Proximal Diversion Research Articles

Decisions in Diversion: Enterostomy vs. Primary Anastomosis for Colonic Atresia

BackgroundColonic atresia (CA) is associated with Hirschsprung disease (HD) in up to 10% of cases. Therefore, some surgeons elect to complete proximal diversion at the initial operation. We sought to better define the incidence of concurrent HD and evaluate practice patterns regarding diversion for CA. MethodsThe Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was used to identify patients with CA from 2013 to 2022. Patients with small bowel atresia, anorectal malformation, gastroschisis, or first operation after 14 days of age were excluded. Index and subsequent operations were defined. Complications, time to enterostomy closure, and unplanned operations were evaluated. ResultsHD was diagnosed in 8 (9.5%) patients and 7 of these were initially diverted. Diverted and anastomosed patients were demographically similar. In the 58 (69%) patients initially diverted, 19 (33%) had an ileostomy. Continuity was restored with an ileo-colic anastomosis in 63% of diverted and 27% of primarily anastomosed patients. Of those initially managed with a colostomy, 53% ultimately had a colo-colonic anastomosis. Patients with primary anastomoses had fewer operations and received more days of parenteral nutrition. Other outcomes did not vary. ConclusionIn a large population of infants with CA, 9.5% had concurrent HD. Almost 70% of CA patients underwent initial diversion and only one with HD had a primary anastomosis. Patients managed with a primary anastomosis were substantially more likely to retain the proximal colonic segment, but had a similar incidence of complications. When intraoperative colonic biopsies are obtained, primary anastomosis is a safe and effective strategy for CA. Level of Evidence3.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei leading to “jelly belly” abdomen: a case report and review of the literature

BackgroundPseudomyxoma peritonei is an infrequent condition with a global annual incidence of only one to two cases per million people. Mucinous neoplasms, widespread intraperitoneal implants, and mucinous ascites characterize it. Currently, most clinicians misdiagnose this condition, which leads to delayed management.Case presentationA 44-year-old North Indian female presented with a 1.5-month history of an abdominal lump. Physical examination revealed a sizeable abdominopelvic mass at 36 weeks. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a massive multiloculated right ovarian cystic mass measuring 28 × 23 × 13 cm with mild ascites and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels (113.75 ng/ml). A provisional diagnosis of ovarian mucinous neoplasm was made, for which the patient underwent laparotomy. Intraoperatively, there were gross mucinous ascites, along with a large, circumscribed, ruptured right ovarian tumor filled with gelatinous material. The appendicular lump was also filled with mucinous material along with the omentum, ascending colon, right lateral aspect of the rectum, splenic surface, and small bowel mesentery. Cytoreductive surgery was performed along with an oncosurgeon, including total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy, omentectomy, right hemicolectomy, lower anterior resection, ileo-transverse stapled anastomosis with proximal ileal loop diversion stoma, excision of multiple peritoneal gelatinous implants, and peritoneal lavage. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of intestinal-type mucinous carcinoma. Postoperatively, the patient was given six cycles of chemotherapy. She tolerated it without any specific morbidity and had an uneventful recovery. Postoperative follow-up at 15 months revealed normal tumor marker levels and abdominal computed tomography findings and no signs suggestive of local recurrence or distal metastases.ConclusionsPseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease that is frequently misdiagnosed in the preoperative phase. Therefore, radiologists and clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for accurate diagnosis and multidisciplinary management.

Rectovaginal Fistula: What Is the Role of Martius Flap and Gracilis Muscle Interposition in the Therapeutic Strategy?

