Public Payer Research Articles

Budget impact analysis of baricitinib for treatment of alopecia areata: A Saudi hospital perspective

ObjectivesTo perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) of the adoption of baricitinib for the management of alopecia areata (AA) by a Saudi public sector payer. MethodsA BIA model was developed to calculate the expected financial impact under two scenarios: the baseline scenario, which reflects the current mix of treatments without baricitinib, and the projected scenario, in which baricitinib is adopted. The model assumed that patients with severe AA and those with mild-to-moderate AA who did not respond to other treatments were eligible for baricitinib treatment. The model input was based on published evidence, expert opinions, and the Saudi Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of AA. ResultsAssuming a hypothetical total eligible population of 368 patients received different AA treatments over the 12-months study period. The aggregated 5-years cost in the baseline scenario was SR 5836616. Upon the introduction of baricitinib as an alternative treatment for severe AA, the projected aggregated budget impact was SR 7569120. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were most sensitive to AA prevalence, percentage of severe AA, and predicted market share for baricitinib over the 5-year time horizon. ConclusionThe addition of baricitinib to formularies is likely to increase the cost impact from a government hospital perspective. However, this addition expands the treatment options for patients with AA and may result in improved outcomes. Future cost-effectiveness analyses are recommended to estimate the cost per incremental improvement in the outcomes.

Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Among Older Adults in Greece

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of vaccination with bivalent respiratory syncytial virus stabilized prefusion F vaccine (RSVpreF) for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Greek adults 60 years of age and older. Methods: A Markov model was adapted to simulate lifetime risk of health and economic outcomes from the public payer’s perspective over a lifetime horizon. Epidemiology, vaccine effectiveness, utilities, and direct medical costs (EUR, 2024) were obtained from published studies, official sources, and local experts. Model outcomes included the number of medically attended RSV cases, stratified by care setting (i.e., hospital, emergency department [ED], outpatient visits [OV]), and attributable RSV-related deaths, costs, life years (LY), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of RSVpreF vaccination compared with no vaccination. Results: The model projected 258,170 hospitalizations, 112,248 ED encounters, 1,201,604 OV, and 25,463 deaths related to RSV in Greek older adults resulting in direct medical costs of EUR 1.6 billion over the lifetime horizon. Assuming RSV vaccination would reach the same coverage rates as pneumococcal and influenza programmes, 18,118 hospitalizations, 7874 ED encounters, 48,079 OV, and 1706 deaths could be prevented over the modelled time horizon. The health benefits associated with RSVpreF contributed to an incremental gain of 10,976 LYs and 7230 QALYs compared with no vaccination. The incremental analysis reported that vaccination with RSVpreF was estimated to be a cost-effective strategy resulting in ICERs of EUR 12,991 per LY gained, EUR 19,723 per QALY gained, and EUR 7870 per hospitalized RSV case avoided compared with no vaccination. Conclusions: Vaccination with RSVpreF was a cost-effective strategy for the prevention of RSV disease in Greek adults over 60 years of age. The introduction of RSV vaccination can improve public health by averting RSV cases and deaths and has the potential to fulfil an unmet medical need.

