Psychological Interventions For Parents Research Articles

Psychological Impact of Caregiving for Children With Eye Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

To identify and characterize the psychological impact of caregiving for children with eye disease. Awareness of the caregiving experience and insight into the factors related to caregiver burden is necessary to support high-quality ophthalmic care and develop supportive interventions. The databases MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Google Scholar were queried up to June 25, 2021. Studies included assessed the psychological impact of providing care to children with eye diseases. A risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Modified Downs and Black Checklist. Demographic data and measures of burden were extracted and tabulated. A total of 2,823 articles were screened, 28 underwent data extraction, and 7 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated significant levels of burden (40% mild, 95% CI: [0.28 to 0.53]; 59% moderate, 95% CI: [0.36 to 0.82]; 7% severe, 95% CI: [0.02 to 0.11]) and depression (26% mild, 95% CI: [0.17 to 0.35]; 8% moderate, 95% CI: [0.03 to 0.14]); 11% severe, 95% CI:[0.03 to 0.10]). Interventions such as educational programs, life skills training programs, and other home-based early intervention programs were shown to improve psychological well-being of families. Caregivers experience significant levels of burden and depression, which may, in turn, affect the level of ophthalmic care they can provide for their children. Further studies investigating educational or psychological interventions for parents are needed, because the small number of studies that investigated these types of interventions have reported reduced parental stress and improved well-being. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(4):238-247.].

Parents and Adolescents: What’s the Right Mix in Obesity Treatment?

Successful obesity treatment hinges on helping the patient shift to a healthier lifestyle in the context of their environment. For adolescents, this means taking into account their current health status and developmental stage in the context of family, peer, and societal influences. Parents play a pivotal role in helping adolescents negotiate the transition to adulthood, and their involvement is essential in obesity treatment. In this issue of Pediatrics , Bean et al,1 in a systematic review, identify how parents are included in adolescent obesity treatment and “which elements of parental involvement are positively associated with adolescent weight loss.” The studies they examine involve a wide range of intervention strategies that were designed to promote weight loss by addressing diet and exercise behaviors and included a parent component. In this review, the authors raise important questions for future study and highlight the lack of consistent and specific information about parental interventions in adolescent obesity treatment. The authors identify the need for research to further explore the specific role of parents in terms, their adherence to recommendations, and their own lifestyle behaviors and examine the association of parent and adolescent outcomes in longer and more diverse trials. They also note the need for future studies to examine the link between specific parental interventions and adolescent weight loss.1 In addition … Address correspondence to Sandra G. Hassink, MD, 2602 Pennington Dr, Wilmington, DE 19810. E-mail: shassink{at}aap.net

Parent training programmes for managing infantile colic.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of parent training programmes for managing colic in infants under four months of age. To identify the educational content and attributes of such published programmes.

Evaluation of Psychological Intervention for Parents of Adolescents

Evaluation of Psychological Intervention for Parents of Adolescents

The interdependence of posttraumatic stress symptoms in parental dyads during and after their child’s treatment for cancer

Background: Cancer in a child is highly distressing and some parents are at increased risk for developing posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). However, the interdependence of PTSS in parental dyads has rarely been accounted for. The aim was to explore the dyadic relationship of PTSS in parents of children diagnosed with cancer.Material and methods: The sample includes 150 parents (75 dyads) of 75 children diagnosed with cancer in Sweden during 2002–2004, with follow-up until one year after end of treatment. Data on PTSS from six assessments were included. The first three assessments were carried out during treatment and the remaining after end of treatment. Actor-partner interdependence models were estimated using a structural equation modeling approach to explore the dyadic relationship of PTSS. Actor effects refer to intra-individual dependency over time, and partner effects refer to inter-individual dependency over time, i.e., how much an individual’s symptom levels are affected by their partner’s symptom levels at the previous assessment.Results: Results show both actor and partner effects during the child’s treatment. Only an actor effect remained following end of treatment where level of PTSS at one assessment was associated with the level of PTSS at the subsequent assessment. The association between mothers’ and fathers’ PTSS did not remain after end of treatment.Conclusions: Parents appear to react as an interdependent emotional system during the child’s treatment but this effect disappears after end of treatment. Results suggest psychological interventions for parents during the child’s cancer treatment should also be sensitive to and address the influence that distress in one partner may have on the other.

325 Development and evaluation of an internet-based psychological intervention for parents of children with cystic fibrosis

325 Development and evaluation of an internet-based psychological intervention for parents of children with cystic fibrosis L. Goldbeck1, C. Knaevelsrud2, C. Lehmann3, C. Weiss3, A. Fidika1, M. Herle1. 1University Ulm Medical Centre, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm, Germany; 2Free University Berlin, Clinical Psychology, Berlin, Germany; 3Charite − University Hospital, Christiane-Herzog-Centre, Berlin, Germany