Although numerous treatments exist for the management of rectovaginal fistula, none has demonstrated its superiority. The role of diverting stoma remains controversial. A few series include Martius flap in the armamentarium. Determine the role of gracilis muscle interposition and Martius flap in the surgical management of rectovaginal fistula. Retrospective cohort study of a pooled prospectively maintained database from 3 centers. All consecutive eligible patients with rectovaginal fistula undergoing Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition were included from 2001 to 2022. Success was defined by the absence of stoma and rectovaginal fistula. Sixty-two patients were included with 55 Martius flap and 24 gracilis muscle interposition performed after failures of 164 initial procedures. Total length of stay was longer for gracilis muscle interposition by 2 days ( p = 0.01) without a significant difference in severe morbidity (20% vs 12%, p = 0.53). Twenty-seven percent of the Martius flap interpositions were performed without a stoma, which did not have an impact on overall morbidity ( p = 0.763). Per patient immediate success rates were not significantly different between groups (35% vs 31%, p > 0.99). The success of gracilis muscle interposition after the failure of the Martius flap was not significantly different from an initial gracilis muscle interposition ( p > 0.99). After simple perineal procedures, the immediate success rate rose to 49.4% (49% vs 50%, p > 0.99). After a median follow-up of 23 months, no significant difference was detected in success rate between the 2 procedures (69% vs 69%, p > 0.99). Smoking was the only negative predictive factor ( p = 0.02). By its retrospective nature, this study is limited in its comparison. This novel comparison between Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition suggests that Martius flap presents several advantages, including shorter length of stay, similar morbidity, and similar success rate. Proximal diversion via a stoma for Martius flap does not appear mandatory. Gracilis muscle interposition could be reserved as a salvage procedure after Martius flap failure. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Si bien existen numerosos tratamientos para el manejo de la fistula rectovaginal, ninguno ha demostrado su superioridad. El papel del estoma de derivación sigue siendo controvertido. Pocas series incluyen colgajo de Martius en el armamento.OBJETIVO:Determinar el rol de la interposición del músculo gracilis y del colgajo de Martius, en el manejo quirúrgico de la fístula rectovaginal.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente en 3 centros.AJUSTES/PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes elegibles consecutivos con fistula rectovaginal sometidos a colgajo de Martius y la interposición del músculo gracilis desde 2001 hasta 2022.RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:El éxito se definió por la ausencia de estoma y fistula rectovaginal.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 62 pacientes con 55 colgajo de Martius y 24 con interposición del músculo gracilis realizados después de fracasos de 164 procedimientos iniciales. La duración total de la estancia hospitalaria fue dos días más larga para la interposición del músculo gracilis ( p = 0,01) sin una diferencia significativa en la morbilidad grave (20% frente a 12%, p = 0,53). El 27% de los colgajos de Martius se realizaron sin estoma, sin impacto en la morbilidad global ( p = 0,763). Las tasas de éxito inmediato por paciente no fueron significativamente diferentes entre los grupos (35% vs. 31%, p = 1,0). El éxito de la interposición del músculo gracilis después del fracaso del colgajo de Martius no fue significativamente diferente de una interposición del músculo gracilis inicial (p = 1,0). La tasa de éxito inmediato aumentó al 49,4% (49% frente a 50%, p = 1,0) después de procedimientos perineales simples. Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 23 meses, no se detectaron diferencias significativas en la tasa de éxito entre los dos procedimientos (69 % frente a 69 %, p = 1,0). El tabaquismo fue el único factor predictivo negativo ( p = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Por su naturaleza retrospectiva, este estudio tiene limitaciones en su comparación.CONCLUSIÓN:Esta novedosa comparación entre colgajo de Martius y la interposición del músculo gracilis sugiere que el colgajo de Martius presenta varias ventajas, incluida una estancia prolongada más corta, una morbilidad similar y un éxito. La derivación proximal a través de un estoma para el colgajo de Martius no parece obligatoria. La interposición del músculo gracilis podría reservarse como procedimiento de rescate después de una falla de colgajo de Martius. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez ).

Faecal diversion remains central in the contemporary management of rectal trauma–Experience from a major trauma centre in South Africa

IntroductionThis paper provides an overview of a single centre's experience with rectal injury over a decade. It hopes to use this data to provide context to our current approach to managing these injuries in the civilian setting. The StudyAll patients with rectal trauma were identified from the Hybrid Electronic Medical Registry (HEMR). ResultsDuring the study period, a total of 88 patients with rectal injuries were admitted to Grey's Hospital in Pietermaritzburg. There were 80 (91 %) males and 8 (9 %) females. The median age was 31 (15–63) years. There were 9 (10 %) blunt mechanisms, 76 (86 %) penetrating mechanisms and 3 (4 %) combined blunt and penetrating mechanisms. Gunshot wounds accounted for the majority of sustained rectal trauma (71 %). There were 57 (65 %) extra-peritoneal injuries, 24 (27 %) intraperitoneal injuries and 7 (8 %) combined injuries. The grade of injury, according to the AAST grading system, was as follows, AAST 1: 16 (18 %), AAST 2: 63 (72 %), AAST 3: 7 (8 %), and AAST 4: 2 (2 %). Pre-sacral drainage and distal rectal washout were not performed. Almost all (55/57) of the extra-peritoneal rectal injuries were managed with proximal diversion (PD). There were five primary repairs (PR) performed in the extra-peritoneal rectal injury cohort. In four of these cases, this was accompanied by a PD. Of the 24 intraperitoneal rectal injuries, 15 underwent PR, of which 11 were performed in conjunction with PD. In total, 20 intraperitoneal rectal injuries underwent PD. All seven combined rectal injuries underwent PD, and three of the combined rectal injuries underwent PR with PD. There was urogenital tract associated morbidity in 8 %, gastrointestinal tract related morbidity in 8 % and septic complications in 11 %. ConclusionRectal trauma is still associated with a high rate of rectal/urogenital and infection related morbidity. Although pre-sacral drainage and distal stump washout have been largely abandoned in civilian practice, faecal diversion currently remains the cornerstone of the management of rectal trauma in our environment. Although there was a low rate of intra-abdominal septic complications in patients who had undergone diversion, this needs to be balanced against the low rate of stoma reversal.

Sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis: To divert or not to divert—A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe role of proximal diversion in patients undergoing sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis for diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis and sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with a proximal diversion in perforated diverticulitis with diffuse peritonitis. MethodA systematic literature search on sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis and sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with proximal diversion for diverticulitis with diffuse peritonitis was conducted in the Medline and EMBASE databases. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies reporting the primary outcome of interest (30-day mortality) were included. Secondary outcomes were major morbidity, anastomotic leak, reoperation, stoma nonreversal rates, and length of hospital stay. A meta-analysis of proportions and linear regression models were used to assess the effect of each procedure on the different outcomes. ResultsA total of 17 studies involving 544 patients (sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis: 287 versus sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with proximal diversion: 257) were included. Thirty-day mortality (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.53–2.40, P = .76), major morbidity (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.80–2.44, P = .24), anastomotic leak (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.099–1.20, P = .10), reoperation (odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.17–1.46, P = .20), and length of stay (sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis: 12.1 vs resection and primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy: 15 days, P = .44) were similar between groups. The risk of definitive stoma was significantly lower after sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis (odds ratio 0.05, 95% confidence interval 0.006–0.35, P = .003). ConclusionSigmoid resection and primary anastomosis with or without proximal diversion have similar postoperative outcomes in selected patients with diverticulitis and diffuse peritonitis. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Perioperative Nutritional Considerations in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Malnutrition is common in surgical patients and is associated with substantially increased morbidity and mortality. Dedicated assessment of nutritional status is advised by major nutrition and surgical societies. Assessment may utilize comprehensive and validated nutritional assessment tools or targeted history, physical examination with accompanying serologic markers to identify nutritional risk preoperatively. Emergent surgery in malnourished patients should proceed as the clinical situation dictates with consideration of ostomy or primary anastomosis with proximal fecal diversion to mitigate postoperative infectious complications. Nonemergent surgery should be delayed to facilitate nutritional optimization via oral nutritional supplementation preferably and total parenteral nutrition if necessary for at least 7 to 14 days. Exclusive enteral nutrition may be considered to optimize nutritional status and inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease. Immunonutrition use in the preoperative setting is not supported by evidence. Perioperative and postoperative immunonutrition may be of benefit but requires dedicated study in the contemporary era. Close attention to preoperative nutritional status and optimization represents a critical opportunity to improve outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Sigmoid Squamous Cell Carcinoma Presenting as a Bladder Mass: A Case Report

Primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the colon and rectum is a rare malignancy, with an incidence of less than 1 in 1,000 diagnosed colorectal cancers. This is a case of a 59-year-old male who presented with a three-month history of urinary symptoms. Work-up, however, revealed a locally-advanced, partially-obstructing primary sigmoid squamous cell carcinoma with extension to the urinary bladder. He subsequently underwent a proximal bowel diversion after extensive carcinomatosis was discovered on diagnostic laparoscopy. Colon SCC represents less than 0.5% of all colorectal tumors, and its incidence is estimated to be 0.1%. Clinically, it presents with similar signs and symptoms as colorectal adenocarcinoma. No standardized management approach has been established yet. A multidisciplinary team approach is essential in dealing with such cases. Keen attention and further investigation are warranted to clearly define the management approach to achieve better outcomes. Key words: colorectal cancer, squamous cell cancer, urinary bladder, rectum

Overuse of Proximal Fecal Diversion in Colorectal Surgery.