No reimbursement policy and implantable loop recorders in the real world setting

Abstract Background Prolonged heart rhythm evaluation is indicated in patients with suspected arrhythmias. Routine electrocardiographic Holter monitoring is often associated with poor adherence and may lead to little to no clinically relevant findings. Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are small, subcutaneous cardiac devices providing semi-continuous electrocardiographic recording. Despite strong evidence supporting their effectiveness, ILRs are yet to be fully reimbursed by the National Health Fund- the public insurer in Poland. Purpose We aimed to investigate the feasibility, as well as the diagnostic yield of ILRs in a real world setting of a tertiary cardiovascular center. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients admitted for ILR implantation between March 2013 nad November 2023. Hospitalization and procedural costs were covered by the clinic's statutory and hospital funds and not by the National Health Fund, the public payer. All patients were remotely monitored for device follow-up. Baseline demographic characteristics, as well as data regarding observation period, clinical outcomes and safety were collected. Results Data for 51 ILR implants in 50 patients was assessed. Insertion success rate was 100% on first attempt with no complications. Mean age was 54,43 ±18,56 years old. 52,94% of patients were female. Coronary artery disease was present in 21,57% patients, hypertension in 50,98%, diabetes in 13,73%. The indications for ILR implantation were unexplained syncope (n= 42; 82,35%), palpitations (n= 16; 31,37%), ischemic stroke of unknown origin (n= 6; 11,76%), monitoring of ventricular arrhythmia (n= 2; 3,92%). Mean time between occurrence of first symptoms and ILR implantation was 80,86 ±112,95 months. Mean monitoring period was 1067,62 ±668,89 days. 23 (45,1%) patients had an actionable event detected. Mean time to clinical outcome was 190,34 ±514,85 days. Based on the obtained recordings, in 13 (25,49%) patients a cardiac electronic device was implanted and 6 (11,76%) underwent an electrophysiological procedure. Time to intervention was 435,17 ± 542,9 days and 338,8 ± 273,44 days, respectively. ILR prompted medication modification in 14 (27,45%) patients. Antiarrhythmic drugs were modified in 6 (11,76%) patients. Oral anticoagulation was initiated in 3 (5,88%) patients. Mean time to any pharmacotherapy modification was 654,68 ± 604,32 days. Skin infections occurred in 2 patients, leading to early device removal. Conclusions This is the first study to present a comprehensive evaluation of ILR patients in Poland, along with a substantial observation period. We report a high prevalence of treatable cardiac conditions in patients with previous unsuccessful diagnostic work up. In the light of the upcoming favourable changes in governmental healthcare policy, demonstrating evidence supporting ILR application in everyday clinical practice is crucial for advocating their wider utilization and reimbursement.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Low-Dose Pioglitazone in a Population With Prediabetes and a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Pioglitazone significantly reduces the risk of stroke in people with diabetes, and in those with prediabetes, it markedly reduces the risk of stroke/myocardial infarction and new-onset diabetes. Low-dose pioglitazone provides most of the clinical benefits of high-dose pioglitazone, with fewer adverse effects. We report an economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of low-dose pioglitazone versus placebo from a Canadian public payer perspective in 2023 Canadian dollars. A Markov model was developed at a lifetime horizon with an annual cycle length and 5 health states (event-free, myocardial infarction, stroke, new-onset diabetes, and death). Transition probabilities were extracted from the IRIS (Insulin Resistance Intervention in Stroke) trial. Health state costs and utilities were based on public sources. Annual discount rates of 1.5% were applied in the reference-case analysis. Probabilistic analyses were conducted to deal with parameter uncertainty through 5000 simulations. The costs were estimated as $24 887 (interquartile range [IQR], $14 632-$41507) for low-dose pioglitazone and $57 301 (IQR, $48 730-$67368) for placebo, resulting in a cost saving of -$30 287 (IQR, -$43 374 to -$14 587) in favor of low-dose pioglitazone. Quality-adjusted life years were estimated as 25.99 (IQR, 24.56-26.81) for the low-dose pioglitazone and 19.44 (IQR, 18.68-20.13) for placebo, resulting in a difference of 6.37 (IQR, 5.07-7.36) in favor of low-dose pioglitazone. Consistent findings were observed from scenario analyses and 1-way probability sensitivity analyses. Holding across a wide range of values in modeling parameters, low-dose pioglitazone is found as the dominant strategy versus a placebo.

Cost-utility of nelarabine for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Canada.

