You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Incontinence Therapy I1 Apr 2014MP33-07 SUCCESS OF AUTOLOGOUS PUBOVAGINAL SLING FOLLOWING FAILED MIDURETHRAL SLING Jaclyn Milose, Chang He, John Stoffel, Quentin Clemens, and Anne Pelletier Cameron Jaclyn MiloseJaclyn Milose More articles by this author , Chang HeChang He More articles by this author , John StoffelJohn Stoffel More articles by this author , Quentin ClemensQuentin Clemens More articles by this author , and Anne Pelletier CameronAnne Pelletier Cameron More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.958AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES There is no consensus on the management of stress incontinence status post failed synthetic midurethral sling. It has generally been our practice to perform autologous pubovaginal slings (APVS) however little empirical work has been performed to assess the efficacy. METHODS 108 patients underwent APVS with rectus fascia following one or more failed synthetic midurethral sling from 2000 to 2012. Mean follow up of 14.3 months. RESULTS Mean age for the patient population was 55.7 years. 46 of our 108 patients (42%) had a prior retropubic synthetic sling, 45 (41.7%) had prior transobturator sling, 5 (4.6%) had prior bone anchored sling, 5 (4.6%) had prior unspecified midurethral sling and 4 (3.7%) had prior minisling. 85 patients (78.7%) had only 1 incontinence procedure prior to APVS while 15 (13.9%) had 2, 7 (6.5%) had 3, and 1 (0.9%) patient had 4 prior procedures. 35 (32.4%) of the patients required mesh removal prior to their APVS while 26 (24.1%) had mesh removed simultaneously with APVS. Primary indication for mesh removal included vaginal exposure in 31.7%, pain in 26.8%, retention in 22.0% and urethral erosion or fistula in 15.5%. Preoperative diagnosis was pure stress incontinence (SUI) in 32 patients (29.6%), mixed incontinence in 64 (59.3%), and complex stress incontinence with urethral diverticulum or urethrovaginal fistula/urethral mesh erosion in 12 (11.1%). In the subgroup with Michigan-Incontinence Symptom Index scores (n=66) stress subdomain scores improved from 9.8 pre-op to 3.4 post op (p=0.045). Urgency incontinence (UI) subdomain improved from 8.6 pre-op to 5.5 post op (p=0.017). 93.8% had improvements of their SUI defined as a reduction of 2 points or more on the stress subdomain with 57.6% having cure of their SUI. 62.5% had improvements of their UI defined by a reduction of 2 points. Of our entire patient population 43 (39.8%) had cure with no incontinence, 20 (18.5%) had significantly improved SUI, 32 (29.6%) had cure of their SUI but persistent urge incontinence, 6 (5.5%) patients had no improvement, and 7 (6.5%) de novo urge incontinence. The rate of retention following APVS was 12% (13/108) with 4 patients requiring urethrolysis. On univariate analysis patients with a mesh excision did not have worse outcomes than patients with mesh not removed. Patients with pure SUI were significantly more likely to be cured (56.3%) than those women with pre-operative mixed or complex incontinence (32.9% p=0.032) CONCLUSIONS In this complex population APVS is very effective in the management of SUI following failure of a synthetic midurethral sling. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e340 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Jaclyn Milose More articles by this author Chang He More articles by this author John Stoffel More articles by this author Quentin Clemens More articles by this author Anne Pelletier Cameron More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract