Determination of the presence of a pulse is critical in the management of cardiac arrest (CA) patients. However, reports have demonstrated the inaccuracy of manual pulse detection. Additionally, Doppler ultrasound may be too sensitive for pulse detection and could detect flow without adequate blood pressure needed for perfusion. The purpose of this study is to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of doppler femoral pulse detection in comparison to manual femoral pulse detection using an arterial line as the gold standard in CA patients. This is a prospective study of non-traumatic CA patients who occurred in a quarternary care emergency department (ED). All patients had an arterial line in place to serve as the gold standard for pulse detection. During a pulse check, the presence or absence of a femoral artery Doppler waveform and manual femoral pulse, as well as the systolic blood pressure (SBP) on the arterial line, were recorded simultaneously. Two physicians reviewed all Doppler waveform images to confirm presence or absence of a pulse. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both Doppler ultrasound and manual palpation for determining the presence of any pulse. We then calculated the same measurements using an arterial line SBP ≥60mmHg as consensus agreement believed this to be the minimum pressure indicating the presence of a pulse with an adequate perfusing blood pressure. We enrolled 46 patients and performed a total of 167 pulse checks. The sensitivity of Doppler ultrasound detection of a pulse at any blood pressure was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.97) with a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.00), and accuracy of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.97). The sensitivity and specificity of manual palpation of a pulse was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.44) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.00), respectively, with an accuracy of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.60). When a SBP ≥60mmHg was used to indicate the presence of an adequate pulse, the sensitivity of Doppler ultrasound was 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.00), however the specificity was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.64) with an accuracy 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.77), while manual palpation had a sensitivity of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.58), with a specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.89 and an accuracy of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.6, 0.76). This study indicates that while accuracy of Doppler ultrasound for pulse detection is superior to manual palpation, the overall accuracies are similar when a SBP ≥60mmHg is used to indicate the presence of a pulse perfusing blood pressure. This study identifies the need to determine if doppler ultrasound waveforms can further distinguish between an adequately perfusing pulse and pseudo pulseless electrical activity.