Pulmonary Thromboembolic Disease Research Articles

Do Hemodynamic Definitions of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Distinguish Between Distinct Phenotypes of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is defined by chronic organized thrombi in the pulmonary circulation without or with pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The current definition of CTEPH has adopted lower mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) thresholds. Our aim was to identify its impact on the characterization of patients with CTEPD. All consecutive CTEPD patients referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in a PH center were divided into four groups based on pulmonary haemodynamics. Group A: mPAP≤20 mmHg, Group B: mPAP>20 mmHg with PVR>2 and ≤3 WU, Group C: mPAP>20 mmHg with PVR>3 WU, Group D: mPAP>20 mmHg with PVR<2 WU (''unclassified''). We compared CPET, CT pulmonary angiography, and MRI data across the groups. There was mild aerobic capacity impairment, mild/moderate ventilatory inefficiency, and no significant cardiac limitation on CPET in all groups. However, patients in Groups A and D had better ventilatory efficiency and less oxygen desaturation on exercise due to lower dead-space ventilation. There was no difference in chronic pulmonary emboli burden and distribution, or resting RV function between the groups. Seventeen patients were reclassified as having ''CTEPH'' based on the current definition. No functional deterioration was noted within a median period of 13 months on repeat CPET. CTEPD patients with similar clot burden and RV function without or with mild/moderate PH displayed a similar pattern of cardiopulmonary limitation, except for ventilatory efficiency. The current definition for CTEPH may lead to reclassification of CTEPH in a considerable number of patients.

Not Just CTEPH: A Narrative Review on the Spectrum Approach to Postpulmonary Embolism Conditions.

Three mutually exclusive entities can underlie a postpulmonary embolism syndrome (PPES): not obstructed postpulmonary embolism syndrome (post-PE dyspnea), chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD), and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Cardiorespiratory impairment in CTEPH and CTEPD underlies respiratory and hemodynamic mechanisms, either at rest or at exercise. Gas exchange is affected by the space effect, the increased blood velocity, and, possibly, intracardiac right to left shunts. As for hemodynamic effects, after a period of compensation, the right ventricle dilates and fails, which results in retrograde and anterograde right heart failure. Little is known on the pathophysiology of post-PE dyspnea, which has been reported in highly comorbid with lung and heart diseases, so that a "two-hit" hypothesis can be put forward: it might be caused by the acute myocardial damage caused by pulmonary embolism in the context of preexisting cardiac and/or respiratory diseases. More than one-third of PE survivors develops PPES, with only a small fraction (3-4%) represented by CTEPH. A value of ≈3% is a plausible estimate for the incidence of CTEPD. Growing evidence supports the role of CTEPD as a hemodynamic phenotype intermediate between post-PE dyspnea and CTEPH, but it still remains to be ascertained whether it constantly underlies exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension and if it is a precursor of CTEPH. Further research is needed to improve the understanding and the management of CTEPD and post-PE dyspnea.

Unilateral Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease: Do Patients Benefit From Thromboendarterectomy? Case Series From Three CTEPH Centres

Unilateral Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease: Do Patients Benefit From Thromboendarterectomy? Case Series From Three CTEPH Centres

Phenotypes in pulmonary hypertension.

The clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has guided diagnosis and treatment of patients with PH for several decades. Discoveries relating to underlying mechanisms, pathobiology and responses to treatments for PH have informed the evolution in this clinical classification to describe the heterogeneity in PH phenotypes. In more recent years, advances in imaging, computational science and multi-omic approaches have yielded new insights into potential phenotypes and sub-phenotypes within the existing clinical classification. Identification of novel phenotypes in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with unique molecular profiles, for example, could lead to new precision therapies. Recent phenotyping studies have also identified groups of patients with PAH that more closely resemble patients with left heart disease (group 2 PH) and lung disease (group 3 PH), which has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Within group 2 and group 3 PH, novel phenotypes have emerged that reflect a persistent and severe pulmonary vasculopathy that is associated with worse prognosis but still distinct from PAH. In group 4 PH (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease) and sarcoidosis (group 5 PH), the current approach to patient phenotyping integrates clinical, haemodynamic and imaging characteristics to guide treatment but applications of multi-omic approaches to sub-phenotyping in these areas are sparse. The next iterations of the PH clinical classification are likely to reflect several emerging PH phenotypes and improve the next generation of prognostication tools and clinical trial design, and improve treatment selection in clinical practice.