The Children's Oncology Group (COG)-AALL0434 trial investigated the addition of nelarabine to the augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (aBFM) protocol in patients (1.0-30.99years) with newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Despite demonstrating superior outcomes, nelarabine is not currently funded by many health systems, in part due to a lack of cost-effectiveness data. We estimated the cost-utility of nelarabine for this indication from a Canadian public healthcare payer perspective. We developed a microsimulation model that followed hypothetical patients with newly diagnosed T-ALL from post-induction therapy to death. Three health states were modeled: relapse-free, post-relapse, and death. Efficacy was estimated using AALL0434 and retrospective data from Ontario, Canada. Costs were obtained from Canadian sources. Utility estimates and long-term mortality risks were sourced from literature. Total healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were reported. Probabilistic and scenario analyses were conducted. Incorporating nelarabine in the aBFM protocol increased costs by $51,670 Canadian dollars per patient, but resulted in 1.97 more QALYs and an ICER of $26,184/QALY. Most of the identified cost and benefit were accrued within the AALL0434 trial period (first 11years post diagnosis) and while patients were in the relapse-free health state. Across multiple scenarios, the ICER was stable under an assumed $50,000/QALY threshold. Incorporating nelarabine into aBFM was cost-effective across different scenarios and assumptions. These results support its funding by public and private payers.

Cost-Effectiveness of Teduglutide for Pediatric Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome in Japan, Including Caregiver Burden.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is associated with a significant mental and physical burden for patients and caregivers. Standard of care (SOC) for SBS includes parenteral support (PS) to optimize intestinal function. Teduglutide, a recombinant human glucagon-like peptide2 analogue, reduces the need for PS in patients with SBS. In this study, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of teduglutide in pediatric patients with SBS from multiple perspectives, considering the caregiver's burden. A Markov model was used to evaluate cost (Japanese yen, JPY) and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) of teduglutide compared with SOC for pediatric patients with SBS in Japan. We conducted a base-case analysis and selected sensitivity and scenario analyses from three perspectives: (1) the public healthcare payer, (2) the public healthcare and long-term care payer, and (3) society. In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 9,533,412 JPY per QALY from the public healthcare payer perspective, 6,335,980 JPY per QALY from the public healthcare and long-term care payer perspective, and 3,510,371 JPY per QALY from the societal perspective. The probability that cost-effectiveness of teduglutide is favorable from a societal perspective was 59.3%. In all scenario analyses, consistent with the base-case analysis, ICERs for teduglutide compared with SOC were different depending on whether caregiver utility and productivity loss were considered. Incorporating the caregiver's burden in the cost-effectiveness analysis of teduglutide for pediatric patients with SBS provided a more comprehensive assessment of the value of teduglutide for patients, their families, and society. This approach enhances our understanding of the overall value of a treatment, especially for diseases with significant caregiver burden.

Introduction of a hexavalent vaccine containing acellular pertussis into the national immunization program for infants in Peru: a cost-consequence analysis of vaccination coverage

BackgroundInfant vaccination coverage rates in Peru have declined in recent years, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Introduction of the fully-liquid diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP)-inactivated polio vaccine (IPV)-hepatitis B (HB)-Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib) in Peru’s infant National Immunization Program may help improve coverage. We evaluated costs and healthcare outcomes, including coverage, of switching from a pentavalent vaccine containing whole-cell pertussis component (DTwP-HB-Hib) plus IPV/oral polio vaccine (IPV/OPV) to the hexavalent vaccine for the primary vaccination scheme (2, 4 and 6 months).MethodsThe analysis was performed over a 5-year period on a cohort of children born in Peru in 2020 (N = 494,595). Four scenarios were considered: the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV scheme (S1); replacing the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV scheme with the hexavalent scheme (S2); expanded delivery of the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV scheme (S3); expanded delivery of the hexavalent scheme (S4). Vaccine coverage and incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) were estimated using Monte Carlo simulations and previous estimates from the literature. Cases of vaccine-preventable diseases were estimated using a Markov model. Logistical and healthcare costs associated with these outcomes were estimated. Impact of key variables (including coverage rates, incidence of ARs and vaccine prices) on costs was evaluated in sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe overall cost from a public health payer perspective associated with the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV vaccine scheme (S1) was estimated at $56,719,350, increasing to $61,324,263 (+ 8.1%), $59,121,545 (+ 4.2%) and $64,872,734 (+ 14.4%) in scenarios S2, S3 and S4, respectively. Compared with the status quo (S1), coverage rates were estimated to increase by 3.1% points with expanded delivery alone, and by 9.4 and 14.3% points, if the hexavalent vaccine is deployed (S2 and S4, respectively). In both scenarios with the hexavalent vaccine (S2 and S4), pertussis cases would also be 5.7% and 8.7% lower, and AR rates would decrease by 32%. The cost per protected child would be reduced when the hexavalent vaccine scheme. Incidence of ARs was an important driver of cost variability in the sensitivity analysis.ConclusionsImplementation of the hexavalent vaccine in Peru’s National Immunization Program has a positive public health cost consequence.

