Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Research Articles

Clinical Usefulness of the Active Fixation Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Compared With the Passive Fixation Quadripolar Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

This study compared the stability of the Medtronic Attain Stability Quad (ASQ), a novel quadripolar active fixation left ventricular (LV) lead with a side helix, to that of conventional quadripolar leads with passive fixation (non-ASQ) and evaluated their LV lead performance.Methods and Results: In all, 183 consecutive patients (69 ASQ, 114 non-ASQ) who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) between January 2018 and June 2021 were enrolled. Complications, including elevated pacing capture threshold (PCT) levels, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), and LV lead dislodgement, were analyzed during the postimplantation period until the first outpatient visit after discharge. The frequency of LV lead-related complications was significantly lower in the ASQ than non-ASQ group (14% vs. 30%, respectively; P=0.019). Specifically, LV lead dislodgement occurred only in the non-ASQ group, and elevated PCT levels were significantly lower in the ASQ group (7% vs. 23%; P=0.007). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a significantly lower incidence of LV lead-related complications in the ASQ group (log-rank P=0.005). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed a significant reduction in lead-related complications associated with ASQ (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.83; P=0.011). The ASQ group exhibited fewer LV lead-related complications requiring reintervention and setting changes than the non-ASQ group. Thus, the ASQ may be a favorable choice for CRT device implantation.

PO-05-029 VENTRICULAR PACING IS RELIABLE WITH A SINGLE LEFT VENTRICULAR QUADRIPOLAR LEAD AND A PLUGGED RIGHT VENTRICULAR PORT IN PATIENTS WITH TRICUSPID VALVE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT

Transvenous ventricular pacing with a lead crossing a repaired or bioprosthetic tricuspid valve (TV) is undesirable due to the potential effect of permanent pacing leads on repaired or replaced TV function. One potential alternative is left ventricular (LV) pacing via the coronary sinus; however, LV pacing leads are associated with higher thresholds, potential for phrenic nerve stimulation, and lead instability requiring revision. While quadripolar LV leads offer improved lead stability and programmability from multiple electrode pair options, only Abbott CRT-P generators allow for sensing from an IS-4 lead without requiring an IS-1 lead plugged into the right ventricular (RV) port. Feasibility and outcomes with this pacing technique have not been previously reported. To study the reliability of LV-only pacing with a quadripolar lead and plugged RV port in patients with tricuspid valve repair or replacement. 10 consecutive patients with prior TV bioprosthesis or repair underwent quadripolar LV lead placement in CS branch veins with plugged RV port and were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, procedure data, interrogation data and need for reprogramming or lead revision were collected over 16 months mean follow-up. Successful implantation an Abbott CRT-P device with LV quadripolar lead with a plugged RV port was achieved in all patients. 5/10 of these cases involved the concomitant extraction of an RV lead. The target branch vein selected was that which would provide the best perceived lead stability, which was the AIV in two patients and MCV in one patient. Implant LV lead thresholds ranged from 0.75V @ 0.4ms to 2.25V @ 0.4ms with little change in follow-up thresholds, which ranged from 0.5V @ 0.4s to 2.25V @ 0.4ms. No patient experienced undersensing or oversensing in follow-up and R waves were greater than 5 mV in all patients. No patients required lead revision and no patients developed a pacing induced cardiomyopathy (drop in LVEF ≤ 10%) with LV only pacing. Durable ventricular pacing utilizing a single quadripolar LV lead and CRT-P generator is feasible when a transvenous RV lead is undesirable. This can be achieved by utilizing a single manufacturer’s CRT-P generator with unique capability of ventricular sensing from the IS-4 port despite plugged RV IS-1 port. This technique is an attractive alternative to standard dual chamber pacing in patients with prior TV repair or bioprosthesis to reduce risk of future valve dysfunction.Tabled 1PatientAgeSexPacing IndicationRelative Contraindication for RV LeadLV Lead Implant VeinLV Sensing at ImplantLV Sensing at Follow-upLV Threshold at ImplantLV Threshold at Follow-upVP %Preimplant LVEFLast Follow-up LVEF169FSND / Paroxysmal AVBTricuspid Repair, annuloplastyMCV10.8mV>12mV[email protected][email protected]<1%60-65%60-65%233MParoxysmal AVBBioprosthetic Tricuspid ValvePosterolateral branch5.1mV7.2mV[email protected][email protected]2%50%64%342MComplete heart blockBioprosthetic Tricuspid ValvePosterior branch>12mV12mV[email protected][email protected]97%>55%>55%465FSinus node dysfunctionTricuspid Repair, annuloplastyAIV>12mV12mV[email protected][email protected]<1%35-40%35-40%526FComplete heart blockTricuspid Repair, annuloplastyAnterolateral branchNone at VVI 30None at VVI 30[email protected][email protected]92%50%51%669FComplete heart blockSevere TR, Anticipated Tricuspid ClipAIV11.4mV>12mV[email protected][email protected]98%>55%>55%765FSinus node dysfunctionTricuspid Repair, annuloplastyPosterolateral branch8.3mV7mV[email protected][email protected]4%55-60%58%831MComplete heart blockBioprosthetic Tricuspid ValvePosterior branchNone at VVI 30None at VVI 30[email protected][email protected]91%>55%58%957FComplete heart blockBioprosthetic Tricuspid ValveAnterolateral branch12mVNone at VVI 30[email protected][email protected]99%59%56%1057MComplete heart blockBioprosthetic Tricuspid ValvePosterolateral branchNone at VVI 30None at VVI 30[email protected][email protected]98%55-60%55-60% Open table in a new tab

