A significant difference in median overall survival time was observed between Group 1 and Group 4 (P = 0.004).ConclusionSurgery remains the primary treatment for GB-NEC, with radical resection potentially offering greater benefits to patient survival compared to other therapeutic options. Postoperative adjuvant therapy has the potential to extend patient survival, although the overall prognosis remains challenging.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. radical surgery for mid-low rectal cancer in patients with clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

e15616 Background: Following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), total mesorectal excision surgery used to be the standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, the radical surgery is associated with high complication rates and impairs patients' quality of life, especially for non-sphincter preservation procedures. For the past two decades, nCRT followed by organ preservation strategies like watch-and-wait (W&W) or local resection offers an alternative for patients being clinically evaluated with complete response or near complete response, however the oncological outcomes of these approaches require further exploration. Methods: We prospectively collected data on 80 patients with T3-4N0M0 or TanyN+M0 mid-low rectal cancer who achieved cCR or near-cCR after nCRT from May 2017 to September 2021 at 5 tertiary centers in China. Patients were divided into the TEM group (group A) or the radical surgery group (group B). Clinicopathological features, operative outcomes, oncological and functional results were analyzed. Results: A total of 76 cases were analyzed, with 38 in each group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Postoperative histology revealed 22 ypT0Nx(57.9%), 5 ypT1Nx(13.2%), 10 ypT2Nx (26.3%), 1 ypT3Nx(2.6%) in group A, and 18 ypT0N0 (47.4%), 5 ypT1N0 (13.2%), 11 ypT2-3N0 (28.9%), 1 ypT0N1 (2.6%), 3 ypT2-3N1 (7.9%) in group B. After a median follow-up of 61 months, 2 patients (5.26%) in group A experienced local recurrence, while none in group B. 8 patients (21.05%) in group A developed distant metastases compared to 5 (13.16%) in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in 5-year disease-free survival(P = 0.320), or 5-year overall survival (P = 0.425). Patients in group A had significantly faster postoperative recovery and a superior quality of life evaluated by the Wexner and LARS scores compared to group B. Conclusions: For cCR and near-cCR LARC patients after nCRT, organ preservation with TEM may serve as a staging method to evaluate local tumor persisrence. And it provides an alternative therapy for carefully selected patients who have needs to preserve sphincteric function or can’t tolerate radical resection, without significantly compensate long-term oncological outcomes. This strategy could relatively safely enable sphincteric function preservation for these patients with faster postoperative recovery and better quality of life. Clinical trial information: NCT03042000 .

Effect of different treatment modalities on the prognosis of patients with stage IIIC cervical cancer.

To compare the effects of different treatments on the prognosis of patients with stage IIIC cervical cancer and to identify the main influencing factors to predict the outcomes of patients. In this study, a total of 1763 patients with stage IIIC cervical cancer from 2010-2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and these patients were divided into the radical radiotherapy ± chemotherapy group (877 patients) and the radical surgery + radiotherapy ± chemotherapy group (886 patients) according to the treatment methods. The survival differences between the two groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Unifactorial and multifactorial COX analyses screened the clinical factors affecting the prognosis. The nomogram was constructed, and the accuracy of the line graph was verified using the C-index, calibration, and ROC (receiver operator characteristic curve, ROC). Age, race, T-stage, pathologic type, mass size, whether or not they underwent surgery, and whether or not they received radiotherapy were independent factors affecting Overall Survival (OS). For all patients with TxN1M0 in cervical cancer stage IIIC, radical synchronized radiotherapy was better than the radical surgery group (p<0.0001). After comparing the tumor size breakdown, it could be found that in the T1N1M0, T2N1M0, and T3N1M0 groups, none of the OS in the surgical group achieved an improvement in OS compared with that in the non-surgical group (p>0.05). In patients with stage IIIC cervical cancer, OS did not improve in the radical surgery group compared with the radical simultaneous radiotherapy group. And surgery did not benefit patients' survival regardless of tumor size.

