Radiation Sensitivity In Patients Research Articles

Increased Radiation Sensitivity in Patients with Phelan-McDermid Syndrome.

Phelan-McDermid syndrome is an inherited global developmental disorder commonly associated with autism spectrum disorder. Due to a significantly increased radiosensitivity, measured before the start of radiotherapy of a rhabdoid tumor in a child with Phelan-McDermid syndrome, the question arose whether other patients with this syndrome also have increased radiosensitivity. For this purpose, the radiation sensitivity of blood lymphocytes after irradiation with 2Gray was examined using the G0 three-color fluorescence in situ hybridization assay in a cohort of 20 patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome from blood samples. The results were compared to healthy volunteers, breast cancer patients and rectal cancer patients. Independent of age and gender, all but two patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome showed significantly increased radiosensitivity, with an average of 0.653 breaks per metaphase. These results correlated neither with the individual genetic findings nor with the individual clinical course, nor with the respective clinical severity of the disease. In our pilot study, we saw a significantly increased radiosensitivity in lymphocytes from patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome, so pronounced that a dose reduction would be recommended if radiotherapy had to be performed. Ultimately, the question arises as to the interpretation of these data. There does not appear to be an increased risk of tumors in these patients, since tumors are rare overall. The question, therefore, arose as to whether our results could possibly be the basis for processes, such as aging/preaging, or, in this context, neurodegeneration. There are no data on this so far, but this issue should be pursued in further fundamentally based studies in order to better understand the pathophysiology of the syndrome.

Expression of HER2 and BRCA1 Correlates with Prognosis in Patients with Breast Cancer After Radiotherapy: A Case-Control Study.

Background: This study aims to explore the associations of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) expression levels with prognosis and radiation sensitivity in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Breast cancer tissues, adjacent normal breast tissues, and benign breast lesions were initially obtained from 256 breast cancer patients as well as an additional 245 patients with breast lesions. Reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was conducted to assess the expression of HER2 and BRCA1 in the collected tissues. Immunohistochemistry was performed to examine HER2 and BRCA1-positive expression levels in the tissues. The relationship between HER2 and BRCA1 expression levels and radiation sensitivity as well breast cancer prognosis was assessed by the Spearman correlation analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Compared with adjacent normal breast tissues and benign breast lesions, the breast cancer tissues exhibited high expression of HER2 mRNA and protein, and low expression of BRCA1 mRNA and protein. Patients with positive HER2 expression had a significantly shorter survival time, and survival time of patients with positive BRCA1 expression was markedly longer, which were consistent with RT-qPCR results. After radiotherapy, the local failure rate of HER2-positive patients was higher than that of the negative ones, while that of BRCA1-positive patients was lower than that of the negative ones. Conclusions: This study suggested that breast cancer patients with high HER2 expression and low BRCA1 expression were less sensitive to radiotherapy with poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Evaluation of Radiation Sensitivity in Patients with Hyper IgM Syndrome

ABSTRACT Background HIGM syndrome is a rare form of primary immunodeficiencies characterized by normal/increased amounts of serum IgM and decreased serum levels of other switched immunoglobulin classes. Since the affected patients are continuously infected with various types of pathogens and are susceptible for cancers, diagnostic and therapeutic tests including imaging techniques are recommended for the diagnosis and treatment of these patients, which predispose them to higher accumulated doses of radiation. Given the evidence of class switching recombination machinery defect and its association with an increased rate of DNA repair, we aimed to evaluate radiation sensitivity among a group of patients diagnosed with HIGM syndrome. Methods 19 HIGM patients (14 CD40 L and 3 AID deficiencies and 2 unsolved cases without known genetic defects) and 17 control subjects (10 healthy subjects as negative control group, 7 ataxia-telangiectasia patients as positive control group) were enrolled. G2 assay was carried out for the determination of radiosensitivity. Results Based on radiation-induced chromosomal changes among the studied HIGM patients and their comparison with the controls, almost all (95%) the patients had degrees of radiosensitivity: 6 patients with low to moderate, 1 patient with moderate, 11 patients with severe and 1 patient without radiation sensitivity. Conclusion Today, X-ray radiation plays a very important role in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; while increased exposure has devastating effects especially in radiosensitive patients. Considering higher sensitivity in HIGM patients, utilizing radiation-free techniques could partly avoid unnecessary and high-level exposure to radiation, thus preventing or reducing its harmful effects on the affected patients.

