Public Health Policy Makers Research Articles

Abstract 4112716: The Trend In Racial Differences In Mortality Attributed To Congenital Heart Diseases In Infants In The United States From 2005 To 2019

Background: Deaths from congenital heart disease (CHD) in children have been decreasing in the United States. We examined the differences in mortality trends between Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Non-Hispanic White (NHW) infants. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed publicly available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER). The data was obtained from the linked birth/infant deaths from 2005 to 2019. We evaluated all infant deaths up to 1 year of age with the cause of death listed as CHD (International classification of diseases, 10 th revision (ICD-10) codes Q20-Q26 (except atrial septal defect, Q21.1 and patent ductus arteriosus, Q25. CHD infant mortality rate (IMR) was calculated per 100,000 live births. Race was ascertained based on death certificate reporting. Joinpoint regression was used to examine CHD-IMR by year, including stratification by NHB vs NHW, and neonatal vs postneonatal. The difference between NHB and NHW CHD-IMR was ascertained via the Mann-Whitney U test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 60,243,988 live births, there were 19,004 CHD-related infant deaths. The characteristics of the study population are displayed in Table 1. The overall CHD-IMR declined from 36.1 to 27.0 per 100,000 live births (25.2%) with an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of -2.1 [95% CI -2.6, -1.572] (Figure 1). The CHD-IMR was significantly higher in NHB than in NHW (40 vs 29.3; P<0.0001) and this difference remained when the mortality rate was stratified by neonatal and post-neonatal periods. The CHD-IMR decreased significantly in NHW [AAPC: -2%; 95% CI: -2.5, -1.5%], but not in NHB [AAPC of -1.4%, 95% CI, -3.0, 0.3%]. The NHB-to-NHW CHD-IMR ratio, a measure of CHD-IMR disparity averaged 1.4 over the study period [AAPC: 0.8%; 95% CI: -0.2, 1.8%] (Figure 2). Conclusions: The CHD-IMR declined significantly for NHW, but not in NHB in the US from 2005 to 2019. The CHD-IMR was higher in NHB than in NHW. There was no significant change in the NHB-to-NHW CHD-IMR ratio, signifying no change in the disparity that exists between NHB and NHW IMR. These findings may have implications for patient care and public health policymaking. They lay the groundwork for additional studies to determine and understand the drivers behind these findings such as in prenatal diagnosis.

“Discover your potential to raise your children”: A psychoeducational infancy parenting intervention in Spain

AbstractBackgroundThe quality of parenting has a significant impact on healthy development across the life cycle. Recent research has highlighted the financial return of evidence‐based parenting programs that are well designed and implemented.ObjectiveTo analyze the impact of a psychoeducational guidance intervention program aimed at improving parenting skills.MethodThirty‐five families with children aged between 0 and 3.5 years referred from the educational, social, and health departments of the Vitoria‐Gasteiz City Council (Spain) participated in the study. Using a longitudinal approach, the intervention took place over the course of three home visits: initial pretest assessment visit, feedback and orientation visit, and a final posttest assessment visit.ResultsStatistically significant pretest–posttest differences were observed in parenting skills, including cognitive and socio‐emotional development scaffolding, parental self‐efficacy, parental adaptive stress, and diversity of experiences.ConclusionsSeveral areas for improvement were detected in the context of an intervention based on customized guidance for individual families. The implementation process indicated issues to be improved in future program editions.ImplicationsOur findings provide family and public health policy makers with empirical support for the implementation of parenting programs designed to help families to acquire and improve parenting competencies to foster their children's comprehensive development, focused on the period between 0 and 3.5 years of life. Results of the study favor the propagation among Spanish professionals who work with families of the use of quality standards of the evidence‐based approach related to quality of implementation and assessment of the impact of parenting programs.

Health Technology Assessment of Nailfold Capillaroscopy and Digital Retina Imaging in Diabetes Screening

AimThis study aims to identify the criteria for the evaluation of medical technologies in diabetes screening and then perform health technology assessment (HTA) for two technologies: digital retina imaging (DRI) and Nailfold Capillaroscopy (NFC). MethodsA multicriteria decision-making tool measuring attractiveness using a categorical-based evaluation technique (MACBETH) was used to calculate and compare alternatives. A focus group of ten decision-makers with more than ten years of experience in health technology was used for the decision-making. The Delphi Method was used to get a consensus about comparing criteria and alternatives to these criteria. The sampling method used in the study was the nonprobability purposive sampling method. ResultsThe study concluded that clinical efficacy (0.42) is the most important criterion for evaluating medical technologies, followed by cost-effectiveness (0.27). At the same time, ethical considerations were found to be less important (0.03). The sensitivity analysis concluded that the decision is sensitive to clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness changes. The study found that none of the alternatives dominates others as an option for early detection of diabetes through vascular changes. LimitationsThis study primarily uses systemic literature review methods to identify criteria for evaluating alternatives. There may be additional criteria for evaluation. ConclusionThis study provides an approach for a multicriteria comparison of medical devices. The study findings are useful for public health professionals and health policymakers. Plain Language SummaryThis study assesses nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) as a substitute for digital retina imaging (DRI) in diabetes screening using the MACBETH multicriteria decision-making tool. The research identifies five key evaluation criteria: clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, patient needs, user safety, and ethical considerations. A focus group of experienced health technology decision-makers was used to compare NFC and DRI. Results indicate that clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness are the most critical factors, with NFC showing potential but not significantly outperforming DRI. Sensitivity analyses highlight the need for further research to validate NFC as an effective diabetes screening tool.

Strengthening Indonesia’s health system through community and technological engagements in public health interventions

The 7th International Symposium on Public Health (ISoPH 2023), was held on October 2-3, 2023, in Surabaya, Indonesia, which brought together a diverse array of public health professionals, researchers, and policymakers from around the globe. The purpose of the symposium was to facilitate the exchange of the latest information and ideas within the realm of public health. The symposium aspired to foster discussions and the exchange of insights regarding scientific issues in the field of public health globally and within the context of Indonesia. Organized by the Faculty of Public Health at Airlangga University in Indonesia, the symposium addressed the urgent need for robust, resilient health systems capable of navigating the complex challenges of the modern era, particularly in the context of the Society 5.0 paradigm.

Exploring the state-of-the-art on competencies for policymaking in public health

Abstract Against the complex backdrop characterizing both the nature of public health challenges and the corresponding skills required to face them, this presentation will introduce the state-of-the-art on scholarship concerned with the definition and/or development of competencies for effective policy making in public health. The presentation will focus especially on presenting findings of a scoping review of the state-of the-art involving: 1) research that develops competency frameworks explicitly designed for policymakers operating in public health; and 2) case studies that explore the application of specific competencies (whether explicitly or implicitly) in different public health contexts. By exploring both bodies of literature, the scoping review will take stock of how each study defines the concept of competencies, enumerates areas of knowledge and demonstrable skills pertaining thereto, and uses evidence to establish their significance in the field of public health leadership. The findings of the scoping review will also be brought into comparative perspective, examining whether and how the categories of existing competency frameworks correspond with one another, as well as reflect the insights of single case studies. The proposed presentation will conclude with an overview of findings of a mapping exercise including all competencies identified in the literature, which can serve the workshop audience as both a synthesis and holistic refinement on the state-of-the-art going forward. The proposed presentation will conclude with an overview of findings of a mapping exercise including all competencies identified in the literature, which can serve the workshop audience as both a synthesis and holistic refinement on the state-of-the-art going forward. Speakers/Panelists Anne-Catherine Viso Santé publique France, Saint Maurice, France Charlotte Marchandise EUPHA Kasia Czabanowska Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

10.B. Scientific session: The European Health Data Space (EHDS): A sea of change for health data in Europe

Abstract A wealth of data is generated every day throughout our health systems which, if leveraged well, can underpin the digital solutions and policies that will transform health and care. However, the complexity and divergence of rules, structures and processes within and across European Member States make it difficult to fully harness that potential at European scale. The European Health Data Space will address this challenge by empowering Europeans to access and control their health data and by offering a harmonised and simplified framework for the reuse of health data, including for research, innovation, and policymaking purposes. During the workshop, we will present an overview of the European Health Data Space framework and its implementation phases and discuss its benefits for targeted stakeholders, including citizens, researchers and policymakers in public health. Objectives 1. Emphasise the importance of leveraging health data for research, innovation and policymaking; 2. Present the European Health Data Space regulation and what actions are being undertaken to prepare for its implementation; 3. Discuss how access to their health data can enable patients and individuals play an active role in their own health journey; 4. Discuss what will be the main benefits for policymakers and researchers in public health resulting from enhanced access to health data. Introduction by Chair for presenting the European Health Data Space and the setting the scene for the session. Short presentations by speakers: 1. Implementing the EHDS: lessons from the EHDS2 pilot - Marianne Benderra, Health Data Hub, presenting his experience on developing and piloting the EHDS infrastructure for secondary use of health data, highlighting key project developments; 2. How can the EHDS enable participatory healthcare? - Henrique Martins, ISCTE, xShare project on how the xShare “Yellow Button” will empower individuals with access to and control over their health data and may foster the development of knowledge and tools necessary for prevention and management of their health; 3. What will the EHDS enable for research and policymaking? - Nienke Schutte, Scienciano, bringing the perspective of a leading European public health institute how the benefits the EHDS framework can bring for policymaking, research and innovation. 15 min Q&A session, taking questions from the audience, possibly also through Slido. Possible guiding questions: How can stakeholders contribute more broadly to the development of the EHDS? What support is needed to ensure that data users and data holders are prepared when the EHDS framework becomes operational? Conclusions 2 min by Chair. Speakers/Panelists Marianne Benderra French Health Data Hub, Paris, France Henrique Manuel Martins ISCTE, Lisbon, Portugal Nienke Schutte Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium

Leveraging Behavioural Insights to Create Healthier Online Environment for Children

Abstract Issue/Problem The proliferation of digital marketing poses a significant threat to children’s health and well-being, necessitating innovative solutions grounded in cross-disciplinary systems approach. Description of the problem Children’s exposure to harmful digital marketing is pervasive, influencing their preferences, behaviours, and health outcomes. Traditional regulatory approaches often fall short in addressing the dynamic nature of online advertising, exacerbating the challenge. Without effective interventions, children remain vulnerable to the detrimental effects of marketing for unhealthy products and services, undermining public health efforts. Results Integrating behavioural sciences with public health suggests promising avenues for addressing the complexities of harmful digital marketing to children. The WHO KidAd app is a ground-breaking tool designed for objective monitoring of digital marketing. Coupled with evidence-based behavioural strategies such as nudges, choice architecture, and social norms, policymakers can influence decision-making in favour of healthier choices, thereby reducing the impact of harmful marketing. By understanding the decision-making processes and behavioural patterns involved, policymakers can design targeted interventions to mitigate exposure and protect children. Lessons Learned The application of behavioural sciences in public health policy-making yields valuable lessons. Firstly, personalized and contextually relevant interventions resonate more effectively with target audiences, enhancing their efficacy. Secondly, leveraging behavioural insights allows for the design of interventions that complement existing regulatory frameworks, filling gaps in enforcement and compliance. Thirdly, interdisciplinary collaboration between public health experts, policymakers, and behavioural scientists is essential for developing evidence-based strategies tailored to the digital landscape’s evolving challenges. [Grant: APVV-22-0587] Speakers/Panelists Amandine Garde Law & Non-Communicable Diseases Unit, Liverpool, UK

Thermal indices for evaluating the impact of thermal conditions on human health: a systematic review

Abstract Background Thermal indices assess individuals’ perception of their ambient thermal surroundings (thermal comfort and heat/cold stress) considering several meteorological factors, such as temperature, humidity, wind, and radiation. As climate change progresses, there is an increased demand for accurately monitoring the association between thermal environment and human health. This study summarizes the available evidence on the association between thermal indices and health outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until December 31st, 2023, to identify all relevant studies examining the association between thermal indices and health outcomes in outdoor environments. Results A total of 5,034 electronic records were screened. Of these, 310 were considered eligible, examining 1,143 associations. Seventeen indices were identified, with 32 (10.3%) articles using more than one index. The most commonly employed index was Apparent Temperature (articles: n = 141, 38.2%; associations: n = 634, 55.5%). The specific-cause health outcomes examined spanned 18 categories of the International Classification of Diseases. Most associations (n = 304, 26.6%) pertained to mortality/morbidity related to diseases of the circulatory system, followed by all-cause morbidity/mortality (n = 288, 25.2%). The 48.6% (n = 556) of the associations suggested an increased risk of adverse health outcomes when indices increased while 32.5% (n = 372) of the associations were non-significant. The 14.2% (n = 162) of the associations suggested an increased risk of adverse outcomes when indices decreased while 16% (n = 183) of the associations were non-significant. Conclusions The relevant literature revealed associations between thermal indices and health outcomes. Therefore, thermal indices, considering several meteorological variables, could be a useful tool for public health planning. However, there is diversity in their methodologies and reporting. Key messages • Summarizing the published evidence regarding thermal indices is expected to attract the interest of public health professionals and policy makers, and enhance their use. • Implementing integrated methods to monitor the association between thermal conditions and health, including using thermal indices, could be valuable for developing and evaluating policies.