Borderline tumours of ovary and fertility preservation–Outcomes from a tertiary care center in India

ObjectiveBorderline ovarian tumors (BOT) are characterized by atypical epithelial proliferation without stromal invasion and majority are diagnosed in women of reproductive age group desirous of fertility preservation. MethodsA retrospective review of medical records of patients diagnosed with BOT and on regular follow up at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, during a nine-year study period from March 2014 to March 2023 was performed. Surgical treatment was classified as radical or fertility sparing surgery (FSS). Surgical staging was defined as complete, partial or un-staged. ResultsMedian age of 91 women was 34 years. Follow up period ranged from 4 to 222 months (median 77 months). Among 68 premenopausal women, 31 (46 %) underwent radical surgery and FSS in 37 (54 %) cases. Median time to conception in 29 women with future fertility wishes was 13 months (range, 4 to38 m). Seven of 29 cases (29 %) required ovulation induction. The pregnancy rate was 82.7 % and live birth rate was 80 %. Eight cases (8.7 %) had a recurrence (7- un-staged, 1- partially staged) and median time to recur was 36 months. There was no significant difference in recurrence between cystectomy/oophorectomy. Ovary was the site of recurrence in all surgically salvaged cases except peritoneal cavity in 1 case with mortality. Relapse free survival at 5 and 10 years in FSS and radical surgery group were similar. ConclusionFSS is a safe procedure and should be considered in young patients desirous of future fertility along with a comprehensive peritoneal staging. Reproductive outcomes are excellent.

Local excision versus radical surgery for anal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter study in Japan

BackgroundThe standard treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma is chemoradiation therapy (CRT), but there is a possibility of over-treatment for early-stage disease. cTisN0 and cT1N0 disease is currently indicated for local excision, but it is unclear whether the indication of local excision can be expanded to cT2N0 disease.Methods126 patients with cTis-T2N0 anal cancer treated at 47 centers in Japan between 1991 and 2015 were included. Patients were first classified into the CRT group and surgical therapy group according to the initial therapy, and the latter was further divided into local excision (LE) and radical surgery (RS) groups. We compared prognoses among the groups, and analyzed risk factors for recurrence after local excision.ResultsThe CRT group (n = 87) and surgical therapy group (n = 39) showed no difference in relapse-free survival (p = 0.29) and overall survival (p = 0.94). Relapse-free survival curves in the LE (n = 23) and RS groups (n = 16) overlapped for the initial 3 years, but the curve for the LE group went lower beyond (p = 0.33). By contrast, there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups (p = 0.98). In the LE group, the majority of recurrences distributed in locoregional areas, which could be managed by salvage treatments. Muscular invasion was associated with recurrence after local excision (hazard ratio: 22.91, p = 0.011).ConclusionLE may be applied to selected patients with anal cancer of cTis-T2N0 stage. Given the high risk of recurrence in cases with muscular invasion, it may be important to consider close surveillance and additional treatment in such patients.

The prognosis of patients with primary pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: Treated with surgery or chemotherapy?

The goal of this project was to evaluate the effect of surgical treatment and the long-term survival of patients with staged IE/IIE pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. From January 2004 to December 2018, we retrospectively analysed 96 patients diagnosed with low-stage primary pulmonary MALT lymphoma according to the modified Ann Arbor staging system (IE/IIE). We compared the outcomes of different treatment modalities for staged IE/IIE MALT lymphoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used in this study. The median PFS time of low-staged MALT lymphomas was 118 months. The overall survival and PFS of the radical surgery group and the biopsy + chemotherapy group suggested no significant difference (P = 0.63, P = 0.65). Patients positive for Blc-2 and Ki-67 suffered from a compromised PFS (P = 0.023, P = 0.006). The Cox adjusted proportional hazards model analysis suggested that surgical procedures were not protective factors for patients with low-staged (IE/IIE) pulmonary MALT lymphoma, whereas being positive for Blc-2 and Ki-67 was a risk factor for patients with low-staged pulmonary MALT lymphoma (hazard ratio: 9.567; P = 0.044; hazard ratio: 6.042, P = 0.049). Our findings suggested that for staged IE/IIE pulmonary MALT lymphoma, radical surgical resection did not provide a survival benefit compared with chemotherapy after biopsy. Thus, radical surgery may be avoided unless biopsy is necessary for a diagnosis that requires sublobar resection. For those lesions that were Blc-2- or Ki-67-positive, compromised survival may be suggested.

A Modified eCura System to Stratify the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Resection.

