Puborectalis Syndrome Research Articles

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry: A comparative pilot study with X-ray defaecography

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) is a new technique that can explore anorectal disorders and provide interesting topographic data for the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders such as paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS). Our object was to evaluate whether 3DHRAM can reliably diagnose PPS already diagnosed with X-ray defaecography, which is considered to be the gold standard. All patients being tested in our department for dyschezia by 3D-HRAM and X-ray defecography were eligible for the study. The 3DHRAM results were compared with X-ray defecography. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for various 3DHRAM criteria to propose a diagnostic strategy for PPS. Twenty-three patients presented with PPS on X-ray defaecography. On 3DHRAM, according to our diagnostic strategy, the kappa value was 0.706, with a positive predictive value of 71.88% [95% CI, 53.02-85.60], a specificity of 80.43% [95% CI, 65.62-90.13], a sensibility of 95.83% [95% CI, 76.98-99.78], and area under curve value was 0.922. In this study, 3DHRAM was used to diagnose PPS with the same degree of reliability as X-ray defaecography, and we confirmed its use in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. Further studies will be necessary to define classifications for these new anatomic data from 3DHRAM.

Diagnosis and management of pelvic floor dyssynergia

The term pelvic floor dyssynergia is commonly used interchangeably with the terms anismus, dyssynergic defecation or puborectalis syndrome. Patients with PFD commonly present with chronic constipation. The prevalence among the general population can range from 20-70% and among constipated patients it has been reported as high as 60%. This defecation disorder is basically caused by failure of relaxation or paradoxical contraction of the external anal sphincter and the puborectalis sling during defecation. Although there is no clear pathophysiological cause for this disorder, it has been linked to several factors such as abuse in childhood, poor toilet training, difficult childbirth, previous pelvic surgery or other psychological factors. The correct diagnosis is key to treating PFD and it starts with a thorough history and physical exam including a well performed digital rectal examination. Appropriate investigations following the initial visit can help to confirm the diagnosis and then treatment is prescribed accordingly. The patient should understand the nature of her constipation problem and participate fully in the management. The treatment is mainly conservative with diet, biofeedback and physiotherapy as the cornerstones of management. A multidisciplinary team approach will help for successful management of the patient. Surgery is normally not necessary for these patients and is only performed in extremely difficult refractory cases. By taking the time to make the correct diagnosis, patients with PFD can avoid frustration, unnecessary testing and surgery.

Clinical and manometric characteristics of women with paradoxical puborectalis syndrome.

A subset of patients with functional defecation disorders have predominance of the puborectalis muscle (PRM) on three-dimensional high definition anorectal manometry (HDARM), known as paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS). The aim of this study was to assess clinical and manometric differences between patients with and without PPS. A total of 227 women with functional defecation disorders undergoing HDARM between December 2012 and October 2016 at a single center were included in this study. All completed the Rome III constipation module and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20). Eighty-seven out of 227 women had a 3D pressure topographic profile consistent with PPS. They had higher mean PDFI-20 scores for straining and incomplete evacuation symptoms than those without PPS. In addition, they demonstrated higher mean resting anal pressure, a more negative mean anorectal pressure differential, and a greater proportion with prolonged balloon expulsion test. These findings were more pronounced in a subgroup of 58 PPS patients with a distinct pattern of both posterior and posterolateral wall indentation. Among female patients with functional defecation disorders, those with PPS demonstrated clinical and manometric differences compared to those without PPS. These differences may be driven by predominant posterolateral wall indentation in a subgroup of PPS patients.

Can we correlate pelvic floor dysfunction severity on MR defecography with patient-reported symptom severity?

MR defecography (MRD) is an alternative to conventional defecography (CD) which allows for dynamic visualisation of the pelvic floor. The aim of this study was to assess whether MRI features indicative of pelvic floor dysfunction correlated with patient-reported symptom severity. MR proctograms were matched to a prospectively-maintained functional database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using pre-treatment questionnaire responses to the Birmingham Bowel, Bladder and Urinary Symptom Questionnaire (BBUSQ), Wexner Incontinence Score (WIS), and modified Obstructed Defecation Symptom (ODS) Score. 302 MRI proctograms were performed between January 2012 and April 2015. 170 patients were included. Patients with a rectocele > 2 cm (p = 0.003; OR 5.756) or MRD features suggestive of puborectalis syndrome (p = 0.025; OR 8.602) were more likely to report a higher ODS score on multivariate analysis. Lack of rectal evacuation was negatively associated with an abnormal WIS (p = 0.007; OR 0.228). Age > 50 (p = 0.027, OR 2.204) and a history of pelvic floor surgery (p = 0.042, OR 0.359) were correlated with an abnormal BBUSQ incontinence score. Lack of rectal evacuation (p = 0.027, OR 3.602) was associated with an abnormal BBUSQ constipation score. Age > 50 (p = 0.07, OR 0.156) and the presence of rectoanal intussusception (p = 0.010, OR 0.138) were associated with an abnormal BBUSQ evacuation score. Whilst MRD is a useful tool in aiding multidisciplinary decision making, overall, it is poorly correlated with patient-reported symptom severity, and treatment decisions should not rest solely on results.

Paradoxical puborectalis syndrome on diffusion-weighted imaging: a retrospective study of 72 cases

This study aimed to evaluate the application value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS) in patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS). The medical records of 72 ODS patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR)-DWI and MR-defecography were retrospectively reviewed. The differences in the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and the thickness of the right and left branches of the puborectalis muscles between the PPS(+) and PPS(−) groups were compared. In addition, the absolute within-patient differences between the right and left branches (ADC, thickness) were compared between the two groups. The absolute difference in ADCs (right branch - left branch) was significantly different between the two groups. Regardless of whether the ADC was acquired through single-ROI (0.10 ± 0.08 vs 0.23 ± 0.18, P = 0.000) or multi-ROI (0.16 ± 0.14 vs 0.27 ± 0.17, P = 0.009) analysis, the PPS(+) patients displayed a lower absolute ADC difference than did the PPS(−) patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the ADC value, thickness or the absolute difference in thickness between the two groups. These findings suggest that DWI may have value in quantitatively assessing the puborectalis muscle in ODS patients, whereas the value of puborectalis thickness in such aspect needs further study.

An improved surgical procedure for treatment of puborectalis syndrome

An improved surgical procedure for treatment of puborectalis syndrome

High-resolution Anorectal Manometry for Autonomic Dysreflexia in a Patient With Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

A 48-year-old man was referred to the constipation clinic for the evaluation of defecation difficulty. He was diagnosed with incomplete spinal cord injury at the level of C5 3 years ago. On admission, he reported one bowel movement during the previous 7 days. He complained anal pain, anxiety, dyspnea and headache which were developed only during defecation episode. He also presented with pale and cold feet and numbness of lower extremities. Colonoscopy and abdominal computed tomography showed unremarkable findings. Anorectal function tests were performed for the evaluation of difficulty in defecation. He was not able to expel a rectal balloon containing 150 mL of water. Barium defecography showed typical findings suggestive of non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome. Total colon transit time was 68.4 hours. In the high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM; ManoScan, Sierra Scientific Instruments, Los Angeles, CA, USA) examination with balloon expulsion, mean resting anal pressure (69.3 mmHg) was intact but maximum squeezing pressure (95.4 mmHg) was low. During defecation, paradoxical anal contraction with inadequate propulsive force (type II pelvic floor dyssynergia; mean intrarectal pressure 7.1 mmHg, mean residual anal pressure 67.1 mmHg) was noted. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was developed at rectal balloon dilatation of 20 mL. Interestingly, rectal balloon inflation with more than 180 mL of air caused similar difficulties with defecation as well as paradoxical anal contraction (Figure A). In general, there was an increase in anal relaxation with raising degree of rectal inflation in a constipated patient (Figure B). The relief of rectal inflation resulted in the complete resolution of these symptoms. Although these findings are not specific to the autonomic dysfunction, the patient was diagnosed as autonomic dysreflexia (AD) with the help of neurologic consultation. Figure. Effects of rectal distention in high-resolution anorectal manometry in a 48-year-old male with autonomic dysreflexia (A) compared to that in a 48-year-old female (B) without autonomic dysreflexia. During rectal distention, a patient with autonomic dysreflexia ... AD occurs up to 90% of people with upper thoracic (above the neurologic level of T6) and cervical spinal cord injury.1 Although it can be asymptomatic or less severe in a patient with incomplete spinal cord injury,2 the signs and symptoms of AD generally include a sudden increase in blood pressure, altered heart rate (reflex bradycardia), anxiety, blurred vision, headache, flushing and sweating (above the level of injury).3 Bladder and bowel irritations are the most common causes of AD. Gastroenterologists need to be aware of the condition and typical HR-ARM findings compatible with AD.

