Public Maternity Care Research Articles

Roles of different organizations in implementing patient-reported measures in routine maternity care in Finland

BackgroundThe integration of patient-centered care (PCC) and value-based healthcare (VBHC) principles, emphasizing personalized, responsive care and cost efficiency, is crucial in modern healthcare. Despite advocation from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) for the global adoption of these principles through patient-reported measures (PRMs), their implementation, especially the pregnancy and childbirth (PCB) set, remains limited in maternity care. This study focuses on understanding the optimal organizational entity for integrating standard ICHOM-PCB-PRMs into routine maternity care in Finland. It aims to clarify the distribution of tasks among stakeholders and gather Finnish maternity healthcare professionals’ perspectives on organizational responsibility in PRM collection. The emphasis was on identifying the optimal organizational framework for managing PRMs in maternity care.ResultsA total of 66 maternity healthcare professionals participated in the study, reaching a consensus that public maternity care centers in Finland should be the primary entity responsible for managing PRMs in the maternity sector. Key aspects such as confidence with the role as a mother, maternal confidence with breastfeeding, and satisfaction with the result of care were identified as crucial and should be inquired about in both public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards. The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive and consistent attention to these PRMs across public maternity care centers and hospital maternity settings to ensure holistic and effective maternal care.ConclusionsThe study highlights the central role of public maternity care centers in the collection and management of PRMs within Finnish maternity care, as agreed upon by the professional consensus. It underscores the importance of a consistent and holistic approach to PRM inquiry across different care settings to enhance the quality and effectiveness of maternity care. This finding is crucial for policymakers and healthcare practitioners, suggesting that reinforcing the collaborative efforts between public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards is vital for a patient-centric, efficient healthcare system. Aligning with PCC and VBHC principles, this approach aims to improve healthcare outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women in Finland, emphasizing the need for a unified strategy in managing maternity care.

Early onset neonatal sepsis and its associatited factors: a cross sectional study

BackgroundSepsis is the 3rd leading cause of neonatal mortality in Ethiopia contributing to 16% of neonatal death. In a hospital study, neonatal sepsis was the leading diagnosis at admission and the second leading cause of neonatal death at the neonatal intensive care unit. Among other factors repeated vaginal examination during labor is known to contribute to sepsis in low-income settings. However, there is limited evidence in the Ethiopian setting.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the association between early-onset neonatal sepsis and repeated vaginal examinations.MethodsThe study was conducted at Gandhi Memorial Hospital, a public maternity and newborn care hospital. We followed 672 mother-newborn pairs by phone until 7 days of age to detect clinical sepsis. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Adjusted odds ratio risk (AOR) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to show the strength of associations and variables with p-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.ResultsThe incidence of early-onset neonatal sepsis was found to be 20.83% (95% CI 17.60, 24.00). Having a frequent vaginal examination (four or more times) during labor and delivery, prolonged rupture of membranes, induced labor and gestational age < 37 weeks were strongly associated with the development of early-onset neonatal sepsis, (AOR 2. 69;95 CI: 1.08, 6.70) AOR 5.12(95% CI 1.31, 20.00), AOR of 5.24 (95% CI 1.72, AOR4.34 (95% CI 1.20, 15.68), 16.00), respectively.ConclusionFrequent digital vaginal examination prolonged rupture of membranes, induced labor and gestational age < 37 weeks significantly increases the risk of early onset neonatal sepsis. We also recommend further study using neonatal blood culture to better diagnose early onset neonatal sepsis objectively.

Childbearing Women's Experiences of and Interactions With the Health System in Vietnam: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.