Cost Effectiveness of Sequencing Vedolizumab as First-Line Biologic in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease in Canada: An Analysis Using Real-World Evidence from the EVOLVE Study.

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking biologic indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) in Canada. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of treatment sequencing for UC and CD from a public healthcare payer perspective, leveraging new real-world evidence from the literature and the EVOLVE study, a retrospective chart review. Using separate decision tree/Markov models to assess cost effectiveness for UC and CD, two sequencing approaches were estimated for adult patients (≥ 18years) diagnosed with UC or CD who were biologic-naïve: vedolizumab as first-line biologic followed by anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α versus first-line anti-TNFα followed by vedolizumab. Treatment effectiveness (response and remission), surgery rates, dose escalation and regain of response and safety inputs were estimated from EVOLVE, a retrospective chart review of real-world data, and evidence synthesis from the literature, whereas costs and utilities were estimated from health technology assessment reports, clinical trials, and the literature. Biosimilar costs were used for anti-TNFα. Both models simulated a 5-year time horizon and discounted costs and outcomes at 1.5%. Probabilistic base-case analyses (n=10,000) reported total costs (2023 Canadian dollars) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Several scenario analyses were conducted to explore robustness of results. In UC, vedolizumab as a first-line biologic followed by anti-TNFα resulted in an incremental gain of 0.09 QALYs (2.46 vs. 2.55) and saved $7179 ($134,028 vs. $126,848), making this a dominant strategy compared with first-line anti-TNFα followed by vedolizumab. In CD, use of vedolizumab as a first-line biologic resulted in an incremental gain of 0.04 QALYs (3.35 vs. 3.39) at an incremental cost of $50,631 ($89,850 vs. $140,381) versus first-line anti-TNFα followed by vedolizumab (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,265,775 per QALY). Based on this analysis, sequencing vedolizumab as a first-line biologic prior to anti-TNFα in UC and CD provided additional clinical benefit to patients. In UC, vedolizumab as a first-line biologic also saved healthcare system costs compared with anti-TNFα, whereas in CD, vedolizumab provided incremental benefit at an incremental cost, which was not considered cost effective at a threshold of $50,000/QALY.

Cost-effectiveness of nonavalent vs bivalent HPV vaccine in Polish setting.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a prevalent sexually transmitted infection with significant implications for public health. In Poland, a nationwide vaccination program offers a choice between the 9-valent (9v) and 2-valent (2v) HPV vaccines. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the 9v vs 2v vaccine from the public payer perspective in Poland. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare the public health and economic benefits of using 9v vs 2v vaccine in Poland over 100-year horizon using a previously published deterministic dynamic transmission model. A target population of girls and boys aged 12-13 years was considered. The model was populated with local epidemiological inputs, utilities, and costs, including vaccine and administration costs, as well as costs related to medical procedures for HPV-related diseases. The 9v vaccine reduced the prevalence of HPV infections and HPV-related diseases substantially more than 2v vaccine when both are compared to no vaccination strategy. The total discounted cost savings of using the 9v vaccine instead of 2v, excluding the vaccine costs, amounted to EUR 66 million. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio amounted to 8094 EUR per quality-adjusted life year, much below the official cost-effectiveness threshold in Poland set up at the three times the annual gross domestic product per capita. 9v cost-effectiveness ratio remained unchanged when shorter time-horizons of 20, 40, 60, or 80 years were considered. Using 9v HPV vaccine in Poland is highly cost-effective compared to the 2v vaccine.

INEAS's Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Vemurafenib: Paving the Way for Value-Based Pricing in Tunisia.

