Proximal Radius Fractures Research Articles

Recovery of Comfort and Capability After Upper Extremity Fracture Is Predominantly Associated With Mindset: A Longitudinal Cohort From the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative influence of mindset and fracture severity on 9-month recovery trajectories of pain and capability after upper extremity fractures. METHODS: Design: Secondary use of longitudinal data. Setting: Single Level-1 trauma center in Oxford, United Kingdom. Patient selection: English-speaking adults with isolated proximal humerus, elbow, or distal radius fracture managed operatively or nonoperatively were included, and those with multiple fractures or cognitive deficit were excluded. Outcome measures and comparisons: Incapability (Quick-DASH) and pain intensity (11-point rating scale) were measured at baseline, 2–4 weeks, and 6–9 months after injury. Cluster analysis was used to identify statistical groupings of mindset (PROMIS Depression and Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) and fracture severity (low/moderate/high based on OTA/AO classification). The recovery trajectories of incapability and pain intensity for each mindset grouping were assessed, accounting for various fracture-related aspects. RESULTS: Among 703 included patients (age 59 ± 21 years, 66% women, 16% high-energy injury), 4 statistical groupings with escalating levels of distress and unhelpful thoughts were identified (fracture severity was omitted considering it had no differentiating effect). Groups with less healthy mindset had a worse baseline incapability (group 2: β = 4.1, 3: β = 7.5, and 4: β = 17) and pain intensity (group 3: β = 0.70 and 4: β = 1.4) (P < 0.01). Higher fracture severity (β = 4.5), high-energy injury (β = 4.0), and nerve palsy (β = 8.1) were associated with worse baseline incapability (P < 0.01), and high-energy injury (β = 0.62) and nerve palsy (β = 0.76) with worse baseline pain intensity (P < 0.01). Groups 3 and 4 had a prolonged rate of recovery of incapability (β = 1.3, β = 7.0) and pain intensity (β = 0.19, β = 1.1) (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher levels of unhelpful thinking and feelings of distress regarding symptoms experienced worse recovery of pain and incapability, with a higher effect size than fracture location, fracture severity, high-energy injury, and nerve palsy. These findings underline the importance of anticipating and addressing mental health concerns during recovery from injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A case report of fracture of proximal ulna and radius in children with dislocation of elbow joint

A case report of fracture of proximal ulna and radius in children with dislocation of elbow joint

Management of long bone fractures and traumatic hip dislocations in paediatric patients: study protocol for a prospective global multicentre observational cohort registry

IntroductionManagement controversy and clinical equipoise exist in treatments of long bone fractures and traumatic hip dislocation in paediatric patients due to the lack of high-quality clinical evidence. This protocol describes...

Management of gunshot wounds near the elbow: experiences at a high-volume level I trauma center.

Gunshot-related fractures near the elbow are challenging, and available data to guide the practitioner are lacking. This report analyzes injury patterns and treatment strategies in a case series from a high-volume urban trauma center. All periarticular gunshot fractures near the elbow treated at a level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fracture location, patient demographics, concomitant injuries, treatment modalities, and complications were analyzed. Twenty-four patients were identified. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics upon admission and underwent urgent surgical debridement. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed with initial debridement in 22 of 24 patients. Seven patients sustained distal humerus fractures, 10 patients sustained isolated proximal ulna or proximal radius fractures, and seven had combined fracture patterns. Eleven patients presented with nerve palsy, and two had transected nerves. Two patients had vascular injury requiring repair. One patient required a temporary elbow-spanning external fixator and underwent staged debridement followed by ORIF. One patient with a grade IIIC fracture developed a deep infection that precluded ORIF. One patient required revision ORIF due to fracture displacement. This investigation reports on management of ballistic fractures near the elbow at a busy urban level I trauma center. Our management centered on rapid debridement, early definitive fixation, and intravenous antibiotic administration. We report on associated neurovascular injury, bone loss, and other challenges in this patient population. Level of evidence: IV.

"Unhappy triad" of the trauma elbow in children: Diagnosis, classification, and mid-term outcomes.