Many surgeons tend to overuse proximal fecal diversion in the setting of colonic surgery. The decision to proximally divert an anastomosis should be made with careful consideration of the risks and benefits of proximal diversion. Proximal diversion does not decrease the rate of anastomotic leak, but it does decrease the severity of leaks. Anastomotic height for low pelvic anastomoses, hemodynamic instability, steroid use, male sex, obesity, malnutrition, smoking, and alcohol abuse increase the rate of anastomotic leak. Biologics, most immunosuppressive agents, unprepped colons, and radiation for rectal cancer do not contribute to increased rates of anastomotic leak. Proximal fecal diversion creates additional potential morbidity, higher rates of readmission, and need for a subsequent hospitalization and operation for reversal. Additionally, diverted patients have higher rates of anastomotic stricture and delayed recognition of chronic leaks. These downsides to diversion must be weighed with a patient's perceived ability to handle the physiologic stress and consequences of a severe leak if reoperation is required. When trying to determine which patients can handle a leak, the modified frailty index can help to objectively determine a patient's risk for increased rate of morbidity and failure to rescue in the event of a leak. While proximal diversion is still warranted in many cases, we find that certain clinical scenarios often lead to overuse of proximal diversion. The old surgical adage "If you are considering diverting, you should probably do it" should be tempered by an understanding of the risk and benefits of diversion.

Factors Contributing to Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Surgery: Why, When, and Who Leaks?

Anastomotic leakage is a common yet one of the most feared complications following colorectal surgery. Dehiscence of the anastomosis can result in fatal complications such as peritonitis, abscess formation, and sepsis, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality, cost and length of hospital stay. Multiple factors contribute to the development of anastomotic dehiscence. Several studies have been published identifying various risk factors that may play a role in causing AL. Our study reviewed prospective and retrospective studies and summarized the risk factors into three categories: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Among these are various risk factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, operative time, smoking, alcohol use, obesity, nutritional status, mechanical bowel preparation, and steroid use. It is crucial for surgeons to have a thorough understanding of the risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage to identify patients at high risk preoperatively. It may also be relevant to intraoperative decision-making when establishing an anastomosis, such as considering proximal diversion or placing a drain if such high-risk features are present. Knowing high-risk features also helps to detect leaks as early as possible postoperatively.

The Role of Bile Acid in Improving Glucose Tolerance of Non-Obese Diabetic Rats After Proximal Small Bowel Bypass.

An increase in bile acid (BA) levels after metabolic surgery is an important mechanism for improving glucose metabolism. However, the mechanisms underlying elevated BA levels and the regulatory mechanism of glucose metabolism remain unclear. In this study, we used the Goto-Kakizaki rat model to investigate the mechanism of BA elevation by comparing side-to-side jejunoileal bypass plus proximal loop ligation (SSJIBL) and bile ileum diversion (BID) as well as to explore the mechanism of BA metabolism in regulating blood glucose. The results showed that the fed blood glucose of rats in both the SSJIBL and BID groups was significantly lower than that of the SHAM group on days 2 and 14 after the operation. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) improved in the SSJIBL and BID groups at day 14 postoperatively. The expression of CYP27A1 in the livers of the SSJIBL and BID groups was significantly increased. In addition, total serum BA levels in the SSJIBL and BID groups were significantly increased. Moreover, serum levels of lithocholic acid (LCA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA) were significantly higher in the SSJIBL group than in the SHAM group and negatively correlated with the area under the glucose tolerance curve (AUC-OGTT). In conclusion, increased BA synthesis may be an important cause of elevated total serum BA levels, and LCA and DCA are closely associated with improved glucose metabolism.

Urethral Stricture/Stenosis as a Complication of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound of the Prostate (HIFU): What is the Overall Patient Experience?

