Prostate Cancer Screening Program Research Articles

Enhancing Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Using PSA-Guided Screening in High-Risk Men Under 50

Abstract Background Prostate Cancer remains a significant global public health concern. It is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. Current guidelines, including those by the USPSTF, ACS and ASCO offer varying recommendations on PSA screening. Present clinical practice, primarily targeting men aged 50-69. Our study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of using PSA for targeted screening in men under 50 who are at high risk, enhancing early detection of prostate cancer. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized data from our hospital’s prostate cancer screening program collected from 2022 to 2023, including104 individuals under 50. Participants were categorized based on PSA levels 4-10 ng/mL (n=71) and over10 ng/mL (n=33). We analyzed the number of cases diagnosed with prostate cancer and the correlation with PSA levels, Gleason Scores (GS), family history, and ethnicity/race. Results In the104 participants, 88 of them were diagnosed with prostate cancer, highlighting an 84.6% detection rate. Among PSA levels 4-10 ng/mL group, 36 out of 43 White or Caucasian and 13 out of 13 Black or African American men were identified as GS 6-10. In the group PSA over 10 ng/mL, 18 White or Caucasian and 6 Black or African American individuals with more aggressive disease (GS 6-10). Importantly, a substantial fraction of these cases had a first-degree relative with prostate cancer, emphasizing the influence of family history on PSA screening decision. Conclusion Our findings suggest that PSA-guided screening in men under 50 at high risk can enhance the early detection of prostate cancer. The significant presence of intermediate-risk prostate cancer (GS 6 or 7) in populations at higher risk due to ethnicity/race and family history. Our study highlights the potential benefits of revisiting current screening guidelines to lower the age threshold for high-risk populations.

B-321 Enhancing Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Using PSA-Guided Screening in High-Risk Men Under 50

Abstract Background Prostate Cancer remains a significant global public health concern. It is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. Current guidelines, including those by the USPSTF, ACS and ASCO offer varying recommendations on PSA screening. Present clinical practice, primarily targeting men aged 50-69. Our study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of using PSA for targeted screening in men under 50 who are at high risk, enhancing early detection of prostate cancer. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized data from our hospital's prostate cancer screening program collected from 2022 to 2023, including104 individuals under 50. Participants were categorized based on PSA levels 4-10 ng/mL (n=71) and over10 ng/mL (n=33). We analyzed the number of cases diagnosed with prostate cancer and the correlation with PSA levels, Gleason Scores (GS), family history, and ethnicity/race. Results In the104 participants, 88 of them were diagnosed with prostate cancer, highlighting an 84.6% detection rate. Among PSA levels 4-10 ng/mL group, 36 out of 43 White or Caucasian and 13 out of 13 Black or African American men were identified as GS 6-10. In the group PSA over 10 ng/mL, 18 White or Caucasian and 6 Black or African American individuals with more aggressive disease (GS 6-10). Importantly, a substantial fraction of these cases had a first-degree relative with prostate cancer, emphasizing the influence of family history on PSA screening decision. Conclusions Our findings suggest that PSA-guided screening in men under 50 at high risk can enhance the early detection of prostate cancer. The significant presence of intermediate-risk prostate cancer (GS 6 or 7) in populations at higher risk due to ethnicity/race and family history. Our study highlights the potential benefits of revisiting current screening guidelines to lower the age threshold for high-risk populations.

Abstract C178: Uptake of prostate cancer screening services in men living with HIV in Trinidad and Tobago

