PSMA PET-CT Research Articles

Phase 2 trial of PSMA PET CT versus planar bone scan and CT in prostate cancer patients progressing while on androgen deprivation therapy

For prostate cancer patients who experience biochemical progression during androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has not been prospectively compared to planar bone scan plus CT. This was a single-arm, head-to-head, prospective phase II trial (NCT04928820) designed to enroll 102 men with prostate cancer who experienced biochemical progression (rising prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 1 ng/mL) during ADT. All patients received 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP planar bone scans. Each scan was interpreted by three central independent readers. The primary endpoint was the per-patient bone metastasis detection rate of PSMA PET/CT versus planar bone scan and CT. Secondary endpoints compared the number of bone metastases detected per patient and the inter-reader agreement of each imaging modality. Twenty-two men were enrolled between July 2021 and June 2022. Due to slow accrual following approval of PSMA PET radiotracers in the U.S. and a lack of a statistical signal between the two imaging modalities on interim analysis, this trial was closed early on October 2022. Median PSA was 8.5 ng/mL (interquartile range: 1.6–77.6). There was 100% agreement between the two scans. Six patients (27%) had negative findings and 16 patients (73%) had positive findings on both scans. PSMA PET/CT and bone scan plus CT detected an equal number of bone lesions for 14 patients (64%), PSMA PET/CT detected more bone lesions for six patients (27%), and bone scan plus CT detected more bone lesions for two patients (9.1%) (p = 0.092). The inter-reader agreement rates of PSMA PET/CT and bone scan plus CT were 96% and 82%, respectively (p = 0.25). In men with biochemical progression during ADT, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP planar bone scan plus CT had identical bone metastasis detection rates. Bone scan plus CT can continue to serve as a cost-effective and readily accessible restaging modality in patients with biochemical progression. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04928820. Registered 16/06/2021.

Intra-prostatic recurrences after radiotherapy with focal boost: Location and dose mapping in the FLAME trial

IntroductionThe FLAME trial demonstrated that the dose to the gross tumor volume (GTV) is associated with tumour control in prostate cancer patients. This raises the question if dose de-escalation to the remaining prostate gland can be considered. Therefore, we investigated if intraprostatic recurrences occur at the location of the GTV and which dose was delivered at that location. Materials and methodsFor FLAME trial patients with an intra-prostatic recurrence, we collected pre-treatment images, GTV delineations, dose distributions and post-recurrence images. Pre-treatment images were registered to the post-recurrence images (PSMA-PET CT). An overlap between GTV and PSMA-PET activity was considered an intra-prostatic recurrence at the location of the primary tumor. ResultsTwenty eight out of 535 patients in the FLAME trial had an intra-prostatic recurrence. Its location could be determined for 24 patients. One patient recurred in the prostate gland outside the GTV. The median D98% to the GTV was 76.5 Gy (range: 73.3–86.5 Gy). Only one patient with a recurrence in the GTV received a substantial focal boost of 86.5 Gy. The D98% of all remaining patients was < 81 Gy. ConclusionIntra-prostatic recurrences of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy appeared predominantly at the location of the primary tumor. All but one patient did not receive a high dose to the GTV. Intra-prostatic failure is likely a consequence of the undertreatment of the primary tumor rather than the undertreatment of the remaining prostate gland.

3326: Diagnostic imaging in prostate cancer - MRI, PSMA PET-CT - Who needs what?

3326: Diagnostic imaging in prostate cancer - MRI, PSMA PET-CT - Who needs what?

2502: Can we predict extraprostatic/metastatic disease on PSMA PET-CT based on PSA, MRI and Gleason grade?

2502: Can we predict extraprostatic/metastatic disease on PSMA PET-CT based on PSA, MRI and Gleason grade?

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for High-Risk and Very High-Risk Locoregional Prostate Cancer in the Modern Era: Real-World Experience from an Asian Cohort.

