Radical Resection Group Research Articles

Local vs radical resection of stage I-III rectal cancer in very elderly patients: an exact matched analysis of the National Cancer Database

BackgroundTreatment of elderly cancer patients is challenging as they can be over-treated with respect to frailty or under-treated due to advanced age. Maintaining a good quality of life is essential for this population. This study aimed to assess the difference in overall survival and short-term outcomes according to extent of rectal cancer resection in patients aged ≥80 years. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, very elderly patients with stage I-III rectal cancer aged ≥80 years were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2019). Patients were divided into two groups: radical resection and local excision. The groups were matched using exact matched analysis for clinical T and N stage, tumor size, and neoadjuvant treatment. Main outcome measures were overall survival, hospital stay, 30-day unplanned readmissions, and short-term mortality. Results9634 patients were included (local excision = 2710; radical resection = 6924). After matching, 1106 patients were included in each group with a median follow-up of 49.9 and 51.7 months, respectively. The radical resection group had statistically significantly longer overall survival than did local excision (60 vs. 57.2 months, p=0.026). Local excision was associated with shorter length of stay (1 vs. 7 days. p<0.001), lower 30-day mortality (Odds ratio: 0.43; 95%CI: 0.25- 0.75, p=0.003), lower 90-day mortality (Odds ratio: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.32- 0.68, p<0.001), and lower 30-day readmission (Odds ratio: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.33- 0.74, p<0.001). A subgroup analysis of matched patients with cTis-T2, N0 tumors who underwent curative surgery, revealed similar results. ConclusionsRadical resection of rectal cancer in very elderly patients had a modest survival benefit whereas local excision had lower odds of readmission and short-term mortality.

Parasagittal Meningiomas: The Impact of Sinus Opening and Grade of Resection on Clinical Outcome and Recurrence in a Consecutive Series of Patients

Surgical management of parasagittal meningiomas (PMs) remains controversial in the literature. The need to pursue a resection as radical as possible and the high risk of venous injuries contribute to making the sinus opening a widely argued choice. This study aimed to analyze factors affecting the risk of recurrence and to assess clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgical resection of PMs with conservative or aggressive management of the intrasinusal portion. A single-institution retrospective review of all patients with PM surgically treated between January 2013 and March 2021 was conducted. Among 56 patients, the sinus was opened in 32 patients (57%), and a conservative approach was used in 24 patients (43%). The sinus opening was found to be a predictive factor of radical resection (Simpson grade [SG] I-II) (P= 0.007). SG was the only predictive factor of recurrence (P < 0.001). The radical resection group (SG I-II) showed recurrence-free survival at 72 months of about 90% versus 30% in the non-radical resection group (SG III-IV) (log-rank test= 14.21, P < 0.001). Aggressive management of the sinus and radical resection were not found to be related to permanent deficit (P= 0.214 and P= 0.254) or worsening of Karnofsky performance scale score (P= 0.822 and P= 0.933). Removal of the intrasinusal portion of the tumor using standard procedures is not associated with a higher risk of permanent deficit or worsening of Karnofsky performance scale and reduces the risk of recurrence.

Long-term outcomes of 1–2 cm rectal neuroendocrine tumors after local excision or radical resection: A population-based multicenter study

ObjectivesStudies on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETs) that are 1–2 cm in size are limited, and the optimal treatment for these tumors is not well established. MethodsData from patients with primary localized R-NETs 1–2 cm in size were retrospectively collected from 17 large-scale referral medical centers in China. Long-term prognosis, quality of life (QOL), and fecal incontinence were evaluated, and the effects of local excision (LE) or radical resection (RR) were elucidated using propensity score matching (PSM). ResultsA total of 272 patients were included in this study; 233 underwent LE, and the remaining 39 underwent RR. Patients in the LE group showed lower tumor location, fewer postoperative Clavien–Dindo III–V complications, more G1 tumors, and lower tumor stage. There were no significant differences in the relapse-free survival or overall survival (OS) between the LE and RR groups after PSM. Patients in the LE group reported superior physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive functions, global QOL, and Wexner fecal incontinence scores compared with those in the RR group (all P < 0.050). Eighteen (6.6%) patients had lymph node metastases. Multivariable analysis revealed that tumor location (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–10.07, P = 0.010), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 1.80 (OR = 4.50, 1.46–15.89, P = 0.012), and T3–T4 (OR = 36.31, 95% CI 7.85–208.62, P < 0.001) were independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis. ConclusionsR-NETs measuring 1–2 cm generally have a favorable prognosis, and there is no difference in postoperative survival between LE and RR. For patients without lymph node metastasis, LE should be the preferred choice; however, for patients with a higher tumor location, preoperative NLR >1.8 or T3/T4 tumors, RR should be considered.