Scholars have long argued that the care experience is shaped by context, and by evolutions in this context. Using Vietnam as a case, we critically interrogate the literature on women's experiences with maternity care to unpack whether and if it engages with the major social, economic, and health system impacts of the Doi Moi reforms in Vietnam and with what consequences for equity. We conducted a critical interpretive synthesis of this literature in light of the social, economic, and health system transformations driven by the Doi Moi reforms. We offer three critiques: (1) an overwhelming focus on public maternity care provision in rural/mountainous regions of Vietnam, (2) a narrow focus on women's ethnic identity, and (3) a misplaced preoccupation with women's limited autonomy and agency. We argue that future research needs to consider the impact of Vietnam's shift towards market-oriented care provision, and the broader societal and health system changes impacting both rural and urban areas, as well as ethnic minority and Kinh majority populations.

Prenatal determinants of anxiety symptoms in middle childhood. Evidence from Growing Up in New Zealand

BackgroundEarly life environments can have long-lasting impacts on future health and wellbeing. Maternal health during pregnancy, including experiencing stress or mood disorders, has been associated with psychopathology in later life. Anxiety disorders are one of the most prevalent mental health conditions, affecting approximately 7 % of children and adolescents globally, with a lifetime prevalence of 15–20 %. Identifying prenatal risk factors can support future and current public health interventions and maternity care. MethodsData were obtained from the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study of child development. Prenatally, mothers provided sociodemographic information as well as data on their mental health, potential teratogens, and lifestyle factors such as supplement intake and exercise levels. At 8-years old, 4922 children self-completed the PROMIS-SF anxiety measure. Bivariate analyses and backward stepwise regression were used to determine the best multivariable model. ResultsSignificant prenatal predictors of anxiety symptoms at 8-years old included elevated maternal depression symptoms, body mass index in the overweight/obese range, exercise patterns, and paracetamol, anti-inflammatory and alcohol intake. LimitationsSample attrition from baseline to 8-year may have affected statistical power. To further untangle the effect of timing and duration of the exposures reported in this study, larger sample sizes would be required. ConclusionsPrenatal mental health and wellbeing was significantly associated with child anxiety symptoms at 8-years of age. This study highlights the importance of supporting expectant mothers' health and wellbeing during pregnancy to ensure children have the best opportunity to have good mental health.

The MOHMQuit (Midwives and Obstetricians Helping Mothers to Quit Smoking) Trial: protocol for a stepped-wedge implementation trial to improve best practice smoking cessation support in public antenatal care services

Smoking during pregnancy is the most important preventable cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet smoking cessation support (SCS) is inconsistently provided. The MOMHQUIT intervention was developed to address this evidence-practice gap, using the Behaviour Change Wheel method by mapping barriers to intervention strategies. MOHMQuit includes systems, leadership and clinician elements. This implementation trial will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MOHMQuit in improving smoking cessation rates in pregnant women in public maternity care services in Australia; test the mechanisms of action of the intervention strategies; and examine implementation outcomes. A stepped-wedge cluster-randomised design will be used. Implementation of MOHMQuit will include reinforcing leadership investment in SCS as a clinical priority, strengthening maternity care clinicians' knowledge, skills, confidence and attitudes towards the provision of SCS, and clinicians' documentation of guideline-recommended SCS provided during antenatal care. Approximately, 4000 women who report smoking during pregnancy will be recruited across nine sites. The intervention and its implementation will be evaluated using a mixed methods approach. The primary outcome will be 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the end of pregnancy, among pregnant smokers, verified by salivary cotinine testing. Continuous data collection from electronic medical records and telephone interviews with postpartum women will occur throughout 32 months of the trial to assess changes in cessation rates reported by women, and SCS documented by clinicians and reported by women. Data collection to assess changes in clinicians' knowledge, skills, confidence and attitudes will occur prior to and immediately after the intervention at each site, and again 6 months later. Questionnaires at 3 months following the intervention, and semi-structured interviews at 6 months with maternity service leaders will explore leaders' perceptions of acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, adaptations and fidelity of delivery of the MOHMQuit intervention. Structural equation modelling will examine causal linkages between the strategies, mediators and outcomes. Cost-effectiveness analyses will also be undertaken. This study will provide evidence of the effectiveness of a multi-level implementation intervention to support policy decisions; and evidence regarding mechanisms of action of the intervention strategies (how the strategies effected outcomes) to support further theoretical developments in implementation science. ACTRN12622000167763, registered February 2nd 2022.

