Proximal Femoral Resection Research Articles

A survey to determine the zone of equipoise for the Proximal FEmur Resection or Internal Fixation fOR Metastases (PERFORM) randomized controlled trial.

The objective of this study was to establish a zone of clinical equipoise for the Proximal FEmur Resection or Internal Fixation fOR Metastases (PERFORM) randomized controlled trial, which will compare resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction to internal fixation for skeletal metastases of the proximal femur. A survey was developed, piloted, and distributed to self-declared interested stakeholders in the PERFORM trial. The survey targeted orthopedic oncologists and was designed to assess patient and bone lesion characteristics that drive surgical decision-making in the treatment of skeletal metastases in the proximal femur. An Ethics Waiver was obtained at the lead academic institution and data was collected in the REDCap survey database. Responses were complete from 76 surgeons across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Response rate from self-declared interested stakeholders was 70%, with additional responses collected from a broader international audience. Responses indicate that a study population for which either resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction or internal fixation are acceptable options include (1) life expectancy at least 6months, (2) bone loss of no more than 75% and no less than 25%, and (3) minimal to moderate risk for perioperative complications. Ninety-three percent of respondents indicated that they would be interested in participating in the PERFORM trial. A preliminary zone of equipoise for the PERFORM trial includes patients with 25-75% bone loss, low to moderate risk of operative complications, and life expectancy of at least 6months. Further stakeholder discussions have finalized the PERFORM trial protocol prior to study initiation.

Allograft-prosthesis composite after proximal femur bone tumor resection in pediatric age: Is it effective in preserving bone stock?

The purpose of the study was to answer the following questions. What was functional results of pediatric patients receiving a short stem allograft-prosthesis composite of the proximal femur? What was complication rate and revision-free implant survival? Was it possible to preserve the bone stock of the proximal femur in pediatric patients? We reviewed 10 pediatric patients treated with proximal femur resection for a primary bone tumor and reconstruction with short stem allograft-prosthesis composite, with at least 24 months follow-up. The median age was 9 years (4-13) at surgery. The mean resection length was 15 cm (6-29). In six cases, fixation was performed with a short plate positioned under the great trochanter while in four cases a long plate extended over the great trochanter was employed. Nine complications that required surgical revision were assessed in six patients (one wound dehiscence, two nonunions, two fractures, one acetabular wear, three hypometria), while allograft-prosthesis composite removal was required in three patients. The revision-free survival was 57% (95% confidence interval 33%-100%) at 5 and 10 years. The graft removal-free survival was 75% (95% confidence interval 50%-100%) at 5 and 10 years. The mean Musculo-Skeletal Tumor Society Score was 28 (20-30). Allograft-prosthesis composites with short stem and compression plate represents an effective reconstructive option after proximal femur resection for primary bone tumors in growing patients, preserving bone stock. The use of a compression plate extended over the greater trochanter seemed to reduce failure rate.

SHORTENING OSTEOTOMIES OF THE FEMUR DURING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR DEVELOPMENTAL HIP DYSPLASIA

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for congenital hip dysplasia (CDH) presents a challenge. In high-grade CDH, key surgical targets include cup placement in the anatomical position and leg length equality. Lengthening of more than 4 cm is associated with sciatic nerve injury, therefore shortening osteotomies are necessary. We present our experience of different shortening osteotomies including advantages and disadvantages of each technique.89 hips, in 61 pts (28 bilateral cases), for high CDH were performed by a single surgeon from 1997 to 2022. 67 patients were female and 22 were male. Age ranged from 38 to 68 yrs. In all patients 5–8cm of leg length discrepancy (LLD) was present, requiring shortening femoral osteotomy. 12 patients underwent sequential proximal femoral resection with trochanteric osteotomy, 46 subtrochanteric, 6 midshaft, and 25 distal femoral osteotomies with simultaneous valgus correction were performed. All acetabular prostheses were placed in the true anatomical position. We used uncemented high porosity cups. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months.All osteotomies healed uneventfully except 3 non-unions of the greater trochanter in the proximal femur resection group. No femoral shaft fractures in proximally based osteotomies. No significant LLD compared to the unaffected or reconstructed side. 2 patients suffered 3 and 5 degrees malrotation of the femur in the oblique sub-trochanteric group. 3 patients suffered transient sciatic nerve palsies.Shortening femoral osteotomies in the treatment of DDH are necessary to avoid injury to the sciatic nerve. In our series, we found transverse subtrochanteric osteotomies to be the most technically efficient, versatile and predictable in their clinical outcome, due to the ability to correct rotation and preserve the metaphyseal bone integrity, allowing for better initial stem stability. Distal femoral osteotomies allowed for controllable correction of valgus knee deformity.

