Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

New Applications of the Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postoperative Radiotherapy.

Several studies have reported preliminary experiences with the anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) flap for treating partial breast defects or breast implant exposure following reconstruction. As radiotherapy is commonly administered for breast cancer, some patients may present with heavily damaged skin flaps and chronic radiodermatitis. We describe new applications of a de-epithelialized AICAP flap, used in combination with an implant, for breast reconstruction when other treatment options are unavailable. A retrospective study was conducted, including all patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction with the aid of an AICAP flap. A literature review was also performed. Between November 2022 and August 2023, four pedicled AICAP flaps were harvested in four patients. The indications were breast implant coverage in cases of chronic dermatitis of the mastectomy skin flaps (two unilateral flaps) and inferolateral coverage of partially submuscular expanders for immediate breast reconstruction (two unilateral flaps). All four flaps were based on one perforator. The mean harvesting time was 40 minutes. Complete flap survival was achieved, with no complications at the donor site. The AICAP flap is a safe and reliable technique for difficult cases of breast reconstruction when no other options are available. Moreover, this technique can easily provide additional coverage for the breast implant when needed.

Association of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Postoperative Outcomes in Immediate Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by total mastectomy and immediate reconstruction has become an important strategy in the treatment of breast cancer. Although the safety of subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with NACT has been extensively evaluated, the safety in prepectoral reconstruction has not been clearly elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the association of NACT with immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction outcomes. A retrospective review of patients who underwent total mastectomy and immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction between May and December 2021 was conducted. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those receiving NACT and those not receiving it. Postoperative complication rates were compared between the 2 groups. The independent association between NACT and the complication profiles was evaluated. Propensity score matching was also conducted. We analyzed 343 cases, including 85 who received NACT treatment and 258 who did not. Compared with the non-NACT group, the NACT group was younger, had a higher body mass index, and a higher rate of adjuvant radiotherapy. There were no differences in the rates of overall complications or type of complication between the 2 groups. In the multivariable logistic analyses, NACT did not show a significant association with the development of adverse outcomes. Similar results were observed in propensity score matching analyses. Our results suggest that receiving NACT may not have a significant detrimental effect on the postoperative outcomes of immediate prepectoral prosthetic reconstructions. Conducting prepectoral implant-based reconstruction in the setting of NACT might be safe and provide acceptable outcomes.

A Comparison of Capsular Contracture Rates after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM Versus Synthetic Mesh

Abstract Goals/Purpose Capsular contracture is a local complication in which there is tightening of the capsule around the implant. This complication has been shown to occur in 15-30% of implant-based breast reconstruction patients and often requires revision surgery for correction. Prior investigations have suggested that the use of ADM can reduce the risk for development of capsular contracture, with more recent research suggesting that synthetic mesh may provide the same benefit. Several meta-analyses have attempted to compare ADM and mesh use for the prevention of capsular contracture, but they all emphasize the continued need for clinical investigation with direct comparisons. The goal of this study is to assess our own reconstruction patient population to compare capsular contracture rates between ADM and mesh cohorts, as well as to assess for other potential risks that may increase the rate of capsular contracture in these patients. Methods/Technique A 15-year retrospective review of all implant-based breast reconstructions performed by the senior author was performed. All operations occurred between 2008 and 2023 in a hospital setting. Patient demographics were assessed including age, BMI, implant size, radiation history, location of malposition, and use of either ADM or mesh. Post-operative complications including incidence of capsular contracture were recorded. Patients who had documented capsular contracture prior to scaffold insertion were excluded from the study. Wilcoxon signed rank test, 2-sided t-test, and Fischer’s Exact test were used to compare baseline demographics and capsular contracture rates between the two groups, along with a multivariate logistic regression analysis to control for potential confounders. Results/Complications Fifty-two breasts underwent capsulorraphy, of which 25 (48.1%) used ADM and 27 (51.9%) used mesh. Average age was 50.6 years, average BMI was 27.7, average implant size was 541.8 cc, and eight breasts (15.4%) had been irradiated. Average follow-up time was seven years (mean = 85.4 months, range 22 – 149 months, SD = 35.9). Fourteen (26.9%) capsulorraphies were for inferior malposition, 13 (25.0%) for lateral malposition, and 25 (48.1%) were for inferolateral malposition. Patients in the ADM group had significantly more lateral malposition prior to insertion as compared to the mesh group which had more inferior malposition (p=0.0246). There was no significant difference between the two groups for any other recorded baseline demographic; these demographics included age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, history of tobacco use, radiation, chemotherapy, implant volume, and implant surface texture. Capsular contracture occurred in 2 ADM breasts (8.0%) and 4 mesh breasts (14.8%) with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.6695). Five of these capsular contractures had documented Baker grades with three grade II, one grade III, and one grade IV. None of the recorded baseline demographics significantly increased the risk for capsular contracture development. Conclusion ADM and synthetic mesh both function as effective tools for reducing the risk of developing capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. The rate of capsular contracture with ADM was only 8.0% and the rate with mesh was only 14.8%. Both rates are lower than the 15-30% incidence that has been found in breast reconstruction patients without mesh. None of the patient demographics were significant risk factors for capsular contracture development, so these are unlikely to be confounders. There was no significant difference in rate of capsular contracture between the two groups, suggesting that ADM and mesh are similarly efficacious at preventing capsular contracture in reconstruction patients.

