Pump Inhibitor Usage Research Articles

A211 INCREASED RATES OF PPI DEPRESCRIPTION OVER TIME IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GI BLEEDS

Abstract Background Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used for various indications, including prophylaxis of upper GI bleeding. We aimed to assess if there has been more PPI deprescription in recent years in patients treated for Upper GI Bleeds (UGIB). Aims Our study aimed to assess the frequency of PPI deprescription in patients treated with endoscopic therapy for UGIBs. We hypothesized that there was a higher rate of PPI deprescription in recent years. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who received endoscopic treatment for UGIB between the years 2015-2022. All patients who were treated with endoscopic therapy for an UGIB from two academic GI practices were included. PPI deprescription was defined as a 50% dose reduction, frequency reduction or complete medication discontinuation in the past 3 months or longer in established PPI users. To assess trends, the cohort was divided into group 1 (2015-2018) and group 2 (2019-2022). Data were analysed using SPSS and chi-squared testing was used to compare categorical variables. Results Data were collected from 301 UGIB treated endoscopically. The mean age was 66.4 ± 13.5 years with 64% males and 36% females. Patients from group 1 had a deprescription rate of 2% (2/101 cases). Patients from group 2 (2019-2022) had a deprescription rate of 16% (32/200 cases) (pampersand:003C0.001). Conclusions There was a higher rate of PPI deprescription in patients treated for UGIB in the second time period. Reasons for the increased rate of PPI deprescription require further investigation. Chi-Squared of PPI Deprescription for entire cohort Fisher Exact test: P value ampersand:003C0.001 Funding Agencies None

Impact of proton pump inhibitor on quality of anticoagulant control and outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients treated with an oral anticoagulant in the COOL-AF registry

Abstract Introduction Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is commonly prescribed in patients treated with antithrombotic therapy, assuming it will reduce bleeding risk irrespective of the risk of bleeding. Although PPI may reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in those treated with an oral anticoagulant, PPI may increase INR by accelerating warfarin absorption, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. We aimed to assess the impact of PPI use on outcomes and quality of anticoagulant control in AF patients treated with OAC. Methods The COOL-AF registry was a nationwide prospective observational study enrolling AF patients from 27 hospitals in Thailand between 2014 and 2017. The registry aimed to evaluate antithrombotic patterns, quality of OAC control, and clinical outcomes. Clinical information of patients was collected every six months and until three years. Patients treated with oral anticoagulants (either warfarin or non-vitamin K antagonist OAC (NOAC)) were included in the present analysis. Patients receiving any PPI type and dosage at the registry entry were counted as PPI users. Poor anticoagulant control was defined as time to therapeutic range (TTR) less than 65%. The association between PPI use and outcomes, including GI bleeding, overall bleeding, all-cause mortality, and ischemic stroke or systemic embolization, were assessed in the Cox model adjusted for age, prior GI bleeding, chronic alcohol use, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, smoking, and baseline anemia. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients at high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score ≥ 3), and in patients concomitantly treated with antiplatelet. Results Of 3,402 patients in the registry, 2568 (75.5%) were treated with OAC at baseline. The prevalence of females was 43.4%, with a mean age of 68.4 years. The majority of patients (91.1%) received warfarin. The incidence of major bleeding was 2.11 (1.79–2.48) per 100 person-years. PPI was used at baseline in 707 patients (20.8%). Compared with their counterpart, PPI was more frequently used in high-bleeding risk patients (27.3% vs. 18.1%, p < 0.001) and in those with concomitant antiplatelet therapy (37.5% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001). The mean TTR was similar between PPI and non-PPI users (52.5% vs. 53.8%, p 0.37). PPI use was not associated with poor anticoagulant control (adjusted OR 1.12, 95% 0.89-1.40). The risk of GI bleeding in PPI users was similar to non-user (adjusted HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.59-1.75). The risk of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke or systemic embolization, and overall bleeding was not different between PPI and non-PPI users. There was no significant interaction between PPI use and bleeding risk or concomitant antiplatelet therapy on adverse outcomes. Conclusion PPI use has no impact on major outcomes, including bleeding in AF patients treated with OAC. The practice of concomitant prescribing of PPI in patients treated with OAC is needed to be re-examined, given the potentially high impact of health care costs.PPI use and outcomes

