Psoriasis Registry Research Articles

Psoriasis localization patterns in the Swiss Psoriasis Registry (SDNTT) over 11 years: an analysis by sex and age

Real-world data on anatomically localized psoriasis and its response to systemic therapy across different age-groups and sexes is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the severity and distribution of psoriasis over time in female and male patients receiving systemic therapies, categorized by age within the Swiss psoriasis registry (SDNTT). Patient-data was obtained over 11 years through the SDNTT. The localized Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (locPASI) of the head, trunk, upper and lower extremities was analyzed over two years following the start of systemic non-/biologic treatment. A total of 316 female and 517 male patients were analyzed. Male patients had a higher baseline locPASI for legs, trunk and arms (p < 0.001), but not for the head (p = 0.961). The locPASI for the head in younger female patients (18–40 years) had a higher score than those aged 55 + (p = 0.022) and after two years, middle aged (41–54) showed a lower score compared to younger patients (p = 0.045). Younger male patients revealed a lower score after two years of therapy in the leg- and arm-area compared to older (p = 0.018 and p = 0.048, respectively). Female patients on non-biologics had a fast initial response, converging with male patients’ scores over 24 months. Over 75% locPASI reduction was observed for female head-area (81.4%), male trunk (82.7%) and legs (76.1%). Absolute locPASI ≤ 2 was achieved 3–6 months for all locations with interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23 and IL-23-inhibitors, except for the legs of male patients on anti-IL-17 and female patients on anti-IL-12/23 and -IL-23. After two years, male patients did not achieve a locPASI ≤ 2 for any biologic-treatment in the legs, nor for the arms on anti-TNF-α. Significant disparities in localized PASI were observed between female and male patients. The age, sex and severity of distinct localizations should be considered to optimize treatment goals.

Impact of Disease Factors of Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis on Biologic Therapy Switching: Real-World Evidence from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

Patients with psoriasis (PSO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may frequently switch biologic therapies over the course of treatment because of symptom variability and individual responses. Real-world studies analyzing patient characteristics and clinical factors associated with biologic switching are limited. This longitudinal cohort study used real-world data from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry to evaluate the relationship between associated disease factors and biologic switching among patients with PSO and PsA in the United States (US) and Canada following initiation of a biologic. Patients were evaluated between April 2015-August 2022. Combinations of disease severity (as measured by Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI]) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) as a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed, and the association with time to switching was calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Among 2580 patient-initiations (instances of patients initiating a biologic), 504 (19.5%) switched biologics within 30months of initiation. Switching was more frequent when either PASI > 10 or DLQI > 5 compared with PASI ≤ 10 or DLQI ≤ 5 at follow-up. Patients with higher skin involvement (PASI > 10) and impact on HRQoL (DLQI > 5) were 14 times more likely to switch (hazard ratio = 14.2, 95% confidence interval: 10.7, 18.9) than those with lower skin involvement (PASI ≤ 10) and HRQoL (DLQI ≤ 5). Patients with PSO and PsA treated in a real-world dermatology setting with substantial disease factors following biologic initiation were more likely to switch therapies. Those with PASI > 10 and DLQI > 5 switched more frequently than those with PASI ≤ 10 and DLQI ≤ 5.

Impact of Disease Burden of Patients with Psoriasis on Biologic Therapy Switching: Real-World Evidence from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

Due to variable psoriasis symptoms, disease progression, and individual responses to therapy, patients may start, stop, or switch biologic therapies. Real-world data on the associated disease burden of patients with psoriasis who do and do not switch biologics are incomplete. This study compared disease burden among patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (July 2017-December 2021) who switched biologics and those who did not within 4-12months following initiation. Disease-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded, including skin pain, itching, activity impairment, and effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Disease severity was measured by body surface area (BSA) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were used to compare study outcome measures between the two groups. This study included 2145 patients, with 159 classified as switchers and 1986 as non-switchers. The most common reason for switching therapy was failure to maintain initial response (51.7%; n = 78). Moderate-to-severe disease (BSA ≥ 3) was found among 83.0% (n = 132) of switchers versus 26.1% (n = 516) of non-switchers. PASI > 5 was reported among 49.7% (n = 79) of switchers versus 8.6% (n = 171) of non-switchers. Differences in skin pain, itching, and effects on HRQoL between switchers and non-switchers were larger in magnitude for bio-experienced patients. Patients who switched biologic therapy experienced a greater disease burden of psoriasis across PROs than non-switchers. Patient-centered factors may be important drivers of biologic switching. Our findings suggest the association between switching and disease burden may be stronger among patients with prior biologic therapy experience.