The process of developing a framework for code of ethics

Abstract Issue/Problem The World Health Organisation (WHO) and Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER) roadmap for the professionalisation of the public health workforce has noted ethics as a pillar for professionalisation. It also highlights the need for code of ethics and professional conduct for all public health professionals and institutions. The Global Network for Academic Public Health (GNAPH), in collaboration with EUPHA, ASPHER, and the UK Faculty of Public Health has been working together for a code of ethics. Description of the problem The WHO/ASPHER group asked for a framework to be developed by the expert group as part of the rollout of the professionalisation agenda. The objective of this work was to develop a guide that is applicable to different countries within Europe to develop their own of code of ethics and conduct. A modified Delphi approach to building consensus amongst professionals in ethics included law, academia, and public health professionals. The questions sought to be answered were what and how to develop a framework and what should be included in the guide for creating a public health code of ethics. Results Throughout this method we developed five values, and twelve principles that are essential for the development of a code of ethics through a consensus building exercise. This framework was the first of its kind as part of the professionalisation agenda for different regions. There will be ongoing work piloting this framework in practice with various professional groups and institutions. Lessons Throughout this process, the need and demand across the public health community for ethical education and development of code of ethics was made evident. Collaboration between academics, ethicist, lawyers, and public health professionals and policy makers were key in developing a public health code of ethics. Identifying the challenges with monitoring and evaluating of its implementation a public health code of ethics. Key messages • Ethics, and a code of ethics are an essential component of the professionalisation agenda of the public health workforce. • There is need for continued collaboration and partnership with public health professionals and institutions in enacting its implementation and evaluation.

The INPHET- a global approach to Environmental Public Health Tracking

Abstract Environment and health monitoring and information systems are fundamental infrastructure for evidence provision for policy making. The International Network for Public Health and Environment Tracking (INPHET) was formed by a community of environmental public health practitioners to address common interests and activities that advance environmental public health surveillance (EPHS) and data systems, and their uses to inform public health actions. Its main goal is to address the vast inequalities across countries and communities in their ability to monitor, assess, inform and mitigate environmental and health issues. INPHET supports the relevant role of environmental epidemiology as the pillar science providing evidence for decision making and interventions aiming at reducing and preventing environmental related diseases and contributes to an overall vision for public health. As a “Community of Practice”, INPHET focuses on sharing experiences and expertise; addressing common challenges for implementing and enhancing the science of EPHS/tracking; improving understanding of the link between the environment and health; and providing the appropriate evidence that informs public policy. The network, initiated in conference meetings in 2012-13 and formally launched in Modena, Italy in 2014, has carried out several activities which aim at sharing expertise and learning from different models of environmental and health data integration and surveillance systems that directly inform policy. These include Twinning cooperation with Euro-Asian and Balkan countries and sharing of expertise with African Public Health Agencies. Some experiences are presented in this workshop and highlight the EPHS/EPHT model adopted by several national public health agencies. It promotes that such integration and uses of environmental and health data is key for EPHS, including their accessibility and usability for communities of public health researchers, practitioners and policy makers.

Sleep difficulties as a universal risk factor for injury among adolescents in 46 countries

Abstract Background Poor sleep is common among adolescents and associated with unintentional injuries. The current evidence base is limited by differences in measures of sleep and injury implemented across studies. We examined the potential universality of the relationship between poor sleep and injury cross-nationally using self-reports from 229,589 adolescents in 46 countries that were collected using common procedures and measures. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using records from the 2017/18 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC): World Health Organization cross-national study. The prevalence of sleep indicators (difficulties in falling asleep, insufficient sleep, social jet lag) and medically treated injuries (overall, multiple) were described across countries and by gender. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses were conducted within and across countries to test the consistency of the association between poor adolescent sleep and injuries. Results Overall, indicators of poor sleep were reported by nearly half of adolescents, and varied by gender and across countries. Country-level analyses found consistently positive associations between indicators of poor sleep and injuries. Pooled (multi-country) analyses further demonstrated a universality of these relationships across sleep indicators and injury outcomes. The strength of relationships varied by gender, with more robust associations detected among girls compared to boys. Conclusions Poor sleep is a robust and mainly consistent risk factor for injury among adolescents across countries and regions. Public health officials and policymakers should therefore recognize adolescent sleep as a health priority. The promotion of sleep hygiene may represent a novel target for injury prevention at regional and national levels. Key messages • Poor sleep, in the form of sleep difficulties, insufficient sleep, and social jet lag, were robust and mainly consistent injury risk factors among adolescents across 46 countries. • Public health officials should recognize sleep hygiene as a novel focus for adolescent injury prevention.