Local Excision Versus Radical Resection for Grade 2 Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Studies on grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors are limited, and the optimal treatment for these tumors is not well established. We aimed to compare the oncologic results of local excision versus radical resection for the treatment of grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study to minimize heterogeneity between groups and focus on the differences between surgery strategies. Seventeen large-scale Chinese medical centers participated in this study. A total of 144 patients with pathologically confirmed grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival were assessed to compare surgery strategies. A total of 144 patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven patients underwent endoscopic resection, 55 underwent transanal excision, 50 underwent radical resection, and 12 underwent palliative surgery or biopsy for distant metastasis. Of the 50 patients who underwent radical resection, 30 (60.0%) had clinically positive lymph nodes on the basis of the histopathology results. The optimal cutoff value for tumor size to predict cancer-specific survival was 1.5 cm. In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of ≤1.5-cm size, there were no significant differences in cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival between local excision and radical resection groups ( p > 0.05). In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of >1.5-cm size, relapse-free survival was significantly lower in the local excision group than in the radical resection group ( p = 0.04). The nature of retrospective reviews and a relatively short follow-up period are limitations of this study. Grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors have a nonnegligible rate of lymph node metastasis. Local excision is a feasible choice for tumors of ≤1.5 cm size without metastasis, whereas radical resection is more beneficial in those of >1.5 cm size. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Los estudios sobre los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales de grado 2 son limitados y el tratamiento óptimo para estos tumores no está bien establecido.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados oncológicos de la escisión local versus la resección radical para el tratamiento de tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2.DISEÑO:Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo emparejado por puntuación de propensión para minimizar la heterogeneidad entre grupos y centrarse en la diferencia entre estrategias quirúrgicas.ESCENARIO:Diecisiete centros médicos chinos de gran tamaño participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 patológicamente confirmados.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída para comparar las estrategias quirúrgicas.RESULTADOS:En este estudio se inscribieron un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2. Veintisiete pacientes se sometieron a resección endoscópica, 55 a escisión transanal, 50 a resección radical y 12 a cirugía paliativa o biopsia por metástasis a distancia. De los 50 pacientes que se sometieron a resección radical, 30 (60,0%) tenían ganglios linfáticos clínicamente positivos según los resultados histopatológicos. El valor de corte óptimo para el tamaño del tumor para predecir la supervivencia específica del cáncer fue de 1,5 cm. En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 ≤ 1,5 cm, no hubo diferencias significativas en la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída entre los grupos de escisión local y resección radical ( p >0,05). En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 > 1,5 cm, la supervivencia libre de recaída fue significativamente menor en el grupo de escisión local que en el grupo de resección radical ( p = 0,04).LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza de la revisión retrospectiva y el período de seguimiento relativamente corto son limitaciones de este estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 tienen una tasa no despreciable de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos. La escisión local es una opción factible para tumores ≤ 1,5 cm sin metástasis, mientras que la resección radical es más beneficiosa en aquellos > 1,5 cm. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Survival outcome of local versus radical resection for jejunoileal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score-matched population-based analysis

