Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale Research Articles

Dupilumab Demonstrates a Higher Likelihood of Achieving Improvements in Signs, Symptoms, and Quality of Life vs. Tralokinumab at Week 16: Results from a Bucher Indirect Treatment Comparison

Background: Dupilumab and tralokinumab are biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), aged ≥6 months and ≥12 years, respectively. Dupilumab and tralokinumab have demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials. However, no direct head-to-head trials have been performed to compare the efficacy of dupilumab vs tralokinumab. The Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) is a robust, placebo-adjusted, and accepted method to evaluate the relative efficacy of drugs in the absence of direct comparisons. The objective of this analysis was to report results from a Bucher ITC comparing the efficacy of dupilumab+topical corticosteroid (TCS) vs tralokinumab+TCS at Week 16. Methods: The placebo-adjusted Bucher ITC included published data from the two similarly designed phase 3 trials, LIBERTY AD CHRONOS (NCT02260986) and ECZTRA 3 (NCT03363854). For both studies, data from the 16-week period were used, employing non-responder imputation, with the following doses: 300mg dupilumab every 2 weeks (q2w)+TCS or placebo+TCS, and 300mg tralokinumab q2w+TCS or placebo+TCS. The evaluated endpoints included the proportions of patients achieving an Investigator’s Global Assessment score 0/1 (IGA 0/1; clear/almost clear), 75% and 90% improvements from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75 and EASI-90), ≥4-point improvement from baseline in the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score (PP-NRS >4), and ≥4-point improvement from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI >4). The Bucher ITC with the frequentist approach was performed using R software (v 4.20; netmeta package) with a fixed-effect model. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 801 patients (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS: placebo+TCS: 315; dupilumab+TCS: 106; ECZTRA 3: placebo+TCS: 127; tralokinumab+TCS: 253) were included in the Bucher ITC. Baseline disease characteristics indicated comparable severity between the two trial populations based on IGA and PP-NRS. However, CHRONOS showed slightly higher baseline EASI scores (median [Q1, Q3] score 30.9 [22.3, 41.6] vs. ECZTRA 3: 24.7 [18.4, 35.9]), while ECZTRA 3 showed slightly higher DLQI scores (median [Q1, Q3] score 18.0 [12.0, 23.0] vs. CHRONOS: 13.5 [8.0, 20.0]). Patients treated with dupilumab+TCS had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving IGA 0/1 (OR=2.49, 95%CI 1.24–5.00), EASI-75 (OR=3.21, 95%CI 1.66–6.19), EASI-90 (OR=2.92, 95%CI 1.41–6.02), PP-NRS ≥4 (OR=3.62, 95%CI 1.87–7.00), and DLQI ≥4 (OR=2.16, 95%CI 1.03–4.54) at Week 16 vs those treated with tralokinumab+TCS. Conclusions: A placebo-adjusted Bucher ITC showed that the likelihood of achieving improvements in signs, symptom, and quality of life is significantly higher for patients treated with dupilumab+TCS vs tralokinumab+TCS at Week 16.

Persistent Inadequate Disease Control and Therapeutic Inertia in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 12-month Longitudinal Analysis of Real-world Outcomes from the TARGET-DERM AD registry

Background: Therapeutic inertia refers to the delay or failure in treatment escalation in patients not achieving adequate disease control; it is a challenge in the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Despite the availability of conventional (CST) and advanced systemic therapies (AST) utilized for the treatment of moderate to severe AD, many patients do not achieve treatment success. However, the extent of this inadequacy in real-world clinical practice remains underexplored. Objectives: This study evaluates the occurrence of therapeutic inertia and the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe AD who continue to show inadequate response after receiving systemic therapies for a duration from 3 to 12 months Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of patients with moderate-to-severe AD (vIGA-AD≥3) from the TARGET-DERM AD registry, including 3,457 participants from 39 centers in the U.S. and Canada. Eligible patients had documented outcomes at the initiation of systemic therapy and after 3 months up to 12 months of follow up. We assessed clinician- and patient-reported outcomes to identify the proportion of patients not meeting treatment targets based on expert consensus. An inadequate response was defined as not achieving a validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA-AD) score ≤2, a 50% improvement in Body Surface Area (BSA), and a ≥4-point reduction in the Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (WP-NRS). An optimal response was defined as a vIGA-AD score ≤1 (clear or almost clear skin), BSA ≤2%, and WP-NRS itch score of 0/1 (complete or almost complete skin resolution). Results: Out of 2,107 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, 445 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were adults (63.8%), female (62.0%), and Non-Hispanic White (45.4%), with an average age of 31 years. Most patients (88.8%) initiated treatment with AST, with dupilumab being the most common (86.5%). The mean vIGA-AD was 3.3 for AST and 3.6 for CST at initiation (P<0.01). At 6 months, 37% and 67% of AST-treated patients had inadequate responses in terms of skin clearance and itch outcomes, respectively, while 82% and 79% did not achieve optimal responses. At 12 months, these figures were approximately 30% and 66% for inadequate responses and 85% and 88% for not achieving optimal responses, respectively. CST-treated patients showed a similar trend. Conclusions: The study reveals that a significant portion of moderate-to-severe AD patients fail to achieve adequate disease control with systemic therapies over 12 months, indicating substantial presence of therapeutic inertia. These findings suggest a need for more proactive management strategies in AD treatment.

