Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation Research Articles

Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency ablation of stellate ganglion in upper-extremity phantom limb pain: a case series

BackgroundPhantom limb pain (PLP) is the most common type of pain experienced by amputees and is chronic and complex, with manifestations including pain in a limb that no longer exists. To date, treatments that are pharmaceutical or surgical in nature are relatively ineffective at bringing much relief as the pathophysiology of PLP is somewhat obscure. Chronic pain syndromes such as PLP may benefit from sympathetic nervous system modulation through the stellate ganglion.Case Ten refractory PLP patients treated with ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion pulsed radiofrequency ablation (SG PRF) after a diagnostic stellate ganglion block took effect: A case series Patients were assessed before and after the treatment at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Significant reductions in pain as measured using a numerical rating scale; Pain Disability Indexwas improved, and Medication Quantification Scale also was improved. Minimal side effects.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided SG PRF has provided promising results for PLP by giving the patient with sustained pain relief and functional improvement without much side effects. Further studies need to be done to validate this finding.

A novel technique to identify and thermally ablate the greater occipital nerve for patients with occipital neuralgia: a retrospective study with cadaveric and ex-vivo validation.

This manuscript presents the challenges of treating various forms of headaches and the potential of interventional techniques targeting the greater occipital nerve (GON) to alleviate the burden on patients. Occipital neuralgia, characterized by stabbing or shooting pain in the base of the skull, is often associated with primary, cervicogenic, or migraine headaches. While occipital nerve blocks offer temporary relief, durable treatment options are limited. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and thermal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) have shown promise as minimally invasive procedures for long-term treatment. However, GON is not easily identified using ultrasound or fluoroscopic analysis; thereby, minimizing success of proper ablation. Here, the authors provide a percutaneous strategy to localize the GON and maximize lesion performance. We intend to provide an ex-vivo description of staggered bipolar radiofrequency (RF) lesioning and include the use of staggered bipolar lesioning of the GON and stimulation of the semispinalis capitis. We also analyzed the effectiveness and side effects from this ablation, retrospectively. Patients with chronic refractory GON neuralgia were selected for GON TRFA. A novel double needle technique of sequential electrical stimulation was used to localize the GON and approximate needle to nerve distance. Once the needles were positioned adjacent to the GON, TRFA was performed using a bipolar staggered technique. Twenty-two patients with GON were treated with TRFA using a novel double needle technique. Seventy-two percent of these patients reported greater than 50% pain relief at both 1 and 6 months following the procedure. The results of our ex-vivo study demonstrate that performing TRFA using the parallel needle bipolar approach separated 8 mm apart produced the most desirable lesion dimensions that may correlate with effective ablation of the GON. This study demonstrates a new localization and ablation technique to treat refractory headaches. However, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation (PRFA) and surgery for treating chronic plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief and functional outcomes. A prospective study involved 30 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis unresponsive to 12 months of conservative treatment. Patients were divided into PRFA (n = 17) and surgical (n = 13) groups. Clinical evaluations were conducted preoperatively and at three, six and 12 months postoperatively using VAS, AOFAS, FFI, and RMS scores. Radiological measurements assessed foot structure impact. Both PRFA and surgery significantly reduced pain and improved function. PRFA had a shorter operative time and quicker return to activities (p < 0.001). At 3 months, PRFA showed superior VAS, FFI, and RMS scores (p < 0.05). Long-term outcomes were similar. No major complications occurred, but minor complications were higher in the surgical group (p < 0.01). PRFA is a minimally invasive, effective treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis with quicker recovery and lower complication rates compared to surgery. Both treatments offer comparable long-term benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Features of clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of Bertolotti syndrome: а clinical case