PurposeSurvival after local resection (LR) versus radical resection (RR) has been revealed comparable for patients with rectal and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but is unknown for jejunoileal (JI) GISTs. This study aimed to compare the long-term survival between patients with JI GISTs who underwent LR and RR, and to find out the prognostic factors for JI GISTs.MethodsPatients diagnosed with JI GISTs in 1975–2019 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and grouped according to surgical modality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the LR and RR groups. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared in the full and matched cohorts using Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis. Subgroup sensitivity analyses were also performed. Risk factors associated with DSS were analyzed in multivariate Cox analysis following model selection.Results1107 patients diagnosed with JI GISTs were included in the study cohort. After PSM, OS and DSS were comparable in LR and RR groups. Consistently, the two groups had similar DSS in all subgroup analyses. Moreover, multivariate Cox analysis identified lymphadenectomy, older age, larger tumor size, distant metastasis, high and unknown mitotic rate, but not LR, as independent prognostic risk factors for JI GISTs.ConclusionsWe conducted the first population-based comparison between the effect of different surgical modes on survival for patients with JI GISTs. LR can be carried out safely without compromising oncological outcome, and should be considered as a treatment option in selected patients with JI GISTs.

Efficacy analysis of surgical combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy for T3 gallbladder carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

Objective: To explore the clinical value of adjuvant therapy in patients with T3 gallbladder cancer (GBC) who have undergone R0 resection. Methods: Clinical and pathological data from 415 patients with T3 GBC who underwent surgical treatment in 7 tertiary centers in China from January 2013 to December 2018 were collected,including 251 males and 164 females,aged (61±11)years (range: 26 to 88 years). Depending on whether to receive adjuvant therapy after radical resection,the patients were divided into the radical resection group alone (group A,n=358) and the radical resection combined with the postoperative adjuvant therapy group (group B,n=57). The general data of the two groups were matched 1∶1 by propensity score matching method,and the caliper value was 0.02.Clinicopathological characteristics,overall survival and disease-free survival of the two groups were compared.The Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis,and patients with at least one or more independent risk factors were classified as high-risk clinicopathological subtypes. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the clinical value of adjuvant therapy after radical resection in patients with high-risk clinicopathological subtypes. Results: After the matching,there were 42 patients in each of the two groups. The incidence of gallbladder cancer and the number of dissected lymph nodes in group B after cholecystectomy were higher than those in group A (χ2=9.224,2.570,both P<0.05). There were no significant differences in overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate between the two groups before and after matching (all P>0.05). The results of the univariate and multivariate analysis showed that CA19-9>39 U/ml,nerve invasion,tumor location (liver side or bilateral),TNM stage ⅢB to ⅣB ,poorly differentiated tumor were independent prognostic factors of overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with T3 stage gallbladder cancer (all P<0.05).Three hundred and twenty-nine patients(79.3%) had high-risk clinicopathological subtypes,and the median survival time after curative resection with and without adjuvant therapy was 17 months and 34 months respectively,and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 40.0%,21.3% and 46.0%,46.0% (χ2=4.042,P=0.044);the median disease-free survival time was 9 months and 13 months,and the 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 23.4%,13.6% and 30.2%,18.2% (χ2=0.992,P=0.319). Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant therapy following radical surgery did not yield significant improvements in the overall survival and disease-free survival rates of patients diagnosed with T3 gallbladder cancer. However, it demonstrated a significant extension in the overall survival rate for patients presenting high-risk clinicopathological subtypes.

