Public Health Critical Race Praxis Research Articles

Invited Commentary: Race, Ethnicity, and Racism in Epidemiologic Research-Perspectives from Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP).

In 2023, Martinez et al. examined trends in the inclusion, conceptualization, operationalization and analysis of race and ethnicity among studies published in US epidemiology journals. Based on a random sample of papers (N=1,050) published from 1995-2018, the authors describe the treatment of race, ethnicity, and ethnorace in the analytic sample (N=414, 39% of baseline sample) over time. Between 32% and 19% of studies in each time stratum lacked race data; 61% to 34% lacked ethnicity data. The review supplies stark evidence of the routine omission and variability of measures of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research. Informed by public health critical race praxis (PHCRP), this commentary discusses the implications of four problems the findings suggest pervade epidemiology: 1) a general lack of clarity about what race and ethnicity are; 2) the limited use of critical race or other theory; 3) an ironic lack of rigor in measuring race and ethnicity; and, 4) the ordinariness of racism and white supremacy in epidemiology. The identified practices reflect neither current publication guidelines nor the state of the knowledge on race, ethnicity and racism; therefore, we conclude by offering recommendations to move epidemiology toward more rigorous research in an increasingly diverse society.

Invited Commentary: Mixing multiple imputation and bootstrapping for variance estimation.

In 2023, Martinez et al. examined trends in the inclusion, conceptualization, operationalization and analysis of race and ethnicity among studies published in US epidemiology journals. Based on a random sample of papers (N=1,050) published from 1995-2018, the authors describe the treatment of race, ethnicity, and ethnorace in the analytic sample (N=414, 39% of baseline sample) over time. Between 32% and 19% of studies in each time stratum lacked race data; 61% to 34% lacked ethnicity data. The review supplies stark evidence of the routine omission and variability of measures of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research. Informed by public health critical race praxis (PHCRP), this commentary discusses the implications of four problems the findings suggest pervade epidemiology: 1) a general lack of clarity about what race and ethnicity are; 2) the limited use of critical race or other theory; 3) an ironic lack of rigor in measuring race and ethnicity; and, 4) the ordinariness of racism and white supremacy in epidemiology. The identified practices reflect neither current publication guidelines nor the state of the knowledge on race, ethnicity and racism; therefore, we conclude by offering recommendations to move epidemiology toward more rigorous research in an increasingly diverse society.

Situating implementation science (IS) in res(IS)tance: a conceptual frame toward the integration of scholarship from the black radical tradition.

This manuscript undertakes a disciplinary self-critique of the field of implementation science, a field which attempts to bridge the gap between evidence-based interventions and their practical application. Despite the heightened emphasis on health equity and racial disparities, the field's current discourse is limited by key epistemic shortcomings. First, even though prevalence of implementation gaps between racialized groups in the United States necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the systems perpetuating these disparities, the field does not operate with a general explanation for disparities not as a failure of systems, but a system historically and structural designed to produce disparities. Second, the field has attempted to address disparities without adequate dialog with a broad tradition of anti-racist and anti-colonial sociology, history and epistemology, and therefore risks a decontextualized analysis of disparities and under-informed approaches to achieving equity. Fortunately, scholarship from the Black radical tradition (BRT), such as the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP), Critical Race Theory (CRT), and more broadly conceptual frameworks from post-modern, anti-colonial, Black feminist studies and social epistemology can offer to implementation science frameworks that center power dynamics and racialized oppression. This epistemic re-alignment of implementation research to "center at the margins" can enable the field of implementation science to more critically examine and dismantle systems that perpetuate racial inequalities in access to and utilization of health interventions. For example, normalization and dynamic fit, which are thought to be key mechanisms of implementation, are revealed in the light of this tradition of scholarship to be potentially problematic acquiescence to oppressive systems. Drawing from the concept of resistance anchored in the scholarship of the Black radical tradition as well as contemporary social epistemology such as the work of José Medina and Maria Fricker about epistemic justice, the authors further advance that implementation science could make more substantial contributions to the dismantling of racialized systems and actively work toward health justice through the transdisciplinary lens of resistance. This is a call to action for integrating implementation science with critical philosophical and theoretical perspectives rooted in Black studies and related insights, which have been acquired through the struggle for social justice, to inform the design of implementation strategies and research projects that improve health services and health outcomes for health disparity populations.

