SESSION TITLE: Tuesday Abstract Posters SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/22/2019 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM PURPOSE: Inhaled prostacyclin analogs have been utilized to improve oxygenation in severe refractory hypoxic respiratory failure. Administration of inhaled prostacyclins in patients with pneumonia or early acute lung injury not requiring positive pressure ventilation has not been studied. The prostacyclin analogue treprostinil may have anti-inflammatory effects, as well as improve oxygenation, potentially preventing or delaying onset or severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of administration of inhaled treprostinil, as well as the effect on oxygenation, in a group at risk for developing ARDS. METHODS: This was a single center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial for feasibility and safety (NCT02370095). Patients with hypoxemia due to pneumonia or signs of low pressure pulmonary edema were randomized to receive inhaled treprostinil or placebo (2:1 ratio respectively) via the TD-100 nebulizer device. Inclusion criteria were a unilateral or bilateral infiltrate on chest imaging and a ≥ 4 liter per minute supplemental oxygen requirement. Study drug was initiated at 6 breaths every four hours and titrated up to 12 breaths over 16 hours. Patients were maintained on study drug or placebo for 7 days, and then tapered off over a period of 4 days. If oxygenation improved rapidly, patients could be titrated off sooner. Study drug was stopped sooner if positive pressure ventilation was required. The primary outcome measure was change in daily SaO2/FiO2 (S/F) ratios. Adverse events were assessed for relatedness to study drug. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled over a period of 31 months. Baseline characteristics of the treprostinil and placebo cohorts were not significantly different with respect to age, gender, race, APACHE score or LIPS score. The baseline mean S/F ratio in the inhaled treprostinil group was 194 vs 212 in the placebo group (p = 0.62). Average time on study drug was not significantly different between the two groups. Four patients required positive pressure ventilation in the treprostinil group vs one in the placebo group. Utilizing a daily pre-dose S/F value (collected during and after treatment was discontinued) and adjusting for pre-treatment baseline S/F ratio, there was no significant treatment effect (p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled treprostinil administration is feasible in patients at risk for ARDS. Treatment with inhaled treprostinil was not associated with improvement in the S/F ratio relative to placebo. Adverse events associated with study drug were not severe nor unexpected based on the known adverse effect profile of inhaled treprostinil. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Inhaled treprostinil does not appear to be harmful in patients with hypoxia who are at risk for ARDS, however the clinical benefit is unclear at this time in the absence of larger studies to explore this question further. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Wayne Anderson, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Thomas Bice, source=Web Response Research Grant relationship with United Pharmaceuticals Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 03/15/2019 by Shannon Carson, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support Investigator relationship with Biomarck Pharmaceuticals Please note: $20001 - $100000 Added 03/15/2019 by Shannon Carson, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support No relevant relationships by Agathe Ceppe, source=Web Response Consultant relationship with United Therapeutics Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 02/14/2019 by Hubert Ford, source=Web Response, value=Travel also Consultant relationship with Actelion Please note: $1001 - $5000 Added 03/14/2019 by Hubert Ford, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Consultant relationship with Liquidia Please note: $1-$1000 Added 03/14/2019 by Hubert Ford, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Research Grant relationship with United Therapeutics Please note: $5001 - $20000 Added 03/14/2019 by Hubert Ford, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support No relevant relationships by Joyce Lanier, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Blair Wendlandt, source=Web Response
Read full abstract