GH Provocation Research Articles

RF26 | PMON327 Patient and Parent Characteristics Related to Quality of Life and Self-esteem in Healthy Youth Undergoing Provocative GH Testing

Abstract Background Families often seek medical care for a child's short stature due to concerns about how short stature affects psychosocial function in childhood and projected into adulthood. However, height is a poor predictor of psychosocial adjustment, and there is a critical gap in our understanding of how patient and parent characteristics alter the potential impact of being short. Hypothesis We hypothesized that among healthy youth undergoing medical evaluation for short stature, youth quality of life (QoL) and self-esteem would be associated with youth and parental characteristics rather than height. Methods Healthy youth aged 8-14 years who underwent provocative GH testing in our Growth Center and a parent participant each completed surveys at or around the time of testing. Surveys collected demographic data; youth and parent report of youth health-related QoL (PedsQL and Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth [QoLISSY]); youth reports of self-esteem (Self-Perception Profile for Children [SPP]), coping skills (Coping Strategies Inventory), and social support (Social Support Scale for Children); and parent reports of perceived environmental threats (World Out There), goals for their child (Achievement Goals), and autonomy support (Parents As Social Context Questionnaire). Clinical data were extracted from the patients’ electronic health records. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± SD. Univariate models with Holm-Bonferroni correction of significance level 0.05 assessed the marginal effect of each factor on QoL and self-esteem outcomes. Multivariable linear regression models with stepwise selection approaches were used to identify significant predictors of QoL and self-esteem. Results Participants included 60 youth (15 female/45 male; age 11.77 ± 1.93 years; 50% prepubertal, 37% Tanner 2, 13% Tanner 3; height Z-score -2.18 ± 0.61) and their parents (55 female/5 male; age 45.65 ± 7.25 years). In multivariable regression, the youth PedsQL physical domain was associated positively with grade in school and perceived friend support. The youth PedsQL psychosocial domain was associated positively with perceived support from classmates and friends, but negatively with disengaged coping. The youth QoLISSY total score was associated positively with perceived support from classmates. Youth's global self-esteem (SPP) was associated positively with perceived classmate support and mid-parental height Z-score. Parent report of youth psychosocial QoL (PedsQL) was associated positively with perceived classmate support. None of the other analogous parent assessment outcomes were associated with the QoL or self-esteem outcomes. Neither youth height nor height Z-score was associated with any of the QoL or self-esteem outcomes. Conclusions Perceived social support and coping skills were associated with QoL and self-esteem in healthy short youth, whereas youth height was not, and constitute an important potential area of clinical intervention. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m., Monday, June 13, 2022 1:12 p.m. - 1:17 p.m.

Association between overweight and growth hormone secretion in patients with non-functioning pituitary tumors.

IntroductionGrowth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is often complicated by non-functioning pituitary tumors (NFPTs); however, its prevalence remains unclear because preoperative screening for GHD with provocative tests is not recommended. Accordingly, we attempted to clarify the characteristics of GHD in unoperated patients with NFPT.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed adult patients with non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) and Rathke’s cyst who underwent preoperative GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) tests from January 2013 to December 2016. We investigated the association between peak GH response to GHRP-2 and background characteristics.ResultsAmong 104 patients (85 NFPA and 19 Rathke’s cysts), 45 (43%) presented severe GHD, as diagnosed using GHRP-2 tests. Body mass index (β = -0.210, P = 0.007), free thyroxine (β = 0.440, P < 0.001), and tumor height (β = -0.254, P < 0.001) were significant variables for determining the peak GH response to GHRP-2 in multiple regression analyses. Overweight (odds ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–14.66) was significantly associated with severe GHD after adjustment for age, sex, creatinine, free thyroxine, tumor height and clinical diagnosis. The regression slopes between tumor height and peak GH response to GHRP-2 significantly differed between overweight patients and non-overweight individuals, as determined by analysis of covariance (P = 0.040). In the 48 patients who underwent postoperative GHRP-2 tests, severe postoperative GHD was significantly more common in overweight patients than non-overweight individuals (100% vs. 48%, P < 0.001).ConclusionWe observed a negative synergistic effect between overweight and tumor size on GH secretion in patients with NFPTs, indicating that GH provocation tests for diagnosing underestimated GHD could be considered in overweight unoperated patients with large NFPTs.