The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology, physiopathology, and outcomes of elbow "unhappy triad" trauma in children, combining a posterior dislocation, a proximal radius fracture, and a third lesion (i.e. bony or capsuloligamentous injury). A retrospective bicentric study was conducted between 1999 and 2020. All skeletally immature children who presented to the emergency department and underwent surgery for a proximal radius injury were selected. Among this selection, only patients with two associated ipsilateral elbow injuries (i.e. posterior elbow dislocation and a bony and/or capsuloligamentous injury) were included. Active elbow ranges of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Quick-Disabilities Of The Arm, Shoulder And Hand scores and standard radiographs were recorded at last follow-up. Twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age at surgery = 11.4 years) among 737 selected. The "unhappy triad" diagnosis was made preoperatively in nine cases (bone lesion only), intraoperatively in nine cases, and postoperatively in one case. The third lesions were surgically treated when the lesion was a bony fracture or if the elbow remains unstable between 60° and 90° of flexion (i.e. capsuloligamentous injury). Twenty patients were reviewed (mean follow-up = 5.8 years). The complications and re-operations rates were of 10%. The "unhappy" triad of the child's elbow is a rare injury, where the preoperative diagnosis is frequently missed and lead to 10% of complications and re-operations. level III.

Recurrent Infections After Percutaneous Pinning of a Proximal Radius and Ulna Fracture.

Elbow fractures in the pediatric population are an exceedingly common injury, comprising 5% to 10% of all pediatric fractures, with supracondylar fractures being the most common of the subset. Radial neck fractures are less frequent, comprising only 1% of all pediatric fractures. We provide a case report of a 7-year-old girl with a left radial neck and proximal ulna fracture. A 7-year-old girl presented to the emergency department after falling off a rock wall the day before. Imaging showed a left proximal ulna and proximal radial neck fracture. The patient underwent percutaneous reduction and fixation, complicated by subsequent infection requiring surgical débridement. The patient then developed a recurrent infection 1 year later, requiring repeat irrigation and débridement. The patient has since made a full recovery, returned to activities of daily living, and regained a full range of motion. Radial neck fractures have a low incidence and have been frequently associated with poor outcomes. The main mechanism by which these fractures occur is due to falling on an outstretched arm. Percutaneous pinning is often recommended after unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction because open reduction is often complicated by postoperative stiffness. As with any procedure that involves breaking the skin, there is a risk of infection. However, there is unclear evidence regarding ideal perioperative management to prevent postoperative infection.

Minimally invasive distal biceps tendon repair: a case series.

Distal biceps tendon repairs are commonly performed using open techniques. A minimally invasive distal biceps tendon repair technique using a speculum and hooded endoscope was developed to improve visualization, reduce soft-tissue dissection, and minimize complications. This paper describes the technique and reports the outcomes of 75 minimally invasive distal biceps tendon repairs. The operation reports and outcomes of 75 patients who underwent distal biceps tendon repair using this technique between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Median time to follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-56 months). Primary outcomes were function as measured by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) questionnaire, and rate of complications. Median DASH score was 1.7 of 100 (IQR, 0-6.8). There were 2 of 75 (2.7%) re-ruptures of the distal tendon. There were no cases of vascular injury, proximal radius fracture, or posterior interosseous nerve, median, or ulnar nerve palsy. In this series, minimally invasive distal biceps repair was safe and effective with a low rate of major complications. Recovery of function, as indicated by low DASH scores, was satisfactory, and inconvenience during recovery was minimized. Level of evidence: IV.

Impact of COVID-19 on Fracture Incidence in Germany: A Comparative Age and Gender Analysis of Pre- and Post-Outbreak Periods.

In March 2020, Germany imposed a nationwide lockdown to curb the spread of COVID-19, prompting questions about the impact on the incidence of common fractures. This study examined 15 fracture types in pre-outbreak (2010-2019) and post-outbreak (2020-2021) periods, using data categorized by age (18-64 years, >65 years) and sex (male, female). Linear regression assessed annual growth rates, and mean fracture numbers were compared across periods for significant differences. Results indicated a positive correlation between fracture incidence rates and time for various types, such as cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic spine fractures, rib fractures, femoral neck, pertrochanteric femur, femoral shaft, and ankle fractures. Frequencies of proximal humerus, distal radius, femoral neck, pertrochanteric femur, femoral shaft, and ankle fractures in 2020 and 2021 were within predicted ranges from previous years. However, rib fractures and spinal fractures (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic spine) occurred less frequently during this time. Notably, this study found a consistent decline in most fracture types for individuals aged 18-64 after the pandemic's onset, while the fracture incidence of hip fractures, often referred to as fragility fractures, for those over 65 remained unchanged. Fibula fractures showed the most considerable decrease in both age groups. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic substantially impacted fracture incidence, with lower rates among individuals under 65 and unchanged fragility fractures in the elderly population.