Achievement of No-to-minimal Itch and Sleep Improvement with Tapinarof Cream 1% Once Daily in Two Pivotal Phase 3 Trials in Adults and Children Down to 2 Years of Age with Atopic Dermatitis

Introduction: Itch frequently causes sleep disturbance in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). The gold-standard Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) improvement from baseline is 4 points; however, more stringent outcomes include achieving no-to-minimal itch (PP-NRS ≤1). Tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) demonstrated superior efficacy, including itch reduction, versus vehicle and was well tolerated in adults and children down to 2 years of age with AD in the ADORING 1 and 2 pivotal phase 3 trials. Here we present highly stringent itch outcomes and sleep improvement with tapinarof from these trials. Methods: In ADORING 1 and 2, patients with a Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis™ score ≥3 (moderate or severe), Eczema Area and Severity Index score ≥6, and body surface area involvement of 5–35% were randomized to tapinarof cream or vehicle QD for 8 weeks. Stringent PP-NRS assessments were analyzed post hoc and included achieving no‑to‑minimal itch (PP-NRS ≤1) or PP-NRS score <2. Mean weekly PP-NRS scores were assessed on an 11-point scale (0 indicates “no itch” and 10 is “worst imaginable itch”). The Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) question 2 evaluated sleep disturbance on a 5-point scale (0 indicates “no days” and 4 is “every day”); outcomes were pooled and stratified by age. Results: 407 and 406 patients were randomized in ADORING 1 and 2. Mean baseline scores were similar across ADORING 1 and 2 treatment groups: PP-NRS, 6.7 and 6.8; pooled POEM sleep disturbance scores, 2.0 (aged ≥12 years) and 2.4 (<12 years), respectively. Statistically significant achievement of no-to-minimal itch (PP-NRS ≤1), PP-NRS <2, and improvement in sleep were achieved with tapinarof versus vehicle as early as Week 1, the first assessment, and continued through Week 8. Stringent itch outcomes were achieved with tapinarof versus vehicle at Week 8: no-to-minimal itch, 31.4% versus 17.4% (P=0.0072) and 33.0% versus 14.0% (P=0.0003); and PP-NRS <2, 48.1% versus 28.4% (P=0.0006) and 46.8% versus 19.6% (P<0.0001) in ADORING 1 and 2, respectively. Sleep scores improved with tapinarof versus vehicle at Week 8: –1.4 versus –0.8 (≥12 years); –1.7 versus –1.0 (<12 years; both P<0.0001). Conclusion: Tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated early, significant, and meaningful achievement of no-to-minimal itch and improvement of sleep in adults and children down to 2 years of age with AD.

Long-Term Maintenance of Optimal Treatment Targets for Skin and Itch Outcomes With Upadacitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 140-Week Results From the Phase 3 Measure Up 1 and 2 Studies

