Pulmonary Vein Reconnection Research Articles

Impact of combining ablation index-guided and very high-power short-duration ablation at posterior wall adjacent to esophagus during perioperative period on procedural factors.

The impact of combining ablation index (AI)-guided and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation on procedural factors at the posterior wall near the esophagus is unclear. Atrial fibrillation patients who underwent initial ablation using three-dimensional mapping were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent only AI-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (AI group) and those who underwent vHPSD ablation at the posterior wall adjacent to the esophagus in addition to AI-guided PVI (AI + vHPSD group). Differences in myocardial injury, inflammation, procedural characteristics, and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns were assessed between the two groups. This study included 167 patients (AI group, 83 patients; AI+vHPSD group, 84 patients). No significant differences in high-sensitive troponin I or changes in inflammatory markers between pre- and Postablation were observed in either group. Total application time and total application energy were significantly lower in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (p < 0.001 for both) despite no significant difference in the total number of applications between the groups. The incidence of esophagus temperature ≥40 degrees was significantly lower in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (p = 0.036). However, the incidence of PV reconnections near the esophagus was significantly higher in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (11.9% vs 3.6%, p = 0.046), despite no significant difference in the incidence of PV reconnections overall. The combination of AI-guided PVI and vHPSD adjacent to the esophagus demonstrated reduced application energy requirements and maintained safety and effectiveness during the perioperative period.

HD grid versus circular mapping catheter for assessment of pulmonary vein (pv) reconnections

Abstract Background Traditionally, circular mapping catheters (CMC) have been considered superior to other designs for mapping pulmonary vein reconnections due to the circular shape of the PV ostium. The grid multipolar catheter produces higher definition maps potentially overcoming the disadvantage of being rectangular. Purpose We assessed the acute procedural results, comparing Grid versus CMC in the setting of PV re-isolation to understand if one was superior to the other. Methods In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 169 patients (62% male; median age 66 years [22-83) underwent repeat ablation, between July 2021 and March 2023, for recurrent symptomatic atrial arrhythmias. We undertook two LA maps for patients, utilising the Grid and the CMC. Blinded maps were collected with both catheters, followed by randomisation to one map for analysis and ablation. The primary outcome was the radiofrequency time required to isolate the pulmonary veins. Secondary outcomes include LA mapping time and density for both catheters, ability to identify pulmonary vein sleeves and duration of the ablation procedure. Results 126 patients had PV reconnections. 66 patients (64% male; median age 65 years [22-83]) in the Grid arm and 60 patients (68% male; median age 65.5 years [31-83]) in the CMC arm. There was one pericardial effusion and one TIA. There was no significant difference (p=0.202) found in the RF time required to achieve PV isolation in both Grid (mean RF time 200 ± 232 secs) vs CMC (mean RF time 169 ± 298 secs) arms. There was no significant difference (p=0.407) found between LA mapping time for the CMC (mean 1047 ± 454 seconds) and the Grid (Median 1080 ± 440 seconds). There was no significant difference (p=0.411) found in the total procedure time for the CMC (mean 122.7 minutes) and the HD grid (130 minutes). There were significantly more (p&amp;lt;0.001) PV mapping points identified with the grid (mean 354±213 points) than the CMC (mean 234±154 points) arm. There was no significant difference in PV sleeve reconnections found (p=0.106) between the grid (120 PV sleeve reconnections with a mean 1.4±0.71 reconnections) and the CMC (98 PV sleeve reconnections with a mean 1.52±0.72 reconnections). Both maps were analysed to assess reconnections on opposing catheter arms. The grid identified 20 PV sleeve reconnections not visible on the CMC, whilst 9 were visible on the CMC and not the grid. Conclusion There was no significant difference found in RF time, mapping time and overall procedure time. The Grid identified more reconnections not seen with the CMC and had an overall improved mapping density suggesting that this configuration could be superior for LA mapping.

