Radiation Dose Metrics Research Articles

Performance of dual-energy subtraction in contrast-enhanced mammography for three different manufacturers: a phantom study

BackgroundDual-energy subtraction (DES) imaging is critical in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), as the recombination of low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images produces contrast enhancement while reducing anatomical noise. The study's purpose was to compare the performance of the DES algorithm among three different CEM systems using a commercial phantom.MethodsA CIRS Model 022 phantom, designed for CEM, was acquired using all available automatic exposure modes (AECs) with three CEM systems from three different manufacturers (CEM1, CEM2, and CEM3). Three studies were acquired for each system/AEC mode to measure both radiation dose and image quality metrics, including estimation of measurement error. The mean glandular dose (MGD) calculated over the three acquisitions was used as the dosimetry index, while contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was obtained from LE and HE images and DES images and used as an image quality metric.ResultsOn average, the CNR of LE images of CEM1 was 2.3 times higher than that of CEM2 and 2.7 times higher than that of CEM3. For HE images, the CNR of CEM1 was 2.7 and 3.5 times higher than that of CEM2 and CEM3, respectively. The CNR remained predominantly higher for CEM1 even when measured from DES images, followed by CEM2 and then CEM3. CEM1 delivered the lowest MGD (2.34 ± 0.03 mGy), followed by CEM3 (2.53 ± 0.02 mGy) in default AEC mode, and CEM2 (3.50 ± 0.05 mGy). The doses of CEM2 and CEM3 increased by 49.6% and 8.0% compared with CEM1, respectively.ConclusionOne system outperformed others in DES algorithms, providing higher CNR at lower doses.Relevance statementThis phantom study highlighted the variability in performance among the DES algorithms used by different CEM systems, showing that these differences can be translated in terms of variations in contrast enhancement and radiation dose.Key PointsDES images, obtained by recombining LE and HE images, have a major role in CEM.Differences in radiation dose among CEM systems were between 8.0% and 49.6%.One DES algorithm achieved superior technical performance, providing higher CNR values at a lower radiation dose.Graphical

Machine learning-based estimation of patient body weight from radiation dose metrics in computed tomography.

Currently, precise patient body weight (BW) at the time of diagnostic imaging cannot always be used for radiation dose management. Various methods have been explored to address this issue, including the application of deep learning to medical imaging and BW estimation using scan parameters. This study develops and evaluates machine learning-based BW prediction models using 11 features related to radiation dose obtained from computed tomography (CT) scans. A dataset was obtained from 3996 patients who underwent positron emission tomography CT scans, and training and test sets were established. Dose metrics and descriptive data were automatically calculated from the CT images or obtained from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine metadata. Seven machine-learning models and three simple regression models were employed to predict BW using features such as effective diameter (ED), water equivalent diameter (WED), and mean milliampere-seconds. The mean absolute error (MAE) and correlation coefficient between the estimated BW and the actual BW obtained from each BW prediction model were calculated. Our results found that the highest accuracy was obtained using a light gradient-boosting machine model, which had an MAE of 1.99kg and a strong positive correlation between estimated and actual BW (ρ=0.972). The model demonstrated significant predictive power, with 73% of patients falling within a±5% error range. WED emerged as the most relevant dose metric for BW estimation, followed by ED and sex. The proposed machine-learning approach is superior to existing methods, with high accuracy and applicability to radiation dose management. The model's reliance on universal dose metrics that are accessible through radiation dose management software enhances its practicality. In conclusion, this study presents a robust approach for BW estimation based on CT imaging that can potentially improve radiation dose management practices in clinical settings.

Expansion of Typical Values for Paediatric Patients in Ireland and Comparison with Published DRLs - Experiences of a Single Institution

