Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Research Articles

Commercial prices and their influence on urology practices: Prostate cancer care among men with Medicare.

For men with prostate cancer, there is substantial variation in the use of conservative management, such as active surveillance. Commercial prices, which vary across urology practices, may afford incentives that foster physician behaviors associated with utilization. Such behaviors may "spillover" to the Medicare population and affect quality. This study evaluated the effects of practice-level commercial prices on health care utilization and quality in men with prostate cancer insured by traditional Medicare. From a 20% Medicare sample, the authors identified men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2014-2019 (n=44,653). Using commercial payments from the MarketScan database, they developed a practice-level commercial price index (ratio of commercial prices to Medicare prices). They examined the association of the price index with price standardized spending, overtreatment (treatment among those with >50% noncancer mortality within 10 years), and underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance (at least one prostate-specific antigen test and one confirmatory test-MRI, prostate biopsy, genomic test-within 12 months of diagnosis). Practice-level commercial price indices varied from 1.34 (134% of Medicare prices), for practices in the bottom decile, to 3.00, for practices in the top decile. Increasing price index was associated with lower odds of overtreatment (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.97; p=.01), but not price standardized spending or underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance. Commercial prices vary markedly across urology practices. Among newly diagnosed men with traditional Medicare, those managed by practices with higher commercial price indices had lower odds of overtreatment, suggesting improved prostate cancer care quality.

Multidimensional Healthcare Access Barriers to Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing: A Nation-Wide Panel Study in the United States From 2006 to 2020.

Rising metastatic prostate cancer incidence has renewed debate regarding benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Identifying barriers to accessing screening for individuals at high risk of lethal prostate cancer may slow this rise. We examined associations of access barriers with receipt of PSA testing, stratified by sociodemographic factors. We pooled data from male respondents to Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Systems (BRFSS) surveys from 2006 to 2020. Questions related to affordability (insurance, cost of visits) and accommodation (regular primary care provider (PCP), physician recommending a PSA test) were considered as individual-level barriers. For availability, we linked provider density from the 2012 Area Health Resource File and estimated driving times to closest health facility within Micropolitan and Metropolitan Statistical Area (MMSA) using Google Earth Engine. These measures were used to compute a spatial accessibility index. We fit survey-weighted, covariate-adjusted logistic regression models to estimate associations of barriers with receipt of PSA within the past 2 years and examined effect modification by sociodemographic factors. There were 185,643 participants, of whom 73% were White, 11% were Black, 4% were Asian, and 11% were Hispanic. Physician recommendation was the strongest predictor of having a PSA test (aOR: 14.5, 95% CI: 13.6, 15.6). Not having a regular PCP (aOR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.31), insurance (aOR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.71), and prohibitive cost of care (aOR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.90) were associated with lower PSA testing. Access barriers were stronger predictors of PSA testing for Asian and White participants compared to other groups (Phet < 0.004 for insurance and regular PCP) and for those with college education compared to those without (Phet < 0.05 for insurance, perceived unaffordability). Physician recommendation was the strongest predictor of receipt of PSA testing, regardless of sociodemographic grouping. Future studies should consider access barriers jointly and across sociodemographic strata.

Prostate-Specific Antigen Stratification for Predicting Advanced Prostate Cancer Events in Men Approaching Age Limits for Recommended Screening.

Our goal was to quantify the ability of various PSA values in predicting the likelihood of developing metastatic or fatal prostate cancer in older men. We used a random sample of patients in the US Veterans Health Administration to identify 80,706 men who had received PSA testing between ages 70 to 75. Our primary end point was time to development of either metastatic prostate cancer or death from prostate cancer. We used cumulative/dynamic modeling to account for competing events (death from non-prostate cancer causes) in studying both the discriminative ability of PSA as well as for positive predictive value and negative predictive value at 3 time points. PSA demonstrated time-dependent predictive discrimination, with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve at 5, 10, and 14 years decreasing from 0.83 to 0.77 to 0.73, respectively, but without statistically significant difference when stratified by race. At PSA thresholds between 1 and 8 ng/mL, the positive predictive value of developing advanced prostate cancer was significantly greater in Black than White patients. For instance, at a PSA > 3, at 5, 10, and 14 years, White patients had 2.4%, 2.9%, and 3.7% risk of an event, whereas Black patients had 4.3%, 6.5%, and 8.3% risk. In men aged 70 to 75 deciding whether to cease PSA testing with borderline-elevated PSA values, the risk of developing metastatic or fatal prostate cancer is quantifiable and relatively low. Risk assessment in this setting must account for the higher incidence of prostate cancer in Black men.