Abstract Background: Compared to other groups, Black men have a higher incidence and mortality of prostate cancer (PCa). Worldwide, the Caribbean region has one of the highest age-standardized PCa incidences with 76 cases per 100,000 population per year. PCa incidence in predominantly Afro-Caribbean countries ranges from 160 in Barbados to 304 men diagnosed per 100,000 in Jamaica. In Tobago, 10% of adult men over 40yrs were found to be diagnosed with PCa. Additionally, men living with HIV (MLWH) are more susceptible and vulnerable to cancer due to their immune-compromised status. Thus, in the Caribbean, there is a pressing need for clinic-based PCa screening in MLWH. Objective: A preliminary quality improvement evaluation of a prostate cancer screening (PSA test) program targeting MLWH in Trinidad and Tobago from January 2019 to May 2024. Methodology: The electronic health information system from a large clinic was used to abstract prostate cancer screening (PSA) delivery. No personal identifiers were collected from the system to protect the privacy of individuals and abide by Trinidad and Tobago’s data protection law. According to NCCN guidelines, since most of our patients were Afro-Caribbean or Mixed, this study treated all MLWH aged < 75yrs as men with high risk and used 3 ng/mL as the threshold; the threshold was 4 ng/mL for MLWH >75yrs. Evaluation of quality improvement of interventions approach was applied. Descriptive analyses were conducted using SPSS. Results: Between January 2019 and May 2024, a total of 2,442 MLWH were eligible to participate in the PSA screening clinic. The average age was 54.0 (age range: 40- 90). 62.9% were Afro-Caribbean, 17.6% were Mixed, 7.4% were East Indian/Indian, and 0.6% were Caucasian. 45.6% of MLWH completed at least secondary education. 26.2% reported having steady partners and 82.5% reported their sexual orientation was heterosexual. Among all MLWH who attended the clinic, 2,127 (87.1%) were referred for PSA tests and 1,640 (77%) MLWH received their PSA tests. For PSA results collected from participants aged 40-75, 86.6% were ≤ 3 ng/mL and 13.4% were > 3 ng/mL. Additionally, among PSA results of participants aged over 75, 51.9% were < 4 ng/mL and 48.1% were ≥ 4 ng/mL. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind in the Caribbean region. Among MLWH, PSA screening rate was relatively high at 77%. Not too surprising, the PSA results showed 13% of men under 75 and almost 50% of men over 75 had elevated PSAs requiring confirmatory screening and follow-up. Hence, we conclude that a whole-person care approach that includes cancer prevention with prostate cancer screening can be effective. We thus recommend an implementation and dissemination science approach to create strategies for adopting, implementing, sustaining, and disseminating clinic-based prostate cancer-related prevention to reduce related morbidity and mortality among MLWH within the Caribbean and the Americas. Citation Format: Jonathan Edwards, Gaole Song, Gregory Boyce, Selena Todd, Sharon Soyer, Tessa Galindo, Kimlin Ashing, Jeffrey Edwards. Uptake of prostate cancer screening services in men living with HIV in Trinidad and Tobago [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C178.

Organized prostate cancer screening program: a proposal from the Italian Society of Urology (SIU).

To contrast opportunistic PCa screening, the European Union Council suggested extending screening programs to PCa by recommending the implementation of a stepwise approach in the EU Countries to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an organized program based on PSA testing in combination with additional MRI as a follow-up test. The objective of this expert-based document is to propose an organized PCa screening program according to the EU Council recommendations. The Italian Society of Urology (SIU) developed a team of experts with the aim to report 1) the most recent epidemiologic data about incidence, prevalence, and mortality of PCa; 2) the most important risk factors to identify categories of men with an increased risk to eventually develop the disease; 3) the most relevant studies presenting data on population-based screening; and 4) the current recommendations of the leading International Guidelines. According to previous evidence, the Panel proposed some indications to develop a new organized PCa screening program for asymptomatic men with a life-expectancy of at least fifteen years. The SIU Panel strongly supports the implementation of a pilot, organized PCa screening program inviting asymptomatic men in the age range of 50-55 years. Invited men who are already performing opportunistic screening will be randomized to continue opportunistic screening or to cross into the organized protocol. Men with PSA level ≤3 ng/mL and familiarity for PCa received a DRE as well as all those with PSA levels >3 ng/mL. All other men with PSA levels greater than 3 ng/mL proceed to secondary testing represented by mpMRI. Men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesions 3 and PSAD 0.15 ng/mL/cc or higher as well as those with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions proceed to targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy. The primary outcome of the proposed pilot PCa screening program will be the detection rate of clinically significant PCa defined as a tumor with a ISUP Grade Group ≥2. Main secondary outcomes will be the detection rate of aggressive PCa (ISUP Grade Group ≥4); the detection rate of insignificant PCa (ISUP Grade Group 1); the number of unnecessary prostate biopsy avoided, the metastasis-free survival, and the overall survival. Men will be invited over a one-year period. Preliminary analyses will be planned 2 and 5 years after the baseline enrollment. According to the recent EU Council recommendations on cancer screening, pilot studies evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of PCa screening programs using PSA as the primary and mpMRI as the secondary screening test in selected cohorts of patients must be strongly promoted by scientific societies and supported by national governments.

