Radical Neck Dissection Group Research Articles

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment.

Neck Dissection's Burden on the Patient: Functional and Psychosocial Aspects in 1,652 Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas

In this study of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, the authors sought to clarify the functional and psychosocial harms of neck dissection (ND), which lessens quality of life. The study included questionnaire responses from patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (n= 1,652) and clinicians (n= 1,489), as collected in the DÖSAK Rehab Study. Psychosocial and functional factors were assessed. Functional and psychosocial outcomes in patients who did not receive ND were compared with those in patients who underwent selective supraomohyoid ND (SND), modified radical ND (MND), and radical ND (RND). Patients with ND had lower quality of life than those without ND. Burdens after SND (n= 923) were generally lesser than those after MND (n= 301) or RDN (n= 678). There were meaningful differences between the SND, MND, and RND and without-ND groups in impairments in speech intelligibility for strangers and familiar persons, ingestion and swallowing, tongue mobility, opening of the mouth, lower jaw mobility, neck mobility, and shoulder and arm movement (P < .05). Many patients with ND faced a lower functional status and negative professional and financial consequences. Because of the burdens associated with ND, the decision to perform this treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma should incorporate information on health-related quality of life and survival rates.

Shoulder morbidity after pectoralis major flap reconstruction

Donor site morbidity of pectoralis major pedicled flap (PMPF) is scarcely studied. A cross-sectional study on patients who underwent reconstructive surgery with a PMPF at least 6 months before was performed. Patients with a similar type neck dissection on both sides and PMPF on one side (n = 9) were assigned to group 1; patients with neck dissection and PMPF (n = 26) were assigned to group 2; and neck dissection only (n = 47) were assigned to group 3. All 3 groups filled out a shoulder disability questionnaire and underwent shoulder function tests. Pain of the shoulder was rated on a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were also asked if they had experienced stiffness of the shoulder during the previous week. Range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder was examined by one single examiner using an inclinometer, in accord with a standardized protocol. Radical neck dissection (RND), modified radical neck dissection (MRND), and selective neck dissection (SND) sides were separately analyzed. In group 2, shoulder morbidity was experienced more often (p = .065) than in group 3, particularly at the sides where an SND was performed (p = .010). Significant differences in prevalence of shoulder stiffness between PMPF and neck dissection sides and neck dissection only sides were found in the RND (p = .001) and MRND (p = .004) groups, but not in the SND group. A lower ROM of abduction (p = .026) was found in group 2 as compared to group 3. Patients frequently have additional shoulder morbidity after PMPF harvest, particularly after SND. PMPF harvest adds to impairment of abduction. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38:1221-1228, 2016.

Measurement of the trapezius muscle volume: A new assessment strategy of shoulder dysfunction after neck dissection for the treatment of head and neck cancers

The purpose of this study was to determine the actual degree of shoulder muscle change and its relation to symptoms after neck dissection for head and neck cancers. Forty-two patients who underwent unilateral neck dissection were selected. Data obtained from each subject were trapezius muscle volume ratio and a Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) score. Patients who had undergone neck dissection with spinal accessory nerve (SAN) preservation were compared with those who had received radical neck dissection. The preservation group was further separated into subgroups by the extent of neck dissection. Trapezius muscle volume ratio was higher and SDQ score was significantly lower in the SAN preservation group compared to the radical neck dissection group. However, the SAN preservation subgroups did not differ from each other. In addition, a good correlation between the muscle volume ratio and SDQ score was observed. With trapezius muscle volume ratio, clinicians may be able to diagnose shoulder dysfunction after neck dissection. Further research on the subject is warranted. This suggests a novel strategy for assessing the degree of shoulder dysfunction.

Can enough lymph nodes be taken out through lateral neck dissection in patients with larynx cancer?