G-Protein-Coupled Receptor-Associated Sorting Protein 1 Overexpression Is Involved in the Progression of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Early-Stage Prostatic Malignant Diseases, and Prostate Cancer

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy, necessitating accurate diagnostic methods to distinguish it from benign conditions such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Current diagnostic tools, relying primarily on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, lack specificity, leading to an over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment of patients with benign conditions. This study explores G-protein-coupled receptor-associated sorting protein 1 (GASP-1) as a more sensitive biomarker for PCa detection. Methods: Prostate tissue microarrays of healthy, BPH, and prostate cancer patients with different Gleason scores were studied. Polyclonal antibodies targeted against GASP-1 were used for routine immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analyses. Results: The results indicated a 5-fold difference in serum GASP-1 levels between BPH and PCa, which was validated through GASP-1 IHC. Furthermore, a novel scoring system, the H-score, assesses GASP-1 granules’ intensity and size, revealing a clear distinction between BPH and PCa. An additional analysis of GASP-1 expression between PCa cases with different Gleason scores reveals that GASP-1 overexpression correlates with PCa severity, providing insights into disease progression. Conclusions: The study supports GASP-1′s role as a promising diagnostic marker, supplementing PSA testing, and offering improved risk stratification for PCa. Additionally, an open-source software system is introduced for an efficient GASP-1 granule color analysis, enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) as a Predictor of Prostate Cancer on Transrectal Biopsy: A Meta-Analysis

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in men globally. Early detection is critical for improving patient outcomes. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is a widely used screening tool, but its accuracy in predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy remains a topic of debate. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PSA in predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted to identify relevant studies published between 2013 and 2024. Studies reporting the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of PSA for predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy were included. Data were extracted, and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a random-effects model. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1,245 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PSA for predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75 - 0.82) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), respectively. The pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 3.27 (95% CI, 2.45-4.37), 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.28), and 16.39 (95% CI, 10.27-26.21), respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). In conclusion, PSA demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy in predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy. However, it is essential to consider its limitations, including false positives and negatives. Further research is needed to identify strategies to improve the accuracy of PSA testing and reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Determinants of Prostate Cancer Screening in Korean Men: A Nationwide Study Using the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2023.

Research on the prevalence of prostate cancer (PCa) screening and reasons for undergoing screening is limited. We aimed to identify the factors influencing PCa screening behavior and explore the underlying motivations among Korean men. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2023 Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, which employs a nationally representative random sampling method. This study included 1,784 men aged 40-74 years. The respondents reported their experiences with PCa screening. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors associated with participation in PCa screening. The lifetime PCa screening rate was 18.6%. Among screening modalities, transrectal ultrasonography was the most frequently used (31.9%), followed by prostate-specific antigen tests (25.6%) and digital rectal examinations (21.5%). The multivariable analysis identified several factors that significantly increased the likelihood of screening participation, including older age, living with a spouse, poor self-reported health, and abstinence from alcohol consumption in the previous 12 months. Men who had undergone colorectal cancer screening were more likely to participate in PCa screening (adjusted odds ratio, 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-7.93) than those who had not. The primary motivations for screening were recommendations from family or social networks (31.9%) and inclusion in health examination packages (24.3%), whereas healthcare provider recommendations (18%) and symptomatic concerns (5.7%) were the least influential. Our findings highlight the importance of providing evidence-based information for PCa screening recommendations and the need for improved communication and implementation of a shared decision-making approach for PCa screening in Korea.

