Quality Of Gout Care Research Articles

Superiority of Low-Dose Benzbromarone Add-On to Low-Dose Febuxostat Compared With Febuxostat Monotherapy in Gout With Combined-Type Hyperuricemia.

There is an unmet need for simpler urate-lowering therapy (ULT) regimens that achieve the serum urate target and improve the overall quality of gout care. We report a comparative effectiveness trial of febuxostat monotherapy versus benzbromarone add-on to low-dose febuxostat in gout specifically with combined renal urate underexcretion and overload. A prospective randomized trial was conducted on patients with combined-type hyperuricemia and estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 1:1 randomly assigned to febuxostat and benzbromarone combination therapy (initially febuxostat at 20 mg/day, with benzbromarone at 25 mg/day added onto 20 mg/day of febuxostat if not at target) or febuxostat monotherapy (initially 20 mg/day, escalating to 40 mg/day if not at target). The primary end point at 12 weeks was the proportion achieving a serum urate (SU) level <360 μmol/L. Other outcomes included altered liver and kidney function, new-onset urolithiasis, and gout flares. There were 250 participants randomized; 219 completed 12-week treatment. More patients in the febuxostat and benzbromarone combination group achieved the SU target compared to patients in the febuxostat monotherapy group (75.5% vs 47.7%; odds ratio 3.37 [95% confidence interval 1.90-5.98]). Safety profiles were comparable between the two groups. Simply adding on low-dose benzbromarone (25 mg/day) to low-dose (20 mg/day) febuxostat showed superior urate lowering compared to febuxostat monotherapy in gout with a combined-type hyperuricemia. For selected patients, expedited achievement of the SU target in more than 75% of patients using one titration step and low xanthine oxidase inhibitor and uricosuric doses is a potential alternative to standard ULT regimens.

Changing paradigms in the management of gout.

The incidence and prevalence of gout have increased, as have comorbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney and cardiovascular disease. Gout is now the commonest type of inflammatory arthritis despite availability of safe, effective and potentially 'curative' urate-lowering drugs. Modern imaging studies show that gout is a chronic inflammatory crystal deposition disorder even at the first acute attack and they illuminate the need to eliminate urate crystals by continuing reduction of the serum urate below its solubility threshold. Clinical outcomes, adherence to therapy and quality of gout care in primary care and hospital practice can be greatly improved by better use of allopurinol and flare prophylaxis, greater patient engagement, education and follow-up, and by nurse-led models of care that employ a 'treat-to-target' principle (SUA< 360 or 300µmol/l). Advances in understanding the physiology and genetic control of urate transport in the kidney and gut have led to novel, more selective uricosuric drugs, and basic research on mediators of urate crystal-induced inflammation has pointed to alternative therapeutic targets for treating and preventing gout flares. Current guidelines for the management of gout and indications for the use of some more recently introduced drugs; febuxostat, lesinurad, pegloticase and interleukin-1 antagonists are also briefly reviewed.

Quality of gout care in the emergency departments: a multicentre study

BackgroundTo report on prevalence of gout flare in emergency departments and to report the quality of gout care in emergency departments and causes of admission at emergency departments.MethodsA retrospective chart review of visits that had a primary diagnosis in gout by the International Classification of Diseases, the tenth revision, at emergency departments from 6 universities in Thailand over a 5 year period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2016.ResultsSix hundred thirty-two visits were included to the study. Prevalence of gout flare in emergency departments was 0.04. Only 29.3% of the visits had arthrocentesis. 628/632 (99.4%) and 519/585 (88.7%) of the visits were prescribed medications in emergency departments and had home medications, respectively. Although all visits that were prescribed colchicine in emergency departments received adequate doses of colchicine, it was also found that more than 2.4 mg/day of colchicine was prescribed (3/394, 0.8%) for home medications. In addition, 183/343 (53.4%) of the visits with normal renal function were prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, prescribed NSAIDs in abnormal renal function (42/343, 12.2%) was also found. The interruption of dosing, including increase, decrease, addition or discontinuance of urate lowing therapy in a gout flare period was 42/632 (6.6%). The most common cause of admission was acute gouty arthritis (31/47, 66.0%).ConclusionsQuality of gout care in the emergency departments was not good. Inappropriate management of gout flare in emergency departments was demonstrated in our study, particularly with regard to investigations and pharmacological management. Gaps between clinicians and guidelines, the knowledge of clinicians, and overcrowding in emergency departments were hypothesized in the results.