Association between regular proton pump inhibitors use and cardiovascular outcomes: A large prospective cohort study

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer disease. However, the association between the regular PPIs use and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether regular proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use is associated with an altered incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. MethodsThis prospective cohort study included 459,207 participants (mean [SD] age, 56.2 [8.1] years) from the UK Biobank study without prevalent CVD who enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and were followed until 2018. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident CVD and its components (coronary heart disease [CHD], stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism) were obtained using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for potential confounding factors, including demographic factors, lifestyle behaviors, prevalent comorbidities, and clinical indicators for PPIs use. ResultsDuring the follow-up period, we recorded 26,346 incident CVD events (including 13,749 CHD events, 4144 stroke events, 5812 atrial fibrillation events, 1159 heart failure events, and 4206 venous thromboembolism events). The fully adjusted HRs (and 95% CIs) associated with PPIs users compared to nonusers were 1.44 (95% CI 1.39–1.50) for incident CVD, 1.65 (95% CI 1.57–1.74) for CHD, 1.21 (95% CI 1.09–1.33) for stroke, 1.17 (95% CI 1.08–1.28) for atrial fibrillation, 1.61 (95% CI 1.37–1.89) for heart failure, and 1.36 (95% CI 1.24–1.50) for venous thromboembolism. ConclusionsRegular PPIs use was associated with higher risk of CVD outcomes. Clinicians should therefore exercise caution when prescribing PPIs.

The association between proton pump inhibitors and hyperparathyroidism: a potential mechanism for increased fracture—results of a large observational cohort study

SummaryProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture; however, the mechanism is unclear. PPI users taking calcium supplements were more likely to have hyperparathyroidism compared to non-users (OR 1.56, CI 1.08–2.23, p = 0.018). This highlights the importance of monitoring PPI use, especially in older adults.PurposeProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. Hyperparathyroidism may be implicated, but few studies have considered this relationship. This study evaluated the relationship between PPI use and hyperparathyroidism in older adults.MethodsParticipants were from the TUDA study, a large cross-sectional cohort of older Irish adults. Participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min and serum calcium > 2.5 mmol/l were excluded to avoid hyperparathyroidism due to chronic renal disease and primary hyperparathyroidism. Hyperparathyroidism was defined as a parathyroid hormone (PTH) > 65 pg/ml. Multivariate regression models were used to analyse the relationship between PPI use and hyperparathyroidism.ResultsA total of 4139 participants met the inclusion criteria, of whom 37.8% (n = 1563) were taking PPI medication. PPI use was identified in 41.4% of calcium supplement users and 35.4% of non-calcium supplement users. Overall, compared to non-users of PPIs, those taking PPIs were older (74.8 vs 72.9 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of hyperparathyroidism (17.8 vs 11.0%, p < 0.001). In those taking calcium supplements (but not in non-users), PPI use was significantly associated with hyperparathyroidism (OR 1.56, CI 1.08–2.23, p = 0.018) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, serum vitamin D, eGFR, timed-up-and-go, dairy intake, medications, and comorbidities.DiscussionThe results are consistent with the hypothesis of PPIs reducing calcium absorption, leading to a rise in PTH which could mediate increased fracture risk. No relationship of PPI use with hyperparathyroidism was observed in non-users of calcium supplements, possibly owing to lower dietary calcium intake. These results highlight the importance of monitoring PPI use, especially in older adults at risk of fracture.