Introduction: Despite undergoing prolonged systemic therapy, many patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) do not achieve optimal targets for skin and itch outcomes as defined by Aiming High in Eczema/AD (AHEAD) recommendations (eg, ≥90% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 90] and Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [WP-NRS] score of 0/1 [no/minimal itch]). We evaluated long-term maintenance of optimal treatment targets with upadacitinib, an oral selective JAK inhibitor approved for moderate-to-severe AD in adolescents and adults. Methods: This 140-week interim analysis included adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomized at baseline to upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) or 30 mg (UPA30) in the ongoing, phase 3, double-blind Measure Up 1 and 2 studies. Assessments included the proportion of patients (at the population level) who maintained EASI 90, WP-NRS 0/1, or simultaneous achievement of EASI 90 + WP-NRS 0/1 responses from week 16 (end of the placebo-controlled period) onwards. Data are reported as observed cases with no imputation for missing data. Results: Among patients who achieved EASI 90 at week 16 (UPA15, n=298; UPA30, n=384), EASI 90 was maintained by 79.8% (UPA15) and 83.7% (UPA30) at week 52, 76.7% (UPA15) and 83.0% (UPA30) at week 100, and 74.0% (UPA15) and 84.2% (UPA30) at week 140. Of patients achieving WP-NRS 0/1 at week 16 (UPA15, n=193; UPA30, n=281), WP-NRS 0/1 was maintained by 69.4% (UPA15) and 72.0% (UPA30) at week 52, 65.6% (UPA15) and 68.4% (UPA30) at week 100, and 62.3% (UPA15) and 66.0% (UPA30) at week 140. Of patients simultaneously achieving EASI 90 + WP-NRS 0/1 at week 16 (UPA15, n=156; UPA30, n=243), maintenance was achieved by 68.1% (UPA15) and 70.8% (UPA30) at week 52, 62.7% (UPA15) and 66.5% (UPA30) at week 100, and 58.7% (UPA15) and 64.4% (UPA30) at week 140. Among patients who did not maintain optimal outcomes, most still achieved clinically meaningful responses. Conclusion: Most patients maintained optimal skin and itch outcomes through 140 weeks of upadacitinib treatment, demonstrating its potential to provide sustained long-term disease control in atopic dermatitis.

Real-world efficacy and safety of dupilumab for paediatric atopic dermatitis: a multicentre retrospective study.

Real-world data regarding the use of dupilumab in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. To evaluate the real-world efficacy of dupilumab in children with moderate-to-severe AD over an extended follow-up period. This was a retrospective study of patients (≤ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab in four Israeli tertiary centres. Efficacy and safety were assessed using descriptive statistics. In total, 230 patients were included in the analysis [age 9.9 years (SD 4.3), male/female 1 : 1 ratio)]. Of them, 59.6% (137/230) had ≥ 1 atopic comorbidity. The follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 248 weeks, with a median of 52 weeks (interquartile range 24-96). Within 12 weeks of treatment, 41.7% (68/163) of patients had reached Investigator Global Assessment 0-1. The mean body surface area was reduced from 58.0% (SD 20.5%) at baseline to 27.8% (SD 20.2%) at 12 weeks. The average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale score was reduced from 7.9 (SD 2.2) at baseline to 2.3 (SD 2.8) at 12 weeks. Adverse events, in 210 patients, included conjunctivitis in 34 patients (16.2%), injection-site reactions in 11 patients (5.2%) and dupilumab-associated head and neck dermatitis in 6 patients (2.9%). Overall, 26 of 210 patients (12.3%) discontinued the treatment: 9 of the 26 patients (35%) because of adverse events and 15 patients (58%) because of inadequate efficacy. The overall probability of dupilumab survival at 52 weeks was 94.0%. Real-world data presented here for 230 paediatric and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD reinforce dupilumab's efficacy and safety and highlight dupilumab's high survival rate after 1 year of treatment in the paediatric population.

Rocatinlimab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase2b Study.

In adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), rocatinlimab demonstrated significant and progressive improvement in clinical measures of disease severity compared with placebo. This post hoc analysis of a phase2b study was undertaken to understand the disease burden and to assess the impact of rocatinlimab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This analysis used baseline data from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of adults with moderate-to-severe AD, who completed a Worst Pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS), Sleep Disturbance NRS, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A mixed model for repeated measures was used to estimate changes in PRO scores from baseline; scores were also compared with clinically meaningful change benchmarks. The analysis included 267 subjects, mean (SD) age 37.9 (14.7) years, 40.8% female; 55.1% grade3 and 44.9% grade4 Investigator Global Assessment for AD. Mean (SD) scores were: Worst Pruritus NRS 7.5 (1.9), Sleep Disturbance NRS 5.5 (2.9), DLQI total score 12.6 (7.1). Worst Pruritus and Sleep NRS scores had low positive correlations with SCORing AD (SCORAD) score (r = 0.44, r = 0.45 respectively) and negligible correlations with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and area affected (r < 0.30). DLQI score varied by sex, study country, race, age, longer disease duration, disease severity (EASI and SCORAD), presence of asthma, and Worst Pruritus NRS, Sleep disturbance NRS, and DLQI scores. Rocatinlimab showed benefit on all three PROs, with significant improvements from baseline at the end of the double-blind period (week18) and active treatment extension (week36). Benefits were maintained over 20weeks' post-treatment follow-up. The benefit of rocatinlimab treatment on PROs is rapid and maintained for at least 20weeks following treatment completion. This analysis demonstrates the importance of characterizing the burden of moderate-to-severe AD from the patient's perspective, alongside clinical disease measures, to develop a fuller picture of treatment benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03703102.

Success of Immunopathogenetic Therapy for Management of Congenital Ichthyosis, Combined Form, in a Child: Rare Clinical Case

Background. Congenital ichthyosis (CI) is relating to the group of clinical and genetically heterogeneous severe genodermatoses. SAM syndrome is included in classification of CI syndromic forms. Defects in the desmoplakin (DSP) and desmoglein 1 (DSG1) genes are the prime cause of disease. Impaired function of encoded proteins leads to desmosomal anomalies and disease symptoms. Comorbid atopic syndrome becomes the major cause of diagnostic mistakes. Patients are observed continuously with diagnosis “Atopic dermatitis (AD) torpid to standard treatment methods”. Clinical case description. This article describes a rare case of a boy with severe AD. Despite the chronic dermatosis several systemic disorders were revealed during examination: short stature, protein-energy malnutrition, adrenal insufficiency, juvenile polyarthritis, vitamin D deficiency, onychodystrophy, dysmorphic disorders. Molecular genetic study conducted via high-throughput sequencing followed by validation with Sanger sequencing has revealed two genetic variants: novel variant chr18:28934543G&gt;T in the DSG1 gene in the heterozygous state and pathogenic variant chr5:157468728C&gt;A in the NIPAL4 gene in the homozygous state. As a result, the final diagnosis was established: “SAM syndrome. Congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma”. Flow cytometry immunology study has shown dominant immunological profile of Th17-, and Thact-lymphocyte proliferation. The immunobiological therapy with IL-17A inhibitor, secukinumab, was initiated. Clinical efficacy was evaluated via ISS (Ichthyosis Severity Index), CDLQI (Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index), pruritus numerical rating scale. ISS was 5.8 points, pruritus scale — 9, CDLQI — 24 at therapy initiation. Improvement in the skin condition was observed after a month of therapy. ISS was 1.2 points, pruritus scale — 2, CDLQI — 4 6 months after the therapy initiation. Conclusion. The diagnosis of a child with combined form of CI made it possible to change the management strategy, to prescribe pathogenetically justified targeted immunobiological therapy, and to achieve significant improvement in the child's health and quality of life, which does not differ from healthy peers.

Long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 52-week results from a phase 3 trial.

Management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) needs long-term therapy. Stapokibart is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 receptor α subunit (IL-4Rα), a shared receptor for IL-4 and IL-13 which are key pathogenic drivers of AD. In a pivotal phase 3 trial (NCT05265923), significant higher proportions of adult AD patients receiving stapokibart than placebo achieved ≥75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75; 66.9% vs. 25.8%) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 with ≥2-point reduction (44.2% vs. 16.1%) at Week 16. Herein, we report long-term (52 weeks) efficacy and safety of stapokibart from this trial. After 16-week double-blind treatment completed, patients in both stapokibart and placebo groups entered a 36-week maintenance treatment period and received stapokibart 300 mg every 2 weeks. Concomitant use of topical medications for AD was permitted throughout the maintenance period. Of 476 patients entering maintenance period, 430 completed the treatment. At Week 52, EASI-75 was achieved in 92.5% of patients continuing stapokibart and 88.7% of those switching from placebo to stapokibart, respectively; an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-point reduction was achieved in 67.3% and 64.2% of patients, respectively; a ≥4-point reduction in weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) was achieved in 67.3% and 60.5% of patients, respectively. Over the 52-week treatment period, 88.1% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events, most were mild or moderate. Long-term treatment with stapokibart demonstrated a sustained efficacy and favorable safety profile in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Upadacitinib in Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up studies demonstrated the efficacy and adverse events of upadacitinib through 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD); however, longer-term outcomes (longer than 1 year) in adolescents have not previously been available. To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of upadacitinib in adolescent patients with moderate to severe AD through 76 weeks. The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up trials are ongoing double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trials including adolescents (aged 12 to 17 years) with moderate to severe AD. Data were collected from August 2018 to April 2022, and data were analyzed from June 2022 to September 2023. Adolescents were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily oral upadacitinib, 15 mg; upadacitinib, 30 mg; or placebo, either alone (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 trials) or with topical corticosteroids (AD Up). At week 16, placebo-treated patients were rerandomized to receive upadacitinib, 15 mg, or upadacitinib, 30 mg, daily. Coprimary end points assessing efficacy included achievement of 75% reduction or more in the Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI-75) from baseline, Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with 2 grades or more of improvement, and Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) improvement of 4 points or greater through week 76 for participants with a WP-NRS score of 4 points or higher at baseline. From all studies, 542 adolescents were included; of these, 284 (52.4%) were female. At week 76, among patients in the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up trials, EASI-75 was achieved by 89.1%, 84.4%, and 87.8% of adolescents taking upadacitinib, 15 mg, respectively, and by 96.1%, 93.6%, and 82.7% of adolescents taking upadacitinib, 30 mg, indicating maintenance or improvement of EASI-75 across 76 weeks with upadacitinib. Efficacy measured by achievement of vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1 and WP-NRS improvement of 4 points or more from baseline was similarly maintained or improved through week 76 for adolescents taking upadacitinib, 15 mg or 30 mg. Long-term outcomes in Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up participants were consistent with the known adverse event profile of upadacitinib (herpetic infection: 4.0, 1.9, and 1.1 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; creatine kinase elevation: 11.6, 11.0, and 7.1 events per 100 patient-years); no new signals were observed with either dose. In this study assessing 3 randomized clinical trials, long-term treatment of adolescents with moderate to severe AD with upadacitinib demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile, with sustained efficacy responses through 76 weeks. Measure Up 1 trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03569293; Measure Up 2 trial: NCT03607422; AD Up trial: NCT03568318.