Prostate cancer screening? Only evidence-based, risk-adjusted, and organized!

In view of arecent recommendation of the European Commission to conceptualize novel screening approaches for lung, gastric, and prostate cancer, Germany is also invoked to revise its prostate early detection program. This discussion article provides an overview of new findings on prostate cancer screening, which suggest an organized and risk-adapted screening approach. Based on the German risk-adapted screening trial PROBASE, together with recently published data on organized screening programs in Europe, model projects should be established to determine the specific modalities for anew organized and risk-adapted prostate cancer screening program.

Effect of polygenic risk score for clinically significant prostate cancer in a screening program: The BARCODE 1 study results.

10500 Background: Incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is increasing, but there is no internationally agreed population screening program. Studies using an age-based PSA approach show a high rate of false-positive results as well as over-diagnosis of indolent PCa. Genome wide association studies identify common germline variants to calculate a polygenic risk score (PRS) associated with PCa risk. The BARCODE1 study used PRS to target PCa screening to those at higher risk based on genotype. Methods: European men aged 55-69yrs were recruited via Primary Care in the UK. PRS was constructed by summing weighted risk alleles for 130 PCa risk variants using germline DNA from saliva samples via mailed kits. Men with a PRS > 90th centile were invited for PCa screening using MRI and 12-core transperineal biopsy (including MRI fusion to target additional lesions where identified) irrespective of PSA result. Results: Invitation letters were sent to 40,292 men. 8,953 (22%) expressed an interest; 8,014 were eligible and sent a saliva kit. 6,644 consented; 6,393 were genotyped; 251 failed QC. A total of 6,142 participants had PRS calculated: 745 (12.1%) had a PRS > 90th centile and were invited to screening. 558/745 participants attended screening (121 declined, 66 excluded on health grounds). 551 underwent MRI and 468 had prostate biopsy resulting in 187 (40.0%) diagnoses of PCa, overall PCa detection rate 2.8%. Mean age at diagnosis 64.1yrs (range 57-73; median 64). Using NCCN criteria (2023) 103/187 (55.1%) of cancers were Intermediate or High Risk; 40/187 (21.4%) were Intermediate Unfavourable/High/Very High Risk. 119/187 (63.6%) men had a PSA <3.0ug/L; PPV of biopsy for PSA > 3.0ug/L was 49.6%. PPV of MRI (presence of PI-RADS 3-5 lesion) 60.4%. PPV of PRS alone 40%. 103/187 (55.1%) had Gleason >7; compared with 360/1014 (35.5%) p < 0.001 in the PSA directed ERSPC study. Conclusions: A population PCa screening program using PRS risk-stratification enriches for clinically significant PCa requiring treatment. It detects a high proportion of clinically significant disease compared with PSA or MRI based screening programs and MRI missed a significant proportion (17-67%) of cancers found on biopsy. This is the first study to assess if this approach will be useful in population screening programs. Clinical trial information: NCT03857477 . [Table: see text]

Prostate cancer screening in Switzerland: a literature review and consensus statement from the Swiss Society of Urology.

Over a decade ago, the United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer in all men, which considerably influenced prostate cancer screening policies worldwide after that. Consequently, the world has seen increasing numbers of advanced stages and prostate cancer deaths, which later led the USPSTF to withdraw its initial statement. Meanwhile, the European Union has elaborated a directive to address the problem of implementing prostate cancer screening in "Europe's Beating Cancer Plan". In Switzerland, concerned urologists formed an open Swiss Prostate Cancer Screening Group to improve the early detection of prostate cancer. On the 20thof September 2023, during the annual general assembly of the Swiss Society of Urology (SGU/SSU) in Lausanne, members positively voted for a stepwise approach to evaluate the feasibility of implementing organised prostate cancer screening programs in Switzerland. The following article will summarise the events and scientific advances in the last decade during which evidence and promising additional modalities to complement PSA-based prostate cancer screening have emerged. It also aims to provide an overview of contemporary strategies and their potential harms and benefits.

