Radial Artery Access Research Articles

A Personal Commentary Regarding Radial and Femoral Arterial Access

A Personal Commentary Regarding Radial and Femoral Arterial Access

Radial artery haemostasis after coronary angiography: A scoping review.

Nursing care in interventional cardiology is vital during perioperative stages, especially with coronary angiography. Radial artery access is now preferred, requiring proper haemostasis to prevent complications. Standardised protocols are needed for effective and economical haemostasis methods. This review aims to map the literature on haemostasis of the radial artery after coronary angiography, an area not previously reviewed. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, two reviewers independently selected studies based on eligibility criteria. Data were extracted using a specially developed tool, with disagreements resolved through discussion or a third reviewer. Data synthesis is presented in tabular form and narrative summary. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews guidelines were followed. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Opengrey, DART-Europe e-theses portal and six key interventional cardiology reference sites. From 43 manuscripts, four haemostasis methods for the radial artery after coronary angiography were identified: manual compression (n = 5), compression bandages (n = 16), compression devices (n = 30) and haemostatic patches (n = 7). Nearly 70% (n = 30) of references focused on compression devices. Nine techniques were used to evaluate haemostasis methods, with visual inspection (34 references) and Doppler ultrasound (17 references) being the most common. Only nine haemostasis methods lacked an associated protocol. This scoping review identifies four primary haemostasis methods post coronary angiography: manual compression, compression bandages, compression devices and haemostatic patches, with compression devices being the most frequently discussed. The variability in evaluation techniques, predominantly visual inspection and ultrasound, underscores the need for standardised guidelines. The absence of protocols for some methods further highlights the necessity for uniform standards to improve consistency and reliability in clinical practice. Standardising these methods and protocols is essential to enhance patient outcomes and advance the field.

Abstract 4118076: Right Innominate Artery Endovascular Intervention Via Single Radial Access and Use Of Embolic Protection

Introduction: The occurrence of innominate artery stenosis is less prevalent compared to subclavian artery disease. Small studies suggest up to 8% of individuals initially diagnosed with suspected subclavian steal syndrome may present with innominate artery lesions. Deployment of an embolic protection filter within the internal carotid artery during percutaneous intervention of the innominate artery presents a solution to mitigate embolism. Case: A 70-year-old female with a history of peripheral vascular disease presented with claudication in both arms, manifested as pain in both arms. Her left subclavian was stented months prior to presentation. An aortogram revealed severe stenosis of the innominate artery (Figure 1). Since multiple attempts to cross the lesion antegrade from the femoral access site were unsuccessful, we proceeded with the successful deployment of an embolic protection filter in the right internal carotid artery via our right radial artery access site (Figure 2). Using the right radial artery, we passed a long run-through guidewire into the distal abdominal aorta. Due to severe aortic tortuosity, we were unable to snare the wire from the aorta. Therefore, we upsized the radial sheath to 7 French over both wires (runthrough and bare). Using a support catheter, we exchanged the runthrough wire for a Glidewire Advantage. We advanced an 8 x 29mm balloon expandable stent to the area of innominate stenosis and deployed it (Figure 3). We postdilated the stent with a 14mm balloon. Angiography demonstrated adequate expansion. On follow up, the patient was without claudication and had triphasic flow in the innominate and left subclavian arteries. Discussion: Treating innominate artery stenosis via radial access employing a sole entry point for both embolic protection and treatment administration offers a substitute where additional access is infeasible. Modern embolic protection techniques are superior due to their flexibility and ease of use. In this case, placing the embolic protection device in the carotid artery was mandatory through the sole radial access to prevent trapping the filter behind the innominate artery stent. We were able to perform both the embolic device placement and the stenting with the same radial access. Conclusion: Endovascular intervention of innominate artery stenosis via radial access, utilizing a single radial access for both embolic protection and treatment delivery, presents an alternative when femoral access is not feasible.