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs Dupilumab in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Week 16 results of an Open-label, Randomized, Efficacy Assessor-Blinded Head-to-Head Phase 3b/4 Study (Level Up).

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease characterized by intense itch and eczematous skin lesions. Some patients continue to experience flares and substantial clinical burden despite ongoing systemic treatment. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily upadacitinib (UPA), initiated at 15 mg and dose-escalated to 30 mg based on clinical response, compared with dupilumab (DUPI) per its label. Week 16 primary analysis results are presented. Level Up is a phase 3b/4 global, randomized, open-label, efficacy assessor blinded study evaluating UPA vs DUPI in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD who had inadequate response to systemic therapy or when use was inadvisable. Patients were randomized to UPA or DUPI for 16 weeks of treatment (Period 1). Patients on UPA started on 15 mg and were dose-escalated to 30 mg if they did not achieve an Eczema Area and Severity Index reduction of at least 50% (EASI 50) or a ≥4-point Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) improvement on/after Week 4, or EASI 75 on/after Week 8. The primary endpoint was simultaneous achievement of EASI 90 and WP-NRS 0/1 at Week 16. Ranked secondary endpoints included skin and itch responses at varying response levels and timepoints. Safety measures were assessed throughout the study. Superior efficacy in achieving simultaneous EASI 90 and WP-NRS 0/1 response at Week 16 was demonstrated with UPA vs DUPI (19.9% vs 8.9%, respectively; p<0.0001). UPA showed superiority vs DUPI for all ranked secondary endpoints, with post-hoc analyses exhibiting higher itch response rates as early as Day 2. No new safety signals were identified during this period. Treatment of moderate-to-severe AD with UPA, initiated at 15 mg and dose escalated based on clinical response, demonstrated superiority vs DUPI per its label for the primary endpoint of simultaneous achievement of near complete skin clearance (EASI 90) and little to no itch (WP-NRS 0/1) at Week 16, with all ranked secondary endpoints demonstrating superiority at varying skin and itch response levels and timepoints. There were no new safety signals identified compared to the previously reported safety profiles of UPA and DUPI.

Unveiling the Impact of Moderate and Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Insights on Burden, Clinical Characteristics, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Adult Greek Patients from the APOLO Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Moderate to severe (M2S) atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic condition impacting individuals, society, and healthcare systems. Considering the changing M2S-AD treatment landscape, this study assesses the M2S-AD burden in patients reaching referral centers in Greece. Methods: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Patients aged 12 years or older with clinically diagnosed M2S-AD were enrolled. Data collected included clinical practice assessments and the following validated patient-reported instruments: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Level scale (EQ-5D-3L); Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM); Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS); and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI:GH). A pain frequency/intensity/cause questionnaire and a sleep disturbance scale were also used. Results: Outcomes of 184 adults (51.1% female) with M2S-AD based on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) are presented (n = 117 moderate; n = 67 severe). Among the patients, 14.8% were obese, 59.2% had allergic comorbidities, and 88.0% were receiving AD-specific therapy (systemic: 38.6%). The median age, disease duration, body surface area, and total EASI scores were 38.8 years, 11.8 years, 30.0%, and 16.9, respectively. The median DLQI score was 12.0, with 'symptoms/feelings' being the most affected domain. EQ-5D dimensions 'anxiety/depression' and 'pain/discomfort' were also affected (65.2% and 64.1% reporting problems, respectively). The median POEM score was 17.0. Pain, severe pruritus (PP-NRS ≥ 7), and sleep disturbance were reported by 80.4%, 62.0%, and 88.5%, respectively. The median WPAI:GH 'work productivity loss' and 'activity impairment' scores were 23.8% and 30.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Both moderate and severe AD patients reaching Greek specialized centers experience significant symptom burden and impairments in quality of life, sleep, work, and daily activities.