Preoperative Albumin and Postoperative CRP/Albumin Ratio (CARS) are Independent Predictive Factors in Estimating 1-Year Mortality in Patients Operated for Proximal Femoral Metastasis with Endoprosthesis.

Proximal femur resection and prosthetic reconstruction are preferred in patients with extensive bone destruction, pathological fractures, tumours resistant to radiation therapy, and patients with more proximal metastatic lesions.There is increasing evidence that the CRP/albumin ratio (CAR) is an independent marker of inflammation in various primary organ cancers and maybe a more accurate prognostic factor.We aimed to evaluate whether preoperative and postoperative CAR values could be a factor in predicting mortality in these patients. We hypothesized that CAR could predict these patients' postoperative 90-day and 1-year mortality. The patient's age and gender, primary tumour, number of bone metastases, and presence of visceral metastases were recorded using imaging techniques such as computed tomography and bone scan or positron emission tomography.The following laboratory data were analyzed before and after surgery. The mean age of the patients was 62.67 ± 14.8; 56.9% were female (n:29), and 43.1% were male (n:22). When the results of the ROC analysis of the parameters in predicting 1-year mortality were examined, and the cut-off value for preoperative albumin was taken as ≤ 3.75, the AUC value was found to be statistically significant as 0.745 (p:0.003).When the cut-off value for postoperative CAR was taken as ≥ 87.32, the AUC value was found to be 0.7 statistically significant (p:0.015). Length of stay, preoperative albumin and postoperative CAR values can be used as independent predictive values in predicting 1-year mortality in patients undergoing endoprosthesis due to proximal femur metastasis.

Combining Shelf Osteotomy With Proximal Femoral Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection

Introduction: Oncologic proximal femoral resection and reconstruction in skeletally immature children remains a formidable task due to the risk of developing hip instability with patient growth or interval leg lengthening through the prosthesis. Shelf pelvic osteotomy increases femoral head coverage and containment, and favorable long-term results have been reported in the setting of developmental dysplasia of the hip and Perthes disease. We present a technique of combining shelf osteotomy with expandable proximal femoral endoprosthesis reconstruction in pediatric limb-sparing surgery. Materials and Methods: Four surgeons at 2 centers from 2012 to 2020 performed proximal femoral reconstruction with shelf osteotomy. Data were collected retrospectively on operative technique, radiographic measurements, and complications including dislocation, subluxation, implant loosening, pain, function, and radiographic outcomes. Results: Five patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 49 months (range: 17 to 104 mo). The mean lateral center edge angle status postproximal femoral resection and reconstruction shelf osteotomy was 56.1 degrees (±30.5). There were no reported incidences of subluxations, dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, or soft tissue complications. The 3 patients with the longest follow-up at 3, 5, and 8 years tolerated serial lengthening of the endoprosthesis totaling 1 cm, 7.25 cm, and 9 cm, respectively, and demonstrated earlier triradiate cartilage closure in the operative side compared with the nonoperative side. All patients have returned to independent ambulation. Discussion: Combining proximal femoral reconstruction with shelf osteotomy in limb salvage pediatric orthopedic oncology may help to improve hip stability with serial lengthening and patient growth.

Unexpected Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor of the Femoral Head.

Osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) is clinically common and easily diagnosed via imaging examination, especially when there is a definite cause, such as a fracture, long-term hormonotherapy, etc. However, some rare neoplastic lesions of the femoral head can mimic its image performance in some situations, leading to misdiagnosis. We present the case of a 57-year-old male with bone pain in the left hip joint that persisted for 2 years. CT and MRI images were performed and both were suggestive of ONFH. Unexpectedly, the histopathologic results of left proximal femur resection revealed the diagnosis of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT), a rare mesenchymal tumor. His hip pain was obviously relieved after surgery, and the course of 1-year follow-up was uneventful.

Resection and reconstruction of the proximal femur with revision stems: a cost-effective alternative.

Modular oncologic megaprosthesis is the standard method for reconstruction after resection of tumors of the proximal femur. These implants have been utilized for either primary tumors or metastatic disease of bone and multiple myeloma. Fixation is based on either cemented or cementless stems, and a collar supporting the body of the prosthesis. For those patients with advanced disease and/or limited life span, a judicious approach should balance the functional expectations, prognosis, and the issue of cost of the surgical procedure and the implant that is selected. Based on the principles of distal fixation of tapered stems, the authors have utilized implants originally designed for hip revision surgery to reconstruct the proximal femur in 19 patients, after resection because of metastases, multiple myeloma and some aggressive primary tumors. The essentials of the technique consist of distal fixation in the remaining isthmus of the femur by means of tapered stems, impacted in such a way to achieve solid primary fixation, balanced with accurate leg length restoration. Proximally, the implant remains devoid of bone coverage. In this retrospective study, proper distal fixation, leaving the proximal part of the implant uncovered with bone, has resulted in good functional results in mid-term follow-up of patients. Primary fixation has led to secondary bone ongrowth and remodeling, providing secondary fixation. Complications such as instability, loosening and infection are comparable with those associated to the traditional management with mega prosthesis. The utilization of tapered stems for distal fixation after proximal femoral resections has shown reliable results after mid-term follow-up. The method might be considered as a cost-effective alternative for selected patients.

Developmental disorders of the hip treated at the Clinic for Orthopaedic Diseases – in a period of 10 years (2009-2018)

Developmental hip dysplasia includes a wide range of conditions such as subluxation, dislocation, hip instability, and teratological hip. The diagnosis was confirmed by clinical examination, ultrasound examination and anterior-posterior view radiograph (AP). Treatment varied depending on the patient's age and the degree of dysplasia: Pavlik harness, closed reduction, open reduction and corrective osteotomies. In this study 242 patients were included, of whom 198 were female patients and 44 male. All of the patients were treated with conservative treatment- closed reducation and spica casting. Left-sided dislocations were more common than right sided dislocations with predominance in the female patients. The main treatment in follow-up patients was closed reduction with or without adductor muscle tenotomy (m. add. longus). In cases with unsuccessful attempt of closed reduction, open reduction was performed with or without adductor muscle tenotomy. Depending on the residual dysplasia, patients were additionally treated with pelvic osteotomies (Salter 's inominate osteotomy), varus derotation osteotomy, valgus osteotomy, proximal femoral resection, and trochanter major transposition. 167 patients were treated with closed reduction and 3 with open reduction. The remaining patients were treated with closed reduction and additional surgery or with open reduction and additional surgery. Out of all treated patients, only 10 patients had recurrent dislocation of the hip, 7 female and 3 male patients. Closed reduction was performed again on two patients, and open reduction of the hip was performed on one patient. The average age of patients was 21.5 months. By presenting the cases in a period of 10 years, it was conclud that most cases were diagnosed later. Also, the standard closed reduction treatment was successful even after the first year in said patients. Depending on the residual dysplasia of the hip, in order to achieve better congruence of the joint, additional surgeries were performed.