Temporal trends in major bleeding after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from 2003 to 2017: the Western Denmark Heart Registry

Abstract Background Management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has changed during the last two decades. Introduction of more potent platelet inhibitors may carry an increased risk of bleeding complications, while other therapeutic options, such as use of radial artery access and proton pump inhibitors may reduce bleeding risk. The combined impact of these treatment changes on bleeding risk in patients with STEMI remains unknown. Purpose To examine temporal trends in 1-year risk of major bleeding after STEMI treated with primary PCI from 2003 to 2017. Methods We used the Western Denmark Heart Registry to identify first-time PCI-treated patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI from 2003 to 2017. Patients were divided into 4 calendar periods based on the time of STEMI. The main outcome was 1-year risk of major bleeding defined as a hospital admission for bleeding using a validated definition with high accuracy. Additionally, the 1-year risk of major bleeding in STEMI patients was compared with the risk in an age- and sex-matched general population cohort without prior coronary artery disease. Results From 2003 to 2017, we identified 18,540 patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI (median age 64 years, 75% men)and 92,700 age- and sex-matched individuals. The 1-year risk of major bleeding after STEMI was similar across the different time periods; 4.1% in 2003-2006, 3.8% in 2007-2010, 3.8% in 2011-2014, and 4.5% in 2015-2017. The adjusted HR for bleeding in STEMI patients was 1.03 (95% CI 0.83-1.26) when comparing the latest period with the earliest period. The age- and sex-matched general population exhibited a 1-year risk of major bleeding of around 1% in all time periods (Figure 1). Conclusions Despite changes in management, the 1-year risk of major bleeding remained stable around 4% after primary PCI-treated STEMI from 2003 to 2017. This risk was approximately 4 times higher than the bleeding risk observed in an age- and sex-matched general population.

Decreased Incidence of Radial Artery Vasospasm Using a Distal Transradial Approach in Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Comparison of 200 Consecutive Cases.

Radial artery vasospasm is a common complication of radial artery catheterization. During the implementation of distal transradial approach (dTRA), we observed a decreased incidence of radial artery vasospasm on radial artery angiography following access that was not well detailed in the literature. The purpose of this study was to characterize the phenomenon of radial artery vasospasm in the context of different radial artery access points for diagnostic cerebral angiography. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography from September 2023 to March 2024. Hundred conventional transradial approach (cTRA) and 100 dTRA diagnostic cerebral angiograms were performed. Following sheath insertion, all angiographic runs were reviewed, and a classification scheme was used to detail radial artery vasospasm occurrence. Radial artery vasospasm was lower in the dTRA approach compared with the cTRA approach (P = .019). A change in radial artery diameter was noted in 47 (47%) patients in the cTRA group vs 28 (28%) patients in the dTRA group. Radial artery diameter distal to the sheath was smaller in the cTRA group (2.30 ± 0.41) compared with the dTRA group (2.42 ± 0.48) (P = .021). Patients with Grade II/III spasm were younger (58 years vs 62 years; P = .029) and had a higher percentage of females (77.3% vs 62.4%; P = .030). Grade II/III spasm patients had a higher percentage of the cTRA approach compared with the dTRA approach (62.7% vs 42.4%; P = .008). These procedures were significantly longer with Grade II/III procedure time of 18:00 minutes vs 15.59 minutes in the Grade I group. Number of vessels catheterized was not significantly different between groups (P = .262). dTRA for diagnostic cerebral angiography is associated with a lower incidence of radial artery vasospasm compared with cTRA. Operators seeking to obviate radial artery vasospasm may consider using the dTRA approach for diagnostic cerebral angiography.

TCT-996 A Comparative Study of Dorsal Radial Artery Access vs Classical Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography

TCT-996 A Comparative Study of Dorsal Radial Artery Access vs Classical Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography

TCT-995 Comparison of Left Radial vs Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

TCT-995 Comparison of Left Radial vs Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

TCT-1001 Distal Radial Artery Access for Recanalization of Radial Artery Occlusion in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Two-Year Follow-Up

TCT-1001 Distal Radial Artery Access for Recanalization of Radial Artery Occlusion in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Two-Year Follow-Up