A 14-year registry review (2007-2020) on nail involvement among patients with psoriasis in Malaysia

Nail psoriasis affects 20 to 30% of psoriasis patients and is an early predictor of psoriatic arthropathy (PsA). We have evaluated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and impact on quality of life of patients with nail psoriasis.We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study was of patients registered with The Malaysian Psoriasis Registry (MPR) from 1 January 1, 2007 through 31 December 31, 2020.Of the 24147 patients, 13081 (54.2%) had nail psoriasis. Patients with nail psoriasis had la ater onset of psoriasis (34.0±16.6 vs 32.9±17.6 years, p<0.001) and longer disease duration (11.4±10.5 vs 8.5±9.4 years, p<0.01), with a male to female ratio of 1.2:1. They were more likely to have a family history of psoriasis, cardiometabolic diseases, smoking history, higher body mass index, severe disease, PsA, face and scalp involvement and higher mean Dermatology Life Quality Index scores (9.36±6.84 vs 8.87±6.60). Systemic treatment and biologics were more commonly prescribed in this cohort (25.0% vs 13.2%, p<0.001).Overall, 54.2% of the MPR patients had nail involvement. Nail psoriasis was associated with longer duration of psoriasis, older age of onset, male gender, and a family history of psoriasis. It proved to be an important predictor for PsA, severe psoriasis, face and scalp involvement, increased cardiometabolic risk, and a greater impairment of quality of life.

54148 Characteristics of Real-world Patients With Psoriasis Prescribed Guselkumab or Interleukin-17 Inhibitors: Data From the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR)

54148 Characteristics of Real-world Patients With Psoriasis Prescribed Guselkumab or Interleukin-17 Inhibitors: Data From the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR)

51447 Long Term Real-World Achievement of Skin Clearance Treatment Targets and Maintenance of Response with Risankizumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: 2-year Results from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry

51447 Long Term Real-World Achievement of Skin Clearance Treatment Targets and Maintenance of Response with Risankizumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: 2-year Results from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry

Real-world safety and efficacy of biologics in elderly patients with psoriasis: A multicenter observational study.

Clinical trials of biologics have frequently excluded elderly patients, resulting in inadequate data on their safety and efficacy. Additionally, evidence of their safety and efficacy remains limited, despite some real-world studies. To assess the safety and efficacy of biologics in elderly patients with psoriasis, we compared these outcomes in younger patients using data from the West Japan Psoriasis Registry (WJPR). The WJPR consists of approximately 30 facilities in Western Japan, including various healthcare settings. This study enrolled 1395 patients who participated in the 2022 follow-up survey of the WJPR and were either using or had used biologics during the survey. These included 456 patients in the elderly group (≥65 years) and 939 patients in the younger group (<65 years). Treatment-ending adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 15.8% and 11.3% of elderly and younger patients, respectively. The incidence rate per 1000 patient-years (PY) for TEAEs was significantly higher in elderly patients than in younger patients (32.9 vs 23.2, p = 0.0234). Infectious diseases were more prevalent in the elderly group than the younger group; however, no significant difference in the frequency of infectious diseases was found between the two groups (p = 0.0807). Malignant neoplasms occurred significantly more frequently in the elderly group than in the younger group (p = 0.0169). Our results indicate a few concerns about infection when prescribing biologics to elderly patients. Biologics were effective for both elderly and younger patients. We found no significant differences in the proportion of patients with a body surface area score ≤3%, Physician's Global Assessment score 0/1, or Patient's Global Assessment score 0/1, as well as in the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Itch Numerical Rating Scale between the younger and the elderly groups. Overall, our results confirm the appropriateness of using biologics in elderly patients with regard to safety and efficacy.

