Prostate-specific Antigen Response Rate Research Articles

Efficacy and Toxicity of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from the U.S. Expanded-Access Program and Comparisons with Phase 3 VISION Data.

The phase 3 VISION trial demonstrated that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who progressed on taxane-based chemotherapy and androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The U.S. expanded-access program (EAP; NCT04825652) was opened to provide access to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for eligible patients until regulatory approval was obtained. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP and compare the results with those from the VISION trial. Methods: Patients enrolled in the EAP at 4 institutions in the United States with available toxicity and outcome data were included. Outcome measures included OS, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) of at least 50%, and incidences of toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in baseline characteristics, outcome data, and toxicity between the EAP and VISION were evaluated using t testing of proportions and survival analyses. Results: In total, 117 patients with mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP between May 2021 and March 2022 were eligible and included in this analysis. Patients enrolled in the EAP were more heavily pretreated with ARSI (≥2 ARSI regimens: 70% vs. 46%; P < 0.001) and had worse performance status at baseline (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2: 19% vs. 7%; P < 0.001) than VISION patients. EAP and VISION patients had similar levels of grade 3 or higher anemia (18% vs. 13%; P = 0.15), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 8%; P = 0.13), and neutropenia (3% vs. 3%; P = 0.85) and similar PSA RRs (42% vs. 46%; P = 0.50) and OS (median: 15.1 vs. 15.3 mo; P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP were later in their disease trajectory than VISION patients. Patients enrolled in the EAP achieved similar PSA RRs and OS and had a safety profile similar to that of the VISION trial patients.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used due to their affordability and minimal severe side effects. However, their influence on the efficacy of cancer treatments, particularly androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), remains unclear. This study investigates the impact of PPI usage on the treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A total of 117 mCRPC patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the concomitant use of PPI at the initiation of ARSI treatment: PPI+ (n = 38) and PPI- (n = 79). Patient characteristics, including age at ARSI treatment administered, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at ARSI treatment administered, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at prostate biopsy, metastatic site at ARSI treatment administered, prior docetaxel (DTX) treatment, and type of ARSI (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA response rates were compared between the two groups. Patients were further stratified by clinical background to compare PFS and OS between the two groups. The PPI- group exhibited significantly extended PFS and a trend toward improved OS. For PSA response (reduction of 50% or more from baseline), the rates were 62.3% and 45.9% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. For deep PSA response (reductions of 90% or more from baseline), the rates were 36.4% and 24.3% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. The effects were consistent across subgroups divided by prior DTX treatment and type of ARSI administered. The administration of PPIs appears to diminish the therapeutic efficacy of ARSIs in mCRPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the biological mechanisms involved.

Gleason Pattern 5 May Be a Prognostic Factor in Radium-223 Treatment.

Radium-223 treatment reduces the risk of death in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This study analyzed the prognostic factors in patients treated with radium-223 dichloride. Patients who received radium-223 dichloride were retrospectively analyzed. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decline rates were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and prognostic factors for OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Fifty-six patients were included in the study. The five-year OS rate in patients after diagnosis of CRPC was 62.2% [95% confidence interval (CI)=27.55-112.45], while the five-year OS rate in patients at the initiation of radium-223 treatment was 21.3% (95%CI=17.20-36.79). Six patients (11.1%) had a >50% PSA decline rate, and 10 (17.9%) had a >50% ALP decline rate. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that PSA levels at the initiation of radium-223 treatment [hazard ratio (HR)=1.00; 95%CI=1.00-1.00; p=0.0054] and Gleason Pattern (GP) 5 (HR=5.42; 95%CI=1.08-27.27; p=0.0400) were associated with OS. Patients with GP 5 had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with patients with a GP ≤4. Early administration of radium-223 as a first- or second-line treatment was not associated with OS compared with late administration of radium-223 as a third-line or later treatment. GP 5 and high PSA levels at radium-223 initiation were associated with worse OS. Radium-223 as first- or second-line treatment was not associated with OS. Therefore, a treatment strategy for CRPC based on GP 5 is needed.

Real‑world retrospective study of early‑stage prostate cancer at a Portuguese Comprehensive Cancer Centre: The PEarlC study.

Despite the high prevalence of localised prostate cancer (LPC) and locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC), evidence on the characteristics of patients, treatments and clinical outcomes stratified by disease risk is limited. The PEarlC study was conducted to characterise a cohort of patients with early-stage prostate cancer that included real-world clinical outcomes. Retrospective data from a cohort of patients diagnosed with LPC/LAPC between 2015 and 2017 and followed up until December 2020 at a Portuguese comprehensive cancer centre (IPO Porto) was analysed. Patients were classified as LPC (high- or non-high-risk) or LAPC according to European Association of Urology guidelines, were eligible if diagnosed at stage I-III and followed up in Urology, Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology outpatient clinics of IPO Porto. Data was collected from the medical/administrative records database. Clinical outcomes included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), PSA response (palliative) and no evidence of residual tumour (prostatectomy). Time-to-event outcomes were compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. A total of 790 patients were included (54.8% non-high-risk LPC, 30.9% high-risk LPC, 14.3% LAPC) and the median follow-up was 46.7 months. Patients had a median age of 68.0 years. The majority of patients were stage II (52.9%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1 (99.9%) and received treatment with curative intent (85.4%). The median was only achieved in progression-free survival (29.9 months; 95% CI, 26.5-41.0 months), as evaluated in palliative patients. At year 5, 82.9% were free of PSA progression (curative), 87.5% were metastasis-free, 83.7% were disease-free, all patients in palliative treatment progressed and the 5-year OS rate was 92.9% (CI 95%, 90.2-95.7%). Among patients with LPC, OS was worse in high-risk vs. non-high-risk patients (5-year OS rate, 88.8% vs. 96.8%; hazard ratio=3.34, CI 95%, 1.64-7.05; P=0.001). PSA response rate was 81.4% in the palliative setting. There was no evidence of residual tumour in 61.6% of patients who underwent prostatectomy. Although most patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated at IPO Porto showed positive 5-year real-world outcomes, patients with high-risk LPC showed worse OS compared with patients with non-high-risk LPC and therefore a poorer prognosis. The present large-sample real-world study is an important contribution to reducing the evidence gap on prostate cancer.

Utidelone for heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after failing docetaxel treatment: An open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

e17036 Background: The appropriate chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progressed after docetaxel treatment remains unmet medical needs. Utidelone (UTD1) is a genetically engineered epothilone analog with antitumor activity in taxane-resistant cancers. UTD1 was approved for advanced breast cancer in 2021. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of UTD1 in mCRPC. Methods: In this perspective, phase II clinical trial, men with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel and abiraterone, and/or enzalutamide, and/or apalutamide received UTD1 monotherapy treatment at a total dose of 150 mg/m2 for five days intravenous, every three weeks until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity, or death. We reported the preliminary results for potential benefits in this new treatment. The primary endpoint was prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rate, defined as a 50% or greater reduction in serum PSA. The secondary endpoint included investigators-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) according to RECIST v1.1, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) according to PCWG3 criteria, overall survival (OS), and safety. The trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200061635). Results: By January 31st, 2024, twenty-five mCRPC patients with a median age of 67 years were enrolled in this study at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center since March 23rd, 2022. Patients received an average of 4.2 lines of prior anticancer treatments: 100% of them received docetaxel, 96.0% of them received abiraterone, and 80.0% progressed after enzalutamide, and/or apalutamide. 28.0% of patients had visceral metastases, and 88.0% patients had bone metastases. At of the cut-off date, the PSA response rate was 16.0%. The median rPFS and OS were 4.9 months and 7.1 months, respectively. One patient had a durable response for 19.2 months and had been remaining on study treatment to date. One PR and four SD were observed in ten patients with measurable lesions, resulting in an overall ORR and DCR of 10.0% and 50.0%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) including peripheral sensory neuropathy (76.0%), dyspepsia (72.0%), anemia (64.0%), constipation (60.0%), fatigue (64.0%), nausea (36.0%), leukocytopenia (32.0%), arthralgia (32.0%), dizziness (32.0%), vomiting (20.0%), and diarrhea (20.0%) were manageable. The 3/4 grade TRAEs included anemia (16.0%), and diarrhea (4%). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: UTD1 has demonstrated promising efficacy and favorable tolerance in heavily pretreated mCRPC patients after progression on docetaxel in the preliminary analyses. Additional randomized trials are warranted for this new regimen. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200061635.

Pembrolizumab plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-365 Cohort D

Background and objectiveAbiraterone acetate (abiraterone) plus prednisone is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus abiraterone in mCRPC. MethodsIn cohort D of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573), patients were chemotherapy-naïve, had disease progression ≤6 mo before screening, and had either not received prior next-generation hormonal agents for mCRPC or had received prior enzalutamide for mCRPC and had disease progression or became intolerant to enzalutamide. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 wk plus abiraterone 1000 mg orally once daily and prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily. The primary endpoints were safety, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, and objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3–modified RECIST v1.1 by BICR and overall survival (OS). Key findings and limitationsFor the 103 patients who were treated, median follow-up was 28 mo (interquartile range 26–31). The confirmed PSA response rate was 56% (58/103 patients). The ORR for patients with RECIST v1.1–measurable disease was 16% (6/37 patients). Median rPFS was 15 mo (95% confidence interval 9.2–22) and median OS was 30 mo (95% confidence interval 23–not reached); the estimated 24-mo OS rate was 58%. In total, 91% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, and 39% experienced grade 3–5 events. Grade 3/4 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was observed in 12% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. One patient died due to treatment-related myasthenic syndrome. Study limitations include the single-arm design. ConclusionsPembrolizumab plus abiraterone and prednisone demonstrated antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. Higher incidence of grade 3/4 elevated ALT/AST occurred than was reported for the individual agents. Patient summaryFor patients with metastatic castratation-resistant prostate cancer, the drug combination of pembrolizumab plus abiraterone and prednisone showed antitumor activity and acceptable safety.

Protocol for CHAMPION study: a prospective study of maximal-cytoreductive therapies for patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who achieve oligopersistent metastases during systemic treatment with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy

BackgroundThe proposed trial is to examine the feasibility of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided cytoreduction plus apalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) at oligometastatic state.MethodsCHAMPION (NCT05717582) is an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial, planning to enroll newly diagnosed mHSPC cases with oligometastases (≤ 10 distant metastatic sites in conventional imaging). Patients will receive 6 cycles of apalutamide plus ADT. Patients with oligometastatic disease at PSMA PET/CT after 3 treatment cycles will receive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy. PSMA PET/CT-guided metastasis-directed external radiation therapy will be determined by the investigators. Apalutamide plus ADT will be continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA), no disease progression, and no symptom deterioration after 6 cycles of apalutamide plus ADT. Secondary endpoints include the percentage of patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL and oligometastases by the end of 3 treatment cycles, PSA response rate, and safety. Fleming’s two-stage group sequential design will be adopted in the study, where the null hypothesis is that the rate of patients with an undetectable PSA is ≤ 40% after 6 cycles of treatment, while the alternate hypothesis is an undetectable PSA of > 60%; with one-sided α = 0.05, power = 0.80, and an assumed dropout rate of 10%, the required number of patients for an effective analysis is 47. Enrolment in the study commenced in May 2023.DiscussionThe multi-modal therapy based on treatment response may improve the prognosis of newly diagnosed mHSPC patients with oligometastases.Trial registrationThe study is registered with Clinical Trials.Gov (NCT05717582). Registered on 8th February 2023.

177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world study.

The use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy has become increasingly recognized as a viable therapeutic approach for patients in the advanced stages of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is limited data regarding its effectiveness and safety in earlier lines. This study aims to present our institution's experience with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as a first-line systemic therapy for mCRPC. We collected and analyzed data from consecutive mCRPC patients who underwent first-line treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at our center from 2015 to 2023. The various outcome measures included best prostate-specific antigen-response rate (PSA-RR) (proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% decline in PSA); objective radiographic response rate (ORR) (proportion of patients achieving complete or partial radiographic responses); radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) (measured from treatment initiation until radiographic progression or death from any cause); overall survival (OS) (measured from treatment initiation until death from any cause); and adverse events. Forty treatment-naïve mCRPC patients with PSMA-positive disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were included (median age: 68.5 years, range: 45-78; median PSA: 41 ng/mL, range: 1-3028). These patients received a median cumulative activity of 22.2 GBq (range: 5.55-44.4) [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 over 1-6 cycles at 8-12 week intervals. A ≥ 50% decline in PSA was observed in 25/40 (62.5%) patients (best PSA-RR). Radiographic responses were evaluated for thirty-eight patients, with thirteen showing partial responses (ORR 34.2%). Over a median follow-up of 36 months, the median rPFS was 12 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 9-15), and the median OS was 17 months (95% CI: 12-22). Treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 anemia, leucopenia, and thrombocytopenia were noted in 4/40 (10%), 1/40 (2.5%), and 3/40 (7.5%) patients, respectively. The findings suggest that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is a safe and effective option as a first-line treatment in mCRPC. Further trials are needed to definitively establish its role as an upfront treatment modality in this setting.

A phase 2 study of AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab or oleclumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundInhibition of the adenosine 2A receptor (A2AR) diminishes the immunosuppressive effects of adenosine and may complement immune-targeting drugs. This phase 2 study evaluated the A2AR antagonist AZD4635 in combination with durvalumab or oleclumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.MethodsPatients with histologically/cytologically confirmed disease progressing within 6 months on ≥ 2 therapy lines were randomly assigned to either Module 1 (AZD4635 + durvalumab) or Module 2 (AZD4635 + oleclumab). Primary endpoints were objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Secondary endpoints included radiological progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics.ResultsFifty-nine patients were treated (Module 1, n = 29; Module 2, n = 30). Median number of prior therapies was 4. One confirmed complete response by RECIST (Module 1) and 2 confirmed PSA responses (1 per module) were observed. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) possibly related to AZD4635 were nausea (37.9%), fatigue (20.7%), and decreased appetite (17.2%) in Module 1; nausea (50%), fatigue (30%), and vomiting (23.3%) in Module 2. No dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related serious AEs were observed. In Module 1, AZD4635 geometric mean trough concentration was 124.9 ng/mL (geometric CV% 69.84; n = 22); exposures were similar in Module 2. In Modules 1 and 2, median (95% CI) rPFS was 2.3 (1.6 –3.8) and 1.5 (1.3– 4.0) months, respectively. Median PFS was 1.7 versus 2.3 months for patients with high versus low blood-based adenosine signature.ConclusionIn this heavily pretreated population, AZD4635 with durvalumab or oleclumab demonstrated minimal antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile. Clinical Trial.gov identifier: NCT04089553.

Enzalutamide versus Abiraterone Plus Prednisolone for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Sub-Analysis from the ENABLE Study for PCa

Enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) can improve the survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the agent that is more effective against nonmetastatic CRPC remains unclear. To evaluate the agent that can be used as the first-line treatment for CRPC, an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (ENABLE Study for PCa) including both metastatic and nonmetastatic CRPC was conducted in Japan. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, overall survival, some essential survival endpoints, and safety of patients with nonmetastatic CRPC were also analyzed. In this subanalysis, 15 and 26 patients in the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively, presented with nonmetastatic CRPC. There was no significant difference in terms of the PSA response rate between the ENZ and ABI arms (80% and 64%, respectively; p = 0.3048). The overall survival did not significantly differ between the two arms (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.22–2.14, p = 0.5260). No significant differences were observed in terms of radiographic progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival between the ENZ and ABI arms (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.35–1.84; p = 0.6056 and HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.19–2.73; p = 0.6443, respectively). Only four and six patients in the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively, had ≥grade 3 adverse events. ABI and ENZ had similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC.

Clinical outcomes in metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide.

The management of metastatic prostate cancer has progressed immensely in the last decade. This study aims to investigate the real-world clinical outcomes of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide. The findings will assist healthcare providers in making more informed decisions when choosing between these two drugs for treating these patients. A retrospective analysis of 80 patients at our tertiary care hospital was conducted from January 2015 to July 2022. Data were analysed using SPSS version 20.0. An independent sample T-test was used for continuous data and the chi-square test for categorical data. Medians and means were calculated for continuous or ordinal variables. Kaplan-Meier survival curves presented progression-free and overall survival (OS), with comparisons made using the log-rank test. Survival rates with 95% CIs were reported, with p < 0.05 considered significant. In our final analysis of 80 patients, the median age was 65 years, with 88% having an eastern cooperative oncology group performance status between 0 and 2. Histopathology showed adenocarcinoma in 91% of cases. Grade Group III-IV disease was present in 51.3%, and 67.5% had a Gleason Score of >8. Bilateral orchidectomy was performed in 41 patients (51.25%), with a median Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue use of 32 months. Most patients (72.5%) were castration-sensitive. Among the 80 patients, 60 (75%) were treated with abiraterone and 20 (25%) with enzalutamide. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time was >6 months in 80% of the abiraterone group and 75% of the enzalutamide group. PSA response rates were similar for both drugs, with comparable rates of progressive disease, partial response, stable disease and complete response (p = 0.036). There was no significant difference in median time to progression (19 months for abiraterone versus 18 months for enzalutamide) (95% CI 9.7-27.9; p = 0.004). The median OS for the entire cohort was 67 months (95% CI 39-94; p = 0.003). The findings suggest that both abiraterone and enzalutamide are effective in prolonging progression-free and overall survival in this patient population, providing comparable safety. Further studies are recommended to validate these findings and inform clinical decision-making.

Nomogram to predict the presence of PSMA-negative but FDG-positive lesion in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

PSMA-negative but FDG-positive (PSMA-/FDG+) lesion in dual-tracer (68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is associated with an unfavorable response to Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617. This study sought to develop both radiomics and clinical models for the precise prediction of the presence of PSMA-/FDG+ lesions in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CPRC). A cohort of 298 patients who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT with a less than 5-day interval was included. The evaluation of the prognostic performance of the radiomics model drew upon the survival data derived from 40 patients with CRPC treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in an external cohort. Two endpoints were evaluated: (a) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, defined as a reduction exceeding 50% from baseline and (b) overall survival (OS), measured from the initiation of 177Lu-PSMA-617 to death from any cause. PSMA-/FDG+ lesions were identified in 56 (18.8%) CRPC patients. Both radiomics (area under the curve [AUC], 0.83) and clinical models (AUC, 0.78) demonstrated robust performance in PSMA-/FDG+ lesion prediction. Decision curve analysis revealed that the radiomics model yielded a net benefit over the 'screen all' strategy at a threshold probability of ⩾4%. At a 5% probability threshold, the radiomics model facilitated a 21% reduction in 18F-FDG PET/CT scans while only missing 2% of PSMA-/FDG+ cases. Patients with a low estimated score exhibited significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio = 0.49, p = 0.029) and a higher PSA response rate (75% versus 35%, p = 0.011) compared to those with a high estimated score. This study successfully developed two models with accurate estimations of the risk associated with PSMA-/FDG+ lesions in CRPC patients. These models held potential utility in aiding the selection of candidates for 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment and guiding 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-directed radiotherapy.

