Collaborative Quality Improvement Research Articles

Quality priorities related to the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: results from the COMPAS + quality improvement collaborative.

This study aims to describe the main type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) quality improvement (QI) challenges identified by primary care teams in the province of Quebec who participated in the COMPAS + QI collaborative. A qualitative descriptive design was used to analyse the results of 8 COMPAS + workshops conducted in 4 regions of the province between 2016 and 2020. Deductive content analysis was performed to classify the reported QI priorities under the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains; and proposed change strategies under the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) intervention functions. A total of 177 participants attended the T2DM COMPAS + workshops. Three QI priorities were identified: (1) lack of coordination and integration of T2DM care and services; (2) lack of preventive services for pre-diabetes and T2DM; and (3) lack of integration of the patients-as-partners approach to support T2DM self-management. The proposed QI strategies to address those priorities were classified under the education, training, persuasion, habilitation and restructuring BCW intervention functions. This study provides insights on how QI collaboratives can support the identification of QI priorities and strategies to improve T2DM management in primary care.

Consensus in ERAS protocols for ventral hernia repair: evidence-based recommendations from the ACHQC QI Committee.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are widely used in the post-operative care of hernia patients. Despite their prevalence, an absence of published consensus guidelines creates significant heterogeneity in practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate elements in ERAS protocols utilized in ventral hernia repair from institutions across the United States and provide consensus recommendations for each identified element. Institutional members of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) Quality Improvement (QI) committee submitted current ERAS protocols. Items within each protocol were classified as "elements", then assigned a topic. Any topic with ≥ 2 elements from separate institutions were labeled as a "theme," then grouped by stage in the patient care cycle. A brief review of current evidence was provided in addition to a ACHQC QI committee consensus statement. A total of 295 elements from 6 tertiary referral centers specializing in hernia care were compiled into 24 themes and grouped by four separate stages: Pre-Admission Optimization, Pre-Operative Care, Intra-operative Care, and Post-Operative Management. This article represents a multi-institutional review of ERAS protocols for ventral hernia repair and identifies common themes that may provide the framework for a unified ERAS protocol in hernia surgery. Future work may serve to develop societal guidelines defined specifically for enhanced recovery in ventral hernia repair.

Abstract 4136978: Six-month Changes in Lipid Management in the Veterans Affairs Lipid Optimization Reimagined Quality Improvement (VALOR-QI) Program

Background: US Veterans have a high burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD). While cholesterol management is one of the most effective approaches for reducing CVD burden, over two-thirds of Veterans with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are not optimally managed. Aims: To evaluate LDL-C monitoring, lipid lowering therapy (LLT) use, and LDL-C levels at baseline and six-months for Veterans in the Veterans Affairs Lipid Optimization Reimagined Quality Improvement (VALOR-QI) Program. Methods: VALOR-QI is a national quality improvement collaboration between the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the American Heart Association (AHA) with the goal of improving lipid management among Veterans with ASCVD. To assess and address barriers to achieving optimal lipid levels, Clinical Champions, Health Care Coaches, and participating providers from 50 VA sites work with AHA QI Consultants. Eligible Veterans (those with an ASCVD diagnosis at two outpatient or one inpatient visit or one ASCVD procedure) were considered engaged in VALOR-QI if they had a qualifying appointment with a participating provider during the program. We examined rates of LDL-C monitoring and LLT use at baseline (start of site monitoring) and 6 months after. Among Veterans who were in the program ≥6 months and had >1 LDL-C measure, we investigated percent meeting an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL at their first LDL-C (closest to their first visit with priority given to labs within 365 days before their first visit) and follow-up LDL-C (closest to 6 months after entering the program) and mean LDL-C change (paired t-test). Results: Six months after starting VALOR-QI, sites had a 41% increase in LDL-C monitoring and a 6% increase in LLT use. Among 29,610 Veterans engaged in the program ≥6 months with at least two lipid labs [mean (SD) age 71.0 (9.3) years, 95% men, 72% white race], the proportion who met the LDL-C goal <70 mg/dL increased from 44% at their first measure to 51% at 6-month follow-up. Among these Veterans, we observed a mean LDL-C decrease of 5.1 mg/dL (95% CI: -5.50, -4.78). Conclusion: We observed an increase in lipid monitoring and LLT use and improved LDL-C at 6-month follow-up among US Veterans engaged in VALOR-QI.