A cost-benefit analysis of mass prostate cancer screening

BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) causes a substantial health and financial burden worldwide, underscoring the need for efficient mass screening approaches. This study attempts to evaluate the Net Cost-Benefit Index (NCBI) of PCa screening in Iran to offer insights for informed decision-making and resource allocation.MethodThe Net Cost-Benefit Index (NCBI) was calculated for four age groups (40 years and above) using a decision-analysis model. Two screening strategies, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) solely and PSA with Digital Rectal Examination (DRE), were evaluated from the health system perspective. A retrospective assessment of 1402 prostate cancer (PCa) patients’ profiles were conducted, and direct medical and non-medical costs were calculated based on the 2021 official tariff rates, patient records, and interviews. The monetary value of mass screening was determined through Willingness to Pay (WTP) assessments, which served as a measure for the benefit aspect.ResultThe combined PSA and DRE strategy of screening is cost-effective, yields up to $3 saving in costs per case and emerges as the dominant strategy over PSA alone. Screening for men aged 70 and above does not meet economic justification, indicated by a negative Net Cost-Benefit Index (NCBI). The 40–49 age group exhibits the highest net benefit, $13.81 based on basic information and $13.54 based on comprehensive information. Sensitivity analysis strongly supports the cost-effectiveness of the combined screening approach.ConclusionThis study advocates prostate cancer screening with PSA and DRE, is economically justified for men aged 40–69. The results of the study recommend that policymakers prioritize resource allocation for PCa screening programs based on age and budget constraints. Men’s willingness to pay, especially for the 40–49 age group which had the highest net benefit, leverages their financial participation in screening services. Additionally, screening services for other age groups, such as 50–54 or 55–59, can be provided either for free or at a reduced cost.

A Community-Based Prostate Cancer Screening and Education Program for Asian American Men in Medically Underserved Communities.

This study analyzed data from a community-based prostate cancer (PCa) education and screening program (Prostate Outreach Project; POP) to enhance PCa-related knowledge among medically underserved Asian American men. It also examined PCa screening history, clinical abnormalities based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and digital rectal examination (DRE) results, and follow-up and PCa diagnosis rates. Participants-521 Asian men (251 Vietnamese, 142 Chinese, and 128 South Asians)-were offered PCa screening using PSA tests and/or DRE and an educational session on PCa. Of these men, 277 completed PCa-related knowledge surveys before and after viewing an educational video. Significant between-group differences in PCa-related knowledge were found at pre-assessment (p < 0.001) but not at post-assessment (p = 0.11), at which time all groups showed improved PCa-related knowledge. Most participants (77.9%) had never received PCa screening, but Vietnamese men had the lowest previous screening rate (17.3%). Chinese men had elevated PSA values and the highest abnormal DRE rates. Of the 125 men with abnormal screening outcomes, only 15.2% had adequate follow-up. Of the 144 men diagnosed with PCa in POP, 11.1% were Asians (seven Chinese, six Vietnamese, and three South Asian). Despite the ethnic heterogeneity among Asian men, a community outreach program may successfully enhance their PCa-related knowledge.

Early detection of prostate cancer: a screening charity's perspective

CHAPS Men's Health Charity is playing a key role in raising awareness of prostate cancer in the UK. In particular, it seeks to educate both the public and health care professionals on the importance of early diagnosis and campaigns for a national prostate cancer screening programme.

A new approach to prostate cancer screening

Abstract Prostate cancer screening based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has been a matter of controversy. Although screening for prostate cancer was effective in reducing mortality, it resulted in overdiagnosis, which translated into unnecessary treatments and numerous adverse effects. As a result, recommendations from scientific societies became increasingly restrictive. In the recent years, new approaches to prostate cancer screening have been proposed. These new approaches are aimed at solving the controversy between widespread screening vs. no screening, and reconsidering PSA testing as a screening tool with a good benefit/risk balance. In this context, the European Association of Urology submitted a proposal to the European Commission for prostate cancer screening to be performed as a function of baseline PSA concentrations. The European Commission recently recommended the implementation of organized prostate cancer screening programs for men aged ≤70 years based on PSA values in combination with follow-up magnetic resonance imaging.