Geographical variation in prostate cancer testing explained by socio-economic position in Stockholm

Abstract Background Prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is controversial but remains prevalent in many countries. Despite its prevalence there is little information in Sweden or globally on the spatial heterogeneity in PSA testing. This study aims to describe the spatio-temporal variation in PSA testing in the Stockholm region specifically at the municipality and small area level. Additionally, it aims to quantify the extent to which socio-economic position (SEP) indicators such as education, income, and country of birth explain the observed variation in PSA testing. Methods A retrospective population-based register study was conducted, encompassing men aged 40 years and older residing in the Stockholm region from 2007 to 2016. Utilizing spatial smoothing techniques, we calculated the age-standardised proportion of men undergoing PSA testing prior to any prostate cancer diagnosis within each area for every calendar year. Furthermore, we used Bayesian logistic regression models with spatial random effects to estimate the individual-level association between PSA testing and socio-economic position. The proportion of variance in PSA testing explained by various measures of SEP was also estimated at both the municipality and small area levels. Results Significant geographical disparities in PSA testing were observed across small areas within Stockholm. The proportion of variance explained in PSA testing at the small area level was highest for income (32.6%), followed by education (9.7%) and country of birth (7.4%). Incorporating all SEP measures led to a higher proportion of explained variance at the small area level (41.6%) compared to the municipality level (24.8%). Conclusions PSA testing was significantly associated with various socio-economic indicators and some of the spatial variation could be explained by SEP. It would be useful to ascertain whether similar patterns are observed in other regions or countries. Key messages • The findings suggested widespread and consistent opportunistic prostate cancer screening practices within the Stockholm region, raising concerns regarding potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment. • The socio-economic differences in prostate cancer screening could partially explain the differences in cancer incidence and mortality.

Overdiagnosis for screen-detected prostate cancer incorporating patient comorbidities

Abstract Background Evidence regarding the likelihood of overdiagnosis in prostate cancer (CaP) screening with PSA are mainly based on clinical trials, which include younger population with fewer comorbidities than those receiving the test in clinical practice. We aimed to assess the likelihood of overdiagnosis and associated variables using real-world data. Methods Retrospective cohort of men &amp;gt;40 years with PCa, who had been diagnosed being asymptomatic and after a positive PSA test in the previous 12 months in two hospitals (2004-2022). The probability of overdiagnosis was estimated considering the life expectancy of the Spanish male in the year 2022 and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (lead time 10 years). PSA values and Gleason score were included as independent variables. Results Of the 2,331 patients in the cohort, 1,070 (46%) met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. The median follow-up time was 5.7 years (IQR 3.2-8.6). The median age was 71 years (IQR 65-78) and 37% had more than one comorbidity. At diagnosis, the median life expectancy was 12 years (IQR 4-18) and the probability of overdiagnosis was 30.8% (IQR 17.6-52.4). Patients with PSA levels &amp;gt;10 mg/dl tended to be older and with more comorbidities than those with PSA levels 4-10 mg/dl, and thus, with shorter life expectancy. The median probability of overdiagnosis was higher in patients with PSA levels &amp;gt;10 mg/dl (41.4%, IQR 21.5-73.9) than in those with PSA levels 4-10 mg/dl (20.1%, IQR 12.8-30.4), p &amp;lt; 0.001. Correspondingly, patients with Gleason score ≥8 were more likely to be overdiagnosed (median 42.6%, IQR 23.6-68.6) than those with Gleason score ≤6 (median 20.1%, IQR 12.8-30.4) (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions In clinical practice, older patients with comorbidities showed high PSA levels and Gleason score ≥8, presenting low life expectancy at diagnosis and, therefore, high probability of overdiagnosis. This highlights the importance of considering the patient’s comorbidities when ordering a new PSA test. Key messages • A detailed assessment of the prevalence of comorbidities among CaP patients in real-life settings has significant implications for patient management. • The decision to make an early diagnosis should be based on individual life expectancy, where comorbidity is at least as important as age.