Microbiologic Profile of Nipple Swab Culture and its Association With Postoperative Complications in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

In breast surgeries, a lactiferous duct leading to lactic glands of breast parenchyma allows direct contamination by normal bacterial flora of the nipple-areola complex. Complete blockage of nipple flora from the intraoperative field is almost impossible. We aimed to analyze the microbiological profile of nipple flora of breast cancer patients who underwent an implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after a total mastectomy, and to evaluate the association of nipple bacterial flora with postoperative complications. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent an implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after a total mastectomy. A nipple swab culture was performed preoperatively. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and complications were compared between positive and negative nipple swab culture groups. Microbiological profile data including antibacterial resistance were collected. Among 128 breasts, 60 cases (46.9%) had positive preoperative nipple swab culture results. Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for 41.4% of microorganisms isolated. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of postoperative complications revealed that the presence of nipple bacterial flora was a risk factor for capsular contracture. Seven cases of postoperative infection were analyzed. In 2 cases (40% of pathogen-proven infection), the causative pathogen matched the patient's nipple bacterial flora, which was methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis in both cases. Nipple bacterial flora was associated with an increased risk of capsular contracture. Preoperative analysis of nipple bacterial flora can be an informative source for treating clinically diagnosed postoperative infections. More studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of active antibiotic decolonization of the nipple.

Impact of mastectomy flap necrosis on prepectoral reconstructive outcomes

IntroductionAs reconstructive surgeons have increasingly transitioned to the pre-pectoral plane for prosthetic breast reconstruction, the implications of mastectomy skin flap necrosis have become more concerning. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of skin flap necrosis on reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing immediate pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing immediate two-stage pre-pectoral reconstruction at a single center with at least 3-month follow-up. Postoperative complication, reconstructive outcome, and time to final implant were compared between patients with and without mastectomy skin necrosis. ResultsA total of 301 patients underwent 509 pre-pectoral breast reconstructions. Forty-four patients (14.6%) experienced postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Demographic and reconstructive characteristics were similar between the necrosis and no necrosis cohorts. Patients with skin necrosis were more likely to undergo reoperation after tissue expander (64% vs 19%, p<0.01) and undergo expander replacement (13.6% vs 3.5%, p=0.02). However, rates of reconstructive failure (6.8% vs 6.2%), major infection (9.1% vs 9.0%), and minor infection (13.6% vs 17.5%) after expander placement were statistically similar. Patients with skin necrosis trended towards longer time before final implant placement, though not statistically significant (6.5 vs 5.0 months, p=0.08). There was no difference in complication rates between the necrosis and no necrosis cohort after final implant placement. There was a higher rate of revision surgery after implant placement in the necrosis cohort (12.5% vs 4.1%, p=0.047). ConclusionMastectomy skin flap necrosis is a concerning postoperative event, particularly in patients with pre-pectoral prostheses. We observed that patients with skin necrosis experience higher reoperation rates in the expander period, yet have similar infection rates and achieve similar final reconstructive outcomes compared to patients without necrosis.

Efficacy and safety of intercostal nerve anastomosis in immediate subpectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy: a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical study.

This aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of intercostal nerve anastomosis among breast cancer patients who undergo immediate subpectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy. From 2022 to 2023, female patients between the ages of 20 and 60 diagnosed with stage I-IIIA breast cancer, who required and were willing to undergo immediate subpectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy, were screened and assigned to take the operation with (treatment group) or without (control group) intercostal nerve anastomosis (the nerves with appropriate length and thickness were selected from the 2nd-4th intercostal nerves, which were then dissociated and anastomosed to the posterior areola tissue). A radial incision at the surface projection of the tumor location was used. The patients' breast local sensation was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments before the operation as well as at 10 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, the patients' quality of life was evaluated 6 months postoperatively using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Adverse events, operation duration, drainage volume, and the duration of drainage tube carrying time were also monitored and recorded. Compared to the pre-operative period, a significant decrease in local sensation was observed 10 days after surgery in both groups. However, the control group showed a significant reduction in sensation at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, while the treatment group showed noticeable recovery. A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in local sensation between the pre-operative and post-operative periods was observed at the final follow-up in the two groups. By the time of 3 and 6 months postoperatively, a significant difference was seen in the local sensation between the two groups. Intercostal nerve anastomosis was found to significantly improve the patients' quality of life, including emotional (P = 0.01), physical (P = 0.04), and social functioning (P = 0.02) and pain (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in general characteristics (such as age, BMI, and subtypes). Although intercostal nerve anastomosis increased the duration of operation by around 20min (P < 0.001), it did not affect the volume or duration of postoperative drainage tube usage between the two groups. This study indicated that intercostal nerve anastomosis improved the local sensation and quality of life of patients who underwent immediate subpectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=42487, identifier ChiCTR1900026340.

Cortiva vs AlloDerm in Prepectoral and Partial Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Several acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are utilized for soft tissue support in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Little high-level evidence supports the use of one ADM over another. Therefore, we sought to compare Cortiva 1mm Allograft Dermis to AlloDerm RTU, the most studied ADM in the literature. Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing Cortiva to AlloDerm in prepectoral and subpectoral immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction was performed at two academic hospitals from March 2017 to December 2021. Reconstructions were direct-to-implant (DTI) or tissue expander (TE). Primary outcome was reconstructive failure, defined as TE explantation prior to planned further reconstruction, or explantation of DTI reconstructions before 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were additional complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and cost. Results: There were 302 patients included – 151 AlloDerm (280 breasts), 151 Cortiva (277 breasts). Reconstructions in both cohorts were majority TE (62% vs 38% DTI), smooth device (68% vs 32% textured), and prepectoral (80% vs 20% subpectoral). Reconstructive failure was no different between ADMs (AlloDerm 9.3% vs Cortiva 8.3%, p=0.68). There were no additional differences in any complications or PROs between ADMs. Seromas occurred in 7.6% of Cortiva but 12 % of AlloDerm cases, whose odds of seroma formation were two-fold (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.01-3.67, p=0.047) higher. AlloDerm variable cost was 10-15% more than Cortiva, and there were no additional cost differences. Conclusion: When assessing safety, clinical performance, PROs, and cost, Cortiva is non-inferior to AlloDerm in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction and may be cheaper with lower risk of seroma formation.

The early postoperative effects of rinsing the breast pocket with tranexamic acid in prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction

BackgroundThe efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) has been reported in breast surgery; however, its application and duration have varied across studies. This study aimed to assess the early postoperative outcomes of rinsing the breast pocket with TXA during prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM). MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted in consecutive patients who underwent immediate prosthetic prepectoral reconstruction between August 2021 and December 2022 For cases performed during the earlier part of the study period (up to April 2022), TXA was not administered (non-TXA group), whereas those performed after April 2022 received topical TXA application during surgery (TXA group). Postoperative outcomes including hematoma, seroma, drainage volume, and drain maintenance duration were compared between the two groups using propensity score matching (PSM). ResultsA total of 674 breasts were analyzed; 280 in the TXA group and 394 were in the non-TXA group. There were 251 breasts in each group after PSM, and their characteristics were similar. The incidence of hematoma in the first 24hours and total drain output were significantly lower in the TXA group than the non-TXA group. In cases of direct-to-implant cases, the TXA group showed a significantly lower seroma rate. ConclusionsRinsing the breast pocket with TXA can potentially reduce the occurrence of hematoma and decrease drain output in prepectoral ADM-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Moreover, this approach may be beneficial in lowering the incidence of seroma in direct-to-implant reconstruction.