KORTUC Phase II - Intra-tumoural Radiation Sensitizer in Patients With Locally Advanced/Recurrent Breast Cancer

KORTUC Phase II - Intra-tumoural Radiation Sensitizer in Patients With Locally Advanced/Recurrent Breast Cancer

Diabetes and pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Most of the patients are diagnosed in the metastatic staging. Consolidated risk factors include chronic pancreatitis, smoking and family history. Although controversial, diabetes mellitus has been increasingly associated with pancreatic cancer as a risk factor as opposed to just a manifestation of the disease. Biomarkers for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer among diabetic patients and metformin as a biologic therapy for pancreatic cancer are herein discussed. Review of the literature and evaluation of two Abstracts (#180 and #253) from the 2014 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium focusing on pancreatic adenocarcinoma and diabetes diagnosis and therapeutics. Abstract #180 discusses the role of metabolic biomarkers in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer among diabetic patients, especially recently diagnosed. Abstract #253 debates metformin as a candidate radiosensitizer for pancreatic cancer, although it fails to reject its null hypothesis. Search for methods that can identify pancreatic cancer patients among new-onset diabetic patients could result in early diagnosis of this lethal disease. Metformin is a target therapy that increases median overall survival but is not a radiation sensitizer in patients with pancreatic cancer who present with diabetes.

Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) Modulates Oncogenic Features and Radiation Sensitivity in Endometrial Cancer

BackgroundYes-associated protein (YAP) is a transcriptional co-activator and regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis. We investigated the clinical and biological significance of YAP in endometrial cancer (EMCA).MethodsYAP expression in 150 primary tumor tissues from patients with EMCA was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and its association with clinicopathological data was assessed. The biological functions of YAP were determined in EMCA cell lines through knockdown/overexpression of YAP. The role of YAP in modulating radiation sensitivity was also investigated in EMCA cells.ResultsIncreased nuclear YAP expression was significantly associated with higher grade, stage, lympho-vascular space invasion, postoperative recurrence/metastasis and overall survival in estrogen mediated EMCA, called type 1 cancer (p = 0.019, = 0.028, = 0.0008, = 0.046 and = 0.015, respectively). In multivariate analysis, nuclear YAP expression was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in type 1 EMCA. YAP knockdown by siRNA resulted in a significant decrease in cell proliferation (p<0.05), anchorage-dependent growth (p = 0.015) and migration/invasion (p<0.05), and a significant increase in the number of cells in G0/G1 phase (p = 0.002). Conversely, YAP overexpression promoted cell proliferation. Clonogenic assay demonstrated enhanced radiosensitivity by approximately 36% in YAP inhibited cells.ConclusionsSince YAP functions as a transcriptional co-activator, its differential localization in the nucleus of cancer cells and subsequent impact on cell proliferation could have important consequences with respect to its role as an oncogene in EMCA. Nuclear YAP expression could be useful as a prognostic indicator or therapeutic target and predict radiation sensitivity in patients with EMCA.

The contribution of cetuximab in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.

Recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) continues to be a source of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Agents that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have demonstrated beneficial effects in this setting. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against the EGFR, improves locoregional control and overall survival when used as a radiation sensitizer in patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC undergoing definitive radiation therapy with curative intent. Cetuximab is also active as monotherapy in patients whose cancer has progressed on platinum-containing therapy. In the first-line setting for incurable HNSCC, cetuximab added to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improves overall survival compared with standard chemotherapy alone. These positive results have had a significant impact on the standard of care for advanced HNSCC. In this review, we will discuss the mechanism of action, clinical data and common toxicities that pertain to the use of cetuximab in the treatment of advanced incurable HNSCC.

183 Can an In Vitro Assay Predict Radiation Sensitivity in Patients with Carcinoma of the Prostate?

183 Can an In Vitro Assay Predict Radiation Sensitivity in Patients with Carcinoma of the Prostate?

Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer: What Next?

