Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact Of Disease Research Articles

Remote patient-reported outcome measure triage score for monitoring disease activity and allocation of consultations in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Objective Currently, expedited by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there is high demand for allocating patients in a state of low disease activity to telehealth, ideally based on remote measurements. This cross-sectional study assesses the discriminative accuracy of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) questionnaire regarding high and low disease activity. Furthermore, we aimed to optimize this classification, developing a remote triage score based on RAID and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Method Data were acquired from an outpatient clinic cohort of chronic rheumatoid arthritis patients at a large trainee hospital in the Netherlands. Patients were divided into high and low disease categories, based on 28-joint Disease Activity Score–C-reactive protein. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression were performed, including RAID item scores and other PROMs. Receiver operating characteristics curves and areas under the curve (AUCs) were obtained, and cut-off scores were based on predefined criteria of 90% and 95% sensitivity. Results In total, 278 patients were analysed, of whom 77.2% were identified as having low disease activity. RAID results correlated with DAS28-CRP, showing good performance. The regression model included the RAID items pain and functional disability assessment, and the self-reported swollen joint count (SR-SJC). With an AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.84–0.92), this model performed better than the RAID total score. Conclusion A remote triage score based on a composite score of pain, functional disability assessment, and SR-SJC can detect a sufficient proportion of patients with low disease activity who can be allocated to remote consultations.

Treat-to-target fixed dose rituximab retreatment versus fixed interval retreatment with disease activity-guided rituximab dose optimisation for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial focusing on long-term disease impact (RITUXERA)

BackgroundThe optimal retreatment strategy with rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a point of discussion. Depending on local guidelines, rituximab can either be administered at fixed intervals or when losing disease control, balancing therapeutic effectiveness with drug overexposure. However, treatment based on loss of disease control may significantly affect patients’ lives, provoking uncertainty and potentially leading to progressive joint damage. Moreover, as low-dose rituximab proved to be effective in treating RA while decreasing toxicity, drug exposure may be limited by tapering down rituximab doses guided by disease activity.MethodsRITUXERA is a 104-week open-label multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial. In total, 134 patients with RA treated with rituximab will be 1:1 randomised when in need of retreatment (DAS28-CRP ≥ 3.2 with previous rituximab administration at least 24 weeks earlier) to either a treat-to-target-driven fixed dose retreatment strategy (usual care group) or fixed interval disease-activity guided dose optimisation strategy (experimental group). The usual care group will be retreated with fixed rituximab doses (1 × 1000 mg IV) in case of loss of disease control (DAS28-CRP ≥ 3.2). The experimental group will receive a 24-weekly rituximab treatment while tapering down the dose in a decreasing sequence if DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2: 1 × 1000 mg IV (maximal dose), 1 × 500 mg IV, and 1 × 200 mg IV (minimal dose). If DAS28-CRP exceeds 3.2 at the six-monthly retreatment, patients will receive and remain on the previous effective dose. Study visits are planned every 12 weeks. Primary outcome is the comparison of longitudinal patient-reported disease impact over 104 weeks, measured with the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) instrument, analysed using a linear mixed model. Main secondary outcome is the comparison of longitudinal disease activity (DAS28-CRP) over 104 weeks.DiscussionThe RITUXERA trial aims to explore the optimal retreatment strategy with rituximab for RA in terms of long-term patient-reported disease impact, by proposing a fixed interval disease activity-guided dose optimisation strategy as compared to a treat-to-target fixed dose strategy.Trial registrationCTIS 2023–506638-59–01 (registration date: 07 September 2023), ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06003283 (registration date: 17 August 2023).

Evaluation of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) Score in Assessing Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity in Teleconsultation.