Emergency exploratory laparotomy and radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer combined with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent malignant tumor worldwide and ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a frequent complication of GC. Radical gastrectomy and palliative therapy are widely used surgical procedures in the clinical management of GC. This study intends to probe the clinical efficacy and safety of radical gastrectomy and palliative therapy on the basis of exploratory laparotomy in patients with GC combined with UGIB, hoping to provide valuable information to aid patients in selecting the appropriate surgical intervention. To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of exploratory laparotomy + radical gastrectomy and palliative therapy in patients with GC and UGIB combined. A total of 89 GC patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China between July 2018 and July 2020 were selected as participants for this study. The 89 patients were divided into two groups: radical resection group (n = 46) treated with exploratory laparotomy + radical gastrectomy and Palliative group (n = 43) treated with palliative therapy. The study compared several variables between the two groups, including surgical duration, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, postoperative anal exhaust time, off-bed activity time, length of hospitalization, and incidence of complications such as duodenal stump rupture, anastomotic obstruction, and postoperative incision. Additionally, postoperative immune function indicators (including CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+, and CD3+/HLADR+), immunoglobulin (IgG and IgM), tumor markers (CEA, CA199, and CA125), and inflammatory factors (IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α) were assessed. The surgical efficacy and postoperative quality of life recovery were also evaluated. The patients were monitored for survival and tumor recurrence at 6 mo, 1 year, and 2 years post-surgery. The results indicated that the duration of operation time and postoperative hospitalization did not differ between the two surgical procedures. However, patients in the radical resection group exhibited shorter intraoperative blood loss, anus exhaust time, off-bed activity time, and inpatient activity time than those in the Palliative group. Although there was no substantial difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications, such as duodenal stump rupture and anastomotic obstruction, between the radical resection group and Palliative group (P > 0.05), the radical resection group exhibited higher postoperative immune function indicators (including CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, etc.) and immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM) than the Palliative group, while tumor markers and inflammatory factors levels were lower than those in the radical resection group. Additionally, surgical efficacy, postoperative quality of life, and postoperative survival rates were higher in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy than in those who underwent palliative therapy. Moreover, the probability of postoperative tumor recurrence was lower in the radical gastrectomy group compared to the palliative therapy group, and these differences were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared to palliative therapy, exploratory laparotomy + radical gastrectomy can improve immune function, reduce the levels of tumor markers and inflammatory factors, improve surgical efficacy, promote postoperative quality of life recovery, enhance survival rates, and attenuate the probability of tumor recurrence.

Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy.

Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy.

Surgical treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma involving larynx and trachea

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) involving larynx and trachea. Methods: A total of 1 436 cases of thyroid malignant tumors were admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from 2004 to 2019, including 110 cases of PTC involving larynx and trachea, and of which 105 cases with complete follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 42 males and 63 females, with a male/female ratio of 1∶1.5, aged from 28 to 81 years. All lesions involved trachea, including 11 cases involving both trachea and larynx. Of those 83 cases underwent laryngeal and airway wall tumor excision, and 22 cases underwent radical tumor excision plus laryngeal and trachea repair. Extubation rate was analyzed and the postoperative survival curve of patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among 105 cases, 16 cases underwent tracheotomy and 12 cases were successfully extubated. The overall 3- 5- and 10-year survival rates were 100.0%, 86.4% and 72.5%, and the disease-free survival rates were 93.1%, 81.6% and 57.7%, respectively. There was significant difference in survival curve between the two groups (χ2=4.21, P=0.040). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 94.6% and 77.3% in laryngeal and tracheal tumor exclusion group, and 85.7% and 51.4% in the radical tumor resection group. There was no significant difference in the survival curves between the two groups (χ2=3.50, P=0.061). Conclusion: PTC patients with laryngeal and tracheal involvement can achieve long survival and good quality of life through reasonable surgical treatment.

Usefulness of close surveillance for rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

It is controversial whether patients who achieve clinical complete remission (cCR) of rectal cancer should be treated with the “watch and wait” (W&W) or radical resection (RR) strategy. Our study aimed to compare the survival outcomes and ostomy rate of the W&W and RR strategies. Between January 2008 and December 2015, we investigated 26 patients who achieved pathologic complete remission after undergoing RR and 36 patients who adopted the W&W strategy because of cCR. The tumor regrowth, salvage surgery, recurrence, disease-free, and overall survival (OS) rates were assessed. In our study, recurrences occurred in nine and two patients from the W&W and RR groups, respectively. Each patient in the RR group had a temporary or permanent ostomy, but only three (8.3%) had an ostomy in the W&W group. The 5-year recurrence rate was 25.0% in the W&W group and 7.7% in the RR group. Six patients (16.7%) had tumor regrowth in the W&W group, and all were resectable when regrowth. The 5-year OS rates between the two groups were nonsignificant. There is no specific risk factor for recurrence and OS. Under close surveillance, the W&W group achieved similar OS to the RR group and benefited from a lower ostomy rate.