IntroductionTo reduce the risks involved with ionising radiation exposure, typical values (TVs) and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) have been established to help keep radiation doses ‘as low as reasonably practicable. TVs/DRLs provide standardised radiation dose metrics that can be used for comparative purposes. However, for paediatrics, such values should consider the size of the child instead of their age. This study aimed to establish and compare paediatric TVs for chest, abdomen and pelvis radiography. MethodsStudy methods followed processes for establishing paediatric DRLs as outlined by the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). Kerma-area product (KAP) values, excluding rejected images, were retrospectively acquired from the study institution's Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). Paediatric patients were categorised into the following weight-based groupings (5 to <15 kg, 15 to <30 kg, 30 to <50 kg, 50 to 80 kg) and stratified based on the examination that was performed (chest, abdomen, and pelvis), and where it was performed (the different X-ray rooms). Anonymised data were inputted into Microsoft Excel for analysis. Median and 3rd quartile KAP values were reported together with graphical illustrations. ResultsData from 407 X-ray examinations were analysed. For the previously identified weight categories (5 to <15 kg, 15 to <30 kg, 30 to <50 kg, 50 to 80 kg), TVs for the chest were 0.10, 0.19, 0.37 and 0.53 dGy.cm2, respectively. For the abdomen 0.39, 1.04, 3.51 and 4.05 dGy.cm2 and for the pelvis 0.43, 0.87, 3.50 and 7.58 dGy.cm2. Between X-ray rooms TVs varied against the institutional TVs by -60 to 119 % (chest), -50 to 103 % (abdomen) and -14 and 24 %% (pelvis). ConclusionTVs in this study follow established trends with patient weight and examination type and are comparable with published literature. Variations do exist between individual examination rooms and reasons are multifactorial. Given that age and size do not perfectly correlate further work should be undertaken around weight-based TVs/DRLs in the paediatric setting.

Inter-reader agreement of pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability assessment with photon counting versus energy integrating detector CT.

To compare the inter-reader agreement of pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability assessment at pancreatic protocol photon-counting CT (PCCT) with conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). A retrospective single institution database search identified all contrast-enhanced pancreatic mass protocol abdominal CT performed at an outpatient facility with both a PCCT and EID-CT from 4/11/2022 to 10/30/2022. Patients without pancreatic adenocarcinoma were excluded. Four fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists, blinded to CT type, independently assessed vascular tumor involvement (uninvolved, abuts ≤ 180°, encases > 180°; celiac, superior mesenteric artery (SMA), common hepatic artery (CHA), superior mesenteric vein (SMV), main portal vein), the presence/absence of metastases, overall tumor resectability (resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced, metastatic), and diagnostic confidence. Fleiss's kappa was used to calculate inter-reader agreement. CTDIvol was recorded. Radiation dose metrics were compared with a two-sample t-test. A p < .05 indicated statistical significance. 145 patients (71 men, mean[SD] age: 66[9] years) were included. There was substantial inter-reader agreement, for celiac artery, SMA, and SMV involvement at PCCT (kappa = 0.61-0.69) versus moderate agreement at EID-CT (kappa = 0.56-0.59). CHA had substantial inter-reader agreement at both PCCT (kappa = 0.67) and EIDCT (kappa = 0.70). For metastasis identification, radiologists had substantial inter-reader agreement at PCCT (kappa = 0.78) versus moderate agreement at EID-CT (kappa = 0.56). CTDIvol for PCCT and EID-CT were 16.9[7.4]mGy and 29.8[26.6]mGy, respectively (p < .001). There was substantial inter-reader agreement for involvement of 4/5 major peripancreatic vessels (celiac artery, SMA, CHA, and SMV) at PCCT compared with 2/5 for EID-CT. PCCT also afforded substantial inter-reader agreement for metastasis detection versus moderate agreement at EID-CT with statistically significant radiation dose reduction.

An evaluation of CT radiation doses within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial.

To evaluate radiation doses for all low-dose CT scans performed during the first year of a lung screening trial. For all lung screening scans that were performed using a CT protocol that delivered image quality meeting the RSNA QIBA criteria, radiation dose metrics, participant height, weight, gender, and age were recorded. Values of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were evaluated as a function of weight in order to assess the performance of the scan protocol across the participant cohort. Calculated effective doses were used to establish the additional lifetime attributable cancer risks arising from trial scans. Median values of CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose (IQR) from the 3521 scans were 1.1mGy (0.70), 42.4mGycm (24.9), and 1.15mSv (0.67), whilst for 60-80kg participants the values were 1.0mGy (0.30), 35.8mGycm (11.4), and 0.97mSv (0.31). A statistically significant correlation between CTDIvol and weight was identified for males (r = 0.9123, P < .001) and females (r = 0.9052, P < .001), however, the effect of gender on CTDIvol was not statistically significant (P = .2328) despite notable differences existing at the extremes of the weight range. The additional lifetime attributable cancer risks from a single scan were in the range 0.001%-0.006%. Low radiation doses can be achieved across a typical lung screening cohort using scan protocols that have been shown to deliver high levels of image quality. The observed dose levels may be considered as typical values for lung screening scans on similar types of scanners for an equivalent participant cohort. Presentation of typical radiation dose levels for CT lung screening examinations in a large UK trial. Effective radiation doses can be of the order of 1mSv for standard sized participants. Lifetime attributable cancer risks resulting from a single low-dose CT scan did not exceed 0.006%.