S4 - What women want for the next birth: a content analysis on the wishes for future pregnancy in a national Australia survey (BESt)

Although women in Australia have access to a variety of models of care and birth locations there is not universal access to all choices due to location, State/Territory and cost. Recent data from AIHW found most women (40%) accessed public hospital maternity care that is fragmented in nature. Midwifery continuity of care has been found to reduce interventions in labour, reduce pre-term birth and increase women’s satisfaction however only 15% of women in Australia had care through midwifery group practice and 2% have private midwifery care. An essential aspect to evaluating the impact of maternity models of care is to consider the experiences and attitudes of women who access maternity care. In 2021 The Birth Experience Study (BESt) surveyed women who had birthed in Australia in the previous 5 years to explore a variety of factors contributing to pregnancy, birth and postnatal experiences, including what women would choose if they were to have another pregnancy. To understand the wants and wishes of women when planning a future pregnancy and birth experience in Australia. A qualitative content analysis was undertaken on 6,101 open text responses to the survey question “Would you do anything different if you were to have another baby”. The open-text quotes were analysed using an inductive content analysis where the categories developed from the dataset by a team of experienced and developing research members There were seven main categories, five that focused on what women wanted for their next birth, one where women didn’t want another pregnancy and one where women didn’t wish to make any changes. The largest category ‘I want to be a better advocate for myself’ described how women internalised their previous experience, feeling the need to better advocate for themselves in future to receive the care or experience they deserved.

O36 - Labouring Together: Women’s Experiences of “Getting the Care that I Want and Need” in Maternity Care

Poor collaboration has been identified as detrimental to the safety and experience of maternity care. The Labouring Together study was conducted to explore women's and clinicians' perceptions and experiences of collaboration in maternity care in Victoria, Australia. Underpinned by well-established conceptual theories of collaboration and shared decision-making (SDM), a sequential, mixed-methods, multi-site case study approach was used to explore women’s perceptions and experiences of maternity care in four diverse case studies of public and private hospitals. Women's preferred and experienced role for SDM were quantified using the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) and analysed using chi-square analyses by case and socio-demographic characteristics. In depth interviews were conducted to explore preferences and experiences reported by women. Most women indicated that they preferred an autonomous or collaborative role for SDM, however 24.4% of women reported experiencing a passive decision-making role during their maternity care. Statistically significant differences were identified between the preferences and experiences of decision-making among women who chose private obstetric care compared to public maternity care. The conceptual framework of Getting the Care that I Want and Need emerged from inductive analysis of qualitative data. Impacts upon women’s autonomy over decision-making in maternity care included: access to midwifery models of care, access to relational continuity of care; understanding of the rights of the woman; and models information sharing for risks and benefits of all options and proposed interventions. Bureaucratic style decision-making based upon a dominant discourse of risk avoidance was identified as a major barrier, with power to ultimately veto the woman’s choice The Labouring Together study findings provide evidence to support women to use SDM processes to enable decision-making in maternity care. However, fundamental barriers were identified to hinder collaboration; and shared decision-making with women is not routine practice in Victoria, Australia.

Obstetric Violence Is Prevalent in Routine Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Study of Obstetric Violence and Its Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Sri Lanka's Colombo District.

The phenomenon of obstetric violence has been documented widely in maternity care settings worldwide, with scholars arguing that it is a persistent, common, but preventable impediment to attaining dignified health care. However, gaps remain in understanding local expressions of the phenomenon, associations with other types of violence against women, and implications for women’s trust and confidence in health providers and services. We focused on these issues in this cross-sectional study of 1314 women in Sri Lanka’s Colombo district. Specifically, in this study, we used Sinhalese and Tamil translations of the NorVold Abuse Questionnaire and the Abuse Assessment Screen to measure prevalence of women’s experiences with obstetric violence in maternity care and lifetime and pregnancy-specific domestic violence. Then, the results were interpreted by considering the women’s sociodemographic characteristics, such as age, ethnicity, and family income, to reveal previously undocumented associations between obstetric and domestic violence during pregnancy, as well as other factors associated with experiencing obstetric violence. We argue that obstetric violence is prevalent in government-sector (public) maternity care facilities in the Colombo district and is associated with young age, lower family income, non-majority ethnicity, and rural residency. Significantly, this study sheds light on a serious concern that has been underexamined, wherein women who report experiencing obstetric violence are also less likely to be asked by a health care provider about domestic violence experiences. Further research at the clinical level needs to focus on appropriate training and interventions to ensure women’s safety and cultivate relationships between patients and health care providers characterized by trust, confidence, and respect.

Labouring Together: Women's experiences of “Getting the care that I want and need” in maternity care

ObjectivePoor interprofessional collaboration and lack of decision-making with women have been identified as being detrimental to the quality, safety, and experience of maternity care. The aim of the Labouring Together study was to explore childbearing women's preferences for and experiences of collaboration and control over decision-making in maternity care. DesignA sequential, mixed-method, multi-site case study approach was used to explore the perceptions and experiences of childbearing women regarding collaboration and decision-making. Women's preferred role for decision-making compared to the actual experiences, and the influences upon their preferences and experiences of collaboration were explored using semi-structured interviews. An inductive approach was used for qualitative analysis of interviews, and cross-case analyses were conducted using replication logic. SettingPostnatal wards of 1 private and 3 public maternity services in both metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia. ParticipantsPostnatal women, over the age of 18 years (n=182). FindingsHalf (48.3%) of the participants indicated a preference for a shared decision-making role and 35% preferred an active role. Only 16.7% participants indicated a preference for a passive role, however 24.4% of women reported experiencing a passive decision-making role during their maternity care. Statistically significant differences were also identified between preferences for and experiences of decision-making among women who chose the private obstetrician model of maternity care compared to the public maternity care system. Negative impacts upon women's autonomy over decision-making included: poor access to midwifery models of care; poor access to relational continuity of care; poor understanding of the rights of the woman; inadequate information for women about the risks and benefits of all proposed interventions; and a bureaucratic style of decision-making based upon a dominant discourse of risk avoidance that could ultimately veto the woman's choice. Key conclusionsDespite evidence of the benefits for women of having autonomy over decision-making in their own care, fundamental barriers were identified that hindered women's participation in collaboration in maternity care. Shared decision-making with childbearing women is not routine practice in maternity care in Victoria, Australia. Implications for practiceRelational continuity of care is imperative to promote the autonomy of childbearing women and an environment conducive to women's active engagement in maternity care and participation in shared decision-making.

Public health insurance and maternal health care utilization in India: evidence from the 2005–2012 mothers’ cohort data

BackgroundThe introduction of Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in India, a conditional cash transfer program which incentivized women to deliver at institutions, resulted in a significant increase in institutional births. Another major health policy reform, which could have affected maternal and child health care (MCH) utilization, was the public health insurance scheme (RSBY) launched in 2008. However, there is a noticeable lack of studies that examine how RSBY had impacted on MCH utilization in India. We used data from a cohort of mothers whose delivery had been captured in both the 2005 and 2011/12 rounds of the Indian Human Development Survey (IHDS) to study the impact of health insurance (in particular, the public insurance scheme versus private insurance) on MCH access. We also investigated whether maternal empowerment was a significant correlate that affects MCH utilization.MethodsWe used the multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression model to account for the clustered nature of our data. We derived indexes for women’s empowerment using Principal component analysis (PCA) technique applied to various indicators of women’s autonomy and socio-economic status.ResultsOur results indicated that the odds of mothers’ MCH utilization levels vary by district, community and mother over time. The effect of the public insurance scheme (RSBY) on MCH utilization was not as strong as privately available insurance. However, health insurance was only significant in models that did not control for household and mother level predictors. Our findings indicated that maternal empowerment indicators – in particular, maternal ability to go out of the house and complete chores and economic empowerment—were associated with higher utilization of MCH services. Among control variables, maternal age and education were significant correlates that increase MCH service utilization over time. Household wealth quintile was another significant factor with mothers belonging to upper quintiles more likely to access and utilize MCH services.ConclusionsChange in women’s and societal attitude towards maternal care may have played a significant role in increasing MCH utilization over the study period. There might be a need to increase the coverage of the public insurance scheme given the finding that it was less effective in increasing MCH utilization. Importantly, policies that aim to improve health services for women need to take maternal autonomy and empowerment into consideration.