DEFYING THE ODDS: EXCEPTIONAL HOME HEALTH AGENCIES SERVING HIGH PROPORTIONS OF BLACK PATIENTS

Abstract Healthcare providers with the highest proportions of Black patients are typically assumed to be lower quality, whether they be hospitals, nursing homes, or primary care physicians. However, little research examines the providers that “defy these odds” and rise to the top of the quality ratings. Each year, Medicare home health provides skilled nursing and therapy services to over 3 million homebound older adults with physical and cognitive impairments, and compared to the general Medicare population, Medicare home health patients are more likely to identify as Black. This mixed-methods (QUANT-->QUAL) project uses an assets-based approach as well as the tenets of the Public Health Critical Race Praxis to understand home health providers that are generally assumed to be low-quality providers – that is those who have the highest proportions of Black patients – but instead are high quality providers. This study uses star ratings and the Post-Acute Care Public Use File for home health agencies to characterize and identify agencies with high quality care and a high proportion of Black patients. Publicly available data allows us to characterize the structures and outcomes of these unique home health agencies; while primary data collection (via case studies of exceptional agencies) will allow us to report on their unique processes of care. Data collection and analyses are currently underway and will be completed by May 2023. In 2019, 28% of home health agencies were identified as having high-quality with a high proportion of Black patients, we have selected three agencies for case studies.

Older Black Americans' Perspectives on Structural Racism-Resilience as a Form of Resistance.

The purpose of this study was to develop a deep understanding of the lived experiences of structural racism and discrimination among older Black Americans' and their perceptions of structural racism across their lives. We also considered individual and community resilience capacity and response in the face of systemic racism. In-depth interviews were conducted with Black community-dwelling adults aged 55 and older in and around Baltimore City. The interview guide used nine contexts to explore perceptions and experiences with structural racism over the life course. Two researchers used reflexive thematic analysis to code and analyze the data. Participants endorsed structural racism to varying degrees across contexts of education, employment, neighborhood, healthcare, and income/wealth. Participants who denied structural racism placed blame for Black underachievement on factors such as personal and community deficiencies, unsafe neighborhoods, and institutional indifference. There was broad agreement about the existence of structural racism within the domains of policing and violence but participants were largely ambivalent about other domains such as environment, media, and civics. Resilience factors that helped individuals to resist and rebound from racism emerged as an unexpected and important theme. We used Public Health Critical Race Praxis and the Cells to Society frameworks to contextualize these findings. Due to the ubiquitous nature of racism, individuals may not fully appreciate the impact of structural racism and its impact on Black well-being. This ordinariness of racism is harmful but may simultaneously contribute to resilience within Baltimore's Black community.

Perspectives About Racism and Patient-Clinician Communication Among Black Adults With Serious Illness

Black patients with serious illness experience higher-intensity care at the end of life. Little research has used critical, race-conscious approaches to examine factors associated with these outcomes. To investigate the lived experiences of Black patients with serious illness and how various factors may be associated with patient-clinician communication and medical decision-making. In this qualitative study, one-on-one, semistructured interviews were conducted with 25 Black patients with serious illness hospitalized at an urban academic medical center in Washington State between January 2021 and February 2023. Patients were asked to discuss experiences with racism, how those experiences affected the way they communicated with clinicians, and how racism impacted medical decision-making. Public Health Critical Race Praxis was used as framework and process. The experience and of racism and its association, as described by Black patients who had serious illness, with patient-clinician communication and medical decision-making within a racialized health care setting. A total of 25 Black patients (mean [SD] age, 62.0 [10.3] years; 20 males [80.0%]) with serious illness were interviewed. Participants had substantial socioeconomic disadvantage, with low levels of wealth (10 patients with 0 assets [40.0%]), income (annual income <$25 000 among 19 of 24 patients with income data [79.2%]), educational attainment (mean [SD] 13.4 [2.7] years of schooling), and health literacy (mean [SD] score in the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form, 5.8 [2.0]). Participants reported high levels of medical mistrust and high frequency of discrimination and microaggressions experienced in health care settings. Participants reported epistemic injustice as the most common manifestation of racism: silencing of their own knowledge and lived experiences about their bodies and illness by health care workers. Participants reported that these experiences made them feel isolated and devalued, especially if they had intersecting, marginalized identities, such as being underinsured or unhoused. These experiences were associated with exacerbation of existing medical mistrust and poor patient-clinician communication. Participants described various mechanisms of self-advocacy and medical decision-making based on prior experiences with mistreatment from health care workers and medical trauma. This study found that Black patients' experiences with racism, specifically epistemic injustice, were associated with their perspectives on medical care and decision-making during serious illness and end of life. These findings suggest that race-conscious, intersectional approaches may be needed to improve patient-clinician communication and support Black patients with serious illness to alleviate the distress and trauma of racism as these patients near the end of life.

Applying anti-racist approaches to informatics: a new lens on traditional frames.

Health organizations and systems rely on increasingly sophisticated informatics infrastructure. Without anti-racist expertise, the field risks reifying and entrenching racism in information systems. We consider ways the informatics field can recognize institutional, systemic, and structural racism and propose the use of the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) to mitigate and dismantle racism in digital forms. We enumerate guiding questions for stakeholders along with a PHCRP-Informatics framework. By focusing on (1) critical self-reflection, (2) following the expertise of well-established scholars of racism, (3) centering the voices of affected individuals and communities, and (4) critically evaluating practice resulting from informatics systems, stakeholders can work to minimize the impacts of racism. Informatics, informed and guided by this proposed framework, will help realize the vision of health systems that are more fair, just, and equitable.

Exploring public health education's integration of critical race theories: A scoping review.

Public health has declared a commitment toward diversity as a whole, with a commitment toward addressing and dismantling racism being at the forefront. Although public health has admirably taken on this mission, and the foundational principles of public health align with social justice and health equity, public health as a discipline is vastly behind other fields in integrating and utilizing critical race theorizations. Of particular concern is the lack of critical race theorization within public health education materials. Public health education serves as a precursor to public health practice and situates topics and competencies that are essential to one's foundational public health knowledge and skillset, thus the use of strong theoretical groundings is critical in public health education. Therefore, to explore the current landscape of public health educational research that employs critical race theories, this study sought to conduct a scoping review investigating the current literature of public health pedagogical, instructional, and curricular efforts that utilize race and antiracist theorization principles as a means to administer public health education. More specifically, we sought to investigate how have faculty and instructors published their integration of race theorization in public health curriculum/instruction within the United States since 2011. We found 18 examples from peer-reviewed literature of curricular, pedagogical, or instructional practices and strategies that integrate critical theories of race, including contemplative pedagogy (n = 1), antiracism (n = 3), Public Health Critical Race praxis (n = 4), Critical Race (n = 5), critical service-learning/community engagement (n = 2), ethnic studies (n = 1), and intersectionality (n = 2). These articles present a wide breadth of innovative approaches to infusing critical race studies within public health higher education, ranging from individual assignments to course design and implementation to institutional culture change, thus demonstrating the multifaceted nature of critical race studies within micro-learning communities and macro-discipline practices. Identifying theoretically grounded, exemplary models and scholarly recommendations of pedagogical, instructional, and curricular practices provides readers the opportunity to borrow from successful practices and implement concepts of race, racism, antiracism, intersectionality, and more into their classrooms.

Race-conscious serious illness communication: An interpersonal tool to dismantle racism in practice and research.

Racism significantly contributes to inequitable care quality and outcomes for people of color with serious illness, their families, and their communities. Clinicians use serious illness communication (SIC) to foster trust, elicit patients' needs and values, and deliver goal-concordant services. Current SIC tools do not actively guide users to incorporate patients' experiences with racism into care. 1) To explicitly address racism during SIC in the context of the patient's lived experience and 2) to provide race-conscious SIC recommendations for clinicians and researchers. Applying the conceptual elements of Public Health Critical Race Praxis to SIC practice and research through reflection on inclusive SIC approaches and a composite case. Patients' historical and ongoing narratives of racism must be intentionally welcomed in physically and psychologically safe environments by leveraging empathic communication opportunities, forging antiracist palliative care practices, removing interpersonal barriers to promote transparent patient-clinician relationships, and strengthening organizational commitments to strategically dismantle racism. Race-conscious SIC communication strategies, skills, and examples of talking points are provided. Race-conscious SIC practices may assist to acknowledge racial dynamics within the patient-clinician encounter. Furthermore, race-conscious SIC may help to mitigate implicit and explicit bias in clinical practices and the exclusionary research cultures that guide them.

247 Private equity acquisition of nursing homes and the impact on long stay residents and racial disparities in care outcomes

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To investigate nursing homes (NHs) acquired by private equity (PE) firms and estimate the effect of PE NH acquisitions on NH care quality for NH residents and whether PE NH acquisitions exacerbate racial inequities in quality of care. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: My research estimates the causal effect of NH PE acquisitions on NH access and quality of care for NH residents and whether acquisitions exacerbate racial disparities in NH care for about 115 PE-owned NHs in the US, measuring the quality of care at the facility survey year level, and using an array of NH-level data sources. I identified 115 PE-owned NHs (treatment group) and 665 non-PE-owned NHs between 2003 and 2010, using the Online Survey Certification and Reporting database to obtain facility characteristics. I compare facility characteristics (e.g., payer mix, staffing levels, and quality measures such as pressure ulcers, unexpected weight loss, acuity, and health deficiencies). I will then test whether effects differ by race, with hypotheses informed by Public Health Critical Race Praxis approach. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary results show that staffing levels differ between PE and non-PE-owned NHs in a way that aligns with a shift in focus toward the Medicare population i.e. short stays. We also find that deficiencies increased in PE-owned NHs compared to non-PE-owned NHs. We expect that PE acquisitions may lead to slightly widening racial disparities in NH care quality. Results may show that PE-owned NHs have a higher share of low-rated, high-BIPOC facilities. In weak markets, PE-owned NHs may have a higher share of BIPOC residents compared to highly competitive markets. This is because PE managers may prioritize cost over quality by cutting services. However, since quality measures are self-reported, except for measures related to deficiencies, this predicted lower quality of care may not be evident in observed data. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding how PE ownership impacts nursing home care quality for long-stay residents, especially those funded by Medicaid, can help develop intervention strategies to effectively mitigate racial inequities in NH care, as Medicaid funded NH residents are more likely to be Black, Indigenous, and people of color.

Abstract P650: Addressing Cardiovascular Disease Inequities: Qualitative Process Evaluation From a Co-Investigation With Im/Migrants Exploring How to Sustain a Community-Driven, Social Network Intervention Using a Racism-Conscious Approach

Introduction: Health promotion programs focused on cardiovascular disease are underutilized with im/migrants. The one-time referral to group-based interventions model ignores (1) the complex sociocultural influences on behavior change and (2) the socio-historical context of migration, racialization of immigrants and refugees, and the roles these play in differential social integration of refugees. One solution may be to apply community-based participatory research (CBPR) and Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) to social network interventions with opinion leaders. Yet, these interventions are challenging to scale. There is a critical need to understand how to scale community-driven social network interventions to effectively address cardiovascular disease inequities resulting from systemic racism experienced by im/migrant populations. Developed using CBPR and informed by PHCRP, this work builds upon Healthy Immigrant Community (HIC), a collaborative effort between Latinx and Somali im/migrant partners and Rochester Healthy Community Partnership. Our aim is to explore opinion leader recruitment, their characteristics, and expectations for HIC scale-up. Qualitative Hypothesis: Learning more about the opinion leaders’ background and experience in the Healthy Immigrant Community social network intervention will prepare us for a future efficacy study. Methods: We conducted a process evaluation by: (1) interviewing community partners who recruited opinion leaders (n=8) and (2) conducting three pre-intervention focus groups with opinion leaders (Latinx n=4; Somali women n=8; Somali men n=8). We used PHCRP to deductively form codes yet allowed for new ideas that arose from the data by inductively generating additional codes. Results: Interview participants described their decision-making process, qualities considered, recruitment strategies, and expectations for an implementation study. Focus group participants discussed their personal motivations for participation, how they hoped the study would help their community, and the barriers to health they experience because of structural determinism (macro-level forces that sustain inequities). Conclusions: This work will enhance our ability to translate HIC to other communities by expanding our knowledge of opinion leader characteristics that are important in a community-driven, social network intervention. Because social network interventions have been demonstrated to cause positive behavior change, further adapting these interventions in a community setting would be expected to provide a more effective approach compared to individually targeted behavior change strategies. Additionally, selecting OLs is neither time nor resource intensive and could enhance organizational strategies for implementing health promotion programming.