Clinical findings from a large endo-epicardial atrial arrhythmia ablation registry

Abstract Background Despite advances, catheter ablation success rates for persistent AF remain at 50-60%. The approach for recurrent persistent AF, beyond pulmonary vein isolation, remains contentious. Surgical maze procedures have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to catheter ablation. Catheter-based linear lesions sets have failed to demonstrate efficacy, perhaps due to a lack of consistent transmurality with endocardial radiofrequency. Objective We report our safety and clinical data of an endo-epicardial approach using high-power radiofrequency ablation for atrial arrhythmias. Methods 126 patients (80% male; mean age 65 years [43-81]) underwent redo ablation, between August 2020 and February 2024, for recurrent symptomatic atrial arrhythmias using an endo-epicardial approach. We used a standardised linear lesion set (posterior wall isolation and anterior mitral line) for recurrent persistent AF. Results Utilising an intentional coronary sinus exit and C02 insufflation technique, we achieved epicardial access in 121 anti-coagulated patients. 5 patients were found to have pericardial adhesions, prohibiting access. There were 2 LIMA punctures which were coiled, 2 cases of excess pericardial bleeding (not access related), that settled conservatively, and no surgery or death. 92% of patients received epicardial ablation. 86 anterior mitral lines (95% acute block, 79% with epi ablation), 88 roof lines (92% blocked, 50% with epi ablation) and 81 floor lines (98% blocked, 36% with epi ablation) were undertaken. 106 posterior wall isolations were performed (94% isolated, 51% epi ablation). 75 patients had a standardised lesion set and were included for recurrence analysis. 49 had persistent AF (71% male, mean age 65 years, mean LAVI 38 ml/m2, 26 PVI at baseline and 23 PV reconnections) and 26 longstanding persistent AF (92% male, median age 64 years, mean LAVI 37.1 mls/m2, 16 PVI at baseline and 10 PV reconnections). 82% with persistent AF (median follow up time 11 months) and 38% with longstanding persistent AF (median follow up time 10.1 months) maintained sinus rhythm. The submitted image demonstrates the freedom from persistent AF, for the cohort who are beyond the 3-month blanking period, as per classification of atrial arrhythmia. Conclusion In one the largest cohorts to date, we have shown that endo-epicardial atrial ablation is feasible and safe with epicardial ablation allowing improved transmurality and thus acute linear block. Clinical outcomes, using a posterior wall isolation and anterior mitral line, were favourable for persistent but not longstanding persistent AF.

Advanced mapping and ablation technologies to target pulmonary veins gaps and residual antral potentials during repeat paroxysmal AF ablation: acute and long-term follow-up

Abstract Background A comprehensive understanding of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and residual potentials (RAP) within the antral scar during repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, facilitated by advanced mapping and ablation technologies, is currently lacking. Optimizing radiofrequency (RF) deliveries after failed PV isolation (PVI) may enhance ablation efficiency. Purpose This study aims to assess both the acute and long-term outcomes focusing on PV gaps (PVGs) and RAPs, utilizing advanced mapping and ablation technologies during repeat PV ablation in patients (pts) with paroxysmal AF. Methods Repeat AF-CHARISMA study, a prospective, single-arm cohort study, included consecutive pts from 13 centers undergoing repeat ablation of paroxysmal AF. The Lumipoint (Boston Scientific) map-analysis tool was used sequentially on each PV component. All patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after the procedure. The ablation endpoint was PVI and electrical quiescence in the antral region. Long-term outcome was the recurrence of AT/AF over follow-up. Results One-hundred pts were included (69% after failed RF procedure, 31% after failed cryoablation procedure). A total of 276 PVGs (192 after RF ablation, 2.8±1.8/pt; 84 after cryoablation, 2.7±1.9/pt, p=0.665 vs RF) and 44 RAPs (43 after RF ablation, 0.6±1.1/pt; 1 after cryoablation, 0.03±0.2/pt, p=0.002 vs RF) were detected. In the majority of cases (75%), only PVGs were present whereas, in 21%, both PVGs and RAPs were detected (2 pts had only RAPs). In 2 pts no PVG nor RAP were identified. PVGs were most common at anterior sites (103, 37.3%), followed by posterior sites (75, 27.2%) and carina sites (49, 17.8%). PVG location sites did not differ between prior ablation approach. Only 1 pt after cryoablation showed a RAP (at carina site), whereas the 44 RAPs after RF were fairly distributed across different sites. Acute procedural success was 100%, with all PVs successfully isolated and RAPs completely abolished in all study pts. After the blanking period, over a follow-up of 480±211 days, 18 pts (18%) suffered an AT/AF recurrence (time to recurrence: 245±80 days). Previous ablation approach (HR=0.66, 95%CI: 0.2 to 2.0 for previous cryoablation, p=0.46), number of PVGs (1.05, 0.8 to 1.3, p=0.67) or number of RAPs (0.41, 0.1 to 1.2, p=0.12) were not associated to AT/AF recurrence. No major complications or adverse events occurred. Conclusion A structured ablation workflow for repeat catheter ablation, incorporating consistent high-density mapping and improved diagnostic tools to guide the procedure, demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating paroxysmal AF irrespectively of previous ablation approach. Residual potentials within the antral scar were more frequently detected after RF ablation compared to cryoablation.