Growth hormone responses to provocative tests in children with short stature.

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is defined as a serum peak GH concentration <10 ng/mL with provocation as tested by a combination of at least two separate tests. The aim of this study was to compare two standard tests, insulin and levodopa (L-dopa), with a primary focus on specificity and accuracy. Clinical data were collected retrospectively from a review of 120 children who visited the pediatric endocrine clinic at Chonnam National University Hospital for the evaluation of short stature between January 2006 and April 2014. Subjects underwent GH provocation tests with insulin and L-dopa. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after administration, and GH levels were measured. In the insulin test, serial glucose levels were also checked, closely monitoring hypoglycemia. A total of 83 children (69.2%) were diagnosed with GHD and 37 children (30.8%) were diagnosed with idiopathic short stature (ISS). Peak GH levels were achieved an average of 45 min after the administration of insulin and L-dopa for both groups. The specificity and accuracy were 78.4% and 93.6% for the insulin test and 29.7% and 79.2% for L-dopa test, respectively. In the ISS group, the cumulative frequency of a GH cutoff value of >10 ng/mL at 120 min was 75.6% after insulin stimulation compared with 35.1% after L-dopa stimulation. Considering these results, we recommend performing the insulin test first to exclude ISS and then the L-dopa test for the diagnosis of GHD. This way, ISS patients are diagnosed after a single test, thus reducing hospital days and the burden of undergoing two serial tests.

Characterisation and growth outcomes of children with Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 deficiency in idiopathic short stature

Background/aimsChildren with idiopathic short stature (ISS) constitute a heterogenous group. Recombinant IGF-I (rhIGF-I) have been licensed for the treatment of severe short stature (height <−3 standard deviation scores (SDS)) in...

A Novel Missense Mutation in the SH2 Domain of theSTAT5BGene Results in a Transcriptionally Inactive STAT5b Associated with Severe IGF-I Deficiency, Immune Dysfunction, and Lack of Pulmonary Disease

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b (STAT5b) deficiency, first reported in a patient who carried a p.Ala630Pro missense mutation in the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, results in a rare clinical condition of GH insensitivity (GHI), IGF-I deficiency (IGFD), and severe immune dysregulation manifesting as progressive worsening of pulmonary function. The new patient presented with severe cutaneous eczema, episodic infections in the first years of life, and autoimmune thyroiditis. Immunological evaluation revealed T lymphopenia, but severe pulmonary symptoms were notably absent. She concomitantly exhibited pronounced growth failure, reaching an adult height of 124.7 cm [-5.90 SD score (SDS)]. Endocrine evaluations (normal provocative GH tests; low serum IGF-I, -3.7 SDS, and IGF-binding protein-3, -4.5 SDS) were consistent with GHI and IGFD. Analysis of the STAT5B gene revealed a novel homozygous missense mutation, p.Phe646Ser, located within the βD' strand of the SH2 domain. Reconstitution studies demonstrated expression of the p.Phe646Ser variant was less robust than wild type but, in contrast to the previously described STAT5B p.Ala630Pro SH2 mutation, could be phosphorylated in response to GH and interferon-γ. The phosphorylated p.Phe646Ser, however, could not drive transcription. A novel STAT5B p.Phe646Ser mutation has been identified in a patient with clinical characteristics of STAT5b deficiency. Only the second STAT5B missense mutation identified, its lack of transcriptional activities despite GH-induced phosphorylation, confirms the crucial role of STAT5b for regulating the expression of IGF1 and provides insights into the importance of the SH2 βD' strand for full STAT5b transcriptional activities. Whether the phosphorylated p.Phe646Ser variant retained functions that prevented pulmonary distress remains unresolved.

A novel GH-1 gene mutation (GH-P59L) causes partial GH deficiency type II combined with bioinactive GH syndrome

Context and ObjectiveDespite the differences in the main characteristics between the autosomal dominant form of GH deficiency (IGHD II) and the bioinactive GH syndrome, a common feature of both is their impact on linear growth leading to short stature in all affected patients. DesignThe index patient, a boy, was referred for assessment of his short stature (−2.54 SD score) and a delayed bone age of 5.9yrs at the chronological age of 7.7yrs. The GHD was confirmed by standard GH provocation tests, which revealed modestly reduced GH and IGF-I concentrations. Further genetic analysis of GH-1 gene identified heterozygosity for GH-P59L mutation. The secretion of the GH-P59L following stimulation with forskolin was investigated and compared to that of the wt-GH after expression of both GH variants in AtT-20 cells. Based on the position of P59L mutation that lies within a patch of residues composing the GH binding site 1 for GHR, we performed the analysis of GH-P59L binding to GHR by in silico mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations, which suggested possible problems in correct binding of GH-P59L to the GHR. Therefore, the functional characterization of this GH mutant was assessed through studies of GHR binding and activation of Jak2/Stat5 signaling pathway. ResultsIn line with the clinical data of the patient GH deficiency is suggested, underlined by GH-secretion studies revealing a moderate difference in secretion between GH-P59L and wt-GH. In addition, further functional characterization of the GH-P59L by studies of GH-receptor binding and activation of Jak2/Stat5 pathway presented with a reduced binding affinity of GH-P59L for GHR and decreased bioactivity compared to the wt-GH. ConclusionsThe clinical data of the patient combined with the laboratory data support the diagnosis of partial IGHD type II. Since the GH deficiency was not total, additional binding and signaling studies were performed, which revealed that the GH-P59L variant displays some of the common features of bioinactive GH syndrome. Taken together, in this study we report a patient suffering from the combination of two growth disorders (alteration of secretion as well as bioactivity) caused by a GH-1 gene alteration highlighting the necessity of functional analysis of any GH variant, despite the presence of obvious clinical features of IGHD type II.

Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency Type II: A Novel GH-1 Gene Mutation (GH-R178H) Affecting Secretion and Action

ABSTRACT Context and Objective Main features of the autosomal dominant form of GH deficiency (IGHD II) include markedly reduced secretion of GH combined with low concentrations of IGF-I leading to short stature. Design, Setting, and Patients A female patient presented with short stature (height −6.0 sd score) and a delayed bone age of 2 yr at the chronological age of 5 yr. Later, at the age of 9 yr, GHD was confirmed by standard GH provocation test, which revealed subnormal concentrations of GH and a very low IGF-I. Genetic analysis of the GH-1 gene revealed the presence of a heterozygous R178H mutation. Interventions and Results AtT-20 cells coexpressing both wt-GH and GH-R178H showed a reduced GH secretion after forskolin stimulation compared with the cells expressing only wt-GH, supporting the diagnosis of IGHD II. Because reduced GH concentrations found in the circulation of our untreated patient could not totally explain her severe short stature, functional characterization of the GH-R178H performed by studies of GH receptor binding and activation of the Janus kinase-2/signal transducer and activator of transcription-5 pathway revealed a reduced binding affinity of GH-R178H for GH receptor and signaling compared with the wt-GH. Conclusion This is the first report of a patient suffering from short stature caused by a GH-1 gene alteration affecting not only GH secretion (IGHD II) but also GH binding and signaling, highlighting the necessity of functional analysis of any GH variant, even in the alleged situation of IGHD II.

Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency Type II: A Novel GH-1 Gene Mutation (GH-R178H) Affecting Secretion and Action

Main features of the autosomal dominant form of GH deficiency (IGHD II) include markedly reduced secretion of GH combined with low concentrations of IGF-I leading to short stature. A female patient presented with short stature (height -6.0 sd score) and a delayed bone age of 2 yr at the chronological age of 5 yr. Later, at the age of 9 yr, GHD was confirmed by standard GH provocation test, which revealed subnormal concentrations of GH and a very low IGF-I. Genetic analysis of the GH-1 gene revealed the presence of a heterozygous R178H mutation. AtT-20 cells coexpressing both wt-GH and GH-R178H showed a reduced GH secretion after forskolin stimulation compared with the cells expressing only wt-GH, supporting the diagnosis of IGHD II. Because reduced GH concentrations found in the circulation of our untreated patient could not totally explain her severe short stature, functional characterization of the GH-R178H performed by studies of GH receptor binding and activation of the Janus kinase-2/signal transducer and activator of transcription-5 pathway revealed a reduced binding affinity of GH-R178H for GH receptor and signaling compared with the wt-GH. This is the first report of a patient suffering from short stature caused by a GH-1 gene alteration affecting not only GH secretion (IGHD II) but also GH binding and signaling, highlighting the necessity of functional analysis of any GH variant, even in the alleged situation of IGHD II.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Peak Growth Hormone Response to Provocative Testing in Children with Short Stature