Co-occurring BRCA2/SPOP Mutations Predict Exceptional Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Sensitivity in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Background and objectiveBRCA2 mutations in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) confer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, additional factors predicting PARP inhibitor efficacy in mCRPC are needed. Preclinical studies support a relationship between speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) inactivation and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. We hypothesized that SPOP mutations may predict enhanced PARP inhibitor response in BRCA2-altered mCRPC. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving 13 sites. We identified 131 patients with BRCA2-altered mCRPC treated with PARP inhibitors, 14 of which also carried concurrent SPOP mutations. The primary efficacy endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% PSA decline). The secondary endpoints were biochemical progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). These were compared by multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, tumor stage, baseline PSA level, Gleason sum, prior therapies, BRCA2 alteration types, and co-occurring mutations. Key findings and limitationsBaseline characteristics were similar between groups. PSA responses were observed in 60% (70/117) of patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPwt disease and in 86% (12/14) of patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut disease (p = 0.06). The median time on PARP inhibitor treatment was 24.0 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.2 mo to not reached) in this group versus 8.0 mo (95% CI 6.1–10.9 mo) in patients with BRCA2 mutation alone (p = 0.05). In an unadjusted analysis, patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut disease experienced longer PSA-PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [95% CI 0.15–0.72], p = 0.005) and clinical/radiographic PFS (HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.18–0.86], p = 0.02), and numerically longer OS (HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.15–1.12], p = 0.08). In a multivariable analysis including histology, Gleason sum, prior taxane, prior androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, stage, PSA, BRCA2 alteration characteristics, and other co-mutations, patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut disease experienced longer PSA-PFS (HR 0.16 [95% CI 0.05–0.47], adjusted p = 0.001), clinical/radiographic PFS (HR 0.28 [95% CI 0.1–0.81], adjusted p = 0.019), and OS (HR 0.19 [95% CI 0.05–0.69], adjusted p = 0.012). In a separate cohort of patients not treated with a PARP inhibitor, there was no difference in OS between patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut versus BRCA2mut/SPOPwt disease (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.40–2.4], p = 0.94). In a genomic signature analysis, Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) SBS3 scores predictive of homologous recombination repair (HRR) defects were higher for BRCA2mut/SPOPmut than for BRCA2mut/SPOPwt disease (p = 0.04). This was a retrospective study, and additional prospective validation cohorts are needed. Conclusions and clinical implicationsIn this retrospective analysis, PARP inhibitors appeared more effective in patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut than in patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPwt mCRPC. This may be related to an increase in HRR defects in coaltered disease. Patient summaryIn this study, we demonstrate that co-alteration of both BRCA2 and SPOP predicts superior clinical outcomes to treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors than BRCA2 alteration without SPOP mutation.

Promising Therapeutic Activity of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer : A Pilot Experience.

177 Lu-PSMA-617 has been shown to improve survival outcomes in patients with end-stage metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, data in earlier lines remain limited. In this study, we intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with synchronous high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients with synchronous high-volume metastases (defined as ≥4 skeletal metastases with ≥1 extra-axial site or any visceral metastasis) showing high PSMA expression on 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and ineligible/unwilling for conventional chemohormonal treatment options were selected. Approximately, ~5.55-7.4 GBq of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 was administered intravenously at 8-12 weeks intervals, up to 6 cycles. All patients underwent concomitant androgen deprivation therapy/orchiectomy. The outcome measures included the proportion of patients achieving an undetectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (ie, ≤0.2 ng/mL) at any time point after therapy, best PSA response rate, objective radiographic response rate, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Ten patients with high-volume mHSPC received a median cumulative activity of 32.4 GBq (range, 7.4-44.4) of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 over 1-6 cycles. Five patients (50%) achieved an undetectable PSA with 9 patients (90%) showing a ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline. Nine patients underwent radiological follow-up, of which 7 (77.8%) had an objective response. The median radiographic progression-free survival was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 18-30), whereas the median overall survival was not reached. None of the patients had any grade 3/4 adverse event. 177 Lu-PSMA-617 seems to be a promising efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with synchronous high-volume mHSPC.

Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death-1 (PD-1)/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AimsThe aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Materials and methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until 1 July 2022 for mCRPC trials testing PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. We measured the efficacy and safety using overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate or treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). When possible, data were meta-analysed. ResultsThirteen studies involving 2533 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.42–1.20, I2 = 80.3%, PHeterogeneity＜0.001) and for PFS was 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.38–0.92, I2 = 72.2%, PHeterogeneity = 0.013). Furthermore, better ORR (relative risk = 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.25–6.13, I2 = 0%, PHeterogeneity = 0.699) was found in PD-L1-expressing tumours. However, no statistical trends between PD-L1 status on PSA response rate (relative risk = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.5–1.25, I2 = 0%, PHeterogeneity = 0.953) and tumour mutational burden on ORR (relative risk = 2.53, 95% confidence interval 0.49–13.12, I2 = 74.5%, PHeterogeneity = 0.02) were observed. The pooled proportions of TRAEs and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs were 85.1% (95% confidence interval = 71.7–98.5%) and 31.6% (95% confidence interval = 18.9–44.4%), respectively. ConclusionsThis meta-analysis showed that among selected populations of men with mCRPC, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination treatment may significantly increase the PFS benefits. However, overall survival in mCRPC warrants further testing.