Recurrent atrial flutter after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy undergoing repetitive transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy

IntroductionWe described the clinical characteristics of a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) who had undergone transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH) twice and developed atrial flutter after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) due to pulmonary vein reconnection. This case of HOCM is unique because of its complex complications and multiple complex atrial arrhythmias. The treatment of HOCM was successful and the postoperative follow-up results was good.Methods and resultsA 71-year-oldfemale, developed exertional dyspnea with palpitations 12 years ago, with a valid diagnosis of HOCM according to the echocardiography which showed an absolute increase in the interventricular septum thickness (22.8 mm). She underwent two rounds of TASH and only the second round was successful. During a visit due to recurrent palpitations, the patient was diagnosed with AF based on electrocardiographic examination. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) was performed to treat AF. However, the recurrence of atrial flutter was detected on her electrocardiograms (ECGs) three years after the operation. Since the patient had an interstitial lung injury, there were relative contraindications for antiarrhythmic drugs. Due to restrictive use of antiarrhythmic drugs and continuous palpitation, the patient agreed to receive a second radiofrequency ablation. Left-sided macroreentrant circuits were identified via high-density mapping and successful ablation was performed at the isthmus.ConclusionsPerforming catheter ablation and TASH respectively in patients with HOCM associated with AF would be tricky. But taking such a comprehensive and respective clinical treatment would be beneficial to patients in the long term.

Personalized ablation strategies optimize first-pass isolation and minimize pulmonary vein reconnection during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation

Personalized ablation strategies optimize first-pass isolation and minimize pulmonary vein reconnection during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation

Predictors of late recurrence after second catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

BackgroundLittle has been reported on the predictors of late recurrence (LR) after second radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the predictors of LR after second RFCA in patients with persistent AF. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 123 patients who underwent a second RFCA because of LR after the initial RFCA for persistent AF. LR was defined as a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia >3 months after the ablation procedure. The initial RFCA included pulmonary vein isolation alone or pulmonary vein isolation plus cavotricuspid isthmus block. The predictors of LR were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsIn the univariate analysis, elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels, absence of pulmonary vein reconnections at the beginning of the second RFCA, and presence of early recurrence (ER, defined as a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within 3 months) after the second RFCA were associated with LR (P = .025, P = .018, and P < .001, respectively). The multivariate analysis revealed that absence of pulmonary vein reconnections and presence of ER were independent predictors of LR after the second RFCA (P = .004 and P < .001, respectively). ConclusionAbsence of pulmonary vein reconnections and presence of ER were strongly associated with LR after the second RFCA in patients with persistent AF.