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing in a general practice 2009-2019.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is not recommended as a population screening measure for prostate cancer. PSA testing is nevertheless widespread and is associated with harm due to false-positive test results, overdiagnosis and economic costs. This study sought to document the exposure of patients to PSA testing over a decade in a general medical practice setting. Laboratory results for each year were extracted from the clinical record. A chart review was undertaken for cases of prostate cancer. We report 13,743 PSA results in 3313 men. In any year, 18% of all men and 33% of men aged over 50years had at least one PSA test. Between 4.8 and 21% of first tests exceeded age normal values depending on age. There were 113 incident cancers in the study interval of which 84 (74%) were screen detected. Mortality was lower in screen-detected than symptomatic cancers. Men at our practice are significantly exposed to PSA testing. We found evidence of possible overdiagnosis.

Prostate cancer screening with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing: A retrospective study

Objective: To evaluate the results of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test used in prostate cancer screening. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on a total of 1106 male individuals, including 615 people (55.6%) aged 40-54, 379 people (34.3%) aged 55-69, and 112 individuals (10.1%) aged 70 and over. In the study, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test results were performed on a total of 1106 male individuals aged 40 and over registered in the Uludag University Family Health Center, Bursa, Turkey during the 5-years between June 1, 2018, and May 31, 2023, were taken from the database and analyzed. Relationships with sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and risk factors were examined. Data was analyzed using SPSS 25. Results: About 15.5% of the participants were married, 78.4% were single, and 6% were separated from their spouses or widows. The PSA values of the patients referred to the urologist were found to be significantly different between the ages of 55 and 69. It was determined that the PSA levels of the patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer were higher than the patients without any finding, and the mean was 6.81±4.39 (p=0.01). Conclusion: In our study, it is important to diagnose benign prostatic hypertrophy or prostate cancer in patients aged 55-69 years, whose mean PSA levels were 6.81±4.39, and referred to a urologist. As a contribution to the discussions in the literature, we recommend that the patient with symptoms be referred to the urologist after the test request and the joint decision with the family physician. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.8558 How to cite this: Goktas O. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing: A retrospective study. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(10):2324-2330. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.8558 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Factors affecting prostate cancer detection through asymptomatic PSA testing in primary care in England: Evidence from the 2018 National Cancer Diagnosis Audit.

Background Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is used in primary care for prostate cancer detection, either for symptomatic assessment or asymptomatic testing following an informed decision. Aim To estimate the proportion of prostate cancer cases diagnosed following asymptomatic PSA testing, and patient and practice factors influencing this route. Design and setting 2018 English National Cancer Diagnosis Audit (NCDA) data were analysed, with linkage to the national cancer registry, practice-level Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF), and General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) data. All 2018 NCDA patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer were included (n = 9,837). Method Patients with recorded biomarker testing and no recorded symptoms prior to diagnosis were classified as asymptomatic PSA detected prostate cancer. Patient (age, ethnicity, deprivation, co-morbidities) and GP practice (geographical location, area deprivation, list size, urgent suspected cancer referral rate, QOF outcomes, GPPS results) factors were analysed for association with asymptomatic PSA testing using mixed effects logistic regression models. Results 1,884 out of 9,837 (19%) prostate cancer cases were detected following asymptomatic PSA testing, 982 (52.1%) of whom were patients aged 50-69 years. Younger age, non-White ethnicity, lower deprivation, and lower co-morbidity count were associated with an increased likelihood of diagnosis following asymptomatic PSA testing. There was a 13-fold variation between practices in the odds of asymptomatic PSA-detected cases, without clear explanatory GP practice-level factors. Conclusion One in five patients with prostate cancer in England are diagnosed after asymptomatic PSA testing in primary care, with large variation in asymptomatic PSA detection between GP practices.

Post-Treatment surveillance intensity and overall survival in prostate cancer survivors (AFT-30).

Post-treatment surveillance affects millions of cancer survivors, but empiric data to guide clinical practice is lacking. This study assessed whether the intensity of surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer is associated with overall survival. Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2005 and 2010 who underwent RP or RT at a Commission on Cancer-accredited facility were randomly sampled. Primary data collected of 10,147 patients sampled across 1007 facilities were linked with existing data from the National Cancer Database. Analysis examined whether intensity of surveillance measured as the number of PSA tests in the first year after primary treatment [categorized as 0-1 (low intensity), 2 (medium) or ≥ 3 (high intensity) PSA tests] was associated with overall survival. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and subsequent use of imaging tests, biopsy procedures, and salvage treatment. Median follow-up exceeded 8 years from prostate cancer diagnosis. OS was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups among RT (P = .59) or RP (P = .29) patients. RFS was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups for RT (P = .13) patients, but was for RP (P = .01) patients with high intensity associated with the worse RFS. In both treatments, higher surveillance intensity was associated with more procedures and salvage treatments. In patients with localized prostate cancer, more frequent PSA surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy was associated with increased procedures and salvage treatments but not overall survival.

The Diagnostic Value of bpMRI in Prostate Cancer: Benefits and Limitations Compared to mpMRI.

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men and a leading cause of death worldwide. Early detection is vital, as it often presents with vague symptoms such as nocturia and poor urinary stream. Diagnostic tools like PSA tests, ultrasound, PET-CT, and mpMRI are essential for prostate cancer management. The PI-RADS system helps assess malignancy risk based on imaging. While mpMRI, which includes T1, T2, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE), is the standard, bpMRI offers a contrast-free alternative using only T2 and DWI. This reduces costs, acquisition time, and the risk of contrast-related side effects but has limitations in detecting higher-risk PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions. This study compared bpMRI's diagnostic accuracy to mpMRI, focusing on prostate volume and PI-RADS scoring. Both methods showed strong inter-rater agreement for prostate volume (ICC 0.9963), confirming bpMRI's reliability in this aspect. However, mpMRI detected more complex conditions, such as periprostatic fat infiltration and iliac lymphadenopathy, which bpMRI missed. While bpMRI offers advantages like reduced cost and no contrast use, it is less effective for higher-risk lesions, making mpMRI more comprehensive.

Midlife baseline prostate-specific antigen, velocity, and doubling time association with lethal prostate cancer and mortality.

Midlife baseline prostate-specific antigen (MB PSA), defined as a single PSA value measured between 40-59 years of age, has been proposed as a tool that can limit potential harms of PSA screening. This study aimed to examine the ability of MB PSA versus PSA doubling time (PSADT) and PSA velocity (PSAV) in assessing the likelihood of developing of lethal prostate cancer (PCa) in a diverse and contemporary North American population. Men 40-59 years old, who received their first PSA between the years 1995 and 2019, were included. For MB PSA values, the first PSA test result was included. For PSADT, the first two PSA test results were included. For PSAV, the first three PSA test results within 30 months were included. Selection criteria resulted in a total of 77,594 patients with at least two PSA test results and 11,634 patients with at least three PSA test results. Multivariable Fine-Gray regression was used to examine the impact of the value of the PSA testing methods on the development of lethal PCa (defined as death from PCa or development of metastatic disease either at diagnosis or during follow-up). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve (AUC) at 5, 10, and 15 years were plotted. In the main cohort, patients were most frequently in the 50-54 age category (32.8%), had a Charlson comorbidity index of 0 (70.5%), and were White (63.2%). Of these, 9.3% had the midlife baseline PSA in the top 10th percentile, and 0.4% had a PSADT 0-6 months. Lethal PCa was diagnosed in 593 (0.8%) patients. The median (interquartile range) time to lethal PCa was 8.6 (3.2-14.9) years. In the main cohort, MB PSA and PSADT showed significant associations with the occurrence of lethal PCa, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.85-7.68) and HR of 2.20 (95% CI, 1.07-4.54) for patients in the top 10th percentile MB PSA group and in the PSADT between 0 to <6 months group, respectively. In patients with three PSA results available, MB PSA and PSAV showed significant associations with the occurrence of lethal PCa, with a HR of 3.95 (95% CI, 2.29-6.79) and 3.57 (95% CI, 2.17-5.86) for patients in the top 10th percentile MB PSA group and in the in the PSAV >0.4 ng/mL/year group, respectively. PSADT and PSAV did not exhibit higher AUCs than MB PSA in assessing the likelihood of lethal PCa. Specifically, they were 0.818 and 0.708 at 10 and 15 years, respectively, for the PSADT; 0.862 and 0.756 at 10 and 15 years, respectively, for the PSAV; and 0.868 and 0.762 at 10 and 15 years, respectively, for the MB PSA (all p>.05). The study findings are that PSAV or PSADT were not superior to midlife baseline in assessing the likelihood of developing lethal PCa. This suggests that these variables may not have practical use in enhancing PSA screening strategies in a clinical setting.