The Tunisian Health Technology Assessment (HTA) body, INEAS, conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of vemurafenib in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. The objective of this analysis was to enable the use of value-based pricing as a new approach to price negotiation. This study was part of a broader HTA report that was prepared in response to a joint request from the regulatory authorities and the CNAM, Tunisia's compulsory insurance scheme. Our analysis was based on a probabilistic Markov cohort model that calculated the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with vemurafenib compared to the standard of care from a public payer perspective. The CEA indicated that vemurafenib provides a gain of 0.38 life years (1.78 vs. 1.4) for an incremental cost of USD 101,106.62 from the perspective of the main public payer (CNAM). This study revealed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 163,311.40 USD/QALY and 163,911.46 USD/QALY, respectively, from the CNAM and public health facilities' perspectives. Vemurafenib cannot be considered cost-effective in terms of what has normally been considered a reasonable willingness to pay (WTP) in Tunisia. A significant price reduction would be necessary to bring the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to an acceptable level.

Insurance coverage for AYAs at cancer diagnosis: A claims-based analysis.

105 Background: Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs), aged 15-39, experience unique challenges in cancer care. Frequent health insurance gaps for this population due to age, employment, and living changes hinder effective care and outcome assessments. Uninsured AYAs have lower survival rates, and insurance disparities are notable among Black, Hispanic, and rural patients; however, patterns of enrollment among AYAs have not been well described. Our study examined these patterns using insurance claims data to better inform AYA cancer care and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the Cancer Information and Population Health Resource (CIPHR), a linkage of cancer registry data and private and public payer data in North Carolina, including Medicaid and over 70% of the private insurance market. We included patients aged 15-39 diagnosed with common AYA cancers (leukemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, melanoma, sarcoma, germ cell tumors) from 2003-2019, linked to claims from 2003-2020. We analyzed insurance coverage patterns, comparing continuous enrollment 1) from two months pre-diagnosis to 12 months post-diagnosis and 2) from the month of diagnosis through 12 months. We compared demographics, clinical characteristics, and insurance types across scenarios. Results: The full cancer registry cohort included 21,060 AYAs; 11,024 (52.3%) had no link to Medicaid or private insurance in the year of cancer diagnosis. Continuous enrollment was 4,707 (22.4%) from two months prior through 12 months after, increasing to 5,912 (28.1%) for month of diagnosis through 12 months, particularly among Medicaid beneficiaries (from 10.8% to 15.6% of total cohort). Less restrictive criteria increased representation among Black (from 29.1% to 38.5%) and rural patients (from 25.2% to 33.1%) and those with leukemia (25.2% to 33.8%) and lymphoma (24.0% to 31.0%). Conclusions: AYAs face substantial hurdles with discontinuous insurance coverage around their cancer diagnosis. Claims-based research can characterize cancer care delivery, and use of less restrictive eligibility criteria expands the generalizability of findings to a more diverse cohort of AYAs. Increasing health insurance coverage over time may be due to the Affordable Care Act. Medicaid expansion within our state is likely to further improve access for AYAs. Continued efforts are essential to help AYAs with cancer secure necessary insurance coverage. Characteristics of AYAs by insurance enrollment criteria. Registry Cohort (n = 21,060) Continuous Enrollment –2 mos to 12 mos (n= 4,707) Continuous Enrollment 0 to 12 mos (n = 5,912) Cancer Type Breast 5817 1345 (23.1%) 1754 (30.2%) Sarcoma 1833 429 (23.4%) 532 (29.0%) Lymphoma 4436 1064 (24.0%) 1374 (31.0%) Leukemia 2393 604 (25.2%) 809 (33.8%) Race/Ethnicity Black 3951 1150 (29.1%) 1521 (38.5%) White 14620 3153 (21.6%) 3886 (26.6%) Hispanic 1296 164 (12.7%) 210 (16.2%) Location Urban 16277 Rural 4728 1190 (25.2%) 1565 (33.1%)

Cost-effectiveness of an interactive voice response system for improving retention in care and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among young adults in Uganda