BACKGROUND: One of the causes of pain in the lumbar spine may be congenital spinal column malformations. Bertolotti syndrome is a clinical and radiological symptom complex associated with sacralization of the LV vertebra, leading to disruption of the biomechanics of the lumbosacral spine and accelerated degeneration of facet joints and intervertebral discs, followed by foraminal and central stenosis of the spinal canal. The clinical manifestations of the disease can be polymorphic, and their cause is multifactorial. Thus, along with pain in the lumbar spine, patients with sacralization of the LV vertebra suffer from numbness and paresthesia in the lower extremities. The incidence of pathology ranges from 4% to 8%, mainly affecting elderly and mature people. СLINICAL CASE DESCRIPTION: Patient S was born in 1982 with long-term nonspecific pain in the back and lower limb; she presented to the Neurosurgical Department of the Irkutsk Scientific Center for Surgery and Traumatology. During a clinical neurological examination and additional introscopic studies of the lumbar spine, dorsopathy diagnosed. Degenerative spondyloarthrosis LIV–LV grade III according to D. Weishaupt. Sacralization of the LV vertebra type IIa according to Castellvi A.E. Syndrome of lumbar ischialgia on the right. Persistent pain and muscle-tonic syndrome. Minimally invasive interventional treatment was performed: pulsed radiofrequency ablation of the dorsal ganglion and radicular nerve at the level of the foraminal openings LIV–LV on the right and thermal radiofrequency ablation of the recurrent nerve of Luschka at the level of LIV–LV and LV–SI on the right. In the postoperative period, the intensity of the pain syndrome decreased, and the patient was discharged to work. CONCLUSION: A promising method of minimally invasive surgery is radiofrequency ablation in the area of neoarthrosis for denervation and relief of pathological pain impulses. Assessing the patient’s complaints, carefully collecting anamnesis, interpreting data from a clinical and neurological examination, and introscopic methods of examining the lumbar spine enables establishing an accurate diagnosis and selecting the most effective treatment method.

Pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation vs. high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up (PRIORI study).

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, non-thermal, cardiac tissue-selective ablation modality. To date, radiofrequency (RF)-guided high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation represents the gold standard besides cryo-ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This single-centre, retrospective study investigated the efficacy of PFA-PVI vs. HPSD-RF PVI in terms of single-procedure arrhythmia-free outcome and safety in a real-world setting. Consecutive, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent PVI using PFA or HPSD-RF were enrolled. In group PFA, PVI was performed using a pentaspline PFA catheter. The ablation procedure in group HPSD-RF was performed with RF energy (45 W, ablation index). A total of 410 patients (group PFA, 201; group HPSD-RF, 209) were included. There was no difference between both groups regarding age, gender, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. The procedure time was significantly shorter in group PFA [61 (44-103) vs. 125 (105-143) min; P < 0.001]; fluoroscopy time and dose area product were significantly higher in group PFA [16 (13-20) vs. 4 (2-5) min; P < 0.01 and 412 (270-739) vs. 129 (58-265) μGym2; P < 0.01]. The overall complication rates were 2.9% in group PFA and 6.2% in group HPSD (P = 0.158). There was one fatal stroke in the PFA group. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 85% with PFA and 79% with HPSD-RF (log-rank P = 0.160). In 56 repeat ablation procedures, the PV reconnection rate was 30% after PFA and 38% after HPSD-RF (P = 0.372). Both PFA and HPSD-RF were highly efficient and effective in achieving PVI in paroxysmal AF patients. The arrhythmia-free survival is comparable. The PV reconnection rate was not different.

Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency ablation of suprascapular nerve versus local anaesthetics with steroids in patients with chronic shoulder pain: A randomised controlled trial.

Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency ablation of suprascapular nerve versus local anaesthetics with steroids in patients with chronic shoulder pain: A randomised controlled trial.

