Quiescent-interval Single-shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography Research Articles

Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography May Outperform Carbon-Dioxide Digital Subtraction Angiography in Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Nephroprotective imaging in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is often crucial. We compared the diagnostic performance of non-contrast Quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS MRA) and carbon-dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2 DSA) in chronic lower extremity PAD patients. A 19-segment lower extremity arterial model was used to assess the degree of stenosis (none, <50%, 50–70%, >70%) and the image quality (5-point Likert scale: 1-non-diagnostic, 5-excellent image quality). Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for inter-rater reliability. Diagnostic accuracy and interpretability were evaluated using CO2 DSA as a reference standard. 523 segments were evaluated in 28 patients (11 male, mean age: 71 ± 9 years). Median and interquartile range of subjective image quality parameters for QISS MRA were significantly better compared to CO2 DSA for all regions: (aortoiliac: 4 [4–5] vs. 3 [3–4]; femoropopliteal: 4 [4–5] vs. 4 [3–4]; tibioperoneal: 4 [3–5] vs. 3 [2–3]; all regions: 4 [4–5] vs. 3 [3–4], all p < 0.001). QISS MRA out-performed CO2 DSA regarding interpretability (98.3% vs. 86.0%, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy parameters of QISS MRA for the detection of obstructive luminal stenosis (70%<) as compared to CO2 DSA were as follows: sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 96.9%, positive predictive value 89.1%, negative predictive value 94.8%. Regarding the degree of stenosis, interobserver variability for all regions was 0.97 for QISS MRA and 0.82 for CO2 DSA. QISS MRA proved to be superior to CO2 DSA regarding subjective image quality and interpretability for the imaging of chronic lower extremity PAD.

Quantification of popliteal artery narrowing with QISS MRA during active ankle plantarflexion in healthy, asymptomatic volunteers and its potential application in the diagnosis of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES).

To assess the degree of narrowing of the popliteal artery during active ankle plantar flexion in healthy volunteers using a non-contrast quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) technique. Following IRB approval, 10 healthy volunteers were recruited and following informed consent underwent QISS MRA of the lower extremity at rest and during ankle plantarflexion. Two pediatric musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed MR images in random order and recorded a number of subjective and objective anatomic variables including branch pattern, proximity of vessel to bony structures, gastrocnemius bulk, and presence of accessory muscle. Arterial narrowing with plantarflexion was recorded by a subjective assessment of 3D reconstructions (negligible or non-negligible) and objectively by measuring the narrowest diameter during plantarflexion and at rest. Agreement between reader scores was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for continuous variables, and kappa and the proportion of agreement for categorical variables. Mean reduction in arterial diameter during plantar flexion was 17.1% (min 1.9%, max 64.1%, SD 16.7%) for reader 1 and 17.2% (min 1.7%, max 50.0%, SD 14.3%.) for reader 2 with high agreement between readers: CCC = 0.92 and CI = 0.82, 0.96. Arterial narrowing was described subjectively as "non-negligible" in 7/20 legs by reader 1 and 5/20 legs by reader 2 with proportion of agreement = 0.90, CI (0.77, 1.00). We observed a wide range of popliteal arterial narrowing with plantarflexion in asymptomatic volunteers. Larger studies, for which QISS is well suited, may be invaluable for distinguishing physiologic from pathologic arterial narrowing in patients with suspected popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES).

Accuracy of non‐contrast quiescent‐interval single‐shot and quiescent‐interval single‐shot arterial spin‐labelled magnetic resonance angiography in assessment of peripheral arterial disease in a diabetic population