To evaluate the relevance of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score as a disease activity marker of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a teleconsultation setting. A prospective, observational, 24-month, single-center study involving patients with RA who underwent teleconsultations was performed. The RAID score was sent to all patients by email and completed the day before the scheduled session. The RAID questionnaire was also completed just prior to the next scheduled face-to-face consultation. The same physician performed teleconsultation/in-person consultations and was unaware of the RAID results. We included 70 patients (mean age 50 [SD 14] yrs, mean disease duration 10 [SD 9] yrs). The RAID score correlated with the following items: patient global assessment (r 0.55, P < 0.001), patient-reported swollen joint count (r 0.50, P < 0.001), and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) calculated with patient self-reported tender/swollen joints (r 0.74, P < 0.001). The RAID score completed during the next face-to-face consultation for 45 patients also correlated with the DAS28-CRP performed by the clinician (r 0.65, P < 0.001). A RAID score > 2 was associated with the best combination of sensitivity (94%) and specificity (43%) for the indication of rapid in-person consultation because of insufficiently controlled disease activity, with an area under the curve of 0.74. All 23 patients with RAID < 2 had no intercurrent flares; overall physician global assessment was 1.6 of 10 (SD 1.4), DAS28-CRP 1.5 (SD 0.2), and CRP 1.8 (SD 1.4) mg/L. Our findings reinforce the RAID score as a valuable tool in teleconsultation, exhibiting a good correlation with disease activity variables. Using a RAID score threshold of 2 during teleconsultations could distinguish patients with good disease control and those with the potential need for an in-person visit.

Performance of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score in relation to flares in disease activity

ObjectivesTo explore the performance of the EULAR-initiated patient-reported Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) questionnaire in relation to flares in disease activity, including comparison with other disease activity outcomes.MethodsPatients with...

Capturing Patient Value in an Economic Evaluation.

Economic evaluations predominantly use generic outcomes, such as the Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), to assess health status. However, because of the generic nature, they are less suitable to capture the quality of life of patients with specific conditions. Given the transition to patient-centered (remote) care delivery, this study aims to evaluate the possibility of using disease-specific measures in a cost-effectiveness analysis. A real-life cohort from Maasstad Hospital (2020-2021) in the Netherlands, with 772 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of electronic consultations (e-consultations) compared with face-to-face consultations. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), based on the generic EQ-5D, was compared with ICER's based on RA-specific measures: the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). To compare the cost-effectiveness of these different measures, HAQ-DI and RAID were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) via estimated conversion equations. Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer a promising alternative for traditional measures in economic evaluations, capturing patient-relevant domains more comprehensively. Because PROMs are increasingly applied in clinical practice, the next step entails modeling of an RA patient-wide conversion equation to implement PROMs in economic evaluations. The conventional ICER (eg, EQ-5D) indicates that e-consultations are cost-effective with cost savings of -€161,000 per QALY gained for a prevalent RA cohort treated in a secondary trainee hospital. RA-specific measures show similar results, with ICERs of -€163,000 per HAQ-DI (QALY) and -€223,000 per RAID (QALY) gained. RA-specific measures capture patient-relevant domains and offer the opportunity to improve the assessment and treatment of the disease impact.

Exploring factors influencing patient activation in Saudi rheumatoid arthritis patients: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey-Results from the COPARA study.

To evaluate patient activation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using patient activation measure 13 (PAM-13) on a national level in Saudi Arabia. A national survey was administered across multiple centers in Saudi Arabia. Patient activation was assessed using the PAM-13. The Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology (CQR) and the RA Impact of Disease (RAID) tool were also administered. The data from the survey were analyzed, and the results were stratified based on activation level. All factors affecting patient activation were explored and reported. A total of 1241 participants were included. Most of the patients were females (85%), the mean age was 47 (±14), and most patients lived in the central region (47%). The mean (±standard deviation) patient activation score was 578.7 (±13.0). Patient activation was affected by multiple factors: demographic characteristics, such as education, with a beta value of 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64 ̶1.58, p < .001). Higher CQR scores were associated with higher activation levels, with a beta value of 2.61 (95% CI 0.80 ̶4.44, p = .005), and higher RAID scores were associated with lower activation levels, with a beta value of 3.13 (95% CI 1.36 ̶4.91, p = .001). Patient activation was affected by several demographic characteristics and the impact of RA. A higher activation may improve compliance. Future longitudinal studies are required to confirm these findings and should explore the underlying mechanism of these effects.

Effectiveness and feasibility of a mobile health self-management intervention in rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (AEGORA)

BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) considerably impacts patients’ lives. Patients’ confidence in their ability to manage this impact, or self-efficacy, can be supported with self-management interventions. One approach is to use mobile health (mHealth) applications, which can additionally provide insight into disease impact by remotely monitoring patient-reported outcomes. However, user engagement with mHealth-apps is variable, and concerns exist that remote monitoring might make patients overly attentive to symptoms.MethodsApp-based Education and GOal setting in RA (AEGORA) is a multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial investigating an mHealth-based self-management intervention to improve self-efficacy and remotely monitor disease impact in patients with RA. The intervention is provided via an adapted version of the application Sidekick (Sidekick Health, Reykjavik, Iceland) and consists of education, goal setting, lifestyle advice, and remote assessment of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) questionnaire.Across two centres, 120 patients will be recruited and randomised (2:1:1) to usual care or intervention group A/B (study app with weekly/monthly prompts to complete the RAID, respectively). Outcomes are assessed at baseline and after 4–6 months. The primary endpoint is a clinically important improvement (≥ 5.5/110) in the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale in the combined intervention group compared to usual care. Secondary endpoints are (a) non-inferiority regarding pain catastrophising, as a measure of symptom hypervigilance; (b) superiority regarding the RAID, sleep quality, and physical activity; and (c) participant engagement with the study app. Finally, the relationship between engagement, prompted frequency of RAID questionnaires, and the primary and secondary outcomes will be explored.DiscussionThe AEGORA trial aims to study the effectiveness of mHealth-based, multicomponent self-management support to improve self-efficacy in the context of RA, while providing potentially valuable insights into temporal disease activity dynamics and the feasibility and possible negative effects of remote symptom monitoring in this population.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT05888181. Retrospectively registered on March 23, 2023. Study inclusion started on March 3, 2023.

Disease activity and disease-related factors are drivers of patient global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-life cross-sectional study

Despite that the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) is widely used for measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) disease activity to define the remission state of the disease, the primary contributors influencing patients’ ratings are still debated. This study aims to determine which clinical, sociodemographic and lifestyle-related contextual factors might be key drivers of PGA in RA. This single-center cross-sectional study recruited 393 consecutive adult RA patients. Median age 60 years, females 306 (77.9%). Data related to disease activity were assessed by using Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), severity by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and impact by RA Impact of Disease (RAID). Sociodemographic/lifestyle features were collected. Disease remission was calculated using Boolean-based criteria 1.0 and 2.0. Quantile regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. The remission rate progressively increased from 15% by using SDAI with a Boolean 1.0-based definition to 43.5% using a Boolean 2.0-based remission. Among factors related to disease activity, the use of low-dose corticosteroids, the RAID items pain and sleep difficulties were predictive for worse PGA scores (p = 0.01). Among factors related to disease severity HAQ score and RAID total were independent factors associated with higher median PGA (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). RAID’s physical well-being was related to PGA scores (p = 0.01). An increasing trend in PGA was observed in longstanding diseases (> 15 years). Our results confirmed that there is no unambiguous interpretation of the PGA score. It is a measure related to some disease activity parameters, but it is also influenced by contextual factors related to disease severity and impact. These data highlighted that PGA should have a broad interpretation, thus supporting the proposal of a dual targets (biological and impact) approach to obtain a more accurate estimate of disease activity.

The Mediterranean diet, and not dietary inflammatory index, is associated with rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, the impact of disease and functional disability.

To assess the relationship between adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD) /individual Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and disease activity, disease impact, and functional status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients. RA patients followed at a hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, were recruited. DII was calculated using dietary intake data collected with a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Adherence to the MD was obtained using the 14-item Mediterranean Diet assessment tool. Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints (DAS28) and the DAS28 calculated with C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) were used to assess disease activity. Impact of disease and functional status were evaluated using the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) questionnaire and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), respectively. 120 patients (73.3% female, 61.8 ± 10.1years of age) were included. Patients with higher adherence to the MD had significantly lower DAS28-CRP (median 3.27(2.37) vs 2.77(1.49), p = 0.030), RAID (median 5.65(2.38) vs 3.51(4.51), p = 0.032) and HAQ (median 1.00(0.56) vs 0.56(1.03), p = 0.013) scores. Higher adherence to the MD reduced the odds of having a higher DAS28 by 70% (OR = 0.303, 95%CI = (0.261, 0.347), p = 0.003). Lower adherence to MD was associated with higher DAS28-CRP (β = -0.164, p = 0.001), higher RAID (β = -0.311, p < 0.0001), and higher HAQ scores (β = -0.089, p = 0.001), irrespective of age, gender, BMI and pharmacological therapy. Mean DII of our cohort was not significantly different from the Portuguese population (0.00 ± 0.17 vs -0.10 ± 1.46, p = 0.578). No associations between macronutrient intake or DII and RA outcomes were found. Higher adherence to the MD was associated with lower disease activity, lower impact of disease, and lower functional disability in RA patients.

Patient satisfaction with medication in rheumatoid arthritis: an unmet need.

Shared decision-making between rheumatologists and patients has become an overarching principle in current treatment recommendations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to assess the satisfaction of patients with RA with their treatment and to investigate the associated factors. A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Rheumatology Department of Mongi Slim Hospital. We included adults with RA receiving their current disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for at least 12 months.Satisfaction among patients was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) and it was defined by a score ≥ 80%. The factors indirectly influencing patient satisfaction that were assessed were: satisfaction with medical care management, disease activity, functional impact, professional impact, and the impact of RA. Multivariable regression analysis was applied to determine the predictors of satisfaction. We included 70 patients (63 female/7 male) with a mean age of 57.8 ±10.6 years. The mean disease duration was 13.71 ±7.2 years.Mean TSQM scores were 65.42 ±14.77 for convenience, 68.71 ±18 for effectiveness, 70.60 ±24.5 for side effects, and 67.95 ±17.10 for global satisfaction. Satisfaction rates were: 20% for convenience, 39% for effectiveness, 46% for side effects and 30% for global satisfaction.In multivariable analysis, the predictors of global dissatisfaction were Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) overall score (p = 0.003) and the degree of physical difficulties (p = 0.001). Satisfaction with the physician was correlated with better global satisfaction (p = 0.029). Difficulties in adapting to RA (p = 0.043) and current treatment with biologics (p = 0.027) were predictors of dissatisfaction with convenience. Predictors of dissatisfaction with efficiency were the RAID overall score (p = 0.032) and the difficulties of adapting to RA (p = 0.013). The predictors of satisfaction with side effects were a lower degree of interference with domestic work (p = 0.02) and better involvement of the patient in the treatment decision (p = 0.014). The satisfaction with the attending physician, the participation in the treatment decision, and the impact of RA seem to influence treatment satisfaction the most. These data suggest that a better understanding of patients' medical needs and preferences would improve satisfaction outcomes.

Is the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score a meaningful instrument for other inflammatory rheumatic diseases? A cross-sectional analysis of data from the German National Database

ObjectiveTo analyse the performance of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren’s syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myositis and...

Phenotypes of body composition, physical performance and quality of life in women with rheumatoid arthritis

To evaluate the frequency of different body composition phenotypes, physical performance (PP) and their relationship with quality of life in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study included 157 women (average age 58.68.8 years) with RA. Clinical and laboratory examination, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quality of life assessment according to the questionnaires EQ-5D (European Quality of Life Questionnaire), HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and RAID (Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease), determination of muscle strength and the PP of skeletal muscles were carried out. Osteoporotic, sarcopenic and osteosarcopenic phenotypes of body composition were identified in 27 (17%), 16 (10%) and 16 (10%) patients, respectively; 139 (88.5%) people had low muscle strength, and 96 (61.1%) had reduced PP. Quality of life according to the EQ-5D index and RAID, the severity of depression according to HADS in women with different phenotypes of body composition did not differ. Women with osteosarcopenic phenotype had worse indicators for EQ-5D-VAS (VAS visual analog scale), and patients with sarcopenic phenotype had more severe anxiety according to the HADS questionnaire compared to those with normal phenotype (p=0.014 and p=0.027, respectively). The quality of life according to all questionnaires was significantly worse in patients with reduced PP. Pathological phenotypes of body composition were found in 37% of RA patients. A decrease in muscle strength was revealed in 88.5%, and a low PP in 61.1% of patients. The relationship between quality of life and body composition has not been established, at the same time quality of life associated with the PP of skeletal muscles.

Patient Experienced Symptom State in rheumatoid arthritis: sensitivity to change in disease activity and impact.

The Patient Experienced Symptom State (PESS) is a single-question, patient-reported outcome that is validated to assess global disease impact in RA. This study addresses its sensitivity to change, and reliability. Disease activity, disease impact in the seven domains of RA Impact of Disease (RAID) and PESS were assessed in patients with RA from the NOR-DMARD registry, at two visits, 6 months apart. The PESS over the last week was scored at five levels, from 'very bad' to 'very good'. Disease impact and disease activity were compared between patients who improved, maintained or worsened PESS over time, through one-way analysis of variance, with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Correlations between changes in these parameters were assessed through Spearman's correlation coefficient. Sensitivity to change was assessed by standardized response mean (SRM) between the two visits. Reliability was analysed through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two visits in patients with stable disease activity and impact. In 353 patients [76.8% females, mean (s.d.) 9.9 (9.6) years disease duration], improvement in PESS level was associated with substantial improvements in mean impact in all domains as well as disease activity (P<0.02). PESS change was moderately to strongly correlated with RAID domains and disease activity (rho: 0.4-0.7). PESS was responsive to change (SRM: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.76), particularly among RAID responders (SRM: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.54, 1.99). PESS was moderately reliable in patients with stable condition (ICC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.83). PESS is valid, feasible, reliable and responsive, representing an opportunity to improve the assessment of disease impact with minimal questionnaire burden.

Exploring Factors Influencing Medication Compliance in Saudi Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey - Results from the COPARA Study.

PurposeCompliance is essential to achieve treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The current study evaluated compliance and related factors in a large and diverse population.Patients and MethodsPatients with RA who received active treatment were invited to participate in an online survey. The Arabic versions of the 5-Item Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology (ACQR-5) and the RA Impact of Disease (RAID) were used to measure compliance and disability, respectively. The patients were sub-grouped based on background disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Variables associated with high compliance were selected for the logistic regression analysis.ResultsA total of 1241 patients completed the survey and were included in the final analysis. Of those, 1055 (85%) were females with a mean (±SD) age and disease duration of 47.14 ± 13.71 and 8.77 ± 7.43 years, respectively. The mean RAID was 4.4±2.58, with 980 (79%) having an unacceptable level state. Patients with an unacceptable RAID level had a lower compliance rate (78.8% vs 85.8%, p = 0.001). Demographics associated with high compliance were female sex and increased age, with reported odds ratios of 1.018 (95% CI: 1.007–1.028) and 1.464 (95% CI: 1.016–2.108), respectively. Compliance was similar between patients on Janus kinase inhibitors or biological DMARDs (88.14% vs 80.83%, p = 0.17), between monotherapy, double therapy, or triple therapy recipients (80% vs 82.23% vs 81.32%, p = 0.665), and between patients receiving injectable and oral therapy (77.32% vs 81.14%, p = 0.246).ConclusionA high compliance level was observed in this population, with patient demographics influencing compliance rather than the medication type or route of administration. Interventional studies should focus on the of high-risk patients identified in this study.

Clinical performance of rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score: a real-life evidence from the multicenter nationwide registry BioStaR.

The rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) score was developed as a patient-derived composite response index for the evaluation of the disease impact on cases with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and performance of RAID score in the real-life settings. Cases with RA from our multi-center, nationwide registry called Biologic and targeted Synthetic antirheumatic drugs Registry RA (BioStaR RA) were included in this cross-sectional observational study. Demographic data, disease duration, pain, patient's global assessment (PGA) and physician's global assessment (PhyGA) were recorded. DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) were assessed as disease activity evaluations. The health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and RAID were completed by all the participants. The construct validity was tested by the analysis of correlations between RAID score and scores of PGA, disease activity indexes and HAQ-DI. We also evaluated the discriminatory ability of RAID to distinguish patients with different levels of disease activity and disability and the cut-off values were calculated by ROC analysis. 585 cases with RA were included in this investigation. The RAID score was significantly positively correlated with PGA, all disease activity indexes and HAQ-DI (p < 0.001). The discriminatory ability of RAID score in different disease activity and disability groups was also demonstrated (p < 0.001). To estimate DAS28-ESR (remission/low + moderate + high), RAID score cut-off points were 2.88 (sensitivity 73%, specificity 62%), 3.23 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 60%) and 3.79 (sensitivity 74%, specificity 58%), respectively. Our study indicated that RAID was a reliable tool in daily clinical practice by presenting its correlations with disease activity and disability assessments and by showing its discriminatory ability in these parameters in the real-life experiences.

AB0704 TELEMEDICINE AT THE TIME OF COVID-19: THE EXPERIENCE WITH RA PATIENTS TREATED WITH JAK-INHIBITORS

Background:The spread of COVID-19, the lockdown, the limited access to care reevaluated the role of tele-consultation and self-assessment.Objectives:Our aim was to evaluate in a cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients treated with JAK-inhibitors (JAKi): the self-assessed disease activity during lockdown, the lockdown impact on fatigue, anxiety, depression and the prevalence of Covid-19.Methods:We enrolled RA patients treated with baricitinib or tofacitinib. At baseline (BL) and follow-up we collected: patients’ demographic data, composite disease activity indices (CDAI, DAS28CRP), global assessment (PGA), pain visual analogue scale (VAS), FACIT (functional assessment of chronic illness therapy) and a self-rating scale for disease impact on anxiety and depression (Zung-A/D). Patients were instructed on how to perform self-assessment through video-material and fulfilled the online form of “Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease” (RAID)1 and “RA Disease Activity Index” (RADAI). To capture the pandemic effect, we compared patients in different status (remission, low, moderate and high-disease activity) at the last in-person visit (preCoV) through the DAS28CRP and CDAI, to the tele-health visit (THV), measured by the RAID. BL and pre-CoV ZUNG-A, ZUNG-D, FACIT questionnaires were compared with the online results during the pandemic. Exposure, tests and symptoms of Covid-19 were recorded. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation or median(IQR) according to distribution.Results:Twenty patients (median age 58.2±11.9 and mean disease duration 153.5 ± 112.7 months) were treated with tofacitinib and 27 with baricitinib. The median time-lapse between the pre-CoV visit and the THV was 12 (IQR 4) weeks. DAS28CRP and CDAI significantly decreased from BL to pre-CoV visit. During the last in-person visit, 21 patients (48.83%) were in remission, 9 (20.93%) in low disease activity; according to the RAID, 15 (31.91%) and 7 (14.89%) patients were respectively in remission and low disease activity during the THV (Table A). PGA and pain significantly decreased from BL to pre-Cov visit but worsened during the lockdown (Table A). FACIT remaining stable during THV. At THV, we detected a significant improvement of anxiety from BL (Zung-A) and a tendency to lower depression scores compared to BL (Table A). JAKi showed a good safety profile considering Covid-19 symptoms, none of the patients was diagnosed with SarsCoV2 infection.Conclusion:This is the first study on virtual assessment in RA patients treated with JAKi. The unique social experiment of the pandemic impaired the clinical response already achieved before the lockdown, without a collateral worseling of FACIT, anxiety and depression.

P135 Delivering a rheumatoid arthritis remote monitoring service during the COVID-19 pandemic: the patient's perspective

Background/Aims Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition fluctuating between unpredictable episodes of joint pain, stiffness and disability and low disease state or remission. The traditional outpatient model can lead to patients in disease remission being seen more frequently than necessary and with missed opportunity to capture disease flares. A remote monitoring service (RMS) was co-designed with RA patients which uses SMS communication to deliver the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) tool on a monthly basis whilst offering patients 2-way text message contact outside of hospital-based care. Methods Access to hospital-based rheumatology care was dramatically restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic. 126 patients engaged with the remote monitoring service between January 2019 to September 2020 were sent a satisfaction survey in October 2020. The survey used a combination of 5-point Likert scales and open questions to rate confidence in statements focused on four aspects of the RMS during the COVID-19 pandemic: 1. managing data 2. managing flares 3. managing me 4. managing appointments. Results 48.4% (61/126) patients responded to the survey. Managing data: 93.4% of patients who responded to the question strongly agreed/agreed data was safe and used for the purpose of care. 91.8% strongly agreed/agreed RAID responses were reviewed by the RMS monthly. 90.1% strongly agreed/agreed the RMS would contact them to review care if needed. Managing flares: 85.9% strongly agreed/agreed they could text into the RMS if having a flare of their condition. 75.4% strongly agreed/agreed they received the care needed using the RMS. 61.41% patient strongly agreed/agreed using the RMS helped manage flares better than before using the service. Managing me: 74.0% strongly agreed/agreed the RMS had made access to care easier. 82.0% strongly agreed/agreed the RMS helped them to feel looked after outside of hospital care. 72.0% strongly agreed/agreed the RMS looked after emotional well-being as well as physical health. 80.0% strongly agreed/agreed the RMS helped them to feel cared for during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Managing appointments: 43.8% strongly agreed/agreed rheumatology appointments were not always when needed. 39.6% strongly agreed/agreed they would consider deferring an appointment if well as an appointment approached. 79.2% strongly agreed/agreed they would be offered an appointment when needed. 72.9% strongly agreed/agreed a telephone or video consultation is an acceptable alternative to attending a hospital appointment. Conclusion RA patients using a remote monitoring service during the COVID-19 pandemic rated it highly for supporting flare management and emotional well-being, providing remote care and ensuring data security. Regular, remote capture of asynchronous patient data has the potential to facilitate flexible and responsive appointment scheduling to support the self-management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in delivering care when it is needed the most. Disclosure M.J. Martin: None. T. Garrood: None.

Vitamin D and VDR Gene Polymorphisms’ Association with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Lithuanian Population

Background and Objectives: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune, multi-factorial disease, in which environmental and genetic factors play a major role. RA is possibly linked to vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms, and research demonstrates that FokI variant susceptibility is associated with increased disease risk among Caucasians. The aim of this study was to evaluate vitamin D deficiency prevalence and its correlation to RA clinical parameters, and to determine the possible association of VDR gene polymorphisms and RA susceptibility in the Lithuanian population. Materials and Methods: Overall, 206 RA patients and 180 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos after informed consent was obtained. The disease activity score 28 C-reactive protein (DAS28 CRP), rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) score, and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) were recorded in RA patients, and 25(OH)D serum levels were evaluated by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay for all subjects. Four VDR gene polymorphisms, BsmI, FokI, ApaI, and TaqI, were assessed using real-time PCR instruments and genotyping assays in both groups. Results: The study registered a high prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency (<50 nmol/L) in RA patients (61.55% (n = 127)). The mean serum concentration in RA patients (44.96 ± 21.92 (nmol/L)) was significantly lower than in the healthy controls (54.90 ± 22.82 (nmol/L)), p < 0.0001. A significant inverse correlation between vitamin D level, DAS28 CRP, and HAQ scores was confirmed in RA patients, with p < 0.05. Still, there was no significant association between the overall risk of RA disease for any allele or genotype of the four VDR loci tested. Conclusions: The study confirmed that vitamin D deficiency is prevalent among RA patients and the 25(OH)D level is significantly lower compared with healthy controls. Lower vitamin D concentration was related with increased disease activity and disability scores. However, genetic analysis of four VDR polymorphisms did not confer the susceptibility to RA in Lithuanian population.

Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients

ObjectiveThe rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) questionnaire comprises seven patient-important domains of disease impact (pain, function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, emotional well-being, physical well-being, coping). RAID was validated as a...

Disease impact of rheumatoid arthritis in patients not treated with advanced therapies; survey findings from the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society.

ObjectiveThe aim was to reveal the everyday impact of living with RA in people not treated with advanced therapies (i.e. biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs).MethodsPeople with RA, with disease duration >2 years, not currently treated with advanced therapies, completed an online survey promoted by the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society. Items covered demographics, current treatment, RA flare frequency, the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) tool and questions reflecting work status and ability. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were performed.ResultsThere were 612 responses from patients having a mean age of 59 years, 88% female, 37.7% with disease duration 2–5 years and 27.9% with disease duration 5–10 years. In the last year, 90% reported an RA flare, with more than six flares in 23%. A RAID patient acceptable state was recorded in 12.4%. Each of the seven domains was scored in the high range by >50% respondents; 74.3% scored sleep problems and 72% fatigue in the high range. A need to change working hours was reported by 70%. Multivariable analyses revealed that increasing difficulties with daily physical activities, reduced emotional and physical well-being in the past week were all significantly associated with pain, number of flares and ability to cope (P < 0.005). The RAID score was significantly predictive of the number of flares.ConclusionPatients not currently treated with advanced therapies experience profound difficulties in everyday living with RA, across a broad range of measures. We advocate that patient-reported measures be used to facilitate holistic care, addressing inflammation and other consequences of RA on everyday life.