In this issue, Lanciano et al report the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group’s most recent randomized study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer (GOG-165). This trial, which compared the results of radiation therapy delivered concurrently with either weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil (FU), was closed well before the planned accrual goal of 416 patients and 150 events because a scheduled interim analysis suggested that patients treated with FU were not likely to have a better outcome than those treated with the control regimen of radiation and weekly cisplatin. Although this negative study does not represent a major advance in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer, it does highlight many of the issues and challenges faced by investigators who seek to improve cervical cancer treatment in the modern era. GOG-165 is best understood in its historical context. The trial was designed and opened in 1997. In that year, the GOG published abstracts describing encouraging preliminary results from GOG trials of cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, the inclusion of hydroxyurea in the control arms of these trials and other perceived weaknesses, including problems with the quality of radiation therapy, prevented clinicians from reaching an early consensus about the trials’ importance. Therefore, in an effort to consolidate earlier findings, GOG-165 was designed. The study initially was planned with three arms: a control arm of modern radiation therapy alone, a second arm intended to confirm the value of adding weekly cisplatin, and a third, experimental arm that consisted of treatment with radiation and protracted venous infusion FU. This third arm drew on extensive data demonstrating the value of FU-based chemoradiotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms and was intended to follow-up on an inconclusive but encouraging Canadian study of concurrent radiation and protracted venous infusion FU in patients with cervical cancer. However, in 1999, just 18 months after GOG-165 was opened, the near-simultaneous publication of results from five prospective randomized trials, all of which demonstrated significant improvements in local control and survival with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy, led to a National Cancer Institute alert establishing chemoradiotherapy as a standard treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. At that point, the GOG felt compelled to drop the radiationonly control arm of GOG-165 but continued to accrue patients to the two concurrent chemoradiotherapy arms. The results of GOG-165 suggest that radiation plus protracted venous infusion FU was not a better treatment than radiation plus weekly cisplatin, but it does not prove that FU is ineffective as a radiation sensitizer in patients with cervical cancer. More importantly, the study does not answer the potentially more interesting question of whether FU can enhance the beneficial effects of adding cisplatin to radiation therapy. In fact, although randomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of concurrent cisplatin and of concurrent cisplatin with FU, no trial has yet compared the two regimens directly. Although the GOG regimen of radiation plus weekly cisplatin tends to be favored by gynecologic oncologists in the United States, data from the seven randomized trials suggest that radiation plus a combination of cisplatin and FU might be more effective. Of four randomized trials that included radiation therapy plus weekly cisplatin, only one, reported by Keys et al in 1999, demonstrated a benefit for radiation therapy plus cisplatin over radiation therapy alone. In that study, patients with bulky stage IB cancers were randomly assigned to prehysterectomy radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy. Two other trials—the current trial and the GOG three-arm trial published in 1999—did not have a control arm of radiation therapy only; instead, they included chemotherapy of uncertain value in the noncisplatin-containing JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY E D I T O R I A L VOLUME 23 NUMBER 33 NOVEMBER 2

Phase I/II study of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib as a radiation sensitizer in patients with unresectable brain metastases

The primary goal of this phase I/II study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of celecoxib administered concomitant to radiotherapy to treat unresectable BM. Patients with measurable BM by CT or MRI, unresectability criteria by a neurosurgeon and RPA-RTOG class II were eligible. Celecoxib was administered at 400 mg/day during the entire course of radiotherapy. All patients were irradiated with 60Co beams to whole-brain dose of 32 Gy (20 fractions of 1.6 Gy each two times a day with a 6 h interval between treatments) followed by a 22.4 Gy boost (same fractionation schedule) over evident lesions. Twenty-seven patients were treated. The concurrent regimen was well tolerated with 15 cases of mild dyspepsia. Alopecia (NCI grades 1-2) was the most important side effect. Three patients presented rash/desquamation of moderate intensity. Radiological responses occurred in 18 of 25 valuable patients (72), with five complete responses (CR). Symptomatic responses were reported in 25 of 27 patients (92.6), with 20 CR. The overall response rate (considering complete plus partial responses) was 66.7. Percentile 50 for time-to-progression, time-to-neurological-progression and functional-independence-time were 3, 6.25 and 6.7 months, respectively. Median survival time was 8.7 months. Our initial results suggest that radiotherapy plus celecoxib is safe and a possible active treatment for patients with BM. Further investigation in a randomized trial is warranted to validate its clinical utility.

A Phase I dose escalation trial of motexafin gadolinium (gadolinium texaphyrin, xcytrin R)as a radiation sensitizer in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

A Phase I dose escalation trial of motexafin gadolinium (gadolinium texaphyrin, xcytrin R)as a radiation sensitizer in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme