There is no biological basis for racial categories. Yet, the presentation of racialized stimuli impacts psycholinguistic processing, suggesting that a talker’s racial identity affects measures of intelligibility (Babel & Russell, 2015; McGowan, 2015). Previous work has used static visual primes, presenting images accompanied by acoustic sentence stimuli. Static visual primes may prime expectations of the person’s speech, with unexpected pairings decreasing intelligibility. These findings show that social expectations affect speech intelligibility and have broad implications for real-world speech perception in high-stakes educational (Evans, Munson, & Edwards, 2017), social (Purnell, Baugh, & Idsardi, 1999), and legal (Rickford & King, 2016) contexts. Expanding our understanding of the psycholinguistic and psychophysical mechanisms behind these phenomena requires experimentation with dynamic, audiovisual speech rather than static visuals. The current experiment presents conflicting visual and auditory cues indexing the white and Black racial identities of the talkers. The talker who is seen (the ‘visual’ talker) and the racial identity of the talker who is heard (the ‘audio’ talker) are fully crossed. This design allows us to examine how intelligibility is influenced by visual racial identity, audio racial identity, and the audiovisual (mis)match between them. Data collection is currently in progress and includes groups of both white and Black listeners.