Proximal femur versus acetabular extra-articular resection of the hip joint for primary malignant bone tumors: a retrospective comparative review of 33 cases

IntroductionExtra-articular resection (EAR) of the hip joint is prone to significant complications and morbidity. Thus, this study evaluates the cumulative incidences and main reasons of reoperation following EAR of primary malignant bone tumors (PMBT) of the hip to determine whether the outcomes are different between EAR of the pelvis and that of the proximal femur.Patients and methodsThirty-three patients presented with a PMBT of the proximal femur or pelvis were included in this study. Among all PMBTs, 58% originated from the pelvis and 42% were from the proximal femur. Twenty patients had chondrosarcomas (61%), 10 had osteosarcomas (30%), and 3 had sarcomas of another histological subtype (9%).ResultsThe mean follow-up was of 76 months (range: 24–220 months). The cumulative probabilities of revision for any reason were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30–70%) 5 years after surgery. The 5-year cumulative probabilities of revision were 13% (95% CI 4–27%), 24% (95% CI 10–42%), and 34% (95% CI 14–56%) for mechanical, infectious, and tumoral reasons, respectively. The 5-year cumulative probabilities of revision for any reason were 78% (95% CI 37–94%) and 14% (95% CI 2–38%) for the pelvis and proximal femur, respectively (p = 0.004). Posterior column preservation was significantly associated with more mechanical complications even after adjusting for the resection site (p = 0.043).ConclusionHalf of patients undergoing EAR of the hip joint for PMBT of the proximal femur or acetabulum will require another operation. EAR of the pelvis is associated with significantly worse outcome than EAR of the proximal femur.

Internal Hemipelvectomy through a Periacetabular Osteotomy Combined with an Extraarticular (Proximal) Femur Resection using A Single Posterolateral approach; The Surgical Technique

Internal Hemipelvectomy through a Periacetabular Osteotomy Combined with an Extraarticular (Proximal) Femur Resection using A Single Posterolateral approach; The Surgical Technique

Resection of the proximal femur during one-stage revision for infected hip arthroplasty : risk factors and effectiveness.

One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions. In this single-centre, case-control study, 57 patients who underwent one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip and required resection of the proximal femur between 2009 and 2018 were identified. The control group consisted of 57 patients undergoing one-stage revision without bony resection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any correlation with resection and the risk factors for re-revisions. Rates of all-causes re-revision, reinfection, and instability were compared between groups. Patients who required resection of the proximal femur were found to have a higher all-cause re-revision rate (29.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.018), largely due to reinfection (15.8% vs 0%; p = 0.003), and dislocation (8.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.762), and showed higher rate of in-hospital wound haematoma requiring aspiration or evacuation (p = 0.013), and wound revision (p = 0.008). The use of of dual mobility components/constrained liner in the resection group was higher than that of controls (94.7% vs 36.8%; p < 0.001). The presence and removal of additional metal hardware (odds ratio (OR) = 7.2), a sinus tract (OR 4), ten years' time interval between primary implantation and index infection (OR 3.3), and previous hip revision (OR 1.4) increased the risk of proximal femoral resection. A sinus tract (OR 9.2) and postoperative dislocation (OR 281.4) were associated with increased risk of subsequent re-revisions. Proximal femoral resection during one-stage revision hip arthroplasty for PJI may be required to reduce the risk of of recurrent or further infection. Patients with additional metalware needing removal or transcortical sinus tracts and chronic osteomyelitis are particularly at higher risk of needing proximal femoral excision. However, radical resection is associated with higher surgical complications and increased re-revision rates. The use of constrained acetabular liners and dual mobility components maintained an acceptable dislocation rate. These results, including identified risk factors, may aid in preoperative planning, patient consultation and consent, and intraoperative decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(11):1678-1685.

The Wagner Modular (S2) Prosthesis for Proximal Femur Bone Loss ; Prospective Study of 19 Cases