Radiofrequency ablation for the cervical spine.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a minimally invasive procedure for pain reduction, is increasingly used for managing chronic neck pain and headaches. This article offers a concise overview of cervical spine RFA. In the context of RFA, heat is applied to specific nerve tissues to interrupt pain signals. Wallarian degeneration occurs as a result of the thermal injury to the nerve. The heat generated by the RFA procedure can damage the nerve fibers, initiating the degenerative process. Wallarian degeneration is a process that occurs in a nerve axon due to the thermal injury, leading to the breakdown and eventual degradation of the axon and its myelin sheath. However, nerves have regeneration capacity, especially the peripheral nerves, which are often the target of RFA for pain management. After Wallarian degeneration takes place, the nerve sheath, or the connective tissue surrounding the nerve, can serve as a scaffold for the growth of new nerve fibers. Over time, these new fibers can regenerate and re-establish connections, potentially restoring nerve function. Three common types are traditional thermal, water-cooled, and pulsed radio frequency ablation. Given the regenerative potential of nerves, these procedures are typically effective for 1 to 2 years, with some variability. Despite a 112% increase in Medicare claims for RFA from 2009 to 2018, it's recommended for patients who respond positively to diagnostic medial branch blocks, with recent guidelines suggesting a single block may be sufficient. Although generally effective, the procedure carries risks, including nerve and tissue injury. Notably, the procedure's increased utilization notably surpasses the most commonly reported prevalence rates of conditions it aims to treat. Moreover, diagnostic blocks performed before cervical RFA also have their risks, such as inadvertent vascular injections leading to seizures or paralysis. In summary, the risks and benefits of cervical RFA must be considered with regards to the patient's comorbidities and specific pain issues. The skill and experience of the practitioner plays a significant role in minimizing these risks. Detailed discussions with healthcare providers about the risks, benefits, and alternatives can help in making an informed decision about the procedure.

Direct epicardial validation of posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation: pulsed field versus radiofrequency ablation

Abstract Background Lesion transmurality is an important determinant of durable effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of different energy sources on the achievement of transmural left atrial (LA) ablation has not been explored so far. Purpose We sought to compare the transmurality associated with pulsed field ablation (PFA) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation of LA posterior wall (PW) among patients with persistent AF. Methods Eight patients (mean age, 70±7 years; 88% male) undergoing CA for persistent AF with PW ablation and adjunctive high-density epicardial mapping were included in a multicenter international registry. In four patients, PW ablation was performed using PFA, while in the remaining four, RF energy was used with high/very-high-power short-duration settings. The primary study outcome was transmural PW isolation (PWI) with endocardial-only ablation. Results A trend towards shorter times required to complete endocardial PW ablation was observed with PFA compared to RF (9±1 vs 11±2min, p=0.065). At endocardial mapping, apparent PWI was observed in all cases. However, transmural PWI after endocardial-only ablation was demonstrated in each patient in the PFA group, but only in one RF case, in whom 50 Watt/≥10 sec settings were used (100% vs 25%, p=0.143). Interestingly, in three patients in the RF group, endocardial ablation resulted in conversion of AF into atypical flutter, which could be successfully terminated by epicardial ablation. Conclusions We observed a trend towards greater transmurality with PFA compared to high/very-high power RF ablation in the region of septopulmonary bundle. This observation may have potential implications on clinical outcomes after endocardial AF CA.

Posterior wall isolation with pulsed field ablation or radiofrequency ablation with vein of marshall ethanol ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background In patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) two ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have recently gained increased interest: posterior wall isolation (PWI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) and Vein of Marshall (VoM) ethanol ablation combined with radiofrequency energy ablation (RFA). However, a direct comparison is lacking. Purpose To compare prospectively enrolled patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation for persistent AF using PVI and PWI with PFA (PFA group) vs. PVI and VoM ethanol ablation using RFA (VoM group) regarding procedural characteristics, safety, myocardial injury and outcomes. Methods Patients undergoing redo PFA-PVI with PWI and VoM ethanol ablation with RFA were included. Isolation and bidirectional block were checked using a multipolar mapping catheter. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) was measured after 24h of ablation. Results A total of 84 patients were included (age 69 [interquartile range (IQR) 63-75] years; ejection fraction 56% [IQR 48-60%]; left atrial size 42 [IQR 37-47] mm), baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Of these, 54 patients (64%) were in the PFA group and 30 (36%) in the VoM group. The procedure duration (65 [IQR 56-73] minutes vs 116 [IQR 103-142] minutes; p &amp;lt; .001) and fluoroscopic times (11 [IQR 8–14] minutes vs 14 [IQR 12-19] minutes; p &amp;lt; .001) were significantly shorter for the PFA group than for the VoM group. No major complications were observed except for a probable allergic reaction in the VoM group and a transient AV-block in the PFA group. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels post ablation were similar between the PFA group and the VoM group with 886 [IQR 627–1260] ng/L and 793 [IQR 543-1199] ng/L, p=0.28, respectively. During follow-up (median duration 230 [IQR 117-370] days), AF recurrence was observed in 15% in the PFA group and in 40% in the VOM group (p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion In patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation for AF, PVI and PWI using PFA is associated with shorter procedure and fluoroscopic times, similar high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels and a reduced recurrence rate compared to PVI using RFA with additional VoM ethanol ablation.Central Illustration

