Pure-tone Average Hearing Loss Research Articles

Is endolymphatic sac surgery an efficient treatment of Menière's disease patients? A systematic literature search and meta-analysis

PurposeThe purpose of this work is to assess the treatment efficiency of endolymphatic sac surgery in patients with Menière's disease.MethodsThis study provides a systematic literature review and meta-analysis based on the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. The main inclusion criteria of the literature review were the classification categories according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines of 1985 and 1995.ResultsAn effect of 9.25 dB postoperative weighted average hearing loss in surgically treated individuals is classified as "clinically not significant" according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 85/95. In contrast, the deterioration by 26.23% in speech comprehension is considered as "clinically significant." An improvement of functional level scale assessment by two categories and vertigo control by assessment in category B can be observed.ConclusionThe findings of this meta-analysis indicate that endolymphatic sac surgery may be beneficial as a treatment for Menière's disease in terms of a positive impact on functional level scale and vertigo control while yielding a negative impact on pure tone average hearing loss and on speech comprehension.

Predicting Aided Outcome With Aided Word Recognition Scores Measured With Linear Amplification at Above-conversational Levels.

Many hearing aid (HA) users receive limited benefit from amplification, especially when trying to understand speech in noise, and they often report hearing-related residual activity limitations. Current HA fitting strategies are typically based on pure-tone hearing thresholds only, even though suprathreshold factors have been linked to aided outcomes. Furthermore, clinical measures of speech perception such as word recognition scores (WRSs) are performed without frequency-specific amplification, likely resulting in suboptimal speech audibility and thus inaccurate estimates of suprathreshold hearing abilities. Corresponding measures with frequency-specific amplification ("aided") would likely improve such estimates and enable more accurate aided outcome prediction. Here, we investigated potential links between either unaided WRSs or aided WRSs measured at several above-conversational levels and two established HA outcome measures: The Hearing-In-Noise Test (HINT) and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Thirty-seven older individuals with bilateral hearing impairments participated. Two conditions were tested: unaided and aided, with all stimuli presented over headphones. In the unaided condition, the most comfortable level (MCL) for the presented speech stimuli, WRS at MCL+10 dB as well as uncomfortable levels (UCLs) for narrowband noise stimuli were measured. In the aided condition, all stimuli were individually amplified according to the "National Acoustic Laboratories-Revised, Profound" fitting rule. Aided WRSs were then measured using an Interacoustics Affinity system at three above-conversational levels, allowing for the maximum aided WRS as well as the presence of "rollover" in the performance-intensity function to be estimated. Multivariate data analyses were performed to examine the relations between the HINT (measured using a simulated HA with the NAL-RP amplification) or IOI-HA scores (for the participants' own HAs) and various potential predictors (age, pure-tone average hearing loss, unaided WRS, aided WRS, rollover presence [ROp], and UCL). Aided WRSs predicted the HINT scores better than any other predictor and were also the only significant predictor of the IOI-HA scores. In addition, UCL and ROp in the aided WRSs were significant predictors of the HINT scores and competed for variance in the statistical models. Neither age nor pure-tone average hearing loss could predict the two aided outcomes. Aided WRSs can predict HA outcome more effectively than unaided WRSs, age or pure-tone audiometry and could be relatively easily implemented in clinical settings. More research is necessary to better understand the relations between ROp, UCL and speech recognition at above-conversational levels.

Multidimensional Risk Factors of Age-Related Hearing Loss Among Malaysian Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

PurposeThis study evaluates the prevalence of and the multidimensional risk factors associated with age-related hearing loss (ARHL) among community-dwelling older adults in Malaysia.Patients and MethodsA total of 253 participants aged 60 years and above participated in this cross-sectional study. The participants were subjected to pure tone audiometric assessment. The hearing threshold was calculated for the better ear and classified into pure-tone average (PTA) for the octave frequencies from 0.5 to 4 kHz and high-frequency pure-tone average (HFA) for the octave from 2 to 8kHz. Then, the risk factors associated with PTA hearing loss (HL) and HFAHL were identified by using multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe prevalence of ARHL based on PTA and HFA among the community-dwelling older adults was 75.5% and 83.0%, respectively. Following multifactorial adjustments, being older (OR: 1.239; 95% CI: 1.062–1.445), having higher waist circumference (OR: 1.158; 95% CI: 1.015–1.322), lower intake of niacin (OR: 0.909; 95% CI: 0.831–0.988) and potassium (OR: 0.998; 95% CI: 0.996–1.000), and scoring lower in RAVLT T5 (OR: 0.905; 95% CI: 0.838–0.978) were identified as the risk factors of PTAHL. Meanwhile, being older (OR: 1.117; 95% CI: 1.003–1.244), higher intake of carbohydrate (OR: 1.018; 95% CI: 1.006–1.030), lower intake of potassium (OR: 0.998; 95% CI: 0.997–0.999), and lower scores on the RAVLT T5 (OR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.874–0.973) were associated with increased risk of having HFAHL.ConclusionIncreasing age, having higher waist circumference, lower intake of niacin and potassium, higher intake of carbohydrates and having lower RAVLT T5 score were associated with increased risk of ARHL. Modifying these risk factors may be beneficial in preventive and management strategies of ARHL among older persons.