Acute and long-term outcomes of quadripolar IS-4 versus bipolar IS-1 left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A retrospective registry study.

The implantation procedure of left ventricular (LV) leads and the management of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients can be challenging. The IS-4 standard for CRT offers additional pacing vectors compared to bipolar leads (IS-1). IS-4 leads improve procedural outcome and may also result in lower adverse events during follow-up (FU) and improve clinical outcome in CRT patients. Further long-term FU data comparing the two lead designs are necessary. In this retrospective, single-center study we included adult patients implanted with a CRT-Defibrillator (CRT-D) or CRT-Pacemaker (CRT-P) with a quadripolar (IS-4 group) or bipolar (IS-1 group) LV lead and with available ≥3 years clinical FU. The combined primary endpoint was a combination of predefined, lead-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints were all single components of the primary endpoint. Overall, 133 patients (IS-4 n = 66; IS-1 n = 67) with a mean FU of 4.03 ± 1.93 years were included. Lead-related adverse events were less frequent in patients with an IS-4 lead than with an IS-1 lead (n = 8, 12.1% vs. n = 23, 34.3%; p = .002). The secondary outcomes showed a lower rate of LV lead deactivation/explantation and LV lead dislodgement/dysfunction (4.5% vs. 22.4%; p = .003; 4.5% vs. 17.9%; p = .015, respectively) in the IS-4 patient group. Less patients suffered from unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation with an IS-4 lead (3.0% vs. 13.4%; p = .029). LV lead-related re-interventions were fewer in case of an IS-4 lead (6.1% vs. 17.9%; p = .036). In this retrospective analysis, the IS-4 LV lead is associated with lower lead-related complication rates than the IS-1 lead at long-term FU.

Response rate in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients implanted with a left ventricular quadripolar lead and the MultiPoint™ pacing feature early activated. QUARTO III.

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in most heart failure patients, up to 40% do not respond to CRT. It has been suggested that multipoint left ventricle pacing (MPP) would increase the response rate. To assess the CRT response rate at 6months in patients implanted with a CRT device with the MPP feature activated early after the implant. This was a multicentre, prospective, open-label and non-randomized study. The primary endpoint was response to biventricular pacing defined as >15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) comparing echocardiography measurements performed at baseline and 6months by a core laboratory. Among secondary endpoints the combined endpoint of mortality or all-cause hospitalizations was evaluated. Primary study endpoint and clinical outcomes were compared to a Quarto II control cohort. Totally, 105 patients were included. The response rate was 64.6% (97.5% lower confidence bound 53%). Mean relative reduction in LVESV was 25.3%, and mean absolute increase in LVEF was 9.4%. The subjects with device programmed using anatomical approach showed a trend towards higher responder rate than those using the electrical approach (72% vs. 61.1%, p= 0.32). Finally, the combined incidence of mortality and or all-cause hospitalizations at 6month was 12.4%. Early activation of MPP was not associated to an advantage increasing echocardiography responders to CRT at 6months of follow-up. Nevertheless, patients programmed using widest pacing cathodes had a numerically higher responder rate. Finally, early activation of MPP was associated to a low incidence of clinical endpoints at 6months of follow-up.