P-wave terminal force is related to left pulmonary vein reconnection in patients with atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, noninvasive markers predicting PV reconnection or PV reconnection sites have not been fully elucidated. This study investigated the relationship between the P-wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1) and the PV reconnection or reconnection site in patients with AF recurrence. We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent second AF ablation between April 1, 2018, and June 1, 2023. PTFV1 was investigated before the first AF ablation (pre-ablation PTFV1) and before the second AF ablation (post-ablation PTFV1). In addition, we examined the ratio of the post-ablation to pre-ablation PTFV1 (PTFV1 ratio). These values were compared between patients with and without PV reconnection, with and without left PV (LPV) reconnection, and with and without right PV (RPV) reconnection. The analysis included 56 patients. PTFV1 was reduced because of the first AF ablation. In addition, the values were more decreased in patients without PV reconnection than with PV reconnection. The PTFV1 ratio was significantly smaller in the patients without LPV reconnection than with LPV reconnection; no significant difference was observed between the patients with and without RPV reconnection. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a PTFV1 ratio > 0.69 predicted LPV reconnection with 70.0% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. In conclusion, the PTFV1 ratio may be a noninvasive marker predicting LPV reconnection in patients with AF recurrence.

A case of pulmonary vein reconnection after long‐term success of pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation

A case of pulmonary vein reconnection after long‐term success of pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation with or without left atrial posterior wall isolation: long-term outcomes of the CAPLA trial.

Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is commonly incorporated into catheter ablation (CA) strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in an attempt to improve outcomes. In the CAPLA randomized study, adjunctive PWI did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. Whether additional PWI reduces arrhythmia recurrence over the longer term remains unknown. In this multicenter, international, randomized study patients with persistent AF undergoing index CA using radiofrequency (RF) were randomized to PVI+PWI versus PVI alone. Patients underwent regular follow-up including rhythm monitoring for a minimum of 3 years post CA. AF burden at 3 years post-ablation was evaluated with either 28-day continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring, twice daily single-lead ECG or from cardiac implanted device. Evaluated endpoints included freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a single procedure, AF burden, need for redo catheter ablation, rhythm at last clinical follow-up, healthcare utilisation metrics and AF-related quality of life. 333 of 338 (98.5%) patients (mean age 64.3±9.4 years, 23% female) completed 3-year follow-up, with 169 patients randomized to PVI+PWI and 164 patients to PVI alone. At a median of 3.62 years post-index ablation, freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia occurred in 59 patients (35.5%) randomized to PVI+PWI vs 68 patients (42.1%) randomized to PVI alone (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.88-1.51, p=0.55). Median time to recurrent atrial arrhythmia was 0.53 years (IQR 0.34-1.01 years). Redo ablation was performed in 54 patients (32.0%) in the PVI+PWI group vs 49 patients (29.9%, p=0.68) in the PVI alone group. Pulmonary vein reconnection was present in 54.5% (mean number of reconnected PVs 2.2±0.9) and posterior wall reconnection in 75%. Median AF burden at 3 years was 0% in both groups (IQR 0-0.85% PVI+PWI vs 0-1.43% PVI alone, p=0.49). Sinus rhythm at final clinical follow-up was present in 85.1% with PVI+PWI vs 87.1% with PVI alone (p=0.60). Mean AF Effect On Quality-Of-Life (AFEQT) score at 3 years post-ablation was 88.0±14.8 with PVI+PWI vs 88.9±15.4 with PVI alone (p=0.63). In patients with persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone at index RF catheter ablation did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up. Median AF burden remains low and AF quality of life high at 3 years with either ablation strategy.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of High-power, Short-duration Ablation versus Low-power, Long-duration Ablation Strategy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects around 33 million people worldwide, rendering it a common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has evolved as a leading therapeutic intervention for symptomatic AF. This umbrella review systematically evaluates existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the safety, efficacy, and potential of high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation as an alternative therapy option for AF. A thorough exploration was undertaken across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify pertinent studies for inclusion in this umbrella review. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method was employed to assess the overall certainty of the evidence comprehensively, and the quality of the incorporated reviews was meticulously evaluated through use of the AMSTAR 2 tool, the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In this study, we initially identified 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, narrowing them down to a final selection of 11 studies, which collectively integrated data from 6 randomized controlled trials and 26 observational studies. For primary efficacy outcomes, the HPSD approach led to a non-significant decrease in the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.12; I 2 = 90%; P = .31) and a significantly reduced risk of AF recurrence (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.67; I 2 = 0%; P < .00001) compared to the low-power, long-duration (LPLD) approach. In terms of primary safety outcomes, the HPSD approach significantly reduced the risk of esophageal thermal injury (ETI) (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; I 2 = 0%; P < .00001) and facilitated a non-significant decrease in the risk of other major complications (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.03; I 2 = 0%; P = .10). In conclusion, HPSD therapy is safer and more effective than LPLD therapy, facilitating decreased AF recurrence rates along with reductions in ETI, total procedure duration, ablation number, ablation time, fluoroscopy time, and acute pulmonary vein reconnection.

