Background: Reconstruction of flexor tendon injury of the hand after failed tendon repair or missed injury is a technically challenging problem. Repair of the tendon within the thin tight pulley system usually invites the formation of adhesion and failure of repair. A combination of a technique described by Paneva-Holevich and Hunter has been used for this problem with variable results. Methods: Twenty-five flexor tendons in 20 patients were reconstructed using a two-stage reconstruction of the flexor tendon injury. The preoperative condition of the finger was evaluated using Boyes and Stark grading modified by Wehbe et al. and all had a poor prognosis. The primary tendon injury was missed in nine patients. Primary tendon repair failed in seven patients and free tendon graft failed in three. One patient had two operative interventions: one failed primary tendon repair and one failed free tendon graft. The dominant hand was affected in (70%) of patients. Results: The average time between the original injury and the first stage operation was 10.6 mo. The mean follow-up after the second stage was 72 mo. The mean strength of pinch grip and power grip were 92.4% and 94.8%, respectively. The mean pulp to distal flexion crease distance was 12.32 mm. According to Buck-Gramcko scoring, excellent results were achieved in 18 fingers (72%), good in five fingers (20%), fair in one (4%), and poor in one (4%). No additional surgery was required after the second stage. Conclusions: The two-stage pedicled flexor digitorum superficialis technique provided a reliable and effective method for reconstruction of failed repair or missed injury of the flexor tendon in the hand in zone II. The modification of the technique presented in this study achieved a high rate of excellent and good results without increasing the rate of complications. Patient compliance is critical for the success of this procedure.
Read full abstract