Improving Patient Wait Times on the First Day of Radiotherapy Treatment

Long wait times on starting day of radiotherapy (day 1) can cause dissatisfaction among both patients and healthcare providers. Reducing these wait times will decrease stress and decongest hospital facilities especially in current coronavirus disease 2019 times. A multidisciplinary core team was formed during the Stanford-India Collaborative Quality Improvement training to reduce the median wait times on day 1 of treatment from 6 to 4.5 hours (a 25% reduction). Several factors were identified on the fishbone diagram, and key causes were identified using a Pareto chart and action prioritization matrix. The Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle strategy was undertaken for the identified interventions. The outcome measure was time from arrival at the hospital to entry into a treatment room. Data were obtained from time charts at various stations and electronic records. The secondary measures were visual analog scale (VAS) scores, 80th percentile wait times, and the day-2 delay percentage. The balancing measure was “new errors” due to interventions. The interventions included the completion of all administrative tasks not needing patients' presence on the day before day 1. Baseline data from 198 patients and postintervention data from 160 patients were compared and analyzed. The median wait time at baseline, which was 6 hours, was reduced to 4.2 hours. The VAS score showed 70.4, 67.7, and 71.9% satisfaction for the resident physician, therapists, and patients, respectively. The 80th percentile wait times reduced from 8 to 5.7 hours; and the day 2 starting rate decreased from 22.5 to 2.04%, with no new errors reported. Radiotherapy day 1 wait times can be safely decreased, leading to improved satisfaction among patients and healthcare providers, by utilizing classic quality improvement methods and tools.

The role of QI collaboratives in neonatology.

Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) use their collective experiences from participating centers to accelerate the translation of evidence into practice, resulting in reduced variation and improved clinical outcomes. There are several regional, national, and international QICs in neonatology. In this review, we discuss the framework and evaluate national QICs primarily based in US and share the contributions of selected studies. We found that the QICs in neonatology play a significant role in identification of target topics, developing best practices, improving provider knowledge, building QI capacity, and improving outcomes. The key strengths of QICs are that they produce more generalizable learnings, involve a larger patient population which enhances statistical analysis, and offer resources to smaller institutions. Limitations include institutions contributing unequally to the overall results, difficulty in interpreting results when multiple improvement strategies are applied simultaneously, and the possible lack of academic recognition for individual center leadership.

Perioperative Quality Improvement in Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium NICUs.

Infants admitted to NICUs in children's hospitals represent a different population than those in a traditional birth hospital. The patients in a children's hospital NICU often have the most complex neonatal diagnoses and are cared for by various subspecialists. The Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium is a collaborative of more than 40 NICUs that collect data and perform quality improvement (QI) work across the United States and Canada. The collaborative's database provides an opportunity to benchmark clinical outcomes for this specialized population and to support the QI efforts. In this review, we summarize the success of individual collaborative QI projects focused on improving the care of the neonate in the perioperative period related to clinical team handoffs, postoperative hypothermia prevention, and improvement of postoperative pain management. The collaborative's experience can serve as a model for other national collaboratives seeking to support QI efforts.

Research prioritization in hernia surgery: a modified Delphi ACHQC and VHOC expert consensus

PurposeNumerous clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements have been published in hernia surgery, however, there is still a need for high-quality evidence to address remaining unanswered questions. The aim of this study was to conduct research priority setting through a modified Delphi process to identify a list of top research priorities in hernia surgery.MethodsA structured literature review of clinical practice guidelines was performed by the steering committee. Topics considered clinically significant, practical to study and lacking strong evidence were extracted and refined into a comprehensive list, then entered into a two-round Delphi survey for prioritization at the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) Quality Improvement Summit. In round 1, participants were instructed to select any topic that should be prioritized for future research. Topics were ranked according to the proportion of votes and the 25 highest-ranking topics were included in the second round. In round 2, participants were instructed to select only the top 10 topics for research prioritization.ResultsEleven clinical practice guidelines were reviewed. Eighty-seven topics were extracted by the steering committee and submitted for prioritization. After the first round, 25 of the highest-ranking topics were determined and included in the second round. A final list of 11 research questions was identified. The hernia types with the most research interest were inguinal and epigastric/umbilical hernias. Other topics of high interest were the management of diastasis recti, primary versus mesh repairs and expectant management versus surgical repair.ConclusionOur study provides a research agenda generated through expert consensus that may be used in the prioritization of the design and funding of clinical trials in hernia surgery.

Increasing Access to Connected Insulin Pens by Promoting Shared Decision-Making Through Collaborative Quality Improvement.

Increasing Access to Connected Insulin Pens by Promoting Shared Decision-Making Through Collaborative Quality Improvement.