Evaluation of interventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with quadripolar systems in long-term postoperative follow-up

Aim. To assess the association between changes in interventricular delay (IVD) and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) during 24-month postoperative period in patients with quadripolar left ventricular leads.Material and methods. This retrospective non-randomized study included data from 48 patients with implanted CRT devices with quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads, examined 3, 6, 12, 24 months after operation. CRT responders were considered patients with a decrease in end-systolic volume (ESV) by more than 10% compared with preoperative. To test the hypothesis about the rationale for choosing the maximum IVD when installing the LV lead, the group of patients was divided into two subgroups as follows: one with the maximum IVD (IVDmax, n=24), the other — without this condition (n=24).Results. A correlation was found between changes in IVD and ESV, as well as ejection fraction (EF) in the period of 6, 12 and 24 months after implantation compared to baseline. In the subgroup with IVDmax, the shortening of IVD in the postoperative period is higher at each considered period compared to the second subgroup, and in general, there is a more pronounced decrease in IVD over 24 months. At the same time, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery, patients with IVDmax show a significantly greater decrease in ESV and, accordingly, a greater increase in EF. Prognostic models of CRT response in the long term after implantation were created. Significant predictors were the initial IVD, changes in IVD in the early postoperative period and IVDmax selection. At the same time, not a single factor, taken separately, made it possible to separate responders and non-responders.Conclusion. A greater shortening of the IVD corresponds to a greater decrease in LV ESV and EDV, as well as a greater increase in EF in the long-term postoperative period. The choice of quadripolar LV lead in accordance with the maximum IVD is accompanied by a decrease in the proportion of non-responders, a more pronounced decrease in electrical ventricular dyssynchrony and an improvement in systolic function.

Novel multi-site, multi-point biventricular pacing configuration: acute haemodynamic benefit

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Supported by the research grant of the AZV (Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic) Background Biventricular pacing (BVP) using multiple left ventricular (LV) sites may augment the hemodynamic effect of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) by engaging a greater mass of the myocardium. Purpose To evaluate the acute hemodynamic effect of a novel multi-site, multi-point BVP configuration. Methods The study investigated 18 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block during implantation of a BVP device (age: 59 ± 14 years, female gender: 7 [39%], LVEF: 27 ± 6%, native QRS: 171 ± 16 ms). Conventional leads were placed in the right atrium (RA) and ventricle (RV), one quadripolar LV lead (Quartet, Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) was positioned in the posterolateral and another one in lateral or anterolateral coronary vein. Individual bipoles of all leads were connected through a splitter to separate external cardiac stimulators. Hemodynamics was evaluated using a micromanometer-tipped catheter (Micro-Cath, Millar, Tx, USA) located in the LV during RA pacing above sinus rate and five atrio-ventricular sequential pacing configurations at the same rate: 1.) RA+RV, 2.) RA + RV + distal bipole of the LV lead with greater dP/dT („conventional BVP"), 3.) RA + RV + distal and proximal bipoles of the LV lead with greater dP/dT („single-lead multi-point BVP"), 4.) RA + RV + distal bipoles of both LV leads („two-lead multi-site BVP"), and 5.) sequentional pacing RA + RV + all bipoles of both LV leads interconnected to a mesh („maximum BVP"). Results Compared to RA pacing, LV dP/dT was significantly greater during all BVP pacing configurations (RA pacing: 1940 ± 507 mmHg/s vs. conventional BVP: 2431 ± 855 mmHg/s, single-lead multi-point BVP: 2539 ± 740 mmHg/s, two-lead multisite BVP: 2517 ± 836 mmHg/s, and "maximum BVP": 2685 ± 893 mmHg/s, all p&amp;lt;0.001, Figure 1), but not during RA-RV pacing (2014 ± 721 mmHg/s, p=0.12). In addition, dP/dT was significantly greater during "maximum BVP" compared to conventional BVP (p=0.05). Conclusion Compared to RA pacing and conventional BVP, the greatest increase in LV contractility was achieved with a novel multi-site, multi-point "maximum BVP" configuration. These preliminary findings provide a rationale for designing new approaches to CRT.

Acute hemodynamic impact of atrioventricular delay and left ventricular pacing vector programming in MultiPoint Pacing.

The benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients have been shown to depend on device programming, particularly atrioventricular delay (AVD) and left ventricular (LV) pacing site selection. This study compared the hemodynamic AVD optimization for commonly used biventricular (BiV) and MultiPoint Pacing(MPP, Abbott) LV vector selection strategies. After de novo CRT-D (Abbott Quadra Assura MP) and quadripolar LV lead (Abbott Quartet) implant, acute LV pressure was measured across a range of AVDs (60-225 ms) in four pacing modes: BiV with most proximal cathode, BiV with most distal cathode, MPP using two cathodes with earliest and latest right ventricle (RV)-LV activation times, and MPP using two cathodes with maximal anatomical separation. Hemodynamic improvement was evaluated by changes in maximum LV pressure first-derivative versus RV pacing (ΔdP/dt). Twenty patients (64 years old, 68% male) completed the acute pacing protocol at six centers in China. Hemodynamic improvement versus RV pacing for BiV (proximal), BiV (Distal), MPP (electrical), and MPP (anatomical) was 22.1% ± 13.6%, 23.7% ± 13.4%, 24.5% ± 13.4%, and 25.1% ± 13.9%, respectively. The best MPP setting was marginally superior to the best BiV across all patients (25.8% ± 13.4% vs. 24.5% ± 13.1%, p = .040) and in the majority of patients (75.0% vs. 25.0%, p = .004). AVD programmed as little as 20 ms from optimum significantly reduced the ΔdP/dt benefit for all modes. The maximal hemodynamic improvement across AV delays in this population was greater with MPP than BiV. Furthermore, patient-specific AVD programming was critical in achieving the full hemodynamic response for all BiV and MPP modes.

An active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy with reduced postoperative complication rates.

BackgroundThe rate of left ventricular (LV) lead displacement after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains high despite improvements in lead technology. In 2017, a novel quadripolar lead with active fixation technology became available in the UK.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational study analyzing device complications in 476 consecutive patients undergoing successful first‐time implantation of a CRT device at a tertiary center from 2017 to 2020.ResultsBoth active (n = 135) and passive fixation (n = 341) quadripolar leads had similar success rates for implantation (99.3% vs. 98.8%, p = 1.00), although the pacing threshold (0.89 [0.60–1.25] vs. 1.00 [0.70–1.60] V, p = .01) and lead impedance (632 [552–794] vs. 730 [636–862] Ohms, p < .0001) were significantly lower for the active fixation lead. Patients receiving an active fixation lead had a reduced incidence of lead displacement at 6 months (0.74% vs. 4.69%, p = .036). There was no significant difference in the rate of right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV) lead displacement between the two groups (RA: 1.48% vs. 1.17%, p = .68; RV: 2.22% vs. 1.76%, p = .72). Reprogramming the LV lead after displacement was unsuccessful in most cases (successful reprogramming: Active fix = 0/1, Passive fix = 1/16) therefore nearly all patients required a repeat procedure. As a result, the rate of intervention within 6 months for lead displacement was significantly lower when patients were implanted with the active fixation lead (0.74% vs. 4.40%, p = .049).ConclusionThe novel active fixation lead in our study has a lower incidence of lead displacement and re‐intervention compared to conventional quadripolar leads for CRT.

Anodal Capture for Multisite Pacing with a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead: A Feasibility Study.

Background: Up to 40% of patients are CRT non-responders. Multisite pacing, using a unique quadripolar lead, also called multipoint/multipole pacing (MPP), is a potential alternative. We sought to determine the feasibility of intentional anodal capture using a single LV quadripolar lead, to reproduce MPP without the need of a specific algorithm (so-called “pseudo MPP”). Methods: Consecutive patients implanted with a commercially available CRT device and a quadripolar LV lead in our department were prospectively included. The electric charge (Q, in Coulomb) of RV and LV pacing spikes were calculated for all available LV pacing configurations at the threshold. The best MPP was defined as the configuration with the lowest consumption (QRV + Qbest LV1 + Qbest LV2). The best “pseudo MPP” (QRV + QLV1–LV2 with anodal capture) and best BVp (QRV + Qbest LV) were also calculated. A theoretical longevity was estimated for each configuration at the threshold without a safety margin. Results: A total of 235 configurations were tested in 15 consecutive patients. “Pseudo-MPP” was feasible in 80% of patients with 3.1 ± 2.6 vectors available per-patient and LVproximal-LVdistal (most distant electrodes) vectors were available in 47% of patients. Each MPP pacing spike electrical charge was comparable to “pseudo-MPP” (18,428 ± 6863 µC and 20,528 ± 5509 µC, respectively, p = 0.15). Theoretical longevity was 6.2 years for MPP, 5.6 years for “pseudo-MPP” and 13.7 years for BVp. Conclusions: “Pseudo MPP” using intentional anodal capture with a quadripolar left ventricular lead, mimicking conventional multisite pacing, is feasible in most of CRT patients, with comparable energy consumption. Further studies on their potential clinical impact are needed.

Intracardiac conduction time as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: Results of the BIO|SELECT pilot study.

BackgroundQuadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads are capable of sensing and pacing the left ventricle from 4 different electrodes, which may potentially improve patient response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).ObjectiveWe measured 3 different time intervals: right ventricular (RV)-sensed to LV-sensed during intrinsic rhythm (RVs-LVs), RV-paced to LV-sensed (RVp-LVs), and LV-paced to LV-sensed (LVp-LVs, between distal [LV1] and proximal pole on a quadripolar LV lead), and assessed their association with CRT response in terms of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and a composite benefit index (CBI) comprising LVESV, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide level, and NYHA class.MethodsA CRT-defibrillator system with quadripolar LV lead was implanted in 196 patients (mean age 69 years, mean LVEF 30%, left bundle-branch block [LBBB] 58%). Conduction intervals were measured before hospital discharge. At baseline and 7-month follow-up, echocardiographic and other components of CBI were determined.ResultsThe mean RVs-LV1s, RVp-LV1s, and LVp-LVs delays were 68 ± 38 ms, 132 ± 34 ms, and 99 ± 31 ms, respectively. From baseline to 7 months, LVESV decreased by 17.3% ± 28.6%. The RVs-LV1s interval correlated stronger with CBI (R2 = 0.12, P < .00001) than with LVESV change (R2 = 0.05, P = .006). In contrast, RVp-LV1s did not correlate and LVp-LVs correlated only weakly with CRT response. The subgroup of patients (44%) with LBBB and RVs-LV1s above the lower quartile (≥34 ms) showed the greatest response to CRT.ConclusionThe RVs-LVs interval during intrinsic rhythm is relevant for CRT success, whereas RVp-LVs and LVp-LVs intervals did not predict CRT response.

Long-term reverse remodeling and clinical improvement by MultiPoint Pacing in a randomized, international, Middle Eastern heart failure study

PurposeCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing, MPP) has been shown to improve CRT response, although MPP response using automated pacing vector programming has not been demonstrated in the Middle East. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of MPP to conventional biventricular pacing (BiV) using echocardiographic and clinical changes at 6-month post-implant.MethodsThis prospective, randomized study was conducted at 13 Middle Eastern centers. After de novo CRT-D implant (Abbott Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™) with quadripolar LV lead (Abbott Quartet™), patients were randomized to either BiV or MPP therapy. In BiV patients, the LV pacing vector was selected per standard practice; in MPP patients, the two LV pacing vectors were selected automatically using VectSelect. CRT response was defined at 6-month post-implant by a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥ 15%.ResultsOne hundred and forty-two patients (61 years old, 68% male, NYHA class II/III/IV 19%/75%/6%, 33% ischemic, 57% hypertension, 52% diabetes, 158 ms QRS, 25.8% ejection fraction [EF]) were randomized to either BiV (N = 69) or MPP (N = 73). After 6 months, MPP vs. BiV patients experienced greater ESV reduction (25.0% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.08), greater EF improvement (11.9% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.36), significantly greater ESV response rate (68.5% vs. 50.7%, P = 0.04), and significantly greater NYHA class improvement rate (80.8% vs. 60.3%, P = 0.01).ConclusionsWith MPP and automatic LV vector selection, more CRT patients in the Middle East experienced reverse remodeling and clinical improvement relative to conventional BiV pacing.

Determinants of LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration with different fusion strategies in cardiac resynchronisation therapy

BackgroundWe designed this study to assess the acute effects of different fusion strategies and left ventricular (LV) pre-excitation/post-excitation on LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration (QRSd).MethodsWe measured LV dP/dtmax and QRSd...

Effective nonapical left ventricular pacing with quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Current guidelines recommend avoiding apical left ventricular (LV) pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated the feasibility of nonapical pacing with the current quadripolar LV lead technology. We analyzed consecutive patients who received CRT with an LV quadripolar lead. The post--implantation position of each electrode of the LV lead was designated as basal, mid, or apical. The pacing capture threshold (PCT) and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) threshold were assessed for each electrode. We enrolled 168 patients. A total of 8 CRT defibrillators were from Biotronik (with Sentus OTW QP leads), 98 were from Boston Scientific (with 21 Acuity X4 Spiral and 77 Acuity X4 Straight leads), and 62 from St. Jude Medical (with Quartet leads). The median (interquartile range) number of electrodes at nonapical segments per patient was 3 (1-4) with Biotronik Sentus leads, 4 (3-4) with spiral -design Boston Scientific leads, 4 (3-4) with straight Boston Scientific leads, and 3 (3-4) with St. Jude Medical Quartet leads (P = 0.045). Three patients (38%) with Biotronik Sentus leads, 21 (100%) with spiral -design Boston Scientific leads, 69 (90%) with straight -design Boston Scientific leads, and 49 (79%) with St. Jude Medical Quartet leads (P <0.001) had at least 1 electrode located at nonapical segments linked with a PNS -PCT safety margin of more than 2 V. During the 6-month follow -up, PNS was detected in 4 patients and was eliminated with reprogramming. No significant changes in PCT were detected during follow -up. Quadripolar leads allowed nonapical pacing with acceptable electrical parameters in the majority of CRT recipients, although differences were found among the currently available devices.