Prevalence and aetiologies of anaemia among first trimester pregnant women in Sri Lanka; the need for revisiting the current control strategies

BackgroundThe Sustainable development goals, which focus strongly on equity, aim to end all forms of malnutrition by 2030. However, a significant cause of intergenerational transfer of malnutrition, anaemia in pregnancy, is still a challenge. It is especially so in the low- and middle-income settings where possible context-specific aetiologies leading to anaemia have been poorly explored. This study explores the prevalence of etiological factors significantly contributing to anaemia in pregnancy in Sri Lanka, a lower-middle-income country with a high prevalence of malnutrition albeit robust public health infrastructure.MethodsAll first-trimester pregnant women registered in the public maternal care programme in the Anuradhapura district from July to September 2019 were invited to participate in Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort (RaPCo). After a full blood count analysis, high-performance liquid chromatography, peripheral blood film examination, serum B12 and folate levels were performed in anaemic participants, guided by an algorithm based on the red cell indices in the full blood count. In addition, serum ferritin was tested in a random subsample of 213 participants. Anaemic women in this subsample underwent B12 and folate testing.ResultsAmong 3127 participants, 14.4% (95%CI 13.2–15.7, n = 451) were anaemic. Haemoglobin ranged between 7.4 to 19.6 g/dl. 331(10.6%) had mild anaemia. Haemoglobin ≥13 g/dl was observed in 39(12.7%). Microcytic, normochromic-normocytic, hypochromic-normocytic and macrocytic anaemia was observed in 243(54%), 114(25.3%), 80(17.8%) and two (0.4%) of full blood counts in anaemic women, respectively. Microcytic anaemia with a red cell count ≥5 * 106 /μl demonstrated a 100% positive predictive value for minor haemoglobinopathies. Minor hemoglobinopathies were present in at least 23.3%(n = 105) of anaemic pregnant women. Prevalence of iron deficiency, B12 deficiency and Southeast Asian ovalocytosis among the anaemic was 41.9% (95%CI 26.4–59.2), 23.8% (95%CI 10.6–45.1) and 0.9% (95%CI 0.3–2.3%), respectively. Folate deficiency was not observed.ConclusionEven though iron deficiency remains the primary cause, minor hemoglobinopathies, B 12 deficiency and other aetiologies substantially contribute to anaemia in pregnancy in this study population. Public health interventions, including screening for minor hemoglobinopathies and multiple micronutrient supplementation in pregnancy, should be considered in the national programme for areas where these problems have been identified.

“Agents of Change” in Maternal and Infant Care:Matronas,Parteras, and Public Health in Bolivia, 1950s–1970s

AbstractIn the 1950s and 1960s young women could study to become obstetric midwives (matronas) at two Bolivian universities. After the 1952 Bolivian Revolution, public health officials saw matronas' work in mining areas and rural public health programs as part of the government's effort to assimilate Indigenous Bolivians into a mestizo national culture, by reforming Indigenous mothers and eliminating demand for Andean midwives (parteras). By the 1970s, a military dictatorship had replaced the revolutionary government, and nursing schools had replaced midwifery programs. The last cohort of matronas now found jobs in public health offering trainings to parteras. Based on oral histories of matronas and parteras, this article examines these women's personal experiences with midwifery and public health. It argues that matronas and parteras shaped public maternal and infant care programs and contributed to the persistence of multiple forms of childbirth assistance in Bolivia.