ASSOCIATION OF RADIAL ARTERY ACCESS WITH REDUCED INCIDENCE OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication following cardiac procedures, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The choice of vascular access site may influence the incidence of AKI, with radial artery access potentially offering protective benefits compared to femoral artery access. Objective: To evaluate the association between radial artery access during cardiac procedures and the incidence of acute kidney injury among patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease from January 2023 to January 2024. A total of 370 patients who underwent cardiac procedures were included, comprising 200 patients in the radial artery access group and 170 in the femoral artery access group. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records, including demographic information, baseline renal function, procedural details, and serum creatinine levels before and after the procedure. The incidence of AKI was determined based on established criteria for changes in serum creatinine. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: Patients in the radial artery access group had a shorter average hospital stay (2.5 ± 1.2 days) compared to the femoral group (3.8 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.001). The mortality rate was lower in the radial group (1.5%) versus the femoral group (4.1%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was 2.5% in the radial group compared to 5.9% in the femoral group (p = 0.07). Acute kidney injury occurred in 10.0% of patients in the radial artery access group (20 out of 200) versus 17.6% in the femoral artery access group (30 out of 170), indicating a significant reduction in AKI incidence with radial access. Conclusion: Using radial artery access during cardiac procedures significantly reduces the incidence of acute kidney injury compared to femoral artery access. These findings support the preference for radial artery access to minimize the risk of AKI and improve patient outcomes.

Sex differences in transradial access failure in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Transradial access (TRA) is now the default access site for PPCI, but technically is a more challenging approach mostly due to anatomic challenges connected to the RA. To assess the differences according to sex in radial artery (RA) access site characteristics during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). All 5092 consecutive STEMI patients from our center in the period from March 2011 until December 2017 were examined. The right proximal radial was the "intention-to-treat" access in all patients. Preprocedural RA angiography was performed in all patients. Clinical and procedure characteristics, type of radial anatomy variants, need to use another arterial access sites (the primary endpoint for this study), and procedure time were analyzed by sex. Using logistic regression, we selected predictors of radial crossover. Access site bleeding complications and vascular complications were also recorded. The STEMI population in this period included 1326 females and 3766 male patients. Females were older (65 ± 11 years) than males (59 ± 11 years, p < 0.0001). Among standard risk factors, hypertension and diabetes mellitus were more common in women and smoking less common. RA anomalies were more frequent in the females (8.8% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.0001), with complex RA loop and tortuous RA twice as frequent in women. Failure of TRA access as the initially chosen site occurred in 4.6% (61) of females versus 2.5% (97) of male STEMI patients (p = 0.0003). The most common subsequent access site was right ulnar access in both groups (57 and 61% respectively). Access site bleeding complications were more common in women 4.4% versus 3.2%, mirrored in hematomas with EASY score III to V. Clinical RA spasm (RAS) was significantly more frequent in females (5.7% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis identified 5 independent predictors for TRA access crossover: previous TRA, anomalous RA, RAS, along with female sex and diabetes. Female sex is a significant predictor of more complex TRA in STEMI. Understanding sex differences and predictors for TRA crossover will strengthen the use of different procedural modalities that can help in preserving a successful wrist access in female STEMI patients.

Radial artery access with a sheathless 0.087” inner diameter balloon guide catheter (Walrus) for neurointerventional procedures: Technique and clinical outcomes

Radial artery access with a sheathless 0.087” inner diameter balloon guide catheter (Walrus) for neurointerventional procedures: Technique and clinical outcomes

Feasibility and safety of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver cancer via the distal radial approach: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