Real-World Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab in Bullous Pemphigoid: An Ambispective Multicenter Case Series.

Bullous pemphigoid affects elderly individuals with multiple comorbidities, making conventional treatments unsuitable. Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. A multicenter ambispective cohort study was conducted in 34 hospitals. Patients with bullous pemphigoid treated with Dupilumab were included. Most of patients (97.1%) received an initial 600 mg dose followed by 300 mg every two weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving complete remission within 4 weeks, defined as Investigator Global Assessment score of 0 or 1. Complete remission at weeks 16, 24, and 52, adverse events, reductions in peak pruritus numerical rating scale, and systemic glucocorticoid use were also assessed. The study included 103 patients with a median age of 77.3 years, 58.0% male. Complete remission was achieved by 53.4% within 4 weeks and 95.7% by week 52. Peak pruritus scale reduced by 70.0% by week 4 and was completely controlled by week 24. Thirteen patients presented adverse events, most of which were mild. Systemic glucocorticoid use reduced by 82.1% by week 52. Shorter disease duration and exclusive cutaneous involvement predicted better response at 16 weeks. No differences in response rates to dupilumab were observed between drug-associated bullous pemphigoid and idiopathic cases. No significant difference in response rates was observed between patients treated with dupilumab in monotherapy and those receiving dupilumab with concomitant treatments. Dupilumab is effective, rapid, and safe in managing bullous pemphigoid, reducing the need for corticosteroids and other treatments. Early initiation and exclusive skin involvement predict better outcomes.

Effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib retreatment after withdrawal in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a retrospective study.

Upadacitinib, a janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, is effective for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Upadacitinib treatment may be discontinued in some patients, however, the effectiveness and safety of retreatment after its withdrawal have not been precisely examined in real-world practice. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib retreatment after withdrawal in real-world clinical practice for Japanese AD patients. This retrospective study included 62 Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with upadacitinib 15 mg (n = 38) or 30 mg (n = 24). Effectiveness was assessed using eczema area severity index (EASI) and peak pruritus numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) before treatment (baseline), at time-periods of discontinuation, retreatment, and week 12 after retreatment of upadacitinib. Safety was evaluated through the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). EASI and PP-NRS scores significantly decreased at week 12 after retreatment of upadacitinib compared to baseline in both 15 mg and 30 mg groups. Achievement rates of EASI 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 at week 12 after retreatment were 83.8%, 56.8%, and 18.9% in 15 mg group, and 87.0%, 56.5%, and 17.4% in 30 mg group, respectively. TEAEs were mild or moderate, and no serious adverse events or deaths were reported. Retreatment of upadacitinib after withdrawal effectively improved clinical signs and pruritus in patients with AD, with a manageable safety profile, supporting its use for long-term management of AD.

Content Evaluation of Pruritus, Skin Pain, and Sleep Disturbance Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adolescents and Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Qualitative Interviews.

Pruritus, skin pain, and sleep disturbance are a significant burden to individuals with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and negatively impact quality of life. Fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess AD-related pruritus, skin pain, and sleep disturbance are important for evaluating the effectiveness of new AD treatments. To evaluate content validity of five AD-related PROMs in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD (the Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale [NRS], the AD Skin Pain NRS; the Sleep Disturbance NRS, the skin pain-specific Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC], and the skin pain-specific Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGIS]) and to assess patient-reported experience with pruritus, skin pain, and sleep disturbance. A qualitative study in adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and adults with moderate-to-severe AD was conducted in two consecutive stages. In each stage, two iterative rounds of individual interviews were conducted by experienced interviewers. All interviews included concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing components. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. A total of 27 adults and 20 adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD participated in the initial content evaluation (Stage 1) of the Worst Pruritus NRS [1.0] and AD Skin Pain NRS [1.0] (n = 26; 16 adults, 10 adolescents) and in the subsequent content evaluation (Stage 2) of the revised Worst Pruritus NRS [1.1], revised AD Skin Pain NRS [1.1], Sleep Disturbance NRS, skin pain-specific PGIC, and skin pain-specific PGIS (n = 21; 11 adults, 10 adolescents). Results were generally aligned and consistent for both adult and adolescent participants. Additionally, we found that sleep disturbance is relevant and important for evaluation in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD (Stage 2), while also providing further confirmation of this for pruritus and skin pain (Stages 1 and 2). Our findings support the content validity of the revised Worst Pruritus NRS [1.1], revised AD Skin Pain NRS [1.1], Sleep Disturbance NRS, skin pain-specific PGIC, and skin pain-specific PGIS in individuals aged ≥12 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Furthermore, the findings support sleep disturbance, skin pain, and pruritus as being relevant and important features for both adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Effects of Tralokinumab on Clinical and Laboratory Indexes in Atopic Dermatitis: A 24-Week Real-World Study.