Uncovering the health system burden of pneumococcal infections in adult and elderly populations

Abstract Background Health system resources dedicated to vaccination and infectious disease prevention are often directed towards infants and children, through extensive childhood vaccination schedules. This focus has led to the near eradication of several preventable childhood diseases and had positive impacts on population health, but despite this track record of success, the ability of our health systems to make vaccinations accessible throughout the full life course has been less consistent. This project aims to address this issue by providing new data about the burden that pneumococcal infections, which are vaccine-preventable, have on adult and elderly populations. Methods This research aims to uncover the health system burden of invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumococcal pneumonia at all levels of the health system in 5 EU countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Italy & Portugal). This involves a survey of managers and care providers working in hospitals, long-term care facilities, and primary care centres who may be affected by the health system impacts of pneumococcal infections. The survey covers several dimensions of health service delivery to collect a broad range of data on existing disruptions. The survey was translated into the study country languages and its formulation was further validated through interviews with experts in each study country to ensure that it can capture context-specific health system insights. The data collected through this survey will be further enhanced through a series of in-depth interviews before being synthesised, analysed and eventually published in a detailed report. Results Data collection begins as of 15 May 2024, and full results are expected to be published and available for the EPH Conference in November 2024. The results of this research will offer valuable evidence to public health professionals, health managers and policy-makers across Europe who are working to improve life-course access to pneumococcal vaccination. Key messages • Effective vaccination programmes for adult and elderly populations require expanding focus beyond childhood. • Data about the health system burden of pneumococcal infections in adult and elderly populations improves evidence-based decision-making and public health services.

Climate Change, Air Pollution, African Dust Impacts on Public Health and Sustainability in Europe

Abstract Climate change poses a significant threat to environmental sustainability and public health, leading to extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and biodiversity loss. Research on air pollution from African dust adversely associated with climate change highlights its significant role in trapping heat in the atmosphere and causing heat-related illnesses, cardiovascular disorders, and respiratory ailments. Smog, dust, acid rain, and ozone depletion also negatively impact ecosystems. The methods of the study also include the dynamics of climate change-induced air pollution. The implications for public health and environmental sustainability through GWR modeling and MODIS-NDVI analysis of controlling air pollution are crucial for reducing the climate crisis, safeguarding public health, and maintaining ecosystem sustainability. Results from particulate matter (PM 2.5-10), which consists of tiny particles with varying diameters, can enter the respiratory system through inhalation. This can lead to a diameter of less than 10 μm (PM 2.5-10). According to the relevant legislation, the limit value refers to the daily average value and must not exceed 50 μg/m3. While ozone in the stratosphere serves a protective function against ultraviolet radiation, excessive levels at ground level can be harmful and have been recorded in atmospheric samples ranging from 146.6 μg/m3 up to 702.3 μg/m3. impacting the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. Policy leaders, businesses, and individuals need to be proactive in reducing air pollution, adopting clean energy technology, and implementing stricter pollution rules. Stricter pollution rules, environmentally friendly transportation choices, and the adoption of clean energy technology. The sustainability of the ecosystem and public health are significantly impacted by climate change linked to air pollution. To solve these global problems and move toward a healthier, cleaner future for future generations, we must act now on climate justice. Key messages • Examine the impact of African dust air pollution on public health and its significant impacts from climate change, provide solutions to mitigate its effects on environmental sustainability in Europe. • Public health workers, Policymakers and stakeholders must prioritize reducing emissions and enforcing strict air quality laws to mitigate the negative impact of African dust on European populations.