Men’s Perception of Being Invited for Prostate Cancer Testing and the Information About Its Pros and Cons—A Survey from Two Population-based Testing Programmes

BackgroundThere is no national screening programme for prostate cancer in Sweden. Instead, population-based organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) projects are introduced to make information and testing more equal and effective. ObjectiveTo evaluate men’s perception of being invited to OPT and of the information in the invitation letter, and whether their perception is influenced by educational level. Design, setting, and participantsA questionnaire was sent out to men invited to OPT in 2020: 600 50-yr-old men in Region Västra Götaland and 1000 50-, 56-, and 62-yr-old men in Region Skåne. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisResponses were evaluated on a Likert scale. The chi-square test was used to compare proportions. Results and limitationsA total of 534 men (34%) responded. Almost all considered the OPT concept as very good (84%) or good (13%). Among men not previously undergone a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, a larger proportion with nonacademic (53%) than with academic education (41%) responded that the text about disadvantages was very clear (p = 0.03). A similar difference was observed for the text about advantages (68% vs 58%, p = 0.09). There was no association between education and searching for more information elsewhere. The low response rate is the main limitation. ConclusionsAlmost all responding men evaluating the invitation letter for OPT were positive about making a personal decision regarding whether or not to have a PSA test. Most were content with the brief information. Men with academic education were somewhat less likely to find the information very clear. This shows a need for further research about how best to describe the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer testing. Patient summaryAlmost all men who responded to a questionnaire to evaluate the invitation letter for organised prostate cancer testing were positive about the opportunity to make a personal decision regarding whether or not to have a prostate-specific antigen test.

The combined role of MRI prostate and prostate health index in improving detection of significant prostate cancer in a screening population of Chinese men.

Using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer (PCa) screening led to overinvestigation and overdiagnosis of indolent PCa. We aimed to investigate the value of prostate health index (PHI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate in an Asian PCa screening program. Men aged 50-75 years were prospectively recruited from a community-based PSA screening program. Men with PSA 4.0-10.0 ng ml -1 had PHI result analyzed. MRI prostate was offered to men with PSA 4.0-50.0 ng ml -1 . A systematic prostate biopsy was offered to men with PSA 4.0-9.9 ng ml -1 and PHI ≥35, or PSA 10.0-50.0 ng ml -1 . Additional targeted prostate biopsy was offered if they had PI-RADS score ≥3. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) ≥2 or ISUP GG 1 with involvement of ≥30% of total systematic cores. In total, 12.8% (196/1536) men had PSA ≥4.0 ng ml -1 . Among 194 men with PSA 4.0-50.0 ng ml -1 , 187 (96.4%) received MRI prostate. Among them, 28.3% (53/187) had PI-RADS ≥3 lesions. Moreover, 7.0% (107/1536) men were indicated for biopsy and 94.4% (101/107) men received biopsy. Among the men received biopsy, PCa, ISUP GG ≥2 PCa, and csPCa was diagnosed in 42 (41.6%), 24 (23.8%), and 34 (33.7%) men, respectively. Compared with PSA/PHI pathway in men with PSA 4.0-50.0 ng ml -1 , additional MRI increased diagnoses of PCa, ISUP GG ≥2 PCa, and csPCa by 21.2% (from 33 to 40), 22.2% (from 18 to 22), and 18.5% (from 27 to 32), respectively. The benefit of additional MRI was only observed in PSA 4.0-10.0 ng ml -1 , and the number of MRI needed to diagnose one additional ISUP GG ≥2 PCa was 20 in PHI ≥35 and 94 in PHI <35. Among them, 45.4% (89/196) men with PSA ≥4.0 ng ml -1 avoided unnecessary biopsy with the use of PHI and MRI. A screening algorithm with PSA, PHI, and MRI could effectively diagnose csPCa while reducing unnecessary biopsies. The benefit of MRI prostate was mainly observed in PSA 4.0-9.9 ng ml -1 and PHI ≥35 group. PHI was an important risk stratification step for PCa screening.

Are Prostate Cancer Screenings Performed in Compliance with Cancer Guidelines?