Does the dominant hand’s use affect the complication rates in prosthetic breast reconstruction?

Background Numerous studies have investigated risk factors for unfavorable outcomes in prosthetic breast reconstruction, such as obesity, perioperative radiotherapy, and acellular dermal matrix use. However, no reports have explored whether the use of the dominant hand influences complications in breast reconstruction. To address this gap in the literature, analyzed complication rates between the dominant and non-dominant sides after reconstruction.Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 160 patients (170 breasts) who underwent breast reconstruction from February 2017 to March 2022. We analyzed the complications between beasts on the dominant and non-dominant sides according to the reconstruction method.Results During prosthetic breast reconstruction, the drainage volume and duration on the dominant side exceeded those on the non-dominant side after reconstruction (duration: 9.79 days on the dominant side vs. 9.12 days on the non-dominant side, P=0.196; volume: 771.1 mL on the dominant side vs. 654.3 mL on the non-dominant side, P=0.027). The incidence of complications such as wound dehiscence, mastectomy flap necrosis, and infection was significantly higher in the dominant hand group (infection: 6 vs. 0, P=0.014; dehiscence: 15 vs. 4, P=0.009; flap necrosis: 13 vs. 4, P=0.024).Conclusions Complications including seroma, infection, and mastectomy skin flap necrosis following prosthetic reconstruction were common in breasts on the dominant-hand side. Therefore, meticulous management and restriction of shoulder movement can aid in preventing seroma-related complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction, especially on the side of the dominant hand.

Subpectoral dissection using an ultrasonic energy device in prosthetic breast reconstruction

Background Ultrasonic devices have potential advantages over electrocautery surgical scalpels for muscle dissection, as they eliminate the risk of muscle contraction caused by electric currents. In this study, we investigated the outcomes of using both device types in subpectoral dissection for breast reconstruction.Methods In this retrospective single-center study, we examined the electronic medical records of female patients with non-recurrent breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction. The patients were treated with either Harmonic Focus+ Shears (HFS) or a Bovie electrocautery scalpel (BES) between January 2015 and April 2020. The primary clinical outcomes evaluated were total drainage volume, time to drainage tube removal, and operation time. To control for confounding, outcomes were stratified based on the type of tissue expander used—either Mentor or Natrelle.Results The study included 303 patients; 155 (51.2%) were treated with HFS (mean age, 45.28±7.38 years) and 148 (48.8%) with BES (mean age, 44.41±9.37 years). Within each expander type, the frequency of drainage exceeding 30 cc per day after 21 postoperative days showed no statistical difference between the HFS and BES devices. The operation time was shorter for HFS in both the Mentor (85.13±19.81 minutes vs. 109.56±21.66 minutes, P&lt;0.001) and Natrelle (88.09±20.64 minutes vs. 99.88±22.66, P&lt;0.001) groups.Conclusions When controlling for the type of tissue expander as a confounding factor, HFS was associated with reduced operation time. Furthermore, it demonstrated superior clinical effectiveness compared to BES regarding operator convenience.

Online Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) Score Tool in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in a Case Series with Cutoff Determination

AbstractThe Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) score is a tool for the prediction of the risk of complications in breast surgery, elaborated in 2014. This score assesses the risk of surgical complications related to each type of breast reconstruction technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using the calculator on patients who underwent prosthetic breast reconstruction with submuscular tissue expander or prepectoral prosthesis. Our retrospective study analyzed 92 patients whose data was entered into the calculator. The predicted and observed 1-year rates of overall surgical complications were compared, separately for both cohorts. Subsequently, the accuracy, the applicability, and the discrimination ability of the BRA score were assessed using statistical analysis. In the two-stage subpectoral reconstruction group, Mann–Whitney U test showed a statistically significant difference in BRA-score values between the patients who developed complications compared to the patients who had no complications (p-value &lt; 0.02). Moreover, the score has an excellent discrimination ability (AUC = 0.9), and a cutoff of overall surgical complication rate was found to be between 17 and 18%. For the one-stage prepectoral prosthetic reconstruction group, the BRA score tool was unable to discriminate between patients with complications and patients without complication. Our results suggest that the BRA score can accurately identify patients with risk of complications following two-stage subpectoral breast reconstruction. Moreover, we believe it is possible to identify a risk rate cutoff of overall surgical complications that may potentially help physicians select the safest surgical strategy.