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease.

Left heart disease (LHD) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH), which may be classified further as isolated post-capillary (ipcPH) or combined post- and pre-capillary PH (cpcPH). The 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension PH-LHD task force reviewed newly reported randomised clinical trials and contemplated novel opportunities for improving outcome. Results from major randomised clinical trials reinforced prior recommendations against the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy in PH-LHD outside of clinical trials, and suggested possible harm. Greater focus on phenotyping was viewed as one general strategy by which to ultimately improve clinical outcomes. This is potentially achievable by individualising ipcPH versus cpcPH diagnosis for patients with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure within a diagnostic grey zone (12-18 mmHg), and through a newly developed PH-LHD staging system. In this model, PH accompanies LHD across four stages (A=at risk, B=structural heart disease, C=symptomatic heart disease, D=advanced), with each stage characterised by progression in clinical characteristics, haemodynamics and potential therapeutic strategies. Along these lines, the task force proposed disaggregating PH-LHD to emphasise specific subtypes for which PH prevalence, pathophysiology and treatment are unique. This includes re-interpreting mitral and aortic valve stenosis through a contemporary lens, and focusing on PH within the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and amyloid cardiomyopathy clinical spectra. Furthermore, appreciating LHD in the profile of PH patients with chronic lung disease and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease is essential. However, engaging LHD patients in clinical research more broadly is likely to require novel methodologies such as pragmatic trials and may benefit from next-generation analytics to interpret results.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a complication of pulmonary embolism and a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension. The pathology is a unique combination of mechanical obstruction due to failure of clot resolution, and a variable degree of microvascular disease, that both contribute to pulmonary vascular resistance. Accordingly, multiple treatments have been developed to target the disease components. However, accurate diagnosis is often delayed. Evaluation includes high-quality imaging modalities, necessary for disease confirmation and for appropriate treatment planning. All patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease, and especially those with pulmonary hypertension, should be referred to expert centres for multidisciplinary team decision on treatment. The first decision remains assessment of operability, and the best improvement in symptoms and survival is achieved by the mechanical therapies, pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty. With the advances in multimodal therapies, excellent outcomes can be achieved with 3-year survival of >90%.

Differential effects of balloon pulmonary angioplasty on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease

BackgroundDecreased diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) is associated with microvascular damage in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an effective treatment for...

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease: Success Rate and Complications among Different Patient Populations.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an effective intervention for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD). We aimed to identify the patient group with a low success rate or high complication rate of BPA, which is still unclear. Both CTEPD patients with or without pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH and NoPH-CTEPD) were included. CTEPH patients were divided into groups with or without pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA-CTEPH and NoPEA-CTEPH). The efficacy and safety of BPA were compared among the groups. There were 450, 66, and 41 sessions in the NoPEA-CTEPH, PEA-CTEPH, and NoPH-CTEPD groups, respectively. The success rate (≥1 degree improvement in flow grade) in the PEA-CTEPH group was 94.5%, significantly lower than that in the NoPEA-CTEPH (97.1%) and NoPH-CTEPD (98.4%) groups (p = 0.014). The percentage of complete flow recovery in treated vessels was also lower in PEA-CTEPH group. BPA-related complication rate in NoPEA-CTEPH, PEA-CTEPH, and NoPH-CTEPD patients was 6.1%, 6.0%, and 0.0%, respectively (p = 0.309). One BPA-related death occurred (solely in NoPEA-CTEPH). Mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥41.5 mm Hg was a predictor of BPA-related complications. NoPEA-CTEPH patients had more improvement in 6-min walk distance (6MWD, 87 ± 93 m NoPEA-CTEPH vs. 40 ± 43 m PEA-CTEPH vs. 18 ± 20 m NoPH-CTEPD, p = 0.012). BPA was safe and effective for all CTEPD groups with less improvement for the PEA-CTEPH and NoPH-CTEPD groups. The success rate of BPA was lower in the PEA-CTEPH group and the complication rate was lower in the NoPH-CTEPD group. Pre-BPA treatment to lower pulmonary artery pressure should not be overlooked in CTEPD patients.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