This study aims to evaluate whether the number of lymph nodes which are dissected by lateral neck dissection (LND) is enough and to compare the number of lymph nodes which are dissected from the same lymph node regions by radical and type 1 modified radical neck dissection (RND). Between January 2000 and June 2004, data of 98 neck dissection materials which were performed to 63 patients (52 males, 11 females; mean age 61.9 years; range 48 to 75 years) with larynx cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The number of lymph nodes taken from the second, third and fourth regions of radical and type 1 modified RND and LND were individually and totally compared. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification system was used for primary tumor and neck metastasis classification, while the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center classification system was used for the classification of cervical lymphatic chain. Two patients (3.17%) had subglottic, 19 (30.15%) had glottic, and 42 (66.66%) had supraglottic lesions. A total of 732 lymph nodes were removed from three regions in RND group, while 1042 lymph nodes were removed in LND group. Our study results showed that the number of lymph nodes removed by LND was sufficient and RBD was not superior in terms of the number of lymph nodes removed.

How many nodes are needed to stage a neck? A critical appraisal

Reliable staging of the neck is an important factor for the estimation of prognosis of head and neck cancer patients. A total of 608 patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas treated from March 1975 to December 2000 were enrolled. In radical neck dissection (RND) group, the number of lymph nodes ranged from 6 to 116; while in selective neck dissection (SND) group, from 1 to 87 (P < 0.001). In SND group, the number of metastatic nodes ranged from 0 to 8 nodes, while in RND group, from 0 to 47 (P < 0.001). The number of dissected lymph nodes correlates with the presence of positive nodes (P = 0.001). In RND group, this correlation is described by the equation Y = -0.0117X (2) + 1.7262X. Factors affecting neck metastasis were number of dissected nodes (P < 0.001), lymphatic embolization (P = 0.044) and neural invasion (P = 0.030). In SND group, this equation is Y = -0.012X (2) + 1.5102X; the number of dissected nodes (P = 0.002) and lymphatic embolization (P = 0.001) were significant for metastasis finding. For patients with tumors at stages I and II, a significant impact on survival and neck recurrence rates were observed. In conclusion, we report the importance of the number of retrieved nodes in likelihood of positive cervical node finding. Node yield is an important factor in oral cancer staging, and, more important, in early stage carcinomas, it is associated with survival and recurrence rates.

Is the type of dissection in lateral neck metastasis for differentiated thyroid carcinoma important?

This study was to compare the types of therapeutic neck dissection in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Sixty-one patients with lymph node metastasis in the neck, treated between 1997 and 2001, were studied retrospectively. A comparative study was made of a selective lateral neck dissection group and a radical or modified radical neck dissection group for recurrence, disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Type of dissection was not related to DFS (P=0.92), OS (P=0.33), and local recurrence ratio (P=0.56). The factors affecting local recurrence were the age over 45 years (P=0.02), tumor size (0.005), and the presence of distant metastasis (P=0.04). The factors affecting DFS and OS were tumor size (0.003), thyroid capsule invasion (0.004). Determination of the type of therapeutic neck dissection depends on patient and tumor characteristics. Selective lateral neck dissection can be applied safely in selected cases.

Spinal accessory nerve function after neck dissections

The aim of this study was to evaluate spinal accessory nerve function after functional neck dissection (FND) and radical neck dissection (RND) by monitoring the nerve with electromyographic (EMG) examinations. A prospective, double-blind, clinical study was undertaken in 21 patients (42 neck side dissections) operated on for head and neck malignant diseases, separated into two groups: 10 neck sides in the RND group and 32 neck sides in the FND group. Electromyographic examinations were performed pre-operatively and post-operatively in the third week and third and ninth months. Additionally, a questionnaire, modified from the neck dissection impairment index, was applied to all the patients in order to assess shoulder function in the ninth post-operative month. All patients had maximum EMG scores pre-operatively. Following the operation, motor amplitudes decreased in both groups. At the third post-operative month, amplitudes decreased to their lowest values. As expected, the decreases in amplitude and EMG score were more prominent in the RND group. Following reinnervation, the amplitudes of the trapezius motor response increased in the FND group but never reached pre-operative values (during the time of follow up). The FND group scores for pain, neck and shoulder stiffness, and disability in heavy object lifting, light object lifting and reaching overhead were significantly lower than those of the RND group. In FND, one aims to preserve anatomically the spinal accessory nerve, and it is presumed to be intact after the procedure. However, using EMG nerve function monitoring, our study revealed that profound spinal nerve injury was detected immediately after FND surgery, which tended to improve over subsequent months but had not regained its original function by the end of the ninth post-operative month.