Factors influencing women\u2019s perceptions of choice and control during pregnancy and birth: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundWomen across the world value choice and control throughout their maternity care experiences. In response to this health policy and frameworks are adapting and developing. The concepts of choice and control are extrinsically complex and open to interpretation by healthcare professionals and service users, with the two not necessarily aligning. Depending on a number of factors, women’s experiences of choice and control within the same maternity care system may be very different. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing women’s perceptions of choice and control during pregnancy and birth in Ireland.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using an adapted version of the UK national maternity experience survey (National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit). During March – July 2017, a sample of 1277 women were recruited from the postnatal wards of three maternity units and a tertiary maternity hospital. Poisson regression was used to assess the association between twelve factors and a series of measures of the women’s perception of choice and control.ResultsMost women reported not having choice in the model or location of their maternity care but most reported being involved enough in decision-making, especially during birth. Women who availed of private maternity care reported higher levels of choice and control than those who availed of public maternity care. This factor was the most influential factor on almost all choice and control measures.ConclusionMost women experiencing maternity care in Ireland report not having choice in the model and location of care. These are core elements of the Irish maternity strategy and significant investment will be required if improved choice is to be provided. Availing of private maternity care has the strongest influence on a woman’s perceived choice and control but many women cannot afford this type of care, nor may they want this model of care.

Associations Between Maternal Immunisation and Reduced Rates of Preterm Birth and Stillbirth: A Population Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Stillbirth and preterm birth (PTB) remain two of the most important, unresolved challenges in modern pregnancy care. Approximately 10% of all births are preterm with nearly one million children dying each year due to PTB. It remains the most common cause of death among children under five years of age. The numbers for stillbirth are no less shocking with 2.6 million babies stillborn each year. With minimal impact on the rate of these adverse birth outcomes over the past decade there is an urgent need to identify more effective interventions to tackle these problems. In this retrospective cohort study, we used whole-of-population data, to determine if maternal immunization during pregnancy against influenza and/or pertussis, is associated with a lower risk of PTB, delivering a small-for-gestational age (SGA) infant, developing preeclampsia or stillbirth. Women with a singleton pregnancy at 28 or more weeks’ gestation delivering in Victoria, Australia from July 2015 to December 2018 were included in the analysis. Log-binomial regression was used to measure the relationship between vaccination during pregnancy against influenza and against pertussis, with preterm birth, SGA, preeclampsia and stillbirth. Variables included in the adjusted model were maternal age, body mass index, first or subsequent birth, maternal Indigenous status, socio-economic quintile, smoking, public or private maternity care and metropolitan or rural location of the hospital. Women who received influenza vaccine were 75% less likely to have a stillbirth (aRR 025; 95% CI 0.20, 0.31), and 31% less likely to birth <37 weeks (aRR 0.69; 95% CI 0.66, 0.72). Women who received pertussis vaccine were 77% less likely to have a stillbirth (aOR 0.23; 95% CI 0.18, 0.28) and 32% less likely to birth <37 weeks gestation (aRR 0.68; 95% CI 0.66, 0.71). Vaccination also reduced the odds of small for gestational age by 13% and reduced the odds of pre-eclampsia when restricted to primiparous women. This association was seen over four different influenza seasons and independent of the time of year suggesting that any protective effect on obstetric outcomes afforded by maternal vaccination may not be due to a pathogen-specific response but rather due to pathogen-agnostic immune-modulatory effects.

