Pursuit-related Activity Research Articles

Gaze Pursuit Responses in Nucleus Reticularis Tegmenti Pontis of Head-Unrestrained Macaques

Eye-head gaze pursuit-related activity was recorded in rostral portions of the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (rNRTP) in alert macaques. The head was unrestrained in the horizontal plane, and macaques were trained to pursue a moving target either with their head, with the eyes stationary in the orbits, or with their eyes, with their head voluntarily held stationary in space. Head-pursuit-related modulations in rNRTP activity were observed with some cells exhibiting increases in firing rate with increases in head-pursuit frequency. For many units, this head-pursuit response appeared to saturate at higher frequencies (>0.6 Hz). The response phase re:peak head-pursuit velocity formed a continuum, containing cells that could encode head-pursuit velocity and those encoding head-pursuit acceleration. The latter cells did not exhibit head position-related activity. Sensitivities were calculated with respect to peak head-pursuit velocity and averaged 1.8 spikes/s/deg/s. Of the cells that were tested for both head- and eye-pursuit-related activity, 86% exhibited responses to both head- and eye-pursuit and therefore carried a putative gaze-pursuit signal. For these gaze-pursuit units, the ratio of head to eye response sensitivities averaged approximately 1.4. Pursuit eccentricity seemed to affect head-pursuit response amplitude even in the absence of a head position response per se. The results indicated that rNRTP is a strong candidate for the source of an active head-pursuit signal that projects to the cerebellum, specifically to the target-velocity and gaze-velocity Purkinje cells that have been observed in vermal lobules VI and VII.

The role of areas MT and MST in coding of visual motion underlying the execution of smooth pursuit

What is the main purpose of visual motion processing? One very important aspect of motion processing is definitively the generation of smooth pursuit eye movements. These eye movements avoid motion blur of moving objects which would obstruct the analysis of the objects’ visual details. However, these eye movements can only be executed if there is a moving target. So there is a very close and inseparable relationship between smooth pursuit and motion processing. The hub for visual motion processing is situated in the middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) area. Despite the undoubted importance of these areas for the generation of smooth pursuit or goal-directed behavior in general, it is important to keep in mind that motion processing in addition serves perceptual purposes such as object recognition, structure-from-motion detection, scene segmentation, self-motion estimation and depth perception. This review focuses at the beginning on pursuit-related activity recorded from MT and MST, subsequently extends the view to goal-directed hand movements, and finally addresses the possible contributions of these areas to motion perception.

Specific motion processing pathway deficit during eye tracking in schizophrenia: A performance-matched functional magnetic resonance imaging study

The neural mechanisms underlying smooth pursuit eye movement (SPEM) abnormalities in schizophrenia are not well understood. Previous evidence suggests that a deficit in the processing of internal representations of object motion (extraretinal motion) contributes to SPEM deficits in patients. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation was compared between patients and control subjects to determine whether schizophrenia patients exhibit abnormal cerebral activation in regions associated with extraretinal motion processing during SPEM. Patients and control subjects were selected based on matched performance in the closed-loop gain. Despite similar performance on closed-loop pursuit gain, patients showed consistent deficits in extraretinal motion based on predictive pursuit. In the magnet, subjects were tested using a traditional smooth-pursuit task that elicits closed-loop response. Patients had reduced pursuit-related activation in several known extraretinal motion processing areas including frontal and supplemental eye fields, medial superior temporal cortex, and anterior cingulate. Patients also showed increased activation in medial occipitotemporal cortex. These results provide functional anatomic evidence supporting reduced function in the extraretinal motion processing pathway in schizophrenia. Increased activation in medial occipitotemporal cortex suggests an increased dependence on immediate retinal motion information, which may be used to compensate for reduced extraretinal signaling during sustained visual tracking.

Extraretinal Inputs to Neurons in the Rostral Superior Colliculus of the Monkey During Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements

The intermediate and deep layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC) are known to be important for the generation of saccadic eye movements. Recent studies have also provided evidence that the rostral SC might be involved in the control of pursuit eye movements. However, because rostral SC neurons respond to visual stimuli used to guide pursuit, it is also possible that the pursuit-related activity is simply a visual response. To test this possibility, we recorded the activity of neurons in the rostral SC as monkeys smoothly pursued a target that was briefly extinguished. We found that almost all rostral SC neurons in our sample maintained their pursuit-related activity during a brief visual blink, which was similar to the maintained activity they also exhibited during blinks imposed during fixation. These results indicate that discharge of rostral SC neurons during pursuit is not simply a visual response, but includes extraretinal signals.

Discharge properties of neurons in the rostral superior colliculus of the monkey during smooth-pursuit eye movements.