The use of single-timepoint images to link administered radioiodine activity (MBq) to a prescribed lesion radiation-absorbed dose (cGy): a regression-based prediction interval tool for the management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer patients

PurposeTo introduce a biomarker-based dosimetry method for the rational selection of a treatment activity for patients undergoing radioactive iodine 131I therapy (RAI) for metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (mDTC) based on single-timepoint imaging of individual lesion uptake by 124I PET.MethodsPatients referred for RAI therapy of mDTC were enrolled in institutionally approved protocols. A total of 208 mDTC lesions (in 21 patients) with SUVmax > 1 underwent quantitative PET scans at 24, 48, 72, and 120 h post-administration of 222 MBq of theranostic NaI-124I to determine the individual lesion radiation-absorbed dose. Using a general estimating equation, a prediction curve for biomarker development was generated in the form of a best-fit regression line and 95% prediction interval, correlating individual predicted lesion radiation dose metrics, with candidate biomarkers (“predictors”) such as SUVmax and activity in microcurie per gram, from a single imaging timepoint.ResultsIn the 169 lesions (in 15 patients) that received 131I therapy, individual lesion cGy varied over 3 logs with a median of 22,000 cGy, confirming wide heterogeneity of lesion radiation dose. Initial findings from the prediction curve on all 208 lesions confirmed that a 48-h SUVmax was the best predictor of lesion radiation dose and permitted calculation of the 131I activity required to achieve a lesional threshold radiation dose (2000 cGy) within defined confidence intervals.ConclusionsBased on MIRD lesion-absorbed dose estimates and regression statistics, we report on the feasibility of a new single-timepoint 124I-PET-based dosimetry biomarker for RAI in patients with mDTC. The approach provides clinicians with a tool to select personalized (precision) therapeutic administration of radioactivity (MBq) to achieve a desired target lesion-absorbed dose (cGy) for selected index lesions based on a single 48-h measurement 124I-PET image, provided the selected activity does not exceed the maximum tolerated activity (MTA) of < 2 Gy to blood, as is standard of care at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.Trial registrationNCT04462471, Registered July 8, 2020.NCT03647358, Registered Aug 27, 2018.

Low-Dose Chest CT Protocols for Imaging COVID-19 Pneumonia: Technique Parameters and Radiation Dose.

Chest computed tomography (CT) plays a vital role in the early diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of COVID-19 pneumonia during the pandemic. However, this raises concerns about excessive exposure to ionizing radiation. This study aimed to survey radiation doses in low-dose chest CT (LDCT) and ultra-low-dose chest CT (ULD) protocols used for imaging COVID-19 pneumonia relative to standard CT (STD) protocols so that the best possible practice and dose reduction techniques could be recommended. A total of 564 articles were identified by searching major scientific databases, including ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. After evaluating the content and applying the inclusion criteria to technical factors and radiation dose metrics relevant to the LDCT protocols used for imaging COVID-19 patients, data from ten articles were extracted and analyzed. Technique factors that affect the application of LDCT and ULD are discussed, including tube current (mA), peak tube voltage (kVp), pitch factor, and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. The CTDIvol values for the STD, LDCT, and ULD chest CT protocols ranged from 2.79-13.2 mGy, 0.90-4.40 mGy, and 0.20-0.28 mGy, respectively. The effective dose (ED) values for STD, LDCT, and ULD chest CT protocols ranged from 1.66-6.60 mSv, 0.50-0.80 mGy, and 0.39-0.64 mSv, respectively. Compared with the standard (STD), LDCT reduced the dose reduction by a factor of 2-4, whereas ULD reduced the dose reduction by a factor of 8-13. These dose reductions were achieved by applying scan parameters and techniques such as iterative reconstructions, ultra-long pitches, and fast spectral shaping with a tin filter. Using LDCT, the cumulative radiation dose of serial CT examinations during the acute period of COVID-19 may have been inferior or equivalent to that of conventional CT.