Six months clinical outcome comparison between quadripolar and bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre observational study.

Background and objectivesQuadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offer multi-vector pacing with different pacing configurations and hence enabling LV pacing at most suitable site with better lead stability. We aim to compare the outcomes between quadripolar and bipolar LV lead in patients receiving CRT.MethodsIn this prospective, non-randomized, single-center observational study, we enrolled 93 patients receiving CRT with bipolar (BiP) (n = 31) and quadripolar (Quad) (n = 62) LV lead between August 2016 to August 2019. Patients were followed for six months, and outcomes were compared with respect to CRT response (defined as ≥5% absolute increase in left ventricle ejection fraction), electrocardiographic, echocardiographic parameters, NYHA functional class improvement, and incidence of LV lead-related complication.ResultsAt the end of six months follow up, CRT with quadripolar lead was associated with better response rate as compared to bipolar pacing (85.48% vs 64.51%; p = 0.03), lesser heart failure (HF) hospitalization events (1.5 vs 2; p = 0.04) and better improvement in HF symptoms (patients with ≥1 NYHA improvement 87.09% vs 67.74%; p = 0.04). There were fewer deaths per 100 patient-year (6.45 vs 9.37; p = 0.04) and more narrowing of QRS duration (Δ12.56 ± 3.11 ms vs Δ7.29 ± 1.87 ms; p = 0.04) with quadripolar lead use. Lead related complications were significantly more with the use of bipolar lead (74.19% vs 41.94%; p = 0.02).ConclusionsOur prospective, non-randomized, single-center observational study reveals that patients receiving CRT with quadripolar leads have a better response to therapy, lesser heart failure hospitalizations, lower all-cause mortality, and fewer lead-related complications, proving its superiority over the bipolar lead.

Clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients randomized to an active fixation bipolar left ventricular lead versus a passive quadripolar lead

Objectives: To compare the clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients receiving a bipolar left ventricular (LV) lead with a side helix for active fixation to the outcome in patients receiving a quadripolar passive fixation LV lead. Design: Sixty-two patients (mean age 72 ± 11 years) were blindly and randomly assigned to the active fixation bipolar lead group (n = 31) or to the quadripolar lead group (n= 31). The LV leads were targeted to the basal LV segment in a vein concordant to the LV segment with the latest mechanical contraction chosen on the basis of preoperative radial strain (RS) echocardiography. Results: At the 6-month follow-up (FU), the reduction in LV end-systolic volume and LV reverse remodelling responder rate, defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction >15%, was 77% in the active fixation group and 83% in the quadripolar group, which was not significantly different. At the 12-month FU, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) did not differ between the groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class or Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score. The occurrence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) was 19% in the active fixation group versus 10% in the quadripolar group (p=.30), and all cases were resolved by reprogramming the device. All patients were alive at the 12-month FU. There was no device infection. Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the active fixation group of patients and the quadripolar group of patients concerning improvement in echocardiographic parameters or clinical symptoms. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04632472

Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar

Objective: To investigate the application and efficacy of left ventricular (LV) electrical delay (LVED) and the distance of right ventricular(RV) pacing polar to LV(DRLV) in optimizing LV pacing polar. Methods: Heart failure (HF) patients who implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device with a LV quadripolar lead from January 2014 to January 2018 at General Hospital of Northern Theater Command were enrolled in the study. Measurements of LVED and DRLV of each polar of the lead were performed in patients with HF who underwent CRT with LV quadripolar lead. The principle in turn for polar selecting used for clinical LV pacing was the pacing polar: (1)without phrenic nerve stimulation(PNS); (2)with appropriate capture threshold; (3)not located in apical; (4)with maximal LVED; (5)with maximal DRLV. The LV pacing polar was selected for CRT according to the procedure. The distribution of target veins implanted with LV quadripolar lead were calculated. The percentage of biventricular pacing at 6-month follow-up was recorded. The following indexes were compared before and 6-month after surgery, including QRS duration, LV end-systolic volume(LVESV), LV ejection fraction(LVEF), LV end-diastolic dimension(LVEDD), 6 minute walking distance(6MWD), New York Heart Association(NYHA) class. The efficacy and echocardiographic efficacy of CRT was evaluated. Results: There were twenty-nine HF patients enrolled. The mean age of enrolled patients was(61.7±7.6)years old, nineteen (66%)of them were male. There were seventeen(59%) patients diagnosed as dilated cardiomyopathy and twelve(41%) patients as ischemic cardiomyopathy. All patients were successfully implanted with LV quadripolar lead into target veins, and all four pacing sites were also in target veins. Target veins were located in lateral veins in 15 patients (52%), anterior veins in 2 patients (7%), posterior veins in 11 patients (38%), and lateral branches of great cardiac veins in 1 patient (3%). After 6-month of follow-up, the percentage of biventricular pacing was greater than 95%.There were nineteen(66%) patients optimized LV pacing polar by the largest LVED and four (14%) patients by the DRLV. Of the 29 patients, 5(17%) patients used D1 as the pacing polar, 5(17%) patients used M2 as the pacing polar, 7(24%) patients used M3 as the pacing polar, and 12(41%) patients used P4 as the pacing polar. The pacing polars (D1, M2) of traditional bipolar lead were used in 10(34%) patients, and the LV quadripolar lead specific pacing polars (M3, P4) were used in 19(66%) patients.Compared to a LV quadripolar lead, the LV pacing polar (M3, P4) selected in 19(66%) patients were not achievable with the traditional LV bipolar lead (D1, M2). Preoperative QRS duration, LVESV, LVEF, LVEDD, 6MWD and NYHA class were (171±24)ms, (231±79)ml, (28±5)%, (74±11)mm, (294±103)m, (3.2±1.0)class and the postoperative 6-month were (130±12)ms, (158±73)ml, (36±10)%, (66±12)mm, (371±86)m, (1.9±0.5)class. These indexes were significantly improved after 6 months operation(P<0.001). 97% and 83% patients were responders of CRT as assessed by 6-month efficacy and echocardiographic efficacy. Conclusion: The maximal LVED and DRLV can be used to select LV pacing polar with a high rate of CRT response rate.

Balloon angioplasty of cardiac vein in a patient treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy

Introduction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and hospitalization in patients with symptomatic heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) on optimal drug therapy. Among all, the reasons for ?non-response? to CRT pacemaker could be the failure to achieve optimal left ventricular (LV) lead position due to severe curve or stenosis/occlusion of the target vein. Case report. We presented a 79-old-male patient, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III, with atrial fibrillation, chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), and prior myocardial infarction. The patient underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and mechanical prosthetic aortic valve implantation. He was indicated for CRT. The patient?s venogram revealed ostial/proximal severe curve and stenosis of the posterolateral vein, the only vein of coronary sinus that led to anatomically optimal LV segment for stimulation. After the balloon angioplasty of the curved and stenotic portion of the target vein with compliant balloon 4.0 ? 30 mm, a satisfactory and stable position of quadripolar LV lead was achieved. Conclusion. Compliant balloon angioplasty could be a safe and efficient way to override severe coronary vein stenosis in some CRT cases.

P1492Comparison of the long-term performance of the quadripolar IS-4 and the bipolar IS-1 left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Abstract BACKGROUND The implantation of left ventricular (LV) leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the management of lead-related complications can be challenging. The introduction of the quadripolar IS-4 LV lead may have facilitated the implantation procedure and may have reduced lead-related complications. Data of long-term follow-up (FU) comparing the IS-4 lead with the IS-1 LV lead are rare and conflicting. PURPOSE Comparison of lead-related complications and all-cause mortality between CRT patients who received an IS-4 or an IS-1 LV lead in the long-term FU. METHODS Adults with an indication for a CRT-Defibrillator or CRT-Pacemaker, a successful endovascular IS-4 or IS-1 LV lead implantation, and a minimal FU of three years were included in this retrospective study. The combined primary endpoint was freedom from lead-related complications defined as (i) occurrence of persisting high pacing threshold (&amp;gt;2.75V/0.4ms), (ii) unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation, (iii) LV lead dislodgement/disruption, (iv) the necessity of re-interventions affecting the LV lead, and (v) LV lead deactivation/explantation. Secondary endpoints were all singular complications and all-cause mortality. RESULTS Eligible for the study were 133 patients (IS-4 n = 66; IS-1 n = 67) with a mean FU of 4.03 ± 1.93 years. Baseline characteristics of both patient groups did not differ significantly. Freedom from lead-related complications was higher in patients with an IS-4 lead as compared to an IS-1 lead (Figure 1; 87.9% vs. 65.7%; p = 0.002). The secondary outcomes showed a higher rate of LV lead dislodgement/disruption (4.5% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.015) in the IS-1 patient group and more patients suffered from unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation with an IS-1 lead (3.0% vs. 13.4%; p = 0.029). LV lead deactivation/explantation during FU and LV lead-related re-interventions were fewer in case of an IS-4 lead (4.5% vs 22.4%; p = 0.003; 6.1% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of persisting high pacing thresholds and all-cause mortality did not differ (4.5% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.492; 22.7% vs 25.4%; p = 0.721, respectively). CONCLUSION The quadripolar IS-4 LV lead showed in this retrospective study a better long-term performance than the bipolar IS-1 lead. Abstract Figure 1