Clinical outcome of local treatment and radical resection for pT1 rectal cancer.

Rectal cancer is mainly cured by radical resection with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant chemotherapy. Pathological T1 lesions can be managed by local treatment and radiotherapy thereafter. Lower morbidity is the key benefit of these local treatments. Since nodal metastasis is important for staging, radical resection (RR) is suggested. Rectal cancer has higher surgical morbidity than colon cancer; local treatment has been the preferred choice by patients. We retrospectively enrolled data of 244 patients with pT1 rectal adenocarcinoma. A total of 202 patients (82.8%) underwent RR, including low anterior resection (LAR) and abdomino-perineal resection (APR), and 42 patients (17.2%) underwent LT, including transanal excision and colonoscopic polypectomy. In our study, seven patients (16.7%) had loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis from the LT group while eight patients (4.0%) had distant metastasis without loco-regional recurrence from the RR group. The lymph node metastasis rate in RR group was 8.4%. Forty-seven patients (24.2%) underwent LAR with temporary stoma, and its reversal rate was 100%. In the RR group, postoperative complication rate was 10.4% with a mortality rate of 0.5%. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95.7% for RR and 80.2% for LT (P = 0.001), and overall survival (OS) was 93.7% for RR and 70.0% for LT (P = 0.001). This study found that RFS and OS in patients of pT1 rectal adenocarcinoma that had received RR were better than receiving LT. Further adjuvant chemotherapy was possible for some RR patients. A higher recurrence rate after LT must be balanced against the morbidity and mortality associated with RR.

Local resection versus radical resection for early-stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The optimal surgical approach for early-stage rectal cancer remains controversial. Radical resection is considered to be the gold standard for rectal cancer treatment. More and more studies show that local resection can replace traditional radical resection in the treatment of early rectal cancer. This research aimed to compare the efficacy of local excision and radical surgery for early-stage rectal cancer and report the evidence-based clinical advantages of both techniques. The clinical trials comparing oncological and perioperative local and radical resection outcomes for early-stage rectal cancer were searched from 7 national and international databases. Finally, 3 randomized controlled trials and 14 cohort studies were included. In terms of oncology and perioperative outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences between the radical resection group and the local resection group in terms of OS (HR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.98, 1.13), DFS [HR = 1.18, 95% CI (0.93, 1.48), p = 0.168), distant metastasis rate (RR = 1.04, 95% CI (0.49, 2.20), p = 0.928), and mortality rate (RR = 1.52, 95% CI (0.80, 2.91), p = 0.200). However, there were significant differences in the outcomes of complications (RR = 2.85, 95% CI (2.07, 3.92), p < 0.001), length of hospital stays (WMD = 5.41, 95% CI (3.94, 6.87), p < 0.001), stoma rate (RR = 7.69, 95% CI (2.39, 24.77), p = 0.001), local recurrence rate (RR = 0.48, 95% CI (0.27, 0.86), p = 0.013), operative time (WMD = 74.68, 95% CI (68.00, 81.36), p < 0.001), blood loss (WMD = 156.36, 95% CI (95.48, 217.21, p < 0.001), and adverse events (RR = 1.59, 95% CI (1.05, 2.41), p = 0.027). Local excision may be a viable alternative to radical resection for early-stage rectal cancer, but higher quality clinical studies are needed to confirm this.

Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of radical resection compared with non-radical resection for vaginal or cervical melanoma.Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of post-operative patients with primary lower genital tract melanoma hospitalised at Peking University Cancer Hospital between Jan 2014 and Dec 2020. The study endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier method-plotted survival curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the factors associated with RFS and OS, and to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).Results: A total of 80 patients were included. Thirty-one patients had received non-radical resection, and 49 patients had received radical resection. The median patient age was 55.5 (IQR 45.3–60.0) years. Sixty-two (77.5%) patients had vaginal melanoma. Sixty-four patients (80.0%) had received post-operative adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 36.0 months (95% CI 10.1–62.1 months). Sixty-four patients developed recurrence, and 44 patients died. The median RFS (mRFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.4–8.6 m), and the RFS for the radical resection group was longer than that for the non-radical resection group (9.5 vs. 5.3 m), with no significant difference (P > 0.05). The median OS (mOS) was 25.9 months (95% CI 14.4–37.4 m). The mOS was 24.6 months (95% CI 10.3–38.9 m) and 25.9 months (95% CI 10.9–40.9 m) in the non-radical resection group and the radical resection group, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that surgical approach, infiltration depth of the tumour, lymph node metastasis, and post-operative adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for RFS and that post-operative adjuvant therapy was an independent risk factor for OS.Conclusion: By performing multivariate analysis, which corrected for potential confounding factors, we identified surgical procedures that were associated with RFS, and we found that RFS and OS in patients with vaginal melanoma and cervical melanoma benefitted from post-operative adjuvant therapy.

The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

This study aims to oncologic outcomes of the watch-and-wait (WW) strategy compared with radical resection (RR). Patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and achieved ≤ycT2 between 2008 and 2016 were included. The mean follow-up time was 61 months (range, 0-168 months). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. A total of 446 patients were included, and WW was adopted for 34 patients. WW patients were older (P = 0.022) and less advanced initial cT stage (P = 0.004). Ten patients in the WW group (29.4%) experienced local regrowth. Later, distant metastases occurred in 7 of these patients. The 5-year RFS (74.1% vs. 79.5%), DMFS (74.1% vs. 81.6%), and OS (90.4% vs. 87.7%) for the WW and RR groups were not statistically different. However, LRFS in the WW group was significantly lower (65.1% vs. 97.0%, P < 0.001). The initial cT stage was associated with RFS (P = 0.019) and LRFS (P = 0.037). WW was an independent risk factor for LRFS (P < 0.001) and DMFS (P = 0.024). After 1:4 propensity score matching between the WW and RR groups, there was no difference in RFS and OS. However, the 5-year LRFS (67.5% vs. 96.5%) and DMFS (73.2% vs. 86.4%) demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the groups. By appointing the WW strategy, oncologic safety was not ensured. The WW strategy must be implemented with caution in patients with ≤ycT2 stage, particularly those with advanced initial cT stage.

Comparable survival benefit of local excision versus radical resection for 10- to 20-mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors

ObjectiveThe optimal surgical management for 10- to 20-mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNET) is still a matter of debate. This study aimed to explore the optimal surgical approach for 10- to 20-mm RNET by comparing the outcomes between local excision and radical resection. MethodWe extracted clinicopathological information of 10- to 20-mm RNET from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance the imbalanced baseline covariates (P < 0.05) between the local excision group and radical resection group. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the risk factors associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). ResultA total of 531 RNET patients 10–20 mm in size were included. Patients receiving radical resection had larger tumor sizes (P < 0.001), higher T stages (P < 0.001), higher N stages (P < 0.001), higher M stages (P = 0.002) and higher grades (P = 0.041). For 10–20 mm RNET patients, radical resection had no survival benefit compared with local excision (CSS: HR = 2.048, 95% CI 0.553–7.576, P = 0.283; OS: HR = 1.090, 95% CI 0.535–2.219, P = 0.813). After 1:2 PSM, there was no significant difference between local excision and radical resection. Radical resection still had no survival benefit over local excision (CSS: HR = 0.449, 95% CI 0.050–4.022, P = 0.474; OS: HR = 1.408, 95% CI 0.488–4.061, P = 0.527). In a multivariate analysis of CSS, age >60 years old (P = 0.005), tumour size 14–20 mm (P = 0.011) and M1 stage (P < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for worse CSS. In multivariate analysis of OS, age>60 years (P＜0.001), male sex (P = 0.007), black race (P = 0.016), and T2/T3/T4 stage (P = 0.007) were significantly associated with worse OS. N stage was not an independent predictive factor for CSS and OS. ConclusionThis study revealed that for 10- to 20-mm RNET patients, there was no survival benefit for radical resection compared with local excision, which suggested that local excision may be an adequate treatment for these patients.

Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates.

Simple SummaryRectal cancer with good clinical response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) have shown favorable outcomes. As favorable oncologic outcomes in patients with good response to PCRT emerged, it dawned on many colorectal surgeons that the rectum can be saved without compromising the prognosis of rectal cancer. However, evidence was not sufficient yet, and it was necessary to determine the factors associated with oncologic outcomes after local excision. The purpose of our study was to compare the oncologic outcomes between local excision and radical resection in ypT0-1 patients and verify the oncologic safety of local excision. Our study provides valid surgery principles by analyzing the prognostic factors of each strategy, further reinforcing the evidence of rectum sparing treatment for rectal cancer patients.Tumors with good response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy have a favorable prognosis, and these findings raise interest in rectum-sparing strategies. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcome between local excision and radical resection in ypT0-1 patients and to analyze prognostic factors. Patients with primary rectal cancer diagnosed with ypT0-1 after PCRT followed by either radical resection (RR) or local excision (LE) between 2005 and 2014 were included in this study (LE = 78, RR = 442). Clinicopathologic features, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and OS were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in the RFS and OS between the LE and RR groups. Clinical T stage (cT3-4) before PCRT was related to RFS and in the LE group (p = 0.022). Lymph node metastasis (HR: 4.884, 95% confidence interval: 2.451–9.732, p < 0.001) in the final pathology was the only factor associated with RFS, showing a statistically significant difference in the RR group. Lymph node metastasis and age were associated with OS in the RR group. This study confirms the oncologic feasibility of LE in ypT0-1 rectal cancer after PCRT. Additionally, careful patient selection with higher accuracy modalities should be updated to improve treatment outcomes of LE.

A Distinct Clinicopathological Feature and Prognosis of Young Gastric Cancer Patients Aged ≤ 45 Years Old.

PurposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to probe into clinicopathological features and prognosis of early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) patients aged ≤ 45 years old.MethodsThis study selected 154 young gastric cancer patients aged ≤ 45 years old and 158 elderly gastric cancer patients aged > 50 years old admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University in 2009-2019 as the research object. These patients were further divided into two groups according to whether tumor can be resected radically. The following parameters were analyzed: age, gender, helicobacter pylori (HP) infection status, Her-2 status, pathological type and stage, chemotherapy, tumor differentiation degree, overall survival (OS).ResultsMore than 3,000 patients with gastric carcinoma were screened, and 154 young gastric cancer patients aged ≤ 45 years old were identified as EOGC. Among them, the number of female patients in EOGC group was significantly higher than that of males, accounting for 63.6%. In addition, EOGC were associated with diffuse Laur´en type and poorly differentiated tumors. Interestingly, the Kaplan–Meier method showed that the OS of unresectable EOGC group was significantly lower than that of unresectable LOGC group (P = 0.0005) and chemotherapy containing paclitaxel tended to be more effective in the young people (P = 0.0511). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in OS between young and elderly patients with gastric cancer in the radical resection group (P = 0.3881).ConclusionEOGC patients have a worse prognosis than late-onset gastric cancer (LOGC) patients with advanced unresectable gastric cancer. Palliative surgery or chemotherapy containing paclitaxel may improve the OS of unresectable young individuals with gastric cancer. Additional randomized controlled trials are required for guiding clinical practice.

Recurrence and disease-free survival outcomes after computed tomography-guided needle biopsy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer patients in China: a propensity score matching analysis.