Ablation Parameters Predicting Pulmonary Vein Reconnection after Very High-Power Short-Duration Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Recurrences due to discontinuity in ablation lines are substantial after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. Data are scarce regarding the durability predictors for very high-power short-duration (vHPSD, 90 W/4 s) ablation. A total of 20 patients were enrolled, who underwent 90 W PVI and a mandatory remapping procedure at 3 months. First-pass isolation (FPI) gaps, and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) sites were identified at the index procedure; and chronic PVR sites were identified at the repeated procedure. We analyzed parameters of ablation points (n = 1357), and evaluated their roles in predicting a composite endpoint of FPI gaps, acute and chronic PVR. In total, 45 initial ablation points corresponding to gaps in the ablation lines were analyzed. Parameters associated with gaps were interlesion distance (ILD), baseline generator impedance, mean current, total charge, and loss of catheter-tissue contact. The optimal ILD cut-off for predicting gaps was 3.5 mm anteriorly, and 4 mm posteriorly. Biophysical characteristics dependent on generator impedance could affect the efficacy of vHPSD PVI. The use of smaller ILDs is required for effective and durable PVI with vHPSD compared to the consensus targets with lower power ablation, and lower ILDs for anterior applications seem necessary compared to posterior points.

Local impedance drop-guided versus lesion size index-guided pulmonary vein isolation.

Local tissue impedance drop (LID) and lesion size index (LSI) technologies are valuable for predicting effective lesion formation. This study compares the acute and long-term efficacy of LID-guided versus LSI-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation treatment. We retrospectively analyzed two patient groups undergoing radiofrequency PVI. In the LID-guided group (n = 35), ablation was performed without contact force monitoring, stopping at the LID plateau (target LID 12 Ohm posterior, 16 Ohm anterior). In the LSI-guided group (n = 31), ablation used contact force information with target LSI (5 anterior, 4 posterior). Both groups utilized a power of 40 W anterior and 30 W posterior, with < 6mm inter-lesion distance. Gap mapping and touch-up ablation were done if necessary. PVI was achieved with a significantly shorter ablation time in the LSI-guided group (25min [21;31] vs 30 [27;35], p = 0.035). PV gaps were more frequent in the LID-guided group (74% vs 42%, p = 0.016). Over 11.5 ± 2.9months follow-up, arrhythmia recurrence was higher in the LID-guided group (34.3% vs 16.1%, p = 0.037). A redo procedure performed in 10 (28.6%) patients in the LID-guided group and 3 (9.7%) in the LSI-guided group showed chronic PV reconnections in 7 out of 10 (70%) and 2 out of 3 (67%) patients, respectively. LSI-guided ablation results in shorter ablation time and fewer PV gaps compared to LID-guided ablation. Despite initial success, LID-guided ablation had higher arrhythmia recurrence and PV reconnections during long-term follow-up compared to LSI-guided ablation.

Pulmonary vein reconnection and repeat ablation characteristics following cryoballoon-compared to radiofrequency-based pulmonary vein isolation.

