protein-DNA Adducts Research Articles

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 has major impact in prevention of suicidal covalent DNA-protein crosslink with apurinic/apyrimidinic site in cellular extracts.

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPC) are common DNA lesions induced by various external and endogenous agents. One of the sources of DPC is the apurinic/apyrimidinic site (AP site) and proteins interacting with it. Some proteins possessing AP lyase activity form covalent complexes with AP site-containing DNA without borohydride reduction (suicidal crosslinks). We have shown earlier that tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) but not AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) is able to remove intact OGG1 from protein-DNA adducts, whereas APE1 is able to prevent the formation of DPC by hydrolyzing the AP site. Here we demonstrate that TDP1 can remove intact PARP2 but not XRCC1 from covalent enzyme-DNA adducts with AP-DNA formed in the absence of APE1. We also analyzed an impact of APE1 and TDP1 on the efficiency of DPC formation in APE1-/- or TDP1-/- cell extracts. Our data revealed that APE1 depletion leads to increased levels of PARP1-DNA crosslinks, whereas TDP1 deficiency has little effect on DPC formation.

Transcription-coupled repair of DNA–protein cross-links depends on CSA and CSB

Covalent DNA–protein cross-links (DPCs) are toxic DNA lesions that block replication and require repair by multiple pathways. Whether transcription blockage contributes to the toxicity of DPCs and how cells respond when RNA polymerases stall at DPCs is unknown. Here we find that DPC formation arrests transcription and induces ubiquitylation and degradation of RNA polymerase II. Using genetic screens and a method for the genome-wide mapping of DNA–protein adducts, DPC sequencing, we discover that Cockayne syndrome (CS) proteins CSB and CSA provide resistance to DPC-inducing agents by promoting DPC repair in actively transcribed genes. Consequently, CSB- or CSA-deficient cells fail to efficiently restart transcription after induction of DPCs. In contrast, nucleotide excision repair factors that act downstream of CSB and CSA at ultraviolet light-induced DNA lesions are dispensable. Our study describes a transcription-coupled DPC repair pathway and suggests that defects in this pathway may contribute to the unique neurological features of CS.

Short-range end resection requires ATAD5-mediated PCNA unloading for faithful homologous recombination.

Homologous recombination (HR) requires bidirectional end resection initiated by a nick formed close to a DNA double-strand break (DSB), dysregulation favoring error-prone DNA end-joining pathways. Here we investigate the role of the ATAD5, a PCNA unloading protein, in short-range end resection, long-range resection not being affected by ATAD5 deficiency. Rapid PCNA loading onto DNA at DSB sites depends on the RFC PCNA loader complex and MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 nuclease complexes bound to CtIP. Based on our cytological analyses and on an in vitro system for short-range end resection, we propose that PCNA unloading by ATAD5 is required for the completion of short-range resection. Hampering PCNA unloading also leads to failure to remove the KU70/80 complex from the termini of DSBs hindering DNA repair synthesis and the completion of HR. In line with this model, ATAD5-depleted cells are defective for HR, show increased sensitivity to camptothecin, a drug forming protein-DNA adducts, and an augmented dependency on end-joining pathways. Our study highlights the importance of PCNA regulation at DSB for proper end resection and HR.

N-terminal domain of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase I regulates topoisomerase I-induced toxicity in cells

Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase I (Tdp1) hydrolyzes phosphodiester-linked adducts from both ends of DNA. This includes the topoisomerase I (TOP1)-DNA covalent reaction intermediate that is the target of the camptothecin class of chemotherapeutics. Tdp1 two-step catalysis is centered on the formation of a Tdp1-DNA covalent complex (Tdp1cc) using two catalytic histidines. Here, we examined the role of the understudied, structurally undefined, and poorly conserved N-terminal domain (NTD) of Tdp1 in context of full-length protein in its ability to remove TOP1cc in cells. Using toxic Tdp1 mutants, we observed that the NTD is critical for Tdp1’s ability to remove TOP1-DNA adducts in yeast. Full-length and N-terminal truncated Tdp1 mutants showed similar expression levels and cellular distribution yet an inversed TOP1-dependent toxicity. Single turnover catalysis was significantly different between full-length and truncated catalytic mutants but not wild-type enzyme, suggesting that Tdp1 mutants depend on the NTD for catalysis. These observations suggest that the NTD plays a critical role in the regulation of Tdp1 activity and interaction with protein-DNA adducts such as TOP1cc in cells. We propose that the NTD is a regulatory domain and coordinates stabilization of the DNA-adducted end within the catalytic pocket to access the phosphodiester linkage for hydrolysis.