Reduction of Radiation Dose to Eye Lens in Cerebral 3D Rotational Angiography Using Head Off-Centering by Table Height Adjustment: A Prospective Study.

Three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) is increasingly used for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms (IAs); however, radiation exposure to the lens is a concern. We investigated the effect of head off-centering by adjusting table height on the lens dose during 3D-RA and its feasibility in patient examination. The effect of head off-centering during 3D-RA on the lens radiation dose at various table heights was investigated using a RANDO head phantom (Alderson Research Labs). We prospectively enrolled 20 patients (58.0 ± 9.4 years) with IAs who were scheduled to undergo bilateral 3D-RA. In all patients' 3D-RA, the lens dose-reduction protocol involving elevation of the examination table was applied to one internal carotid artery, and the conventional protocol was applied to the other. The lens dose was measured using photoluminescent glass dosimeters (GD-352M, AGC Techno Glass Co., LTD), and radiation dose metrics were compared between the two protocols. Image quality was quantitatively analyzed using source images for image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Additionally, three reviewers qualitatively assessed the image quality using a five-point Likert scale. The phantom study showed that the lens dose was reduced by an average of 38% per 1 cm increase in table height. In the patient study, the dose-reduction protocol (elevating the table height by an average of 2.3 cm) led to an 83% reduction in the median dose from 4.65 mGy to 0.79 mGy (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between dose-reduction and conventional protocols in the kerma area product (7.34 vs. 7.40 Gy·cm², P = 0.892), air kerma (75.7 vs. 75.1 mGy, P = 0.872), and image quality. The lens radiation dose was significantly affected by table height adjustment during 3D-RA. Intentional head off-centering by elevation of the table is a simple and effective way to reduce the lens dose in clinical practice.

Physician Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy and Right Heart Catheterization

Cardiologists performing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at risk of health problems related to chronic occupational radiation exposure. Unlike during CA and PCI, physician radiation exposure during right heart catheterization (RHC) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has not been adequately studied. The objective of this study was to assess physicians' radiation doses during RHC with and without EMB and compare them to those of CA and PCI. Procedural head-level physician radiation doses were collected by real-time dosimeters. Radiation-dose metrics (fluoroscopy time, air kerma [AK] and dose area product [DAP]), and physician-level radiation doses were compared among RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI. Included in the study were 351 cardiac catheterization procedures. Of these, 36 (10.3%) were RHC, 42 (12%) RHC with EMB, 156 (44.4%) CA, and 117 (33.3%) PCI. RHC with EMB and CA had similar fluoroscopy time. AK and DAP were progressively higher for RHC, RHC with EMB, CA, and PCI. Head-level physician radiation doses were similar for RHC with EMB vs CA (P = 0.07). When physicians' radiation doses were normalized to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB had the highest doses. Physicians' head-level radiation doses during RHC with EMB were similar to those of CA. After normalizing to DAP, RHC and RHC with EMB were associated with significantly higher physician radiation doses than CA or PCI. These observations suggest that additional protective measures should be undertaken to decrease physicians' radiation exposure during RHC and, in particular, RHC with EMB.

The impact of ASiR-V on abdominal CT radiation dose and image quality – A phantom study

IntroductionTo investigate how ASiR-V and kVp changes in Computed tomography (CT) affect radiation dose and image quality, when using automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) for different sized phantoms. MethodsA liver-phantom with two different liver inserts (QRM, Moehrendorf, Germany), with extension rings, representing fat, were additionally applied to the phantom to simulate patients of different sizes (small: 30cm diameter, medium: 35cm and large: 40cm). Abdominal scans were performed on a 256 slice CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), with consistent pitch (0.992), rotation time (0.5s), slice thickness (0.625mm) and collimation (80mm), while other parameters were varied (kVp: 80/100/120/140; Noise Index: 13/22; mA interval 80-720, ASiR-V: 30/60/100%). CTDI and DLP was recorded for each scan and image quality was assessed using objective metrics in predefined anatomic areas (HU and noise). Radiation dose and image quality metrics were compared between protocols. ResultsCTDI decreased by 80% from ASIR-V 30% to ASiR-V 100% for prescribed NI 13, and by 79% for the prescribed NI of 22. For 100% ASiR-V and a prescribed NI of 22 the CTDI remained the same regardless of phantom size for the different kVp settings. Pairwise comparison revealed significant differences in CTDI (p < 0.0001) for all combinations of prescribed NI and ASIR-V levels, except the difference between ASIR-V levels of 30 and 60%, with a prescribed NI of 13 (p = 0.124).When data from the three phantom sizes were combined, increasing ASIR-V from 30-100%, resulted in noise decreases of 22% for NI of 13 and by 8% for NI of 22. Notably, image quality in the low contrast area of the liver insert was impaired when the large phantom was scanned with 100% ASiR-V and either 80/100kVp (NI 22), because of the large reduction in tube current applied (down to 80 mA). ConclusionSubstantial radiation dose reductions (up to 80%) resulted from increasing ASiR-V levels. However, image quality deteriorates when 100% ASiR-V is applied due to low applied tube current by the ATCM.