: While the majority of patients have complete resolution of their acute pulmonary embolism (PE) after an adequate course of anticoagulation, some patients remain symptomatic with evidence of chronic PE. Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease (CTEPD) are terms that describe symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic occlusions of the pulmonary arteries with or without pulmonary hypertension, respectively. Here, we review the definitions, epidemiology, pathobiology, diagnosis and management of CTEPH. The chronic PE in CTEPH is essentially a scar in the pulmonary vasculature and is accompanied by a pulmonary arteriolar vasculopathy. Ventilation-perfusion scanning is the most sensitive screening test for CTEPH, and diagnosis must be confirmed by right heart catheterization (RHC). Treatment decisions require a multidisciplinary team and guidance from additional imaging, usually CT or pulmonary angiography. While pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) to remove the chronic PE surgically is still the first-line treatment for appropriate candidates, there is an expanding role for balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and medical treatment, as well as multimodality treatment approaches that incorporate all of those options. New imaging modalities and treatment strategies hold the promise to improve our care and management of CTEPH patients in the future.

Current surgical management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) with or without pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important potential consequence of venous thromboembolic disease. Untreated CTEPD with pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Several treatment options are now available for patients with CTEPD and CTEPH, including pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty, medical therapyor a combination of therapies. Choice of treatment depends on the location of the thromboembolic disease burden, presence and severity of PH and patient factors, including frailty, parenchymal lung disease and other comorbidities. PEA is a complex surgery that can result in excellent outcomes and resolution of disease, but also comes with the risk of serious perioperative complications. This manuscript examines the history of PEA and its place in Australasia, and reports on outcomes from the main Australasian CTEPH expert centre. It provides a summary of up-to-date guidance on how PEA should be utilised in the overall management of these patients and describes opportunities and challenges for the future diagnosis and management of this disease, particularly in the Australasian setting.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is an uncommon complication of COVID-19: UK national surveillance and observational screening cohort studies.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a well-recognised complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension (CTEPD/CTEPH) are potential life-limiting consequences. At present the burden of CTEPD/CTEPH is unclear and optimal and cost-effective screening strategies yet to be established. We evaluated the CTEPD/CTEPH referral rate to the UK national multidisciplinary team (MDT) during the 2017-2022 period to establish the national incidence of CTEPD/CTEPH potentially attributable to COVID-19-associated PE with historical comparator years. All individual cases of suspected CTEPH were reviewed by the MDT for evidence of associated COVID-19. In a separate multicentre cohort, the risk of developing CTEPH following hospitalisation with COVID-19 was calculated using simple clinical parameters at a median of 5 months post-hospital discharge according to existing risk scores using symptoms, ECG and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. By the second year of the pandemic, CTEPH diagnoses had returned to the pre-pandemic baseline (23.1 versus 27.8 cases per month; p=0.252). Of 334 confirmed CTEPD/CTEPH cases, four (1.2%) patients were identified to have CTEPH potentially associated with COVID-19 PE, and a further three (0.9%) CTEPD without PH. Of 1094 patients (mean age 58 years, 60.4% male) hospitalised with COVID-19 screened across the UK, 11 (1.0%) were at high risk of CTEPH at follow-up, none of whom had a diagnosis of CTEPH made at the national MDT. A priori risk of developing CTEPH following COVID-19-related hospitalisation is low. Simple risk scoring is a potentially effective way of screening patients for further investigation.

A systematic review of the impact of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy on health-related quality of life.