To analyze the location and management of urethral stricture/stenosis in patients treated with High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) of the prostate as well as to describe patient reported satisfaction in these men. Patients with a history of HIFU requesting consultation for stricture were identified from 2010 to 2020. Demographic and prior treatment data were recorded. Patients who presented for evaluation underwent retrograde cystoscopy, retrograde urethrogram, voiding cystourethrogram, and antegrade cystoscopy through a suprapubic tract. Patients who only had virtual consultation and did not present for in-person evaluation, were followed longitudinally to assess long-term outcomes and quality of life. Over the 10-year study period, 17 patients were identified with a mean age of 65.8 years. Prior to initial consultation, a total of 88% of patients had at least 1 failed surgical intervention at a mean of 45 months post-HIFU. The majority of patients (94%) had strictures that included but were not necessarily limited to the prostatic urethra. Patients underwent various treatments postevaluation, favoring endoscopic therapy (38%), and proximal diversion (20%) at a mean follow-up of 68.2 ± 7.5 months. Only 38% reported satisfaction with urinary symptoms. Urethral narrowing post-HIFU appears to overwhelmingly involve the prostatic urethra. Patients usually have a significant treatment burden over a prolonged period and are often managed with repeated endoscopic treatment, extirpative prostatic surgery, or urinary diversion as they have obstruction that is not amendable to urethral reconstruction. Most patients with HIFU strictures experience a diminished QOL due to persistent urinary symptoms.

Anorectal Malignancies Presenting as a Perianal Abscess or Fistula.

Acute anorectal abscess and fistula are common conditions that usually presents as a painful lump close to the anal margin. Tumors in the distal rectum and in the perianal region may mimic the symptoms and signs of anorectal sepsis, thereby leading to a delay in diagnosis and management. The purpose of this study was to describe patients presenting with acute perianal abscess or fistula who were subsequently diagnosed with anorectal cancer. We performed a retrospective, review of all cases presenting with acute perianal abscess or fistula who were subsequently found to have anorectal carcinoma on biopsy in two tertiary centers. We analyzed the data focusing on the clinical features, laboratory values, clinical staging of the tumors, the subsequent management, the pathological staging, and the outcome of each patient. Overall, 3219 patients presenting with anorectal abscess or fistula were reviewed. Cancer was diagnosed in 16 (.5%) patients, 12 with adenocarcinoma of the rectum and 4 with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. In 5 patients (31.2%), cancer was diagnosed in the setting of chronic perianal fistula, 4 of them had Crohn's disease. In 10 patients (62.5%), cancer was not diagnosed during the initial evaluation of the acute symptoms. A high index of suspicion is required to make the diagnosis of perianal tumors when assessing patients presenting with perianal sepsis, particularly those with Crohn's disease, a long history of persistent perianal disease, and an advanced age. In most cases, proper drainage followed by proximal diversion are the surgical treatment of choice in the acute setting.

MP22-09 URETHRAL STRICTURE/STENOSIS AS A COMPLICATION OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND OF THE PROSTATE: WHAT IS THE OVERALL PATIENT EXPERIENCE?