Obesity is associated with decreased spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion, but the effect of body mass index (BMI) on results of GH stimulation testing in children with short stature is not known. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of BMI on peak GH to provocative testing in children with short stature. This was a retrospective review of provocative GH testing performed in 116 children 2-18 yr old in the ambulatory clinic of the Pediatric Endocrinology Unit at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 2004-2008. The main outcome measure was peak stimulated GH. Height, weight, IGF-I, and IGF-binding protein 3 were also measured. In univariate regression analysis, BMI sd score (BMI SDS) was inversely associated with natural log (ln) peak GH to provocative testing (P = 0.002), whereas height SDS, ln IGF-I, and IGF-binding protein 3 were not significantly associated with ln peak GH. After controlling for age, gender, BMI, and pubertal status, BMI (P = 0.002) remained independently associated with ln peak GH. BMI SDS significantly influenced the likelihood of diagnosis of GH deficiency using peak GH cutoffs of 10, 7, and 5 microg/liter. In children with short stature, BMI affects peak stimulated GH and should be considered when interpreting GH testing. Higher BMI SDS, even within the normal range, may lead to overdiagnosis of GH deficiency.

Functional aspects of genetic variability in the GH genomic region

Because of the small differences among genotypes, it would be difficult in basal conditions to detect the effect of genetic polymorphism in endocrine function, but this could emerge during provocative tests. We have studied four polymorphic sites of the GH gene region (17q24.2), MSPIA, MSPIB, BGLIIA, and BGLIIB. Gene and haplotype distributions in classes of growth retardation have been studied. The outcome of GH diagnostic test in relation to GH region genotypes has been evaluated by the analysis of area under the GH secretory curve. Ninety-eight growth retarded children have been studied. On the basis of provocative GH test these children were classified as total GH deficit (TD), partial GH deficit (PD), and familial short stature (FSS) with no deficit of GH. Sixty-three healthy controls were also considered. An increased frequency of MSPIA*2 allele in PD and TD as compared with FSS children and controls has been observed suggesting that this allele is associated with a decreased GH release. BGLIIA*2 allele appears decreased in PD and TD as compared with FSS and controls, suggesting that this allele is associated with an increased release of GH. Carriers of MSPIA*2 allele show a lower GH release as compared with MSPIA *1/*1 subjects on the provocative test by insulin, while carriers of BGLIIA*2 allele show a higher GH release as compared with BGLIIA *1/*1 subjects on the provocative test by clonidine. The functional aspects of genetic variability within the GH genomic area parallel the genetic differences observed between TD and PD versus FSS and control children.

A Boy with "transient" Growth Hormone Deficiency in Prepubertal Stage Despite Normal Growth Hormone Secretion in Childhood and after Puberty

Transient growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is occasionally found in prepubertal individuals, and this phenomenon has been variously interpreted. Sex steroids enhance GH secretion; however, the cut-off values of provocative GH tests are not modified according to the physiological changes. Physiological changes in sex steroid levels are thought to cause the image of transient GHD. In addition, the reproducibility of provocative GH tests makes the interpretation complicated. We experienced a case of a boy with short stature who had undergone provocative GH tests at three different times: childhood (5 and 7 years old), before puberty (12 years old), and in adolescence (15 years old). Although the responses of GH in his childhood and adolescence were within the normal range, his prepubertal GH response was extremely low, as if he had "complete" GHD (peak GH: insulin test, 0.60 ng/ml; clonidine test, 0.78 ng/ml). No morphological changes were observed in the pituitary gland or hypothalamus on MRI. The level of insulin-like growth factor 1 was in the normal range for his age at this time. Here, we report the clinical course and endocrinological data of this case, and suggest that transient GHD is caused not only by the physiological effects of sex steroids but also by certain mechanisms that actively reduce GH secretion.