This study retrospectively evaluates the clinical outcomes of definitive volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for high-risk or very high-risk locoregional prostate cancer patients from an Asian institution. Consecutive patients who received VMAT (76 Gy in 38 fractions) between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) (46 Gy in 23 fractions) was employed for clinically node-negative disease (cN0) and a Roach estimated risk of ≥15%, as well as simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 55-57.5 Gy to node-positive (cN1) disease. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS). Secondary endpoints included radiographic relapse-free survival (RRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS). A total of 209 patients were identified. After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the 4-year actuarial BRFS, RRFS, MFS and PCSS were 85.2%, 96.8%, 96.8% and 100%, respectively. The incidence of late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were 15.8% and 11.0%, respectively. No significant difference in cancer outcomes or toxicity was observed between WPRT and prostate-only radiotherapy for cN0 patients. SIB to the involved nodes did not result in increased toxicity. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) group 5 and cN1 stage were associated with worse RRFS (p < 0.05). PSMA PET-CT compared to conventional imaging staging was associated with better BRFS in patients with ISUP grade group 5 (p = 0.039). Five-year local experience demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes. PSMA PET-CT staging for high-grade disease and tailored pelvic irradiation based on nodal risk should be considered to maximize clinical benefit.

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in the initial staging of prostate cancer.

Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA PET/CT) is notable for its superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting recurrent PCa and is under investigation for its potential in pre-treatment staging. Despite its established efficacy in nodal and metastasis staging in trial setting, its role in primary staging awaits fuller validation due to limited evidence on oncologic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT compared to CI for comprehensive PCa staging. Medline, Scopus and Web of science databases were searched till March 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. Primary outcomes were specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA PET/CT for local, nodal and metastatic staging in PCa patients. Due to the unavailability of data, a meta-analysis was feasible only for detection of seminal vesicles invasion (SVI) and LNI. A total of 49 studies, comprising 3876 patients, were included. Of these, 6 investigated accuracy of PSMA PET/CT in detection of SVI. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 42.29% (95%CI: 29.85-55.78%), 87.59% (95%CI: 77.10%-93.67%), 93.39% (95%CI: 74.95%-98.52%) and 86.60% (95%CI: 58.83%-96.69%), respectively. Heterogeneity analysis revealed significant variability for PPV and NPV. 18 studies investigated PSMA PET/CT accuracy in detection of LNI. Aggregate sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 43.63% (95%CI: 34.19-53.56%), 85.55% (95%CI: 75.95%-91.74%), 67.47% (95%CI: 52.42%-79.6%) and 83.61% (95%CI: 79.19%-87.24%). No significant heterogeneity was found between studies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis highlights PSMA PET-CT effectiveness in detecting SVI and its good accuracy in LNI compared to CI. Nonetheless, it also reveals a lack of high-quality research on its performance in clinical T staging, extraprostatic extension and distant metastasis evaluation, emphasizing the need for further rigorous studies.

Predictors of Metastasis in 68GA-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Pet-CT in the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer.

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate factors influencing Gallium 68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (Ga68 PSMA PET-CT) uptake for primary staging in prostate cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 499 non-metastatic and 243 de novo metastatic prostate cancer cases undergoing Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were collected and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression determined independent risk factors for metastasis detection on Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Results: Metastatic cases showed higher levels of total PSA, PSA density (dPSA) and biopsy ISUP grade group compared to non-metastatic cases. Multivariate analysis identified cT2 stage and dPSA as independent predictors of metastasis detection on Ga68 PSMA PET-CT. Conclusions: Ga68 PSMA PET-CT plays a crucial role in prostate cancer staging, with identified factors such as clinical T stage and dPSA significantly impacting its diagnostic accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of Ga68 PSMA PET-CT in refining clinical staging and guiding treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.

Deep learning-based whole-body PSMA PET/CT attenuation correction utilizing Pix-2-Pix GAN.