Gout prevalence and predictors of urate-lowering therapy use: results from a population-based study

BackgroundGout has an increasing global prevalence. Underutilization of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is thought to be common, via both suboptimal dosing and poor medication adherence. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of self-reported gout and the key predictors of ULT use in those with gout in a representative population survey in South Australia.MethodsData were obtained from the Spring 2015 South Australian Health Omnibus Survey, a multilevel, systematic, survey in a representative population sample involving face-to-face interviews (n = 3005). This study analyzed responses from respondents aged ≥ 25 years (n = 2531) about self-reported gout, ULT use, sociodemographic factors, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities, using survey weighting. Univariate and subsequent adjusted logistic regression analyses on self-reported gout were performed. ULT use was divided into three categories (never use, prior use, and current use) and these data were analyzed using a multinomial logistic regression model.ResultsSelf-reported gout prevalence was 6.8% (95% CI 5.8, 7.9). The mean age of respondents with gout was 64 years (standard deviation 16) and 82% were male. As expected, older age, male gender, lower socioeconomic status (SES), and higher body mass index (BMI) were associated with gout, as were high alcohol consumption, current smoking, other forms of arthritis, and hypertension or hypercholesterolemia medication, after adjustment for sociodemographic variables. Two thirds of respondents with gout reported ULT use (36% current; 29% previous) with only 55% continuing treatment. Predictors of ULT use included male gender, low SES, and concomitant cholesterol-lowering therapy. Respondents with gout with a higher BMI were more likely to remain on ULT.ConclusionsDespite gout being a common, potentially disabling joint disease, only 55% of respondents with gout in this study adhered to ULT. Identification of key predictors of ULT use will provide guidance on prescribing strategy in clinical practice and on the quality of gout care in the community.

A roadmap for education to improve the quality of care in gout

To describe obstacles to optimum management of gout by primary care physicians and to propose educational interventions to improve care. In the past, gout education has been hampered by infrequency of continuing medical education courses, loss of excitement for a disease in which therapies have not changed (until recently), insufficient evidence-based medicine, and the lack of motivation by physicians to re-learn this disease once in active practice. We identify 10 common myths that impede appropriate treatment of gout, identify gaps in evidence-based medicine that perpetuate those myths, and propose opportunities to improve education on these myths. It is through better gout-centered education that quality of care in gout can be enhanced. Residency may be one of the key points of intervention. As more evidence-based medicine publications address the optimum management of gout, national re-education can occur. More outreach by community rheumatologists to primary care physicians through educational programs and improved referral letters can help re-educate practitioners. Lastly, an often overlooked engine to change physician practices is consumer education, but current patient education programs are lacking. Novel education interventions for physician trainees, primary care physicians, and patients are proposed to improve the care of patients with gout.

A natural experiment in the quality of care in gout

A natural experiment in the quality of care in gout

Gout treatment: What is evidence-based and how do we determine and promote optimized clinical care?

Gout, a common form of inflammatory arthritis, has been markedly understudied relative to other rheumatologic conditions. As a result, evidence guiding clinical management in gout has traditionally been lacking. Burgeoning data suggests that quality of gout care in gout is frequently suboptimal. In this paper, we examine the evidence supporting gout management strategies in clinical practice. In addition, we examine consensus building efforts that have culminated in the recent publication of gout management quality indicators. We also discuss the need for future initiatives aimed at improving patient safety and quality of care in gout.