Pseudotachylyte (Pt) veins associated with ancient fault zones are considered as reliable palaeoseismic indicators as they are produced by a combination of cataclasis and frictional melting of the host rock during rapid (seismic rate) fault slip. In spite of a large amount of work done on pseudotachylytes, several issues related to the frictional melting process are not completely resolved for example, the nature and origin of domain‐scale chemical heterogeneity of the Pt matrix, the contribution of different minerals of the host rocks in forming the melt product, temperature variation in different domains of the Pt veins, among others. To revisit these issues, pseudotachylyte veins hosted entirely within pelitic gneisses (Pt‐I) and those formed along the contact of gneisses with intrusive meta‐dolerite dykes (Pt‐II) within the Sarwar‐Junia Fault Zone in Rajasthan, India, are studied in detail using optical and scanning electron microscope, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), X‐ray fluorescence, and electron probe micro‐analyser, with an intention to better understand the evolution of the microstructures and the heterogeneous chemical character of the pseudotachylyte veins and their host rocks. Unequivocal melt‐origin microstructures (e.g., microlites, spherulites, melt flow structure) are observed in the pseudotachylyte matrix, and an indirect evidence of amorphous (glass?) phase is found through XRD. The Pt‐matrix is more mafic than the host rock or the bulk Pt‐vein, irrespective of the rock types involved, indicating preferential melting of mafic minerals of the host rock(s). Microdomain‐scale variation in mineralogical and chemical character of Pt‐matrix suggests co‐existence of melts of different composition which remained unmixed due to rapid quenching of the melt. Mineral chemistry of fine microlites and spherulites within the Pt‐matrix differs significantly from the corresponding parent mineral grains in the respective host rocks suggesting their formation by direct crystallization from a melt phase. Formation of microlites by devitrification of solidified glass is discounted due to the absence of fluid activity, and due to the spatial distribution of finer microlites (near the Pt‐vein boundary), and coarser spherulites (near the centre). It is surmised that frictional heating attains different temperatures within a single Pt‐vein, and in adjacent Pt‐veins, and the constituent minerals melt selectively as the temperature rises beyond the melting points of different constituent minerals of the host rock. Neither preferential crushing of mafic minerals followed by bulk melting, nor eutectic (equilibrium) melting of the host rock can explain the strongly heterogeneous character of pseudotachylyte melt observed in this study.
Read full abstract