Comparison of pulsed field and radiofrequency ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis

Abstract Background Ablation of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging and often requires left atrial substrate ablation. While the pentaspline, multi-electrode pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter is approved for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its role in procedures involving substrate ablation for nonparoxysmal forms of AF remains unknown. Purpose We conducted a retrospective study to assess the safety and long-term outcomes of PFA for non-paroxysmal AF. Methods Procedural and follow-up data were retrospectively collected for all patients undergoing a first-time ablation for non-paroxysmal AF across two centers, between November 2021 and December 2022. Patients undergoing PFA consisting of PVI, isolation of the posterior wall (PWI) and ablation of the mitral isthmus (MI) with the pentaspline multi-electrode PFA catheter, were compared with patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) involving PVI, a roof line or PWI, alcohol ablation of the vein of Marshal (VOM) and MI ablation. Patients were matched using propensity scores to minimize potential confounders. The primary endpoint was arrhythmia (AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia) recurrence after a 90-day blanking period. Results The baseline characteristics of the 116 matched patients are detailed in Table 1. PVI was successful in all patients. In the PFA group, PWI was additionally performed in all patients and MI ablation in 83% of cases, resulting in acute success rates of 97% and 96%, respectively. In the RFA group lesions beyond PVI included: a roof line (90%), PWI (10%), VOM alcohol ablation (93%) and MI ablation with ablation in the coronary sinus (CS) if needed (97%). Procedural block across the roof and the MI was achieved in 96% and 95%, respectively and complete PWI in 83% of cases. The PFA group had a shorter total procedure (84.2±22.3 vs 117.3±24.8 min, p&amp;lt;0.001) but a longer fluoroscopy time (23.1±7.2 vs 16.8±6.3 min, p&amp;lt;0.001). The difference in radiation dose, however, was not statistically significant (57.7±74.1 Gy.cm2 in the PFA vs 49.8±53.6 Gy.cm2 in the RFA group, p=0.24). The overall periprocedural complication rates were similar in both groups (8.6% PFA vs 12.1% RFA, p=0.76), with no cardiac tamponades or deaths. Group-specific complications included 1 coronary spasm in the PFA group and 1 CS dissection in the RFA group. During a median follow-up of 447 days (IQR: 364-552), 1 stroke occurred in each group and 1 sudden cardiac death in the RFA group, 13 months post-procedure. Both groups had similar rates of recurrences (32.8% PFA vs 25.9% RFA, p=0.54). Arrhythmia-free survival probability at 16 months was estimated at 67.2% for PFA and 77.6% for RFA by Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.16, Figure 1). Conclusions In this propensity-matched cohort of patients with non-paroxysmal AF, PFA and RFA demonstrated similar complication rates and arrhythmia-free survival at follow-up. The procedure duration, however, was significantly shorter with PFA.Figure 1

Safety and myocardio-necrosis laboratory data trend in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: pulsed field ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation

Abstract Background Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) is an innovative technology to perform atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. No form of thermal energy is used, but an irreversible electroporation mechanism that causes selective cardiomyocytes death, sparing the cells of adjacent tissues. There are few data in the literature about peri-procedural trend of myocardium-necrosis laboratory data in patients undergoing PFA versus those with radiofrequency (RF). Purpose Compare the short-term safety and the peri-procedural trend of myocardium-necrosis laboratory data in patients undergoing PFA with those undergoing standard-power (40W) RF catheter ablation. Methods 50 patients undergoing paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with pulmonary veins isolation were retrospectively enrolled, 25 treated with PFA and 25 with RF (matched for age, sex, BMI, left atrium size). The PFA protocol involved four two-second deliveries with the penta-spline catheter in the "basket" and in the "flower" configuration; about RF ablation, circular lesions were carried out at the antrum of each pulmonary vein. All patients underwent serial blood samples including troponin I (TnI, n.v. 0-50 ng/L) and CKMB (n.v 0-5 ng/mL) at time 0 and at 3, 24 and 48 post-procedure hours. Complication were evaluated at pre-discharge visit and at 3-month follow-up. Results The clinical and echocardiographic patient’s characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The TnI and CKMB baseline values were within normal range for all patients, both those treated with PFA and those treated with RF, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two group. Regarding the TnI and CKMB values temporal increase, a statistically significant increase was observed in patients treated with PFA (Table 2). The TnI percentage decrease over the 48 hours in RF-treated patients, although not statistically significant, is slower compared to patients treated with PFA. This data could be explained by considering that PFA causes acute damage (myocardiocytes necrosis by electroporation) with less inflammation and a less progressive nature, while RF causes damage with greater irritation and progression (coagulative necrosis) that may result in myocardial necrosis even in the subsequent hours. Despite evidence of greater myocardial necrosis, there were not procedural complications in those treated with PFA. Therefore, the TnI increase is indicative of selective myocardial damage, likely more antral. Conclusion The increase of myocardio-necrosis laboratory data appears to be higher using PFA compared to RF, and it is not associated with greater adverse events. The trend of the myocardio-necrosis laboratory data shows different reduction curves between PFA and RF, probably related to different ablation power source; these data will need to be re-analysed with a greater number of cases.Table 1Table 2

Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial

Clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are suboptimal due, in part, to challenges in achieving durable lesions. Although focal point-by-point ablation allows for the creation of any required lesion set, this strategy necessitates the generation of contiguous lesions without gaps. A large-tip catheter, capable of creating wide-footprint ablation lesions, may increase ablation effectiveness and efficiency. In a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, 420 patients with persistent AF underwent ablation using a large-tip catheter with dual pulsed field and radiofrequency energies versus ablation using a conventional radiofrequency ablation system. The primary composite effectiveness endpoint was evaluated through 1 year and included freedom from acute procedural failure and repeat ablation at any time, plus arrhythmia recurrence, drug initiation or escalation or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from a composite of serious procedure-related or device-related adverse events. The primary effectiveness endpoint was observed for 73.8% and 65.8% of patients in the investigational and control arms, respectively (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). Major procedural or device-related complications occurred in three patients in the investigational arm and in two patients in the control arm (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). In a secondary analysis, procedural times were shorter in the investigational arm as compared to the control arm (P < 0.0001). These results demonstrate non-inferior safety and effectiveness of the dual-energy catheter for the treatment of persistent AF. Future large-scale studies are needed to gather real-world evidence on the impact of the focal dual-energy lattice catheter on the broader population of patients with AF. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05120193.

Comparing pulsed field electroporation and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: design and rationale of the BEAT PAROX-AF randomized clinical trial.