#3958 PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS AND THE RISK OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN PATIENTS RECEIVING IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background and Aims Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly used in cancer patients. Multiple studies have found that PPI use is associated with a more than 2-fold increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, this association could possibly be explained by confounding by indication for PPI use. Method In a population-based cohort study, we compared the risk of AKI in users and non-users of PPI among cancer patients treated with ICI in Denmark during 2011-2021. We assessed exposure to PPI by filled prescriptions for PPI within 90 days before ICI initiation and identified AKI events within the first year after ICI initiation using plasma creatinine measurements from laboratory databases. We included information on potential confounders including important comorbidities and comedication. We estimated the propensity score for PPI use using logistic regression and calculated unweighted and standardized mortality ratio (SMR)-weighted absolute risks and hazard ratios (HRs) of AKI. To address any switch in PPI exposure during follow-up, we did an additional per-protocol analysis censoring patients upon switch in PPI exposure. We furthermore applied inverse probability of censoring (IPC) weights to mitigate informative censoring. Results We included 9,955 cancer patients treated with ICI. Among these, 2,668 (26.8%) were users of PPI. During the first year of follow-up, AKI occurred in 1,932 of the included patients, yielding an overall unweighted incidence rate of 30.1 per 100 person-years and a 1-year AKI risk of 21.3%. PPI users had an increased risk of AKI compared with non-users (1-year risk, 24.4% versus 20.2%; HR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.24-1.51]); however, this association attenuated when accounting for confounders by SMR weighting (SMR-weighted 1-year risk, 24.0% versus 23.3%; SMR-weighted HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.93-1.18]). In the per-protocol analysis, the unweighted HR was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.60-2.07), while the SMR- and IPC-weighted HR was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.03-1.45). Conclusion PPI use at the time of ICI initiation was not associated with an increased risk of AKI after SMR weighting. When considering switching of PPI exposure during follow-up, we observed that PPI use was associated with an increased risk of AKI; however, the association was much weaker than previously reported.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Before and After a Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have an impact on the gut microbiome. We investigated whether increased use of PPIs was associated with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The University of Manitoba IBD Epidemiology Database includes all Manitobans diagnosed with IBD between 1984 and 2018 with age-, sex-, and geography-matched control subjects and comprehensive prescription drug data from April 1995. Subjects were considered to be users if they received 2 PPI prescriptions. We assessed PPI prescriptions prediagnosis and for 3 years postdiagnosis of IBD. The absolute and relative rates were calculated and compared for PPI use pre- and post-IBD diagnosis. A total of 5920 subjects were diagnosed with IBD after April 1996. Rates of PPI use in control subjects increased gradually from 1.5% to 6.5% over 15 years. Persons with IBD had a higher rate of PPI use, peaking up to 17% within 1 year of IBD diagnosis with a rate ratio (RR) of 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-3.3). Furthermore, persons with Crohn's disease (RR, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.7-4.6) were more likely to have been PPI users prediagnosis than persons with ulcerative colitis (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.2-2.7). Important predictors of increased PPI use were older age, year of data collection, and Crohn's disease diagnosis. Persons with IBD have higher PPI use preceding their diagnosis. Possibly, the use of a PPI alters the gut microbiome, increasing the risk for IBD diagnosis; or persons with IBD have increased rates of dyspepsia, warranting PPI use; or some IBD symptoms are treated with PPIs whether warranted or not.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risks of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used drugs for gastric-acid-related diseases, which may have an impact on the gut microbiome. We aimed to evaluate the associations of PPI use with risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We analysed the associations of PPI use with risks of coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), stroke, and all-cause mortality in 19,229 adults with T2D using data from the UK Biobank study. During a median follow-up of 10.9-11.2 years, we documented a total of 2,971 CAD, 1,827 MI, 1,192 HF, and 738 stroke cases, along with 2,297 total deaths. PPI use was significantly associated with higher risks of CAD (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.40), MI (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.52), HF (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.57) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.45). No significant association was observed between PPI use and stroke (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.90-1.36). The results were consistent in the subgroup analyses stratified by factors including indications of PPI, anti-diabetic medication use, and antiplatelet drug use. Analyses in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort of PPI users versus non-users yielded similar results. Our data suggested that PPI use was associated with higher risks of CVD events and mortality among patients with T2D. The benefits and risks of PPI use should be carefully balanced among patients with T2D, and monitoring of adverse CVD events during PPI therapy should be enhanced.