Background: Tralokinumab, a monoclonal anti-IL-13 antibody, is approved for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). Real-world data on its effectiveness and safety are limited. Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab and the transition of laboratory indexes during 24-week treatment for AD patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 104 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with tralokinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks after primary 600 mg. Clinical and laboratory indexes were assessed until week 24. Results: At week 24, achievement rates of Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI 75), EASI 90, and investigator's global assessment 0 out of 1 in systemic therapy-naïve patients, 83.3%, 72.2%, and 44.4%, respectively, were higher than those in systemic therapy-experienced patients, 46.7%, 20.0%, and 6.7%, respectively. Serum levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE), thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) significantly decreased at week 24, whereas neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) significantly decreased at week 12 from baseline. Twenty-nine patients (27.9%) experienced mild treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusions: Tralokinumab treatment showed prosperous therapeutic effects and good tolerability in real-world practice for AD, with higher effectiveness in patients without prior systemic therapy compared with those with prior systemic therapy. Tralokinumab treatment significantly decreased clinical and laboratory indexes, EASI, Peak Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale, IgE, TARC, LDH, NLR, and SIRI.

Improvement Across Dimensions of Disease with Lebrikizumab Use in Atopic Dermatitis: Two Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Monotherapy Trials (ADvocate1 and ADvocate2).

Atopic dermatitis is a complex, chronic, inflammatory skin disease thatrequires long-term control of symptoms like itch and sleep loss and improvement in quality of life, in addition to reduction of clinical signs. Lebrikizumab is a selective interleukin-13 inhibitor approved in the European Union, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Canada, and Japan for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents. Here, we assess the magnitude of changes across signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis with lebrikizumab monotherapy over the 16-week induction period in two phase 3 studies, ADvocate1 and ADvocate2. Eligible adults (aged≥18years) and adolescents (aged 12 to<18years and weighing≥40kg) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis were randomized to receive either 250mg of lebrikizumab or placebo subcutaneously every two weeks. Least squares mean percentage change from baseline through week 16 was compared between lebrikizumab and placebo using mixed model repeated measure analysis for the following endpoints: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Sleep-Loss Scale, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). In both trials, significant (P<0.05) improvements were observed for lebrikizumab treatment compared with placebo at each 2-week timepoint for EASI, Pruritus NRS, Sleep-Loss Scale, and POEM, and at each 4-week timepoint for DLQI, through week 16. Statistically significant (P<0.001) improvements were observed at 16weeks for lebrikizumab treatment versus placebo in ADvocate1/ADvocate2 for EASI (71.9%/75.0% vs. 35.6%/43.3%), Pruritus NRS (53.3%/46.3% vs. 21.4%/18.0%), Sleep-Loss Scale (57.7%/55.6% vs. 23.9%/25.5%), POEM (54.4%/45.8% vs. 18.8%/16.9%), and DLQI (64.2%/60.5% vs. 28.5%/32.2%). Patient photos show improvements in skin appearance when disease measures improve. Lebrikizumab monotherapy resulted in significant and fast improvements in multiple dimensions of disease (clinical signs, symptoms, and quality of life) over 16weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT04146363; NCT04178967.

Cost per responder analysis of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

The JADE COMPARE was a multicenter, phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with the objective of comparing the 16-week efficacy and safety of oral abrocitinib 100 or 200 mg once daily, dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks, or placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of these new drugs for AD is lacking. The objective of our study was to compare the cost per responder of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in patients with AD using the data from the JADE COMPARE trial. The cost per responder was calculated by multiplying the cost of treatment by the number needed to treat for each therapy, as obtained from the JADE COMPARE trial. The 12-week primary endpoint was the Investigator global assessment (IGA) 0/1 and eczema area and severity index improvement of at least 75% (EASI75) response rate. The key secondary end points were itch response (defined as an improvement of ≥4 points in the score on the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10]) at week 2 and IGA and EASI-75 responses at week 16. The cost per responder model was based on the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Regarding the costs of drugs, ex-factory wholesale purchase prices were used, including the mandatory discounts according to the national legislation (5% discount, plus a further 5% reduction on the discount result). Abrocitinib 100 mg and 200 mg have flat price in Italy. The 12-week IGA 0/1 cost per responder was € 3955.77 and € 2984.94 for abrocitinib 100 mg and 200 mg, respectively, versus € 7467.96 for dupilumab; as for 12-week EASI75 the cost were € 2463.30 and € 2057.58 vs. € 4705.09, respectively. As far as the secondary end points, the costs per responder were always lower for abrocitinib 100 and 200 mg compared to dupilumab, including the PP-NRS (€ 3791.55 and € 2451.22, vs. € 6462.65), the IGA 0/1 at week 16 (€ 6931.05 and € 4854.15 vs. € 8787.85) and the EASI75 at week 16 (€ 3984.75 and € 3381.00 vs. € 5197.45). According to JADE COMPARE trial data, the costs per responder of abrocitinib were considerably lower than dupilumab. The results of the study are limited to the short time frame of JADE COMPARE trial.