Basic Susceptibility of Patients with Psoriasis under Systemic Therapy for Respiratory Infections: Data from the German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest.

Background: Patients with psoriasis under systemic treatments are in focus regarding their susceptibility to respiratory infections. To analyse real-world data for respiratory infections in patients with psoriasis under systemic treatments. Methods: We analysed data of the prospective, non-interventional German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest and compared rates for respiratory infections of 13,823 patients on systemic treatments for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis in different therapy cohorts before the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: In total, 1415 respiratory infections were observed in 970 patients. Significant differences were observed between biologics and non-biologics, but not within these groups. The highest event rates (events/100 patient years) were identified for TNF-α inhibitors, 8.1, (CI 7.4-8.9), followed by 7.0 for IL-17 inhibitors (6.2-7.9), 5.7 for IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors (5.1-6.5), 4.8 for methotrexate (4.3-5.4), 3.7 for small molecules (3.3-4.2), and 2.7 for retinoids (1.2-5.1). Conclusions: Overall, the susceptibility for respiratory infections in patients under systemic therapy for psoriasis is low compared to published study data and is sufficient as comparative data for COVID-19 studies.

Six-Month Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Ixekizumab After Switching from IL-23 Inhibitors and Other Biologic Therapies: The CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

Prior work showed that patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry who had previously failed a prior biologic and then initiated ixekizumab demonstrated improvements in disease severity and patient-reported outcomes after 6 months. However, newer therapies such as interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i) were not considered. Here, with more recent data including IL-23i, 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab following a switch from any biologic was assessed as well as whether 6-month effectiveness of ixekizumab was impacted by prior biologic class. We included CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry patients who initiated ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic therapy and had a corresponding 6-month follow-up visit following ixekizumab initiation (N = 743, 2016-2023). Immediate prior biologic class was categorized as tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i, n = 405), non-ixekizumab interleukin-17i (IL-17i, n = 237), or IL-23i (n = 101). Adjusted mean changes in body surface area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), itch, and skin pain were calculated for prior biologic class groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Proportions achieving ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1, and DLQI 0/1 were calculated for all patients and compared among prior biologic classes via relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable modified Poisson regression. Mean improvements in BSA, DLQI, itch, and skin pain, were 7.6, 3.6, 23.3, and 16.7, respectively, for ixekizumab patients who switched from TNFi or IL-12/23i (all p <0.05); 6.8, 3.3, 19.6, and 14.1, respectively, for those who switched from non-ixekizumab IL-17i (all p <0.05); and 7.8, 3.4, 22.2, and 12.8, respectively, for those who switched from IL-23i (all p <0.05). Overall, 54%, 41%, and 31% of ixekizumab initiators achieved PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively, 50% maintained or achieved IGA 0/1, and 48% maintained or achieved DLQI 0/1. The prior TNFi or IL-12/23i group was 31% more likely to achieve PASI100 (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.01, 1.69) and 32% more likely to maintain or achieve IGA 0/1 (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.11, 1.57), but not significantly more likely to achieve PASI90. The prior IL-23i group was 45% more likely to achieve PASI90 (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.10, 1.91), 55% more likely to achieve PASI100 (RR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.12, 2.13), and 39% more likely to maintain or achieve IGA 0/1 (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.12, 1.73) compared to the prior non-ixekizumab IL-17i group. Achievement of PASI75 and DLQI 0/1 was consistent across the prior TNFi or IL-12/23i, IL-23i, and non-ixekizumab IL-17i groups. These updated findings with IL-23i data reaffirm that patients with psoriasis who switch to ixekizumab after discontinuing another biologic demonstrate improvement in disease severity and patient-reported outcomes at 6 months in real-world settings. Compared to patients who switched from another IL-17i, patients who switched class from a TNFi or IL-12/23i were more likely to achieve PASI100 and IGA 0/1, and patients who switched class from an IL-23i were more likely to achieve PASI90 in addition to PASI100 and IGA 0/1.