Use of proton pump inhibitors and macrolide antibiotics and risk of acute kidney injury: a self-controlled case series study

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders such as peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia. However, several studies have suggested that PPI use increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). PPIs are often concomitantly used with antibiotics, such as macrolides and penicillins for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Although macrolide antibiotics are considered to have relatively low nephrotoxicity, they are well known to increase the risk of AKI due to drug-drug interactions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between PPI use and the development of AKI. We also evaluated the effect of concomitant use of PPIs and macrolide antibiotics on the risk of AKI.MethodsThis self-controlled case series study was conducted using electronic medical records at Kyoto University Hospital. We identified patients who were prescribed at least one PPI and macrolide antibiotic between January 2014 and December 2019 and underwent blood examinations at least once a year. An adjusted incident rate ratio (aIRR) of AKI with PPI use or concomitant use macrolide antibiotics with PPIs was estimated using a conditional Poisson regression model controlled for the estimated glomerular filtration rate at the beginning of observation and use of potentially nephrotoxic antibiotics.ResultsOf the 3,685 individuals who received PPIs and macrolide antibiotics, 766 patients with episodes of stage 1 or higher AKI were identified. Any stage of AKI was associated with PPI use (aIRR, 1.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 2.04)). Stage 2 or higher AKI was observed in 279 cases, with an estimated aIRR of 2.01 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.58, for PPI use). For the period of concomitant use of macrolide antibiotics with PPIs compared with the period of PPIs alone, an aIRR of stage 1 or higher AKI was estimated as 0.82 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.13).ConclusionsOur findings added epidemiological information for the association between PPI use and an increased risk of stage 1 or higher AKI. However, we did not detect an association between the concomitant use of macrolide antibiotics and an increased risk of AKI in PPI users.

The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Development of Gastric Neoplastic Lesions in Patients With Autoimmune Atrophic Gastritis.

IntroductionProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been widely prescribed as a primary treatment for acid-related disorders. A large body of literature reported several adverse outcomes due to PPI therapy, including an increased risk of gastric cancer (GC). Autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the oxyntic mucosa, leading to mucosal atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and reduced gastric acid secretion, up to the possible development of dysplasia and intestinal-type GC. Whether PPI use may increase the GC risk in AAG patients has not yet been investigated. We conducted a case–control study in AAG patients to assess the association between the PPI use before AAG diagnosis and the development of GC at follow-up (FU).Materials and MethodsPatients were included from a prospective cohort of AAG patients (diagnosed 1992–2021) in a referral center for gastric autoimmunity; all patients adhered to an endoscopic–histological FU program according to Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS) I/II (management of epithelial precancerous conditions) guidelines. At diagnosis, clinical/biochemical data and PPI use before AAG diagnosis (withdrawn at the time of diagnosis), for at least 12 months, were evaluated. Patients who developed gastric neoplastic lesions (GNLs) at FU were considered as cases; patients without a diagnosis of GNLs at FU were considered as controls. At a total FU of 2.3 years (1–13), 35 cases were identified, and controls were matched 2:1 by age ( ± 3 years), gender, and years of FU (n=70); therefore, a total of n=105 patients were included in the study.ResultsThe proportion of PPI users before AAG diagnosis was significantly higher in cases than in controls (54.3% vs. 18.6%, p<0.001). At logistic regression, considering as a dependent variable the development of GNLs at FU, a positive association was shown for PPI use before AAG diagnosis (OR 9.6, 95%CI 2.3–40.3), while other independent variables as the use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants (OR 2.8, 95%CI 0.7–12.0), age ≥ 50 years (OR 2.0, 95%CI 0.2–18.1), 1st-degree family history for GC (OR 2.4, 95%CI 0.4–15.2), and smoking habit (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.1–2.1) were not associated.ConclusionsPPI use before the diagnosis of AAG appears to considerably increase the risk of subsequent GNL development. Considering the common misuse of PPIs, physicians should regularly reevaluate the appropriateness of ongoing PPI therapy, in particular in patients with a clinical suspicion of or already diagnosed AAG.

Increased risk of biliary infection after biliary stent placement in users of proton pump inhibitors.

ObjectivesProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed medications for gastric acid‐induced diseases. Despite the effectiveness of PPIs, recent evidence suggested an increased risk of various bacterial infections in PPI users. The current study was conducted to evaluate the risk of biliary infection after endoscopic biliary stent placement in regular users of PPIs.MethodsConsecutive patients with a native papilla who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and stent placement for biliary stricture between January 2010 and August 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The cumulative incidences of biliary infection were compared between regular and non‐regular PPI users.ResultsDuring the study period, 270 regular PPI users and 146 non‐regular PPI users were included in the analyses. Age, gender, and indication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were not different between the two groups. The incidences of biliary infection were 43% in regular PPI users and 36% in non‐regular PPI users but the time to biliary infection was significantly shorter in regular PPI users than in non‐regular users (28 vs. 87 days, p = 0.01). The cumulative incidence of biliary infection was significantly higher in regular PPI users compared with non‐regular users (p = 0.008). The multivariable Cox regression analysis also showed a significantly higher hazard ratio of biliary infection in regular PPI users (1.62 [95% confidence interval 1.16–2.26; p = 0.005]).ConclusionsRegular PPI use was associated with a higher risk of biliary infection after endoscopic biliary drainage. Inappropriate PPI use should be avoided.

Esomeprazole covalently interacts with the cardiovascular enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase: Insights into the cardiovascular risk of proton pump inhibitors

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Several meta-analysis studies have reported associations between prolonged use of PPIs and major adverse cardiovascular events. However, interaction of PPIs with biological molecules involved in cardiovascular health is incompletely characterized. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) is a cardiovascular enzyme expressed in cardiomyocytes, and other somatic cell types in one of two isotypes (DDAH1 and DDAH2) to metabolize asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA); a cardiovascular risk factor and competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide synthases (NOSs). MethodsWe performed high throughput drug screening of over 130,000 small molecules to discover human DDAH1 inhibitors and found that PPIs directly inhibit DDAH1. We expressed and purified the enzyme for structural and mass spectrometry proteomics studies to understand how a prototype PPI, esomeprazole, interacts with DDAH1. We also performed molecular docking studies to model the interaction of DDAH1 with esomeprazole. X-ray crystallography was used to determine the structure of DDAH1 alone and bound to esomeprazole at resolutions ranging from 1.6 to 2.9 Å. ResultsAnalysis of the enzyme active site shows that esomeprazole interacts with the active site cysteine (Cys273) of DDAH1. The structural studies were corroborated by mass spectrometry which indicated that cysteine was targeted by esomeprazole to inactivate DDAH1. ConclusionsThe inhibition of this important cardiovascular enzyme by a PPI may help explain the reported association of PPI use and increased cardiovascular risk in patients and the general population. General significanceOur study calls for pharmacovigilance studies to monitor adverse cardiovascular events in chronic PPI users.