Objective: This study aims to examine whether our region's Prostate Cancer (PCa) screening programs comply with the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines. Method: This study was conducted as a retrospective, cross-sectional study between April 2014 and July 2022. Two hundred seventy patients who applied to our clinic for various reasons and were diagnosed with PCa were included in the study. Characteristics of the patients, such as age at diagnosis, comorbidities, age at first PSA examination, and PSA values, were recorded. Results: The mean age of the patients at the time of cancer diagnosis was 67.42±8.64 (43-91) years. PSA value (median±IQR) at the diagnosis was 9.58±19.43 (1.83-3437) ng/ml. When the distribution of cancer according to different decades of life was examined, there were 5 (%1.8) patients in the 40-50 age range, 44 (16.1%) in the 50-60 age range, 111 (40.7%) in the 60-70 age range, 86 (31.5%) in the 70-80 age range, and 24 (8.8%) after the age of 80. While 138 patients (51.1%) had local and benign tumor features, 59 (21.9%) patients were diagnosed with metastatic findings. Only 31.3% (61/195) of the patients were under regular follow-up by a specific urology doctor. Conclusion: It was found that the screening of prostate cancer, the most common type of cancer in men, was not performed by the guidelines, and as a result, diagnosis and treatment were delayed. It was determined that many patients lost the chance of curative treatment. In this disease, where early diagnosis is vital for effective treatment and preservation of quality of life, it is essential to follow up with aging men in accordance with the guidelines. It may be beneficial to periodically train and follow up with all health professionals interested in this issue.

Evaluation of a solely MRI-based prostate cancer screening programme - visioning Stage II

Evaluation of a solely MRI-based prostate cancer screening programme - visioning Stage II

Histopathological results of radical prostatectomy specimen of men younger than 50 years of age at the time of surgery: possible implications for prostate cancer screening programs?

IntroductionProstate cancer (PCa) detection is usually achieved by PSA measurement and, if indicated, further diagnostics. The recent EAU guidelines recommend a first PSA test at the age of 50 years, if no family history of PCa or BRCA2 mutation exists. However, some men might harbor significant PCa at younger age; thus we evaluated the histopathological results of men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) in their 40 s at our institution.Materials and methodsWe relied on the data of all patients who underwent RP in our institution between 1992 and 2020 and were younger than 50 years at the time of surgery. The histopathological results are descriptively presented. Moreover, we tested the effect of a positive family history on the descriptive results.ResultsOverall, 1225 patients younger than 50 years underwent RP at our institution. Median age was 47 years. Most patients showed favorable histopathological characteristics. However, 20% of patients had extraprostatic disease (≥ pT3a), 15% had ISUP Gleason grade group ≥ 3, and 7% had positive lymph nodes (pN1). Patients with a known positive family history did not have a higher rate of adverse disease as their counterparts with a negative family history.DiscussionOur data show that the majority of patients who were diagnosed with PCa at a very young age had favorable histopathological RP characteristics. However, a non-negligible proportion of patients already showed locally advanced disease and would have probably benefited from earlier PCa detection. This should be kept in mind when PCa screening recommendations are proposed.

Common vaccines and the risk of dementia: a population‐based study

AbstractBackgroundThe growing evidence for an infectious etiology of dementia supports the investigation of immunization as a preventative intervention. Prior observational studies suggesting that common vaccines are associated with an up to 60% decreased risk of dementia had several methodological limitations. Thus, to provide evidence for this question, we assessed in a large population whether common vaccines are associated with a decreased risk of dementia.MethodWe conducted a population‐based cohort study with a nested case‐control analysis using the Gold and Aurum datasets from the United Kingdom’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The study cohort included all dementia‐free individuals aged ≥50 years enrolled in the CPRD between January 1988 and December 2018, and followed until March 2021. Each case of dementia identified during follow‐up was matched on sex, age, cohort entry date, duration of follow‐up, and CPRD dataset with up to four controls randomly selected via risk‐set sampling. Conditional logistic regression yielded confounder‐adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of dementia associated with exposure to common vaccines (influenza, pneumonia, shingles, tetanus, diphtheria or pertussis) &gt;2 years before the index date compared to no exposure to these vaccines during the study period. In sensitivity analyses, we applied a longer lag period (10 years) and used active comparators (participation in screening programs for breast and prostate cancer) to account for detection bias.ResultOur study cohort included 13,383,431 dementia‐free individuals aged ≥50 years, including 212,562 who developed dementia over a mean 10‐year follow‐up (mean age 70 years; 62% female). Exposure to common vaccines was associated with an increased risk of dementia (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.36‐1.40), compared with no exposure, driven mostly by immunization for influenza (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.37‐1.41). Applying a longer lag period (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.20‐1.24) and using active comparators (versus breast cancer screening: OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.26‐1.42 / versus prostate cancer screening: OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14‐1.31) slightly attenuated the risk increase.ConclusionOur large population‐based study showed no decreased risk of dementia associated with exposure to common vaccines. The observed increase in the risk is likely a result of detection bias.