A qualitative study on professionals\u2019 attitudes and views towards the introduction of patient reported measures into public maternity care pathway

BackgroundThe importance and potential benefits of introducing patient reported measures (PRMs) into health care service have been widely acknowledged, yet the experience regarding their implementation into practice is limited. There is a considerable paucity of research in adopting PRMs in maternity care routine. This study, which utilizes the PRMs included in Pregnancy and Childbirth (PCB) outcome set developed by International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) as sample measures, aims to elicit Finnish professionals’ views on PRMs and to explore the applicability of PRMs in Finnish public maternity care.MethodsThis qualitative study, applying semi-structured interviews, described the local professionals’ views towards the application of PRMs in Finnish public maternity care. Professionals were asked to assess the PRMs defined in ICHOM PCB set and provide their expectations and concerns on the implementation of PRMs in Finnish public maternity service.ResultsTwenty professionals participated in the interviews. Participants agreed on the importance and relevance of the PRMs questions included in ICHOM PCB set for delivering and developing maternity care in Finland. However, they criticized the number and length of questions as well as the recommended time points of data collection. In addition, for a successful implementation, various steps like developing suitable questions, redesigning service pathway and protocols, and motivating women to respond to PRMs questions were considered to be important. Also, some potential obstacles, difficulties and risks associated with the implementation were underlined.ConclusionThis study indicates that the implementation of PRMs into Finnish public maternity service is possible, highly relevant and important. However, the adoption of PRMs into routine practice may be challenging and will require a series of efforts. This study shows viewpoints from Finnish professionals who have not participated in developing the ICHOM PCB standard set and provides important insights on the development and implementation of PRMs.

Utilizing Structured Worksheets to Strengthen Resident Teaching on the OB/GYN Clerkship.

To determine if structured worksheets can aid resident teaching on the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clerkship. We developed structured worksheets to aid residents in teaching medical students. In this pilot study, we measured the impact of the material by conducting end of clerkship focus groups between October 2017 to June 2018 and administering surveys to medical students who had recently completed the clerkship. We performed analyses of the focus group transcriptions for positive and negative themes and analyzed questionnaire data utilizing unpaired t-test and chi-square test to determine whether resident use of structured worksheets influenced student perception of resident teaching quality. Medical students rotated at either an academically affiliated public safety-net hospital or tertiary maternity care hospital. Medical students completing the OB/GYN clerkship volunteered to participate. A total of 37 students participated in focus groups and completed the survey. Focus group comments revealed a generally positive attitude towards the structured worksheets. The survey data revealed that this material helped to facilitate student's clinical reasoning skills and assisted residents in using questions to effectively teach. Structured worksheets can aid resident teaching on the OB/GYN clerkship. Students perceived the teaching material most favorably when residents utilized the material in a purposeful and timely manner. Effective resident use of structured worksheets on the OB/GYN clerkship can strengthen a culture that promotes student learning. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01318-7.

Competition between Public and Private Maternity Care Providers in France: Evidence on Market Segmentation.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential for segmentation in hospital markets, using the French case where private for-profit providers play an important role having nearly 25% of market shares, and where prices are regulated, leading to quality competition. Using a stylized economic model of hospital competition, we investigate the potential for displacement between vertically differentiated public and private providers, focusing on maternity units where user choice is central. Building over the model, we test the following three hypotheses. First, the number of public maternity units is likely to be much larger in less populated departments than in more populated ones. Second, as the number of public maternity units decreases, the profitability constraint should allow more private players into the market. Third, private units are closer substitutes to other private units than to public units. Building an exhaustive and nationwide data set on the activity of maternity services linked to detailed data at a hospital level, we use an event study framework, which exploits two sources of variation: (1) The variation over time in the number of maternity units and (2) the variation in users’ choices. We find support for our hypotheses, indicating that segmentation is at work in these markets with asymmetrical effects between public and private sectors that need to be accounted for when deciding on public market entry or exit.