Ghrelin test for the assessment of GH status in successfully treated patients with acromegaly

Posttreatment assessment of disease activity and definition of cure of acromegaly, using measurement of GH secretion, remains problematic. Furthermore, with our efforts to achieve tight biochemical control of the disease it is foreseeable that a proportion of patients may be rendered GH deficient, thus requiring testing for GH deficiency. The aim of our study was to evaluate residual GH secretion in cured patients with acromegaly. At baseline, circulating GH, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, leptin and lipid (cholesterol and tri-glycerides) levels were measured in 33 acromegalic patients nine years after treatment with surgery of whom 6 were additionally irradiated. Two tests were performed: the GH suppression test--oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the GH provocation test--ghrelin test (1 microg/kg i.v. bolus) and the results were compared with 11 age- and sex-matched control subjects. According to the consensus criteria (normal IGF-I levels and post-OGTT GH nadir <1 microg/l), 21 treated acromegalic patients were cured, 6 had discordant IGF-I and GH nadir values during OGTT, while 6 had persistent acromegaly. After the GH provocative test with ghrelin (cut-off for severe GH deficiency is GH <3 microg/l), we detected 9 severely GH deficient patients (GHD) among 21 cured acromegalic patients. Mean GH peak (+/-s.e.m.) response to the ghrelin test in GHD acromegalics was significantly lower compared with acromegalics with sufficient GH secretory capacity and control subjects (1.2 +/- 0.2 microg/l vs 20.1 +/- 2.4 microg/l vs 31.1 +/- 2.5 microg/l respectively, P<0.0001). Mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were not different between GHD and GH-sufficient cured acromegalics. Leptin levels and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in GHD male acromegalics compared with GH-sufficient male acromegalics. GHD female acromegalics tended to have higher BMIs while leptin levels were not different. The assessment of residual GH secretory capacity by the GH provocation test is necessary in the long-term follow-up of successfully treated acromegalics since a large proportion of these patients are rendered GH deficient.

Three-Year Follow-up Study on Serum Leptin Levels in GH Deficient Children with GH Replacement Therapy.

Interactions between GH and leptin have been extensively studied. However, results of long-term GH therapy on serum leptin levels in GH-deficient children were not consistent. Moreover, no such reports were available in Japanese children with this disease. We studied 35 Japanese patients with GH deficiency (26 boys and 9 girls, mean age: 9.8 ± 6.2 yr old), of whom 6 patients with complete and 29 with incomplete GH deficiency were identified by GH provocation test. Serum leptin levels, percent of ideal body weight (%IBW) and percent fat (%fat) were determined at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 mo after beginning GH therapy. Baseline levels of %fat and leptin were significantly higher in girls than boys (P<0.05), though serum leptin did not change throughout the study period in either group. Further, %IBW did not change significantly, whereas %fat exhibited significant changes after 6 mo in boys and remained virtually constant thereafter for up to 3 yr. In summary, serum leptin levels did not change in GH-deficient boys and girls during the 3-yr period after the start of GH replacement therapy, despite a decrease in %fat after 6 mo of therapy in the boys. Thus, it is conceivable that long-term GH replacement therapy can be employed without an effect on normal leptin secretion.

The role of growth hormone in determining birth size and early postnatal growth, using congenital growth hormone deficiency (GHD) as a model