Background: Wagner proximal femur prosthesis is the versatile modular implant. Study Design: Prospective study Setting: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Dow University of Health Sciences / Civil Hospital Karachi, from January 2013 to December 2019. Methodology: Total 19 patients of both genders with proximal femur bone loss due to tumor, implant failure for proximal femur fixation, comminuted intertrochanteric fracture, and failed arthroplasty included in the study. After taking written informed consent, detailed demographics including age, gender, indication of wagner prosthesis, and wagner stem type were recorded. Among all the patients 11 patients received total hip replacement and 8 patients received bipolar. Complications associated with procedure were recorded. Outcomes were assessed by Merle D Aubgine scale. Results: Total 19 patients were included in the study who were operated with wagner prosthesis for proximal femur bone deficit problems. 7 (37%) patients were male and 12 (67%) were female , between age of 16 to 70. 13 (68%) patient have proximal femur problem on right side and 6(32%) patient on left side .10 Patient have proximal femur fixation problems and 9 with proximal femur tumor. Modular wagner prosthesis used in all patients . Per-operative one (5%) patient have perforation of cortex and One (5%)patient posterior hip dislocation on next day . Two (11%) patient had per-operative fracture . Maximum follow-up is from 6.3 years to minimum 6 months. One patient with metastasis died within four weeks of surgery. Outcome measured with modified Merle D Aubgine scale showed no excellent , good in 15(79%) , fair 3 (16%), poor 1(5%). Conclusion: Wagner proximal femur modular implant is a versatile implant for proximal femur fixation failure and after proximal femur resection in tumor patients. It is modular with variable options to make stable hip joint. It is cheap as comparative to proximal femur replacement implant for tumor. Keywords: Implant failure, Proximal femur, Tumor, Wagner implant.

Endoprosthetic Proximal Femoral Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Proximal Femoral Resections in Young Adults

Abstract Background Metastatic tumors are the most common malignant lesion of the proximal femur, with carcinomas being the most frequent. The proximal femur and midfemur are common sites for primary bone sarcomas; approximately16% of Ewing's sarcomas, 13% chondrosarcomas and 10% of osteosarcomas develop at these locations. The major aim in the management of patients who have bone malignancies is prolonging their survival. Primary bone sarcomas that require surgical resection can be treated by either amputation or limb salvage. Most studies which compared both approaches reported that limb salvage had no adverse effect on patients’ survival on long-term. Objective This is a systematic review of literature with meta-analysis study that compare the functional outcomes and complications of the methods; proximal femoral hemi versus total arthroplasty after proximal femur resection followed by endoprosthetic reconstruction and provide recommendations by the best available evidence. Methods We included Randomized control trails (RCTs), including cluster RCTs, controlled (non-randomized) clinical trials or cluster trials, prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies, and case-control or nested case-control studies and controlled clinical trials. We excluded cross-sectional studies, case reports, review articles, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and technique papers. Search results conducted to systematic review management software and manually screened for eligibility were included. Critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the search results based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results Twenty-three studies are included. Quality appraisal demonstrated that all but one study is retrospective. The pooled results from the meta-analysis showed that the rate of aseptic loosening was only 2% when reconstruction occurs with endoprosthetic proximal femoral hemiarthroplasty. There was unimportant heterogeneity in the included studies. The rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is 4.6% to 8% of oncological patients. The rate of periprosthetic fracture was only 1% Conclusion Proximal femoral endoprosthesis has definitive benefits in the treatment of primary or metastatic tumors affecting the proximal femur. The implants tend to improve the function and quality of life of patients with metastatic disease and high-grade localized disease. It also provides them with a relatively pain-free limb with good functional capacity. With continuing advances in the surgical and oncological fields, there is a great potential for curative limb salvage surgery in the long term. Reconstruction with endoprosthetic Proximal femoral hemiarthroplasty after proximal femoral resection in young adults can confer additional stability with a reduced dislocation rates and systemic complications as compared to total hip arthroplasty.

A new technique for proximal femoral resection in non-ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy

Proximal femoral resection may be proposed to non-ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy and chronic painful hip dislocation. McCarthy's technique confers good results but does not solve the problems related to femoral reascension (bone migration causing painful osseous or cutaneous conflict). We describe a new technique of resection-interposition of the proximal end of the femur which preserves the greater trochanter by an orthogonal osteotomy below the lesser trochanter while maintaining the gluteal-vastus lateralis strut in continuity. A suture of the remaining joint capsule upon itself and a trans-trochanteric capsulodesis are associated to stabilize the cephalic displacement of the femur.

Clinical outcomes of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral resection.