RADIAL HEAD FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMY, MECHANISM OF INJURY, CLASSIFICATION, IMAGING PRESENTATION, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, MANAGEMENT AND COMPLICATIONS

Introduction: In recent years the understanding and comprehension of the elbow has improved, clarifying some aspects of the complex diarthrodial joint. The relevance of the radial head in the biomechanics of the elbow is recognized which helps to improve the management and treatment of fractures at this site. Elbow trauma is the most common origin of proximal radius fractures, this trauma can be direct or indirect and can cause an isolated fracture, a fracture associated with other fractures and ligament injuries. Objective: to detail the current information related to radial head fractures, epidemiology, anatomy, presentation, clinical evaluation, imaging evaluation, classification, treatment and complications. Methodology: a total of 42 articles were analyzed in this review, including review and original articles, as well as clinical cases, of which 31 bibliographies were used because the other articles were not relevant to this study. The sources of information were PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane; the terms used to search for information in Spanish, Portuguese and English were: radial head fractures, radial head prosthesis, radial head arthroplasty. Results: Radial head fractures have an incidence of 2.5 per 10,000 per year, which represents 1.7 to 5.4% of all fractures. Most radial head injuries are the result of a fall on the hand in extension. Usually the affected individuals show limitation of mobility of the forearm and elbow in addition to pain or discomfort when making passive rotational movement of the forearm; they also usually present pain on palpation over the radial head and joint effusion in the elbow. Sometimes there is a fracture-dislocation of the radial head related to a rupture of the interosseous membrane with lesion of the distal radioulnar joint called Essex-Lopresti lesion. Conclusions: The radial head together with the interosseous membrane of the forearm provide longitudinal stability; when the interosseous membrane is damaged, a proximal migration of the radial head may occur after removal of the radial head. When presenting clinical suspicion of elbow fracture, standard anteroposterior and lateral projections of the elbow should be requested, as well as oblique projections such as the Greenspan projection. The Manson, Mason-Johnston or Mason classification modified by Hotchkiss is usually used for classification. Among the indications for conservative treatment are solitary, undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures that do not present mechanical blockages in the range of motion or less than 3 mm of displacement. Studies report the effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation of simple Mason type II fractures; Manson type III fractures are controversial. Complications usually arise from contracture subsequent to prolonged immobilization or secondary to persistent pain, edema and swelling; which may be due to undiagnosed osteochondral injury of the capitellum. KEY WORDS: fracture, radius, head, prosthesis, elbow.

The Role of External Fixation in the Management of Upper Extremity Fractures.

External fixation is a powerful tool in the armamentarium of the active orthopaedic surgeon. The upper extremity, however, poses unique challenges in the techniques of external fixation because of the smaller soft-tissue envelope and the proximity of neurovascular structures, which may be entrapped in fracture fragments or traversing in line with pin trajectories. This review article summarizes the indications, techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications of external fixation of the upper extremity in the setting of proximal humerus, humeral shaft, distal humerus, elbow, forearm, and distal radius fractures.

Diagnosis, treatment and complications of radial head and neck fractures in the pediatric patient.

Radial head and neck fractures represent up to 14% of all pediatric elbow fractures and can be a difficult challenge in the pediatric patient. In up to 39% of proximal radius fractures, there is a concomitant fracture, which can easily be overlooked on the initial standard radiographs. The treatment options for proximal radius fractures in children range from non-surgical treatment, such as immobilization alone and closed reduction followed by immobilization, to more invasive options, including closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and open reduction with internal fixation. The choice of treatment depends on the degree of angulation and displacement of the fracture and the age of the patient; an angulation of less than 30 degrees and translation of less than 50% is generally accepted, whereas a higher degree of displacement is considered an indication for surgical intervention. Fractures with limited displacement and non-surgical treatment generally result in superior outcomes in terms of patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion and complications compared to severely displaced fractures requiring surgical intervention. With proper management, good to excellent results are achieved in most cases, and long-term sequelae are rare. However, severe complications do occur, including radio-ulnar synostosis, osteonecrosis, rotational impairment, and premature physeal closure with a malformation of the radial head as a result, especially after more invasive procedures. Adequate follow-up is therefore warranted.

Epidemiology and Forensic Implications of Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for 7% of all fractures and 80% of humerus fractures, with a higher incidence in women. Among patients aged 65 years and older, proximal humeral fractures are the second most frequent upper extremity fractures and the third most frequent osteoporotic fractures, after proximal femur and distal radius fractures. Studies show that the incidence of proximal humeral fractures increases by approximately 40% every five years. In the United States, an estimated 275,000 patients will present to the emergency department with his proximal humeral level fracture by 2030. Fractures of the proximal humerus increase the risk of subsequent fractures of the proximal femur and distal forearm. The risk of fracture at the proximal femoral level following a fracture of the proximal humerus was 16%, the same as that following a fracture of the distal radius. <br />The forensic implications are important in evaluating the number of days of medical care especially in malpraxis cases. Incorrect treatment of the humeral fractures may lead to an important increase of the time of recovery and as a consequence complex medico-legal implications.

Elbow Dislocation with Irretrievable Rotating‐Rope Injury of the Forearm: Case Report and Literature Review

BackgroundSimultaneous dislocation of the elbow, radioulnar joint and proximal radius fracture with rotary noose injury to the medial ulna tubercle is extremely rare. An emergency surgery was performed to reduce it. The radial head with the backbone was reset after two hammers were fixed, then the radial capitulum safety was fixed with a locking plate. After the ulnar instability was examined, two Kirschner wires were drilled percutaneously to fix the elbow flexion at 100° under closed reduction, and two Kirschner wires were drilled percutaneously to fix the ulnar joint. Good follow‐up results were achieved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on this particular type of injury and on this approach to treating this type of injury.Case presentationWe report the case of a 36‐year‐old male, who extended and landed on his left hand to protect his child in right arm before felling, resulting in severe pain and deformity of his left elbow and wrist and loss of movement in these joints. X‐ray examination found proximal distal radioulnar joints, a proximal radial fracture and a dislocation bowstring in the ulna nodule. For a timely diagnosis in an emergency open reduction situation, accurate judgment of this injury is highly important. After 12 months of postoperative follow‐up, the patient was symptom‐free, and radiographs showed fracture healing.ConclusionWe performed emergency reduction and internal fixation of the elbow and successfully saved elbow function, no stability decrease and movement restriction. This case also provides a new reference for the treatment of this type of elbow fracture dislocation.

Fracture of proximal radius combined with dislocation of the radial head: a case report

Fracture of proximal radius combined with dislocation of the radial head: a case report

Wound infection in elbow fractures: Incidence and new management protocol.

Wound infection in elbow fractures: Incidence and new management protocol.

Epidemiological Evaluation of Pediatric Elbow Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Single Center

Abstract Introduction Elbow fractures are the commonest fractures in the pediatric age group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiology of fresh and neglected pediatric elbow fractures in a hilly state of India with a limited health care facility. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective observational single-center study conducted between January 2019 and January 2021. Results Supracondylar was the most common fracture in 58.7% of patients followed by lateral condyle and proximal radius fracture. The highest number of fractures were reported in the age group of 5 to 8 years. In addition, 19% of patients presented with associated complications, 8% of patients had combination injuries of the ipsilateral upper limb, 16% of patients presented to the hospital 1 week after the trauma, 48% of patients had the first contact with a bonesetter/native practitioner. Conclusion Supracondylar fracture was the most common elbow fracture followed by lateral condyle. The most common involved age group was 5 to 8 years. A significant number of elbow fractures are mismanaged by native practitioners in rural India.