The intermediate and deep layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC) comprise a retinotopically organized map for eye movements. The rostral end of this map, corresponding to the representation of the fovea, contains neurons that have been referred to as "fixation cells" because they discharge tonically during active fixation and pause during the generation of most saccades. These neurons also possess movement fields and are most active for targets close to the fixation point. Because the parafoveal locations encoded by these neurons are also important for guiding pursuit eye movements, we studied these neurons in two monkeys as they generated smooth pursuit. We found that fixation cells exhibit the same directional preferences during pursuit as during small saccades-they increase their discharge during movements toward the contralateral side and decrease their discharge during movements toward the ipsilateral side. This pursuit-related activity could be observed during saccade-free pursuit and was not predictive of small saccades that often accompanied pursuit. When we plotted the discharge rate from individual neurons during pursuit as a function of the position error associated with the moving target, we found tuning curves with peaks within a few degrees contralateral of the fovea. We compared these pursuit-related tuning curves from each neuron to the tuning curves for a saccade task from which we separately measured the visual, delay, and peri-saccadic activity. We found the highest and most consistent correlation with the delay activity recorded while the monkey viewed parafoveal stimuli during fixation. The directional preferences exhibited during pursuit can therefore be attributed to the tuning of these neurons for contralateral locations near the fovea. These results support the idea that fixation cells are the rostral extension of the buildup neurons found in the more caudal colliculus and that their activity conveys information about the size of the mismatch between a parafoveal stimulus and the currently foveated location. Because the generation of pursuit requires a break from fixation, the pursuit-related activity indicates that these neurons are not strictly involved with maintaining fixation. Conversely, because activity during the delay period was found for many neurons even when no eye movement was made, these neurons are also not obligatorily related to the generation of a movement. Thus the tonic activity of these rostral neurons provides a potential position-error signal rather than a motor command-a principle that may be applicable to buildup neurons elsewhere in the SC.

Neuronal Responses Related to Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in the Periarcuate Cortical Area of Monkeys

To examine how the periarcuate area is involved in the control of smooth pursuit eye movements, we recorded 177 single neurons while monkeys pursued a moving target in the dark. The majority (52%, 92/177) of task-related neurons responded to pursuit but had little or no response to saccades. Histological reconstructions showed that these neurons were located mainly in the posterior bank of the arcuate sulcus near the sulcal spur. Twenty-seven percent (48/177) changed their activity at the onset of saccades. Of these, 36 (75%) showed presaccadic burst activity with strong preference for contraversive saccades. Eighteen (10%, 18/177) were classified as eye-position-related neurons, and 11% (19/177) were related to other aspects of the stimuli or response. Among the 92 neurons that responded to pursuit, 85 (92%) were strongly directional with uniformly distributed preferred directions. Further analyses were performed in these directionally sensitive pursuit-related neurons. For 59 neurons that showed distinct changes in activity around the initiation of pursuit, the median latency from target motion was 96 ms and that preceding pursuit was -12 ms, indicating that these neuron can influence the initiation of pursuit. We tested some neurons by briefly extinguishing the tracking target (n = 39) or controlling its movement with the eye position signal (n = 24). The distribution of the change in pursuit-related activity was similar to previous data for the dorsomedial part of the medial superior temporal neurons (, indicating that pursuit-related neurons in the periarcuate area also carry extraretinal signals. For 22 neurons, we examined the responses when the animals reversed pursuit direction to distinguish the effects of eye acceleration in the preferred direction from oppositely directed eye velocity. Almost all neurons discharged before eye velocity reached zero, however, only nine neurons discharged before the eyes were accelerated in the preferred direction. The delay in neuronal responses relative to the onset of eye acceleration in these trials might be caused by suppression from oppositely directed pursuit velocity. The results suggest that the periarcuate neurons do not participate in the earliest stage of eye acceleration during the change in pursuit direction, although most of them may participate in the early stages of pursuit initiation in the ordinary step-ramp pursuit trials. Some neurons changed their activity when the animals fixated a stationary target, and this activity could be distinguished easily from the strong pursuit-related responses. Our results suggest that the periarcuate pursuit area carries extraretinal signals and affects the premotor circuitry for smooth pursuit.

Dissociation of saccade-related and pursuit-related activation in human frontal eye fields as revealed by fMRI.

The location of the human frontal eye fields (FEFs) underlying horizontal visually guided saccadic and pursuit eye movements was investigated with the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in five healthy humans. Execution of both saccadic and pursuit eye movements induced bilateral FEF activation located medially at the junction of the precentral sulcus and the superior frontal sulcus and extending laterally to the precentral gyrus. These findings extend previous functional imaging studies by providing the first functional imaging evidence of a specific activation in the FEF during smooth pursuit eye movements in healthy humans. FEF activation during smooth pursuit performance was smaller than during saccades. This finding, which may reflect the presence of a smaller pursuit-related region area in human FEF than the saccade-related region, is consistent with their relative size observed in the monkey. The mean location of the pursuit-related FEF was more inferior and lateral than the location of the saccade-related FEF. These results provide the first evidence that there are different subregions in the human FEF that are involved in the execution of two different types of eye movements, namely saccadic and pursuit eye movements. Moreover, this study provides additional evidence that the human FEF is located in Brodmann's area 6, unlike the monkey FEF which is located in the posterior part of Brodmann's area 8.

Eye position effects in monkey cortex. I. Visual and pursuit-related activity in extrastriate areas MT and MST.