The proximal femur is a common site for primary sarcomas and metastatic lesions. Although the early results of tumor prostheses are promising, the long-term results of reconstruction are unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting prosthesis survival and complications after proximal femoral resection and reconstruction. We reviewed the results of 68 patients who underwent proximal femoral resection and reconstruction with a modular bipolar-type tumor prosthesis between 2005 and 2017. The mean follow-up was 55.6months (range 6-172months). There were 50 male and 18 female patients with a mean age of 41.5years (range 11-80years). Cumulative survival analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors of prosthesis survival. We also evaluated the complications after operation. Fourteen (21%) patients required further surgery at a mean 37months post-operatively (range 5-125months). There were three cases of infection (4%), six of local recurrence (9%), three of acetabular erosion (4%) and two of stem loosening (3%). The implant survival rates were 83.9% at 5years and 59.8% at 10years. Prosthesis survivals did not differ based on fixation method (P=0.085), age (P=0.329) or resection length (P=0.61). Acetabular chondrolysis was identified in 18 (26%) patients and longer resection length (≥20cm) showed a trend for risk of acetabular wear (P=0.132). The results of proximal femoral resection and reconstruction with a modular bipolar-type prosthesis were found to be acceptable with infection and local recurrence as short-term complications and loosening and acetabular erosion as long-term complications.

Oncological and Functional Outcomes in Joint-sparing Resections of the Proximal Femur for Malignant Primary Bone Tumors.

Joint-sparing resections (JSR) of the proximal femur allow for preservation of the proximal femoral growth plate and native hip joint, but whether this offers fewer complications or better function and longevity of the reconstruction remains unknown. In this study, we compared the functional outcomes of pediatric patients with bone sarcomas undergoing JSR of the proximal femur with intercalary allograft (ICA) reconstruction to those undergoing proximal femoral resections (PFR) with allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) reconstructions. We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing JSR with ICA reconstruction and PFR with APC reconstructions between 1995 and 2013 at a tertiary pediatric referral center. Primary outcomes included major and minor complications and secondary outcomes included the need for a secondary procedure, presence of local or distant relapse, survival status, and the presence of pain and ambulatory status (limp, assistive device, highest level of function). We assessed differences in outcomes using the Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Eight patients underwent a JSR and ICA reconstruction, while 7 patients underwent a PFR with APC reconstruction. Median patient follow-up was 60.4 months (interquartile range: 36.8 to 112.9) Patients undergoing JSR and ICA reconstruction were younger than patients undergoing PFR with APC reconstruction (7.7 vs. 11.7 y, P=0.043); however, we found no other statistically significant differences in patient demographics. There were no statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between the study groups; however, patients who underwent JSR with ICA had more major complications (62.5% vs. 42.9%, P=0.29) and a lower rate of minor complications (25% vs. 28.6%, P=0.22). Treatment of proximal femoral bone sarcomas in pediatric and adolescent patients remains a challenging enterprise. JSR with ICA reconstruction in the proximal femur, when feasible, may provide a similar function and risk of intermediate-term major and minor complications when compared with PFR with APC reconstruction. Further long-term studies are required to determine the impact of the native femoral head retention with respect to revision rates. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Is bipolar hemiarthroplasty an appropriate type of hip articulation following proximal femoral or total femoral resections for musculoskeletal malignancies?

Different approaches are applied for reconstruction in patients with a musculoskeletal malignancy which require a proximal femoral or total femoral resection. We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients who underwent a proximal femoral or total femoral resection due to bone and soft tissue tumors and had an endoprosthetic reconstruction by a bipolar hemiarthroplasty type of hip articulation. We retrospectively identified 133 patients who underwent a proximal femoral or total femoral endoprosthetic replacement after resection of a bone or soft tissue malignancy. There were 74 male and 59 female patients, with a mean age of 55.02 ± 16.92years (range 11-84years) and a median follow-up of 24.47 ± 24.45months (range 6-164months). Patient demographics, surgical, and oncological data were recorded. Acetabular wear was measured using the classification proposed by Baker. Functional assessment was performed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score. There was no statistically significant difference among primary diagnostic groups in terms of gender, prosthesis type, trochanter major resection, local recurrence, complication/revision rate, and MSTS Score (p > 0.05, for each parameter). On the other hand, a statistically significant difference was detected in terms of degree of acetabular erosion among diagnostic groups (p < 0.001); the acetabular erosion rate (AER) was found to be lower in patients with metastatic carcinoma than in patients with a diagnosis of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma. The univariable analysis revealed that the effect of age, primary diagnosis, localization, follow-up time, and presence and number of distant organ metastasis variables on AER were found to be statistically significant (p = 0.018, p = 0.035, p = 0.002, p = 0.007, p = 0.031, p = 0.040, respectively). In patients who undergo a proximal femoral or a total femoral resection due to a musculoskeletal tumor, bipolar hemiarthroplasty is an adequate type of hip articulation method, since it does not affect the revision requirements and functional outcomes of patients with acetabular erosion.