Conventional videodefecography: Pathologic findings according to gender and age

ObjectivesTo review the most common disorders depicted with conventional videodefecography, and to compare the defecographic abnormalities between symptomatic patients according to their gender and age. MethodsConventional videodefecography studies of 300 patients (24 men, 266 women; mean age – 57.7) performed in a 32-month period were reviewed for the following parameters: anorectal angle, movement of the pelvic floor, intussusceptions, incontinence and rectocele. The results were analyzed using the chi-square test. ResultsNormal findings were observed in 16.7% men and 7.5% women. In women, the most frequent pathological findings were rectocele (62%), descending perineum syndrome (42.8%), intussusceptions (33.8%), incontinence (10.5%), dyskinetic puborectalis syndrome (9.4%) and rectal prolapse (4.5%); in men the most frequent pathology was the dyskinetic puborectalis syndrome (37.5%). This syndrome is more likely in men than in women (p=0.01; OR 5.78); descending perineum syndrome (p=0.027; OR 2.8) is more likely to occur in women.Women with perineal descent younger than 50 years frequently present an increased descent during evacuation (81.8%), while those older than 50 years already have a low pelvic floor during rest (60.3%) (p<0.001; OR 6.8), with little change in evacuation. ConclusionVideodefecographic findings vary with age and gender.

Early recognition of pelvic floor dyssynergia and colorectal assessment in Parkinson's disease associated with bowel dysfunction

Slow colonic transit time (CTT) and pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) are major contributors to constipation in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, no symptom survey yet exists that effectively differentiates the contributing aetiologies. The significance of individual pelvic floor musculature behaviours and their relationship with colorectal dysmotility in constipated patients with PD are still controversial and need further clarification. We aimed to investigate how differentiated constipation-related symptoms of PD patients with constipation may identify constipation groupings and to register the pathophysiological features of the pelvic musculature. Our subjects undertook CTT, defaecography and the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom questionnaire. The pathological aetiologies were categorized as group 1 (slow CTT) and/or group 2 (puborectalis syndrome) and/or group 3 (pubococcygeus syndrome), in accordance with the CTT and defaecography results. Constipation-related symptoms such as incomplete evacuation and defaecation difficulty yielded high post-test probabilities (81% and 88%, respectively) in groups 3 and 2, but a low post-test probability in group 1 (58%). Changes in the anorectal angle and perineum descent during straining were significantly correlated with CTT (r=0.57 and r=0.61, respectively) and with each other (r=0.82). Our findings that neural control of the puborectalis and pubococcygeus, along with colorectal peristalsis, were in a similar state of degeneration is key information that should assist physicians to instigate more effective management for colonic dysmotility or PFD.

Good Post-operative Results Depend on Strict Patient Selection and Strict Operative Procedure

See Article on Page 140-144 Post-operative results are variable. Some rectoceles might be caused by a paradoxical puborectalis contraction leading to an outlet obstruction and to disappointing surgical results [1]. Thus, an anorectal physiologic study including anal sponge (anal plug) electromyography should be performed for excluding non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome [2]. In that case, biofeedback therapy should be applied first. A vital point for a good post-operative result is the tightness (strength) of the reconstructed rectovaginal septum even though long-term post-operative results aredisappointing [3]. A larger decrease in the rectocele diameter means greater strength of the rectovaginal septum.

Clinical Significance of Perineal Descent in Pelvic Outlet Obstruction Diagnosed by using Defecography

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of perineal descent (PD) in pelvic outlet obstruction patients diagnosed by using defecography.MethodsOne hundred thirty-six patients with pelvic outlet obstruction (POO; median age 49 years) had more than one biofeedback session after defecography. Demographic finding, clinical bowel symptoms and anorectal physiological studies were compared for PD at rest and PD with dynamic changes.ResultsAge (r = 0.33; P < 0.001), rectocele diameter (r = 0.31; P < 0.01), symptoms of incontinence (P < 0.05) and number of vaginal deliveries (r = 0.46; P < 0.001) were correlated with increased fixed PD. However, the female gender (P < 0.005), rectal intussusceptions (P < 0.05), negative non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome (P < 0.00005) and rectocele (P < 0.0005) were correlated with increased dynamic PD. Duration of symptoms, number of bowel movements, history of pelvic surgery and difficult defecation were not related with PD. There was no significant correlation between fixed and dynamic PD and success of biofeedback therapy.ConclusionAge, vaginal delivery and diameter of the rectocele are associated with increased fixed PD. Female gender, rectal intussusceptions and a rectocele are correlated with increased dynamic PD. Biofeedback is an effective option for POO regardless of severity of PD.