Shoulder function after accessory nerve-sparing neck dissections.

This study was designed to observe the effect of preserving the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) during neck dissection (ND) and adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after ND on shoulder function. Fifty-seven patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone primary tumor resection and various types of NDs were enrolled in this prospective study. Postoperative shoulder joint range of motion was evaluated by goniometry, and muscle strength was measured manually. SAN function was evaluated with electromyography (EMG) with respect to percentage of denervation and presence of neurogenic involvement. Patients were grouped by treatment as follows: radical ND (RND) versus modified radical ND (MRND)/selective ND (SND) and ART versus no ART. Shoulder joint range of motion and shoulder muscle strength were significantly better in the MRND/SND group than in the RND group. However, EMG findings were similar in the RND and MRND/SND groups. When all patients who underwent ND, RND, or MRND/SND were compared with the control group, statistically significant changes in shoulder joint range of motion and shoulder muscle strength were found. Also, denervation and neurogenic involvement of the SAN were significantly higher after all NDs than in the control group. ART did not affect range of motion of the shoulder joint, shoulder muscle strength, or the degree of denervation and neurogenic involvement in any of the ND groups. ART does not have a negative effect on shoulder function after ND. SAN is always functionally impaired even if we preserve it macroscopically during ND.

Impact of neck dissection on quality of life.

For decades, the gold standard for treatment of cervical metastasis was radical neck dissection (RND). Current oncologic philosophy allows for treatment of appropriately staged neck disease with modified radical neck dissection (MRND) or selective neck dissection (SND). The purposes of this study were to determine the impact of various forms of neck dissection on patients' quality of life (QOL) and to evaluate the responsiveness of the University of Washington (UW) QOL shoulder domain. Prospective accumulation of QOL data from patients treated for head and neck cancer at UW. Eighty-four patients were identified from the UW QOL registry who had undergone neck dissection and had completed pretreatment and posttreatment QOL questionnaires at 6 and 12 months. Compared with pretreatment scores, the MRND and RND groups reported worse shoulder function at 6 and 12 months (P<.0005). The MRND group reported greater shoulder disability at 6 months compared with the SND group (P = .002), but by 12 months, there was no difference between the two groups. Shoulder function for the RND group was worse than the SND group at 6 and 12 months (P = .004). There was a trend toward decreased pain after treatment in the SND and MRND groups. There were no significant differences in subjective appearance, activity, recreation, chewing, swallowing, or speech in the three groups after treatment. Consistent with findings of published functional studies, this study confirmed that the three forms of neck dissection affect patients' QOL differently. This study demonstrates that the UW QOL shoulder domain is a responsive instrument in assessing the effect of neck dissection on shoulder function.

QT interval changes following neck dissection. A stratified prospective study.

Studies from Europe have suggested that neck dissection, especially right radical neck dissection, causes a dangerous prolongation of the QT interval. Sudden cardiac arrest due to QT prolongation has been reported following right radical neck dissection. We investigated the prevalence of QT interval prolongation following neck dissection. Electrocardiogram tracings from 45 patients who underwent different combinations of neck dissection were studied. Preoperative and postoperative tracings were interpreted by a cardiologist blinded to the patient identification of each tracing. There were 28 unilateral neck dissection patients and 17 bilateral neck dissection patients eligible for analysis. There were 7 patients in the classic right radical neck dissection group, and only 3 of these had no neck dissection on the left. Comparisons of preoperative versus postoperative corrected QT interval for all subjects did not indicate a significant change. Stratification by neck dissection type (radical, modified or selective, and carotid artery resection) or by side dissected (left, right, or both) also showed no significant differences. No malignant arrhythmias were encountered. Thus, in contrast to the European experience, our findings show no significant predictable change in the QT interval after any of the combinations of neck dissection. Head and neck surgeons should be aware of the possibility of postoperative QT interval prolongation following neck dissection, although in the absence of other risk factors it appears to be a rare occurrence.