Ubiquitin-directed AAA+ ATPase p97/VCP unfolds stable proteins crosslinked to DNA for proteolysis by SPRTN

The protease SPRTN degrades DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) that threaten genome stability. SPRTN has been connected to the ubiquitin-directed protein unfoldase p97 (also called VCP or Cdc48), but a functional cooperation has not been demonstrated directly. Here, we biochemically reconstituted p97-assisted proteolysis with purified proteins and showed that p97 targets ubiquitin-modified DPCs and unfolds them to prepare them for proteolysis by SPRTN. We demonstrate that purified SPRTN alone was unable to degrade a tightly-folded Eos fluorescent reporter protein even when Eos was crosslinked to DNA (Eos-DPC). However, when present, p97 unfolded poly-ubiquitinated Eos-DPC in a manner requiring its ubiquitin adapter, Ufd1-Npl4. Notably, we show that, in cooperation with p97 and Ufd1-Npl4, SPRTN proteolyzed unfolded Eos-DPC, which relied on recognition of the DNA-crosslink by SPRTN. In a simplified unfolding assay, we further demonstrate that p97, while unfolding a protein substrate, can surmount the obstacle of a DNA crosslink site in the substrate. Thus, our data demonstrate that p97, in conjunction with Ufd1-Npl4, assists SPRTN-mediated proteolysis of tightly-folded proteins crosslinked to DNA, even threading bulky protein-DNA adducts. These findings will be relevant for understanding how cells handle DPCs to ensure genome stability and for designing strategies that target p97 in combination cancer therapy.

Topoisomerase Assays.

Topoisomerases are enzymes that play essential roles in DNA replication, transcription, chromosome segregation, and recombination. All cells have two major forms of DNA topoisomerases: type I enzymes, which make single-stranded cuts in DNA, and type II enzymes, which cut and decatenate double-stranded DNA. DNA topoisomerases are important targets of approved and experimental anti-cancer agents. Provided in this article are protocols to assess activities of topoisomerases and their inhibitors. Included are an assay for topoisomerase I activity based on relaxation of supercoiled DNA; an assay for topoisomerase II based on the decatenation of double-stranded DNA; and approaches for enriching and quantifying DNA-protein covalent complexes formed as obligatory intermediates in the reactions of type I and II topoisomerases with DNA; and assays for measuring DNA cleavage in vitro. Topoisomerases are not the only proteins that form covalent adducts with DNA in living cells, and the approaches described here are likely to find use in characterizing other protein-DNA adducts and exploring their utility as targets for therapy. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Assay of topoisomerase I activity Basic Protocol 2: Assay of topoisomerase II activity Basic Protocol 3: In vivo determination of topoisomerase covalent complexes using the in vivo complex of enzyme (ICE) assay Support Protocol 1: Preparation of mouse tissue for determination of topoisomerase covalent complexes using the ICE assay Support Protocol 2: Using recombinant topoisomerase standard for absolute quantification of cellular TOP2CC Basic Protocol 4: Quantification of topoisomerase-DNA covalent complexes by RADAR/ELISA: The rapid approach to DNA adduct recovery (RADAR) combined with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Basic Protocol 5: Analysis of protein-DNA covalent complexes by RADAR/Western Support Protocol 3: Adduct-Seq to characterize adducted DNA Support Protocol 4: Nuclear fractionation and RNase treatment to reduce sample complexity Basic Protocol 6: Determination of DNA cleavage by purified topoisomerase I Basic Protocol 7: Determination of inhibitor effects on DNA cleavage by topoisomerase II using a plasmid linearization assay Alternate Protocol: Gel electrophoresis determination of topoisomerase II cleavage.