Radiation Dose Reduction in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT: Comparison of Photon-Counting Detector CT with 2nd Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT in an oncologic cohort

Comparison of radiation dose and image quality in routine abdominal and pelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) between a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and a dual energy dual source CT (DSCT). 70 oncologic patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years, 29 females) were prospectively enrolled between November 2021 and February 2022. Abdominal CECT were clinically indicated and performed first on a 2nd-generation DSCT and at follow-up on a 1st-generation dual-source PCD-CT. The same contrast media (Imeron 350, Bracco imaging) and pump protocol was used for both scans. For both scanners, polychromatic images were reconstructed with 3mm slice thickness and comparable kernel (I30f[DSCT] and Br40f[PCD-CT]); for PCD-CT data from all counted events above the lowest energy threshold at 20 keV ("T3D") were used. Results were compared in terms of radiation dose metrics of CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and size-specific dose estimation (SSDE), objective and subjective measurements of image quality were scored by two emergency radiologists including lesion conspicuity. Median time interval between the scans was 4 months (IQR: 3-6). CNRvessel and SNRvessel of T3D reconstructions from PCD-CT were significantly higher than those of DSCT (all, p < 0.05). Qualitative image noise analysis from PCD-CT and DSCT yielded a mean of 4 each. Lesion conspicuity was rated significantly higher in PCD-CT (Q3 strength) compared to DSCT images. CTDI, DLP and SSDE mean values for PCD-CT and DSCT were 7.98 ± 2.56 mGy vs. 14.11 ± 2.92 mGy, 393.13 ± 153.55 mGy*cm vs. 693.61 ± 185.76 mGy*cm and 9.98 ± 2.41 vs. 14.63 ± 1.63, respectively, translating to a dose reduction of around 32% (SSDE). PCD-CT enables oncologic abdominal CT with a significantly reduced dose while keeping image quality similar to 2nd-generation DSCT.

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography enterography with model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric Crohn\u2019s disease patients

This study assessed the image quality and diagnostic accuracy in determining disease activity of the terminal ileum of the reduced-dose computed tomography enterography using model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Eighteen patients were prospectively enrolled and allocated to the standard-dose (SD) and reduced-dose (RD) computed tomography enterography (CTE) groups (n = 9 per group). Image quality, reader confidence in interpreting bowel findings, accuracy in determining active CD in the terminal ileum, and radiation dose were evaluated. Objective image quality did not show intergroup differences, except for image sharpness. Although reader confidence in detecting mural stratification, ulcer, and perienteric fat stranding of the RD-CTE were inferior to SD-CTE, RD-CTE correctly diagnosed active disease in all patients. The mean values of radiation dose metrics (SD-CTE vs. RD-CTE) were 4.3 versus 0.74 mGy, 6.1 versus 1.1 mGy, 211.9 versus 34.5 mGy∙cm, and 4.4 versus 0.7 mSv mGy∙cm for CTDIvol, size-specific dose estimation, dose-length product, and effective dose, respectively. RD-CTE showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to SD-CTE in determining active disease of the terminal ileum in pediatric CD patients. However, image quality and reader confidence in detecting ulcer and perienteric fat stranding was compromised.