Comparative risk of incidence and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 among proton pump inhibitor and histamine-2 receptor antagonist short-term users: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate incidence risk and adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 disease among short-term users of acid-suppressants in South Korea.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study, conducted using a nationwide claims database for South Korea, used data from patients with COVID-19 tested between January 1 and May 15, 2020. Patients aged over 18 years and prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) for more than 7 days were identified. Primary outcome was COVID-19 while secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, hospitalization with respiratory disease, or intensive respiratory intervention. Large-scale propensity scores were used to match patients, while the Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to evaluate any association between exposure and outcome(s). The risk estimates were calibrated by using 123 negative control outcomes.ResultsWe identified 26,166 PPI users and 62,117 H2RA users. After propensity score matching, compared to H2RA use, PPI use was not significantly associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (calibrated hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30–2.19]); moreover, PPI use was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19, namely, hospitalization with respiratory disease (calibrated HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.72–1.08]), intensive respiratory interventions (calibrated HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.46–1.82]), except for all-cause mortality (calibrated HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.31–0.95]).ConclusionsIn this study, we found that the PPI user was not associated with risk of COVID-19 compared to H2RA users. There was no significant relationship between severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19 and exposure to PPI compared with H2RA, except for all-cause mortality.

Regular use of proton-pump inhibitors and risk of stroke: a population-based cohort study and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

BackgroundAlthough randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested a non-significant increased risk of stroke among proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users, the association has not been confirmed. We evaluated the association between regular use of PPIs and incident stroke and identified population groups at high net risk.MethodsThis is a prospective analysis of 492,479 participants free of stroke from the UK biobank. Incident stroke was identified through linkage to hospital admission and death registries using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes (I60, I61, I63, and I64). We evaluated hazard ratios (HRs) adjusting for demographic factors, lifestyle habits, prevalent comorbidities, concomitant use of medications, and indications of PPIs. We assessed the risk differences (RDs) according to the baseline Framingham Stroke Risk Score. In the meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from 1988 to 1 June 2020) for randomized trials comparing PPIs with other interventions, placebo, or no treatment on stroke risk. Results were combined using a fix-effect meta-analysis (Mantel-Haenszel method).ResultsWe documented 5182 incident strokes over 3,935,030 person-years of follow-up. Regular PPI users had a 16% higher risk of stroke than non-users (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27). The estimated effect was similar to our meta-analysis of nine RCTs (case/participants 371/26,642; RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.50; quality of evidence: moderate). The absolute effect of PPI use on stroke increased with the baseline Framingham Stroke Risk Score, with an RD of 1.34‰, 3.32‰, 4.83‰, and 6.28‰ over 5 years for the lowest, quartile 2, quartile 3, and the highest quartile, respectively.ConclusionsRegular use of PPIs was associated with an increased risk of stroke, with a higher absolute risk observed in individuals with high baseline stroke risk. Physicians should therefore exercise caution when prescribing PPIs. An assessment of the underlying stoke risk is recommended for individualized use of PPIs.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Increases Pyogenic Liver Abscess Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Background/AimsProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increase gastric pH and alter the gut microbiome. An increased risk for infectious diseases has been reported in PPI users. However, little is known about the association of PPI use with pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) incidence risk.MethodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study using data from a nationwide representative sample of the Korean general population followed up for 10 years (January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2013). We identified PPI prescriptions and considered PPI as a time-varying variable. Proportional hazards regression model was used for incident PLA comparing PPI use versus non-use. Propensity score matching was also conducted.ResultsDuring the 4 209 229 person-years of follow-up, 58 595 participants had at least 1 PPI prescription and 541 patients developed liver abscess. The age-, sex-, residential area-, and income-adjusted hazard ratio for PLA incidence with PPI use was 4.19 (95% CI, 2.54-6.92). The association was observed in fully adjusted models (hazard ratio 3.88; 95% CI, 2.33-6.44). The positive association between PPI use and PLA was consistent in all subgroups analyzed and in propensity score matching group.ConclusionThe present data indicate that PPI use is associated with an increased PLA risk. Therefore, it is necessary to prescribe PPIs with clear indication and to avoid improper use of PPIs.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prevent gastric cancer associated with the use of proton pump inhibitors after Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Background and AimProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a potential cause of gastric carcinogenesis after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Thus, appropriate management including chemoprevention is required. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the incidence of post‐eradication gastric cancer in PPI users.MethodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients who used a PPI (≥30 days) after H. pylori eradication between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed in nine hospital databases. Gastric cancer incidence was a primary outcome, and their association with NSAIDs use and clinical factors was evaluated. Hazard ratios were adjusted by age, sex, smoking, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.ResultsDuring the mean follow‐up period of 2.38 years, 1.13% (31/2431) of all patients developed gastric cancer. The cumulative incidence of gastric cancer in PPI users was 0.25% at 1 year, 0.51% at 3 years, and 1.09% at 5 years in the NSAID users and 0.89% at 1 year, 2.32% at 3 years, and 3.61% at 5 years in nonusers. NSAIDs were associated with a lower gastric cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.28, P = 0.005). No gastric cancer was observed in the cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitor users (n = 256). NSAID use with high dose and long duration was significantly associated with a lower incidence of gastric cancer.ConclusionNSAIDs were associated with a 60% decrease in the gastric cancer incidence in H. pylori‐eradicated PPI users, with dose and duration response effects. NSAIDs may be effective for chemoprevention against PPI‐related gastric cancer.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Is Not Strongly Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Related Outcomes: A Nationwide Study and Meta-analysis