Common and Novel Markers for Measuring Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Ex Vivo in Research and Clinical Practice-Which to Use Regarding Disease Outcomes?

Many chronic conditions such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type-2 diabetes, obesity, peripheral/coronary artery disease and auto-immune diseases are associated with low-grade inflammation. Closely related to inflammation is oxidative stress (OS), which can be either causal or secondary to inflammation. While a low level of OS is physiological, chronically increased OS is deleterious. Therefore, valid biomarkers of these signalling pathways may enable detection and following progression of OS/inflammation as well as to evaluate treatment efficacy. Such biomarkers should be stable and obtainable through non-invasive methods and their determination should be affordable and easy. The most frequently used inflammatory markers include acute-phase proteins, essentially CRP, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen and procalcitonin, and cytokines, predominantly TNFα, interleukins 1β, 6, 8, 10 and 12 and their receptors and IFNγ. Some cytokines appear to be disease-specific. Conversely, OS—being ubiquitous—and its biomarkers appear less disease or tissue-specific. These include lipid peroxidation products, e.g., F2-isoprostanes and malondialdehyde, DNA breakdown products (e.g., 8-OH-dG), protein adducts (e.g., carbonylated proteins), or antioxidant status. More novel markers include also –omics related ones, as well as non-invasive, questionnaire-based measures, such as the dietary inflammatory-index (DII), but their link to biological responses may be variable. Nevertheless, many of these markers have been clearly related to a number of diseases. However, their use in clinical practice is often limited, due to lacking analytical or clinical validation, or technical challenges. In this review, we strive to highlight frequently employed and useful markers of inflammation-related OS, including novel promising markers.

DNA Repair Targeted Therapy

The repair of DNA harm could be a complex prepare that depends on specific pathways to cure particular sorts of harm to DNA. The run of insuperable to DNA incorporates little, humble changes in structure counting jumbled bases and straightforward methylation occasions to oxidized bases, intra- and interstrand DNA crosslinks, DNA twofold strand breaks and protein-DNA adducts. Pathways required for the repair of these injuries incorporate jumble repair, base extraction repair, nucleotide extraction repair, and the homology coordinated repair/Fanconi frailty pathway. Each of these pathways contributes to hereditary steadiness, and transformations in qualities encoding proteins included in these pathways have been illustrated to advance hereditary insecurity and cancer. In truth, it has been proposed all cancers show abandons in DNA repair. It has too been illustrated that the capacity of cancer cells to repair restoratively actuated DNA harm impacts helpful adequacy. This has driven to focusing on DNA repair pathways and proteins to create anti-cancer specialists that will increment affectability to conventional chemotherapeutics. Whereas beginning ponders mulled and were tormented by a need of specificity and a characterized instrument of activity, more later approaches to misuse engineered deadly interaction and create tall liking chemical inhibitors have demonstrated impressively more viable. In this audit we are going highlight later propels and talk about past disappointments in focusing on DNA repair to clear the way for future DNA repair focused on operators and their utilize in cancer treatment.

Treatment of human cells with 5-aza-dC induces formation of PARP1-DNA covalent adducts at genomic regions targeted by DNMT1

The nucleoside analog 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) is used to treat some hematopoietic malignancies. The mechanism of cell killing depends upon DNMT1, but is otherwise not clearly defined. Here we show that PARP1 forms covalent DNA adducts in human lymphoblast or fibroblasts treated with 5-aza-dC. Some adducts recovered from 5-aza-dC-treated cells have undergone cleavage by apoptotic caspases 3/7. Mapping of PARP1-DNA adducts, by a new method, “Adduct-Seq”, demonstrates adduct enrichment at CpG-dense genomic locations that are targets of maintenance methylation by DNMT1. Covalent protein-DNA adducts can arrest replication and induce apoptosis, and these results raise the possibility that induction of PARP1-DNA adducts may contribute to cell killing in response to treatment with 5-aza-dC.