862Syncav with multipoint pacing improves acute left ventricular hemodynamics

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Abbott Introduction SyncAV has been shown to improve electrical synchronization by automatically adjusting atrioventricular delay (AVD) according to the intrinsic atrioventricular conduction time. Additional incremental electrical synchronization may be gained by the addition of second left ventricular (LV) pulse with MultiPoint Pacing (MPP). While the electrical synchronization benefits of SyncAV have been previously explored, there has been no assessment of the acute hemodynamic impact of SyncAV with or without MPP. Objective Evaluate the acute LV hemodynamic impact of SyncAV with and without MPP. Methods Heart failure patients with LBBB and QRS duration (QRSd) &amp;gt; 140 ms undergoing CRT-P/D implant with a quadripolar LV lead were enrolled in this prospective study. A guidewire or catheter with pressure transducer was placed in the LV chamber and the maximum pressure change (dP/dtmax) was recorded during the following pacing modes: intrinsic conduction, conventional biventricular pacing with SyncAV (BiV + SyncAV), and MPP with SyncAV (MPP + SyncAV). Twelve-lead surface ECG was used to determine the patient-tailored SyncAV offset that minimized QRSd. Results Twenty-seven patients (67% male, 44% ischemic, 30 ± 7% ejection fraction) completed the acute recordings. Relative to the intrinsic QRSd of 163 ms, BiV + SyncAV reduced QRSd by 21.5% to 124 ms (p &amp;lt; 0.001 vs. intrinsic) and MPP + SyncAV reduced QRSd by 26.6% to 120 ms (p &amp;lt; 0.05 vs. BiV + SyncAV). Beyond electrical synchronization, SyncAV significantly improved acute hemodynamics. Relative to the intrinsic dP/dtmax of 842 mmHg/s, BiV + SyncAV elevated dP/dtmax by 6.3% to 900 mmHg/s (p &amp;lt; 0.001 vs. intrinsic) and MPP + SyncAV elevated dP/dtmax by 8.8% to 926 mmHg/s (p &amp;lt; 0.005 vs. BiV + SyncAV). Despite both QRSd and dP/dtmax improvement with SyncAV and MPP, correlation between electrical and hemodynamic measurements was poor (R2 = 0.0 for BiV + SyncAV, R2 = 0.1 for MPP + SyncAV). Conclusion SyncAV may significantly improve acute LV hemodynamics in addition to electrical synchrony in LBBB patients. Further incremental improvement was achieved by combining SyncAV with MPP. Abstract Figure.

Performance of a novel active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Attain Stability Quad Clinical Study results.

The Medtronic Attain Stability Quad lead is a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead with an active fixation helix assembly designed to fixate the lead within the coronary sinus and pace nonapical regions of the LV. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of this novel active fixation quadripolar LV lead. Patients with standard indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were enrolled. All patients were followed at 3 and 6 months post-implant and every 6 months thereafter until study closure. Pacing capture thresholds (PCTs) were measured at implant and each follow-up and adverse events (AEs) were recorded upon occurrence. Of the 440 patients who underwent implant procedures, placement of the Attain Stability Quad lead was successful in 426 (96.8%). LV lead-related complications occurred in 10 patients (2.3%), including LV lead dislodgement in three patients (0.7%). The percentage of patients with at least one LV pacing vector with a PCT ≤2.5 V at a 6-month follow-up was 96.3%. The LV lead was successfully fixated to the prespecified pacing location in 97.4% of cases. This large, multinational study of the Attain Stability Quad lead demonstrated a high rate of implant success with a low complication rate. The active fixation mechanism allowed precise placement of the pacing electrodes at the desired target region with good PCTs and a very low dislodgement rate.