Early Seroma Treatment Protocol Based on US-Guided Aspiration in DTI Prepectoral Reconstruction: A Prospective Study

IntroductionSeroma is a common complication after prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction with ADM, leading to wound dehiscencse, infection, and even loss of reconstruction at last. A new ultrasound (US) guided follow-up protocol has been applied to compare primary and secondary complications incidence and their treatment, and evaluate the effect of precocious seroma detection and its evacuation in reducing secondary complications. MethodsWe enrolled 406 patients from January 1st, 2021 to July 1st, 2023 who underwent mastectomy and 1-stage prepectoral reconstruction with ADM. Experimental group counted 96 patients, whom have been treated as protocol fashion, therefore with multiple US-guided evaluations and eventual evacuations along with postoperative period; control group (310 patients) has exclusively been clinically evaluated. ResultsSeroma incidence detected rate among experimental group, after 1-year follow-up, was 32.2%, compared to 16.8% in control cohort, additionally no other secondary complications were detected in the first group. Referring to the wound dehiscence incidence, a statistically significant higher frequency was observed in control group compared with treatment 1 (21.2% vs. 0%; P = .0027). ConclusionsSeroma and correlated secondary complications may lead to additional surgeries, higher sanitary costs and even reconstructive failure. With a seriated US follow-up protocol application, the surgeon could promptly manage and treat seroma, decreasing additional complications rate, particularly wound dehiscence. Level of EvidenceIII.

Interest of acellular dermal matrices in immediate breast reconstruction: Comparison of quality of life and complications with and without matrix

Since 2001, acellular dermal matrices have been increasingly used in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) because they allow for the placement of the ideal-sized definitive implant in one step. They are used in both retropectoral and prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstructions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of dermal matrices on the quality of life and on complications. Two surveys were used to evaluate the quality of life: the BREAST-Q V2.0© and the QuickDASH. The surveys were sent to all patients who had an immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction at a University Hospital Center from 2010 to 2020. A case-control study was performed for comparison of responses between the "Matrix+" and "Matrix-" groups. Seventeen IBR with matrix (23.6%) and 55 IBR without matrix (76.4%) were analyzed. Patients in the "Matrix+" group had a better quality of life in terms of sexual well-being (p=0.038) and a significantly lower QuickDASH (p<0.01). They had better breast satisfaction (p=0.016) and better implant satisfaction (p<0.01). The likelihood of encountering major complications later in time was more important in the group with matrix (p=0.04). We found a satisfactory quality of life with scores of sexual well-being and satisfaction with the breast and the implants, and a better satisfaction with care thanks to the use of the matrices. However, due to a higher number of major late complications and a lack of follow-up, we believe that immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction with matrix should be discussed according to the comorbidities, medical treatments, and the vitality of the skin flaps of each patient.

Managing the animation deformity in breast reconstruction transposing the implant to a partial prepectoral pocket: Early experience and preliminary results with a new technique

Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly used technique for rebuilding a breast. Subpectoral implant placement minimizes complications, such as capsular contracture, implant visibility, malposition, and extrusion. Nevertheless, it is associated with high animation deformity (AD). Prepectoral reconstruction eliminates AD but is subject to a higher risk of implant extrusion and visibility. In this prospective, single-center study we present a new technique aimed to create a new hybrid pocket in which the upper portion of the implant is placed subcutaneously, whereas its inferior pole is still covered by a pectoralis muscle sling reducing implant lower pole visibility and palpability. In each case, the prosthesis was removed and a new hybrid pocket was created by splitting the muscle into two portions, separating its cranial part from the overlying subcutaneous tissue and anchoring it back to the chest wall. The caudal muscle sling was left adherent to the subcutaneous tissue of the central part of the breast. Patient outcomes were evaluated with a BREAST-Q questionnaire preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Forty-eight patients with severe postoperative breast animation were enrolled (8 bilateral and 40 unilateral). No major complications occurred. After a 1-year follow-up, the aesthetic and functional satisfaction rate was high and a good implant coverage was achieved. No residual AD of the breast was observed. Changing the implant placement from the subpectoral to a partially subcutaneous plane, both severe AD and implant extrusion can be avoided, expanding the indications for safe prosthetic breast reconstruction. Level of evidence IV.