The original eCura system was designed to stratify the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) after endoscopic resection (ER) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). We assessed the effectiveness of a modified eCura system for reflecting the characteristics of undifferentiated-type (UD)-EGC. Six hundred thirty-four patients who underwent non-curative ER for UD-EGC and received either additional surgery (radical surgery group; n=270) or no further treatment (no additional treatment group; n=364) from 18 institutions between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively included in this study. The eCuraU system assigned 1 point each for tumors >20 mm in size, ulceration, positive vertical margin, and submucosal invasion <500 µm; 2 points for submucosal invasion ≥500 µm; and 3 points for lymphovascular invasion. LNM rates in the radical surgery group were 1.1%, 5.4%, and 13.3% for the low- (0-1 point), intermediate- (2-3 points), and high-risk (4-8 points), respectively (P-for-trend<0.001). The eCuraU system showed a significantly higher probability of identifying patients with LNM as high-risk than the eCura system (66.7% vs. 22.2%; McNemar P<0.001). In the no additional treatment group, overall survival (93.4%, 87.2%, and 67.6% at 5 years) and cancer-specific survival (99.6%, 98.9%, and 92.9% at 5 years) differed significantly among the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, respectively (both P<0.001). In the high-risk category, surgery outperformed no treatment in terms of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 3.26; P=0.015). The eCuraU system stratified the risk of LNM in patients with UD-EGC after ER. It is strongly recommended that high-risk patients undergo additional surgery.

Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early Ovarian Malignancies.

The demand for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has increased in the last decade due to increased maternal age, increased incidence of ovarian malignancies in younger patients, and technical advances in surgery. Data on oncological safety and fertility outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer after laparoscopic FSS are sparse, but some retrospective studies have shown that open FSS may be offered to selected patients. We assessed the role of minimally invasive FSS in comparison with radical surgery (RS) in terms of oncological safety and reproductive outcomes after FSS in this multicenter study. Eighty patients with FIGO stage I/II ovarian cancer treated with laparoscopic FSS or RS between 01/2000 and 10/2018 at the participating centers (comprehensive gynecological cancer centers with minimally invasive surgical expertise) were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively kept data. Case-control (n = 40 each) matching according to the FIGO stage was performed. Progression-free survival [150 (3-150) and 150 (5-150) months; p = 0.61] and overall survival [36 (3-150) and 50 (1-275) months; p = 0.65] did not differ between the FSS and RS groups. Eight (25.8%) women became pregnant after FSS, resulting in seven (22.5%) deliveries; three (37.5%) patients conceived after in vitro fertilization, and five (62.5%) conceived spontaneously. Laparoscopic FSS seems to be applicable and oncologically safe for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, with adequate fertility outcomes.

Risk of metastasis and survival in patients undergoing different treatment strategies with T1 colonic neuroendocrine tumors.

The efficacy and safety of local excision (LE) for small (< 1‒2cm) colonic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is controversial due to the higher metastasis risk when compared with rectal NETs. The study aimed to evaluate the metastasis risk of T1 colonic NETs and compare patients' long-term prognosis after LE or radical surgery (RS). The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify patients with T1 colonic NETs (2004‒2015). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with metastasis risk. Propensity score matching was used to balance the variables. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated to estimate the prognosis of patients with T1N0M0 colonic NETs who underwent LE or RS. Of the 610 patients with colonic NETs, 46 (7.54%) had metastasis at diagnosis. Tumor size (11-20mm) (OR = 9.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.32‒21.45; P < 0.001), right colon (OR = 15.79; 95% CI 7.20‒38.56; P < 0.001), submucosal infiltration (OR = 2.08; 95% CI 0.84‒5.57; P = 0.125) were independent risk factors associated with metastasis. Of the 515 patients with T1N0M0 colonic NETs, the overall long-term prognosis of LE was as good as that of RS groups (after matching, 5-year CSS: 97.9% vs. 94.6%, P = 0.450; 5-year OS: 92.7% vs. 85.6%, P = 0.009). Tumor size (11‒20mm) and site (right colon) are associated with metastasis in T1 colonic NETs. In the absence of metastasis, LE could be a viable option for 0‒10mm T1 colonic NETs with well/moderate differentiation in the left colon in terms of long-term survival.

Evaluation of Bowel Function of Women with Colorectal Endometriosis: a Cross-Sectional Study.

The objective was to evaluate bowel function in women with colorectal endometriosis according to treatment type. Cross-sectional study, carried out with 141 women with endometriosis, followed by the University of Campinas from May 2020 to April 2021. Women were divided into 3 groups according to the kind of treatment: 16 women with conservative surgery, 35 women with radical surgery treatment, and 90 women with clinical treatment. The clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of these women were evaluated. To access bowel outcome, we used the following questionnaires: the Bristol Stool Scale, the Bowel Function in the Community, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). The mean treatment time was 32.24 ± 29.37months. The women of the three groups had similar gastrointestinal quality of life index scores (p = 0.27) and pelvic floor distress inventory scores (p = 0.23). Women in the radical surgery group had a higher frequency of evacuatory effort and change in posture to evacuate (p = 0.01 and 0.009, respectively) than did those in the other groups. Women with constipation had worse quality of life and more pain than those without constipation. In conclusion, women with endometriosis treated with radical surgery (segmental resection) had a higher frequency of constipation. In addition, women with endometriosis and constipation had a worse quality of life and higher pain scores compared to those without constipation.