BackgroundNew interventions aimed at increasing access to and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among young people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (YPLHIV) are needed. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the call-for-life interaction voice response tool compared to that of the standard of care (SOC) for promoting treatment adherence and retention in care among YPLHIV in Western Uganda.This cost-effectiveness study used data from a randomized controlled trial and a decision-analytic Markov model to estimate the long-term outcomes and costs of the Call for Life-Interactive Voice Response (CFL-IVR) tool and the usual care from the Ugandan public payer perspective. The model was parameterized using primary data and the literature and adopted a 1-year Markov cycle. The main outcomes were mean annual costs, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in form of cost per DALY averted. The CLF-IVR was deemed cost-effective if the ICER was between 1% and 51% of Uganda’s gross domestic product. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of adjusting parameter values on cost-effectiveness estimates. All costs were reported in 2021 US dollars, and a discount rate of 3% was applied to both costs and outcomes.ResultsThe base case analysis showed that, from the Ugandan public payer perspective, the CLF-IVR led to more mean annual costs ($359 vs. $280) and averted more mean annual DALYs (15.78 vs. 11.09) than the SOC, leading to an ICER of $17 per DALY averted. The base-case results did not change significantly in the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The cost-effectiveness estimates were more responsive to uncertainties surrounding ART duration, viral load suppression rates, and discount rates.ConclusionThe CLF-IVR may be a cost-effective intervention for promoting treatment adherence and retention in care among YPLHIV in Uganda and other low-income settings. Once implemented, similar interventions may lead to greater returns in encouraging adherence to ART and retention in care among YPLHIV and other vulnerable groups, and eventually favorable clinical outcomes.Trial registrationNCT04718974 Registry: clinical Trials.gov https://ichgcp.net/nl/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04718974 (20 Jan 2021).

Economic evaluation of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine regimens for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from U.S. perspective

BackgroundThe cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX as a potential new standard of care for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has yet to be established. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in this indication from the perspective of U.S. public payers.MethodsA partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of U.S. public payers, drawing on baseline patient characteristics and vital clinical data from the NAPOLI-3 trial. Costs and utilities were sourced from publicly accessible databases and literature. A lifetime horizon was applied, with an annual discount rate of 3%. We calculated and compared cumulative costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). To evaluate the model’s robustness, sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses, and subgroup analyses were carried out. Additionally, a price simulation for the costly liposomal irinotecan was conducted to inform the pricing strategy at the given willingness to pay (WTP) threshold.ResultsIn the base-case analysis, NALIRIFOX provided an additional 0.29 QALYs with an ICER of $206,340.69 /QALY compared to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, indicating it is not cost-effective at a $150,000/QALY threshold. Sensitivity analysis showed the model was most sensitive to the costs of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and post-progression care. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 17.66% probability of NALIRIFOX being cost-effective at $150,000/QALY, rising to 47.48% at $200,000/QALY. Pricing simulations suggested NALIRIFOX could become cost-effective at $150,000/QALY if the price of irinotecan liposome drops to $53.24/mg (a 14.8% reduction).ConclusionsNALIRIFOX may not be cost-effective at its current price as a first-line treatment for patients with mPDAC in the long term. The cost of liposomal irinotecan has the greatest impact. It may become cost-effective only if its cost is reduced by 14.8%, with a WTP threshold of $150,000 /QALY.

Program Implementation Strategies Associated With Reduced Acute Care Utilization for Medicaid Beneficiaries in California's Whole Person Care Pilot Program.

Public health care policymakers and payers are increasingly investing in efforts to address patients' health-related social needs (HRSNs) as a strategy for improving health while controlling or reducing costs. However, evidence regarding the implementation and impact of HRSN interventions remains limited. California's Whole Person Care Pilot program (WPC) was a Medicaid Section 1115 waiver demonstration program focused on the provision of care coordination and other services to address eligible beneficiaries' HRSN. In this study, we examine pilot-level variation in impact on acute care utilization and identify factors associated with differential outcomes. The majority of pilots reduced emergency department (ED) visits for enrollees relative to matched controls; however, only four pilots reduced both ED visits and hospitalizations. Coincidence analysis results highlight the importance of cross-sector partnerships, field-based outreach and engagement, and adequate program investment in differentiating pilots that reduced acute care utilization from those that did not.