Correlation between degree of hearing loss and intraoperative findings in tubotympanic type of chronic suppurative otitis media

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The aim of tympanoplasty done for tubotympanic type of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) should not only be to achieve a dry ear, but also to give hearing improvement to the patient. Aim of this study was to determine the correlation between size and site of tympanic membrane perforation with degree of hearing loss and correlation between ossicular chain status and degree of hearing loss on pure tone audiometry.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Patients with tubotympanic CSOM with hearing loss upto 60 dBHL undergoing tympanoplasty were examined to know the site and size of tympanic membrane(TM) perforation. Intraoperative findings pertaining to middle ear and ossicles were noted. </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Out of 52 patients of tubotympanic type of CSOM, hearing loss was least (31.18±7.46 dBHL) in small perforations of the TM and highest in subtotal perforations (48.74±7.83 dBHL) which was statistically significant. Hearing loss was significantly more in posterior perforation (46.61±7.02 dBHL) than in anterior perforation of TM (32.65±8.77 dBHL).<strong> </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in pure tone average hearing loss between intact ossicle group (32.87±9.77 dBHL)<strong> </strong>and eroded ossicle group (43.39±9.60dBHL). Difference in air bone gap was also significant between intact ossicle group (24.09±9.56 dB) and eroded ossicle group (31.02±9.83 dB). Multiple ossicles were eroded in nineteen patients with incus being the most commonly eroded ossicle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In this study, hearing loss increased with increased size of TM perforation and also with posterior perforation. Incus was found to be the most commonly eroded ossicle. Multiple ossicles were seen eroded most commonly when hearing loss was moderate. The surgeon will be better equipped to do ossiculoplasty in view of these preoperative findings and also to counsel the patient better about their expectation of hearing improvement following surgery. </p>

Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality.

Knowledge of how executive functions relate to preferred hearing aid (HA) processing is sparse and seemingly inconsistent with related knowledge for speech recognition outcomes. This study thus aimed to find out if (1) performance on a measure of reading span (RS) is related to preferred binaural noise reduction (NR) strength, (2) similar relations exist for two different, non-verbal measures of executive function, (3) pure-tone average hearing loss (PTA), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and microphone directionality (DIR) also influence preferred NR strength, and (4) preference and speech recognition outcomes are similar. Sixty elderly HA users took part. Six HA conditions consisting of omnidirectional or cardioid microphones followed by inactive, moderate, or strong binaural NR as well as linear amplification were tested. Outcome was assessed at fixed SNRs using headphone simulations of a frontal target talker in a busy cafeteria. Analyses showed positive effects of active NR and DIR on preference, and negative and positive effects of, respectively, strong NR and DIR on speech recognition. Also, while moderate NR was the most preferred NR setting overall, preference for strong NR increased with SNR. No relation between RS and preference was found. However, larger PTA was related to weaker preference for inactive NR and stronger preference for strong NR for both microphone modes. Equivalent (but weaker) relations between worse performance on one non-verbal measure of executive function and the HA conditions without DIR were found. For speech recognition, there were relations between HA condition, PTA, and RS, but their pattern differed from that for preference. Altogether, these results indicate that, while moderate NR works well in general, a notable proportion of HA users prefer stronger NR. Furthermore, PTA and executive functions can account for some of the variability in preference for, and speech recognition with, different binaural NR and DIR settings.

Effectiveness of Systemic High-Dose Dexamethasone Therapy for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of systemic high-dose dexamethasone therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in comparison to the previous treatment regimen at our clinic with systemic prednisone 100 mg daily for 7 days analyzed in a previous study. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of an electronic patient data base of 79 patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The standard treatment was orally applied dexamethasone (1st to 3rd day: 40 mg daily, 4th to 6th day: 10 mg daily) in an ambulant setting. The primary endpoint was change in hearing threshold from the initial audiogram to an audiogram at least 4 weeks later. Factors that were analyzed included patient's age, interval between onset of symptoms and start of treatment, presence or absence of dizziness and tinnitus, the audiogram pattern, severity of hearing loss and hearing in the opposite ear. Hearing gain was expressed either as absolute or relative hearing gain. Functionally relevant recovery of hearing was defined as the final pure-tone average (PTA) of 30 dB or less (or the same as the PTA of the opposite ear ± 10 dB). Furthermore, we calculated the percentage of patients with complete, partial and no recovery as defined in the recently published Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. We then compared our results with the previous treatment regimen carried out at our clinic. Results: The average initial PTA hearing loss in the affected ear compared to baseline PTA of the unaffected ear was 51.5 ± 20.9 dB (mean ± SD). The mean absolute hearing gain was 44.4 ± 18.1 dB. The mean relative hearing gain was 86 ± 19%. Of the total, 87% had functionally relevant recovery of hearing. All of our patients showed partial (24%) or complete recovery (76%). No difference in recovery rate could be detected between patients with start of therapy within 24 h and patients with beginning of therapy within 7 days. We found a correlation between the severity of hearing loss and functionally relevant recovery. A mild hearing loss was noted in 34% of patients, with an average relative hearing gain of 89% and a functionally relevant recovery in 96% of them; the 9% of patients with initial deafness showed a mean relative hearing gain of 69% and a functionally relevant recovery in 43%. The audiogram pattern with low- or high-frequency hearing loss showed the best recovery rate; the poorest recovery rate was found in patients with initial deafness. Con-clusion: Application of high-dose orally applied dexamethasone seems to improve the recovery outcomes in comparison to prednisone 100 mg p.o. for 7 days.