Optimising antibacterial utilisation in Argentine intensive care units: a quality improvement collaborative

BackgroundThere is limited evidence from antimicrobial stewardship programmes in less-resourced settings. This study aimed to improve the quality of antibacterial prescriptions by mitigating overuse and promoting the use of narrow-spectrum...

Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cardiovascular Quality Improvement Strategy in India: The C-QIP Trial

BackgroundQuality of chronic care for cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains suboptimal worldwide. The Collaborative Quality ImProvement (C-QIP) trial aims to develop and test the feasibility and clinical effect of a multicomponent strategy among patients with prevalent CVD in India. MethodsThe C-QIP is a clinic-based, open randomized trial of a multicomponent intervention versus usual care that was locally developed and adapted for use in Indian settings through rigorous formative research guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The C-QIP intervention consisted of 5 components: 1) electronic health records and decision support system for clinicians, 2) trained non-physician health workers (NPHW), 3) text-message based lifestyle reminders, 4) patient education materials, 5) quarterly audit and feedback reports. Patients with CVD (ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, or heart failure) attending outpatient CVD clinics were recruited from September 2022 to September 2023 and were randomized to the intervention or usual care arm for at least 12 months follow-up. The co-primary outcomes are implementation feasibility, fidelity (i.e., dose delivered and dose received), acceptability, adoption and appropriateness, measured at multiple levels: patient, provider and clinic site-level, The secondary outcomes include prescription of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) (provider-level), and adherence to prescribed therapy, change in mean blood pressure (BP) and LDL-cholesterol between the intervention and control groups (patient-level). In addition, a trial-based process and economic evaluations will be performed using standard guidelines. ResultsWe recruited 410 socio-demographically diverse patients with CVD from four hospitals in India. Mean (SD) age was 57.5 (11.7) years, and 73.0% were males. Self-reported history of hypertension (48.5%) and diabetes (41.5%) was common. At baseline, mean (SD) BP was 127.9 (18.2) /76.2 (11.6) mm Hg, mean (SD) LDLc: 80.3 (37.3) mg/dl and mean (SD) HbA1c: 6.8% (1.6%). At baseline, the GDMT varied from 62.4% for patients with ischemic heart disease, 48.6% for ischemic stroke and 36.1% for heart failure. ConclusionThis study will establish the feasibility of delivering contextually relevant, and evidence-based C-QIP strategy and assess whether it is acceptable to the target populations. The study results will inform a larger scale confirmatory trial of a comprehensive CVD care model in low-resource settings. Trial registrationClinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2022/04/041847; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT05196659

The Tennessee Heart Health Network effectiveness study: A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of statewide quality improvement cooperative participation on cardiovascular outcomes

BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of premature morbidity and mortality in the United States and Tennessee ranks among the highest in CVD events. While patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) evidence-based approaches that reach beyond the traditional doctor-patient visit hold promise to improve CVD care and prevent serious complications, most primary care providers lack time, knowledge, and infrastructure to implement these proven approaches. Statewide primary care quality improvement (QI) collaboratives hold potential to help address primary care needs, however, little is known regarding their effectiveness in improving uptake of PCOR evidence-based population health approaches and improving CVD outcomes. This study describes the design and implementation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of participation in a statewide quality improvement cooperative (The Tennessee Heart Health Network [TN-HHN]) on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods/designThe TN-HHN Effectiveness Study randomized 77 practices to 4 waves (i.e., clusters), with each wave beginning three months after the start of the prior wave and lasting for 18 months. All practice clusters received one of three Network interventions, and outcomes are measured for each three months both in the control phase and the intervention phase. Primary outcomes include Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services measures for aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol control, and smoking cessation (ABCS). ConclusionsThis trial, upon its conclusion, will allow us to assess the effect of participation in a statewide quality improvement cooperative on cardiovascular outcomes as well as key contributors to successful practice transformation.