Clinical audit comparing radiation dose metrics between WEB and coil embolisation in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

IntroductionIntrasaccular flow disruption is a new and effective endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. While endovascular treatment is a minimally invasive procedure, it does carry a radiation risk. As radiation dose should be kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), the main objective of this study was to analyse KAP (kerma area product), fluoroscopy and procedure time during the treatment of aneurysms treated with coiling and the Woven-EndoBridge (WEB) device. A secondary objective was to look at the reference air kerma (RAK) to determine if the patient receives a dose that could cause tissue effects. MethodsKAP, fluoroscopy and procedure time were retrospectively analysed in patients who had an aneurysm treatment. Aneurysms with diameters of 4-11mm, over a four-year period, in the anterior and posterior circulation of the brain were analysed in this study. Patients were treated by coiling or WEB. RAK were summed together in the working projection to give an estimated entrance surface dose (ESD) in cases with the highest KAP. ResultsA total of 47 aneurysms treated with WEB and 104 aneurysms treated with coiling techniques met the inclusion criteria. The average KAP was 6884.1 ± 2774.4μGym2 with coiling techniques and 5658.7 ± 1602.5μGym2 with WEB (p=0.006; CI =363-2086μGym2). This demonstrates an 18% reduction with WEB. Mean fluoroscopy time for coiling was 63.5 ± 42.6minutes and 33.8 ± 28.8minutes for WEB (p=<0.001; CI=16–43minutes). Fluoroscopy time was reduced by nearly 50% with WEB. On average, there was a 27-minute reduction of procedure time when using WEB compared to coiling. The RAK determined for the working projections did not exceed the 2Gy threshold for tissue effects. ConclusionTreatment of aneurysms using the WEB shows a reduction in KAP, fluoroscopy, and procedure time. This study further demonstrates the benefits of intrasaccular flow disruption for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Feasibility of low-dose digital subtraction angiography protocols for the endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Among neurointerventional procedures, the embolization of complex shunt lesions usually requires more radiation dose. We aimed to evaluate the procedural outcome and safety in using low-dose DSA protocols for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (AVF) embolization treatment. Between January 2014 and July 2018, 55 patients with dural AVFs who underwent endovascular treatment were included in the study. The low-dose group (n = 27) included from January 2016 used various low-dose DSA protocols made by modifying the thickness of the copper filter or the detector entrance dose. We compared radiation dose metrics, such as air-kerma, kerma-air product (KAP), and fluoroscopy time, as well as clinical and imaging outcomes with the conventional-dose group (n = 28) included before January 2016. The total KAP was 40.1% lower in the low-dose group (87.9 vs. 146.7Gycm2, p = 0.002). The average number of DSA runs (25.1 vs. 25.5, p = 0.86) and fluoroscopy times (77.4 vs. 69.7min, p = 0.48) were similar between the groups. An immediate favorable occlusion rate (total or near total occlusion) was achieved in 41 (74.5%) patients. Ten patients (18.2%) underwent additional procedures due to residual (n = 6) and/or recurrent (n = 5) lesions. At a median of 10months follow-up, 45 patients (86.5%) had achieved favorable occlusion. Treatment outcomes showed no significant between-group differences. There was one case (1.8%) of procedure-related complications in the low-dose group. All but one patient showed favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin score ≤ 2). The low-dose protocols were feasible by showing significant radiation dose reduction and acceptable procedural outcome.

Establishing Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT Through a Provincial Medical Informatics Metadata Repository in Ontario.

To determine whether computed tomography radiation dose data could be captured electronically across hospitals to derive regional diagnostic reference levels for quality improvement. Data on consecutive computed tomography examinations from 8 hospitals were collected automatically in a central database (Repository) from April 2017 to September 2017. The most frequently performed examinations were used to determine the standard protocols for each hospital. Diagnostic reference levels across hospitals were derived using statistical distribution for 2 radiation dose metrics. These values were compared between hospitals, within and between hospitals by scanner and against national Health Canada achievable doses and diagnostic reference levels. Three master protocol groups, Head, Abdomen-Pelvis, and Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis, accounted for 43% of all valid studies (N = 40 277). For the Repository, 11 of 12 mean values and 75th percentile diagnostic reference levels were below the Health Canada mean and 75th percentile values, and one was the same as the Health Canada value. Mean radiation dose by protocol varied by as much as 97% between hospitals. There was no consistent pattern in the difference between mean doses between large and small hospitals. This electronic data acquisition process could be used to continually update achievable doses for frequently used computed tomography examinations in Ontario and eliminate the need for nationwide manual surveys. Results compared across institutions will allow hospitals to maintain achievable doses and lower patient exposure.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multicomponent Interventions for Reducing Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography

Computed tomography (CT) radiation doses vary across institutions and are often higher than needed. To assess the effectiveness of 2 interventions to reduce radiation doses in patients undergoing CT. This randomized clinical trial included 864 080 adults older than 18 years who underwent CT of the abdomen, chest, combined abdomen and chest, or head at 100 facilities in 6 countries from November 1, 2015, to September 21, 2017. Data analysis was performed from October 4, 2017, to December 14, 2018. Imaging facilities received audit feedback alone comparing radiation-dose metrics with those of other facilities followed by the multicomponent intervention, including audit feedback with targeted suggestions, a 7-week quality improvement collaborative, and best-practice sharing. Facilities were randomly allocated to the time crossing from usual care to the intervention. Primary outcomes were the proportion of high-dose CT scans and mean effective dose at the facility level. Secondary outcomes were organ doses. Outcomes after interventions were compared with those before interventions using hierarchical generalized linear models adjusting for temporal trends and patient characteristics. Across 100 facilities, 864 080 adults underwent 1 156 657 CT scans. The multicomponent intervention significantly reduced proportions of high-dose CT scans, measured using effective dose. Absolute changes in proportions of high-dose scans were 1.1% to 7.9%, with percentage reductions in the proportion of high-dose scans of 4% to 30% (abdomen: odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.88; P < .001; chest: OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99; P = .03; combined abdomen and chest: OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.59; P < .001; and head: OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.66-0.76; P < .001). Reductions in the proportions of high-dose scans were greater when measured using organ doses. The absolute reduction in the proportion of high-dose scans was 6.0% to 17.2%, reflecting 23% to 58% reductions in the proportions of high-dose scans across anatomical areas. Mean effective doses were significantly reduced after multicomponent intervention for abdomen (6% reduction, P < .001), chest (4%, P < .001), and chest and abdomen (14%, P < .001) CT scans. Larger reductions in mean organ doses were 8% to 43% across anatomical areas. Audit feedback alone reduced the proportions of high-dose scans and mean dose, but reductions in observed dose were smaller. Radiologist's satisfaction with CT image quality was unchanged and high during all periods. For imaging facilities, detailed feedback on CT radiation dose combined with actionable suggestions and quality improvement education significantly reduced doses, particularly organ doses. Effects of audit feedback alone were modest. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03000751.

Patient-based Performance Assessment for Pediatric Abdominal CT: An Automated Monitoring System Based on Lesion Detectability and Radiation Dose

To deploy an automated tool for evaluating pediatric body computed tomography (CT) performance utilizing metrics of radiation dose and image quality for the task of liver lesion detection. This IRB approved retrospective investigation used 507 IV-contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT scans of pediatric patients (<18 years) between June 2014 and November 2017 acquired on three scanner models from two manufacturers. The scans were evaluated in terms of radiation metrics (CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE) as well as task-based performance based on the clinical task of detecting a 5 mm liver lesion with a 10 HU attenuation difference from background liver. An informatics algorithm extracted a previously-validated quantitative detectability index (d') from each case reflective of the likelihood of detecting a liver lesion. The results were analyzed in terms of the relationship between d' and radiation dose metrics. There was minimal SSDE variability by age. Median SSDE at 100 kV on one scanner model was 5.2 mGy (5.0-5.4 mGy interquartile range). However, when assessing image quality by applying d', the age groups separated such that the younger patients had higher d' values than older patients. Similar trends were seen in all scanners. An automated method to assess clinical image quality for pediatric CT provided a metric of image quality that varied as expected across ages (i.e., higher quality for younger patients). This tool affords the establishment of a quality reference level that, in addition to dose estimations currently available, would allow for enhanced assessment (e.g., facilitated audit) of CT imaging performance.