Diabetic patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are challenging to assess. Non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) offers a safe alternative in patients with renal impairment. The study objective is to evaluate accuracy of lower limb quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) MRA and pedal QISS-arterial spin-labelled (ASL) MRA for detection of significant stenosis in diabetic patients with PAD. Combined QISS and QISS-ASL MRA was performed in 32 diabetic PAD patients (20 male, 12 female; mean 69years; 8 with critical ischaemia). Two readers assessed haemodynamically significant (>50%) stenosis and diagnostic confidence on MRA, against digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard, with subgroup analysis of patients with severe renal impairment (n=7). Inter-reader agreement of stenosis and diagnostic confidence were evaluated. Test-retest reproducibility was evaluated in 10 subjects who underwent repeat MRA on a different day. At DSA, 262/645 segments (40.6%) had haemodynamically significant stenoses. MRA accuracy was 78.1% (478/612) and 75.6% (464/614), sensitivity 64.7% (161/249) and 77.5% (193/249), and specificity 87.3% (317/363) and 74.2% (271/365) for 2 readers. MRA accuracy was 80.9% and 80.7% for readers 1 and 2, respectively, in patients with severe renal impairment. QISS MRA but not pedal QISS-ASL MRA was considered of diagnostic image quality. Inter-reader agreement was moderate for stenosis (ĸ=0.60) and diagnostic confidence (ĸ=0.41). Test-retest reproducibility was high (ĸ=0.87) and moderate (ĸ=0.54) for individual readers. Quiescent-interval single-shot MRA has reasonable accuracy in a diabetic PAD population with high burden of disease, providing a non-contrast option in patients with renal impairment. QISS-ASL MRA requires further optimisation to be clinically feasible.

Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) at 3 tesla in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) vs contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the standard of reference. Method: Thirty-seven consecutive diabetic patients (mean age 71.8±7.2 years; 30 men) with CLI (Fontaine stage III–IV) underwent QISS-MRA and CE-MRA with calf compression; DSA was the standard. Image quality (5-point Likert-type scale) and stenosis severity (5-point grading) for QISS-MRA and CE-MRA were evaluated by 2 blinded readers in 1147 and 654 vessel segments, respectively. Per-segment and per-region (pelvis, thigh, calf) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Results: Image quality of QISS-MRA was lower compared with CE-MRA in the pelvic region (p<0.001 in both readers) and thigh region (p=0.033 in reader 1 and p=0.018 in reader 2), whereas in the calf region, the image quality of QISS-MRA was better than CE-MRA (p=0.009 in reader 1 and p=0.001 in reader 2). In segment-based analyses, there was no difference between QISS-MRA and CE-MRA in sensitivity [89.5% vs 90.3% in reader 1 (p=0.774) and 87.6% vs 90.6% in reader 2 (p=0.266)] or specificity [94.2% vs 92.9% in reader 1 (p=0.513) and 92.9% vs 92.9% in reader 2 (p>0.999)]. In region-based analyses, QISS-MRA and CE-MRA yielded similar sensitivity and specificity in all areas but the pelvic region for reader 2 (specificity 95.5% vs 84.8%, p=0.041). Conclusion: QISS-MRA performed very well in diabetic patients with CLI and was a good alternative for patients with contraindications to CE-MRA.

Multi-observer comparison study between unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography and invasive carbon dioxide angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease and chronic renal insufficiency

ObjectivesNon-contrast-enhanced quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) and invasive carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography are suggested as nephroprotective methods for accurate staging of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI). The aim of our study was to compare the image quality of both examinations. Methods16 consecutive PAD patients with highly impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73 m²) who underwent 3 T MRA with QISS and catheter angiography with CO2 within 90 days were retrospectively included. Subjective image quality was determined using a five-point Likert scale (1, non-diagnostic; 5, excellent) and presence of significant (≥50%) stenoses of pelvic and lower extremity arteries (21-segment-model) was evaluated per-region and per-segment, respectively, in random order by four independent readers with different levels of experience. CO2 angiography of an experienced interventional radiologist was considered the standard reference method. Results167 segments were available for direct comparison with a prevalence of ≥50% stenoses of 28.1%. QISS-MRA yield was: sensitivity 91.5%, specificity 94.2%, positive predictive value 86.0% and negative predictive value 96.6%, with an intraclass correlation coeffcient (ICC) of 0.88. Median values of qualitative imaging parameters for QISS-MRA were as follows: arterial signal intensity: 4 (pelvis), 5 (thigh), 5 (calf); venous overlay: 4, 5, 5; susceptibility artifacts: 5, 5, 5; motion artifacts: 4, 5, 5; ECG-related artifacts: 5, 5, 5. ICC-values for image quality were 0.74, 0.73, 0.93, 0.69 and 0.79, respectively. Arterial opacification at CO2 angiography was rated 3, 4, 3, with an ICC of 0.63. ConclusionsImage quality of non-invasive unenhanced MR angiography with QISS was preferred over invasive CO2 angiography, whilst taking into account that it offers high diagnostic performance for the detection and ruling out of PAD.

Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques.

The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced 2D quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and 3D turbo spin-echo (TSE)-based subtraction magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the assessment of peripheral arteries in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Nineteen consecutive patients (74% male, 72.8 ± 9.9years) with CLI underwent 2D QISS and 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA at 1.5T. Axial-overlapping QISS MRA (3mm/2mm; 1 × 1mm2) covered from the toes to the aortic bifurcation while coronal 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA (1.3 × 1.2 × 1.3mm3) was restricted to the calf only. MRA data sets (two readers) were evaluated for stenosis (≥50%) and image quality. Results were compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Two hundred and sixty-seven (267) segments were available for MRA-DSA comparison, with a prevalence of stenosis ≥50% of 41.9%. QISS MRA was rated as good to excellent in 79.5-96.0% of segments without any nondiagnostic segments; 89.8-96.1% of segments in 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA were rated as nondiagnostic or poor. QISS MRA sensitivities and specificities (segmental) were 92% and 95%, respectively, for reader one and 81-97% for reader two. Due to poor image quality of 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA, diagnostic performance measures were not calculated. QISS MRA demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance and higher robustness than 3D TSE-based subtraction MRA in the challenging patient population with CLI. • QISS MRA allows reliable diagnosis of peripheral artery stenosis in critical limb ischemia. • Robustness of TSE-based subtraction MRA is limited in critical limb ischemia. • QISS MRA allows robust therapy planning in PAD patients with resting leg pain.

Non-contrast-enhanced imaging of haemodialysis fistulas using quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) MRA: a feasibility study

To assess the efficiency of a novel quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) technique for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of haemodialysis fistulas. QISS MRA and colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) images were obtained from 22 haemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A radiologist with extensive experience in vascular imaging initially assessed the fistulas using CDU. Two observers analysed each QISS MRA data set in terms of image quality, using a five-point scale ranging from 0 (non-diagnostic) to 4 (excellent), and lumen diameters of all segments were measured. One hundred vascular segments were analysed for QISS MRA. Two anastomosis segments were considered non-diagnostic. None of the arterial or venous segments were evaluated as non-diagnostic. The image quality was poorer for the anastomosis level compared to the other segments (p<0.001 for arterial segments, and p<0.05 for venous segments), while no significant difference was determined for other vascular segments. QISS MRA has the potential to provide valuable complementary information to CDU regarding the imaging of haemodialysis fistulas. In addition, QISS non-enhanced MRA represents an alternative for assessment of haemodialysis fistulas, in which the administration of iodinated or gadolinium-based contrast agents is contraindicated.

ECG-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography of the lower extremities: Initial experience at 3 T

To evaluate the feasibility of unenhanced electrocardiography (ECG)-gated quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) of the lower extremities at 3 T. Twenty-five patients with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease underwent ECG-gated QISS-MRA and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) at 3 T. Two independent readers performed a per-segment evaluation of the MRA datasets. Image quality was rated on a four-point scale (1 = excellent to 4 = non-diagnostic; presented as medians with interquartile range). Diagnostic performance of QISS-MRA was evaluated using CE-MRA as the reference standard. QISS-MRA and CE-MRA of all patients were considered for analysis, resulting in 807 evaluated vessel segments for each MRA technique. Readers 1 and 2 rated image quality of QISS-MRA as diagnostic in 97.3% and 97% of the vessel segments, respectively. CE-MRA was rated diagnostic in all vessel segments. Image quality of the proximal vessel segments, including the infrarenal aorta, iliac arteries, and common femoral artery, was significantly lower on QISS-MRA compared to CE-MRA [image quality score across readers: 2 (1,3) versus 1 (1,1) p < 0.001]. In the more distal vessel segments, image quality of QISS-MRA was excellent and showed no significant difference compared to CE-MRA [image quality score across readers: 1 (1,1) versus 1 (1,1) p = 0.036]. Diagnostic performance of QISS-MRA was as follows (across readers): sensitivity: 87.5% (95% CI: 80.2-92.4%); specificity: 96.1% (95% CI: 93.6-97.6%); diagnostic accuracy: 94.9% (95% CI: 92.6-96.5%). QISS-MRA of the lower extremities is feasible at 3 T and provides high image quality, especially in the distal vessel segments.