Pembrolizumab and Enzalutamide in Patients with Abiraterone Acetate–Pretreated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Cohort C of the Phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 Study

BackgroundLimited responses have been observed in patients treated with enzalutamide after disease progression on abiraterone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but androgen receptor signaling impacts T-cell function. ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide in mCRPC. Design, setting, and participantsPatients in cohort C of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study, who received ≥4 wk of treatment with abiraterone acetate in the prechemotherapy mCRPC state and experienced treatment failure or became drug-intolerant, were included. InterventionPembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 wk plus enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary endpoints were safety, the confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, and the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 on blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) on BICR and overall survival (OS). Results and limitationsA total of 102 patients received pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide. Median follow-up was 51 mo (interquartile range 37–56). The confirmed PSA response rate was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16–33%). The confirmed ORR was 11% (95% CI 2.9–25%; 4/38 patients; two complete responses). Median rPFS was 6.0 mo (95% CI 4.1–6.3). Median OS was 20 mo (95% CI 17–24). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 94 patients (92%); grade 3–5 TRAEs occurred in 44 patients (43%). The incidence of treatment-related rash was higher with combination therapy than expected from the safety profile of each drug. One patient (1.0%) died of a TRAE (cause unknown). Study limitations include the single-arm design. ConclusionsPembrolizumab plus enzalutamide had limited antitumor activity in patients who received prior abiraterone treatment without previous chemotherapy for mCRPC, with a safety profile consistent with the individual profiles of each agent. Patient summaryPembrolizumab plus enzalutamide showed limited antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.The KEYNOTE-365 trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02861573.

Prostate-specific antigen doubling time predicts the efficacy of site-directed therapy for oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundIn recent years, site-directed therapies (SDTs) targeting progressive lesions in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer have attracted attention. However, whether they effectively treat oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains unclear. Here, we investigated the efficacy of SDT in patients with oligoprogressive CRPC and identified prognostic factors. MethodsWe reviewed 59 patients with oligoprogressive CRPC who underwent SDT targeting prostate or metastatic lesions between April 2014 and March 2022. We evaluated the associations between several pretreatment clinical variables and treatment procedures and a >50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to next treatment (TTNT). ResultsA PSA response of >50% was observed in 66% of patients. The median PFS and TTNT were 8.3 months and 9.9 months, respectively. Patients with PSA doubling time ≥6 months showed a higher >50% PSA response rate (87% vs. 45%; P < 0.001), longer PFS (median, 15.0 vs. 5.0 months; P < 0.001), and longer TTNT (median, 16.3 vs. 5.9 months; P < 0.001) than patients with PSA doubling time <6 months. In multivariate analyses, a PSA doubling time of ≥6 months independently predicted a >50% PSA response, favorable PFS, and TTNT (P = 0.037, 0.025, and 0.017, respectively). ConclusionPSA doubling time of ≥6 months may be a key indicator of the favorable efficacy of SDT for oligoprogressive CRPC.

The Efficacy and Safety of a Low Relative Dose Intensity of Cabazitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Clinical trials have shown that the efficacy of a reduced dose of cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) was not inferior to that of the standard dose (25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). However, the efficacy of even lower relative dose intensities, such as 20 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, have not been evaluated conclusively. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a low relative dose intensity of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the real world. We retrospectively analyzed 101 consecutive patients treated with cabazitaxel for docetaxel-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The progression-free and overall survival after introduction of cabazitaxel and prostate-specific antigen response rate were assessed as oncological outcome measures. The patients were divided into two groups (relative dose intensity >60%, n=74 and ≤60%, n=27). Both progression-free and overall survivals were significantly better in the >60% group than in the ≤60% group (median 5 and 2 months, p<0.01, and 15 and 6 months, p<0.01, respectively). In multivariate analyses, visceral metastasis and relative dose intensity ≤60% were prognostic factors for shorter progression-free and overall survivals (p=0.04, p<0.01, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between groups. The cabazitaxel relative dose intensity ≤60% group had significantly shorter progression-free and overall survivals than the >60% group, whereas the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different. The results suggested that reducing the relative dose intensity of cabazitaxel to ≤60% may not be recommended.