Dosimetric Feasibility of Cone-Beam CT in Pediatric Image-Guided Retrograde Gastrostomy Tube Insertions.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in interventional radiology allows volumetric imaging with open patient access. This work aimed to assess radiation dose metrics of CBCT in simulated image-guided retrograde gastrostomy (IGRG) tube insertions in pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms and to compare them to measured radiation dose metrics obtained using fluoroscopy during clinical IGRG tube insertions in children. Radiation dose indices obtained from radiation dose structured reports of fluoroscopic IGRG tube insertions were retrospectively evaluated in a consecutive cohort of 30 children. Dose indices were fractionated into 3 clinical stages for each procedure (planning, insertion, and confirmation). These 3 stages in 30 patients (3 × 30 = 90 patient stages) were compared to dose indices measured from 4 CBCT acquisition protocols acquired in pediatric phantoms. The mean proportion of radiation dose during planning, insertion, and confirmation was 35%, 38% and 27%, with mean reference-point air kerma (range) measured to be 1.0 (0.02-6.0) mGy, 0.9 (0.03-4.1) mGy, and 0.7 (0.04-3.7) mGy, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography dose varied greatly depending on technical parameters and protocol selection, ranging from 0.7 to 39.3 mGy. In 19% of patient stages, the most dose-sparing CBCT protocol evaluated on phantoms delivered less radiation than the radiation dose indices recorded from patient's fluoroscopy. From a dosimetric perspective, radiation delivered in CBCT can vary widely, yet can be appreciably low. With appropriate CBCT protocol selection, the radiation dose delivered may be sufficiently low to warrant consideration for use, if clinically needed during difficult IGRG tube insertions, and satisfy the interventionalist's benefit-risk assessment.

Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a 17-year single-center retrospective MDCT pulmonary angiography study

ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and alternative diagnoses detected by computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in pregnant women; and to assess changes over time regarding radiation dose, technical quality, and examination frequency.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included all pregnant women referred for CTPA due to clinically suspected PE over 17 years. Two blinded radiologists reviewed the CTPAs in consensus with regard to PE, alternative diagnoses, and technical quality. We retrieved patient data regarding radiation dose metrics and associated clinical and laboratory parameters. Subgroup comparisons were performed (Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests).ResultsOf the 237 identified patients, 8 (3.3%) were excluded due to inadequate technical CTPA quality, and 229 patients were analyzed (mean age, 31.7 years; mean gestational age, 28 ± 7 weeks). The four different CT systems used over the study period had similar technical quality (p = 0.28). Of 229 patients 16 (7%) patients had PE, 144 (62.9%) had no abnormal findings, and 69 (30.1%) had an alternative diagnosis (consolidation, other pulmonary opacities, pleural effusion, and basal atelectasis). Gestational age, symptoms, and D-dimer levels were not significantly different between patients with or without PE (p > 0.05). Over time, radiation dose exposure decreased by 30% (p < 0.001), while the number of annual examinations increased by > 4-folds.ConclusionsIn pregnant women, CTPA rarely indicates PE and more often shows alternative diagnoses. Over 17 years, the use of CTPA in pregnancy has notably increased, while the radiation dose exposure has decreased by one third.Key Points• The use of CTPA in pregnancy has steadily risen over the last 17 years• In pregnant women, CTPA rarely reveals PE and more often shows alternative diagnoses• Recent technical improvements have substantially decreased the radiation dose exposure inherent in CTPA without reducing diagnostic image quality

Dual-energy CT for routine imaging of the abdomen and pelvis: radiation dose and image quality.

To assess the radiation dose and image quality of routine dual energy CT (DECT) of the abdomen and pelvis performed in the emergency department setting, compared with single energy CT (SECT). Seventy-five consecutive routine contrast-enhanced SECT scans of the abdomen and pelvis meeting inclusion criteria were compared with 75 routine contrast-enhanced DECT scans matched by size and patient weight (within 10 lbs), performed on the same dual-source DECT scanner. Cohorts were compared in terms of radiation dose metrics of CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP), objective measurements of image quality (signal, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio of a variety of anatomical landmarks), and subjective measurements of image quality scored by two emergency radiologists. Demographics and patient size were not statistically different between DECT and SECT cohorts. Both average scans CTDIvol and DLP were significantly lower with DECT than with SECT. Average scan CTDIvol for SECT was 14.7 mGy (± 6.6) and for DECT was 10.9 mGy (± 3.8) (p < 0.0001). Average scan DLP for SECT was 681.5 mGy cm (± 339.3) and for DECT was 534.8 mGy cm (± 201.9) (p < 0.0001). For objective image quality metrics, for all structures measured, noise was significantly lower and SNR was significantly higher with DECT compared with SECT. For subjective image quality, for both readers, there was no significant difference between SECT and DECT in subjective image quality for soft tissues and vascular structures, or for subjective image noise. DECT was performed with decreased radiation dose when compared with SECT, demonstrated improved objective measurements of image quality, and equivalent subjective image quality.