Racial/ethnic differences in biologic treatment patterns among patients with psoriasis: A prospective analysis of patients in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry

Racial/ethnic differences in biologic treatment patterns among patients with psoriasis: A prospective analysis of patients in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry

Brodalumab: 5-Year US Pharmacovigilance Report.

Brodalumab is a human interleukin-17 receptor A antagonist indicated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy and have failed to respond or have lost response to other systemic therapies. Although the US prescribing information for brodalumab includes a boxed warning regarding suicidal ideation and behavior, no causal association has been demonstrated. Here, we summarize 5years of pharmacovigilance data, from August 15, 2017, through August 14, 2022, reported to Ortho Dermatologics by US patients and healthcare providers. Prevalence of the most common adverse events (AEs) listed in the brodalumab package insert (incidence ≥ 1%) and AEs of special interest are described. Brodalumab exposure was estimated as the time from the first to last prescription-dispensing authorization dates. Data were collected from 4744 patients in the USA, with an estimated exposure of 5815 patient-years. Over 5years, 11 cases of adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events were reported (0.23 events/100 patients), a rate lower than that experienced by patients in the international Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry. There were 106 serious infections. No serious fungal infections were reported. There were 40 confirmed and 2 suspected COVID-19 cases, with no new COVID-19-related deaths. Of 49 reported malignancies among 42 patients, 3 were deemed possibly related to brodalumab. No completed suicides and no new suicidal attempts were reported. Five-year pharmacovigilance data are consistent with the established safety profile reported in long-term clinical trials and previous pharmacovigilance reports, with no new safety signals.

Systemic therapy for psoriasis and the risk of cutaneous infections.

Systemic treatments are important for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis; however, they may occasionally cause adverse infectious events. Although the risk of severe infections with psoriatic treatments is well established, little is known about cutaneous infections. Therefore, we studied the frequency of cutaneous infections in patients with psoriasis who underwent biologic treatment. A total of 878 patients (237 females and 641 males) were analyzed in this follow-up survey conducted in 2020 and based on the Western Japan Psoriasis Registry. The observed skin phenotypes were psoriasis vulgaris (83.3%), pustular psoriasis (7.5%), and psoriatic arthritis (28.9%). The most frequently prescribed systemic drug was apremilast (11.3%), followed by ixekizumab (11.0%), risankizumab (10.9%), and secukinumab (10.4%). The incidence of cutaneous bacterial infections was 12 (1.37% of the total patients), with cellulitis being the most common (8/12, 67%). The incidence of viral infections was 11 (1.25%) including the most common, herpes zoster (9/11, 82%); and that of fungal infections was 45 (5.13%) including 33 (73%) and seven (16%) patients with trichophytosis and oral candidiasis, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that cutaneous bacterial infections were frequently observed in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-α (odds raio [OR] 9.917, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.069-47.572, p = 0.004) and interleukin (IL)-17 (OR 10.798, 95% CI 2.35-49.616, p = 0.002) inhibitor treatments. A history of otitis media and treatment with oral medications (OR 4.50, 95% CI 1.281-15.804, p = 0.019 and OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.141-12.679, p = 0.03 respectively) were associated with a higher ORs for cutaneous viral infections. Furthermore, age and use of IL-17 inhibitors were associated with elevated ORs for fungal infections. In conclusion, our study reveals that systemic therapies may increase the risk of cutaneous viral infections. Therefore, dermatologists should exercise caution in this regard.