Diagnosis of Non-relaxing Puborectalis Syndrome by using the Manometric Defecation Index

Purpose: Currently, various tools are used for the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome (NRPRS), one of major causes of chronic constipation. Defecography, electromyography (EMG), balloon expulsion test, and a colon transit time study one examples of such tools, but none can be said to be the most accurate and effective one. A diagnosis is only made when two or more examinations show positive findings simultaneously. The aim of this study is to assess the correlation between EMG and the manometric defecation index (DI), which is a relatively new parameter, for the diagnosis of NRPRS. Methods: Forty-two chronically cornstipated patients without any history of anal or abdominal surgery underwent both anorectal manometric and EMG tests. The manometric defecation index (DI) was defined as the ratio between the peak rectal pressure and the peak anal pressure when the pressures were measured simultaneously during push by the catheter with longitudinally arranged side holes. The ratio of EMG activity was defined as the ratio between the peak amplitude during push and the peak amplitude during rest when EMG activities were measured by using an anal plug electrode. The two variables were compared prospectively, and their correlation was analyzed. Results: The manometric DI and the ratio of EMG activit in 42 patients were 0.80±0.75 and 1.50±0.65, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the two variables was −0.50 (P= 0.001). Conclusions: The manometric DI and the ratio of EMG activit were correlated significantly. Therefore, it can be said that the anorectal manometric test can replace the EMG test for diagnosis of NRPRS, which has less convenient access for most colorectal surgeons.

Image analysis of puborectalis syndrome and its clinical significance

To discuss the clinical value and application range of defecography, CT and MRI in diagnosis of puborectalis syndrome (PRS). The clinical data of 83 PRS patients, including defecography, CT and MRI scanning in pelvic floor resting and defecation at maximum exertion, measurement of anorectal angle (ARA), length and depth of ARA impression and the thickness of the puborectalis muscle, were collected, and compared with those of 56 normal persons. For normal persons, ARA at maximum exertion was more significantly increased than that at resting. In 62 cases with PRS, ARA at maximum exertion was more obviously reduced than that at resting and associated with puborectalis muscle (PRM) impression. In the other 21 cases, ARA showed no changes at either maximum exertion or resting, a little or no excretion of barium appeared and "shelving syndrome" was showed. The cross-sectional images of CT and MRI showed that the puborectalis of PRS patients were thicker than that of normal persons (P<0.01). PRS patients also showed clear pelvic floor muscle, fasciae and peripheral crevice. Defecography, manifested the abnormal function of the puborectalis muscles, is a reliable method for diagnosis of PRS. In the meantime, CT and MRI are able to clearly display the position, growth status and size of the puborectalis muscles as well as its relation with adjacent structures, which provide further understandings on anatomical changes, abnormal adjacent structure and other functional diseases of pelvic floor in PRS patients. Therefore, an appropriate combination of the 3 methods play an important role in the early diagnosis of PRS and guidance for surgical treatment.

Experience with Type A Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Outlet-Type Constipation

Puborectalis syndrome remains a therapeutic challenge for today's physicians. Traditional approaches include use of fiber, laxatives, enemas, biofeedback training, and surgery. These often were tried sequentially and had conflicting or even disappointing results. We investigated the efficacy of injections of botulinum toxin in improving rectal emptying in patients with defecatory disorders involving spastic pelvic-floor muscles. Twenty-four consecutive patients with chronic outlet obstruction constipation resulting from puborectalis syndrome were included in the study. The patients were treated with 60 units of type A botulinum toxin, injected into two sites on either side of the puborectalis muscle under ultrasonographic guidance. At 2 months, evaluation inspection revealed a symptomatic improvement in 19 patients. Anorectal manometry demonstrated decreased tone during straining from 98 +/- 24 to 56 +/- 20 mmHg at a 1-month evaluation (p < 0.01) and 56 +/- 29 mmHg at a 2-month follow-up (p < 0.01). Pressure during straining was lower than resting anal pressure at the same time in all patients. Defecography after the treatment showed improvement in anorectal angle during straining, which increased from 98 +/- 9 degrees to 121 +/- 15 degrees (p < 0.01). Botulinum toxin injections should be considered as a simple therapeutic approach in patients with obstructed defecation. The treatment is safe and effective, especially with the use of the ultrasonographic guidance that accounts for a more precise injection and consequently better long-term results. Otherwise, given the limited effect of the toxin, repeated injections may be necessary to maintain the clinical improvement.

Complications and recurrence after excision of rectal internal mucosal prolapse for obstructed defaecation

Rectal internal mucosal prolapse (RIMP) may cause obstructed defaecation and encouraging short-term results have been reported after its transanal excision. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess both clinical and functional outcome after this procedure alone for patients presenting with evacuatory difficulty. Forty patients (30 females, mean age 54 years), all suffering from obstructed defaecation, underwent RIMP excision at our unit during the last 11 years. RIMP was of first degree in three patients, of second degree in 21, and of third degree in 16 with 28/40 cases (70%) having associated anorectal pathology. The operation was carried out by hand suture (submucosal excision, Sarles endorectal excision, or the Delorme mucosectomy) in 26 patients, by circular stapled prolapsectomy in nine patients, or by combined manual and stapled techniques in five cases. Proctoscopy was carried out after 2 months for all patients, with anorectal manometry in 30 patients. Patients were independently assessed by state-trait anxiety scales for attendant anxiety and depression. Eighteen patients (45%) had significant postoperative complications with a surgical reintervention rate of 32.5%. Overall, 21 patients (52%) reported recurrent constipation and of these 14 (65%) had recurrent RIMP; six patients were treated successfully by rubber-band ligation alone. Two patients (5%) experienced new onset faecal incontinence. The recurrence rate of RIMP was unaffected by the type of operation, being 53% after manual techniques and 48% after combined procedures. There was no difference between postoperative manometric values in patients presenting with recurrent RIMP or constipation compared with those without RIMP or constipation on follow-up. Forty-eight percent of the patients with both recurrent constipation plus RIMP had manometric evidence of non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome compared with 26% with RIMP but without constipation (P<0.05). Ten of the 14 patients (71%) with anxiety and/or depression complained of recurrent constipation after surgery compared with nine of the 26 patients (24%) with normal psychological profiles (P<0.01). Patients with a preoperative rectocele were more likely to suffer from recurrent constipation than those without rectocele (eight out of 15, 53.3% vs. seven out of 25, 28%; P<0.05). Primary excision of RIMP does not seem an effective treatment for obstructed defecation with predictive factors for an adverse outcome in terms of recurrence (RIMP and constipation) including the presence of preoperative non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome and a demonstrated anxiety or depression psychological profile. The technique of prolapsectomy does not seem to affect outcome.

Functional Anorectal Disorders

Functional anorectal disorders include solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, rectocele, nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome, and descending perineal syndrome. Patients usually present with "constipation," but the clinical picture of these disorders includes rectal pain and bleeding, digitalization, incomplete evacuation, and a feeling of obstruction. Diagnosis is difficult because many findings can be seen in normal patients as well. The diagnosis is made by using a combination of clinical picture, defecography, pathology, and occasionally anometry and pudendal terminal motor nerve latency. These disorders are generally treated medically with dietary changes and biofeedback. Surgical intervention is reserved for patients with intractable symptoms and has not been universally successful.

Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice.

In coloproctology, biofeedback has been used for more than 20 years to treat patients with fecal incontinence, constipation, and rectal pain. It can be performed in a number of conditions with minimal risk and discomfort. However, it does require the presence of some degree of sphincter contraction and rectal sensitivity. Biofeedback can be time-consuming and demands motivation. The purpose of this paper is to review the indications, methodology, and results of anorectal biofeedback in the treatment of these disorders. Mean success rates for biofeedback range from 72.3% for fecal incontinence of diverse etiology, 68.5% for constipation attributable to paradoxical puborectalis syndrome, and 41.2% for idiopathic rectal pain. However, criteria to define success vary tremendously among researchers and there is a tendency to indicate biofeedback in a myriad of conditions when other therapeutic options, including surgery, fail or are inappropriate. These factors make comparison of the results difficult and reinforce the need for randomized controlled trials and studies assessing long-term follow-up. In summary, biofeedback is a simple, cost-effective, and morbidity-free technique and remains an attractive option, especially considering the complexity of the functional disorders of the colon, rectum, anus, and pelvic floor.