Genetics Navigator: protocol for a mixed methods randomized controlled trial evaluating a digital platform to deliver genomic services in Canadian pediatric and adult populations

IntroductionGenetic testing is used across medical disciplines leading to unprecedented demand for genetic services. This has resulted in excessive waitlists and unsustainable pressure on the standard model of genetic healthcare....

Telehealth insights from an integrated care system.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telehealth expansion trends as policy makers instituted flexibilities and coverage changes. Federal telehealth flexibilities expire, however, at the end of 2024. To decide whether to extend those flexibilities, policy makers need information about consumer telehealth preferences, impacts of telehealth on care usage and quality, and telehealth accessibility for the full diversity of patients. Research from one of the nation's largest integrated, value-based health systems provides insights. Findings suggest that telehealth utilization has dropped since the peak of the pandemic but remains higher than prepandemic levels. Telehealth appears to be replacing in-person visits rather than leading to more total visits. Patients generally prefer in-person care but many like having the option to use video- and phone-based telehealth, and both video- and phone-based care appear to be helping patients access primary care. An integrated, value-based care approach may assist a diverse range of patients in accessing telehealth services. Action is still needed, however, to ensure that the full diversity of patients can easily access telehealth offerings. Based on experiences within our health system, we recommend that policy makers maintain public and private payer coverage for video- and phone-based telehealth services; encourage well-designed value-based payment models to simplify and expand telehealth access; improve broadband accessibility and broadband and device affordability so that all patients can access telehealth services; and hold digital health to equivalent high standards for care quality, safety, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and health equity as in-person care.

Osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair is more cost-effective than arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair for treatment of young adults with femoroacetabular impingement: A cost-utility analysis based on data from a randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to conduct a cost–utility analysis of osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) from a Canadian public payer perspective. MethodsA Markov model was constructed to compare the lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of the two treatment strategies. The target population was surgical FAI patients aged 36 years. The primary data source was patient-level data from the Femoroacetabular Impingement Randomised Controlled Trial, which evaluated the efficacy of the surgical correction of FAI via arthroscopic osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair in Canada. Long-term data were extrapolated using a generalized gamma model. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, calculated by dividing the difference in costs by the difference in QALYs between osteochondroplasty and lavage, with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to characterize uncertainty of model parameters and assumptions. ResultsOver a lifetime horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, had a greater expected benefit (0.63 QALYs gained per patient) and lower costs ($955.89 saved per patient), as compared with lavage with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the probability of osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, being cost-effective was 90.5% at a commonly used willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY in Canada. Across all one-way sensitivity analyses, osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair remained a cost-effective option. ConclusionOver a lifetime time horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for young adults with FAI. Future research involving real-word data is needed to further validate these findings. Level of evidenceIII.

COST ANALYSIS OF DIRECT ANTERIOR VERSUS DIRECT LATERAL APPROACH FOR OUTPATIENT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

The increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is having a significant impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased interest in outpatient care pathways to reduce resource consumption. This study compared costs between patients who underwent outpatient THA using a Direct Anterior (DA) approach compared to a Direct Lateral (DL) approach to understand the effect of surgical approach on resource use.We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial for DA patients undergoing primary THA. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the trial to a prospective cohort of outpatient DL approach THAs. We recorded all costs including: equipment, length of stay in hospital, and laboratory or other medical tests. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary recording resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, use of pain medications, informal care, productivity losses and out of pocket expenditures.We report costs from both Canadian public health care payer (HCP) and a societal perspective. The HCP perspective includes any direct health costs covered by the publicly funded system. In addition to the health care system costs, the societal perspective also includes additional costs to the patient (e.g. physiotherapy, medication, or assistive devices), as well as any indirect costs such as time off paid employment for patients or caregivers.We included 127 patients in the DA group (66.6 years old) and 51 patients in the DL group (59.4 years old) (p<0.01).There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from both the healthcare payer (DA= 7910.19, DL= 7847.17, p=0.80) and societal perspectives (DA= 14657.21, DL= 14581.21, p=0.96)In patients undergoing a successful outpatient hip replacement, surgical approach does not have an effect on cost from in hospital or societal perspectives.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Versus Originator Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Study Using Real-World Data