Sequential PET/CT studies oncology patients can undergo during their treatment follow-up course is limited by radiation dosage. We propose an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to produce attenuation-corrected PET (AC-PET) images from non-attenuation-corrected PET (NAC-PET) images to reduce need for low-dose CT scans. A deep learning algorithm based on 2D Pix-2-Pix generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture was developed from paired AC-PET and NAC-PET images. 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET-CT studies from 302 prostate cancer patients, split into training, validation, and testing cohorts (n = 183, 60, 59, respectively). Models were trained with two normalization strategies: Standard Uptake Value (SUV)-based and SUV-Nyul-based. Scan-level performance was evaluated by normalized mean square error (NMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Lesion-level analysis was performed in regions-of-interest prospectively from nuclear medicine physicians. SUV metrics were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), repeatability coefficient (RC), and linear mixed-effects modeling. Median NMSE, MAE, SSIM, and PSNR were 13.26%, 3.59%, 0.891, and 26.82, respectively, in the independent test cohort. ICC for SUVmax and SUVmean were 0.88 and 0.89, which indicated a high correlation between original and AI-generated quantitative imaging markers. Lesion location, density (Hounsfield units), and lesion uptake were all shown to impact relative error in generated SUV metrics (all p < 0.05). The Pix-2-Pix GAN model for generating AC-PET demonstrates SUV metrics that highly correlate with original images. AI-generated PET images show clinical potential for reducing the need for CT scans for attenuation correction while preserving quantitative markers and image quality.

2520: PSA threshold and predictors of metastases on PSMA PET CT for PSA progression post radiation.

2520: PSA threshold and predictors of metastases on PSMA PET CT for PSA progression post radiation.

Real-World Evidence of Triplet Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Austrian Multicenter Study

IntroductionTwo randomized trials demonstrated a survival benefit of triplet therapy (androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) plus androgen receptor pathway inhibitor [ARPI] plus docetaxel) over doublet therapy (ADT plus docetaxel), thus changing treatment strategies in metastatic hormonesensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Patients and MethodsWe conducted the first real-world analysis comprising 97 mHSPC patients from 16 Austrian medical centers, among them 79.4% of patients received abiraterone and 17.5% darolutamide treatment. Baseline characteristics and clinical parameters during triplet therapy were documented. Mann-Whitney U test for continuous or X²-test for categorical variables was used. Variables on progression were tested using logistic regression analysis and tabulated as hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI). ResultsOf 83.5% patients with synchronous and 16.5% with metachronous disease were included. 83.5% had high-volume disease diagnosed by conventional imaging (48.9%) or PSMA PET-CT (51.1%). While docetaxel and ARPI were administered consistent with pivotal trials, prednisolone, prophylactic gCSF and osteoprotective agents were not applied guideline conform in 32.5%, 37%, and 24.3% of patients, respectively. Importantly, a nonsimultaneous onset of chemotherapy and ARPI, performed in 44.3% of patients, was associated with significantly worse treatment response (P = .015, HR 0.245). Starting ARPI before chemotherapy was associated with significantly higher probability for progression (P = .023, HR 15.781) than vice versa. Strikingly, 15.6% (abiraterone) and 25.5% (darolutamide) low-volume patients as well as 14.4% (abiraterone) and 17.6% (darolutamide) metachronous patients received triplet therapy. Adverse events (AE) occurred in 61.9% with grade 3 to 5 in 15% of patient without age-related differences. All patients achieved a PSA decline of 99% and imaging response was confirmed in 88% of abiraterone and 75% of darolutamide patients. ConclusionsTriplet therapy arrived in clinical practice primarily for synchronous high-volume mHSPC. Regardless of selected therapy regimen, treatment is highly effective and tolerable. Preferably therapy should be administered simultaneously, however if not possible, chemotherapy should be started first.

Rational use of Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT according to nomograms and risk groups for the detection of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer

ObjectivesThe aim was to ensure efficient utilization of PSMA PET-CT by examining the correlation of pathological lymph node metastasis with nomogram scores and risk classifications. Methods and materialsRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections for pelvic lymph nodes were performed using the same template. Bilaterally pelvic lymph nodes were removed within the boundaries of genitofemoral nerves, psoas muscle and lateral pelvic wall laterally, ureteric crossing of the iliac vessels superiorly, lateral bladder wall medially, Cooper ligaments distally, and endopelvic fascia, neurovascular bundles and internal iliac arteries posteriorly. Clinical nomograms were used to calculate the probability of lymph node metastasis preoperatively. Using receiver operating characteristics analysis, discriminatory cut-offs were calculated. The diagnostic performance of PSMA PET-CT was determined for detecting lymph node metastasis. ResultsFor 81 patients, the median age was 64 years. The median PSA was 6.8 ng/ml. Most patients were in the D'Amico intermediate (56.8%) and high (37%) risk groups. Median Briganti 2017, MSKCC, and Partin scores were 35 (4–99), 37 (8–90), and 12 (2–38), respectively, in pN1 patients. The area under the curve for Briganti 2017, MSKCC, Partin nomograms and PSMA PET-CT scans were 0.852, 0.871, 0.862, and 0.588. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT for lymph node metastasis detection were 21.4%, 94%, 42.9%, and 85.1%, respectively, for the whole group. By using higher threshold values for clinical nomograms (Briganti 2017 >32, MSKCC >12, Partin >5), PSMA PET-CT had higher sensitivity (42.9, 30, 27.2) in detecting lymph node metastasis. ConclusionsPatients in the D'Amico high-risk group and those with high nomogram scores are the best candidates who will benefit from preoperative PSMA PET-CT staging to estimate lymph node metastasis.

Comparison of Multiparametric MRI, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT, and Clinical Nomograms for Primary T and N Staging of Intermediate-to-High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is commonly used for the primary staging of prostate cancer, it may miss non-enlarged metastatic lymph nodes. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA PET-CT) is a promising method to detect non-enlarged metastatic lymph nodes, but more data are needed. In this single-center, prospective study, we enrolled patients with intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy with pelvic node dissection. Before surgery, prostate imaging with mpMRI and PSMA PET-CT was used to assess lymph node involvement (LNI), extra-prostatic extension (EPE), and seminal vesicle involvement (SVI). Additionally, we used clinical nomograms to estimate the risk of these three outcomes. Of the 74 patients included, 61 (82%) had high-risk prostate cancer, and the rest had intermediate-risk cancer. Histopathology revealed LNI in 20 (27%) patients, SVI in 26 (35%), and EPE in 52 (70%). PSMA PET-CT performed better than mpMRI at detecting LNI (area under the curve (AUC, 95% confidence interval): 0.779 (0.665-0.893) vs. 0.655 (0.529-0.780)), but mpMRI was better at detecting SVI (AUC: 0.775 (0.672-0.878) vs. 0.585 (0.473-0.698)). The MSKCC nomogram performed well at detecting both LNI (AUC: 0.799 (0.680-0.918)) and SVI (0.772 (0.659-0.885)). However, when the nomogram was used to derive binary diagnoses, decision curve analyses showed that the MSKCC nomogram provided less net benefit than mpMRI and PSMA PET-CT for detecting SVI and LNI, respectively. mpMRI and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT are complementary techniques to be used in conjunction for the primary T and N staging of prostate cancer.

Accuracy of combined multi-parametric MRI and PSMA PET-CT in diagnosing localized prostate cancer: newer horizons for a biopsy-free pathway

IntroductionProstate-specific antigen (PSA) is a reliable biomarker for identification of prostate cancer, although a biopsy is still the gold standard for detecting prostate cancer. Similar to higher PIRADS lesions on MRI, the maximal standard uptake value (SUV max) on PSMA PET is linked to a higher likelihood of prostate cancer. Can an mpMRI in conjunction with PSMA PET Scan accurately predict prostate cancer and further trigger omission of biopsy similar to other solid organ urological malignancies?MethodsGa-68 PSMA PET and mpMRI were performed for each patient who was a part of this retrospective study. The PET-positive lesion's maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was recorded. Prostate biopsies were performed on patients who had PSMA PET avid lesions and a PIRADS score of 4 or 5. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was afterward performed on patients who had cancer on their prostate biopsy. The prostatectomy specimen's histopathological information was recorded. Cutoff values and correlations between the variables were determined using the ROC curves and Pearson's correlation test.ResultOn the basis of suspicious DRE findings or elevated PSA, 70 men underwent mpMRI and PET scans. PIRADS 4 patients had a median (IQR) SUVmax of 8.75 (11.95); whereas, PIRADS 5 patients had an SUVmax of 24.5 (22). The mean SUVmax for patients whose biopsies revealed no cancer was 6.25 ± 1.41. With an AUC of 0.876 on the ROC curve, it was found that there was a significant positive correlation between the results of the mpMRI and PET scans and those of the histopathological investigation. A SUVmax ≥ 8.25 on PSMA PET for a PIRADS 4/5 lesion on mpMRI will aid in correctly predicting malignancy, with a sensitivity of 82.8% and specificity of 100%.ConclusionThe findings of this study were positive and indicated that patients with a high suspicion of prostate cancer on mpMRI and PSMA PET (PIRADS ≥ 4 and SUVmax ≥ 8.25). This study substantiates the fact that a combination of mpMRI and PSMA PET can accurately predict localized prostate cancer.