Is osseous reattachment of the greater trochanter necessary compared to soft-tissue-only abductor repair in proximal femoral megaprosthesis reconstruction?

One of the challenges to surgical reconstruction following oncologic proximal femur resection is reliable re-establishment of the abductor mechanism. Surgical and functional outcomes following re-approximation of the abductor mechanism to a metallic endoprosthetic after tumor resection of the proximal femur have not been well established in the literature. A retrospective review was performed, inclusive of patients who received a proximal femur replacement with a metallic endoprosthesis following tumor resection. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) those that received an abductor repair involving a trochanteric osteotomy and osseous fixation of the greater trochanter/abductor mechanism to the endoprosthesis, and (2) those that did not have a trochanteric osteotomy and therefore had an abductor repair consisting of only soft tissue reattachment to the endoprosthesis. The two groups were assessed for demographic characteristics, diagnosis, surgical outcomes including rates of complication and failure, radiographic evidence of trochanteric failure, and functional outcomes. Descriptive statistics, comparative statistics, and logistic regression analyses were performed to discern differences between the two study groups. Fifty-three patients were included in the analysis, 29 had abductor reconstructions involving reattachment of the greater trochanter to the metallic endoprosthesis and 24 had soft tissue reconstruction of the abductor mechanism without bony fixation. There were no differences between the two groups for demographic data, cancer diagnosis, follow up, or survivorship. Radiographic evidence of trochanteric dissociation from the endoprosthesis was observed in 45% of osteotomy cases. Only 10% of patients in the trochanter osteotomy group and 38% of the soft tissue only group were able to resume a normal, non-Trendelenburg gait at final postoperative visit (p = .024). Need for an assistive ambulatory device was seen in 83% and 67% of the osteotomy and soft-tissue-only patients, respectively (p = .21). Re-establishing the abductor mechanism following proximal femur oncologic resection remains a challenge to orthopedic oncologists. Even when possible, salvage of the greater trochanter for reattachment to the endoprosthesis did not lead to improved function in this series, when compared to a similar cohort that received a soft-tissue-only abductor repair. Abductor mechanism reconstruction with a greater trochanteric osteotomy and subsequent fixation to the proximal femur endoprosthesis had a high rate of radiographic failure. Additionally, reattachment of the greater trochanter to the proximal femur endoprosthesis demonstrated no improvement in Trendelenburg gait or reliance on an assistive ambulatory device when compared to a soft-tissue-only abductor repair.

The proximal vastus lateralis flap: An anatomical and radiological study

Soft-tissue reconstruction following acetabular or proximal femur resection for bone tumors is challenging. The vastus lateralis flap has been proposed as an advancement or rotational flap to cover soft-tissue defects for such locoregional indications. We performed an anatomical and a radiological study to assess the vascularization of the proximal vastus lateralis muscle achieved through the transverse branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery in order to decrease the morbidity of the classical flap retrieval technique. Five fresh adult cadavers were dissected bilaterally. Each vastus lateralis dissection was prealably injected with contrast-media agent through the lateral circumflex artery and CT scan images was recorded. A descriptive and an analytical study were carried out. The median length and width of the entire muscle were 31.2cm (Q1-Q3: 29.7-33.3) and 12.7cm (Q1-Q3: 7.0-14.9), respectively; the median surface area of the entire vastus lateralis muscle was 282cm2 (Q1-Q3: 172.6-455.6) cm2. The median length and width of the perfused area were 13.3cm (Q1-Q3: 12.3-16.6) and 9.4cm (Q1-Q3: 6.9-8.8) cm, respectively; the median surface of the perfused area was 89.4cm2 (Q1-Q3: 67.4-110.5) cm2. The mean length of the pedicle measured on the CT scan was 6.3cm (95% CI: 5.5-7.1). The proximal vastus lateralis flap as a pedicled muscular flap supplied by the transverse branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery is a muscular flap that can be used by reconstructive and orthopaedic surgeons to repair soft-tissue defects around the hip joint without undue damage to the functional apparatus of the knee.

