Abstract This article focusses on the Great Replacement as that narrative of the New Right that currently constitutes the centerpiece of many inter-related and implicitly or explicitly racist discourses about migrants and refugees. As a discourse, the narrative of a Great Replacement encapsulates and reflects the desire for an „ethnocultural identity“ that is antagonistically realized it in such a way that uncountable others are declared to be (non-identical) „foreign bodies“, so that their violent removal appears justified. The main aim of this article is to assess and criticize the rhetorical and stylistic strategies of the New Right, which repeatedly refer to aspects of an alleged naturalness (the „ethno-plural nature“ of Europe) while attempting to conceal how artificial their argumentation is. In contrast to a dissimulazione onesta, as formulated as a concept by Torquato Accetto, in the case of the Great Replacement one could thus speak of a dissimulazione dis-onesta, i. e. of a constitutive dishonesty or strategic deception.
Read full abstract