IntroductionDuring wound repair, fibroblasts secrete abundant extracellular matrix (ECM) components and participate in remodeling of the provisional ECM. Macrophages and other immune cells play a critical role in all stages of wound healing and are primarily responsible for directing ECM‐producing cells into the wound site to replace it with the new scar tissue. Classically activated macrophages, M1M□, contribute to inflammation early on, whereas alternatively activated macrophages, M2M□, secrete ECM‐degrading enzymes, including matrix metallopeptidases (MMPs), during resolution. Macrophages instruct fibroblast activities, largely via secreted factors. However, the differential effects of M1M□vs M2M□ on fibroblasts remains unknown. This study is designed to evaluate the various roles of differentially polarized macrophages through secreted factors on fibroblast activities that relate to wound resolution.MethodNaïve macrophages(M0) were differentiated into either M1M□ using IFN‐gamma and LPS, or M2M□ using IL‐4. To study the effects of secreted factors and cell‐contact dependent factors, we used indirect (condition media) and direct macrophages‐fibroblast co‐culture systems, respectively with and without TGFβ. Morphologic, phenotypic, and transcriptomic characterization, and cytokine analysis was performed. Cultures were also evaluated for relative gene expression of extracellular matrix genes (MMP8, MMP9, TIMP1, and TIMP2).ResultsWe have shown that M1M□ increases gene expression of matrix degrading enzymes, MMP8 and MMP9, while M2M□ enhanced fibroblast expression of matrix signaling proteins ERK, p38 and AKT. We further have shown that M1M□ highly expresses chemokine CXCL10, a known inhibitor of fibroblast matrix production. We use CXCR3−/− fibroblasts, as CXCR3 is the only known receptor of CXCL10, and treated the cells with both M1M□ vs M2M□ condition media. The fibroblasts showed no change in MMP8 gene expression. However, when we knocked out CXCR3 in M1M□ and cultured them with fibroblasts, fibroblast MMP8 and MM9 expression was diminished.ConclusionThese data suggest that macrophage‐induction of fibroblast expression of MMP8 and MM9 is independent of CXCR3 expression on fibroblasts, but requires the expression of CXCR3 on macrophages. These data points to complex macrophage‐fibroblast crosstalk coordination and the dependency in tissue repair.Support or Funding InformationFunding Source: American Society of Investigative Pathology‐ Summer Research Opportunity in Pathology Program (SROPP), and University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing supported by grants from NIAMS and NIGMS (AR68317 CCY), and support in kind from and the School of Nursing.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.