The impact of non-structured PSA testing on prostate cancer-specific mortality on New Zealand Māori men

ObjectivesTo assess the impact of differences in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing rates on prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and PCa-specific mortality among Māori men in a New Zealand (NZ) population.Patients and MethodsMāori men aged 40 years or older, without a history of PCa, with a PSA test between 2006 and 2018 were included. The cohort was divided into two groups; the “screened group” (ScG) consisting of men who had at least one PSA test every four years or less, and the “non-screened group” (non-SG). We measured the rate of cancer diagnoses and used competing risk analysis to assess survival.ResultsThe study cohort included 63,939 Māori men, with 37,048 (58%) in the ScG. PCa was more frequently diagnosed in the ScG (3.7% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001). A higher proportion of high-grade cancers were found in the non-SG (32.7% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.001). The 10-year cancer-specific survival was significantly higher in the ScG (99.4% vs. 98.5%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable risk model, PSA testing frequency was an independent predictor of PCa mortality. (HR 2.43, [95% CI 1.97–3.01], P < 0.001).ConclusionsIn a cohort of only Māori men, lower PSA testing rates were associated with a higher risk of PCa-related death. Therefore, regular PSA testing for Māori could improve cancer-specific survival among Māori men. Regular PSA testing should be considered a priority area for improving PCa survival in this population.

B-121 Optimizing Test Ordering: Leveraging Heuristics in Naming Conventions - A PSA Case Study

Abstract Background A common screening test for prostate cancer is the Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test, which may also be referred to as total PSA or total PSA plus free PSA, among other variations. Looking at the test menus of two major reference laboratories, it's apparent that PSA can be ordered under thirteen different test names. From an end-user perspective, the question arises: which of these thirteen tests should be ordered, and why are there so many options? This plethora of choices can lead to confusion and uncertainty for clinicians and patients alike. According to various guidelines, ordering Free PSA is only warranted when PSA values exceed 4 ng/ml. In such cases, the ratio of free PSA to total PSA can aid in further clinical decision-making and patient workup. At Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFGH), we offer two tests for PSA. The first is named “Prostate Specific Antigen” is total PSA done in house, while the second is labeled “Prostate Spec. Ag. Total and Free.” which is sent out to a reference lab. Upon reviewing our send-out orders, we observed a significant increase (376%) from 2022 to 2023 in the use of the send out order. Methods The ordering data for our providers was collected from February 2022 to January 2024 for both in-house and send-out orders. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel. Results In our population, we observed an abnormal concentration of send-outs originating from a select group of physicians. Additional we also identified a group of providers who only selected the send out test order. Analysis of in-house assay results for PSA revealed that only 15% (1292 out of 8136) exceeded the cutoff of 4 ng/ml, necessitating further testing to inform clinical decision-making. Yet our send out volume of 4157 test is in discordance with how many PSA would need further evaluation. Based on a cost analysis reducing the send out volume by 80% could result in $53,210 savings. Therefore, to reduce the send out amount and to keep the naming convention similar we decided to implement a new test name that would reflex the PSA to Free PSA if the PSA is above 4 ng/ml. We decided on the name “Prostate Specific Antigen total with reflex to Free Prostate Specific Antigen”. Conclusions Our investigation into the variability in PSA test ordering revealed a significant disparity in the number of send-out orders, particularly originating from a select group of physicians. However, the disproportionately high volume of send-out tests suggested an inefficiency in the current testing approach. To address this issue and align with clinical guidelines, we decided to process a request to our medical executive committee for approval for this reflex test in order to meet reimbursement compliance with the Office of the Inspector General. This change aims to streamline the process, reduce unnecessary send-out tests, and ultimately improve the efficiency and accuracy of prostate cancer screening at our institution.