Update and Trends in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy

Due to refinements in operating techniques, autologous breast reconstruction has become part of standard care. It has become more difficult to advise patients due to the expansion of oncologic options for mastectomy, radiation therapy and the variety of reconstructive techniques. The goal of reconstruction is to achieve oncologically clear margins and a long-term aesthetically satisfactory result with a high quality of life. Immediate reconstruction preserves the skin of the breast and its natural form and prevents the psychological trauma associated with mastectomy. However, secondary reconstructions often have a higher satisfaction, since here no restitutio ad integrum is assumed. Alloplastic, i. e., implant-based, breast reconstruction and autologous breast reconstruction are complementary techniques. This article provides an overview of current options for breast reconstruction including patients' satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction. Although immediate reconstruction is still the preferred choice of most patients and surgeons, delayed reconstruction does not appear to compromise clinical or patient-reported outcomes. Recent refinements in surgical techniques and autologous breast reconstruction include stacked-flaps, as well as microsurgical nerve coaptation to restore sensitivity, which lead to improved outcomes and quality of life. Nowadays Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy, accompanied by improved implant quality, allows immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction as well as reemergence of the prepectoral implantation. The choice of breast reconstruction depends on the type of mastectomy, necessary radiation, individual risk factors, as well as the patient's habitus and wishes. Overall, recent developments in breast reconstruction led to an increase in patient satisfaction, quality of life and aesthetic outcome with oncological safety.

Is a soft tissue reinforcing mesh necessary in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for early breast cancer in patients with low-volume breast? A single-center, retrospective Chinese clinical study.

It is controversial as to whether soft tissue reinforcement mesh should be used for immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy for low-volume breast early breast cancer (LVBEBC) in Chinese adult women. We collected data on 89 patients with LVBEBC who underwent such a surgery and divided them into two groups: 39 patients in the totally subpectoral prosthesis-only breast reconstruction group (simple group) and 50 patients in the prosthesis-combined titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TCPM) group (or the so-called "dual plane" or "mesh-assisted partially subpectoral breast reconstruction group") (combined group). The results demonstrated no difference in operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative complications between the two groups; however, total drainage volume and extubation time were less and shorter, respectively, in the combined group. The median follow-up time was 18.6months without local recurrence or distant metastasis in both groups. At 24months after surgery, the excellent and good rates of breast reconstruction were higher in the combined group. However, patients' BMI, breast morphology, and breast volume of 300mL or more had an effect on the shape of the reconstructed breast; in addition, in patients with higher BMI, conical breast morphology, and breast volume over 300mL, the shape of the breast was more perfect with the prosthesis combined with TCPM reconstruction.Trial registration: This retrospective study was "retrospectively registered" in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology of China on March 15, 2022 (No. 2022018) and in the National Medical Research Registry filing system of China ( https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn ) (No. MR-44-22-003618).

Comparison of Complication Rates Between Subpectoral Vs Prepectoral Techniques in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

The location of tissue expanders in implant-based breast reconstruction remains controversial, due to variation in surgical techniques and devices. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of early and late complication rates between prepectoral and subpectoral placement of tissue expanders. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult female patients who had two-staged implant-based breast reconstruction from 2013 to 2019 in our institution. Early complication was defined as complications that occurred within 30 days after surgery. Time-to-event analyses were performed and Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounders. 854 patients were included with 76% of patients underwent a subpectoral tissue expander placement. After the first stage procedure, the early complication rate was 34%, and the late complication rate was 36.4%. After the second stage procedure, the early complication rate was 16.3%, and the late complication rate was 16.1%. Location of the tissue expander did not predict either overall early or late complication rates, regardless of the stages of reconstruction, after adjusting for confounders. Tissue expanders placed in prepectoral plane were associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) for developing early and late infection after the first stage of reconstruction (HR 2.1, HR 2.4, respectively) as well as late infection after the second stage of reconstruction (HR 5.3, all p<0.05). Location of tissue expanders did not predict risk of complication. However, the prepectoral group was associated with an increased risk of developing infection.