Background & AimsProton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been associated with increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe outcomes. However, meta-analyses show unclear results, leading to uncertainty regarding the safety of PPI use during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide observational study including all SARS-CoV-2 cases (n = 83,224) in Denmark as of December 1, 2020. The association of current PPI use with risk of infection was examined in a case-control design. We investigated the risk of severe outcomes, including mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, or death, in current PPI users (n = 4473) compared with never users. Propensity score matching was applied to control for confounding. Finally, we performed an updated meta-analysis on risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mortality attributable to PPI use.ResultsCurrent PPI use was associated with increased risk of infection; adjusted odds ratio, 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–1.13). Among SARS-CoV-2 cases, PPI use was associated with increased risk of hospital admission; adjusted relative risk, 1.13 (1.03–1.24), but not with other severe outcomes. The updated meta-analysis showed no association between PPI use and risk of infection or mortality; pooled odds ratio, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.75–1.32) and relative risk, 1.33 (95% CI, 0.71–2.48).ConclusionsCurrent PPI use may be associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission, but these results with minimally elevated estimates are most likely subject to residual confounding. No association was found for severe outcomes. The results from the meta-analysis indicated no impact of current PPI use on COVID-19 outcomes.

Association between a low dose of proton pump inhibitors and kidney function decline in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective observational study.

ObjectivesProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for acid suppression therapy. Recently, PPI use was reported to be associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, whether a low dose of PPIs is associated with CKD remains unknown.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included hypertensive patients who visited Kenwakai Hospital between 2017 and 2019. Renal parameters, such as the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (Scr), were extracted from medical records and compared between three years before treatment and the baseline. PPI use was assessed as cumulative exposure for three years.ResultsThe study population included 152 patients (57.9% men; mean age, 74.5 years). Of those, 35.5% were PPI users (low dose, 17.1%; high dose, 18.4%). A significant decrease in eGFR and an increase in Scr were observed between three years before treatment and the baseline in the high-dose PPI group but not the non-use or low-dose PPI groups.ConclusionsOur results suggest that a low dose of PPIs may be safe in clinical settings, but further prospective studies are needed to clarify our findings.