Parents and Caregivers Satisfaction After Palliative Treatment of Spastic Hip Dislocation in Cerebral Palsy.

Objectives: Pain appearance is one the most common complication of spastic hip disease in children with cerebral palsy (CP). It determines child and caregiver quality of life and life priorities. Reconstruction hip surgery should be considered as a treatment of choice. Some clinical conditions give the inability to perform such a procedure. In our paper, we would like to present four palliative methods of spastic hip dislocation treatment in children with CP.Material: We analyzed four groups of patients treated because of hip pain. Inclusion criteria were pain appearance (visual analog scale-11 or numeric rating scale-11) and hip joint dislocation (migration percentage >80%). All patients were admitted to our department between 2008 and 2018. In the first group, patients were treated only by steroid injections to hip joints; in the second group, patients were recruits after hip interposition arthroplasty with shoulder spacer; in the third group, they were patients after valgus subtrochanteric osteotomy (Schanz); and in the fourth group, these were patients after proximal femoral resection (Castle procedure). The minimal follow-up time was 2 years. The first group consisted of 15 patients (15 hips) with a mean age of 15.5 (8–17) years; the second group, 20 patients (24 hips) with a mean age of 14.2 (9–22.6) years; the third group, 22 patients (24 hips) with a mean age of 13.5 (7–20.5) years; and the fourth group, 10 patients (15 hips) with a mean age of 12.9 (7–17.6) years.Methods: Radiological evaluation was based on a standardized anteroposterior X-ray of the hip joints. Pain severity before surgery and at the last follow-up time was measured by visual analog scale-11. Parents or caregivers were asked about their child's pain during sitting, perineal care, and rest. During the visit, all caregivers were asked about treatment satisfaction (no 0 to max 10) and if they would decide again for the same surgery.Results: In all groups of patients, we observed a decrease in pain complaints. The observed reduction of pain in the first group was from 7.88 (4–10) to 3.08 (0–8) (p = 0.05), but results of injection were observed only for 4 months (2–8), and it has to be repeated (average: two times). In the second group, level of pain was reduced from 4.93 (1–10) to 0.93 (0–5) (p < 0.001); in the third group, from 6.22 (3–10) to 0.59 (0–6) (p < 0.001); and in the fourth group, pain reduces from 5.43 (2–10) to 2.13 (0–5) (p < 0.001). Observed changes concerned mostly sitting position and perineal care. The complication rate was in the second group, 6 of 24 cases of extraarticular ossification; in the third group, 2 of 24 cases with extraarticular ossification, two cases of revision surgery. In the fourth group, two cases needed another femoral resection. In the first group, five patients died during follow-up time, so they were excluded from the study. In the steroid injection group, parents' treatment evaluation was 6.83 (0–10), and only in three cases that they would resign from the treatment. In the hip interposition arthroplasty group, caregivers' evaluation was 7.41 (0–10), and in five cases, parents did not accept the surgery. In the Schanz osteotomy group, parents' evaluation was 5.9 (0–10), and in eight cases, caregivers would not repeat surgery. In the proximal femoral resection group, satisfaction was the highest, 8.3 (3–10), and only two parents would not decide for surgery again.Conclusion: All procedures can be considered as palliative treatment options for pain complain in a spastic hip joint dislocation in children with CP. Steroid injections to the hip joint need to be repeated, and with the follow-up time, it becomes less effective. Steroid injection seems to be the treatment of choice for patients with general anesthesia contraindications. Interposition arthroplasty of the hip joint seems to give better final results, but the highest parents' satisfaction surprisingly was observed in the proximal femoral resection group, but differences were not statistically significant.