The Effect of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on One- and Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction and on Autologous Reconstruction: A Multicenter Italian Study among 18 Senonetwork Breast Centres.

In modern breast cancer treatment, a growing role has been observed for breast reconstruction together with an increase in clinical indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Choosing the optimum type of reconstructive technique is a clinical challenge. We therefore conducted a national multicenter study to analyze the impact of PMRT on breast reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective case-control multicenter study on women undergoing breast reconstruction. Data were collected from 18 Italian Breast Centres and stored in a cumulative database which included the following: autologous reconstruction, direct-to-implant (DTI), and tissue expander/immediate (TE/I). For all patients, we described complications and surgical endpoints to complications such as reconstruction failure, explant, change in type of reconstruction, and reintervention. From 2001 to April 2020, 3116 patients were evaluated. The risk for any complication was significantly increased in patients receiving PMRT (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.33-2.24; p < 0.001). PMRT was associated with a significant increase in the risk of capsular contracture in the DTI and TE/I groups (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.57-3.20; p < 0.001). Comparing type of procedures, the risk of failure (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.06-3.12, p=0.030), explant (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 3.85-7.83, p < 0.001), and severe complications (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.88-3.43, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group undergoing DTI reconstruction as compared to TE/I reconstruction. Our study confirms that autologous reconstruction is the procedure least impacted by PMRT, while DTI appears to be the most impacted by PMRT, when compared with TE/I which shows a lower rate of explant and reconstruction failure. The trial is registered with NCT04783818, and the date of registration is 1 March, 2021, retrospectively registered.

Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Reporting in Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Literature Review.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide essential information in reconstructive surgery, where interventions center on patients' functional and aesthetic goals. Although multiple patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been validated for breast reconstruction since 2009, no studies have assessed recent frequency and consistency in use. This study aims to characterize recent trends in inclusion of PROs in recent breast reconstruction literature. Articles published between 2015 and 2021 pertaining to autologous and/or prosthetic breast reconstruction in Annals of Plastic Surgery and Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery were considered in a scoping review. Original breast reconstruction articles were reviewed for use of PROMs and characteristics of administration in accordance with PRISMA-Scr guidelines. Previously defined scoping review criteria were considered, including PROM used, timeline of collection, and topics addressed, with trends in frequency and consistency of usage assessed over the designated period. Of the 877 articles reviewed and 232 articles included, 24.6% reported using any PROM. The majority used BREAST-Q (n = 42, 73.7%), with the remainder being institutional surveys or previously validated questionnaires. Patient-reported outcomes were most often collected retrospectively (n = 20, 64.9%) and postoperatively (n = 33, 57.9%). The average time point of postoperative survey administration was 16.03 months (SD, 19.185 months). χ2 Analysis revealed no significant association between the numbers of articles, including PROMs and the year (P = 0.1047). This study demonstrates that only one-fourth of breast reconstruction articles report the use of PROMs with no interval increase over recent years. Patient-reported outcome measures were predominantly used retrospectively and postoperatively with notable variation in timing of administration. The findings highlight the need for improved frequency and consistency of PROM collection and reporting, as well as for further exploration into barriers and facilitators of PROM use.

Adverse Outcome of Two-Staged Breast Reconstruction: More Than One Culprit

BackgroundTwo-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with initial insertion of a tissue expander followed by change-over to an implant after a period of inflation has become a well-established option in breast reconstruction. Our aim was to analyze the feasibility of two-stage breast reconstruction in our center by following the surgical technique, number of complications and associated risk factors. Patients and methodsWe studied 91 patients who underwent skin sparring mastectomy and tissue expander placement in our surgical unit, between January 2017 and December 2021. Axillary surgery was performed in all patients. We collected data on age, smoker status, breast size, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment and surgical intervention details. ResultsSkin necrosis (12.08%) and seroma (16.48%) were the most common complications. 7.69% of the patients required reintervention. Patients underwent delayed reconstruction after more than 6 months in 69.7% of the cases, while the overall reconstruction rate was 86.08%. Smoker status, an increased body mass index, comorbidities, neoadjuvant treatment, type of incision and location of the implant were the main factors that led to adverse outcomes. ConclusionsTissue expanders are a viable option for reconstruction; however, we observed a higher incidence of skin complications in smokers and in cases where periareolar incision was used.