Using thermal-based energy sources [radiofrequency (RF) energy/cryo energy] for catheter ablation is considered effective and safe when performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, treatment success remains limited and complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into non-target tissues. We aim to compare pulsed field ablation (PFA) with RF ablation in terms of efficacy and safety for patients with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF. The BEAT PAROX-AF trial is a European multicentre, superiority, open-label randomized clinical trial in two parallel groups. A total of 292 participants were recruited in 9 high-volume European clinical centres in 5 countries. Patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to PFA (FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System©, Boston Scientific) or RF using the CLOSE protocol with contact force sensing catheter (SmartTouch© catheter and CARTO© Biosense Webster). The primary endpoint will be the 1-year recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, and the major secondary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of acute (<7 days) procedure-related serious adverse events, or pulmonary vein stenosis, or atrio-oesophageal fistula up to 12 months. Additionally, five sub-studies investigate the effect of PFA on oesophageal safety, cerebral lesions, cardiac autonomic nervous system, durability of PVI as assessed during redo ablation procedures, and atrial and ventricular function. The study began on 27 December 2021 and concluded recruitment on 17 January 2024. Results will be available in mid-2025. The BEAT PAROX-AF trial aims to provide critical insights into the optimal treatment approach for patients with paroxysmal AF.

Bipolar, high-voltage, long-duration pulsed radiofrequency ablation of the Gasserian ganglion for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in a patient with a cardiac implantable electronic device: illustrative case.

One of the common methods of treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) nowadays is radiofrequency therapy. However, it has serious limitations in patients with a cardiac pacemaker because of electromagnetic interference. Therefore, it is crucial to select optimal radiofrequency ablation parameters to make this procedure safe with favorable outcomes for such patients. In this study, the authors present a case of a 70-year-old man with a history of cardiac pacemaker dependency and previous microvascular decompression with complaints of severe, constant facial pain. After reprogramming the cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), the authors performed bipolar, high-voltage, long-duration pulsed radiofrequency therapy (PRFT) of the Gasserian ganglion under electrocardiography and pulse rate control in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods. There were no cardiovascular or neurological complications after PRFT. The patient reported relief of pain after the procedure, and at the 9-month follow-up, he was pain-free. This clinical case demonstrates that the use of bipolar, high-voltage PRFT for TN treatment in patients with a CIED can be safe and effective, provided that the rules and pacemaker instructions are followed. It is necessary to use ablative treatment with caution and to guide the patient in collaboration with a cardiac surgeon and an anesthesiologist resuscitator.

A novel platform allowing for pulsed field and radiofrequency ablation: First commercial atrial fibrillation ablation procedures worldwide with and without general anesthesia

A novel platform allowing for pulsed field and radiofrequency ablation: First commercial atrial fibrillation ablation procedures worldwide with and without general anesthesia

ОТДАЛЕННЫЕ РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ ПУЛЬСОВОЙ РАДИОЧАСТОТНОЙ АБЛАЦИИ У ПАЦИЕНТОВ С НЕВРОПАТИЕЙ ПОЛОВЫХ НЕРВОВ

The study includes medical records of patients with pudendal neuropathy (PN) who underwent the pulsed radiofrequency ablation (PRA) procedure. Clinical parameters and adverse events were studied during the entire perioperative period. The follow-up period for the respondents was at least 24 months. The study includes medical records of 25 patients (17 (68%) female respondents, 8 (32%) male respondents, the age of patients ranged from 28 to 80 years, the average age was 54.5±13.7 years) with a confirmed PN diagnosis, who underwent the PRA procedure of the pudendal nerves. Analysis of the severity of pain syndrome according to visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months after the PRA procedure showed a significant decrease in this indicator (p&lt;0.001). In the early postoperative period (the first 7 days after the operation), there was a statistically significant improvement in the level of patients’ capacity according to Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) by 10–15% in 72% (p=0.042). In the late period of the respondents’ postoperative observation, we also noted a significant improvement in the level of capacity by ODI (p&lt;0.001). The study of the time spent in the respondents’ sitting position showed a statistically significant increase in this indicator from 29±13 minutes to 83±37 minutes 3 months after the PRA procedure of the pudendal nerves and up to 86±41 minutes after 12 months (p&lt;0.001). There were no significant adverse clinical events in the study group of patients. PRA procedure of pudendal nerves is an effective and safe method of minimally invasive surgical treatment of patients with PN. The clinical efficacy of PRA of the pudendal nerves in the long-term period of patients’ postoperative follow-up was 92%.