The role of GH in early human growth is unclear. Congenital GH deficiency (CGHD) provides a useful tool to explore this putative role. We have assessed the effects of CGHD on birth size and early postnatal growth, and the further impact of the presence of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies and midline brain defects on these parameters. Weight, length and BMI expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS), over the first two years of life, were retrospectively compared in 44 GH-deficient children (M:F 26 : 18). Thirty-eight of 44 patients underwent GH provocation testing and all patients had neuro-imaging of the brain. The patients were divided into three groups of increasing phenotypic complexity {group A [n = 12, isolated GHD, no midline defects], group B [n = 10, combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD); no midline defects], group C (n = 22, CPHD with midline defects)}. Mean birth weight, length and BMI SDS were -0.4, -0.9 and +0.1 SDS, respectively. The differences were significant for weight (P = 0.03) and BMI (P = 0.003), but not length (P = 0.3) SDS, between groups A and C. Of the three groups, group A had a lower weight and BMI SDS than group C. The prevalence of postnatal complications (n = 25) was significantly different in the three groups [group A (8%), group B (80%), group C (73%); P < 0.001] and particularly between patients with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) (group A) and CPHD (groups B and C; P < 0.0001). No patients in group A presented with neonatal hypoglycaemia as compared with 70% of those in group B and 59% in group C (P = 0.001). A reduced length SDS was observed in all patients within 6 months of birth and the reduction was greatest in group B (P = 0.03). Group C remained significantly (P < 0.05) heavier at 12, 18 and 24 months compared to group A. BMI SDS was significantly (P < 0.05) greater at all study points in CPHD patients (groups B and C) as compared with IGHD. Serum GH concentrations at testing did not correlate significantly with birth length (r = -0.08, P = 0.7), birth weight (r = -0.08, P = 0.6) or the age at induction of GH treatment (r = 0.12, P = 0.5). There were no significant differences between peak serum GH concentrations in patients in groups A (7.8 +/- 6.3 mU/l), B (3.9 +/- 4.8 mU/l) or C (8.7 +/- 5.4 mU/l). Length, weight and BMI data from our study groups suggest that GH per se has a minimal effect on intrauterine growth but a significant effect during the infancy period. Early growth may also be influenced by the complexity of the hypopituitary phenotype reflected by the presence of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies and midline forebrain defects.

A brief review of the use and utility of growth hormone stimulation testing in the NCGS: Do we need to do provocative GH testing?

True growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in childhood, while rare, has major clinical consequences. GHD is often associated with other pituitary hormone deficiencies, so these children may require multiple hormonal replacement and close clinical follow-up to optimize their outcome. Growth hormone stimulation testing (GHST), as currently conducted, is not a reliable diagnostic tool. Both changes in growth hormone assay methodologies and increases in the diagnostic threshold contribute to the incorrect labeling of a substantial proportion of normal children as having idiopathic GHD. Fortunately, newer imaging technologies and laboratory tests form a more rational basis to diagnose true GHD. The use of GHST among GH-naive subjects (<20 years of age) enrolled in the National Cooperative Growth Study has declined over the past two decades, from a high of 89% between 1987 and 1989 to only 52% in 2002. Given that GH stimulation testing does not meaningfully aid in distinguishing those few children with true growth hormone deficiency from the much more common short normal child and that alternatives are now available, it is time to discontinue the routine use of GHST in children.

Evaluation of IGF-I Levels in Subjects whose GH Secretion Status was Judged Mainly by Auxological Data

Serum IGF-I levels are one of the important clinical parameters in the evaluation of GH secretion. Almost all previous reports on the clinical utility of serum IGF-I levels in the evaluation of GH secretion have been based on the comparison between IGF-I levels and GH peaks of the GH provocation test. GH provocation tests have limitations such as a relative lack of normal values. There has been no report on serum IGF-I levels in short children whose heights were monitored over a range of years and whose diagnosis was made not based on GH peaks of the GH provocation test. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of IGF-I levels based on clinical and auxological data without using GH peaks of the GH provocation test. Here, 125 subjects with short stature were seen at least twice for more than a year from 1985 to 2000 at our hospital. Four populations were selected from the 125 subjects without using GH peaks of the GH provocation tests. The first group (CGHD, N=15), complete GH deficiency, consisted of prepubertal patients with growth velocity less than -1.5 SD, invisible/thin stalk on MRI or CNS lesion such as brain tumor. The second group (HV-N, N=22), subjects of prepubertal and growing children with short stature (Ht +0 SD). The third group (FH-N, N=8) subjects had short height (Ht -2 SD). The fourth group subjects were prepubertal short children (Ht -2 SD), except for one subject in group HV-D. In conclusion, IGF-I measurements are useful for screening patients who need GH treatment and probably for diagnosing GHD. Additional IGFBP-3 measurements are valuable in diagnosing GHD especially at the age of less than five years.