Whether preoperative biopsy before radical resection can lead to recurrence and impact patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. In this study, we carried out a retrospective analysis to determine whether preoperative biopsy can cause disease recurrence and influence disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage IA NSCLC. Patients diagnosed with stage IA NSCLC (solid nodule) between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified from the databases of 7 Chinese medical centers and divided into two groups: a preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided needle biopsy (CTNB) plus radical resection group, and a non-CTNB group. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to balance the observed covariates, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis. Cox regression was used in a single-factor analysis to identify the factors affecting DFS in stage IA NSCLC. After initial screening, 730 patients were enrolled in this study, with 186 and 544 patients in the CTNB group and the non-CTNB group, respectively. After PSM, 186 patients were eventually included in each group. No significant differences in basic clinical features were identified between the two groups (P>0.05). The rates of recurrence were 17.2% and 14.0% in the CTNB and non-CTNB groups (χ2=0.735, P=0.391), respectively. No notable differences in DFS (χ2=1.895, P=0.173) or overall survival (OS, χ2=1.785, P=0.182) were observed. Lung adenocarcinoma [hazard ratio (HR), 0.167, P=0.001] and lesion size (>2 cm) (HR, 2.712, P=0.000) were identified as risk factors for DFS in stage IA NSCLC. CTNB does not increase the incidence of recurrence in stage IA NSCLC or affect patient survival; therefore, it is not a risk factor for DFS. Lung adenocarcinoma and lesion size are risk factors for DFS.

Various surgical strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma located in caudate lobe

Caudate lobes are anatomically located between the hepatic hilum and inferior vena cava. Isolated caudate lobectomy is still a challenging procedure for hepatobiliary pancreas surgeons because it is quite complicated depending on the relationship between the surrounding major vascular structures and the biliary tract. In this study, we introduce a various surgical strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma located in the caudate lobe, and report the results. From January 2005 to December 2015, 35 patients who underwent caudate lobectomy due to hepatocellular carcinoma in Seoul National University Hospital were enrolled. We described several surgical strategies with hanging maneuver and compared the clinical outcomes between the radical resection group and the local resection group. A total of 35 patients underwent hepatectomy including the caudate lobe. The median follow-up period was 86.7 months (3.8-183.6 months). There was 2 (5.7%) extended right hemihepatectomy, 2 (5.7%) extended left hemihepatectomy, 2 (5.7%) right posterior sectionectomy including caudate lobe, 12 (34.3%) cases of isolate caudate lobectomy, and 15 (42.9%) cases of local tumorectomy (non-anatomical). There was no statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, hospital stay, and complication rate (mean, 247.1 ± 104.7 minutes vs. 247.1 ± 104.7 minutes, p = 0.729; mean, 10.2 ± 6.68 days vs. 10.2 ± 6.14 days, p = 1.000). The rates of recurrence were significantly lower in the radical resection groups than in the local resection group (13/15, 86.7% vs. 10/20, 50.0%; p = 0.034). Various surgical strategies are necessary to resect caudate tumors depending on the location and degree of invasion. These several methods would be helpful to reduce recurrence without complications.

Role of Removed Lymph Nodes on the Prognosis of M0 Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis from SEER Database

BackgroundCurrent studies on the number of removed lymph nodes (LNs) and their prognostic value in small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) are limited. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of removed LNs for SBNETs. MethodsSBNET patients without distant metastasis from 2004 to 2017 in the SEER database were included. The optimal cutoff values of examined LNs (ELNs) and negative LNs (NLNs) were calculated by the X-tile software. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to match patients 1:1 on clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression model were used to evaluate the prognostic effect of removed LNs. ResultsThe cutoff values of 14 for ELNs and 9 for NLNs could well distinguish patients with different prognoses. After 1:1 PSM, the differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups were significantly reduced (all P > 0.05). Removal of more than one LN significantly improved the prognosis of the patients (P < 0.001). The number of lymphatic metastasis in the sufficiently radical resection group (SRR, 3.74 ± 3.278, ELN > 14 and NLN > 9) was significantly more than that in the insufficiently radical resection group (ISRR, 2.72 ± 3.19, ELN < 14 or NLN < 9). The 10-year overall survival (OS) of the SRR was significantly better than that of the ISRR (HR = 1.65, P = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.24–2.19). ConclusionBoth ELNs and NLNs can well predict the OS of patients. Systematic removal of more than 14 LNs and more than 9 NLNs can increase the OS of SBNET patients.