Abstract 4043: SYD985 synergy with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in human tumor cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs)

Abstract SYD985 is a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a cleavable linker and the prodrug seco-DUBA which, upon release, spontaneously rearranges to form the active toxin DUBA. DUBA covalently binds adenine in the DNA resulting in DNA damage, cell cycle perturbation and associated cytotoxicity. SYD985 induces dose-dependent cytotoxicity of human tumor cell lines and PDXs expressing HER2 on the outer cell membrane. The cytotoxicity of PARPi depends on PARP trapping, i.e. the formation of non-covalent protein-DNA adducts composed of inhibited PARP1 bound to DNA lesions of clear1 and unclear origins2,3. We investigated potential synergy in cytotoxic activity of SYD985 and the PARPi niraparib and olaparib towards HER2-expressing tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Tumor cell lines were from breast (BT-474, AU-565, UACC-893) or ovarian (TOV-112D, NIH:OVCAR-3) origin. Cytotoxicity was established by measuring DNA content and metabolic activity of living cells. For both PARPi the highest non-cytotoxic concentration for each cell line was established. This concentration was used to measure the potential potency shift of the SYD985 concentration-response curve by comparing SYD985 IC50 values in the absence and presence of PARPi. PARPi-induced fold change in IC50 for SYD985 was established in two independent experiments (N=2, n=3). Niraparib, dosed at a non-cytotoxic concentration, induced a 1.5 to 136-fold potentiation of SYD985-induced tumor cell killing. In BT-474 cells, niraparib co-treatment unveils a biphasic concentration-response curve to SYD985. This is in line with the fact that BT-474 cells express high levels of HER2 and are known to respond to naked trastuzumab at concentrations slightly above those of SYD985. Olaparib, dosed at a non-cytotoxic concentration, induced a 0.4 to 7.5-fold potentiation of SYD985-induced tumor cell killing. In a breast cancer PDX mouse clinical trial in immunodeficient mice that lack carboxylesterase 1c (Ces1c) we studied the combination of SYD985 (1 mg/kg, IV, SD) and niraparib or olaparib (50 mg/kg Q1DX21, IP). In order to detect potential additive and/or synergistic effects of SYD985 and PARPi, a suboptimal dose of SYD985 (1 mg/kg) was selected. PARPi doses were chosen known to inhibit growth of tumors with a defective DNA repair mechanism4. Data clearly show that the combination of SYD985 and PARPi are more effective in tumor volume reduction than either monotherapy alone. In conclusion, niraparib and olaparib act in synergy with SYD985 in killing human HER2-expressing tumor cells in vitro, both in high HER2 (BT-474, AU-565, UACC-893) and low HER2 (NIH:OVCAR-3; TOV-112D) expressing cells. In vivo such synergistic activity appears to translate in improved tumor growth inhibition of various breast cancer PDX models. 1Zimmermann M, Nature 559, 2018; 2Pommier Y, Sci Transl Med 8, 2016; 3Lord C, Science 355, 2017; 4Henneman L, PNAS 112, 2015 Citation Format: Wim H. Dokter, Fred A. Dijcks, Patrick G. Groothuis, Ellen Mattaar, Eline Loosveld, Daniëlle Jacobs, Monique van der Vleuten, Jan H. Schellens, Miranda van der Lee. SYD985 synergy with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in human tumor cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4043.

Identification of Relaxase-DNA Covalent Complexes and DNA Strand Transfer Reaction Products by Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis.

Relaxases are essential proteins for plasmid conjugation. They process the DNA to be transferred by means of a covalent intermediate. Thus, the characterization of these covalent complexes is essential to understand the biological role of this reaction and to improve it for biotechnological applications. In this article, we describe the use of the polyacrylamide electrophoresis techniques for the identification of relaxase-DNA covalent complexes, being SDS-PAGE a simple and reliable method for the detection of protein-DNA covalent adducts. Relaxases also perform a strand transfer reaction to recircularize the DNA and finish the DNA transfer process in the recipient cell. Urea-PAGE allows us the analysis of oligonucleotides generated by the strand transfer reaction. These methods could also be used for the analysis of other HUH endonucleases.