The femoral artery is the standard route for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); however, it is negatively associated with the quality of life of patients, and carries an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs. We employed the distal radial approach to TACE to assess its feasibility and safety. We conducted a retrospective study at the First Hospital of Jilin University from August 1, 2020 to October 31, 2023. To be eligible for inclusion in the study, the patients had to meet the following main inclusion criteria: (I) have undergone a preoperative imaging (abdominal computed tomography enhancement or magnetic resonance dynamic enhancement) examination, or have a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of primary liver cancer, and a Child-Pugh score of A or B; and (II) have undergone distal radial artery puncture. The primary endpoint of this study was the success rate of distal radial artery puncture. The secondary endpoints were complications and the duration of the puncture. Among the 343 patients with primary liver cancer (of whom 236 were male and 107 were female), a total of 1,315 distal radial artery punctures were attempted. The success rate was remarkably high at 95.13% (1,251/1,315), with only 64 cases requiring an alternative approach due to failed puncture. The average puncture duration was 20±7.43 minutes. No bleeding and hematoma, no arterial dissection and pseudoaneurysm formation were observed on ultrasound, and the radial pulse was palpable in all patients, highlighting the safety of the procedure. Further, no adverse events of vascular occlusion were observed among the 12 patients who received 6 or more punctures, indicating the sustainability of the distal radial artery access under the premise of adequate vascular protection. The development of this technique requires a learning curve of at least 50 cases to break through the learning baseline and be proficient in distal radial artery blind puncture. This may be the reason why many interventional physicians are reluctant to perform this procedure, adapting to the femoral approach with a shorter learning curve. The distal radial artery approach is feasible and safe in hepatic arterial chemoembolization, and should be widely promoted in TACE.

Ultrasound-guided modified dynamic needle tip positioning technique for distal radial artery catheterization: A randomized controlled trial.

The distal radial artery presents a particular challenge for puncture and catheterization due to its diminutive size, tortuous path, and tendency to spasm, increasing the risk of procedural failure and injury. Ultrasound guidance improves success rates and reduces risk in radial artery catheterization. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a refined dynamic needle tip positioning technique for distal radial artery access. One hundred twelve patients were randomized to either the modified dynamic needle tip positioning technique (MDNTP) or palpation guidance groups (palpation group), each with 56 participants. The primary outcomes were the success rate of the initial puncture and overall puncture success rate, while secondary outcomes included procedural time and complications such as puncture site hematoma and radial artery occlusion within 24 h. The MDNTP group exhibited superior initial puncture success (71.43% vs 46.43%, p < 0.05) and fewer puncture attempts (median 1 (1, 2) vs 2 (1, 4), p < 0.05), resulting in a higher overall puncture success rate (98.21% vs 87.50%, p = 0.028). Notably, sheath insertion times were significantly shorter (17 (12, 21) s vs 57 (32, 100) s, p = 0.001) and the Sheath insertion success rate was higher (96.43% vs 82.14%, p = 0.015) in the MDNTP group. Furthermore, the incidence of puncture site hematomas was reduced (5.36% vs 19.64%, p = 0.022), although puncture time was longer (60 (28, 116) s vs 40 (15, 79) s, p = 0.033). Despite these differences, total procedural time and the incidence of radial artery occlusion at 24 h postoperatively were comparable between the two groups. The MDNTP technique boosts the success of distal radial artery puncture and catheterization, reducing the risk of complications associated with the procedure.

Serial dilation to enable ulnar artery access for endovascular neurointervention: Technical report and systematic review of the literature

BackgroundFor rare neuro-endovascular cases in which transfemoral access is not feasible and the palmar circulation is insufficient for radial artery access, ulnar artery access may be considered. Materials and methodsMechanical thrombectomy via ulnar artery access was performed to preserve the dominant radial artery. The ulnar artery was serial dilated to 7-French with microdilator. Angiography was performed using a diagnostic catheter. The sheath was exchanged for a guide catheter, and a triaxial system was inserted. A mechanical thrombectomy was performed. The systematic literature review included all studies pertaining to techniques for ulnar artery access for neurointervention in the last 20 years (2003–2023) published in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Results67-year-old male developed left MCA syndrome in the setting of an infected abdominal aortic endograft. A transfemoral approach was ruled out due to concern for crossing the infected endograft. Allen test and ultrasound demonstrated that the right radial artery was of adequate size for access, but the ulnar artery was insufficient to support the palmar arch. Mechanical thrombectomy resulted in TICI 3 reperfusion. Systematic review of the literature yielded 2 case series and 1 case report of transulnar neurovascular procedures. Access site complications were rare and included 3 access site hematomas and 1 ulnar artery occlusion. ConclusionWe report our technique of serial dilation of the ulnar artery for neuroendovascular procedures and provide a systematic review of the literature for complication avoidance in ulnar artery access.