Data-driven collaborative QUality improvement in Cardiac Rehabilitation (QUICR) to increase program completion: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of deaths and disability worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) effectively reduces the risk of future cardiac events and is strongly recommended in international clinical guidelines. However, CR program quality is highly variable with divergent data systems, which, when combined, potentially contribute to persistently low completion rates. The QUality Improvement in Cardiac Rehabilitation (QUICR) trial aims to determine whether a data-driven collaborative quality improvement intervention delivered at the program level over 12 months: (1) increases CR program completion in eligible patients with CHD (primary outcome), (2) reduces hospital admissions, emergency department presentations and deaths, and costs, (3) improves the proportion of patients receiving guideline-indicated CR according to national and international benchmarks, and (4) is feasible and sustainable for CR staff to implement routinely.MethodsQUICR is a multi-centre, type-2, hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with 12-month follow-up. Eligible CR programs (n = 40) and the individual patient data within them (n ~ 2,000) recruited from two Australian states (New South Wales and Victoria) are randomized 1:1 to the intervention (collaborative quality improvement intervention that uses data to identify and manage gaps in care) or control (usual care with data collection only). This sample size is required to achieve 80% power to detect a difference in completion rate of 22%. Outcomes will be assessed using intention-to-treat principles. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models accounting for clusters within allocated groupings will be applied to analyse primary and secondary outcomes.DiscussionAddressing poor participation in CR by patients with CHD has been a longstanding challenge that needs innovative strategies to change the status-quo. This trial will harness the collaborative power of CR programs working simultaneously on common problem areas and using local data to drive performance. The use of data linkage for collection of outcomes offers an efficient way to evaluate this intervention and support the improvement of health service delivery.EthicsPrimary ethical approval was obtained from the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH01093), along with site-specific governance approvals.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623001239651 (30/11/2023) (https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386540&isReview=true).

Adherence to AUA guidelines for the work‐up, medical management, surgical evaluation and treatment of BPH: Work from a quality improvement collaborative

AbstractIntroductionPrevious studies noted varied adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), but studies are yet to quantify adherence to American Urological Association BPH guidelines. We studied guideline adherence in the context of a new quality improvement collaborative (QIC).MethodsData were collected as part of a statewide QIC. Medical records for patients undergoing select CPT codes from January 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for adherence to selected BPH guidelines.ResultsMost men were treated with transurethral resection of the prostate. Notably, 53.3% of men completed an IPSS and 52.3% had a urinalysis. 4.7% were counseled on behavioral modifications, 15.0% on medical therapy, and 100% on procedural options. For management, 79.4% were taking alpha‐blockers and 59.8% were taking a 5‐ARI. For evaluation, 57% had a PVR, 63.6% had prostate size measurement, 37.4% had uroflowmetry, and 12.3% were counseled about treatment failure. Postoperatively, 51.6% completed an IPSS, 57% had a PVR, 6.50% had uroflowmetry, 50.6% stopped their alpha‐blocker, and 75.0% stopped their 5‐ARI.ConclusionsThere was adherence to preoperative testing recommendations, but patient counseling was lacking in the initial work‐up and preoperative evaluation. We will convey the data to key stakeholders, expand data collection to other institutions, and devise an improvement implementation plan.

Spreading Standardized Documentation of Pediatric Occupational and Physical Therapy Dose: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Clinicians and researchers can leverage clinical documentation of therapy services for quality improvement and research purposes. However, documentation is often institution specific and may not adequately capture the dose of therapy delivered, thus limiting collaboration. To implement documentation of pediatric occupational and physical therapy dose from one institution to another institution. Dose documentation includes the frequency, intensity, time, and type of interventions delivered (FITT Epic® Flowsheet) at each session. Prospective time-series quality improvement study. Two large urban pediatric hospitals. Occupational and physical therapy staff members. Staff training and feedback loops utilizing existing groups. The process measure (number of available staff trained and using the FITT Epic Flowsheet over time) and the outcome measure (percentage of FITT Epic Flowsheets used for treatment visits each month) were analyzed using a statistical process control chart. The balancing measure (percentage of notes closed before 7 p.m. on the same day as the encounter) was analyzed using mean per month across three time periods. Fifty-seven staff members (68%) attended formal training. On average, clinicians documented 90% of sessions using the FITT Epic Flowsheet after implementation. There was no change observed in the balancing measure. Documentation of dose was spread from one institution to another. Shared documentation will facilitate future collaboration for quality improvement and research purposes. Occupational therapy practitioners and leaders should consider implementing documentation with common dose elements. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapy documentation is often institution specific and may not adequately capture the dose of therapy (frequency, intensity, time) or types of interventions that were delivered, thus limiting opportunities for collaboration between institutions. This article adds to the literature on administrative supports for clinical and quality improvement research by illustrating a specific example of how documentation of dose can be shared from one institution to another. The data show that clinicians at one institution started using a new style of documentation using the FITT Epic® Flowsheet and shared discrete dose elements with another institution, creating new opportunities for collaboration. Shared documentation can facilitate future collaboration for quality improvement and research purposes.

Quality improvement collaborative for improving patient care delivery in Argentine public health sector intensive care units

BackgroundThe demand for healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic was excessive for less-resourced settings, with intensive care units (ICUs) taking the heaviest toll.ObjectiveThe aim was to achieve adequate personal protective...