CRISPR screens identify genomic ribonucleotides as a source of PARP-trapping lesions.

SummaryThe observation that BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells are sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors spurred their development into cancer therapies that target homologous recombination (HR) deficiency1. The cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitors depends on PARP trapping, the formation of non-covalent protein-DNA adducts composed of inhibited PARP1 bound to DNA lesions of unclear origins1–4. To address the nature of such lesions and the cellular consequences of PARP trapping, we undertook three CRISPR screens to identify genes and pathways that mediate cellular resistance to olaparib, a clinically approved PARP inhibitor1. Here were present a high-confidence set of 73 genes whose mutation causes increased PARP inhibitor sensitivity. In addition to an expected enrichment for HR-related genes, we discovered that mutation in all three genes encoding RNase H2 sensitized cells to PARP inhibition. We establish that the underlying cause of the PARP inhibitor hypersensitivity of RNase H2-deficient cells is impaired ribonucleotide excision repair (RER)5. Embedded ribonucleotides, abundant in the genome of RER-deficient cells, are substrates for topoisomerase 1 cleavage, resulting in PARP-trapping lesions that impede DNA replication and endanger genome integrity. We conclude that genomic ribonucleotides are a hitherto unappreciated source of PARP-trapping DNA lesions, and that the frequent deletion of RNASEH2B in metastatic prostate cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia could provide an opportunity to exploit these findings therapeutically.

The uracil‐DNA glycosylase homolog UdgX from M. smegmatis as a potential platform for in vitro protein evolution

A uracil‐DNA glycosylase (UDG) homolog from Mycobacterium smegmatis, UdgX, has been reported to lack uracil excision activity but instead binds uracil‐containing DNA tightly even under denaturing conditions, implying a covalent protein‐DNA adduct (Sang et al., “A unique uracil‐DNA binding protein of the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily” NAR 43, 8452–63, 2015). To determine whether UdgX could be used as a fusion partner to tether a protein library to its encoding DNA as a platform for in vitro protein evolution, we expressed, purified, and characterized UdgX for its uracil‐binding activity. As expected, UdgX exhibits specific complex formation with uracil‐containing single stranded and double stranded DNA substrates by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), but only in the absence of SDS. This implies that the UdgX‐DNA interaction is non‐covalent, contradicting the earlier report. Further work will be necessary to determine whether the noncovalent UdgX‐DNA interaction is sufficiently strong to stably tether a protein library to its encoding DNA.Support or Funding InformationNew England Biolabs Inc.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Exposure to ambient particulate matter induces oxidative stress in lung and aorta in a size- and time-dependent manner in rats

Exposure to particulate matter (PM) has been implicated in oxidative stress (OxS) and inflammation as underlying mechanisms of lung damage and cardiovascular alterations. PM is a chemical mixture that can be subdivided according to their aerodynamic size into coarse (CP), fine (FP), and ultrafine (UFP) particulates. We investigated, in a rat model, the induction of OxS (protein oxidation and antioxidant response), carcinogen-DNA adduct formation, and inflammatory mediators in lung in response to different airborne particulate fractions, CP, FP, and UFP, after an acute and subchronic exposure. In addition, OxS was evaluated in the aorta to assess the effects beyond the lungs. Exposure to CP, FP, and UFP induced time- and size-dependent lung protein oxidation and DNA adduct formation. After acute and subchronic exposure, nuclear factor erythroid-2 (Nrf2) activation was observed in the lung, by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and the induction of mRNA antioxidant enzymes in the FP and UFP groups, but not in the CP. Cytokine concentration of interleukin 1β, interleukin 6, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 was significantly increased in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after acute exposure to FP and UFP. Activation of Nrf2 and expression of mRNA antioxidant enzymes were observed only after the subchronic exposure to FP and UFP in the aorta. Our results indicate that FP and UFP were mainly accountable for the oxidant toxic effects in the lung; OxS is spread from the lung to the cardiovascular system. We conclude that the biological mechanisms associated with transient OxS and inflammation are particle size and time-dependent exposure resulting in acute lung injury, which later reaches the vascular system.