A Public Health Critical Race Praxis Informed Congestive Heart Failure Quality Improvement Initiative on Inpatient General Medicine.

Prior evaluation at our hospital demonstrated that, compared to White patients, Black and Latinx patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) were less likely to be admitted to the cardiology service rather than the general medicine service (GMS). Patients admitted to GMS (compared to cardiology) had inferior rates of cardiology follow-up and 30-day readmission. To develop and test the feasibility and impacts of using quality improvement (QI) methods, in combination with the Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) framework, to engage stakeholders in developing an intervention for ensuring guideline-concordant inpatient CHF care across all patient groups. We compared measures for all patients admitted with CHF to GMS between September 2019 and March 2020 (intervention group) to CHF patients admitted to GMS in the previous year (pre-intervention group) and those admitted to cardiology during the pre-intervention and intervention periods (cardiology group). Our primary measures were 30-day readmissions and 14- and 30-day post-discharge cardiology follow-up. There were 79 patients admitted with CHF to GMS during the intervention period, all of whom received the intervention. There were similar rates of Black and Latinx patients across the three groups. Compared to pre-intervention, intervention patients had a significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (18.9% vs. 24.8%; p=0.024), though the cardiology group also had a decrease in 30-day readmissions from the pre-intervention to intervention period. Compared to pre-intervention, intervention patients had significantly higher 14-day and 30-day post-discharge follow-up visits scheduled with cardiology (36.7% vs. 24.8%, p=0.005; 55.7% vs. 42.3%, p=0.0029), but no improvement in appointment attendance. This study provides a first test of applying the PHCRP framework within a stakeholder-engaged QI initiative for improving CHF care across races and ethnicities. Our study design cannot evaluate causation. However, the improvements in 30-day readmission, as well as in processes of care that may affect it, provide optimism that inclusion of a racism-conscious framework in QI initiatives is feasible and may enhance QI measures.

Optimizing the Equitable Deployment of Virtual Care for Women: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Examining Patient and Provider Perspectives Supplemented with Primary Qualitative Data.

Women experience numerous barriers to patient-centered health care (e.g., lack of continuity). Such barriers are amplified for women from marginalized communities. Virtual care may improve equitable access. We are conducting a partner-engaged, qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) of patients' and providers' experiences with virtual health care delivery for women. We use a best-fit framework approach informed by the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework and Public Health Critical Race Praxis. We will supplement published literature with qualitative interviews with women from underrepresented communities and their health care providers. We will engage patients and other contributors through multiple participatory methods. Our search identified 5525 articles published from 2010 to 2022. Sixty were eligible, of which 42 focused on women and 24 on provider experiences. Data abstraction and analysis are ongoing. This work offers four key innovations to advance health equity: (1) conceptual foundation rooted in an antiracist action-oriented praxis; (2) worked example of centering QES on marginalized communities; (3) supplementing QES with primary qualitative information with populations historically marginalized in the health care system; and (4) participatory approaches that foster longitudinal partnered engagement. Our approach to exploring virtual health care for women demonstrates an antiracist praxis to inform knowledge generation. In doing so, we aim to generate findings that can guide health care systems in the equitable deployment of comprehensive virtual care for women.

Mitigating the Spread of COVID-19: Differential Perceptions of Midwestern University Students.

Racially minoritized groups have disproportionately borne the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in America. We draw on Public Health Critical Race Praxis to investigate racial differences in college students' attitudes about mitigation efforts to limit the spread of COVID-19 and concerns about one's own and others' actions in these efforts. We used survey data from a random sample of Midwestern undergraduates (n = 620) who participated in a fall 2020 COVID-19 study; chi-square tests and logistic regression modeling were employed. Students of color were more likely than white students to report mitigation strategies as not sufficiently restrictive and that communities ought to prioritize limiting the spread of COVID-19. Students of color were also more likely to be concerned that the actions of others were spreading COVID-19. Universities need to continuously ask how their policies and practices acknowledge the broader racial context and seek the perspectives of diverse students.

Impact of structural racism on inclusion and diversity in precision oncology: A scoping and critical review of the literature.