Biomarker-Directed Therapy in Black and White Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Black men have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer. Whether precision oncology disparities affect Black men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. To compare precision medicine data and outcomes between Black and White men with mCRPC. This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) consortium, a multi-institutional registry with linked clinicogenomic data, from April 2020 to December 2021. Participants included Black and White patients with mCRPC with molecular data. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to May 2023. Database-reported race and ethnicity. The primary outcome was the frequency of actionable molecular data, defined as the presence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), homologous recombination repair deficiency, or tumor mutational burden of 10 mutations per megabase or greater. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of other alterations, the type and timing of genomic testing performed, and use of targeted therapy. Efficacy outcomes were prostate-specific antigen response rate, site-reported radiographic response, and overall survival. A total of 962 eligible patients with mCRPC were identified, including 204 Black patients (21.2%; median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 61 [55-67] years; 131 patients [64.2%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 92 patients [45.1%] with de novo metastatic disease) and 758 White patients (78.8%; median [IQR] age, 63 [57-69] years; 445 patients [58.7%] with Gleason scores 8-10; 310 patients [40.9%] with de novo metastatic disease). Median (IQR) follow-up from mCRPC was 26.6 (14.2-44.7) months. Blood-based molecular testing was more common in Black men (111 men [48.7%]) than White men (317 men [36.4%]; P < .001). Rates of actionable alterations were similar between groups (65 Black men [32.8%]; 215 White men [29.1%]; P = .35), but MMRD or MSI-H was more common in Black men (18 men [9.1]) than White men (36 men [4.9%]; P = .04). PTEN alterations were less frequent in Black men than White men (31 men [15.7%] vs 194 men [26.3%]; P = .003), as were TMPRSS alterations (14 men [7.1%] vs 155 men [21.0%]; P < .001). No other differences were seen in the 15 most frequently altered genes, including TP53, AR, CDK12, RB1, and PIK3CA. Matched targeted therapy was given less frequently in Black men than White men (22 men [33.5%] vs 115 men [53.5%]; P = .008). There were no differences in response to targeted therapy or survival between the two cohorts. This cohort study of men with mCRPC found higher frequency of MMRD or MSI-H and lower frequency of PTEN and TMPRSS alterations in Black men compared with White men. Although Black men received targeted therapy less frequently than White men, no differences were observed in clinical outcomes.

Race and Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Black patients present with more aggressive disease and experience higher mortality than White patients with prostate cancer. Race and social determinants of health influence prostate cancer-specific mortality and overall survival (OS); however, in a previous trial, Black patients did not have inferior outcomes compared with White patients, possibly because of equitable access to care available in a clinical trial setting. To compare differences in survival outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by race in a phase 3 trial with a large proportion of Black patients. This secondary analysis of patient-level data of a prospective phase 3 randomized clinical trial included patients with newly diagnosed mCSPC enrolled between March 1, 2013, and July 15, 2017. Analysis was conducted between December 2022 and February 2023. Patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy were randomized (1:1) to receive either orteronel 300 mg orally twice daily (experimental group) or bicalutamide 50 mg orally daily (control group). OS, with progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary end point. Among 1313 participants, 135 (10%) identified as Black and 1077 (82%) as White, with an equal racial distribution between groups. Black patients were younger (median [IQR] age, 65.8 [60-70] vs 68.4 [62.5-74.1] years; P = .001) and had a higher median (IQR) baseline prostate-specific antigen response rate than White patients (54.7 [19.8-222.0] vs 26.7 [9.2-96.0] ng/mL; P < .001). At a median follow-up of 4.9 years, Black and White patients had similar median PFS (2.3 years; 95% CI, 1.8-1.4 years vs 2.9 years; 95% CI, 2.5-3.3 years; P = .71) and OS (5.5 years; 95% CI, 4.8-NR vs 6.3 years; 95% CI, 5.7-NR; P = .65). The multivariable analysis confirmed similar PFS and OS after adjusting for known prognostic factors. No interaction between race and treatment was observed. In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial studying androgen deprivation therapy with first- or second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, both Black and White patients demonstrated similar OS and PFS. Equitable access to care may reduce historical differences in outcomes between Black and White patients with advanced prostate cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01809691.