Structural basis of a histidine-DNA nicking/joining mechanism for gene transfer and promiscuous spread of antibiotic resistance

Relaxases are metal-dependent nucleases that break and join DNA for the initiation and completion of conjugative bacterial gene transfer. Conjugation is the main process through which antibiotic resistance spreads among bacteria, with multidrug-resistant staphylococci and streptococci infections posing major threats to human health. The MOBV family of relaxases accounts for approximately 85% of all relaxases found in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Here, we present six structures of the MOBV relaxase MobM from the promiscuous plasmid pMV158 in complex with several origin of transfer DNA fragments. A combined structural, biochemical, and computational approach reveals that MobM follows a previously uncharacterized histidine/metal-dependent DNA processing mechanism, which involves the formation of a covalent phosphoramidate histidine-DNA adduct for cell-to-cell transfer. We discuss how the chemical features of the high-energy phosphorus-nitrogen bond shape the dominant position of MOBV histidine relaxases among small promiscuous plasmids and their preference toward Gram-positive bacteria.

Abstract 501: Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase I cellular function dependent on its N-terminal residues

Abstract Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase I (Tdp1) is a highly conserved eukaryotic DNA repair enzyme that catalyzes the resolution of 3’ and 5’ phospho-DNA adducts. Tdp1 has been implicated in the repair of DNA topoisomerase I (Top1)-DNA covalent complexes reversibly stabilized by FDA approved camptothecins (CPTs) derivatives topotecan and irinotecan. Tdp1 activity relies on two catalytic histidines that function as a nucleophile and an acid-base residue. A mutation of the acid-base His to Arg (H493R) in human Tdp1 is associated with the rare recessive ataxia SCAN1. We defined alternative substitution of either catalytic histidine that induce cytotoxicity, reduce catalytic activity and enhances the requisite Tdp1-DNA covalent adduct lifetime in the cell. The phenotypes of the catalytic mutants provide excellent tools to study Tdp1 cellular function. Biochemical studies revealed that Tdp1 catalysis in vitro is independent of the N-terminal domain. Among Tdp1 proteins, the N-terminal domain is poorly conserved in sequence and size (79aa for yeast and 148aa for human Tdp1). Conversely, the N-terminal domain regulates the in vitro activity of these Tdp1 mutants. Additionally, we investigated the role of the N-terminal domain for Tdp1 activity in the yeast and human cell models. Expression of N-terminal truncated proteins showed similar cellular distribution as the full-length proteins. However, these N-terminal truncated Tdp1 mutants did not display the toxicity that was observed with the full-length Tdp1 mutant proteins. Our data suggests that the N-terminal domain is required to resolve protein-DNA covalent complexes, such as Top1. Indeed, preliminary results suggest that this domain is also critical to process Top2-DNA covalent complexes, but only in the presences of etoposide. We are currently investigating other protein-DNA adducts that are resolved by Tdp1. These results suggests that the N-terminal domain is a critical determinate of Tdp1 cellular function. However, further studies are necessary to ensure that these constructs are properly distributed and retain their catalytic activity. Additionally, the N-terminal domain of human Tdp1 is post-translational modified, while our preliminary results suggest that this domain is important for protein-protein interaction and Tdp1 recruitment to its substrates. Understanding Tdp1 substrate and protein-interactions are important in the development of Tdp1 as therapeutic target. This work is in part supported by the ADDA, UAB Cancer Comprehensive Center (P30CA013148), ACS-IRG-60-001-53, DOD OCRP (W81XWH-15-1-0198). Citation Format: Selma M. Cuya, Robert C.A.M. Van Waardenburg. Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase I cellular function dependent on its N-terminal residues [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 501. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-501

Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts

The human Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (hMRN) complex is critical for the sensing, processing, and signaling of DNA double-strand breaks. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is essential for mammalian development and cell viability, although the regulation and substrate specificity of Mre11 have been difficult to define. Here we show that hMRN catalyzes sequential endonucleolytic and exonucleolytic activities on both 5' and 3' strands of DNA ends containing protein adducts, and that Nbs1, ATP, and adducts are essential for this function. In contrast, Nbs1 inhibits Mre11/Rad50-catalyzed 3'-to-5' exonucleolytic degradation of clean DNA ends. The hMRN endonucleolytic cleavage events are further stimulated by the phosphorylated form of the human C-terminal binding protein-interacting protein (CtIP) DNA repair enzyme, establishing a role for CtIP in regulating hMRN activity. These results illuminate the important role of Nbs1 and CtIP in determining the substrates and consequences of human Mre11/Rad50 nuclease activities on protein-DNA lesions.