Risk factors of poor prognosis and impairment of activities of daily living in patients with hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcers

BackgroundImpairment of activities of daily living (ADL) due to hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcers (HGU) has rarely been evaluated. We analyzed the risk factors of poor prognosis, including mortality and impairment of ADL, in patients with HGU.MethodsIn total, 582 patients diagnosed with HGU were retrospectively analyzed. Admission to a care facility or the need for home adaptations during hospitalization were defined as ADL decline. The clinical factors were evaluated: endoscopic features, need for interventional endoscopic procedures, comorbidities, symptoms, and medications. The risk factors of outcomes were examined with multivariate analysis.ResultsAdvanced age (> 75 years) was a significant predictor of poor prognosis, including impairment of ADL. Additional significant risk factors were renal disease (odds ratio [OR] 3.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44–8.14) for overall mortality, proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) usage prior to hemorrhage (OR 5.80; 95% CI 2.08–16.2), and heart disease (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.11–8.43) for the impairment of ADL. Analysis of elderly (> 75 years) subjects alone also revealed that use of PPIs prior to hemorrhage was a significant predictor for the impairment of ADL (OR 8.24; 95% CI 2.36–28.7).ConclusionIn addition to advanced age, the presence of comorbidities was a risk of poor outcomes in patients with HGU. PPI use prior to hemorrhage was a significant risk factor for the impairment of ADL, both in overall HGU patients and in elderly patients alone. These findings suggest that the current strategy for PPI use needs reconsideration.

The effect of proton pump inhibitor uses on outcomes for cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed for preventing and treating gastrointestinal ulcers. In patients with advanced cancer, it is unclear whether concomitant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and PPIs could result in poorer outcomes. This study investigates the impact of PPIs on the survival of cancer patients treated with ICIs.MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 1, 1970 to June 2, 2020 for studies reporting the prognoses of cancer patients receiving antitumor therapies including ICIs with or without PPIs. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported to express the effectiveness of ICIs in PPI users compared to non-PPI users, using a random effects model.ResultsFive studies were identified comprising 1,167 cancer patients. Concomitant use of PPIs with ICIs did not result in statistically significant changes in OS (HR 0.996; 95% CI: 0.486–1.447) and PFS (HR 0.858; 95% CI: 0.388–1.328). Statistical testing suggested heterogeneity among studies. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of our results.ConclusionsConcomitant ICI-PPI therapy does not appear to be significantly associated with OS or PFS, and further research on the effect of individual ICIs in different cancer patients is needed.

Proton pump inhibitors and dementia risk: Evidence from a cohort study using linked routinely collected national health data in Wales, UK.

ObjectivesProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed for prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal conditions or for gastroprotection from other drugs. Research suggests they are linked to increased dementia risk. We use linked national health data to examine the association between PPI use and the development of incident dementia.Methods and findingsA population-based study using electronic health-data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank, Wales (UK) from 1999 to 2015. Of data available on 3,765,744 individuals, a cohort who had ever been prescribed a PPI was developed (n = 183,968) for people aged 55 years and over and compared to non-PPI exposed individuals (131,110). Those with prior dementia, mild-cognitive-impairment or delirium codes were excluded. Confounding factors included comorbidities and/or drugs associated with them. Comorbidities might include head injury and some examples of medications include antidepressants, antiplatelets and anticoagulants. These commonly prescribed drugs were investigated as it was not feasible to explore all drugs in this study. The main outcome was a diagnosis of incident dementia. Cox proportional hazard regression modelling was used to calculate the Hazard ratio (HR) of developing dementia in PPI-exposed compared to unexposed individuals while controlling for potential confounders.The mean age of the PPI exposed individuals was 69.9 years and 39.8% male while the mean age of the unexposed individuals was 72.1 years and 41.1% male. The rate of PPI usage was 58.4% (183,968) and incident dementia rate was 11.8% (37,148/315,078). PPI use was associated with decreased dementia risk (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.67, p<0.01).ConclusionsThis study, using large-scale, multi-centre health-data was unable to confirm an association between PPI use and increased dementia risk. Previously reported links may be associated with confounders of people using PPI’s, such as increased risk of cardiovascular disease and/or depression and their associated medications which may be responsible for any increased risk of developing dementia.