ObjectivesMVASI (Amgen) and Zirabev (Pfizer) are 2 of the earliest bevacizumab biosimilars approved for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to confirm and quantify the real-world cost savings and cost-effectiveness of MVASI and Zirabev relative to originator bevacizumab for patients with mCRC. MethodsWe conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, where originator and biosimilar bevacizumab are universally publicly funded. All mCRC patients who received originator bevacizumab between January 2008 and August 2019 or biosimilar bevacizumab between August 2019 and March 2021 were propensity score matched (1:4) to adjust for baseline differences. Total 1-year patient-level costs (CAD) and effects (life years [LY] and quality-adjusted LYs) were calculated from the public health payer’s perspective. Primary outcomes included incremental net monetary benefit and incremental net health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analyses included a subgroup analysis by biosimilar type (MVASI/Zirabev) and a 2-year analysis. ResultsThe matched cohort included 747 biosimilar cases and 2945 comparators. Bevacizumab biosimilars were associated with an incremental cost of −$6379 (95%CI: −9417, −3537) (ie, cost saving) and incremental effect of 0.0 (95% CI: −0.02, 0.02) LY and −0.01 (95% CI: −0.03, 0) quality-adjusted LYs gained. Incremental net monetary benefit and INHB estimates were $6331 (95% CI: 6245, 6417) and 0.127 LY (95% CI: 0.125, 0.128), respectively, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/life year gained, with all estimates indicating the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar bevacizumab. Cost-effectiveness remained consistent across biosimilar brand subgroups and 2-year sensitivity analyses. ConclusionBevacizumab biosimilars demonstrated real-world cost savings while providing similar survival benefit as originator bevacizumab, confirming the initial expectations of their implementation and supporting health system sustainability.

Costs of the COVID-19 vaccination programme: estimates from the West Rand district of South Africa, 2021/2022

BackgroundThe COVID-19 vaccination programme in South Africa was rolled out in February 2021 via five delivery channels- hospitals, primary healthcare (PHC), fixed, temporary, and mobile outreach channels. In this study, we estimated the financial and economic costs of the COVID-19 vaccination programme in the first year of roll out from February 2021 to January 2022 and one month prior, in one district of South Africa, the West Rand district.MethodsFinancial and economic costs were estimated from a public payer’s perspective using top-down and ingredient-based costing approaches. Data were collected on costs incurred at the national level and from the West Rand district. Total cost and cost per COVID-19 vaccine dose were estimated for each of the five delivery channels implemented in the district. In addition, we estimated vaccine delivery costs which we defined as total cost exclusive of vaccine procurement costs.ResultsTotal financial and economic costs were estimated at US$8.5 million and US$12 million, respectively; with a corresponding cost per dose of US$15.31 (financial) and US$21.85 (economic). The two biggest total cost drivers were vaccine procurement which contributed 73% and 51% to total financial and economic costs respectively, and staff time which contributed 10% and 36% to total financial and economic costs, respectively. Total vaccine delivery costs were estimated at US$2.1 million (financial) and US$5.7 million (economic); and the corresponding cost per dose at US$3.84 (financial) and US$10.38 (economic). Vaccine delivery cost per dose (financial/economic) was estimated at US$2.93/12.84 and US$2.45/5.99 in hospitals and PHCs, respectively, and at US$7.34/20.29, US$3.96/11.89 and US$24.81/28.76 in fixed, temporary and mobile outreach sites, respectively. Staff time was the biggest economic cost driver for vaccine delivery in PHCs and hospitals while per diems and staff time were the biggest economic cost drivers for vaccine delivery in the three outreach delivery channels.ConclusionThis study offers insights for budgeting and planning of COVID-19 vaccine delivery in South Africa’s public healthcare system. It also provides input for cost-effectiveness analyses to guide future strategies for maximizing vaccination coverage in the country.