ANY criticisms have been made upon school music, and we have tried to place the blame on outside interests instead of asking ourselves, as music teachers, whether or not we are to blame. The growth of school music has been rapid-too rapid in fact; and when growth is too rapid there is always apt to be a relapse. This has tended to produce a poor type of teacher. The demand for music teachers has been so great some who were poorly prepared often secured employment. Usually the teachers are trained musically, but are unable to associate music with education. Also, when untrained and unprofessional people are at the helm, a poorly organized curriculum often results. Poor systems of this and doing that have developed. Some demand every student hold his book just so on the desk, and the first finger of the right hand be used to tap the time; must be held just so. In other words, many of our people have merely developed tricks in methodology. Some of the music has been curtailed under pretense of cutting expense, and music is believed by some boards to be a frill. The expense, in the instrumental field, has been high due to the pupil cost and equipment. Instrumental music benefits relatively few students in the school. However, as a purely personal observation, it seems often when teachers are dismissed, a school board, endeavoring to reduce expenses, will look about and decide what teacher must go. Then they look for the weakest teacher in the school, teaching the newest subject in the curriculum, and dismiss teacher. I have failed to find the high type of music teacher who is producing good results dismissed from his or her position. If there are such cases, they are very rare.
Read full abstract