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP22-09 URETHRAL STRICTURE/STENOSIS AS A COMPLICATION OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND OF THE PROSTATE: WHAT IS THE OVERALL PATIENT EXPERIENCE? David Barham, John Barnard, and Joel Gelman David BarhamDavid Barham More articles by this author , John BarnardJohn Barnard More articles by this author , and Joel GelmanJoel Gelman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002561.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Urethral stricture/stenosis develops in about 19% of patients on average, and is generally treated endoscopically. The literature does not describe in any detail the location of obstruction, treatment success rate, or impact on the patient's quality of life(QOL). Our objective was to analyze patients with HIFU stricture/stenosis to characterize location, management, and patient reported satisfaction. METHODS: Patients with a history of HIFU requesting consultation for stricture were identified from 2010-2020. Demographic and prior treatment data were recorded. Patients who presented for evaluation underwent cystoscopy, retrograde urethrogram, and voiding cystourethrogram. Patients, including those who did not present for in-person consultation, were followed longitudinally to assess long-term outcomes and QOL. RESULTS: 29 patients were identified with a mean age of 65.8 years. Prior to initial consultation, a total of 86.2% of patients had at least one failed surgical intervention at a mean of 45.1 months post-HIFU. Seventeen patients underwent urethral evaluation and 94.1% had strictures that included but were not necessarily limited to the prostatic urethra. Additionally, 35.3% had bladder neck stenosis, 23.5% had membranous stenosis, and 17.6% had anterior urethral strictures. 20 patients underwent various treatments post-evaluation, favoring endoscopic therapy (45%) and proximal diversion (20%) at a mean of 67.1 months follow-up (Table 1). Only 33.3% reported satisfaction with urinary symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral narrowing post-HIFU appears to overwhelmingly involve the prostatic urethra. Patients usually have a significant treatment burden over a prolonged period and are often managed with repeated endoscopic or extirpative prostatic surgery. Some undergo urinary diversion, but most patients with HIFU strictures experience a diminished QOL due to persistent urinary symptoms. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e374 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information David Barham More articles by this author John Barnard More articles by this author Joel Gelman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Trajectory of change of low anterior resection syndrome over time after restorative proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer is associated with a high incidence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), but few studies report longitudinal results for bowel function. The aim of our study was to examine the trajectory of change of LARS over the first 18months after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. A prospective database measuring functional outcomes in rectal cancer patients from a single university-affiliated specialist colorectal referral center from 10/2018 to 03/2020 was queried. Patients were included in this study if they underwent restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer and had at least three assessments in the first 18months after primary surgery or after closure of proximal diversion. Bowel function was assessed using the LARS score, administered at every surveillance follow-up after restoration of bowel continuity. Latent-class growth curve (trajectory) analysis was used to identify different trajectories of LARS changes over the first 18months and group patients into these trajectory groups. These groups were then compared to identify predictors for each trajectory. A total of 95 patients were included (63 males, mean age. 61.3 ± 12.5years). Trajectory analysis identified three distinct trajectory groups. Group 1 had stable minimal LARS over time (26%). Group 2 had early LARS scores consistent with the minor LARS category and improved with time (28%). Group 3 had persistently high LARS scores (45%). Neoadjuvant therapy, intersphincteric resection, and proximal diversion were more common in group 3. We identified three main trajectories of change of LARS in the 18months after restorative proctectomy. These data may be used to better inform patients of their expected postoperative bowel function.

Utility of a Large, Retrospective Database in Guiding Deliberate Use of Primary Anastomosis With Proximal Diversion

Utility of a Large, Retrospective Database in Guiding Deliberate Use of Primary Anastomosis With Proximal Diversion

Comparison of Diversion Strategies for Management of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis in a US Nationwide Cohort

Diverticulitis of the colon is an increasingly prevalent disease with significant implications for patient quality of life and health system resource expenditure. Although several randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses of Hartman procedure (HP) and primary anastomosis and proximal diversion (PAPD) have found surgical equipoise, questions regarding the relative performance of these treatments when applied broadly remain. To examine use of and outcomes after urgent sigmoid colectomy with end colostomy (ie, HP) vs PAPD in management of complicated diverticulitis. This retrospective cross-sectional study was a multicenter, population-based examination of inpatient hospitalizations, not including long-term rehabilitation facilities, using data from the 2014 to 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. It was performed from November 2020 to January 2021. Included patients were adults admitted with acute diverticulitis requiring HP or PAPD within 48 hours of admission. Undergoing HP vs PAPD. Inverse probability treatment analysis was used to compare outcomes, including index mortality, composite complications (ie, neurologic, infectious, and cardiovascular complications), length of stay, and readmissions within 90 days. During the study period, an estimated 1 072 395 adults (615 954 [57.4%] women; median [IQR] age, 64 [52-76] years) required nonelective hospitalization for acute colonic diverticulutus. A total of 34 126 patients required diversion, with 32 326 patients (94.7%) undergoing HP and 1800 patients (5.3%) undergoing PAPD within 48 hours of admission. Patients undergoing PAPD had a decreased median (IQR) age (60 [51-70] years vs 65 [54-74] years; P < .001) and decreased rates of end organ dysfunction (520 patients [28.9%] vs 11 514 patients [35.6%]; P < .001). In inverse probability treatment weight analysis, the odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.32-1.40), complications (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.13), and nonhome discharge (aOR 1.15; 95% CI, 0.83-1.60) were similar for PAPD compared with HP. Among 1772 patients who underwent PAPD and survived index hospitalization, there was an increased incidence of 90-day readmission compared with 30 851 patients who underwent HP and survived index hospitalization (393 patients [22.2%] vs 4384 patients [14.2%]; P < .001) with increased hazard of ostomy reversal (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.08-1.99). This study found that the use of PAPD was associated with comparable index hospitalization outcomes vs use of HP, while readmission rate and ostomy risk were statistically significantly increased among patients who underwent PAPD compared with patients who underwent HP. These findings suggest that further delineation of criteria for appropriate application of PAPD in the urgent setting are warranted.