Can remote testing for chronic kidney disease improve outcomes without widening existing health inequalities? A collaborative quality improvement project in primary care.

In the UK, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent, silent and strong predictor of cardiovascular disease. Identification of CKD is poor in primary care, particularly in minority ethnic and socio-economically deprived groups. To investigate feasibility of remote ACR testing to improve the detection and management of CKD in underserved groups. 13 591 tests were sent out across South East London. Individuals with diabetes and no ACR in the past year were offered a remote ACR test to complete at home with a smartphone using a validated app (Healthy.io). We extracted data on demographics, medical comorbidities and medication. Analyses (Stata) describe who completed the test. Twenty-seven practices agreed to participate. Analyses of 6082 tests sent show the test completion rate was 46.8%. Adjusted odds ratios demonstrated that people were less likely to complete testing if over 70 years (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89) and over 80 (OR 0.43, CI 95% 0.33 to 0.56) compared to <40 years old; people from CORE20 groups (most deprived quintile) were also less likely to complete testing (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.76) and those with missing data and those with no recorded healthcare interactions within the last 5 years were also less likely to complete testing. Remote ACR testing presents an opportunity to diagnose early CKD but there is still inequity in who completes testing. Engagement with stakeholders is needed to explore innovative ways to implement remote ACR testing to achieve equitable CKD screening.

Moving from Prove to Improve: A collaborative continuous quality improvement process for advancing clinical and translational science

Moving from <i>Prove</i> to <i>Improve</i>: A collaborative continuous quality improvement process for advancing clinical and translational science

Supplementing Best Care with Specialized Rehabilitation Treatment in Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Study by Different Expert Centers.

Background: This is a retrospective longitudinal study comparing 374 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who were treated in centers offering a specialized program of enhanced rehabilitation therapy in addition to expert outpatient care to 387 patients with PD, who only received expert outpatient care at movement disorders centers in Italy. Methods: The data are from subjects recruited in the Parkinson's Outcome Project (POP) at six Italian centers that are part of a multicenter collaboration for care quality improvement (the Fresco Network). The effects were measured with a baseline and a follow-up clinical evaluation of the Timed-Up-and-Go test (TUG), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), and Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI), the number of falls and hospitalizations for any cause. We used a generalized linear mixed model with the dependent variables being the response variable, which included the covariates demographics, evaluation, and treatment variables. Results: We found that the subjects who underwent specialized enhanced rehabilitation had a better motor outcome over time than those who were managed by expert neurologists but had participated in community programs for exercise and other allied health interventions. The greatest effects were seen in patients in the early stages of the disease with a high amount of vigorous exercise per week in the last six months. Similar effects were seen for PDQ39, MCSI, the number of falls, and hospitalization. Conclusions: Long-term benefits to motor function and the quality of life in patients with PD and burden reduction in their caregivers can be achieved through a systematic program of specialized enhanced rehabilitation interventions.

Improving pediatric atopic dermatitis care in the emergency department and primary care setting: a collaborative quality improvement pilot project.

Emergency department visits and healthcare expenditures for pediatric atopic dermatitis have been increasing over the last two decades. There is a paucity of replicable quality improvement initiatives addressed at educating primary care and emergency medicine clinicians on this condition. The goal of this initiative was to improve clinician knowledge and comfort in the diagnosis and management of pediatric atopic dermatitis and superinfection. Clinicians were recruited via email from academic and community settings in Travis County, Texas, in 2020. They were sent a pre-intervention survey, a series of three quizzes, and a post-intervention survey. After each quiz, participants received performance feedback and various forms of multimodal education. Differences between the first and final quiz scores and clinician confidence levels were analyzed for statistical significance. Fifty-six clinicians completed the intervention. The average overall and treatment-specific scores increased significantly by 10% and 37%, respectively. Further, confidence levels improved significantly in the majority of clinicians. Clinician qualitative feedback revealed high satisfaction. Results from this educational quality improvement project have demonstrated that this is an effective and replicable resource for educating clinicians who manage pediatric atopic dermatitis in the emergency department and outpatient setting.

ECHO+: An Innovative Technology-Enabled Collaborative Learning and Quality Improvement Program Strengthening Rural Primary Care in Arkansas, West Virginia, and Oklahoma

Summary: In this paper, we describe the Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes+ (ECHO+) model and evaluation plan for incorporating changes to primary care delivery, improving patient and clinician outcomes, and making long-term system improvements.