Percutaneous pulmonary valve insertion has been recently introduced in clinical setting. Patient selection is widely accepted. These candidates are however heterogeneous, in regard of heart defects, and type of surgical right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction. It is presently unclear in the literature if type of surgical reconstruction matters for the success of the pulmonary valve insertion. Our goal was to compare the hemodynamic results of percutaneous pulmonary valve in patients with homografts, prosthetic conduit or RVOT reconstructed with patch. We reviewed patients included over the last 6 months in the prospective study (REVALV) for patients undergoing RVOT intervention for severe stenosis and/or insufficiency. Only valved stent group is analyzed here. All patients undergoing valved stent implantation are previously pre-stented with a bare metal stent according to present recommendations. Thirty-seven patients were included, distributed in three groups according to type of RVOT reconstruction (homograft REVALV is a multicentric prospective study for patients undergoing RVOT intervention for severe stenosis and/or insufficiency. Patients are distributed in three groups according to type of RVOT reconstruction (homograft, n = 10; prosthetic conduit, n = 20; RVOT enlargement by patch, n = 7). Overall, all groups were similar in RV to AP gradient improvement (after pre-stenting mean 30,79 vs 28 p = NS; final result mean 23,71 vs 28,17, p = NS), RV to aorta pressures ratio (after pre-stenting 0,187 vs 0,3117 p = NS; final result man 0,315 vs 0,317, p = NS). If considering non-extensible synthetic tubes we observe that RV-to-AP improvement is significantly worst to the rest of the group (mean 7,07 vs 0,17, p = 0,005). When focusing on outflow tract diameter, results did not differ in homograft group and patch group. In contrast, diameter did play a role in those patients having a synthetic tube, with a cut-off at 20 mm diameter. Below 20 mm, relieve of outflow tract gradient was significantly worse than for bigger conduits. Pulmonary valve insertion is efficient in all type of RVOT reconstruction at least in the short term. The diameter of the conduits did not play a role in RVOT obstruction relief as long as surgical substrates are homografts or patch enlargement. In patients with prosthetic conduits, size matters. In non-extensible synthetic tubes results are worst. Reduced distensibility and progressive diameter reduction may lead to not consider these patients as good candidates for this procedure.