Intraoperative Frozen Section via Neurosafe During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in the Era of Preoperative Risk Stratifications and Primary Staging With mpMRI and PSMA-PET CT: Is There a Perfect Candidate?

We aimed to analyze the effect of preoperative risk assessment including Ga-68 PSMA PET and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) on nerve sparing practices, positive surgical margin (PSM) rates and oncological outcomes based on a comparison between patients underwent RARP with and without Neurosafe (NS). Patients underwent RARP with NS (RARP-NS) or without (RARP-only) NS retrospectively evaluated. Suspicion for extracapsular extension on mpMRI and/or Ga-68 PSMA PET was recorded as i(imaging)T3. NS was performed according to the Martini-Klinik technique. PSM at preserved bundle side were called PSM at region of interest (ROI) while the others were elsewhere. A total of 208 patients (90 in RARP-NS, 118 in RARP-only groups) were included. Preoperatively the RARP-only group showed significantly higher mean PSA (p=.01) and PIRADS 5 (p=.002) findings and had more D'Amico high risk (DAHR) patients (p=.08). The overall PSM rates for pT2 versus pT3 disease were 7.5% versus 21.6 and 15.6% versus 55% in RARP-NS and RARP-only groups, respectively. NS resulted in more bilaterally preserved bundles (81.1% vs. 66.3%) and less PSM at the ROI (3.3% vs. 23.4%) than RARP-only group. NS outperformed RARP-only in all clinical settings had its highest differential benefit in more bilateral nerve sparing and less PSM at ROI in patients with both DAHR and iT3 disease. BCR rates were 2.2% and 2.5% for RARP-NS and RARP only groups, respectively (p=.4). One patient in RARP-NS and 9 in RARP-only groups had PSA persistence (p=.02). RARP-NS led to more preserved bundles with less PSM. It was especially useful in DAHR patients with preoperative extracapsular extension suspicion in imaging simultaneously.

Automatic Prediction of Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) Using Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET for Oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (omCSPC)

Recent data have shown the promise of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to improve outcomes in omCSPC patients. Response biomarkers are still needed to identify patients at an early time point who will not respond to the treatment. We have shown that PSMA PET-CT SUVmax changes over time may be a useful response biomarker that correlates with MFS, an important endpoint in these omCSPC patients. This study investigated radiomic imaging biomarkers derived from PSMA-PET acquired pre- and post-MDT for MFS prediction, which may provide better features to discriminate response in the future to improve the outcome of these patients. We accrued an international multi-institutional cohort of omCSPC patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) MDT. The cohort includes 32 patients from Institution 1 (USA) and 38 patients from Institution 2 (Europe). Both pre- and 6-month post-treatment PSMA-PET/CT were acquired. Combat was used for data harmonization in the image domain to minimize imaging variations across institutions. We defined the GTV volume as zone 1 and a 3-5 mm expansion ring area outside the GTV as zone 2 for radiomics analysis. 874 radiomics features (214 original and 660 wavelet filtered features) were extracted from both zones using open-source software and used together for MFS prediction. Function Chi2 was used to select the most significant five features. Several machine learning models (Random Forest, Logistic regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayesian) were implemented to predict MFS. The models were tested using both a leave-one-out strategy and cross-validation across the two institutions. In the leave-one-out biomarker using 70 patients, random forest achieved the best accuracy, with MFS predicted correctly for 56 (80% of 70) patients. The five radiomic features identified based on their ability to predict MFS included Entropy, Skewness, and Compactness from zone 1, Skewness, and Mesh volume from zone 2. In the cross-institution tests, random forest predicted MFS correctly for 24 (75% of 32) patients when being trained using 38 Institution 2 patients and validated against 32 Institution 1 patients. Vice versa, the model predicted MFS correctly for 28 (74% of 38) patients when being trained using Institution 1 patients and validation using Institution 2 patients. The five features identified for prediction included Entropy and Skewness from both zones and Flatness from zone 1. Our study demonstrated the promise of using pre- and post-MDT PSMA-PET-based imaging radiomic biomarkers for MFS prediction for omCSPC patients. Imaging biomarkers predictive of MFS were identified in both GTV and the ring area outside GTV. Over 74% prediction accuracy was achieved in the cross-institution validation test. The model provides a valuable tool for prognosis prediction early following MDT, which opens up a unique opportunity for monitoring or treatment interventions for patients identified with poor prognoses to improve outcomes.