Procedural Outcomes With Femoral, Radial, Distal Radial, and Ulnar Access for Coronary Angiography: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Radial artery access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the risk of death, bleeding, and vascular complications and is preferred over femoral artery access, leading to a class 1 indication by clinical practice guidelines. However, alternate upper extremity access such as distal radial and ulnar access are not mentioned in the guidelines despite randomized trials. We aimed to evaluate procedural outcomes with femoral, radial, distal radial, and ulnar access sites in patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI. PubMed, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared at least 2 of the 4 access sites in patients undergoing PCI or angiography. Primary outcomes were major bleeding and access site hematoma. Intention-to-treat mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis was performed. From 47 randomized clinical trials that randomized 38 924 patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI, when compared with femoral access, there was a lower risk of major bleeding with radial access (odds ratio [OR], 0.46 [95% CI, 0.35-0.59]) and lower risk of access site hematoma with radial (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.24-0.48]), distal radial (OR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.20-0.56]), and ulnar (OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.31-0.83]) access. However, when compared with radial access, there was higher risk of hematoma with ulnar access (OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.03-2.14]). Data from randomized trials support guideline recommendation of class 1 for the preference of radial access over femoral access in patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI. Moreover, distal radial and ulnar access can be considered as a default secondary access site before considering femoral access. URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: 42024512365.

Adverse Events in Open Surgical vs. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Brachial Access for Endovascular Interventions.

Background: Advances in endovascular interventions have made endovascular approaches the first option for treating peripheral arterial diseases. Although radial artery access is commonly used for coronary procedures, the common femoral artery remains the most frequent site for endovascular treatments due to better ergonomics and proven technical success. Meanwhile, data on using upper extremity access via the brachial artery during complex endovascular aortic interventions are lacking. This study aimed to compare the incidence of access site complications between ultrasound-guided percutaneous brachial access (UPA) and open surgical incisional brachial access (OSA) in the management of peripheral arterial diseases. Methods: Patients who underwent treatment for peripheral arterial and aortic disease using brachial access from 2019 to 2023 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the complication rate at the access site 30 days postoperatively. Access-related complications included bleeding requiring re-exploration, acute upper limb ischemia, thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and nerve injury associated with the brachial access. Results: Brachial access was performed on 485 patients (UPA, n = 320; OSA, n = 165). The mean operation time was 164.5 ± 45.4 min for the percutaneous procedure and 289.2 ± 79.4 min for the cutdown procedure (p = 0.003). Postprocedural hematoma occurred in 15 patients in the UPA group and 2 patients in the OSA group (p = 0.004). Thromboembolic events were observed in 9 patients in the percutaneous group and 3 patients in the OSA group. Reoperation was required for 23 patients in the percutaneous group and 8 patients in the cutdown group. Conclusions: The findings indicate that patients undergoing endovascular arterial interventions have a higher rate of brachial access complications in the UPA group compared to the OSA group.

Radial artery catheterization using a novel T-type ultrasound probe: a single-center randomized study.

Ultrasound guidance has been reported to facilitate radial artery catheterization compared with the palpation method. However, a recent meta-analysis showed that there was not significant differences in the first attempt success rate between the long-axis in-plane (LA-IP) method and the short-axis out-of-plane method. In 2023, we started using a novel T-type probe. We can recognize the needle first during the radial artery access with the short-axis view and then dose it with the long-axis view using the T-type probe. Therefore, we hypothesized that the T-type probe-guided method might heighten the first attempt success rate in radial artery catheterization, even for non-expert practitioners, compared with the LA-IP technique. One hundred and fifty adult patients, older than 20years, ASA I to III, were randomly assigned to the T-type probe-guided group (Group T: n = 75) or the LA-IP group (Group L: n = 75). The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate. The first attempt success rate in Group T (49/71, 69%) was significantly higher than that in Group L (31/68, 46%) (p = 0.0062). The present study showed that the T-type probe might facilitate the radial artery catheterization rather than the LA-IP method.

