SESSION TITLE: Tuesday Electronic Posters 1 SESSION TYPE: Original Inv Poster Discussion PRESENTED ON: 10/22/2019 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM PURPOSE: Appropriate Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) antibiotic empiric selection represents a clinical and practical challenge for healthcare providers. We aimed to assess the appropriate, over- and under-utilization of anti-PA antibiotics when using the recommended regimen based on specific multi-drug resistant (MDR) scores for hospitalized adult patients with community acquire pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: We used the GLIMP study platform (international point-prevalence study) of adult patients hospitalized for CAP (n=3193)[1]. Anti-PA empiric utilization was tested according to the MDR scores: HCAP, Shorr, Shindo, DRIP, Park, Aliberti and GLIMP-PA derived (included: prior PA infection or colonization (pPA) +/- at least one lung disease (i.e. bronchiectasis, very severe COPD [FEV1 <30%], tracheostomy present on admission), respectively [1-7]. Scores were adapted accordingly, with the use of prior hospitalization and antibiotic therapies within one year prior to the index pneumonia hospitalization. The primary outcomes were whether appropriate, over- and under-utilization of anti-PA therapy was recommended. Appropriate use was defined when the score recommended anti-PA therapy when PA-CAP was diagnosed. Over-utilization refers to a score that recommends anti-PA coverage without PA-CAP confirmation. Underutilization was defined when the score did not recommend the use of anti-PA antibiotics when PA-CAP is confirmed. RESULTS: The different scores suggested anti-PA coverage for 22.2-49.0% of hospitalized CAP patients (except for GLIMP-PA [10.7%]). PA-CAP was diagnosed in 4.2% of patients (n=133). Appropriate suggested anti-PA coverage was 6.4%-Shorr, 7.1%-Shindo, 10.0%-DRIP, 7.3-%Park, 6.3%-Aliberti, 6.8%-HCAP and 20.5%-GLIMP-PA, respectively. Over-utilization of anti-PA therapy was 93.6%-Shorr, 92.9%-Shindo, 90.0%-DRIP, 92.7%-Park, 93.7%-Aliberti, 93.2%-HCAP and 79.5%-GLIMP-PA, respectively. Underutilization of anti-PA therapies was 2.0%-Shorr, 3.0%-Shindo, 2.5%-DRIP, 2.5%-HCAP, 2.6%-Park, 2.7%-Aliberti and 2.2%-GLIMP-PA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Specific PA scoring systems over recommend anti-PA antibiotics for adult patients with CAP and despite the strong concern for PA there is a very low underutilization risk. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Implementation programs may prevent over-utilization of antibiotics in patients admitted with CAP at risk for MDR pathogens, in particular PA. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Stefano Aliberti, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Marcos Restrepo, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Alejandro Rodriguez Oviedo, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Alexander Shaffer, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Nilam Soni, source=Web Response
Read full abstract