The role of comprehensive neck dissection with preservation of the spinal accessory nerve in the clinically positive neck

The most significant prognostic factor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is the presence of cervical nodal metastases. Radical neck dissection is the standard by which all cervical lymphadenectomy procedures are judged. In the presence of clinically positive nodal metastasis, the benefit of preserving the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) has to be weighed against the possible risk of increased failure in the neck. We performed this retrospective study to determine if preservation of the SAN in patients with clinically evident nodal metastases was associated with increased risk of failure in the dissected neck. Between January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1991, 378 comprehensive neck dissections were performed in 366 patients with clinically and pathologically positive nodal metastases from squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. We compared survival, neck control rates, and other factors in patients who had a classic radical neck dissection (RND) to those who had modified radical neck dissection sparing only the SAN (MRND I). Actuarial 5-year survival and neck failure rates for the RND group were 63% and 12%, compared to 71% and 8% for the MRND I group (P = NS). Survival and neck failure were not statistically different between the MRND I and RND groups when the analysis controlled for pathologic N stage, presence of extra capsular spread, and the presence of pathologically demonstrated metastatic nodes along the course of the SAN. Nor were there significantly different patterns of neck failure with RND versus MRND. Modification RND to preserve an uninvolved SAN in the clinically positive neck does not adversely affect survival or neck control.

Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in early carcinoma of the oral tongue

A prospective, randomized trial was carried out to assess the value of elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Disease-free survival (median follow-up 20 months) was 52 percent versus 63 percent in patients who underwent hemiglossectomy alone and those who underwent hemiglossectomy and radical neck dissection, respectively (difference not statisti cally significant). Patients with a tumor depth of less than 4 mm did significantly better than those with a tumor depth of greater than 4 mm; they were also more likely to have uninvolved nodes at elective radical neck dissection compared with thost with a tumor depth of greater than 4 mm. However, when the survival rates of patients in the two treatment groups were compared with respect to a tumor depth of 4 mm, there was no significant difference between the hemiglossectomy and the hemiglossectomy and radical neck dissection groups. A policy of interval elective radical neck dissection only in those with a tumor depth of greater than 4 mm may optimize cure rates and avoid neck dissection in those unlikely to develop neck recurrence.

Cable grafting of the spinal accessory nerve for rehabilitation of shoulder function after radical neck dissection

From January 1981 through December 1985, 9 patients underwent radical neck dissection with sacrifice of the spinal accessory nerve for removal of metastatic cancer to cervical nodes followed by reconstruction of the spinal accessory nerve utilizing a cable graft from the greater auricular nerve. Shoulder function on the operated side was assessed postoperatively using a subjective questionnaire, objective strength testing, and EMG recordings. The group that had cable grafts of the spinal accessory nerve were compared to a group who had modified radical neck dissection with preservation of the spinal accessory nerve, and to a third group that had classical radical neck dissection with sacrifice of the spinal accessory nerve and no cable graft reconstruction. The group with cable grafts scored in a position intermediate between the modified neck dissection group and the classical radical neck dissection group on subjective and objective testing. Most of the patients with cable grafts demonstrated voluntary motor potentials in the trapezius muscle on postoperative EMG testing. Cable grafting of the spinal accessory nerve sacrificed during radical neck dissection results in improved shoulder function in the postoperative period. Indications and contraindications for the use of this rehabilitative procedure are presented.