P176 Ixekizumab significantly improves nail disease and adjacent joint tenderness and swelling in psoriatic arthritis

Abstract Background/Aims Nail psoriasis (PsO) is a strong predictor for the development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and has been reported in 63-83% of patients with PsA. Psoriatic nails are linked to arthritis in the adjacent distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) of fingers or interphalangeal joint of thumbs, and both can lead to severe functional impairment. In the SPIRIT-H2H study of adults with PsA, 354 of 566 participants had nail PsO and adjacent joint disease in at least one digit at baseline. At the group level, SPIRIT-H2H patients treated with ixekizumab (IXE) achieved significantly greater improvements in nail PsO compared to those treated with adalimumab (ADA). This analysis aimed to assess the treatment effects of IXE and ADA at the individual digit level among patients with PsA, nail PsO, and adjacent joint disease. Methods This post hoc analysis included 354 patients from SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) treated with either IXE (N = 186) or ADA (N = 168) who had nail PsO (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) total score &amp;gt;0) and adjacent joint disease (tenderness and/or swelling) in at least one digit at baseline. Treatment effects were assessed for each individual finger unit displaying nail PsO and adjacent joint disease; here, finger unit defines the nail and adjacent joint of an individual digit; adjacent joint refers to the DIP of fingers or the interphalangeal joint of thumbs. Nail PsO was measured using NAPSI in the fingers only. Joint involvement was measured by tender/swollen joint count scores (TJC68/SJC66). Patients were evaluated for both nail and joint involvement at baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52. Proportions of finger units with resolution of nail PsO, and proportions of finger units with resolution of adjacent joint disease were analyzed using Chi-square tests. Non-responder imputation was used to handle missing data. Results There were 1309 (IXE=639, ADA=670) finger units affected by nail and adjacent joint disease at baseline. Resolution of psoriatic nail disease and resolution of adjacent tenderness and/or swelling of the finger unit was significantly higher with IXE vs ADA at all post-baseline assessments over 52 weeks. Joint tenderness was resolved in a significantly larger proportion of IXE-treated finger units vs ADA at all post-baseline assessments over 52 weeks. Joint swelling was resolved in a larger proportion of IXE-treated finger units vs ADA, and these differences reached statistical significance at all visits except Week 16 and Week 40. The tenderness and/or swelling of the finger unit resolved more rapidly than the adjacent nail disease. Conclusion IXE treatment showed a significant advantage over ADA in resolving nail PsO, joint tenderness, and joint swelling among the finger units with nail and adjacent joint disease of patients with PsA. Disclosure D. McGonagle: Consultancies; D. McGonagle has received consulting fees and/or honoraria and/or research grants from: AbbVie and Eli Lilly and Company. A. Kavanaugh: Consultancies; A. Kavanaugh has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. I. McInnes: Corporate appointments; Vice Principle &amp; Head of College for University of Glasgow, non-executive board member of NHS Greater Glasgow &amp; Clyde, non-executive director of Evelo, and trustee of Versus Arthritis. Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cabaletta Bio, Causeway Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, and UCB Pharma. L. Kristensen: Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharpe &amp; Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. J. Merola: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma. B. Strober: Corporate appointments; Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis and scientific co-director and investigator for CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry. Consultancies; AbbVie, Alamar Biosciences, Almirall, Alumis, Amgen, Arcutis, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aristea Therapeutics, Asana Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Connect Biopharma, Dermavant. Shareholder/stock ownership; Connect Biopharma and Mindera. Honoraria; Eli Lilly and Company, Evelo Biosciences, Immunic Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, Kangpu Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, Nimbus Therapeutics, Novartis. Grants/research support; Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Union Therapeutics, Ventyx Biosciences, and vTv Therapeutics. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R. Bolce is an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. J.R. Lisse: Shareholder/stock ownership; J. Lisse is an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. J. Pustizzi: Shareholder/stock ownership; J. Pustizzi is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. C. Sapin: Shareholder/stock ownership; C. Sapin is an employee and shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company. C. Ritchlin: Honoraria; AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma.