Despite advances in efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PVI remains common. PV-reconnection is the main finding during repeat PVI procedures performed to treat recurrent AF. To analyze pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns during repeat ablation procedures in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing radio frequency or cryoballoon-based PVI. Retrospective analysis of PV-reconnection patterns and analysis of re-ablation strategies in consecutive index RF- and CB-based PVI and their respective re-ablation procedures during concomitant usage of both energy sources at a single high-volume center in Germany. A total of 610 first (06/2015-10/2022) and 133 s (01/2016-11/2022) repeat ablation procedures after 363 (60%) RF- and 247 (40%) CB-based index PVIs between 01/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed. PV-reconnection was found in 509/610 (83%) patients at first and 74/133 (56%) patients at second repeat procedure. 465 of 968 (48%) initially via CB isolated PVs were reconnected at first re-ablation but 796 of 1422 initially RF-isolated PV (56%) were reconnected (OR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.62-0.86]; p < .001). This was driven by fewer reconnections of the left PVs (LSPV: OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.42-0.86]; p = .005 and LSPV: 0.67 [0.47-0.95]; p = .026). PV-reconnection was more likely after longer, RF-based index PVI and in older females. Repeat procedures were shorter after CB-compared to after RF-PVI. Reconnection remains the most common reason for repeat AF ablation procedures after PVI. Our data suggest to preferentially use of the cryoballoon during index PVI, especially in older women.

Pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation vs. high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up (PRIORI study).

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, non-thermal, cardiac tissue-selective ablation modality. To date, radiofrequency (RF)-guided high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation represents the gold standard besides cryo-ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This single-centre, retrospective study investigated the efficacy of PFA-PVI vs. HPSD-RF PVI in terms of single-procedure arrhythmia-free outcome and safety in a real-world setting. Consecutive, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent PVI using PFA or HPSD-RF were enrolled. In group PFA, PVI was performed using a pentaspline PFA catheter. The ablation procedure in group HPSD-RF was performed with RF energy (45 W, ablation index). A total of 410 patients (group PFA, 201; group HPSD-RF, 209) were included. There was no difference between both groups regarding age, gender, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. The procedure time was significantly shorter in group PFA [61 (44-103) vs. 125 (105-143) min; P < 0.001]; fluoroscopy time and dose area product were significantly higher in group PFA [16 (13-20) vs. 4 (2-5) min; P < 0.01 and 412 (270-739) vs. 129 (58-265) μGym2; P < 0.01]. The overall complication rates were 2.9% in group PFA and 6.2% in group HPSD (P = 0.158). There was one fatal stroke in the PFA group. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 85% with PFA and 79% with HPSD-RF (log-rank P = 0.160). In 56 repeat ablation procedures, the PV reconnection rate was 30% after PFA and 38% after HPSD-RF (P = 0.372). Both PFA and HPSD-RF were highly efficient and effective in achieving PVI in paroxysmal AF patients. The arrhythmia-free survival is comparable. The PV reconnection rate was not different.

Efficacy and Safety of Laser Balloon Versus Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation as Initial Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.

Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) and, although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the standard treatment for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), it is complex and time-consuming. Laser balloon ablation (LBA) has been introduced to simplify the conventional RFA; however, results of studies comparing LBA and RFA remain controversial. As such, this investigation aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of LBA versus RFA. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary endpoints were the freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) and procedure-related complications. Twelve studies including 1274 subjects were included. LBA and RFA yielded similar rates of freedom from ATA (72.5% vs. 68.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.7, p = 0.11) and procedure-related complications (7.7% vs. 6.5%, OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.72-1.90, p = 0.536). LBA with the second- and third-generation laser balloons (LB2/3) yielded remarkably higher rates of freedom from ATA than RFA using contact-force technology (RFA-CF) (OR = 1.91, p = 0.013). Significantly lower pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection rates (OR = 0.51, p = 0.021), but higher phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) rates (OR = 3.42, p = 0.023) were observed in the LBA group. LBA had comparable procedure (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 8.43 min, p = 0.337) and fluoroscopy times (WMD = 3.09 min, p = 0.174), but a longer ablation time (WMD = 12.57 min, p = 0.00) than those for RFA. LBA and RFA treatments were comparable in terms of freedom from ATA and postprocedural complications in patients with AF. Compared with RFA, LBA was associated with significantly lower PV reconnection rates, but a higher incidence of PNP and longer ablation time.