Validation of the Peak Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: results from a phase 2 study.

Pruritus is a common, bothersome symptom for patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (PsO), yet no validated scale assesses it in this patient population. We aimed to validate the Peak Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) using data from a Phase 2b study investigating the efficacy of brepocitinib in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic PsO. Patients completed the PP-NRS daily from baseline for the first 2 weeks after the dose administration and subsequently only on visit days. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), construct validity (known group validity and convergent validity), ability to detect change, and meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) were evaluated using correlation and regression analyses. The PP-NRS demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.86-0.89). Known-group evidence demonstrated that PP-NRS scores could discriminate between different degrees of disease severity. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlation coefficients between the PP-NRS and Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Psoriasis Symptom Inventory, which generally exceeded 0.50. The ability to detect change was evidenced by an approximately linear relationship between changes in PP-NRS and Physician Global Assessment or PtGA of psoriasis scores. The value of 2.8 was determined as the MWPC for the PP-NRS. PP-NRS is a reliable, practical test for assessing pruritus in mild-to-moderate PsO clinical trials. NCT03850483.

More Time Spent with Clear Skin and No Itch with Upadacitinib versus Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), with its hallmark symptoms of pruritus and skin lesions, often impairs patients' quality of life. We assessed time spent with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch during upadacitinib treatment versus placebo or dupilumab among patients with moderate-to-severe AD. This analysis consisted of a post hoc analysis of Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 were replicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies with patients randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily oral upadacitinib 15mg, upadacitinib 30mg, or placebo for 16weeks. Heads Up was a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3b study with patients randomized (1:1) to upadacitinib 30mg or subcutaneous dupilumab 300mg for 24weeks. Skin clearance was assessed with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at baseline, weeks 1, 2, and 4, and every 4weeks thereafter. Itch was assessed using the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) daily over 16weeks and every 2weeks thereafter to week 24 in Heads Up. This analysis included 1683 patients in Measure Up 1 and 2 and 673 patients in Heads Up. Through 16weeks in Measure Up 1 and 2, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 9.8-13.4 times as many days with an EASI 90 response and 7.0-10.3 times as many days with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus placebo. In Heads Up, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 2.0 and 1.7 times as many days through 16 and 24weeks, respectively, with an EASI 90 response versus dupilumab. Through 16 and 24weeks, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 3.0 and 2.6 times as many days, respectively, with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus dupilumab. Patients with moderate-to-severe AD spent more time with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch with upadacitinib versus placebo or dupilumab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), Heads Up (NCT03738397).

Tralokinumab for the Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis in Special Populations.

Even if mild forms of atopic dermatitis (AD) are usually well controlled with topical prescription drugs and emollients, the management of severe forms of the disease may be challenging, especially in special populations (SPs). These patients include groups of disadvantaged people (elderly, patients with disabilities and serious medical conditions) who are usually excluded from clinical trials. As a consequence, most of the data about the efficacy and safety of a drug in these patients derives from post-marketing experiences. In this context, the aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in the management of AD in SPs. A 24-weeks retrospective, dual-center study was performed enrolling patients with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD undergoing treatment with tralokinumab at labelled dosage. Disease severity was assessed using Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score at baseline and after 4 weeks (W4), W16, and W24. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored at the same timepoints. Statistical significance of clinical improvement (EASI, P-NRS, DLQI) at week 4, week 16, and week 24 as compared with baseline was evaluated by using Student's t-test, considering significant a p-value <0.05. Our study enrolling 27 SPs patients showed a significant improvement in EASI and P-NRS since week 4, continuing to improve up to week 24. Similarly, DLQI significantly decreases at each timepoint as compared with baseline. Finally, no AEs were reported during the study period. Of interest, our cohort included oncologic patients, a patient with a history of severe infection, as well as subjects affected by severe neurological, psychiatric, pulmonary, and/or cardiovascular disease. Our experience showed that tralokinumab is effective and safe in elderly patients and subjects affected by severe comorbidities.