Socioeconomic And Mental Health Challenges: Lessons From The COVID-19 Era

Abstract The relationship between work arrangements, financial difficulties, compliance with COVID-19 sanitary measures, and preexisting mental health issues amidst the ongoing pandemic is multifaceted. By merging data from the TEMPO cohort and other European cohort studies during the RESPOND European project, we seek to provide comprehensive about these dynamics for developing targeted interventions and policies aimed at mitigating the adverse impact of pandemics on mental well-being. Our analyses reveal significant associations between unemployment, financial strain, and elevated levels of symptoms of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even after controlling for pre-pandemic socioeconomic and mental health factors, individuals experiencing unemployment or financial difficulties were more likely to report heightened mental distress. Additionally, our findings highlight gender-specific patterns in compliance with COVID-19 sanitary measures, with women exhibiting increased compliance amidst mental health difficulties, while men, particularly those with lower educational attainment, demonstrated decreased compliance. These preliminary results underscore the complex interplay between socioeconomic factors, mental health, and public health behaviours during pandemics. In conclusion, our study underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions and strategies to address the intersecting challenges of mental health, employment, financial strain, and compliance with public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings emphasize the importance of considering socioeconomic disparities in designing effective interventions aimed at promoting public well-being and resilience in the face of future pandemics. By leveraging these insights, public health practitioners and policymakers can develop evidence-based approaches to support individuals and communities experiencing heightened vulnerabilities during times of crisis.

1.Y.2. Children’s mental health problems explode. Can exposome research offer a solution?

Abstract Background A week-long, multidisciplinary workshop at the Lorentz Institute explored the expectations of exposome research on child health. Exposome research investigates how combined exposures affect health. Currently we see an increase in adolescent mental health problems in Europe. We explore at the workshop if and how exposome research can be part of the solution to tackle this health issue. Findings The workshop aims were to analyze how monitoring data from exposome research can be best used for improving health policy in relation to improving (environmental) health policy in relation to children’s health. By taking a deep dive into solution-finding, we explored creative solutions to better utilize existing exposome data from digital data platforms, such as cohort data. And to facilitate working across disciplines using innovative tools of working transdisciplinary across research, policymakers and other professionals. Furthermore, we study how to enhance, harmonize and interpretation of data on child health. Furthermore, we look how child health depends not only on the quality of a healthcare system, but also on the magnitude of negative or positive influencing factors, such as social and environmental factors. Identifying such stressors and reducing their impact through adequate policies can improve child health on local, national, or even global scales. One innovative way of identifying such stressors is the exposome approach. The exposome approach is the characterization of the non-genetic drivers of health and disease. The exposome comprises aspects of the Built environment (characteristics of where we live); the Social environment (with whom we interact, social networks and income); the Physio-Chemical environment (chemical and environmental factors exposure) and the Lifestyle/Food environment (what we eat, how much we exercise) over the entire life-course. Workshop aims: - Provide a background on the urgency of adolescent mental health problems in Europe. - Compare approaches of stakeholders and researchers: stakeholders’ input from the practical field can shape the approach of the research process. The second benefit is to derive implications for creating effective interventions and policies to prevent adverse effects of environmental exposures and to foster positive health in children and later in life. - Explore existing interventions on child health for issues, experiences and possible solutions to the governance and organization of health adaptation in urban and social planning. - How to act in the process of research to intervention to public policies. The workshop consists of three short presentations followed by interactive panel discussions. We end with the audience actively engaging in the debate, as well as entering their questions. The workshop will end by identifying the current and future necessary roles, responsibilities, capacities of the public health researchers, policymakers, and professionals for child health protection in complicated exposure settings. Key messages • Child mental health issues are increasing in an unexplainable way. • Engaging stakeholders into an exposome research process can help to form a child health strategy in Europe.

10.Q. Scientific session: Evolving landscape of scientific publishing practices: implications for public health

Abstract In the landscape of scientific publishing, questionable research practices pose significant threats to the integrity and reliability of health research. This is occurring alongside notable changes in both the quantity and quality of published work. This scientific session aims to dissect the implications of such changes and practices on public health, fostering a critical examination and encouraging proactive discourse among public health professionals, researchers, and policymakers. Meta-research can explore the nuances of publishing ethics and the idea behind this session is seeking to heighten awareness of these issues and initiate meaningful discussions among public health professionals on maintaining the integrity of scientific literature in the health domain. The session will delve into the complexities of contemporary publishing, including the proliferation of mega-journals, trends in retracted papers, journals delisted from scientific databases, and the disturbing trend of paper mills which produce fraudulent research papers. Each aspect will be scrutinized for its potential impact on the credibility of health research and the consequential risks to public health. Structured as an interactive panel discussion, the format of this session is designed to maximize engagement and foster an open exchange of ideas. Participants will be encouraged to contribute their experiences and perspectives after each of the three presentations, enriching the dialogue and enhancing collective understanding. The distinct topics presented will underscore the pervasive nature of publishing practices and malpractices across different aspects of health research, highlighting the interconnectedness of ethical challenges and their broader implications. This session will merge meta-research empirical evidence with practical repercussions, offering attendees a comprehensive perspective on how publishing ethics might be shaping public health outcomes. It aims to equip participants with the knowledge to identify dubious practices and advocate for higher standards in scientific publishing. Improving research integrity is a cornerstone for effective health policies and interventions. The subject matter is poised to stimulate debate, invite scrutiny, and inspire action. Through this discourse, the session will articulate key messages about the urgency of upholding ethical standards in publishing to safeguard health research, providing clear, actionable insights for attendees to implement in their respective fields Key messages • Unethical publishing practices endanger health research integrity and might have consequences for public health outcomes. • Acknowledging good publishing practices and combating malpractices will foster higher ethical standards in health research.

