ABSTRACT We are used to thinking of formal principles as either good or bad for gender expression. But might they be both, in some cases? This essay examines the recent work of queer formalism in narrative through the lens of a poetic verse form: the thirty-nine-line scheme of the sestina. Through this scheme, I show that formal principles contained in a single literary form can be conducive to the a priori antithetical notions of antinarrativity and queer relationality of form. On the one hand, the sestina exhibits a narrative-like metonymic extension through the repetition of end-words, a gesture that has been made queer through contemporary poems. On the other hand, the sestina inverts the linear temporality of narrative in its unique possibilities of anti-teleology through cyclic and non-linear stanzaic traversal, stemming from mathematical properties within abstract algebra. The duality produced in this single poetic form adds additional dimensions to queer formalist debates by splitting the problem of antinarrativity from the problem of formal constraint. I also show how Sara Ahmed’s Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others (2006) offers a reading of the orientations invoked by the sestina’s changing configurations of end-words.
Read full abstract