Surgical treatment strategies and their radiological potential for correction of proximal radius fractures in children and adolescents

The isolated proximal radius fracture in children is a quite rare injury. In difference to adults a conservative treatment is often possible. But in case of increasing dislocation the indication for surgery is given. Options for an operative treatment are "closed reduction", "percutaneous reduction", "intramedullary nailing", "open reduction" with and without fixation. Aim of this study is to compare these procedures with each other. This was aretrospective investigation and 82patients who underwent surgery after an isolated proximal radius fracture were included. Fracture types were classified according to the AO (working group for osteosynthesis questions)/OTA (Orthopedic Trauma Association) classification. The preoperative and postoperative degrees of axis deviation were compared and were considered to be a measure of the quality of treatment. The lowest degree of axis deviation resulted by open reduction and implantation of K‑wires (15,8°) and implantation of headless compression screws (HCS, 16°). Closed reduction without any fixation resulted in 19°, with implantation of an TEN (titan elastic nail) in 20° and the open reduction without any fixation resulted in 21° of axis deviation. No correlation was observed concerning the fracture type and the postoperative axis deviation. The study shows that the postoperative result does not depend on the fracture type (according to the AO/OTA classification) but on the surgical procedure. Despite the good radiological results in open reduction and internal fixation this procedure should be reserved for difficult situations in which less invasive surgical procedures fail, to avoid aseptic bone necrosis.

Pediatric Proximal Radius Fracture and Reduction Techniques: An Educational Review

The article's abstract is not available.

The Benefits and Harms of Early Mobilization and Supervised Exercise Therapy after Non-surgically Treated Proximal Humerus or Distal Radius fracture: A systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Fractures of the proximal humerus (PHF) and distal radius (DRF) are among the most common upper extremity fractures in the elderly. Recent randomized controlled trials support non-surgical treatment. Evidence behind the best non-surgical treatment strategy has been sparse and raises questions as to when and how to initiate exercises. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the benefits and harms of early mobilization versus late mobilization and supervised versus non-supervised exercises therapy after PHF and DRF. 15 published and 5 unpublished trials were included. Early mobilization after PHF resulted in better function with a mean difference (MD) of 4.55 (95% CI 0.00-9.10) on the Constant Shoulder Score. However, the MD was not found to be clinically relevant. No clear evidence showed that early mobilization after PHF had a positive effect on range of motion or pain. Neither did it lead to more complications. Furthermore, no eligible evidence was found supporting early mobilization to be superior to late mobilization after DRF, or that supervised exercise therapy was superior to non-supervised exercise therapy after PHF and DRF. The quality of evidence on all outcomes was found to be low or very low. Early mobilization after PHF may have a beneficial effect on function. Due to the lack of clear evidence, there is an urgent need for future studies to determine the effect of early mobilization and supervised exercise therapy after PHF and DRF. Prospero ID number: CRD42020167656, date of registration 28.04.2020.

Internal Radioulnar Fixation for Treatment of Nonunion of Proximal Radius and Ulna Fractures in a Toy Breed Dog

AbstractIn this case report, we describe an alternative surgical procedure to treat proximal radius and ulnar nonunion in a toy breed dog. A 14-month-old, Maltese cross-breed dog was referred after previous treatment with external and internal fixation had failed, resulting in a nonunion of a fracture of the proximal radius and ulna with the proximal radius fragment too small and friable to be used for fixation. A craniomedial approach was made to debride the radius nonunion site and a second approach to the lateral aspect of the ulna was made. The fracture was realigned and a titanium locking plate was applied in bridging fashion, fixed to the proximal ulnar fragment with three locking screws in the most proximal plate holes, a fourth screw was inserted in the mid-shaft of the distal ulnar fragment and three locking screws were inserted in the distal most holes of the plate through the distal ulna to engage the distal radial fragment. A recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 graft was inserted into the radius and ulna fracture sites. The dog had a successful clinical and radiographic outcome with bridging of the defect 4 weeks postoperatively and complete callus formation 8 weeks postoperatively. Implants have undergone dynamization and then removal. Use of a locking plate as an internal fixator achieving fixation of the proximal ulna and distal radius can be considered an option for the treatment of proximal radioulnar nonunions with a small proximal radial fragment.