Design and Implementation of Taizhou Integrated Prostate Screening.

A community-based prostate cancer screening program was conducted to assess the morbidity and associated factors for prostate cancer among the subpopulation of men aged ≥50 years in Taizhou, China. Taizhou Integrated Prostate Screening (TIPS) is a large, observational, population-based study of prostate cancer screening data based on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations. A pilot census of all male residents aged 50 years or older was conducted in Luqiao District, one of the field sites of the TIPS cohort in the city of Taizhou, Zhejiang. The interviewer-administered questionnaire evaluated demographic characteristics and environmental exposure factors. A total of 1,806 out of 3,516 participants completed the questionnaire. The overall prevalence of PSA ≥4 ng/mL was 11.5%, and included participants at low risk (9.2%), moderate risk (1.7%), and high risk (0.6%). Participants aged 60-69, 70-79, and ≥80 years had a 2.7-fold, 4.2-fold, and 6.5-fold higher risk of elevated PSA, respectively, in comparison with those aged 50 to 59 years (p < .001). Eighteen patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, of whom 11 (61.1%) underwent radical surgery. This community-based PSA screening program indicated the results for early detection of prostate cancer among men aged ≥50 years. Early screening and appropriate clinical therapy for the management of prostate cancer are essential in this subpopulation.

An analysis of time trends in breast and prostate cancer mortality rates in Lithuania, 1986–2020

BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC) mortality rates in Lithuania remain comparatively high despite the ongoing BC and PC screening programmes established in 2006. The aim of this study was to investigate time trends in BC and PC mortality rates in Lithuania evaluating the effects of age, calendar period of death, and birth-cohort over a 35-year time span.MethodsWe obtained death certification data for BC in women and PC in men for Lithuania during the period 1986–2020 from the World Health Organisation database. Age-standardised mortality rates were analysed using Joinpoint regression. Age-period-cohort models were used to assess the independent age, period and cohort effects on the observed mortality trends.ResultsJoinpoint regression analysis indicated that BC mortality increased by 1.6% annually until 1996, and decreased by − 1.2% annually thereafter. The age-period-cohort analysis suggests that temporal trends in BC mortality rates could be attributed mainly to cohort effects. The cohort effect curvature showed the risk of BC death increased in women born prior to 1921, remained stable in cohorts born around 1921–1951 then decreased; however, trend reversed in more recent generations. The period effect curvature displayed a continuous decrease in BC mortality since 1991–1995. For PC mortality, after a sharp increase by 3.0%, rates declined from 2007 by − 1.7% annually. The period effect was predominant in PC mortality, the curvature displaying a sharp increase until 2001–2005, then decrease.ConclusionsModestly declining recent trends in BC and PC mortality are consistent with the introduction of widespread mammography and PSA testing, respectively, lagging up to 10 years. The study did not show that screening programme introduction played a key role in BC mortality trends in Lithuania. Screening may have contributed to favourable recent changes in PC mortality rates in Lithuania, however the effect was moderate and limited to age groups < 65 years. Further improvements in early detection methods followed by timely appropriate treatment are essential for decreasing mortality from BC and PC.

Medical, social, and economic perspectives of health care development. Prostate Cancer Early Diagnosis and Screening Program

Aim. To improve diagnostics and screening of prostate cancer to ensure early detection of malignant tumors.Materials and methods. We analyzed the population size and structure in the region in 2005–2010. The primary diagnostics of prostate cancer in regional healthcare institutions allowed the detection of locally advanced tumors and generalized cancer. Such diagnostic approaches can produce only accidental diagnosis since they lack proper systematization, organization, and control.Results. We have developed and implemented into clinical practice a long-term Program for Prostate Cancer Early Diagnosis and Screening. It includes a diagnostic algorithm for prostate cancer that was modified for clinical use. Screening starts with the PSA blood test performed annually. Patients with PSA level &gt;10 ng/mL should undergo additional diagnostic procedures. The Program implies active use of currently available information technologies to implement a unified routing scheme for cancer patients, execute measures for early cancer diagnosis, and warrant promptness and reliability of the cancer registry.Conclusion. Implementation of the long-term Program for Prostate Cancer Early Diagnosis and Screening will help to improve prostate cancer diagnosis, and, therefore, treatment outcomes.