P170 Ixekizumab significantly improved quality of life and joint pain in patients with psoriatic arthritis, nail disease and distal interphalangeal joint involvement from SPIRIT-H2H

Abstract Background/Aims Among adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the SPIRIT H2H study, 65% had nail psoriasis (PsO) at baseline and of these, 96.2% had simultaneous distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) disease in ≥ 1 digits at baseline. This analysis describes the impact of ixekizumab (IXE) and adalimumab (ADA) on quality of life (QoL), function and joint pain. Methods This post-hoc analysis included patients from SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) treated with either IXE or ADA who had simultaneous nail and DIP involvement (swelling or tenderness) in ≥ 1 digits at baseline. Nail PsO was measured using Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Joint involvement was measured by tender/swollen joint count scores. Joint pain was measured by patient’s assessment of pain using Visual Analogue Scale (100 mm). QoL measures included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 Mental and Physical Component Summary Scores (SF-36 MCS/PCS). Patients were evaluated at baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52. Joint pain and SF-36 MCS/PCS changes from baseline were analysed using a mixed effects model of repeated measures. Proportions of patients achieving DLQI ≤1 or HAQ-DI change ≥0.35 (minimal clinically important difference) were analysed using logistic regressions. Non-responder imputation and modified baseline observation carried forward methods were used for missing data. Results 354 SPIRIT-H2H patients had a NAPSI total score &amp;gt;0 and DIP involvement in ≥ 1 digits simultaneously at baseline (IXE, N = 186 and ADA, N = 168). Among them, IXE-treated patients had a significant improvement in joint pain at Week 4 and a larger improvement in joint pain over 52 weeks vs ADA-treated patients. In addition, a larger proportion of IXE-treated patients achieved a DLQI score of 0 or 1, and these statistically significant differences were observed as early as Week 4 and sustained at each visit over 52 weeks. IXE-treated patients also experienced statistically significant improvements in SF-36 MCS at Week 4, 12 and 32 compared to ADA-treated patients; numerically greater improvements in favor of IXE were sustained at all other visits. IXE-treated patients showed a larger improvement in SF-36 PCS over 52 weeks vs ADA-treated patients, and these differences reached statistical significance at Week 24 and 32. Similar proportions of patients treated with IXE or ADA showed a clinically important improvement in HAQ-DI. Conclusion In patients with simultaneous nail and DIP involvement in ≥ 1 digit at baseline, IXE treatment resulted in significant improvements across multiple QoL measures, and greater improvements in joint pain compared to ADA treatment. These data may help health care providers make clinical decisions concerning the care of PsA in patients with nail and DIP involvement. Disclosure C. Ritchlin: Consultancies; C. Ritchlin has received consulting fees and/or honoraria and/or grant support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. A. Kavanaugh: Consultancies; A. Kavanaugh has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. L. Kristensen: Consultancies; L.E. Kristensen has received consulting fees and/or honoraria and/or research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen. J. Merola: Consultancies; J. F. Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Janssen, UCB Pharma, Sanofi-Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer. B. Strober: Corporate appointments; B. Strober has been serving as an Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis; and serving as scientific co-director and investigator for CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry. Consultancies; B. Strober has served as a speaker for and/or has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from: AbbVie, Alamar, Alumis, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Arena, Aristea, Asana, Boehringer Ingelheim. Shareholder/stock ownership; reports having stock options in Connect Biopharma, Mindera Health. Honoraria; He is also a consultant for Immunic Therapeutics, Kangpu Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Connect Biopharma, Dermavant, Evelo Biosciences, Incyte, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly and Company, Maruho. Grants/research support; He is also a consultant for Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera Health, Protagonist, Nimbus, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Sun Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, Union Therapeutics, Ventyxbio, vTv Therapeutic. J. Lisse: Consultancies; J. Lisse is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R. Bolce is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. C. Sapin: Shareholder/stock ownership; C. Sapin is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. J. Pustizzi: Shareholder/stock ownership; J. Pustizzi is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. D. McGonagle: Consultancies; D. McGonagle has received consulting fees and/or honoraria and/or research grants from: AbbVie and Eli Lilly and Company. Grants/research support; His funding sources include or have included the Wellcome Trust-EPSRC, UK NIHR, ARUK, MRC UK and EU FP7 programme.