Analysis of the intracellular signalling domain of the human growth hormone receptor in children with idiopathic short stature

To investigate the hypothesis that intracellular, dominant-negative mutations of the growth hormone receptor (GHR) exist in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and partial growth hormone insensitivity (GHI). We studied 31 children aged 4.55-13.14 years with ISS (height </= -1.8 standard deviation scores, UK standards 1990). GH provocation tests (glucagon 15 microg kg-1 i.m.) excluded GH deficiency in all subjects. Serum IGF-I levels were below the 50th centile for age in all subjects and below the 10th centile in 64.5% of cases. GH binding protein levels were normal in the 24 subjects in whom it was measured (mean 25.2%; range 10-42.6%). Exons 9 and 10 of the GHR were amplified by PCR from leucocyte-derived DNA. Samples were directly sequenced on the ABI 377 DNA analyser using the - 21 M13 dye primer cycle sequencing protocol for optimum heterozygote detection. No abnormalities were detected in exon 9 which encodes the proline-rich box 1 motif. In exon 10 two sequence variants were found; a heterozygous, single base alteration (TCT to TCC) in codon 325 which does not change the amino acid sequence in one patient, and the L526I variant in 24 subjects. L526I is a conservative amino acid change and had an allele frequency of 0.53 in our patients, which is similar to that reported in a control population. The apparent partial growth hormone insensitivity in this group of idiopathic short-stature subjects is not related to heterozygous, dominant-negative variants of the intracellular signalling domain of the GHR. Hence it is likely that other genetic and environmental factors may be involved.

Changes in serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations during the IGF-I generation test performed prospectively in children with short stature.

Genotype and phenotype heterogeneity in patients with GH insensitivity syndrome suggests that partial defects exist in the GH receptor. Children with partial GH resistance would be expected to have short stature, elevated GH levels and relatively low levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. Provocation tests of the GH-IGF-I axis may help to identify such children. The IGF-I generation test in particular may demonstrate impaired secretion of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. This prospective study assesses the usefulness of the IGF-I generation test in the identification of short children with possible GH insensitivity. Prepubertal children referred for assessment of short stature underwent a standard GH provocation test followed by an IGF-I generation test. Thirty-seven prepubertal children (14 girls, 23 boys) with short stature (height < 2nd centile UK standards 1990) aged 4.5-12.6 years were investigated prospectively. Assessment included history, physical examination, auxological observations (height, weight, bone age). GH provocation tests (glucagon 15 micrograms/kg i.m. or insulin 0.15 U/kg/i.v.) was followed by an IGF-I generation test (hGH 0.1 iu/kg/s.c. daily for 4 days). GH was assayed during the provocation test. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured at 0900 h on day 0 and 4 of the IGF-I generation test. GH and IGF-I were measured by radioimmunoassay, IGFBP-3 by IRMA and basal GHBP by HPLC. Height SDS was calculated according to the UK Height Standards 1990. The absolute and percentage changes of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 during the IGF-I generation test were calculated. The 37 children were divided into three groups according to the peak GH level (mean +/- SEM) during the provocation test: Group 1 (peak GH < 20 mU/l) n = 11, five girls, six boys age 7.1 +/- 0.7 years, height SDS -2.5 +/- 0.1, peak GH 14.5 +/- 1.6 mU/l, IGF-I 92.0 +/- 10.4 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3 2.6 +/- 0.4 mg/l. Group 2 (peak GH 20-40 mU/l) n = 12, six girls, six boys age 8.6 +/- 0.7 years, height SDS -2.6 +/- 0.1, peak GH 28.4 +/- 1.6 mU/l, IGF-I 121-5 +/- 13.4 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3 2.9 +/- 0.2 mg/l. Group 3 (peak GH > 40 mU/l) n = 14, three girls, 11 boys, aged 8.5 +/- 0.6 years, height SDS -2.3 +/- 0.1, peak GH 60.7 +/- 4.1 mU/l, IGF-I 112.4 +/- 10.9 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3 3.1 +/- 0.3 mg/l. There were no significant differences in the absolute increases of IGF-I or IGFBP-3 (mean +/- SEM) during the IGF-I generation test, IGF-I; Group 1, 48.8 +/- 9.5 micrograms/l, Group 2, 42.7 +/- 4.8 micrograms/l. Group 3, 45.5 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3; Group 1, 1.1 +/- 1.2 mg/l. Group 2, 1.2 +/- 0.2 mg/l, Group 3, 0.85 +/- 0.1 mg/l. There were no significant differences in the percentage increases (mean +/- SEM) of IGF-I; Group 1, 55 +/- 9%, Group 2, 35 +/- 5%, Group 3, 42 +/- 8%, or IGFBP-3; Group 1, 64 +/- 17%, Group 2, 44 +/- 8%, Group 3.32 +/- 6%. GHBP values were normal in all three groups. In Group 3 (peak GH > 40 mU/l) four individual patients had either low basal IGF-I levels (n = 2) (< 5th centile of normal range for age) or low basal IGFBP-3 levels (n = 1) (< 5th centile of normal range for age) or low IGF-I responses in the IGF-I generation test (2 x CV of IGF-I assay) (n = 1). No single subject had all the characteristics of GH insensitivity syndrome. The responses during an IGF-I generation test did not identify a clear group of children with GH insensitivity. Individual patients had low basal IGF-I or IGFBP-3 values and a poor response in the generation test, features which, in the presence of high GH levels on provocation, are consistent with partial GH insensitivity.

Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Generation: An Index of Growth Hormone Insensitivity

GH insensitivity may be an inherited condition or may arise as a consequence of disease of malnutrition. Laron syndrome is the most severe form of GH insensitivity, arising from an absent or defective GH receptor. Less severe forms of GH insensitivity, however, may exist, resulting in short stature but in few other features of Laron syndrome. We have identified a heterogeneous group of children with short stature and either high basal (> 10 mU/L) or high peak GH levels (> 40 mU/L) on GH provocation testing, to examine biochemical markers of GH sensitivity. These children received 4 d of GH (0.1 U/kg) and the increment in IGF-I, IGF binding protein (BP)-3, and GHBP was determined. Eight GHD children, commencing GH therapy, were recruited as positive controls. The two groups could not be differentiated by age, height SDS (SD score), height velocity SDS, or body mass index. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation were correlated in all children (delta SDS IGF-I versus delta SDS IGFBP-3, r = 0.49, p = 0.03). Neither basal GHBP levels or the increment in GHBP were predictive of the IGF-I or IGFBP-3 response to GH. The GHI group had a significantly reduced IGFBP-3 response to stimulation with 4 d of GH (median percent increment in IGFBP-3, 26%, versus 72% in the GHD group, P = 0.03); their IGF-I response to GH was also reduced (median % increment in IGF-I 75% versus 144% in the GH deficient group), but this did not achieve significance, p = 0.06. In all children, the percentage rise or delta SDS in both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 inversely correlated with the GH peak obtained on provocation testing, the latter being the most significant determinant of GH peak. We propose that the "IGF generation test", in particular IGFBP-3 generation, can be used in the investigation of partial GH insensitivity. Further work, however, is required to establish diagnostic criteria for partial GH insensitivity.

Reproducibility and Comparison of Growth Hormone Secretion Tests

To assess the degree of reproducibility of spontaneous GH secretion and pharmacological tests we studied 15 prepubertal children with short stature and abnormal growth rate. In all children, spontaneous overnight GH secretion was measured followed by a clonidine test in 8 children and an arginine test in the remaining 7. The same protocol was repeated a week later. Intra-individual variability of GH secretion in both physiological and pharmacological tests was expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV%). No significant difference was found between the first and second value of parameters of spontaneous GH secretion. Maximum spontaneous GH peak (MS) and mean 12-h GH concentration (MGH) correlated significantly (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). Mean CV% of all parameters of repeated GH profiles (around 30%) were lower than those of provocative tests (around 70%) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between CV% of clonidine and arginine tests. There was no correlation between MGH or MS and GH response to provocative test in the same child. We found a significant correlation between the log transformed maximum provocative GH response to the arginine test and the length of the time interval (in min) from the end of the last GH peak in the previous profile to the time zero of the provocative test (r = 0.60, p < 0.05). This relationship was not found for the clonidine test. We conclude that spontaneous GH secretion in children with short stature is more reproducible than stimulated GH response with a week's difference. Perhaps the higher variability of provocative GH secretion may be related to the state of the endogenous hypothalamic rhythm of both GHRH and somatostatin release at the time of the test.