Safety of an Early Discharge Strategy (≤48 h) after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Early discharge following ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) confers notable advantages for both patients and healthcare systems. However, the adoption of a very early discharge strategy for selected patients remains limited due to safety considerations. We aimed to provide some insight into the safety of a discharge program with a hospital stay lasting <48 h after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Using a registry of 1105 patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI in our hospital between January 2015 and October 2023, we enrolled all the patients who had a hospital stay ≤48 h, according to a prespecified institutional protocol. The primary objective was a combined rate of non-fatal stroke, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death within 30 days of discharge. Emergency department visits or hospitalizations due to cardiovascular causes, along with the all-cause mortality, were measured during the same period. Results: A total of 453 (41%) patients were discharged ≤48 h after admission for a STEMI. The mean age was 62.4 (±12.5 years), 24.3% were women, and 17.9% were people with diabetes. Up to 96% of the procedures had been performed through radial artery access, and there were no major vascular complications. Regarding the primary endpoint, there was one event (0.2%; one patient suffered a non-fatal myocardial infarction). There were no cardiovascular deaths or deaths from other causes. Only five patients (1.1%) were re-hospitalized or visited the emergency department due to cardiovascular causes. Conclusions: An early discharge strategy for patients within 48 h of experiencing STEMI and undergoing primary PCI appears feasible and safe.

Safety and Efficacy of Radial Artery Access for Peripheral Vascular Intervention: A Single-Center Experience

Radial artery (RA) access has been increasingly utilized for coronary procedures due to lower rates of access-site complications and improved patient satisfaction. However, limited data are available for RA access for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We performed a retrospective review of 143 patients who underwent PVI via RA access from February 2020 to September 2022 at a single institution. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were ascertained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Of 491 PVI, 156 (31.8%) were performed through the RA. Anatomical location for intervention were the femoral (44.8%), iliac (31.1%), popliteal (9.6%) peroneal (2.7%), tibial (9.9%), and subclavian (1.9%) arteries. Procedural access was obtained through the right RA (92.9%), left RA (4.5%), or right ulnar artery (2.6%) using the 6 French R2P Destination Slender sheath in 85 cm, 105 cm, and 119 cm lengths. Atherectomy was used in 34.7%. Mean contrast volume was 105.5 mL and the average fluoroscopy time was 18.5 minutes. Conversion to femoral access occurred in 3 cases (1.9%) due to arterial spasm and non-crossable lesions. Concomitant pedal access occurred in 2 cases (1.3%). Periprocedural complication rate was 3.84%, of which access-site hematoma was most common (3.2%); none required blood transfusion, surgical intervention, or additional hospital stay. There was 1 case (0.64%) of in-hospital stroke. The mortality rate at 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year was 1.4%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. In conclusion, RA access is feasible for diverse PVI, and future studies are needed to assess safety and benefit compared to femoral artery access.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the Axiostat® dressing device to achieve radial artery access hemostasis: The R3A study.

Radial access is the default approach in interventional cardiology. The Axiostat® surgical hemostatic dressing, using chitosan as its active component, has demonstrated potential in accelerating blood clotting. This study aims to assess the efficacy and the safety of the Axiostat® dressing in achieving hemostasis in patients undergoing transradial coronary angioplasty (TRCA). This prospective, single-center observational study, conducted in 2022, enrolled consecutive patients undergoing TRCA, with a target of 150 participants. The primary outcome was the success rate of radial artery hemostasis at 120 min, without bleeding necessitating immediate re-compression. The secondary outcome included Axiostat® performance at 24 h and 30 days Postprocedure. The study was terminated prematurely for ethical and patient safety reasons, after inclusion of 41 consecutive TRCA patients due to an unexpectedly high radial artery thrombosis rate (19.5%, n = 8/41) observed 24 h Postprocedure. The success rate of radial hemostasis with the Axiostat® dressing was 78.0%. Procedural details and patient characteristics were comparable between successful Axiostat® removal and device failure cases. The use of the Axiostat® dressing to achieve hemostasis after TRCA is effective but is associated with an unexpectedly high incidence of radial thrombosis. Our results should encourage caution in the future evaluation and use of this device for radial artery compression following TRCA.