Depletion of tyrosyl DNA phosphodiesterase 2 activity enhances etoposide-mediated double-strand break formation and cell killing.

DNA topoisomerase 2 (Top2) poisons, including common anticancer drugs etoposide and doxorubicin kill cancer cells by stabilizing covalent Top2-tyrosyl-DNA 5'-phosphodiester adducts and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Proteolytic degradation of the covalently attached Top2 leaves a 5'-tyrosylated blocked termini which is removed by tyrosyl DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2), prior to DSB repair through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Thus, TDP2 confers resistance of tumor cells to Top2-poisons by repairing such covalent DNA-protein adducts, and its pharmacological inhibition could enhance the efficacy of Top2-poisons. We discovered NSC111041, a selective inhibitor of TDP2, by optimizing a high throughput screening (HTS) assay for TDP2's 5'-tyrosyl phosphodiesterase activity and subsequent validation studies. We found that NSC111041 inhibits TDP2's binding to DNA without getting intercalated into DNA and enhanced etoposide's cytotoxicity synergistically in TDP2-expressing cells but not in TDP2 depleted cells. Furthermore, NSC111041 enhanced formation of etoposide-induced γ-H2AX foci presumably by affecting DSB repair. Immuno-histochemical analysis showed higher TDP2 expression in a sub-set of different type of tumor tissues. These findings underscore the feasibility of clinical use of suitable TDP2 inhibitors in adjuvant therapy with Top2-poisons for a sub-set of cancer patients with high TDP2 expression.

DNA repair targeted therapy: The past or future of cancer treatment?

The repair of DNA damage is a complex process that relies on particular pathways to remedy specific types of damage to DNA. The range of insults to DNA includes small, modest changes in structure including mismatched bases and simple methylation events to oxidized bases, intra- and interstrand DNA crosslinks, DNA double strand breaks and protein-DNA adducts. Pathways required for the repair of these lesions include mismatch repair, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and the homology directed repair/Fanconi anemia pathway. Each of these pathways contributes to genetic stability, and mutations in genes encoding proteins involved in these pathways have been demonstrated to promote genetic instability and cancer. In fact, it has been suggested that all cancers display defects in DNA repair. It has also been demonstrated that the ability of cancer cells to repair therapeutically induced DNA damage impacts therapeutic efficacy. This has led to targeting DNA repair pathways and proteins to develop anti-cancer agents that will increase sensitivity to traditional chemotherapeutics. While initial studies languished and were plagued by a lack of specificity and a defined mechanism of action, more recent approaches to exploit synthetic lethal interaction and develop high affinity chemical inhibitors have proven considerably more effective. In this review we will highlight recent advances and discuss previous failures in targeting DNA repair to pave the way for future DNA repair targeted agents and their use in cancer therapy.

MRN, CtIP, and BRCA1 mediate repair of topoisomerase II-DNA adducts.

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) with complex ends poses a special challenge, as additional processing is required before DNA ligation. For example, protein-DNA adducts must be removed to allow repair by either nonhomologous end joining or homology-directed repair. Here, we investigated the processing of topoisomerase II (Top2)-DNA adducts induced by treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide. Through biochemical analysis in Xenopus laevis egg extracts, we establish that the MRN (Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1) complex, CtIP, and BRCA1 are required for both the removal of Top2-DNA adducts and the subsequent resection of Top2-adducted DSB ends. Moreover, the interaction between CtIP and BRCA1, although dispensable for resection of endonuclease-generated DSB ends, is required for resection of Top2-adducted DSBs, as well as for cellular resistance to etoposide during genomic DNA replication.