Multimodality Imaging of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease

Patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affecting the lower extremities are initially evaluated with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) and segmental pressure measurements. An ABI 50% stenosis) with a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 96%, respectively.1 An ABI between 0.90 and 1.0 is considered borderline. The localization of the stenosis can be inferred by an abnormal decrease (>20 mm Hg) in segmental lower extremity pressures. In the presence of calcified atherosclerosis, arteries may become stiff and noncompressible, which results in a falsely elevated ABI (often >1.3). For patients with suspected PAD and a normal ABI at rest, it is valuable to obtain postexercise ABI measurements, which if <0.85 are consistent with PAD and is an independent predictor of mortality.2 Imaging is then needed to confirm the location and degree of stenosis before revascularization or if the diagnosis of PAD is uncertain. Characterization of PAD can be performed with noninvasive angiography using computed tomography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), as well as with duplex ultrasonography (US), depending on patient specific characteristics (Table 1). Advances in both CTA and MRA provide clinicians with the opportunity to obtain a high resolution, 3-dimensional (3-D) road map of the peripheral arterial tree in patients, particularly when planning revascularization strategies. Invasive digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been the accepted standard for evaluation of lower extremity atherosclerosis. Although DSA is a robust technique for diagnosing significant arterial stenosis or obstruction, it provides a 2-D view of the vessels, which may underestimate the degree of stenosis for tortuous vessels.3 Furthermore, there are inherent risks with arterial access, ionizing radiation, and the use of iodinated contrast media (CM).4 View this table: Table 1. Comparison Between CTA, MRA, and Duplex US for Diagnosis of PAD This review aims to deliver a comprehensive, yet concise …

Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MRA (QISS-MRA) of the lower extremities: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MRA

To evaluate electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) for nonenhanced assessment of peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) using contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) as the reference standard. Twenty-seven patients (mean age 66.6±10.8 years) with PAOD were included in the study. QISS-MRA and CE-MRA of the lower extremity were performed using a 1.5 T MR scanner. In each patient, subjective image quality and the degree of stenosis were evaluated on a four-point scale for 15 predefined arterial segments. Twenty-five of the 27 patients were considered for analysis. Subjective image quality of QISS-MRA was significantly lower for the distal aorta, pelvic arteries, and femoral arteries as compared to CE-MRA (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found for other vascular segments. The degree of stenosis was overestimated with QISS-MRA in 23 of 365 (6.3%) segments and underestimated in two of 365 (0.5%) segments. As compared to CE-MRA, QISS-MRA had a high sensitivity (98.6%), specificity (96%) as well as positive and negative predictive value (88.7 and 99.6%, respectively) for the detection of significant stenosis (≥50%). ECG-gated QISS-MRA is a promising imaging technique for reliable assessment of PAOD without the use of contrast material.

Evaluation of Peripheral Arterial Disease with Nonenhanced Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot MR Angiography

To assess the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, a nonenhanced two-dimensional electrocardiographically gated single-shot balanced steady-state free precession examination for the evaluation of symptomatic chronic lower limb ischemia. For this prospective institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, the institutional review board waived the requirement for informed patient consent. The QISS nonenhanced MR angiography technique was evaluated in a two-center trial involving 53 patients referred for lower extremity MR angiography for suspected or known chronic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with contrast material-enhanced MR angiography serving as the noninvasive reference standard. The accuracy of stenosis assessments performed with the nonenhanced MR angiography sequence was evaluated relative to the reference standard. Per-segment, per-region, and per-limb sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and assessments were considered correct only if they were in exact agreement with the reference standard-derived assessments. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling with use of an unstructured binomial logit analysis was used to account for clustering of multiple measurements per case. The sensitivity and specificity of QISS MR angiography for the determination of nonsignificant (<50%) versus significant (50%-100%) stenosis were compared with the sensitivity and specificity of the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of nonenhanced MR angiography was found to be nearly equivalent to the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Non-GEE segment-based analysis revealed that for the two reviewers, nonenhanced MR angiography had sensitivities of 89.7% (436 of 486 segments) and 87.0% (423 of 486 segments) and specificities of 96.5% (994 of 1030 segments) and 94.6% (973 of 1028 segments). QISS nonenhanced MR angiography offers an alternative to currently used imaging tests for symptomatic chronic lower limb ischemia, for which the administration of iodinated or gadolinium-based contrast agents is contraindicated.