Inclusion and diversity in precision oncology are essential in reducing cancer disparities among racial and ethnic groups. However, present studies have favored the recruitment and participation of Whites, with limited applicability of their results to minority groups. Many reasons for their underrepresentation are downstream manifestations of structural racism. Therefore, this scoping review provides a precise mapping of recruitment and participation barriers for minorities in precision oncology that are associated with structural racism, including a critical appraisal of how disciplinary norms, paradigms, and tools used therein could inadvertently contribute to unforeseen inclusion and diversity challenges. Empirical and theoretical publications from Web of Science and PubMed were searched and analyzed to identify recruitment and participation barriers for minorities in precision oncology. In addition, using the public health critical race praxis (PHCRP) as guiding analytical framework, empirical studies were analyzed to identify unforeseen barriers resulting from simplification processes, assumptions, norms, paradigms, and tools used during the research process. One-hundred thirty-five barriers to recruitment and participation were identified or reported in included publications. They were subsequently categorized as being a manifestation of one of the following forms of racism, namely internalized, interpersonal, institutional, and structural racism. The PCHRP analysis revealed four additional factors to be considered in precision oncology studies in ensuring appropriate representation of their study populations. Future interventions aimed at reducing health disparities should focus predominantly on barriers associated with structural and institutional racism, which should then have ripple effects on other forms of racism. Importantly, the four factors identified through the PHCRP framework could further explain the lower participation rates of minorities in precision oncology and related activities. Therefore, they should be given due consideration by all stakeholders involved in the precision oncology ecosystem, from researchers and healthcare professionals to policy-makers, research ethics committees, and funders.

Adjustment.

The adult spine, aka backbone, is composed of 24 segments. Separately, each segment is incapable of animating our bodies. Communities of color, low-income communities, and other marginalized groups represent the backbone of the health equity research enterprise-it literally cannot exist without our bodies and what they are subjected to in the face of structural inequality. And more often than not, researchers believe they can break our bodies into discrete segments and somehow animate a body of literature capable of healing a whole us. This poem, as counternarrative and enactment of public health critical race praxis principles of "voice" and "disciplinary self-critique", engages the spine as metaphor to name and render visible the epistemic and symbolic violences that prop up public health's body of evidence/knowledge. In doing so, it challenges the field's dominant knowledge production paradigm (e.g. positivist reductionism), and draws attention to the settlercolonial, racial-capitalist, and extractivist logics of racial and health equity discourses dominated by narratives produced by mostly White scholars and "health equity tourists", often using complex statistical techniques to complete secondary quantitative analyses about health in communities they've never stepped a single foot in. Under this paradigm, scores of researchers/practitioners are led to believe that they can somehow come to "know" us via variables and models alone. This poem suggests that-more than anything else-this model of practice is what's most in need of adjustment, and warrants a greater degree of ethical scrutiny than historically/presently afforded. To view the original version of this poem, see the supplemental material section of this article online.

Understanding Black women’s experiences with genetic services for ovarian cancer: A qualitative study (435)

<b>Objectives:</b> Studies have consistently demonstrated that Black women with ovarian cancer are less likely to obtain guideline- recommended genetic testing than other racial/ethnic groups. The current study sought to explore Black women's experience with genetic testing during ovarian cancer care from the perspective of patients, providers, and genetic counselors. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i>=20) with five patients, six physicians, four advanced practice providers, and five genetic counselors. The study was designed using Anderson's Behavioral Model and the Public Health Critical Race Praxis as theoretical frameworks to inform our research design, data collection, and interpretation. Data were recorded, transcribed, and coded, and framework analysis was used to identify themes. <b>Results:</b> All five of the patients in the study completed genetic testing. For the providers, uptake of genetic services varied according to the practice location but ranged from 50-80% for genetic counseling and 40-95% for genetic testing. Most providers in our study felt that rates of genetic counseling and testing were similar for Black women compared to other racial/ethnic groups in their practice, except those providers who cared for Black ovarian cancer patients at safety-net hospitals. Four themes emerged from the data. First, participants felt that all women are too overwhelmed to prioritize genetic testing, but Black women also have daily experiences with racism that adds additional complexity to navigating cancer care. Second, Black women are unable to access genetic testing due to socioeconomic disadvantages related to a long history of structural racism in the U.S. Third, Black women may be unwilling to complete genetic testing due to mistrust of providers and the healthcare system. Finally, Black women are less likely to receive genetic services prior to their ovarian cancer diagnosis due to cultural barriers and provider misconceptions about Black women's hereditary cancer risk. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings highlight that Black ovarian cancer patients are less likely to obtain genetic counseling and testing due to experiences with individual and structural racism<i>.</i> To increase uptake of genetic testing, it is critical that providers prioritize communication and patient education that is culturally responsive to the needs of Black women, as well as offer social supports to help Black women navigate their cancer care. Given the prevalence of hereditary cancer syndromes in ovarian cancer patients, as well as the impact that identification of a mutation has on cancer prevention, treatment, and survival, it is critical to ensure that genetic services are provided equitably to all women. Therefore, gynecologic oncology providers need education about the unique barriers Black women face in accessing genetic services so we may increase opportunities to provide guideline-concordant genetic services to Black women.

Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.

Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics. This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers. We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software. A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact. The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions. These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.

Engaging Public Health Critical Race Praxis in Local Social Determinants of Health Research: The Youth Health Equity and Action Research Training Program in Portland, OR-yHEARTPDX.

The social determinants of health (SDH) have long been considered a core mechanism through which racial health inequities are (re)produced and incubated in the U.S. Moreover, scholars have expressly—and appropriately—named structural racism as a precursor to inequities associated with SDH. However, while research on racial health inequities—SDH-related or otherwise—continues to grow, communities of color remain grossly underrepresented as public health researchers and practitioners. Additionally, although SDH are experienced in a very local sense, much research and practice fails to more deeply and thoroughly engage and center local community knowledges. Thus, much work around SDH and racial health inequities presents, ironically, as structurally racist itself—being done/led mostly by White scholars and in ways that do not “center the margins”. Moreover, in the context of public health practice, youth perspective is seldom centered within local health department (LHD) community SDH assessment efforts. With these challenges in mind, this paper introduces and discusses the development of the youth health equity and action research training (yHEART) program as a model for public health researchers/practitioners to engage public health critical race praxis (PHCRP) to better understand and respond to local SDH in communities of color. Specifically, we highlight the significance of PHCRP principles of “voice” and “social construction of knowledge” in advancing antiracism in research and LHD practice related to local SDH. First, we articulate core conceptual and theoretical groundings that informed the yHEART program’s development and animate its ongoing training and research activities. Second, we outline the program’s core training components and overall process, and provide some brief illustrative examples of work completed during the program’s first iteration—yHEART PDX, Vol.I: Youth Participatory Research on Local Social Determinants of Health. We then close with a discussion that reflects on program strengths, challenges, and implications for SDH and racial health equity research/practice in light of growing calls for an antiracist public health.

Black & Mild: A Tutorial, After the CDC.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that smoking causes ~480,000 U.S. deaths annually. Many of these deaths are ultimately coded within "heart disease" and "cancer" deaths-the United States' top two causes of death. These deaths represent aggregations of dozens of distinct International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. COVID-19 has also killed ~480,000 Americans annually. Yet its codes are much more limited/specific-such that COVID-19 might well be the singular leading cause of death in the United States. And yet here we are: 2+ years of pandemic and the CDC not only acting like it can't do math, but actively clearing paths for continued disease/death. This poem, crafted as counternarrative to the superficially apolitical (re/in)actions of the CDC, enacts the public health critical race praxis principle of "disciplinary self-critique" to suggest that the CDC has indeed aligned itself with neoliberal racial capitalism in an unapologetic endorsement/enactment of necropolitics. It draws from a rich archive of Black music that thematically engages smoking as ritual, resistance, and practice of community, as well as metaphor for/of transcendence and self-love in the face of structural violence and thinly-veiled necropolitical sacrifice at the altar of neoliberal public health-an altar long-built from the blood and bones of the "sick and tired." Or, if you prefer, the lungs and breath of the "mild." In the face of all the resources-financial and regulatory-governmental public health uses to keep us from smoking, vaping, and getting high, apparently, it's the CDC that is high-so high it is no longer able/willing to see the foundations of social justice that anchor our field. To view the original version of this poem, see the supplemental material section of this article online.