“No papers. No doctor”: undocumented immigrant women’s access to maternity care services in Denmark

Abstract Background In Denmark, undocumented immigrants have restricted access to health care including maternity care. Nordic studies describe that undocumented immigrant women face many barriers to access maternity care during pregnancy however, literature in a Danish setting is lacking. This study aims at exploring undocumented immigrant women's experience of and their access to maternity care services in Denmark. Methods The study setting was a non-governmental Health Clinic in Denmark, that provides primary health care, including maternity care, to undocumented immigrants. We recruited 21 undocumented immigrant women, conducted semi-structured interviews from 01.2018 to 01.2019. The data was analyzed through systematic text condensation. Results Undocumented immigrant women experience several barriers to access maternity care services in Denmark. We identified four themes with subthemes. i) Access to public maternity care services; the experiences with public maternity care providers, fear of deportation and concerns about having to pay for care. ii) Use of private and non-governmental maternity care services; the feeling of being safe at the Health Clinic, reaching care is challenged by logistics and choosing to pay for private health care services. iii) Perception of entitlements to care; wishing for a fair treatment, and uncertainty of what to expect when reaching a public health care facility. iv) Being dependent; dependency on the Health Clinic, social support from network and seeking information from other sources. Conclusions Our findings contribute with insights to understand the health behavior of undocumented immigrant women. Accessing public maternity care services is, apart from legal restrictions, dominated by fear of being reported to the immigration authorities, concerns about payment, and the management of rules from the health provider's perspective. Many of them depend on the Health Clinic as well as their personal networks for care and protection. Key messages Undocumented immigrant women face many barriers to access maternity care services. Inclusive policies for access to maternity care are needed to safeguard the health of the women and children.

Women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing: an explorative study within Finnish public maternity care.

Objectives To explore women's decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing (PreST) in Finland and to evaluate a counseling service. Methods Self-completion surveys were conducted at two medical settings (screening and further testing) of PreST. Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) was the main measure. Different types of statistical tests were used to compare women's decisional conflict at different medical settings of PreST, and before-after pre-test counseling. Multivariable linear regressions analyzed the influences of the medical settings and other factors on women's decisional conflict. Results Compared to women in population-based screening, women in further testing (before pre-test counseling) were more likely to feel well informed (P < 0.001), had increased values clarity (P < 0.001), but more likely experienced uncertainty (P = 0.040). Besides medical settings, maternal age, gravidity and previous experience of fetal aneuploidy significantly influenced decisional conflict. After counseling, screen-positive women felt better informed (P < 0.001), had increased values clarity (P < 0.001), perceived more support (P < 0.001), and had better decision certainty (P < 0.001) than before counseling. Conclusions Medical settings influence women's decisional conflict during PreST. Individual counseling is effective in improving screen-positive women's decisional conflict. This research adds knowledge and experience on developing decision-making supports across the pathway of PreST.

Being 'A Google Mom' or securely monitored at home: Perceptions of remote monitoring in maternity care.

To understand the perspectives of both healthcare professionals in maternity care and pregnant women with higher risk pregnancies about remote monitoring in maternity care. Qualitative descriptive design. Individual and focus group interviews were conducted in public maternity care and in a level III hospital in Finland during April-May 2018. The sample consisted of healthcare professionals working in the primary care and at the hospital and hospitalized pregnant women. Altogether, 17 healthcare professionals and 4 pregnant women participated in the study. The data were analysed using inductive thematic network analysis. Many possibilities - and an equal number of concerns - were identified regarding remote monitoring in pregnancy, depending on the respondent's viewpoint from holistic to symptom-centred care. Healthcare staff had reservations about technology due to previous negative experiences and difficulties trusting technology. The pregnant women thought that monitoring would ease the staff's workload if the latter had enough technological skills. Remote monitoring could increase security in pregnancy care but create a feeling of false security if the women ignored their subjective symptoms. Face-to-face visits and the uniqueness of human contact were strongly favoured. Pregnant women wished to use monitoring as a confirmation of their subjective feelings. Remote monitoring could be used as a supplementary system in pregnancy care, although it could replace only some healthcare visits. Pregnant women identified more possibilities for remote monitoring compared with the staff members both in primary care and the hospital. A comprehensive understanding of pregnant women's and healthcare professionals' perceptions of remote monitoring in pregnancy was built to be able to develop new technologies in maternity care. In certain cases, remote monitoring would supplement traditional pregnancy follow-ups. Staff in primary and specialized care, and healthcare managers, should support teamwork to be able to understand different approaches to pregnancy care.