Fast lane for decision making: The PHIRI Rapid Exchange Forum

Abstract Issue & Problem The COVID-19 pandemic demanded swift, yet structured exchange of knowledge, data and good practices between experts and institutions supporting national governments in decision making for crisis response. Thus, in March 2020 population health experts from several European countries started to meet online, complementing the more formal EU Health Security Committee meetings. The European Commission understood the high need of Member States for evidence-based, and structured cross-country exchange and supported it as part of the Population Health Research Infrastructure (www.PHIRI.eu) project. Since then, the PHIRI Rapid Exchange Forum (REF) is a knowledge-sharing platform that brings together public health researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share information, experiences, and best practices in public health implementation research even if the EU co-funded PHIRI project has ended. The forum aims to promote collaboration and networking, facilitate the dissemination of research findings, and accelerate the translation of evidence into policy and practice. Lessons Through the PHIRI REF, participants can engage in interactive discussions, workshops, and presentations on various public health topics, including infectious diseases, digitalisation, health emergency simulations, health systems strengthening, and community health interventions. The platform is designed to be user-friendly and accessible to all, with a particular focus on European countries. By May 2024, the REF-Secretariat at the Austrian National Public Health Institute GÖG had organised 60 REF meetings, with in average 20 attendees from 12-15 countries. The monthly 1-hour online meetings cover in a moderated, structured format pre-agreed topics that are proposed by the participating countries. All findings and topics are documented and publicly available at the EU Health Information Portal (https://www.healthinformationportal.eu/rapid-exchange-forum). Key messages • The success of the Rapid Exchange Forum highlights the importance of collaboration and information exchange between population health experts in addressing global health challenges. • Having a pre-established information exchange network on urgent public health issues is of utmost importance as it enables rapid and trustworthy communication among relevant stakeholders.

3.O. Scientific session: Migrant labour exploitation and health: How can research foster protection of migrant workers?

Abstract Migrant workers sustain essential industries such as the food supply chain, construction, and domestic and care work. They tend to perform onerous and risk-laden tasks at low pay without employment or health protections, and often under exploitative terms (e.g., debt bonding, piecework). Current evidence on associations between migration, employment terms and conditions, and health indicates profound inequities in work-related health outcomes for migrant workers. Although the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted these disparities and their potential social and public health implications, migrant workers continue to be overlooked by public health scholars and policymakers. Supranational regulations (such as EU directives) and national policies rarely consider migrants in their role as workers, and little research is dedicated to questions at the intersection of migration, employment, and health. The invisibility of migrant workers is also a matter of disciplinary and sectoral silos, with different aspects of migrant labour regulated separately by Ministries of Immigration, Labour, Agriculture, Health, and others. These silos create incompatible, context-contingent definitions, terminologies, and administrative categorizations, leading to inconsistent data collection and data gaps which, in turn, translate into policy blind spots. Data that are comparable across contexts and that refer to migration, employment/work and health are generally scarce. For some sectors and contexts, virtually no data exist; e.g., for migrant workers in agriculture, construction, and domestic work, and for migrant workers in low- and middle-income countries. There is barely any evidence about interventions to improve the structures that dictate migrant workers’ employment conditions or obligations of employers. Given the limited participatory research with migrant workers, we have a very poor understanding of their views and viable intervention options, and migrant workers’ voices thus also remain absent from policymaking. This workshop aims to contribute to greater visibility of - and ultimately action on - migrant labour exploitation in research and policy. To this end, it will map current challenges and shortcomings in generating evidence on the links between migration, work/employment, and health; and it will suggest ways to improve research and interventions to address migrant workers’ health, based on the speakers’ experience in developing intervention-focused evidence in different contexts. The workshop will conclude with an open discussion to identify further relevant questions and elaborate steps towards better research and greater protections for mobile worker populations. Key messages • Harm from exploitative working conditions among migrant workers is substantial, yet data collection methods and intervention designs are limited. • For public health research to effectively help protect the health and rights of migrant workers, it is essential to share methods and insights across disciplines to drive research for action.