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is the current gold standard treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and is a viable treatment option for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD). The progressive nature of both diseases severely impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across a variety of domains. This systematic review was performed to evaluate the impact of PTE on short- and long-term HRQoL. A literature search was conducted on PubMed for studies matching the eligibility criteria between January 2000 and September 2022. OVID (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, EBSCOhost (EMBASE), and bibliographies of included studies were reviewed. Inclusion of studies was based on predetermined eligibility criteria. Quality appraisal and data tabulation were performed using predetermined forms. Results were synthesized by narrative review. The structure of this systematic review follows the PRISMA guidelines. This systematic review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42022342144). Thirteen studies (2184 patients) were included. Within 3 months post-PTE, HRQoL improved in both CTEPD and CTEPH as measured by disease-specific and generic questionnaires. HRQoL improvements were sustained up to 5 years postoperatively in patients with CTEPH post-PTE. PTE remains the gold standard for treating CTEPH and improving HRQoL. Residual pulmonary hypertension and comorbidities such as COPD and coronary artery disease decrement HRQoL over time. The impact of mPAP and PVR on HRQoL outcomes postoperatively remain ambiguous. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy remains the gold standard for treating CTEPH and has shown to improve HRQoL outcomes at 3-month sustaining improvements up to 5-year postoperatively. Residual pulmonary hypertension and comorbidities hinder HRQoL outcomes post-PTE.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease without pulmonary hypertension.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is beneficial for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) with pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the clinical benefit of BPA for the patients with CTEPD without PH remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of BPA in patients with CTEPD without PH. We retrospectively analyzed the data from 84 CTEPD patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) < 25 mmHg and 39 CTEPD patients with mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg (without PH). Among the 39 patients with CTEPD without PH, 14 underwent BPA (BPA-treated group), and the remaining 25 received no treatment (untreated group). In the patients with CTEPD without PH, BPA led to improvements in symptoms, pulmonary vascular resistance (3.6 ± 1.6 to 2.6 ± 1.1 Wood units, p < 0.001), peak oxygen consumption (16.1 ± 4.0 to 18.8 ± 4.3 mL/kg/min, p = 0.033), minute ventilation versus carbon dioxide production slope (41.4 ± 12.2 to 35.1 ± 6.7, p = 0.026), and mPAP/cardiac output slope (7.0 ± 2.6 to 4.4 ± 2.0 mmHg/L/min, p = 0.004) and facilitated the discontinuation of home oxygenation therapy, with no serious complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the untreated and BPA-treated groups. BPA may be a safe treatment option for the patients with CTEPD without PH that can alleviate symptoms, improve exercise capacity, and facilitate weaning from home oxygen therapy. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Correction to: Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Correction to: Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal hypoxemia in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and nocturnal hypoxemia were known to be present in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), but the difference betweenSDB and nocturnal hypoxemia in patients who have chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) with or without pulmonary hypertension (PH) at rest remains unknown. Patients who had CTEPH (n = 80) or CTEPD without PH (n= 40) and who had undergone sleep studies from July 2020 to October 2022 at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital were enrolled. Nocturnal mean SpO2 (Mean SpO2) <90% was defined as nocturnal hypoxemia, and the percentage of time with a saturation below 90% (T90%) exceeding 10% was used to evaluate the severity of nocturnal hypoxemia. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the difference and potential predictor of SDB or nocturnal hypoxemia between CTEPH and CTEPD without PH. SDB was similarly prevalent in CTEPH and CTEPD without PH (P = 0.104), both characterised by obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Twenty-two patients with CTEPH were diagnosed with nocturnal hypoxemia, whereas only three were diagnosed with CTEPD without PH (P = 0.021). T90% was positively associated with mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with CTEPH and CTEPD without PH (P < 0.001); T90% was also negatively related to cardiac output in these patients. Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, sex and mPAP were all correlated with nocturnal hypoxemia in CTEPH and CTEPD without PH (all P < 0.05). Nocturnal hypoxemia was worse in CTEPD with PH; T90%, but not SDB, was independently correlated with the hemodynamics in CTEPD with or without PH.