Poster 17 - The impact of Ga-68 PSMA PET CT scanning on change of treatment modalities for the management of recurrent prostate cancer, in an Irish cohort

Poster 17 - The impact of Ga-68 PSMA PET CT scanning on change of treatment modalities for the management of recurrent prostate cancer, in an Irish cohort

A Systematic Review of New Imaging Technologies for Robotic Prostatectomy: From Molecular Imaging to Augmented Reality.

New imaging technologies play a pivotal role in the current management of patients with prostate cancer. Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a standard of care for localized disease and through the already imaging-based console subject of research towards combinations of imaging technologies and RARP as well as their impact on surgical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the currently available literature for new imaging technologies for RARP. On 24 January 2023, we performed a systematic review of the current literature on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science according to the PRISMA guidelines and Oxford levels of evidence. A total of 46 studies were identified of which 19 studies focus on imaging of the primary tumor, 12 studies on the intraoperative tumor detection of lymph nodes and 15 studies on the training of surgeons. While the feasibility of combined approaches using new imaging technologies including MRI, PSMA-PET CT or intraoperatively applied radioactive and fluorescent dyes has been demonstrated, the prospective confirmation of improvements in surgical outcomes is currently ongoing.

Lessons from a 3-Year Review of PSMA PET-CT in a Tertiary Setting: Can We Fine Tune Referral Criteria by Identifying Factors Predicting Positivity and Negativity?

To draw inferences from a retrospective evaluation of PSMA PET CT scans performed for the evaluation of biochemical recurrence. A retrospective analysis of 295 PSMA PET CT scans spanning 3 years between 2020 and 2022 was undertaken. Of 295 PET CT scans, 179 were positive, 66 were negative and 50 had indeterminate findings. In the positive group, 67 had radical prostatectomy and PSMA avid lesions were seen most commonly in pelvic lymph nodes. The remaining 112 positive scans were in the non-radical prostatectomy group; 25 had recurrence only in the prostate, 17 had recurrence involving the prostate bed; 28 had no recurrence in the prostate gland, while 42 had recurrence in the prostate as well as in extra-prostatic sites. Overall, in the non-prostatectomy group, 75% of the population was harboring a PSMA avid lesion in the prostate gland while in the remaining 25% of the population, recurrence did not involve the prostate gland. The majority of indeterminate findings were seen in small pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodes or skeletal regions (ribs/others) and in nine patients indeterminate focus was seen in the prostate bed only. Follow-up PSMA PET CT was helpful in prior indeterminate findings and unexplained PSA rise. A higher recurrence in the prostate bed while evaluating biochemical recurrence prompts the following: question: should prostatectomy be offered more proactively? Follow-up PSMA PET CT is helpful for indeterminate findings; a PSA rise of 0.7 ng/mL in 6 months can result in positive PSMA PET CT while negative scans can be seen up to a 2 ng/mL PSA rise in 6 months.

A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the Incidence of Bone-Only Disease at PSMA PET/CT in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.

PSMA PET/CT has unprecedented accuracy for localization of initial or recurrent prostate cancer (PC), which can be applied in a metastasis-directed therapy approach. PSMA PET/CT (PET) also has a role in the selection of patients for metastasis-directed therapy or radioligand therapy and therapy assessment in CRPC patients. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to determine the incidence of bone-only metastasis in CRPC patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT for restaging, as well as identifying potential predictors of bone-only PET positivity. The study analyzed data from 179 patients from two centers in Essen and Bologna. Results showed that 20.1% of the patients had PSMA uptake only in the bone, with the most frequent lesions located in the vertebrae, ribs, and hip bone. Half half of the patients showed oligo disease in bone and may benefit from a bone-metastasis-directed therapy. Initial positive nodal status and solitary ADT were shown to be negative predictors of osseous metastasis. The role of PSMA PET/TC in this patient population needs to be further explored in terms of its role in the evaluation and adoption of bone-specific therapies.