Comparison between radical surgery and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundThe prognostic value of radical surgery (RS) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) was estimated using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).MethodsThis retrospective study used SEER data of CEC patients between 2004 and 2015. The prognostic effects on cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated using multivariate cox regression analysis following radical surgery or CRT before and after PSM. The subgroup analysis of CSS is carried out according to T stages.ResultsA total of 440 patients met the eligibility criteria. Three hundred and fifty-six(80.9%)patients underwent chemoradiotherapy, and eighty-four (19.1%) patients underwent radical surgery. There were significant differences between patients of radical surgery and CRT groups with regard to the tumor grade, histology and N stage. After PSM, 80 matched pairs (A total of 160 patients) were selected. Multivariable cox regression analysis revealed no difference in the CSS of patients that underwent either radical surgery or CRT before [hazard ratio (HR): 0.955, 95% CI: 0.704–1.295, P = 0.766] and after PSM (HR: 0.767, 95% CI: 0.512–1.149, P = 0.198). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in CSS between patients with radical surgery and CRT groups for all T stages (T 1–4, all P > 0.05).ConclusionsThis analysis revealed that the prognostic outcomes in patients with cervical esophageal cancer were comparable between radical surgery and CRT.

Appendiceal goblet cell carcinoma has marginal advantages from perioperative chemotherapy: a population-based study with an entropy balancing analysis

PurposeThe aim is to clarify the use of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable goblet cell carcinoma (GCC).MethodsA retrospective study was carried out based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results study. The population was divided: into patients who received only radical surgery (group A) and those who received radical surgery plus chemotherapy (group B). An entropy balancing was carried out to correct the imbalance between the two groups. Two models were generated. Model 1 contained only high-risk patients: group B and a “virtual” group A with similar characteristics. Model 2 included only low-risk patients: group A and “virtual” group B with identical attributes. The efficacy of entropy balancing was evaluated with the d value. The overall survival was compared and reported with Hazard Ratio (HR) within a confidence interval of 95% (95 CI).ResultsThe groups A and B were imbalanced for tumor size (d = 0.392), T (d = 1.128), N (d = 1.340), M (d = 1.456), mean number of positive lymph nodes (d = 0.907), and LNR (d = 0.889). Before the balancing, the risk of death was higher in group B than in A (4.3; 2.5 to 7.4). After reweighting, all large differences were eliminated (d < 0.200). In high-risk patients, the risk of death was higher in patients who underwent surgery alone than those who received perioperative chemotherapy (HR 0.5; 0.2 to 1.3) without statistical significance (p = 0.187). In low-risk patients, the risk of death was similar (HR 1.1; 0.3 to 3.3).ConclusionPerioperative chemotherapy could provide some marginal advantages to high-risk patients.

A comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with specific locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IB3, IIA2, IIICr): trial protocol for a randomized controlled study (C-CRAL trial).

At present, clinical dilemma remains to be solved in terms of therapy-choices for specific locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients: 1) Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is recommended as the first choice for them, many patients, influenced by the Chinese culture, prefer to choose radical surgery (RS) as their primary treatment. The difference between the 2 therapies in improving patient prognosis is still unknown. 2) Laparoscopy has been questioned since the noted Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial. Nevertheless, clinical research on laparoscopic surgery under the strict tumor-free principle is still underway globally, therefore whether laparoscopic surgery can be used for specific LACC is also an urgent issue to be explored. A multi-center, randomized controlled study is designed to investigate the effect of different treatment strategies on the prognosis and quality of life (QoL) in patients with specific locally LACC. A total of 402 patients will be enrolled over a period of 3 years. Eligible patients will be randomized (3:1) to either RS group or CCRT group. Patients assigned to RS group will be randomized (1:2) to the abdominal RS group or laparoscopic RS group. All patients will then be followed-up for 5 years. The primary end point is the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points include 5-year PFS, 2-year overall survival (OS), 5-year OS, adverse events caused by RS or CCRT and QoL. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000041315.

