Protective Effect Of Light Research Articles

Unbiased, comprehensive analysis of Japanese health checkup data reveals a protective effect of light to moderate alcohol consumption on lung function

The overall effect of lifestyle habits, such as alcohol consumption, on general health remains controversial and it is important to clarify how such habits affect aging-related health impairments. To discover novel impacts of lifestyle on general health, we employed a mathematical approach to perform a comprehensive, unbiased, cross-sectional analysis of data from 6036 subjects who participated in a Japanese health checkup. Notably, we found that moderate alcohol consumption was positively correlated with lung function, muscle mass, and strength. Health checkup data were collected periodically from the same subjects. These people were light to moderate drinkers who had high health awareness and were basically free of major underlying diseases. We next analyzed 5 years of data from 1765 of these subjects. We found that higher baseline alcohol consumption, as well as increased alcohol intake over 5 years attenuated time-related deterioration of forced vital capacity without affecting total lung volume. This effect was independent of smoking. Our study suggests a possible protective effect of moderate amounts of alcohol on lung function, due to increased muscle mass/strength and forced vital capacity.

Deficiency of CD40 Reveals an Important Role for LIGHT in Anti-Leishmania Immunity.

We previously showed that LIGHT and its receptor herpes virus entry mediator (HVEM) are important for development of optimal CD4(+) Th1 cell immunity and resistance to primary Leishmania major infection in mice. In this study, we further characterized the contributions of this molecule in dendritic cell (DC) maturation, initiation, and maintenance of primary immunity and secondary anti-Leishmania immunity. Flow-cytometric studies showed that CD8α(+) DC subset was mostly affected by HVEM-Ig and lymphotoxin β receptor-Ig treatment. LIGHT signaling is required at both the priming and the maintenance stages of primary anti-Leishmania immunity but is completely dispensable during secondary immunity in wild type mice. However, LIGHT blockade led to impaired IL-12 and IFN-γ responses and loss of resistance in healed CD40-deficient mice after L. major challenge. The protective effect of LIGHT was mediated primarily via its interaction with lymphotoxin β receptor on CD8α(+) DCs. Collectively, our results show that although LIGHT is critical for maintenance of primary Th1 response, it is dispensable during secondary anti-Leishmania immunity in the presence of functional CD40 signaling as seen in wild type mice.

The Effect of Bright Light on Lens Compensation in Chicks

It has been shown that sunlight or bright indoor light can inhibit the development of deprivation myopia in chicks. It remains unclear whether light merely acts on deprivation myopia or, more generally, modulates the rate of emmetropization and its set point. This study was conducted to test how bright light interacts with compensation for imposed optical defocus. Furthermore, a dopamine antagonist was applied to test whether the protective effect of light is mediated by dopamine. Experiment A: Chicks monocularly wore either -7 or +7 D lenses for a period of 5 days, either under normal laboratory illuminance (500 lux, n = 12 and 16, respectively) or under high ambient illuminance (15,000 lux, n = 12 and 16). Experiment B: Chicks wore diffusers for a period of 4 days, either under normal laboratory illuminance (500 lux, n = 9) or high ambient illuminance (15,000 lux), with the bright-light group intravitreally injected daily with either the dopamine D(2) antagonist spiperone (500 μM, n = 9) or a vehicle solution (0.1% ascorbic acid, n = 9), with an untreated group serving as the control (n = 6). Axial length and refraction were measured at the commencement and cessation of all treatments. Exposure to high illuminances (15,000 lux) for 5 hours per day significantly slowed compensation for negative lenses, compared with that seen under 500 lux, although full compensation was still achieved. Compensation for positive lenses was accelerated by exposure to high illuminances but, again, the end point refraction was unchanged, compared with that of the 500-lux group. High illuminance also reduced deprivation myopia by roughly 60%, compared with that seen under 500 lux. This protective effect was abolished, however, by the daily injection of spiperone, but was unaffected by the injection of a vehicle solution. High illuminance levels reduce the rate of compensation for negative lenses and enhance the rate for positive lenses, but do not change the set point of emmetropization (target refraction). The retardation of myopia development by light is partially mediated by dopamine, as the injection of a dopamine antagonist abolishes the protective effect of light, at least in the case of deprivation myopia.

Protective and injuring action of visible light on photosynthetic apparatus in wheat plants during hyperthermia treatment

Illumination of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaves during heat treatment produced either additional injury or protection of photosynthetic apparatus depending on irradiance and the heating dose. Furthermore, illumination of leaves during hyperthermia exerted differential impacts on thermal tolerances of photosynthesis and photosystem II-driven electron transport assessed from the reduction of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCPIP). Measurements with infrared gas analyzer showed that mild heating of leaves in darkness (10 min at 38–40°C) had stronger inhibitory effect on CO2 uptake than heating of leaves exposed to low and moderate complex irradiances (3–30 klx), as well as excessive irradiance (75–100 klx). When the leaves were heated at higher temperatures (42–44°C), the low and moderate irradiances had a protective action, while high-intensity light aggravated the inhibition of photosynthesis. Illumination of leaves with weak light during heat treatment mitigated the impairment of chloroplast ultrastructure, whereas irradiation with high-intensity light (100 klx) destroyed the sensitive population of chloroplasts. The heat-stimulated photoinhibition was stronger for leaf photosynthesis than for DCPIP reduction in chloroplasts isolated from heat-treated leaves. No correlation was observed between the extent of violaxanthin deepoxidation, zeaxanthin accumulation, and the protective effect of light on photosynthetic apparatus during heat treatments.

The Effect of Smoking on the Relationship between Alcohol Consumption and All-Cause Mortality in Canadian Women

The protective effect of light to moderate drinking on all-cause mortality in general is well established, but there have been questions on its generalizability to women and non-smokers. The present study addresses these questions with a large cohort of Canadian middle-aged women. The key findings indicate that light to moderate drinkers have a markedly lower risk of mortality compared with current abstainers and that this effect is independent of smoking status. Part of this effect may be due to ex-drinkers who are part of the current abstainers group. Heavy drinkers have a higher mortality risk than light to moderate drinkers.

Alcohol, smoking and lung disease

Alcohol and smoking are two well-known health hazards. Alcohol and tobacco consumption are strongly correlated and heavy drinkers have more trouble quitting smoking than do light drinkers. Death from tobacco-related causes was more common than alcohol-related death in a follow-up study on patients admitted to an addiction programme for treatment of alcoholism and non-nicotine drug dependence. In British male doctors in the middle and elderly age group, a protective effect of light and moderate alcohol consumption (1-3 British units of alcohol per day) compared with abstinence has been shown in one large survey. This protective effect was shown in overall mortality as well as in mortality from respiratory disease. Higher alcohol intakes were associated with an increase in mortality. This characteristic U-formed, or J-formed, dose-response curve has been found in most studies with an apparent beneficial effect of modest alcohol intake and a harmful effect of high intakes. The anti-inflammatory effect of alcohol has been considered to be responsible for its limited protective effect on smoking-related lung function decline. Recently, a hitherto unconfirmed report suggests that the beneficial effect of alcohol on lung function in men is restricted to subjects with Lewis-negative blood group (10% of the Caucasian population). On the other hand, the protective effect in those individuals is large enough to be clinically relevant. Prospective investigations including both men and women are needed to elucidate which individuals have a protective effect of light and moderate alcohol intake. The major deleterious effect of smoking, including passive smoking, must be kept in mind-drinking alcohol surrounded by cigarette smoke might not be beneficial for respiratory health.