(957) - Comparison of CT Scoring in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease (CTED) versus Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)

(957) - Comparison of CT Scoring in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease (CTED) versus Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)

Imaging of Patients Suspected of Having Pulmonary Thrombo-Embolic Disease; The Value of Chest X-Ray Combined with Perfusion Scan

Objective: To determine the value of a recent chest x-ray (done within 24 hours of the perfusion scan) combined with perfusion in diagnosing acute pulmonary thromboembolism in clinical settings. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of 155 consecutive patients clinically suspected with pulmonary thromboembolism between January 2017 and January 2019, who underwent a lung scintigraphy. Results: Most of the study participants (75.5%) were black Africans. The overall population studied had a mean age of 50.09 years (SD 16.78). A recent chest x-ray was found in 40.1% of the projected sample size of 386 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the PISAPED 1 reader were 96% and 97%, respectively, with a NPV and PPV of 99% and 89%. The sensitivity and specificity of the PISAPED 2 reader were both 96%, with a NPV and PPV of 86%and 99%, respectively. The PIOPED II and the PISAPED 1 had an agreement of 88.39% (Kappa value of 0.7348) while the PIOPED II and the PISAPED 2 had an agreement of 88.39% (Kappa value of 0.7444). Conclusion: Chest x-ray in conjunction with perfusion scintigraphy is accurate and can be used where ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy cannot be done in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Post-Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF-S2k Guideline.

In survivors of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the post-PE syndrome (PPES) may occur. In PPES, patients typically present with persisting or progressive dyspnea on exertion despite 3 months of therapeutic anticoagulation. Therefore, a structured follow-up is warranted to identify patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) with normal pulmonary pressure or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Both are currently understood as a dual vasculopathy, that is, secondary arterio- and arteriolopathy, affecting the large and medium-sized pulmonary arteries as well as the peripheral vessels (diameter < 50 µm). The follow-up algorithm after acute PE commences with identification of clinical symptoms and risk factors for CTEPH. If indicated, a stepwise performance of echocardiography, ventilation-perfusion scan (or alternative imaging), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and pulmonary artery catheterization with angiography should follow. CTEPH patients should be treated in a multidisciplinary center with adequate experience in the complex therapeutic options, comprising pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and pharmacological interventions.

Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty continues to gain traction as a treatment option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. Recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on pulmonary hypertension now give balloon pulmonary angioplasty a Class 1 recommendation for inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Not surprisingly, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension centers are rapidly initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs. However, we need a comprehensive, expert consensus document outlining critical concepts, including identifying necessary personnel and expertise, criteria for patient selection, and a standardized approach to preprocedural planning and establishing criteria for evaluating procedural efficacy and safety. Given this lack of standards, the balloon pulmonary angioplasty skill set is learned through peer-to-peer contact and training. This document is a state-of-the-art, comprehensive statement from key thought leaders to address this gap in the current clinical practice of balloon pulmonary angioplasty. We summarize the current status of the procedure and provide a consensus opinion on the role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in the overall care of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. We also identify knowledge gaps, provide guidance for new centers interested in initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs, and highlight future directions and research needs for this emerging therapy.

Multimodality imaging of acute and chronic pulmonary thromboembolic disease.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a pathological entity characterised by venous thromboembolism in the pulmonary arteries. It is a common entity in daily clinical practice and is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. Correct diagnostic work-up is pivotal to ensure timely institution of appropriate therapy. This requires recognition of the characteristic imaging findings and awareness of the role and peculiarities of the different imaging techniques involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic process. This review aims to showcase the most commonly encountered imaging findings associated with pulmonary thromboembolism for each imaging modality, outline their advantages and disadvantages, and define the specific role of these techniques in the clinical setting. The latest innovations concerning the diagnostic work-up of PE will be also briefly discussed, yielding a perspective on the future developments and challenges that the radiologist will have to face in the coming years.