Analysis of the Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes of Fertility-sparing Surgery in Ovarian Malignant Sex Cord-stromal Tumours: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

AimsTo assess the difference in survival between fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) and radical surgery and explore pregnancy outcomes after FSS in stage I malignant sex cord-stromal tumours (MSCSTs). Materials and methodsWe carried out a multicentre retrospective cohort study on patients who were diagnosed with MSCSTs and the tumour was confined to one ovary. The patients were divided into FSS and radical surgery groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance variables between the two groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare the difference in disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to find risk factors of DFS. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors of pregnancy. ResultsIn total, 107 patients were included, of whom 54 (50.5%) women underwent FSS and 53 (49.5%) received radical surgery. After IPTW, a pseudo-population of 208 was determined and all of the covariates were well balanced. After a median follow-up time of 50 months (range 7–156 months), 10 patients experienced recurrence and two died. There was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups, both in unweighted (P = 0.969) or weighted cohorts (P = 0.792). In the weighted cohort, stage IC (P = 0.014), tumour diameter >8 cm (P = 0.003), incomplete staging surgery (P = 0.003) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were the four high-risk factors associated with a shorter DFS. Among 14 patients who had pregnancy desire, 11 (78.6%) women conceived successfully; the live birth rate was 76.9%. In univariate analysis, only adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.009) was associated with infertility. ConclusionsOn the premise of complete staging surgery, FSS is safe and feasible in early stage MSCSTs with satisfactory reproductive outcomes.

Impact of surgical management of upper tract urothelial cancer in octogenarians: A population-based study.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an aggressive disease with a high progression rate. The standardmanagement for this disease is nephroureterectomy. Nephron sparing nonradical surgery is an alternative therapeutic approach. In men with limited life expectancy, the potential harm of UTUC progression must be weighed against surgical morbidity and mortality, and thus, more conservative approaches may be selected. This study aims to investigate the comparative benefits of radical and conservative surgical management in patients older than 80 years with localized UTUC. A search was conducted in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients older than 80 years who were diagnosed with localized (T1-2N0M0) cancer in the renal pelvis or ureter as the only malignancy from 2004 to 2015. Patients were divided into 3 therapeutic groups: no surgery, local intervention (ie, local tumor excision or segmented ureterectomy), and radical surgery (nephroureterectomy). Demographic and cancer-related parameter data were collected. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate predictors for surgical treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyze survival outcomes. Data from 774 patients were analyzed, including 205 in the no-surgery group, 181 in the local intervention group, and 388 in the radical surgery group. Older, African American patients with T1 stage disease were less likely to receive surgical treatment. Among surgically treated patients, renal pelvic tumors, and high-grade and T2 stage disease were associated with radical resection. Surgically treated patients had a longer median overall survival (OS) than in those treated nonsurgically (13, 35, and 47 months in no-surgery, local intervention, and radical surgery groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Although surgically treated patients demonstrated higher 5-year OS (8.8% [no surgery], 23.2% [local intervention], and 23.5% [radical surgery], p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) (41.0%[no surgery], 69.1%[local intervention], and 72.9%[radical surgery]; p < 0.001) than in those treated nonsurgically, no significant differences were found between the local intervention and radical surgery groups (p > 0.05). Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, surgical treatments, including both nonradical and radical resection, were independently associated with improved OS and DSS after controlling for age, marital status, tumor grade, and radiation status. Patients older than 80 years with localized UTUC who undergo surgery demonstrate longer survival. Radical and nonradical resections seemto have similar OS and DSS outcomes. Thus, when clinically indicated in this population, a more conservative surgical approach may be reasonable.

Survival and pregnancy outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian malignant sex cord-stromal tumors: A multicenter retrospective study (176)

<b>Objectives:</b> To assess the survival and pregnancy outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in stage I ovarian malignant sex cord-stromal tumors (MSCSTs). <b>Methods:</b> Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) was performed between the FSS and radical surgery (RS) groups. The Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare the categorical variables and disease-free survival (DFS). The binary logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to identify risk factors related to pregnancy and DFS. <b>Results:</b> A total of 107 patients were included, of whom 54 (50.5%) women underwent FSS, and 53 (49.5%) women underwent RS. After IPTW, 208 patients were obtained, and all of the covariates were well balanced. After a median follow-up time of 50 months (range: 7-156 months), there was no significant difference of DFS between the two groups in both unweighted cohort (p=0.969) or weighted cohort (p=0.792). In the weighted cohort, stage IC (p=0.014), tumor diameter >8 cm (p=0.003), without staging surgery (p=0.003), and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P <0.001) were the four high-risk factors associated with a shorter DFS. Among 14 patients who had pregnancy desire, 11 (78.6%) women conceived successfully, and the live birth rate was 76.9%. In univariate analysis, only adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.009) was associated with pregnancy. <b>Conclusions:</b> FSS is safe in stage IA and IC MSCSTs with a satisfactory reproductive outcome on the premise of complete staging surgery.