We studied the effect of eye position on visual and pursuit-related activity in neurons in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. Altogether, 109 neurons from the middle temporal area (area MT) and the medial superior temporal area (area MST) were tested for influence of eye position on their stimulus-driven response in a fixation paradigm. In this paradigm the monitored eye position signal was superimposed onto the stimulus control signal while the monkey fixated at different locations on a screen. This setup guaranteed that an optimized stimulus was moved across the receptive field at the same retinal location for all fixation locations. For 61% of the MT neurons and 82% of the MST neurons the stimulus-induced response was modulated by the position of the eyes in the orbit. Directional selectivity was not influenced by eye position. One hundred sixty-eight neurons exhibited direction-specific responses during smooth tracking eye movements and were tested in a pursuit paradigm. Here the monkey had to track a target that started to move in the preferred direction with constant speed from five different locations on the screen in random order. Pursuit-related activity was modulated by eye position in 78% of the MT neurons as well as in 80% of the MST neurons tested. Neuronal activity varied linearly as a function of both horizontal and vertical eye position for most of the neurons tested in both areas, i.e., two-dimensional regression planes could be approximated to the responses of most of the neurons. The directions of the gradients of these regression planes correlated neither with the preferred stimulus direction tested in the fixation paradigm nor with the preferred tracking direction in the pursuit paradigm. Eighty-six neurons were tested with both the fixation and the pursuit paradigms. The directions of the gradients of the regression planes fit to the responses in both paradigms tended to correlate with each other, i.e., for more than two thirds of the neurons the angular difference between both directions was less than +/-90 degrees. The modulatory effect of the position of the eyes in the orbit proved to balance out at the population level for neurons in areas MT and MST, tested with the fixation as well as the pursuit paradigm. Results are discussed in light of the hypothesis of an ongoing coordinate transformation of the incoming sensory signals into a nonretinocentric representation of the visual field.

Eye position effects in monkey cortex. II. Pursuit- and fixation-related activity in posterior parietal areas LIP and 7A.

We studied the effect of eye position on pursuit-related discharges and activity during fixation in darkness for neurons of monkey visual cortical areas (lateral intraparietal area) LIP and 7A. In a first step, neurons were tested for direction-specific activity related to pursuit eye movements while the monkey tracked a moving target. In consecutive trials the pursuit target moved in random order in one of four directions on a translucent screen. For 39% of the neurons, located mostly in a dorsoposterior region of area LIP, as well as 42% of the neurons tested in area 7A, a direction-specific pursuit-related activity could be found. To test whether responsiveness of these neurons was modulated by eye position, we employed a pursuit paradigm. In this paradigm, the monkey had to track a target that started to move in the preferred direction with constant speed from five different locations on the screen in random order. For the majority of cells in both areas, pursuit-related activity was modulated by eye position. Most of the neurons tested also revealed an influence of eye position on their spontaneous activity during fixation in darkness (fixation paradigm). For the majority of cells (> 50%) recorded in both areas, two-dimensional regression planes could be approximated significantly (P < 0.05) or nearly significantly (P < 0.1) to the neuronal discharges observed on the fixation paradigm and pursuit paradigm. For 79% of the LIP neurons and 83% of the 7A neurons tested in both experimental paradigms, the directions of the gradients of the regression planes pointed into the same hemifield, suggesting a common neuronal mechanism mediating the eye position effect regardless of the behavioral task the monkey was performing. The observed effects very much resemble the effects of eye position on light-sensitive and saccade-related responses already described for areas LIP and 7A. Regarding also our results observed for the middle temporal and medial superior temporal areas, it is suggested that the observed modulatory effect of eye position on neuronal activity is a common phenomenon in the macaque visual cortical system subserving an internal representation of the external space in a nonretinocentric frame of reference.

Responses of Visual-Tracking Neurons from Cortical Area MST-I to Visual, Eye and Head Motion.

Thirty-one neurons which exhibited ocular pursuit-related activity [visual-tracking (VT) neurons] were found clustered within area MST-I (the lateral part of area MST) of two rhesus monkeys. Their responses were studied to determine whether this activity was correlated only with pursuit eye movement or with head movement as well. The latter hypothesis appeared to be preferable since visual, eye movement and head movement inputs were found to be mapped in register onto most of these cells. First, in each cell tested (n=19) the pursuit response persisted even in the absence of retinal image motion, offering clear evidence for non-visual input. Second, 22 of the 31 cells were directionally responsive to moving visual stimuli and in 20 of these the preferred directions for the visual motion and pursuit responses agreed closely. Responses were also obtained from many of the same cells during suppression of both the horizontal and the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). In each case, where directional visual, pursuit and VOR suppression responses were each obtained, vector addition of responses during suppression of the horizontal and vertical VOR resulted in an estimated preferred direction for head rotation which was closely aligned with the preferred direction previously obtained for eye motion or visual motion. In addition, the preferred direction of head movement was conserved even when the VOR was elicited by passive head rotation in complete darkness, although the responses in this instance were, on average, only 62% of those obtained during VOR suppression. Our interpretation is that, at present, MST-I VT neurons are best described as encoding the direction of target motion in space-centred coordinates by integrating inputs reflecting retinal image motion plus eye and head movement.