Quantification Of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Research Articles

Role of 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair-A Mini Review.

Edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) using MitraClip has been evolving rapidly in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high surgical risk or having contraindications for surgery. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography plays an important role in the management of severe MR. In particular, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging allows the evaluation of MV geometry and quantification of MR severity with dedicated software. Real-time 3D TEE is also commonly used to guide TMVr and facilitate the procedure. Further development of 3D echocardiography may help achieve safer and more beneficial results. The following article summarizes the current knowledge and the future perspectives of 3D TEE in TMVr.

Diagnostic Value of Left Ventricular Early Inflow-Outflow Index in Determining Severity of Mitral Regurgitation

Background: Determining severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) is very important, asit is related with prognosis and management of the disease. Currently, there is no goldstandard exists for quantification of MR severity using echocardiography. AmericanSociety of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines recommend several parameters basedon integrative criteria using color and spectral Doppler and anatomic measurement.Left Ventricular Early Inflow Outflow Index (LVEIO Index) was proposed as one parameterto assess the severity of MR by omitting geometric error from regurgitantvolume method. Thus, LVEIO index offers a simple, easy and accurate measurementin determining severity of MR.Methods: This study was a diagnostic test research with cross-sectional design. Thesubjects were all patients with organic mitral regurgitation who underwent echocardiographyexamination to measure severity of MR using the LVEIO index as well asother parameters measurements based on parameters of ASE guidelines. Diagnostictest was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negativepredictive value and accuracy of LVEIO index.Results: Of 49 patients in this study, 23 of them have severe MR and 26 are non-severeMR patients. The proportion of gender between two groups almost similar with an agerange from 56 to 61 years and the most common etiology finding was degenerative MR.Echocardiography examination showed the ejection fraction in severe MR was 63±4.2%and 64±3.9% in non-severe MR. The value of LAVI, MPAP, E-wave, VC, EROA andLVEIO index increased parallel with severity of MR (LAVI; 67±18.2 vs. 40±14.2 ml/m2,MPAP; 28±12.8 vs. 20±12.6 mmHg, E-wave 1.5±0.3 vs. 1±0.2 m/s, VC 0.8±0.3 vs.0.5±0.1 cm, EROA 0.4±0.1 vs 0,2±0,1cm2, LVEIO 9±2,4 vs. 5±1,8). The sensitivity,specificity, and accuracy of LVEIO index for diagnosis of severe MR were 86%, 84%,and 89%, respectively.Conclusion: LVEIO can be proposed as a relatively simple, easy and accurate methodin determining severity of MR.

Quantification of Mitral Valve Regurgitation: New Solutions Provided by 3D Echocardiography

The accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) using 2D imaging tools is difficult due to its structural complexity; however, it is crucially important in clinical medicine as MR severity has prognostic consequences. Novel 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and 3-dimensional (3D) color Doppler methods can provide quantitative and qualitative classification of MR including measurement of the vena contracta area, regurgitant volume, regurgitant fraction, and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA). Nevertheless, with so many conventional and developing techniques it can be difficult to decide which technique to use for selected patients. We suggest using an approach that is focused not only on the techniques and measurements but also combines imaging portability, availability, clinical efficiency, and accurate and reproducible assessments. In this review we discuss the established and emerging applications of 3D color Doppler for the quantification of MR severity.

Quantifying Mitral Regurgitation: Added Value of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Current three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic technology, including live 3D transesophageal echocardiography and single-beat 3D color Doppler imaging, are providing valuable new insight into the mechanism and quantification of mitral valve dysfunction. In this review we discuss important applications of 3D volumetric leaflet imaging with emphasis on the distinction between organic and functional mitral regurgitation. We also discuss the added benefit of current and emerging 3D color Doppler methods for the quantification of mitral regurgitation severity. The limitations of the 2D proximal isovelocity surface area method are discussed, along with potential solutions provided by 3D color Doppler imaging methods that do not require assumptions about the converging flow geometry. Methods to directly measure the vena contracta area of a regurgitant jet are presented along with recent validation studies comparing this method to a reference standard of cardiac MRI. In brief, we review the established and emerging applications of 3D color Doppler techniques for the quantification of mitral regurgitation severity.

Diagnostic Value of Vena Contracta Area in the Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation Severity by Color Doppler 3D Echocardiography

Accurate quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) is important for patient treatment and prognosis. Three-dimensional echocardiography allows for the direct measure of the regurgitant orifice area (ROA) by 3D-guided planimetry of the vena contracta area (VCA). We aimed to (1) establish 3D VCA ranges and cutoff values for MR grading, using the American Society of Echocardiography-recommended 2D integrative method as a reference, and (2) compare 2D and 3D methods of ROA to establish a common calibration for MR grading. Eighty-three patients with at least mild MR underwent 2D and 3D echocardiography. Direct planimetry of VCA was performed by 3D echocardiography. Two-dimensional quantification of MR included 2D ROA by proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method, vena contracta width, and ratio of jet area to left atrial area. There were significant differences in 3D VCA among patients with different MR grades. As assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, 3D VCA at a best cutoff value of 0.41 cm(2) yielded 97% of sensitivity and 82% of specificity to differentiate moderate from severe MR. There was significant difference between 2D ROA and 3D VCA in patients with functional MR, resulting in an underestimation of ROA by 2D PISA method by 27% as compared with 3D VCA. Multivariable regression analysis showed functional MR as etiology was the only predictor of underestimation of ROA by the 2D PISA method. Three-dimensional VCA provides a single, directly visualized, and reliable measurement of ROA, which classifies MR severity comparable to current clinical practice using the American Society of Echocardiography-recommended 2D integrative method. The 3D VCA method improves accuracy of MR grading compared with the 2D PISA method by eliminating geometric and flow assumptions, allowing for uniform clinical grading cutoffs and ranges that apply regardless of etiology and orifice shape.