A retrospective assessment of the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chronic pain caused by advanced knee osteoarthritis.

Patients suffering from severe chronic pain often have problems finding an appropriate combination of painkillers. We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of pulsed radiofrequency ablation (pRFA) of the genicular nerves in 96 patients with knee osteoarthritis (KO). We hypothesized that age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) may influence the quality of the pRFA treatment. A diagnostic blockade with total volume of 9 ml of 1% lidocaine (WZF, Poland) combined with 4 mg of dexamethasone with subsequent pRFA with a radio frequency of 300-500 kHz under ultrasound guidance was used during the procedure. The study participants were assessed during regular monthly visits until 12 months. The nerves' ultrasound identification was successful in 90.62% of the cases. According to the numeric rating scale (NRS), pain was reduced by 50% or more in 64.06% of the cases. The average pain relief period lasted just over 7 and a half months. There were no pRFA-related complications or side effects of the drugs used. pRFA seems to be safe and effective for the treatment of chronic pain in KO. The outcome of the treatment may be related to the patient's age (block duration increased with patient age) and sex (in women, the therapeutic effect was more effectively prolonged) in our study group. There was also higher effectiveness of pRFA in high-BMI patients, which was close to statistical significance ( P = 0.053).

Percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency ablation of articular nerves of the hip joint in patients with chronic hip pain refractory to conventional analgesics.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) may be a risky proposition in patients with comorbidities, and they may require systemic analgesics for chronic hip pain (CHP). Since traditional pain medications may not provide complete pain relief or carry prohibitive adverse effects, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment of the hip articular nerves (HAN) has been proposed for effective clinical outcomes. We determined the efficacy of PRF-HAN in improvement in CHP compared to baseline pain on conventional systemic analgesics. Between August 2015 and December 2021, 31 adult patients with severe comorbid conditions and excruciating chronic hip pain were subjected to a PRF-HAN procedure following a diagnostic block. All 31 patients received PRF of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves. Demographic parameters, numerical rating scale (NRS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), WOMAC scores, the change of these scores from baseline, and any adverse effects were recorded before treatment and on day 1, 1st week, 6 weeks, and 6 months after treatment. All the patients who underwent the PRF-HAN reported a significant improvement in NRS, HHS, and WOMAC scores compared to the baseline values on day 1, at the end of the 1st week, and the 6th week (p<0.001). No adverse events were documented in the study post-procedure until the end of 6 months. PRF-HAN is a strong alternative for chronic pain management and augments physical functioning and a return to daily activity in patients who would be deprived of arthroplasty considering associated comorbid conditions.

Percutaneous Sonoguided Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Managing Pain associated with Trigeminal Neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a sudden, unilateral, recurrent, and intense paroxysmal pain in the region of distribution of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. TN can be effectively treated by minimally invasive techniques such as microvascular decompression, balloon compression, and conventional radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion. The three divisions of the trigeminal nerve can also be individually targeted for pain relief. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is an alternate technique for treating pain along specific branches and has been proven to be a minimally invasive, safe, and effective interventional treatment choice for such patients. A 36-year-old female presented with pain on the left side of the cheek and upper lip part in the infraorbital nerve distribution (V2) and was diagnosed with TN. A neurological examination and magnetic resonance imaging were done. Medical treatment was prescribed initially but showed minimal improvement. Her pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Score. PRF ablation (PRFA) was done using short bursts of radiofrequency for 2 min each cycle with silent phases in between. Adequate pain relief was achieved with no complications postprocedure.

Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation of the Lumbar and Sacral Plexus for Intractable Pain in Pediatric Patients

Severe and persistent pain of cancer and noncancer origin in pediatric patients can pose significant challenge to manage. The application of Radiofrequency ablation in Pediatric patients for pain management is not well reported in the literature. Here, we present pediatric cases where pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment of the Lumbosacral plexus was done for pain relief.