Effectiveness of biologic treatment for psoriasis in Malaysia: Real-world evidence and review of current evidence from Southeast Asia

Abstract Background: Biological treatments are effective in the management of psoriasis. However, results in the real-world setting may differ from clinical trials. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of biological drugs among patients with psoriasis in Malaysia. Methods: This was a retrospective review of adult patients on biologics who were notified to the Malaysian Psoriasis Registry between 2011 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with response to treatment in terms of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, PASI 90, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1. Results: Of 130 patients, the most prescribed drug was ustekinumab (40.8%), followed by adalimumab (29.2%) and secukinumab (24.6%). Overall, the differences in the median PASI scores from baseline were −23.9 at 3–6 months, −25.8 at 12 months, and −27.8 at 3 years, while the difference in the median DLQI scores was −13.0 at 3–6 months. At 3–6 months, 57.6% achieved PASI-75, 32.9% achieved PASI-90, and 4.7% achieved PASI-100. These responses were sustained at 12 months and 3 years. Adalimumab was the most effective treatment with 88.9% achieving PASI-75, 77.8% PASI-90, and 22.2% PASI-100 at 3 years. However, secukinumab was more effective at achieving a PASI-100 response at 3–6 months (9.1%). Chinese or Indian ethnicity, concurrent use of systemic therapy or phototherapy, comorbidities, and a longer duration of psoriasis were associated with poorer response. Conclusion: Biological treatments, particularly adalimumab and secukinumab, are effective in reducing disease severity and improving the quality of life of patients with psoriasis in Malaysia.

Psoriasis and its impact on close relatives and partners of patients – A cross‐sectional questionnaire study

AbstractBackgroundLittle is known about the exact impact of psoriasis on the disease burden of close relatives and partners of those affected by the disease.ObjectivesThe aim of this single‐centre cross‐sectional study was to evaluate the quality of life in psoriasis patients and the impact of disease on partners and close relatives.Methods250 plaque‐type psoriasis patients (58.4% males and 41.6% females) with mostly treatment‐controlled disease (mean PASI of 1.7 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 4.1) were recruited from the Psoriasis Registry Austria (PsoRA) and their close relatives and partners were invited to participate in the study. Patient Family Impact Score (PFIS) was calculated from the FamilyPso questionnaire data to establish categories of disease burden in close relatives and partners.ResultsValid FamilyPso questionnaires were returned from 153 (61.2%) close relatives and partners. Correlation analysis revealed a significant association between PASI and DLQI (r = 0.512, p &lt; 0.001), PASI and PFIS (r = 0.228, p = 0.006), and DLQI and PFIS (r = 0.210, p = 0.014). An at least small or larger impairment of life quality (DLQI ≥ 2) was observed in 46.7% of psoriasis patients, despite treatment. A small or larger disease burden was detected in nearly 78.7% of the male and 77.3% of the female relatives and partners quantified with categorized PFIS.ConclusionsThe study revealed a significant impact of patients' psoriasis on the disease burden of close relatives and partners, depending on the severity of PASI and extent of quality of life disruption in patients. The gender of the relatives and partners had no impact on the PFIS.

Impact of disease, musculoskeletal symptoms and disease control in the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