PD27-04 AURORA A 3D MODEL GUIDED NERVE SPARING TECHNIQUE IN ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD27-04 AURORA A 3D MODEL GUIDED NERVE SPARING TECHNIQUE IN ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY Christian Engesser, Brantner Philip, Julian Gehweiler, Matthias Walter, Christian Wetterauer, Helge Seifert, Svetozar Subotic, Cyrill Rentsch, Lukas Bubendorf, Tatjana Vlajnic, Abolfazl Hosseini, and Jan Ebbing Christian EngesserChristian Engesser More articles by this author , Brantner PhilipBrantner Philip More articles by this author , Julian GehweilerJulian Gehweiler More articles by this author , Matthias WalterMatthias Walter More articles by this author , Christian WetterauerChristian Wetterauer More articles by this author , Helge SeifertHelge Seifert More articles by this author , Svetozar SuboticSvetozar Subotic More articles by this author , Cyrill RentschCyrill Rentsch More articles by this author , Lukas BubendorfLukas Bubendorf More articles by this author , Tatjana VlajnicTatjana Vlajnic More articles by this author , Abolfazl HosseiniAbolfazl Hosseini More articles by this author , and Jan EbbingJan Ebbing More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003305.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Nerve-sparing (NS) procedures in radical prostatectomy have gained importance as they show better functional outcomes in terms of erectile function. It is recommended that the neurovascular bundle (NVB) should be removed if residual tumor is suspected. Alternatively, intraoperative fresh frozen section (FFS) may help in this decision. However, standard FFS techniques do not provide a direct visual impression of the positive surgical margin (PSM) for guidance regarding secondary resection (SR) at the GNB. We therefore intend to optimize precision for SR using a personalized 3D printed prostate model in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: We prospectively included 100 patients in which NS-RARP was performed between September 2018 and August 2021 at the University Hospital Basel and Cantonal Hospital Basel-Land. Image data of the preoperative pelvic MRI scan were used to render and print a personalized 3D prostate model. PIRADS lesions (>grade 3) and potential capsular involvement were color-characterized in the model. The model was used during surgery to allow the pathologist to mark a positive surgical margin (PSM) on the model and to help guide the surgeon for selective SR (SSR). Functional outcome was assessed using IIEF-5 prior and one year after surgery. RESULTS: 17.0% (17/100) of all patients had PSM in final histology with a rate of 15.4% in pT2 and 25% in pT3 tumors, respectively. PSM was identified during FFS in 23.0% (23/100) of patients, and SSR achieved a tumor-free surgical margin on final histology in 19 of these 23 patients (82.6%), with SSR containing tumor tissue in 9 of 23 patients (39.1%). Intraoperative PSM was associated with a PIRADS lesion in 11 patients (48%). PSA was undetectable 6 weeks postoperatively in 18/19 (94.7%) patients with successful SSR but only in 76.5 % of patients with PSM in final pathology. False negative rate of FFS was 16.9% (13/77). Despite 6/8 (75%) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) having a PSM successfully converted, only 1 had imageproven local recurrence in PSMA PET CT. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed prostate models are a promising approach to precision SSR and improve communication between surgeons and pathologists. Successful conversion rates (82.6%) were similar to procedures using NEUROSafe (86%). The sensitivity of MRI, the false-negative rate of conventional FFS and cost effectiveness remain critical limitations. Source of Funding: Intuitive Surgical © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e742 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Christian Engesser More articles by this author Brantner Philip More articles by this author Julian Gehweiler More articles by this author Matthias Walter More articles by this author Christian Wetterauer More articles by this author Helge Seifert More articles by this author Svetozar Subotic More articles by this author Cyrill Rentsch More articles by this author Lukas Bubendorf More articles by this author Tatjana Vlajnic More articles by this author Abolfazl Hosseini More articles by this author Jan Ebbing More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...