B-345 The PSA and free PSA Concentrations in Serum of Apparently Healthy Subjects Using the Atellica IM hsPSA and fPSAII Assays

Abstract Background PSA assays are recommended in the screening for prostate cancer (PC) among males 50 years and older. Those with PSA results in the gray zone (between 4 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL) and a nonsuspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) may be further tested with the free PSA (fPSA) assays to improve detection of PC. PSA and fPSA are also detected in apparently healthy subjects. The goal of this study was to evaluate the distribution of high sensitivity PSA (hsPSA), fPSAII, and %fPSAII (fPSAII/hsPSA x 100) values generated on the Atellica® IM Analyzer among apparently healthy subjects by age decade. Methods Serum samples were prospectively collected from apparently healthy subjects at multiple sites across the United States: 673 males 50-70+ years presenting at primary care facilities for routine PSA testing (&amp;gt;120 samples in each age decade (50-59, 60-69, 70+ years) and 113 samples in each of two younger decades (30-39, 40-49 years). Distribution statistics include the mean, median, interquartile range, 2.5th, 95th, and 97.5th percentiles. Results In this study, using samples from healthy men 30-70+ years (N=786), it was observed that median hsPSA results increased with every decade from 0.682 ng/mL at 30-39 years to 2.183 ng/mL at age 70+ years. The 97.5th percentiles were below 4.0 ng/mL in men &amp;lt;50 years, and above 4.0 ng/mL in men &amp;gt;50 years. All men (100%) 30-49 years had an hsPSA result below 4.0, and 95.5% of men 50-59 years had an hsPSA result below 4.0. The percent of subjects with hsPSA values above the cut-off of 4.0 was 6.6% among men 60-69 years and 12.4% among men &amp;gt;70 years. Median hsPSA values for each age group were comparable to median PSA values reported for healthy men older than 50 years old without cancer undergoing routine health check-ups in the United States and other countries (median hsPSA value was 0.90 among men 50-59 years). For both hsPSA and fPSAII, it was observed that average values increased with each successive decade for subjects 30-70+ years. The range across decades was 0.904-2.183 ng/mL for hsPSA and 0.23-0.46 ng/mL for fPSAII. However, the average %fPSAII (fPSA/hsPSAx100) values did not consistently rise over time because hsPSA variances also increase, a pattern previously documented. Conclusions The distribution of Atellica® IM hsPSA and fPSAII assay values from apparently healthy males was determined. CAUTION: Investigational Device. Not available for sale. Future availability cannot be guaranteed. The results are preliminary and were achieved in unique setting with no expected timeline for completion.

Recommended Guidelines for Screening for Underlying Malignancy in Extramammary Paget's Disease Based on Anatomic Subtype

IntroductionExtramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD) may be associated with an underlying internal adenocarcinoma, referred to as secondary EMPD. Differences in this association by EMPD anatomic subtype and implications for screening are not fully understood. ObjectiveDefine the rates of secondary EMPD and types of associated adenocarcinomas by EMPD anatomic subtype and propose a screening algorithm for underlying adenocarcinoma. MethodsSystematic literature review of EMPD (January 1990- November 2022). One hundred twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. A multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed the recommendation statements on adenocarcinoma screening. ResultsPerianal EMPD was associated with a high rate of underlying adenocarcinoma (25%, primarily colorectal) compared with penoscrotal and vulvar EMPD (6% each, primarily of genitourinary origin). Thorough screening in perianal EMPD includes a colonoscopy, urine cytology, and computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Cost-conscious screening tests in low-risk penoscrotal disease include urine cytology, heme-occult test, and prostate-specific antigen test (especially if under 70 years of age). For low-risk vulvar EMPD, urine cytology and mammography are recommended. EMPD with high-risk features may warrant more sensitive organ-specific testing. LimitationsSelection bias; retrospective data without systematic follow-up. ConclusionsScreening for underlying adenocarcinoma in EMPD should be guided by anatomic location.

A Novel Phytocolorant, Neoxanthin, as a Potent Chemopreventive: Current Progress and Future Prospects.

Cancer is a general term for a group of similar diseases. It is a combined process that results from an accumulation of abnormalities at different biological levels, which involves changes at both genetic and biochemical levels in the cells. Several modifiable risk factors for each type of cancer include heredity, age, and institutional screening guidelines, including colonoscopy, mammograms, prostate-specific antigen testing, etc., which an individual cannot modify. Although a wide range of resources is available for cancer drugs and developmental studies, the cases are supposed to increase by about 70% in the next two decades due to environmental factors commonly driven by the way of living. The drugs used in cancer prevention are not entirely safe, have potential side effects and are generally unsuitable owing to substantial monetary costs. Interventions during the initiation and progression of cancer can prevent, diminish, or stop the transformation of healthy cells on the way to malignancy. Diet modifications are one of the most promising lifestyle changes that can decrease the threat of cancer development by nearly 40%. Neoxanthin is a xanthophyll pigment found in many microalgae and macroalgae, having significant anti-cancer, antioxidant and chemo-preventive activity. In this review, we have focused on the anti-cancer activity of neoxanthin on different cell lines and its cancer-preventive activity concerning obesity and oxidative stress. In addition to this, the preclinical studies and future perspectives are also discussed in this review.

Clinicopathological Study of Prostate Diseases and Its Correlation with PSA Level, Size of Prostate and Gleason’s Scoring System in Case of Prostatic Carcinoma

Background: Prostate gland diseases significantly impact adult males globally, with an increasing prevalence due to aging populations. The primary conditions affecting the prostate are inflammation, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and tumors, with BPH being the most common. Prostatic carcinoma is also prevalent, with a high lifetime risk. Prostate cancer incidence increases with age, and early detection relies on digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and PSA testing. Aim of the study: The study aims to find out correlation between PSA, Gleasons scoring system and HER-2/NEU gene in prostatic cancer. Methods: This study, conducted from July 2017 to June 2019 at BIRDEM General Hospital, enrolled 110 male patients aged 50-100 with clinical signs of prostatic diseases. Patients provided written informed consent and met specific inclusion criteria. Specimens were obtained via TURP, simple or radical prostatectomy, preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin and examined for pathological lesions. PSA levels were measured using an immunoassay, and Gleason scoring was used for carcinoma categorization. Data were collected via questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS software. Result: The study analyzed 110 prostatic disease cases, with patients averaging 67.7 years. The most common diagnosis was BPH with inflammation (50.9%), followed by BPH without inflammation (35.5%) and adenocarcinoma (13.6%). Urgency (80%), increased micturition frequency (78.2%), poor stream (78.2%), and urinary retention (77.3%) were the most common symptoms. There was a significant correlation between serum PSA levels and prostate size (p &lt; 0.001), with higher PSA levels indicating larger prostates and a higher likelihood of adenocarcinoma. The most frequent Gleason score was 4+4=8 (40%). HER2/neu overexpression showed a marginal correlation with PSA levels (p=0.053). Conclusion: The study found that the most common age group for prostatic diseases was 61-70 years. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was the most frequent lesion. Grade II (31-50g) prostate size was common on ultrasound. Most patients had a PSA level of 0-5 ng/ml, aiding early diagnosis and reducing morbidity