Early identification, diagnosis and symptom control of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis remain unmet medical needs. To compare the impact of disease and other characteristics between patients with psoriasis who screened positive for PsA using the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) (screen-positive group) and patients who (i) have PsA (PsA group) or (ii) screened negative for PsA (screen-negative group). Also, to determine the proportion of patients at a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in the screen-positive and PsA groups. This was a cross-sectional analysis of the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry. We included a convenience sample of patients with psoriasis from the screen-positive and PsA groups who completed the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID12), and a comparator screen-negative group who did not complete the PsAID12. We report descriptive summaries of demographics, comorbidities, psoriasis characteristics, patient-reported outcome measures and the proportion of patients at PASS (i.e. PsAID12 ≤ 4). The screen-positive, PsA and screen-negative groups included 369,70 and 4724 patients, respectively. The screen-positive and PsA groups had a similar impact of disease, demographics, comorbidities and psoriasis characteristics (d < 0.337). Mean PsAID12 scores were 3.1 (SD 2.3) and 3.7 (SD 2.6) in the screen-positive and PsA groups, respectively. Compared with patients who screened negative for PsA, patients who screened positive exhibited higher rates of selected known predictors of PsA such as older age, longer psoriasis duration, nail disease and inverse psoriasis. The proportion of patients at PASS was 56% and 67% for the PsA and screen-positive groups, respectively. The similar profiles between screen-positive and PsA groups, in comparison with the screen-negative group, support observations of possible underdiagnosis of PsA and the increased impact of disease, especially musculoskeletal disease, among patients who screen positive for PsA. The high percentage of patients not at an acceptable symptom state in the PsA and screen-positive groups highlights the need to optimize care in PsA.

Clinical profile, treatment and quality of life of patients with psoriatic arthritis in Malaysia: A population-based cross-sectional study.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a major comorbidity of psoriasis and may lead to irreversible joint damage and disability. This study aims to describe the clinical profile, treatment and quality of life (QoL) of patients with PsA in Malaysia. This is a multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study of psoriasis patients who were notified to the Malaysian Psoriasis Registry (MPR) from January 2007 to December 2018. Of 21 735 psoriasis patients, 2756 (12.7%) had PsA. The male to female ratio was 1:1. The mean age of psoriasis onset for PsA patients was 34.73 ± 14.44 years. They had a higher rate of family history of psoriasis (26% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.001), scalp (82.7% vs. 81.0%, p = 0.04) and nail involvement (73.3% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.001), obesity (62.6% vs. 54.4%, p < 0.001), dyslipidaemia (23.8% vs. 15.4%, p < 0.001), hypertension (31.1% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (20.9% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001) compared to non-PsA patients. More than half (54.3%) had severe psoriasis [(body surface area >10% and/or Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) >10)]. Most had oligo-/monoarthropathy (40.3%), followed by distal interphalangeal arthropathy (31.3%), symmetrical polyarthropathy (28.3%), spondylitis/sacroiliitis (8.2%) and arthritis mutilans (3.2%). Nearly 40% of PsA patients received systemic treatment, but only 1.6% received biologic agents. QoL was more significantly affected in PsA than in non-PsA patients (mean DLQI 10.12 ± 7.16 vs. 9.52 ± 6.67, p < 0.001). One in eight patients with psoriasis in Malaysia had PsA. They had a higher incidence of comorbidities, severe disease, impaired QoL and were more likely to receive systemic and biological treatment compared to non PsA patients.

[Translated article] Drug Survival in Cyclosporine Treatment for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP)

BackgroundThe past 5 years have seen a proliferation of new treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD). We analyzed recent drug survival data for cyclosporine in this setting. Because the Spanish National Healthcare system requires patients with AD to be treated with cyclosporine before they can be prescribed other systemic treatments, drug survival for cyclosporine may be shorter than in other diseases. Material and methodMulticenter, observational, prospective cohort study using data from the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP). Data from the Spanish Registry of Systemic Treatments in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM) were used to create a comparison cohort. ResultsWe analyzed data for 130 patients with AD treated with cyclosporine (median drug survival, 1 year). Median cyclosporine survival in the psoriasis comparison group (150 patients) was 0.37 years. Drug survival was significantly longer in AD than in psoriasis (P<.001). ConclusionDrug survival of cyclosporine in the BIOBADATOP registry is similar to that described in other series of patients with AD and longer than that observed in the BIOBADADERM psoriasis registry.

Enhanced impact of psoriasis severity on the treatment demands of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study based on a national psoriasis registry in China

ObjectivesThe personalised treatment demands of patients with psoriasis did not get significant attention during the pandemic lockdown. This study aimed to investigate the treatment demands of patients with psoriasis with...