Pulmonary vein isolation durability in patients undergoing very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation

Abstract Background The very high-power short-duration (90W for 4 s) temperature-controlled ablation (vHPSD) improves the efficiency of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation procedures. However, atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences directly related to PV reconnections are still a concern. Purpose The purpose of the current study was to assess PV lesion durability in patients undergoing a reablation procedure. Methods From September 2020 to July 2023, 327 patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF underwent first ablation aiming at PVI using vHPSD. During a mean follow-up of 25±11 months, 48 patients (14.7%) had an AF recurrence. Patients with reablation procedures were retrospectively consented and enrolled. Results Eighteen patients were included in this study. A PV reconnection was observed in 15/72 (21%) PVs, with a mean number of reconnected PV per patient of 0.8 ±0.7. In 7 patients no PV reconnection was observed, one PV reconnected was observed in 9 patients and 2 PVs in 3 patients. A PV reconnection was observed in 8/18 (44%) left superior PV, 1/18 (6%) left inferior PV, 3/18 (17%) right superior PV, and 3/18 (17%) right inferior PV (p=0.03). Conclusions PV isolation performed with vHPSD is highly effective and is associated with a low rate of late PV reconnection. A higher percentage of PV reconnection was observed in the left superior PV.

Adherence to CLOSE protocol, high-power and low baseline generator impedance predicts durable pulmonary vein isolation

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is predominantly attributed to pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR). Predictors of AF recurrence were widely studied. However, data are scarce on the procedural parameters that predict chronic PVR. Aims to study the PVR rates and the predictors of PVR after initial PVI procedure. Methods We included 100 consecutive patients who underwent repeated ablation due to AF recurrence after initial PVI with the CARTO system, both procedures performed between 2018 and 2023. Results The mean age of the patients was 60 ± 12 years, 36% were female, and 44% had persistent AF. Thirty-eight patients underwent initial CLOSE-guided, and sixty-two underwent initial non-CLOSE PVI. Repeat procedure was performed 21 ± 14 months after the initial procedure. In total, PVR was found in 192 of 373 PVs (51.5%) and all PVs were isolated in 17/100 (17%) patients. Factors associated with all PVs being isolated were adherence to the CLOSE protocol (39.5% vs. 3.5%, p &amp;lt; 0.0001), higher delivered mean power (37.5W vs 30W, p = 0.027), presence of first-pass isolation (88.2% vs 40.4%, p = 0.0007), and lower baseline generator impedance (127.6 vs 136.6 Ω, p = 0.0027; respectively). Baseline generator impedance &amp;gt;130 Ω (AUC = 0.7403, sensitivity: 77.1%, specificity: 68.8%, p = 0.0032) was associated with significantly higher probability of PVR (OR = 6.757; p &amp;lt; 0.0001). Conclusions Our findings indicate that adherence to the CLOSE protocol, higher power setting, first-pass isolation, and baseline generator impedance &amp;lt;130 Ω during AF ablation improves the durability of PVI and reduces the incidence of PVR.

Characterisation of ablation strategies at redo catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and predictors of arrhythmia recurrence: results from the AFREDO registry