The corporate political activity of Portugal’s food industry: enhancing public health transparency

Abstract Background This study in Portugal aims to monitor the Corporate Political Activity (CPA) in the food industry. Portugal provides a compelling case study due to its robust implementation of public health policies. Methods A systematic qualitative approach proposed by Mialon et al., a part of the INFORMAS Module 3, was employed. This method is based on the analysis of publicly available information. Key industry actors were selected through expert consultation and market analysis using EuroMonitor data. Information sources included industry, government, and academic materials accessed via websites and news. A thematic qualitative analysis was conducted involving iterative steps: identifying CPA practices based on predefined strategies - Taxonomy of Action Strategies: access and influence policymaking, use the law to obstruct policies, manufacture public support, shape evidence, displace and usurp public health, and manage reputations -, recording methods in a database, and saving evidence. Data collection spanned October 2023 to April 2024, covering materials from 2022 to 2023. Results Twenty-five key players were identified, including processed food and non-alcoholic beverage manufacturers, fast food companies, food retailers, and national trade associations. Food retailers, notably Jerónimo Martins, Lidl, Mercadona, and Sonae, showcased a higher prevalence of CPA. Nestlé and Sumol+Compal also emerged as prominent actors. The food industry in Portugal employs diverse strategies and tactics primarily focused on shaping evidence and managing reputations. While instances of displacing public health priorities and manufacturing public support were observed, they were relatively fewer. Only APED and FIPA showed engagement in policymaking influence. Conclusions Vigilant monitoring of CPA in the food industry in Portugal reveals dominant tactics of shaping evidence and managing reputations. Understanding these strategies is vital for policymaking to safeguard public health. Key messages • The food industry in Portugal employs diverse strategies, primarily shaping evidence and managing reputations, to influence public health policies. • Monitoring the Corporate Political Activity is key to preserving the integrity of public health policymaking in Portugal’s food industry.

9.L. Round table: “What” and “How” for building competencies for effective policy making in and for public health

Abstract Policymakers operating within the field of public health must regularly draw on their skills or competencies to facilitate engagement in and between policy sectors and with the public, to navigate the larger landscape of public health institutions and governance levels across the policy cycle, to generate, understand, and apply evidence for decision making, as well as to negotiate the demands of diverse stakeholders. What exactly are the competencies needed and how can they be cultivated to enhance the collective capacity of policymaking institutions? The increasing strain placed on public health systems worldwide, owing specially to challenges in population ageing, the burden of non-communicable diseases, and the exigencies introduced by pandemics, environmental disasters, and geo-political instabilities push us to expand the scope of public health. A look to the policy environs and outcomes seen within and across countries demonstrates that the quality of policy is both highly variable and exceedingly subject to the quality of public health leadership itself. These developments shed light on the need for greater investment in the development of competencies needed by policymakers to engage in effective decision making on key issues impacting population health and the resilience of public health systems. This includes efforts to strengthen the abilities of policymakers to identify problems, recognize opportunities, and put forth solutions in line with robust data and evidence, principles of public health ethics, gaps and priorities in public health needs, and in accordance with financial and political realities. The proposed roundtable will examine the state-of-the-art on policymaking competencies in public health, and how to build them by examining the barriers and opportunities. The panel will convene leading experts in the field of public health research and practice to explore: 1) the conceptual definition of competencies for policymaking at different levels of governance and across the policy cycle; 2) the strengths and limits of competency frameworks and their utility in guiding assessment and training tools, as well as policy practice; 3) the challenges associated with developing, maintaining and transferring competencies in fast-changing, multi-level policy making environments; 4) the challenges for public health experts and institutions to be trusted advisors both by policy makers and other stakeholders and the population; and 5) the opportunities to harness the unexploited power of professional networks in some countries of Europe. Key messages • An enhanced research agenda and investment are needed for the development of competencies - individual and collective - for effective public health policy-making and stronger governance. • Innovative approaches to policy-making are needed, and this requires building competencies, including leadership, for addressing the complex nature of public health.