Effects of Expansion Algorithms on Speech Reception Thresholds

Expansion is commonly used to reduce microphone noise and low-level environmental noises that can be annoying to hearing aid users. It may also improve or reduce the perception of low-level speech. This study assessed the impact of two expansion algorithms, single and multiple channel, on speech reception thresholds (SRT) with 10 hearing impaired listeners wearing hearing aids with ADRO processing. The single-channel algorithm suppressed sounds below 45 dB A, while the multiple-channel algorithm suppressed sounds below the long-term average spectrum of speech at either 55 or 45 dB SPL. The mean HINT SRTs in quiet were 39.4, 40.7, 40.6, and 41.8 dB A without expansion, with single-channel expansion, and with multiple-channel expansion at expansion thresholds of 45 and 55 dB SPL, respectively. The difference in mean SRT was only statistically significant between no expansion and multiple-channel expansion at a 55 dB SPL threshold. A regression analysis between the change in individual SRT for each expansion condition and pure tone average hearing loss showed no correlation. Our calculations indicate that only those with exceptionally good hearing will find microphone noise audible. The current practice of prescribing expansion algorithms based on hearing thresholds alone is questioned, and other rationales are discussed.

Changing characteristics of first-time hearing aid applicants in The Netherlands in the past decade

This study assessed changes in the characteristics of firsttime hearing aid applicants in the past decade. Age, gender, date, type and ear of first hearing aid and audiometry were determined for a sample of 705 firsttime hearing aid applicants. Thirteen cohorts resulted, according to the year of first visit to the dispenser. Differences in age, hearing loss, gender and type and ear of first hearing aid between cohorts were analysed. The mean age of first-time hearing aid users increased from 59.52 years in 1987 to 71.84 years in 1999. The mean pure-tone average hearing loss in the better ear (1, 2 and 4 kHz) decreased from 69.06 dB in 1987 to 51.86 dB in 1999. Relatively more males than females were fitted with hearing aids. Our conclusions are that people are being fitted with hearing aids at older ages and with smaller degrees of hearing loss.

Expectations About Hearing Aids and Their Relationship to Fitting Outcome

Clinicians are often concerned that unrealistic prefitting expectations can have a negative impact on fitting success for new, hearing aid wearers. To investigate this concern and to explore the potential value of measuring expectations, we developed the Expected Consequences of Hearing aid Ownership (ECHO) questionnaire as a companion to the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire. Four experiments were conducted to (1) determine realistic expectations for hearing aids, (2) evaluate expectations of new users, (3) measure reliability of prefitting expectations, and (4) assess relationships between prefitting expectations and postfitting satisfaction. Novice hearing aid users were found to have stable prefitting expectations about hearing aids, and these expectations were unrealistically high for the typical individual. There were many different expectation patterns across subjects. Of the four subscales of the ECHO, only one was predictive of the corresponding satisfaction data. Potential clinical applications are described.

Audiometric profile in presbycusis

A group of 40 elderly subjects were evaluated using a variety of audiological tests. Their mean age was 68 years. They had all come to the clinic because of hearing problems. The subjects were selected for this study because no cause of their hearing loss could be found other than presbycusis. They all had the typical moderately sloping pure tone audiogram configuration. The pure tone average hearing loss (PTA, average of 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz) ranged from 11 to 70 dBHL with a median of 40. The average air-bone gap was 3 dB. In addition to pure tone audiometry the following tests were performed: most comfortable loudness level and uncomfortable loudness level for pure tone; stapedius reflex thresholds; speech recognition threshold and maximum speech recognition score in quiet; distorted speech recognition; detection thresholds for frequency and intensity glides of a pure tone; slow evoked cortical potentials in response to frequency and intensity glides of a pure tone. The test results, when compared with those obtained on young subjects with normal hearing and with cochlear lesions, show a mixture of characteristics typical of cochlear, retrocochlear and central lesions.