Abstract Background Patients who have undergone prior pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) often require a repeat ablation for AF recurrence. The optimal ablative strategy for the redo procedure and predictors of AF recurrence thereafter remain largely unknown. Purpose We aimed to characterise the ablation strategies applied at re-PVI and identify possible predictors of AF recurrence. Methods Our single-centre, retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent first redo PVI at our centre from 2017 to 2022. Inclusion criteria required at least one available follow-up visit within the first 12 months after the redo procedure. Ablation strategies of the initial and redo procedure were captured. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to illustrate time of AF recurrence, as classified by predictors of outcome determined by multivariable regression analyses. Results We included 215 patients (39.1% female) with a median age of 66.6 years (IQR 58.6-73.2) at the time of redo procedure. The initial PVI was cryoablation in 39.9%, RFA in 57.7% and surgical ablation in 2.4%. After the initial procedure, 55.8% had paroxysmal AF and 44.2% had persistent AF. At the redo procedure, 25.1% of patients were found to have no PV reconnection, whereas 20.5% had a single reconnected PV, and 54.4% had two or more reconnected PVs. A left-sided flutter ablation was performed in 18.8%, a left atrial (LA) roof line in 16.9%, a posterior mitral isthmus line in 5.2%, an anterior mitral isthmus line in 27.9%, and a posterior box lesion in 8.4%. Overall, 34.4% of patients showed areas of low-voltages in the redo procedure. Patients with areas of low voltages were less likely to have any reconnected PVs in the redo-procedure (p&amp;lt;0.001). After the second ablation procedure, 54.0% experienced AF recurrence. Univariable regression analysis revealed moderate (p=0.006) or severe (p= 0.015) LA dilatation, persistent AF (p=0.005), and posterior LA low voltage areas (p=0.011) as significant predictors of AF recurrence after the redo procedure. The number of reconnected PVs at the re-PVI did not predict AF recurrence (p=0.1090). As illustrated in Fig. 1 and 2, patients with paroxysmal AF experienced less AF recurrence compared to those with persistent AF (log-rank p=0.0025). Moreover, moderate or severe LA dilatation at baseline was associated with more frequent AF recurrences (log-rank p=0.0279). Conclusion A significant proportion of patients undergoing re-PVI experienced AF recurrence. We found that persistent AF and moderate or severe LA enlargement emerged as significant predictors of AF recurrence after the redo procedure. Although PV reconnection was observed in more than two thirds of patients at the re-PVI, it did not predict AF recurrence thereafter. However, patients without PV reconnection had significantly more low-voltage areas, which may be indicative of a different AF recurrence mechanism in this subgroup.Figure 1:Type of AFFigure 2:LA dilatation

Intra-procedural three-dimensional rotational angiography in cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation - results from a randomised clinical trial

Abstract Introduction There are a variety of approaches for pre-procedural imaging to facilitate atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Intra-procedural three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) is the least employed method and it can be advantageous regarding efficiency and procedural logistics (1). There is an open question whether LA imaging could improve safety and outcomes of cryoballoon (CB) ablation. Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate possible benefits of 3DRA for procedural success, safety and long-term outcomes of CB ablation. Methods We designed a single-centre unblinded randomised clinical trial and recruited 134 patients (64.2% male, 59.0±11.6 years) with paroxysmal (93.3%) and early-persistent AF. Patients were randomised to no imaging or 3DRA which was performed intra-procedurally after trans-septal puncture. Angiographic images were segmented and overlaid to the fluoroscopy screen to guide the ablation procedure. Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits and twenty-four hour ECG recordings at 3, 6 and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Results Of all the patients recruited, 66 (49.3%) were randomised to 3DRA and angiography was successfully performed in all but one patient (1.5%). Procedure time was significantly longer when 3DRA was performed (86.7±27.8 min compared to 67.2±22.1 in non-3DRA group, p&amp;lt;0.001). Total radiation dose (447.4±485.0 vs. 133.9±166.2 mGy, p&amp;lt;0.001) and contrast administration (131.8±28.3 vs. 40.8±26.5 ml, p&amp;lt;0.001) were significantly higher in the 3DRA group (Table 1). In patients who received no imaging one pulmonary vein (PV) couldn’t be isolated in 2 patients while this occurred in 3 patients in the 3DRA group (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.25-9.72). Only minor complications were reported in both groups. Five patients developed large haematoma (4 in the 3DRA group vs. 1 in the control group). In each group there were 3 incidents of impending or transient phrenic nerve palsy. During 12 months of follow-up, 88.2% of patients in the control group and 81.8% in the 3DRA group were free of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.63-4.38). Two patients from the control group developed atrial flutter and were treated by ablation. In total, 10 patients underwent redo procedures (7 in the control and 3 in the 3DRA group respectively) and PV reconnections were detected in 9 cases. Conclusion 3DRA is a safe and efficient intra-procedural imaging method to guide CB ablation of AF. However, it significantly increases procedure duration, total radiation dose and contrast expenditure. In our trial it did not have any impact on the acute success rate of PV isolation or freedom from atrial fibrillation during 12-month follow-up.