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak, Consideration for Proximal Diversion, and Appropriate Use of Drains.

Anastomotic leaks are a major source of morbidity after colorectal surgery. There is a myriad of risk factors that may contribute to anastomotic leaks. These risk factors can be categorized as modifiable, nonmodifiable, and intraoperative factors. Identification of these risk factors allows for preoperative optimization that may minimize the risk of anastomotic leak. Knowledge of such high-risk features may also affect intraoperative decision-making regarding the creation of an anastomosis, consideration for proximal diversion, or placement of a drain. A thorough understanding of the interplay between risk factors, indications for proximal diversion, and utility of drain placement is imperative for colorectal surgeons.

Management of Acute Anastomotic Leaks.

Management of the acute anastomotic leak is complex and patient-specific. Clinically stable patients often benefit from a nonoperative approach utilizing antibiotics with or without percutaneous drainage. Clinically unstable patients or nonresponders to conservative management require operative intervention. Surgical management is dictated by the degree of contamination and inflammation but includes drainage with proximal diversion, anastomotic resection with end-stoma creation, or reanastomosis with proximal diversion. Newer therapies, including colorectal stenting, vacuum-assisted rectal drainage, and endoscopic clipping, have also been described.

Diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leak after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: current status and future prospect

Anastomotic leak is one of inevitable postoperative complications of rectal cancer. With the improvement of surgical techniques, the enhancement of the cognization of rectal cancer, and the development of surgical instruments, surgical procedures of rectal cancer are getting more sophisticated. The anastomosis is performed lower and lower, however the incidence of anastomotic leak is not significantly decreased. In addition, different from intraperitoneal anastomotic leak, the low rectal anastomotic leak after low anterior resection has many special issues in the diagnosis and treatment in clinic. The incidence of peritonitis caused by low anastomotic leak is low, the onset time is late, and symptoms of peritonitis are mild. So most low anastomotic leak is treated conservatively, second surgical repair or resection of anastomotic site is rarely performed, and proximal intestinal diversion is commonly performed. In the prevention of low anastomotic leak, some techniques and precautions during the perioperative period and identification of high risk factors might play important roles. Combined our clinical experiences, we introduced the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and research progression of low anastomotic leak after anterior resection of low rectal cancer, we hope it would be helpful.

What is the best method of rectovaginal fistula repair? A 25-year single-center experience.

The surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) remains challenging and there is a lack of data to demonstrate the best, single procedure. The aim of this study was to assess the results of different surgical operations for rectovaginal fistula. Patients with RVF who underwent surgical repair between 1992 and 2017 at a single, tertiary care center were included. Twenty different procedures were performed including: primary closure, closure with sphincter repair, flap repairs, plug/fibrin/mesh repair, examination under anesthesia (EUA) ± seton placement, abdominal resections with and without diversion and ileostomy takedown, gracilis muscle transposition, fistulotomy/ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. All patients with RVF due to diverticulitis and patients without complete data from paper charting were excluded. Success was defined based on the absence of symptoms related to RVF and absence of diverting stoma at 6months. One hundred twenty-four women were analyzed. The median age was 45 (range 18-84) years. Median follow-up time from the last procedure was 6months (range 0-203months). The total number of patients considered successfully treated at the end of their treatment was 91 (91/124, 73.4%). When considering all procedures (n = 255), the success rate for flap procedures was 57.9% (22/38), followed by abdominal resections with and without proximal diversion and ileostomy takedown (16/29, 55.2%) and primary closure with sphincter repair (17/32, 53.1%) while fistula plug, and fibrin glue had among the lowest success rates (4/22, 18.2%). The highest success rate was observed among patients whose RVF etiology was due to malignancy (11/16, 68.8%) followed by unknown (8/14, 57%) and iatrogenic (21/48, 43.8%) causes. Local procedures such as mucosal flap or primary closure and sphincteroplasty are associated with a high success rate should be considered in patients with low-lying, simple RVF. Abdominal resections with and without proximal diversions and ileostomy takedown have a relatively high success rate in selected patients. The low success rate of fibrin glue and fistula plugs demonstrates their low efficacy in RVF; thus, these procedures should be avoided in the treatment algorithm.