Clinical applications and techniques of cinedefecography

Background: Cinedefecography is of value in routine examination of functional disorders of the pelvic floor. Interest in this technique has rapidly expanded owing to the increased availability of colorectal physiologic testing and better understanding of the multifactorial pathophysiology involving evacuation disorders. Methods: A summary of the available techniques, methodology, and indications for cinedefecography was undertaken. In addition, information was provided on interpretation of these images particularly in the context of anatomic abnormalities and clinical applications. Results: Cinedefecography can be rapidly and easily performed using standard radiographic equipment. Effective radiation dose is significantly lower than for other intestinal contrast studies. The technique has been found most useful for measurements of perineal descent, puborectalis length, and ascertaining the function of the puborectalis muscle and pelvic floor. Common diagnoses that can be made by this test include nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome, perineal descent, rectocele, enterocele, sigmoidocele, and rectoanal intussusception. Conclusion: Cinedefecography provides a wide range of information to assist the surgeon with the evaluation and management of patients with evacuatory and other associated pelvic floor disorders.

Inter-observer variability in the reporting of dynamic evacuation proctography

To determine the degree of inter-observer variability between two reporters of dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP). The videotapes of 136 patients who had undergone the investigation of DEP in a 1-year period were retrospectively and independently reported by two of the authors. The authors recorded the presence or absence of an anterior rectocoele (as well as size-small, medium or large), an intussusception, a rectal prolapse and any degree of non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome (NRPS). The results were analysed using the κ statistic. I.W.I. reported 18% of the proctograms as normal. S.G.S. reported 26% of the proctograms as normal. κ scores for agreement on the presence or absence of rectal prolapses, NRPS, intussusception and anterior rectocoeles between the two reporters were 0.79, 0.70, 0.54 and 0.82, respectively. Usefulness of an investigation is dependent upon its reproducibility and hence on the degree of inter-observer variability in its reporting. Our study shows that DEP is a useful investigation for delineating the mechanics of the pelvic floor and that consistency of reporting in our Department is good.

Botulinum toxin in the treatment of outlet obstruction constipation caused by puborectalis syndrome.

Puborectalis syndrome has been difficult to treat. We investigated the efficacy of botulinum toxin in treating patients with puborectalis syndrome who had previously failed to respond to electromyographic biofeedback sessions and who refused to use anal dilators. Of a group of 50 patients with chronic outlet obstruction constipation, four patients with puborectalis syndrome were included in the study. The patients were studied using anorectal manometry, defecography, and electromyography and then treated with 30 units of Type A botulinum toxin, injected into two sites on either side of the puborectalis muscle, under ultrasonographic guidance. One patient was lost to follow-up. After treatment in other patients, the frequency of natural bowel movements increased from zero to six per week and laxatives were needed by only one patient. Anorectal manometry demonstrated decreased tone during straining from (mean +/- standard deviation) 96.2 +/- 12 mmHg to 42.5 +/- 13 mmHg at four weeks (P = 0.003) and 63.2 +/- 22 mmHg at eight weeks (P = 0.009). Defecography performed eight weeks after treatment showed improvement in the anorectal angle, which increased from 94 +/- 11 degrees to 114 +/- 13 degrees (P = 0.01), and evacuation of barium paste. Electromyography demonstrated mild paradoxical contraction. However, 16 weeks after treatment one of these three patients suffered symptomatic recurrence. This patient was re-treated with 50 units of toxin; eight months later he required a further 60 units. Seven months after the last injection he reported normal daily bowel movements without the use of laxatives. Botulinum toxin injection should be considered as a simple therapeutic approach in patients with puborectalis syndrome. The use of higher dosage and a more precise method of toxin injections under transrectal ultrasonography account for the long-term higher success rate. However, because the effects of the toxin wear off within three months of administration, repeated injections could be necessary to maintain the clinical improvement.